DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance Assessment of Global Optimization Algorithms in Automatic Calibration of Groundwater Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Performance Assessment of Global Optimization Algorithms in Automatic Calibration of Groundwater Models Sruthi Sathyadevan Performance Assessment of Global Optimization Algorithms in Automatic Calibration of Groundwater Models 2 Performance Assessment of Global Optimization Algorithms in Automatic Calibration of Groundwater Models By Sruthi Sathyadevan in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday October 12, 2018 at 04:00 PM. Supervisor: Prof. dr. ir. Ronald van Nooyen, TU Delft Thesis committee: Prof. dr. ir. Nick van de Giesen, TU Delft Dr. ir. Willem-Jan Zaadnoordijk, TU Delft/TNO Ir. Bernard J. Meulenbreuk, TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. 3 4 Preface This report represents the culmination of my master thesis research that was undertaken as the final stage of my study Water Management at Delft University of Technology. I acquired a great deal of knowledge in groundwater flow modelling and on ways to efficiently do a scientific research. This could not have been made possible without the help and support of many. First, I would like to thank my university supervisor Ronald van Nooyen for his continued involvement at all stages of my thesis and ensuring his support when needed. A special thanks to my company supervisor Koen van der Hauw at Sweco Nederland for his immense patience and abundant knowledge I feel honoured to have been able to learn from. Further I thank my graduation committee for their feedback and guidance during my thesis. Heartfelt thanks go to Willem-Jan Zaadnoordijk, Bernard J. Meulenbreuk and Nick van de Giesen for steering my research in the right direction at all times. Without their support and advice, this report could not have been completed. Further, I want to thank Heleen Westerhof-Graafstal at the Waterschap De Dommel for her continued support during my research by passing on her knowledge. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family and friends for their presence and support in my life without whom this thesis could not have been completed. Sruthi Sathyadevan Delft, October 2018 5 6 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... 9 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. 11 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Groundwater modelling .................................................................................................................... 12 1.2. Need for parameter estimation ......................................................................................................... 19 1.3. Objective and research questions .................................................................................................... 21 2. Choice of Algorithms ................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.1. iPEST ............................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2. Genetic Algorithms ........................................................................................................................... 23 3. Study area ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.1. Why this area? ................................................................................................................................. 32 3.2. Model Area ....................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3. Properties of the area ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.4. Expected outcomes .......................................................................................................................... 37 4. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 4.1. Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2. iMOD Groundwater Model ................................................................................................................ 38 4.3. Calibration concepts ......................................................................................................................... 42 4.4. Calibration with iPEST...................................................................................................................... 43 4.5. Calibration with Genetic Algorithm ................................................................................................... 45 4.6. Comparison strategy ........................................................................................................................ 48 5. Results .