DOCSLIB.ORG

Here Are Other Branches at Sheffield Mid/And and Botherwood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Here Are Other Branches at Sheffield Mid/And and Botherwood CONTENTS FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................................... .. 3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. .. A HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... .. 5 RATIONALISATION .................................................................................................................................... .. 6 TINSLEY MARSHALLING YARD ............................................................................................... .. 7 TINSLEY TRACTION MAINTENANCE DEPOT .................................................... .. 11 RATIONALISATION OF TRACK & FACILITIES SHEFFIELD DIVISION ............................................................................................................................... .. 13 THE CHANGING PATTERN OF THE STEEL INDUSTRY ........................... .. 14 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. .. 15 1 . PROVIDEIH Illllilllil has been helping railwaymen (and the general public): protect their families save for the future buy their houses for over 100 years WE COULD HELP YOU TOO WHY NOT GIVE US A RING AT SHEFFIELD 750985 .:-"'=‘-:\ Pnovinrnr murunvéié LIFEASSURANCEASSOCIATION-FDUNDEIJI840 h Q F 2 /u’ \\Y-’ FOREWORD We extend a hearty we/come to you, our visitors to this OPEN DA Y of Tins/ey Marsha/ling Yard which has been arranged to coincide with the Centenary Celebrations of the A.S. L.E. & F. (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen). The A.S. L.E. & F. was founded in Sheffield in February 7880, when a few /ocomotivemen found it necessary to form a trade union to protect their inter- ests. They adopted the name of Sheffield No. 7 Branch and since then this branch has catered for the needs of Footp/atemen at the Old Steam Shed at Neepsend and Darnall and at it's peak, about 7.948, had around 700 members. ln fact between the two World Wars, in 7926, the members built their own Social Club lLoco Club Pitsmoor). Over the years i't has been represented at National Level by the /ate Mr. A. Wild, also by Mr. R. Jones, ll/Ir. J. Booth and Mr. S. Twigg for many years secretary, and Mr. W. Ronksley, existing president of A.S. L. E. & F. When British Rail decided to rationalise the Sheffield Division in 7965, and open Tins/ey Mar- shalling Yard, it was considered convenient to re- organise the A.S.L.E. & F. branches in the district as Tins/ey was to be staffed by men formerly station- ed at Darnall, Grimesthorpe, Wath, Staveley Central, Barrow Hill and Cank/ow. lt was also decided to reform branches to cater for the needs of the men stationed at depots which were to remain after the opening of Tins/ey Yard. There are other branches at Sheffield Mid/and and Botherwood. Mr. P. Young was Branch Secretary at this time, and it was generally agreed that Sheffield No. 7 Branch should retain it's original name for historical reasons, and many items of historical interest were deposited in the archives of the City Library when Mr. P. Young succeeded Mr. J. Booth, who, as Secretary had held that office for 37 years in 7964. The present Secretary is ll/Ir. S. Rimmington. Thank you for your support and hoping you thoroughly en/0y your visit to Tins/ey. On behalf of the Branch Committee. \ \ I l ‘ L__:_ _,_ .._ S. 5- °°“‘s INTRODUCTION R.J.MDRRlS Area Manager No railway historian would surely deny that during the heyday of railway building, because out- side competition was virtually non existant, and be- cause the various companies were engaged almost ex- clusively in competition with each other, much un- planned growth took place. Duplication of resources was rife, and as a result, when the various companies amalgamated to form what we now know as British Rail, much rational- isation was required to avoid wastage of both men and machinery. Inherited also, due to little new investment, was a vast collection of buildings no longer suitable for ever changing needs. It is popular to believe that this trend has only become prevalent in recent years, but in this context it is interesting to note that when the Wicker was opened as a rail terminal, it was described thus:- “On entering the station that is very commodious and handsome, a spacious shed supported by cast iron pillars presents itself. The construction of the shed deserves notice com- bining as it does, strength with apparent lightness." By 1870 however, this eulogy was forgotten for the same building was described as:- “The wretched accommodation offered as a miserable dilapidated structure which was made to do duty as a station." This booklet, therefore, traces the events which led to the general rationalisation of