Co-Creation Workshops Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Co-creation Workshops Report D2.2 Deliverable 31/05/19 Mayke van Dinter1, Abdolrasoul Habibipour2 1Municipality of Eindhoven 2Luleå University of Technology (LTU) Disclaimer The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information as its sole risk and liability. The document reflects only the author’s views and the Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 730052 Topic: SCC-2-2016-2017: Smart Cities and Communities Nature based solutions PAGE 2 OF 77 Dissemination level PU Public CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Deliverable administration No & name D2.2 Co-creation workshops report Status Due M24 Date June 2019 Author(s) EIN, LTU Description of T2.1 Co-creation Training and Workshops in Front-Runner Cities (EIN, GEN, TRE, LTU) the related task M1-24 and the Report on EASW scenario building workshop training and co-creation workshops deliverable. Extract from DoA Participants EIN, GEN, TRE, LTU Comments This deliverable has not yet been approved by the funding agency V Date Authors Description 1 02/05/2019 Mayke van Dinter, 1st version readu Abdolrasoul Habibipour 2 08/05/2019 Spela Zalokar WP lead check, (ENoLL) 3 09/05/2019 (ENoLL) WP Quality Manager check, Ines Vaittinen 4 16/05/2019 Laura Wendling Internal cross-check (WP5) (VTT) 5 24/05/2019 Ernesta Maciulyte Quality check (FHG) [email protected] | www.UNaLab.eu UNaLab● Co-creation Workshops Report About UNaLab The UNaLab project is contributing to the development of smarter, more inclusive, more resilient and UNaLab will develop, via co-creation with stakeholders and implementation of ‘living lab’ more sustainable urban communities through the implementation of nature-based solutions (NBS) co- demonstration areas, a robust evidence base and European framework of innovative, replicable, and created with and for local stakeholders and citizens. Each of the UNaLab project’s three Front-Runner locally-attuned nature-based solutions to enhance the climate and water resilience of cities. UNaLab Cities – Eindhoven (NL), Genova (IT) and Tampere (FI) – has a strong commitment to smart, citizen- focuses on urban ecological water management, accompanied with greening measures and innovative driven solutions for sustainable urban development. The establishment of Urban Living Lab (ULL) and inclusive urban design. The UNaLab partners aim to develop smarter, more inclusive, more innovation spaces in Eindhoven, Genova and Tampere supports on-going co-creation, demonstration, resilient and more sustainable local societies through nature based innovation jointly created with and experimentation and evaluation of a range of different NBS targeting climate change mitigation and for stakeholders and citizens. UNaLab’s 3 front runner cities: Tampere, Eindhoven and Genova, have adaptation along with the sustainable management of water resources. The Front-Runner Cities actively a track record in smart and citizen driven solutions for sustainable development. They support 7 promote knowledge- and capacity-building in the use of NBS to enhance urban climate and water follower cities: Stavanger, Prague, Castellon, Cannes, Başakşehir, Hong Kong and Buenos Aires plus resilience within a network of committed partner cities, including seven Follower Cities – Stavanger, share experiences with observers as City of Guangzhou and the Brazilian network of Smart Cities. Prague, Castellón, Cannes, Başakşehir, Hong Kong and Buenos Aires – and the Observers, Guangzhou Therefore UNaLab results will impact on different urban socio-economic realities, with diversity in and the Brazilian Network of Smart Cities. Collaborative knowledge production among this wide size, challenges and climate conditions. In order to create an EU reference demonstration and go-to- network of cities enables UNaLab project results to reflect diverse urban socio-economic realities, along market environment for NBS, UNaLab will use and further develop the ENoLL Urban Living Lab with differences in the size and density of urban populations, local ecosystem characteristics and climate model, and the European Awareness Scenario Workshop method for the co-creation of solutions, and conditions. Evidence of NBS effectiveness to combat the negative impacts of climate change and the roadmap approach, in this way achieving an innovative NBS toolbox. urbanisation will be captured through a comprehensive monitoring and impact assessment framework. Further replication and up-scaling of NBS is supported by development of an ULL model and associated tools tailored to the co-creation of NBS to address climate- and water-related challenges, a range of applicable business and financing models, as well as governance-related structures and processes to support NBS uptake. The results of the project will be a robust evidence base and go-to-market environment for innovative, replicable, and locally-attuned NBS. Partners This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 730052 Topic: SCC-2-2016-2017: Smart Cities and Communities Nature based solutions PAGE 4 OF 77 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Purpose and target group ..................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Contributions of partners ..................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Relations to other activities .................................................................................................. 8 2. Theoretic / scientific background ................................................................................ 10 2.1 Urban Living Lab............................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Co-creation methods and techniques ................................................................................. 12 2.3 Design Thinking and Transdisciplinary Methods .............................................................. 19 3. Chosen method for workshops .................................................................................... 21 3.1 Method 1: EASW............................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Method 2: Design Thinking ............................................................................................... 21 3.3 Comparison of methods ..................................................................................................... 22 4. Context ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 City: Geographic, climatic, environmental and demographic context ............................... 23 4.1.1 Tampere .......................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.2 Eindhoven ....................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.3 Genova ............................................................................................................................ 26 4.2 City: NBS to be implemented in UNaLab context ............................................................ 28 4.2.1 Tampere .......................................................................................................................... 28 4.2.2 Eindhoven ....................................................................................................................... 30 4.2.3 Genova ............................................................................................................................ 31 4.3 City: Familiarity with NBS and co-creation ...................................................................... 32 4.3.1 Tampere .......................................................................................................................... 32 4.3.2 Eindhoven ....................................................................................................................... 32 4.3.3 Genova ............................................................................................................................ 33 4.4 Comparing the cities .......................................................................................................... 34 5. Setting of workshops ..................................................................................................... 35 5.1 Tampere - General ............................................................................................................. 35 5.1.1 General setup .................................................................................................................. 35 5.1.2 Selection of stakeholders/participants ............................................................................. 35 5.2 Tampere - Vuores ............................................................................................................