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 5.1. iMOD Modeling ................................................................................................................................ 49 5.2. Final iMOD model v/s Triwaco Flairs model ..................................................................................... 57 5.3. Calibration using iPEST ................................................................................................................... 58 5.4. Calibration using GA ........................................................................................................................ 62 5.5. Comparison GA vs iPEST calibration output .................................................................................... 64 5.6. Final iMOD models ........................................................................................................................... 72 5.7. Validation ......................................................................................................................................... 75 5.8. GA modifications .............................................................................................................................. 77 6. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80 6.1. Comparison of GA vs iPEST ............................................................................................................ 80 6.2. Performance factors ......................................................................................................................... 80 6.3. Physical plausibility of the results ..................................................................................................... 80 7. Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 8. Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 9. Annex ................................................................................................................................................ 85 7 Abstract Calibration of groundwater models can be done manually by comparing the measured and computed groundwater heads or automatically using algorithms which do the work for you. Modules for this purpose are included in or linked externally to traditional groundwater modelling software and used. One such module PEST (Parameter ESTimation) uses the Levenburg Marquardt algorithm which is a combination of Gauss Newton and Gradient Descent methods to find the minima of a function. However, PEST is capable of finding only a local minimum for the objective function. A possibility exists that there is a global minimum that better fits our function and could give even better results for the optimization problem in, in our case, parameter estimation in groundwater models. A performance assessment has been done with a Genetic algorithm on a groundwater modelling problem in this study. 8 List of Figures Fig. 1.1. Modelling methodology (G.H.P. Oude Essink, 2000) Fig. 1.2. Different types of boundaries. Line ABC & EFG represent Dirichlet & Cauchy Boundaries, Lines HI & AD, Neumann Boundaries Fig. 1.3. Determination of steady state groundwater flow equation (Oude Essink, 2009) Fig. 1.4. Cell designations and boundary conditions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ex Ante Evaluation of Nutrients in Fresh, Coastal and Marine Waters with a Focus on the Meuse Basin
    Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin Author(s) Joost van den Roovaart Tineke Troost Annelotte van der Linden Wilfred Altena 2 of 78 Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin Client Rijkswaterstaat Water, Verkeer en Leefomgeving Contact de heer G. Niebeek Reference Roovaart, J. van den, T. Troost, A. van der Linden, W. Altena, 2021. Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin. Deltares report 11205267-005-ZWS- 0002 Keywords Water Framework Directive, nutrients, ex ante evaluation, coastal and marine waters, Water Framework Directive Explorer, North Sea Model Document control Version 1.0 Date 17-02-2021 Project nr. 11205267-005 Document ID 11205267-005-ZWS-0002 Pages 78 Classification Status final Author(s) Joost van den Roovaart Tineke Troost Annelotte van der Linden Wilfred Altena Doc. version Author Reviewer Approver Publish 0.1 Joost van den Roovaart Sibren Loos Renée Talens 0.5 Joost van den Roovaart Sibren Loos Renée Talens 1.0 3 of 78 Ex ante evaluation of nutrients in fresh, coastal and marine waters with a focus on the Meuse basin Deltares Summary This study has been carried out on request of the International Meuse Commission and the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management with the goal to give insight in the total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations for the Dutch transboundary water bodies and the fresh, transitional, coastal and marine waters in 2027 for five different scenarios and compare these with the nutrient targets of the Water Framework Directive and the OSPAR Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Science Nano Accepted Manuscript
    Environmental Science Nano Accepted Manuscript This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains. rsc.li/es-nano Page 1 of 23 Environmental Science: Nano Nano Impact Statement Site specific risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) requires spatially resolved fate models. Validation of such models is difficult, due to present limitations in detecting ENPs in the environment. Here we report on progress towards validation of the spatially resolved hydrological ENP fate model NanoDUFLOW, by comparing measured and modeled concentrations of < 450 nm metal-based particles in a river. Concentrations measured with Asymmetric Flow-Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4) coupled to ICP-MS, clearly reflected the hydrodynamics of the river and showed satisfactory to good agreement with modeled concentration profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Adriaen Poirterslaan 23, Waalre Adriaen Poirterslaan 23 Waalre
    ADRIAEN POIRTERSLAAN 23, WAALRE ADRIAEN POIRTERSLAAN 23 WAALRE 3 0 Geachte heer, geachte mevrouw, Dear sir, madam, Dank voor uw interesse in deze klassieke, vrijstaande villa met garage Thank you for your interest in this classic, detached villa with garage voor meerdere auto’s op excellente woonlocatie in Waalre. Om u een for several cars on an excellent residential location in Waalre. To give helder en compleet beeld te geven, bevat deze documentatie de vol- you a clear and complete picture, this documentation contains the gende informatie: following information: Introductie 8 Introduction 8 Feiten & Cijfers 10 - 13 Facts & Figures 10 - 13 Foto’s 14 - 51 Pictures 14 - 51 Indeling (plattegronden) 52 - 55 Layout (floor plans) 52 - 55 Indeling (uitgebreide omschrijving) 56 - 59 Classification (extended description) 56- 59 Locatie en omgeving 60 - 65 Location and surroundings 60 - 65 Algemene informatie 66 - 70 General information 66 - 70 Deze documentatie is met uiterste zorg samengesteld om u een goe- This documentation has been compiled with the utmost care to de eerste indruk te geven. Vanzelfsprekend zijn we u van dienst met give you a good first impression. Naturally we are at your service antwoorden op uw vragen. We maken graag een afspraak voor een with answers to your questions. We would be happy to make an uitgebreide bezichtiging, zodat u een persoonlijk en nog beter beeld appointment for an extensive viewing, so that you can get a personal krijgt. and even better picture. Met hartelijke groet, With heartfelt greetings, Mevrouw W.A.M. Kanters RM RT Ms W.A.M. Kanters RM RT T 06 10 34 56 57 T 06 10 34 56 57 4 5 5 PLUSPUNTEN VAN DEZE KLASSIEKE ROSENTHALER 5 PLUS POINTS OF THIS CLASSIC ROSENTHALER VILLA MET GARAGE VOOR MEERDERE AUTO’S VILLA WITH GARAGE FOR SEVERAL CARS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamont - Achel
    HAMONT - ACHEL Opzoek naar een leuke uitstap ? Ontdek Hamont-Achel, een charmant stadje in het noorden van de provincie Limburg waar Teuten en Trappisten centraal staan. Met haar groene weelde straalt Hamont-Achel een gastvrije sfeer uit, ideaal voor een stevige wandeling of fietstocht. Ontdek Hamont met haar typische stadskern in de vorm van een langgerekte driehoek en Achel met haar typische langgerekte dorpskern. Zoek en geniet van de ongelofelijk veel verborgen schatten in Hamont-Achel, aangeboden door haar rijk verleden. Daarnaast kan je, door haar ligging, vele Nederlandse bezienswaardigheden bezoeken. Hamont-Achel, een absolute aanrader met zijn heerlijke streekproducten en talloze overnachtingsmogelijkheden. Deze grenzeloze charme kan je wandelend, fietsend, met de auto of een bus op eigen houtje of met een toeristische gids ontdekken. Aarzel niet en bel, mail, of kom gerust eens langs bij V.V.V. Hamont-Achel. Daar kan u terecht voor inlichtingen van onze toeristische groepsuitstappen, wandel- en fietsroutes, en brochures. Ook kan u hier terecht voor fietsenverhuur. Contact : V.V.V. Hamont-Achel vzw Gen. Dempseylaan 1 3930 Hamont-Achel Tel. 0032(0)11 64 60 70 E-mail : [email protected] Website: www.toerisme-hamont-achel.be Facebookpagina: VVV Hamont-Achel 2021 INHOUD Musea DE TOMP - Achel GREVENBROEKMUSEUM - Achel NAPOLEONSMOLEN - Hamont DE NOORD-LIMBURGSE TEUTENKAMER - Hamont NEDERLANDS STEENDRUKMUSEUM - Valkenswaard (Nederland) VALKERIJ EN SIGARENMAKERIJ MUSEUM - Valkenswaard (Nederland) Bedrijven KAASMAKERIJ CATHARINADAL
    [Show full text]
  • Beekherstelplan Trajectdeel Tongelreep Op Basis Van Het Concept “Building with Nature”
    Beekherstelplan trajectdeel Tongelreep Op basis van het concept “Building with Nature” Maarten de Bruin Beekherstelplan trajectdeel Tongelreep Op basis van het concept “Building with Nature” Maarten de Bruin Versie : Definitief Datum : januari 2016 Naam project : Beekherstelplan voor de Tongelreep Opdrachtgever : Wim Cardinaal (regiobeheerder Waterschap De Dommel) Opgesteld door : Maarten de Bruin (student Hogeschool Van Hall Larenstein) Onderdeel van : Afstudeeropdracht Bos en Natuurbeheer (major NLT) Begeleid door : Jan Jacob Dubbelhuis (studiebegeleider Hogeschool Van Hall Larenstein) Foto voorzijde :Sterrenkroossoort en actieve erosie en sedimentatie in de Tongelreep, stroomopwaarts van de brug bij Achtereind. Dit traject behoort tot habitattype Beken en rivieren met waterplanten (waterranonkels). (foto: M. de Bruin, december 2014) Inhoud 1 INLEIDING ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aanleiding .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Vraagstelling ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Afbakening opdracht .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Methodiek ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable R4
    Project no. 505428 (GOCE) AquaTerra Integrated Modelling of the river-sediment-soil-groundwater system; advanced tools for the management of catchment areas and river basins in the context of global change Integrated Project Thematic Priority: Sustainable development, global change and ecosystems Deliverable No.: Basin R3.7 and R3.10 Title R3.7: Chapter in BASIN report on structured research results for further interpretation in terms of management tools/approaches for river basin management (INTEGRATOR), and in terms of EU policy impacts (EUPOL), delivered to the steering committee Title R3.10: Overview of analysis results for the Dommel catchment system Due date of deliverable: May 2005 Actual submission date: May 2005 Start date of project: 01 June 2004 Duration: 60 months Organisation name and contact of lead contractor and other contributing partners for this deliverable: J. Joziasse, TNO, P.O. Box 342, 7300 AH Apeldoorn, The Netherlands J. Vink, RIZA, Lelystad, The Netherlands S. Brouyère, HGULg, Liège, Belgium C. van der Wielen, ISSeP, Liège, Belgium Revision: H. Rijnaarts, J. Barth Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) X RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) SUMMARY An overview is presented of the research activities conducted by several AquaTerra work packages (BASIN, TREND, FLUX, BIOGEOCHEM) in the Meuse basin, with the emphasis on two specific sites: the Walloon region and the Dommel catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hervergunning RWZI Achel Achel
    Vlaamse Overheid Departement Leefmilieu, Natuur en Energie Graaf de Ferrarisgebouw Koning Albert II-laan 20, bus 8, 1000 BRUSSEL Tel (02)553 80 79 – Fax (02)553 80 75 Ontheffing tot het opstellen van een MER. Ontheffingsbeslissing Project: Hervergunning RWZI Achel Achel Initiatiefnemer: AQUAFIN NV Dijkstraat 8 2630 Aartselaar 28 augustus 2012 OHPR0490 Projectbeschrijving en mer-procedure De ontheffingsaanvraag werd opgesteld in het kader van de hernieuwingsaanvraag van de milieuvergunning van de bestaande rioolwaterzuiveringsinstallatie (RWZI) Achel. De huidige milieuvergunning voor de exploitatie verloopt op 2 december 2013. De installatie bevindt zich op het grondgebied van de stad Hamont-Achel. De RWZI Achel maakt deel uit van het gelijknamige zuiveringsgebied en heeft een agglomeratiegrootte van 10 900 IE (à 60 O2/ IE dag). De RWZI werd in 1996 gebouwd en heeft een capaciteit van 12 600 IE (à 60 O2/ IE dag). Het zuiveringsgebied Achel heeft een zuiveringsgraad van circa 88% en een rioleringsgraad van circa 91%. Het afvalwater dat op de RWZI Achel behandeld wordt, is afkomstig uit de deelgemeenten Achel, Sint- Huibrechts-Lille en een gedeelte van Neerpelt. Eén gravitaire collector en één persleiding voeren het afvalwater naar de installatie. De RWZI Achel situeert zich tevens op de grens met Nederland. Het effluent wordt geloosd in de Prinsenloop, een onbevaarbare waterloop van 2de categorie met VHAG 10 046. Deze waterloop heeft als kwaliteitsdoelstelling basiskwaliteit en is volgens de nieuwe typologie voorlopig niet ingedeeld en wordt bijgevolg per afspraak binnen het type “kleine beek” ingedeeld. De Prinsenloop stroomt noordwaarts Nederland in en vloeit daar samen met de Warmbeek, een onbevaarbare waterloop van 1ste categorie met VHAG 9508.
    [Show full text]
  • Overzicht Van Waardevol Cultureel Erfgoed En Aardkundige Waarden in De Gemeente Waalre Versie 2018
    Bijlagen 8.9 en 9.9: Overzicht van waardevol cultureel erfgoed en aardkundige waarden in de gemeente Waalre Versie 2018 Inhoudsopgave 1. Overzicht van gebouwde rijksmonumenten ......................................................... 2 2. Overzicht van archeologische rijksmonumenten ................................................. 6 3. Overzicht van gemeentelijke monumenten .......................................................... 8 4. Overzicht van rijksbeschermde dorpsgezichten................................................... 9 5. Overzicht van historische buitenplaatsen .......................................................... 10 6. Overzicht van archeologisch waardevolle gebieden .......................................... 11 7. Overzicht van cultuurhistorische ensembles ...................................................... 18 8. Overzicht van aardkundige waarden ................................................................. 27 Kasteel van Loon (Copie naar afbeelding in handschrift A. C.Brock, De stad en meierij van 's- Hertogenbosch.) 1 1. Overzicht van gebouwde rijksmonumenten De gegevens in dit overzicht zijn ontleend aan het Rijksmonumentenregister zoals beheerd door de Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed (RCE) en opgenomen in de Objecten Databank (ODB). Uit de ODB zijn alleen de volgende gegevens overgenomen: rijksmonumentnummer, straat en huisnummer en de inleiding van de redengevende omschrijving. Voor een uitgebreide (redengevende) omschrijving en waardering van het gebouwde erfgoed in de gemeente Waalre, zie de
    [Show full text]
  • Validatie NHI Voor Het Waterschap De Dommel
    BIJLAGE F ina l Cre p ort VALIDATIE NHI WATERSCHAP DE DOMMEL 2011 RAPPORT w02 BIJLAGE C VALIDATIE NHI WATERSCHAP DE DOmmEL 2011 RAPPORT w02 [email protected] www.stowa.nl Publicaties van de STOWA kunt u bestellen op www.stowa.nl TEL 033 460 32 00 FAX 033 460 32 01 Stationsplein 89 3818 LE Amersfoort POSTBUS 2180 3800 CD AMERSFOORT Validatie NHI voor het waterschap de Dommel Jaren 2003 en 2006 HJM Ogink Opdrachtgever: Stowa Validatie NHI voor het waterschap de Dommel Jaren 2003 en 2006 HJM Ogink Rapport december 2010 Validatie NHI voor het waterschap de november, 2010 Dommel Inhoud 1 Inleiding ........................................................... Fout! Bladwijzer niet gedefinieerd. 1.1 Aanleiding validatie NHI ........................................................................... 3 1.2 Aanpak ...................................................................................................... 4 2 Neerslag en verdamping .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Neerslag in 2003 en 2006 vergeleken met de normalen ......................... 5 2.2 Berekeningsprocedure model neerslag .................................................... 8 2.3 Verdampingsberekening in NHI................................................................ 9 2.4 Referentie en actuele verdamping ......................................................... 10 3 Oppervlaktewater .............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Schematisatie van de Dommel in NHI ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Decision Support System for the Provision and Monitoring of Urban Greenspace
    A spatial decision support system for the provision and monitoring of urban greenspace Citation for published version (APA): Pelizaro, C. (2005). A spatial decision support system for the provision and monitoring of urban greenspace. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR594825 DOI: 10.6100/IR594825 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2005 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Central Baltic River GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Exercise June 2007
    Version 2 – July 9th, 2007 Report on the Central Baltic River GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Exercise June 2007 Authors: Sebastian Birk University of Duisburg-Essen, DE Nigel Willby University of Stirling, UK Christian Chauvin CEMAGREF, FR Hugo Coops Delft Hydraulics, NL Luc Denys Research Institute for Nature and Forest, BE (FL) Daniel Galoux CRNFB, BE (WL) Agnieszka Kolada Institute of Environmental Protection, PL Karin Pall Systema, AT Isabel Pardo University of Vigo, ES Roelf Pot NL Doris Stelzer DE CBrivGIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Report Table of Contents 0 Executive Summary..................................................................................................4 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................6 2 National Assessment Methods .................................................................................7 2.1 Survey............................................................................................................................7 2.2 Abundance .....................................................................................................................7 2.3 Assessment and Classification.......................................................................................8 3 Common Intercalibration Types..............................................................................13 4 Data Basis ..............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Coupled Hydrodynamic-Closed Ecological Cycle Approach for Modelling Dissolved Oxygen in Surface Waters
    This is a repository copy of Evaluation of a coupled hydrodynamic-closed ecological cycle approach for modelling dissolved oxygen in surface waters. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/147895/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Camacho Suarez, V.V., Brederveld, R.J., Fennema, M. et al. (5 more authors) (2019) Evaluation of a coupled hydrodynamic-closed ecological cycle approach for modelling dissolved oxygen in surface waters. Environmental Modelling & Software. ISSN 1364-8152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.003 Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Evaluation of a coupled hydrodynamic- closed ecological cycle approach for modelling dissolved oxygen in surface waters Vivian V. Camacho Suarez a, Robert J. Brederveld b ,Marieke Fennema e, Antonio Moreno-Rodenas c, Jeroen Langeveld c, Hans Korving d, Alma N.A.
    [Show full text]