the Sheffield division and the construction of Tinsley Marshalling Yard and the Diesel Maintenance Depot in particular. Subsequently it provides a detailed description of the operating of these two locations, together with an appraisal of the present Tinsley Area Manager's or- ganisation, and a potted history of Sheffield’s most important industry - steel making. The booklet has been produced to mark the first Open Day at Tinsley in June 1980. ll- HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The rst railway in the area from Rotherham Westgate In the middle 1950's, therefore, the network of railways to the Wicker was brought into use in 1838. Thereafter and depots remained much as it was at the turn of the cen- further lines and stations were opened as follows:- tury, despite the growth of competition in the interim, and the changed nature of the demand upon the railway for its services. 1840: Derby to Rotherham Masborough The former L.N.E.R., with its principal passenger station 1845: Sheffield Bridgehouse to Manchester via at Sheffield Victoria, had its main goods sundries depot at Woodhead Bridgehouses, a coal depot at Harvest Lane, fruit and perish- ables at Blast Lane and full load traffic at Park Sidings, Atter- 13491 Sheffield Bfidgehol-‘Se T0 Gein$b0f0U9h cliffe and West Tinsley; a C. & W. workshop in the former (Sheffield Vi0t0I'ie Sfetidn Opened 1351) steam shed at Neepsend and motive power depots at Darnall and Mexborough; and a main marshalling yard at Bernard 18641 W0Odburn Junetidn ‘£0 Rotherhem end Road, with other yards at Broughton Lane Up and Down, iVieXb0l'°U9h lckles and Rotherham Road. 13701 Chesterfield I0 Attefeiiffe linciuding Midiend The former L.M.S.R., with its main passenger station at Station) Sheffield Midland, had an even greater multiplicity of depots and yards. These included sundries and full load depots at 1900: Sheffield District Railway (Brightside Junction Wicker and Queens Road, coal depots at Heeley and Nunnery, to Treeton Junction) market traffic at Wharf Street, and full loads at Heeley, Pond Street, Brightside Wharf and Upwell Street Wharf; a C. & W. 19033 Citv G00d$ Branch (to Wharf Street) Workshop at Grimesthorpe and motive power depots at Grimesthorpe, Millhouses and Canklow; main marshalling In 1923 as a result of the amaigemetidn Called f0!’ bV the yards at Masborough and Woodhouse Mill, with other yards at railways Act of 1921, all these various lines were absorbed into Grimesthorpe, Engine Shed Sidings, Wincobank Up and Down, two groups — the LNER (G. C. Section) and the LMSR Roundwood and Cardigan Sidings. (Midland Section) — but, whilst in the 1930's some arrange- ments were made for the pooling of traffic, there was no Facilities — passenger, freight handling, motive power — attempt to rationalise service and facilities. remained, in number, far beyond the real need, in the new circumstances. The goods depots were out of date, cramped, Nationalisation in 1948, under the Transport Act of 1947, lacking in mechanical aids and expensive to run; the marshall- afforded a further opportunity for the elimination of duplicate ing yards were small and badly laid out; and the need for trip facilities, but little progress was made for some time. In 1950, working between yards and depots was excessive, costly and Regional boundary changes brought the whole of Sheffield — conductive to transit delays. at least commercially and administratively — into the Eastern Region. Operation and motive power functions, however, were still on a ‘penetrating lines’ basis, under which the Dis- trict Operating and Motive Power Officers — although Eastern Region Staff — continued to owe functional allegiance to the London Midland Region. No positive step forward towards rationalisation was, in practice, possible during this period, whilst the dual control of operations continued. The only progress made towards modernisation during this phase was completion of the electrification of the Man- chester — Sheffield - Wath lines, the freight service from Wath to Dunford being electrified in 1952, the passenger services in 1954 and the remaining freight services in 1955, after the new exchange sidings at Rotherwood became available. A small electric locomotive maintenance depot was erected alongside the steam shed at Darnall. (ln 1958, this was converted to the maintenance of diesel shunting locomotives and the servicing of the diesel multiple-unit trains introduced into the Sheffield Victoria — Lincoln and Sheffield Midland — Barnsley ser- vices). 5 HATIQNALISATION This, then, was the position in 1957, when the ‘penetrat- Other features
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) Between
    OFFICIAL Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) between (1) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (2) Abellio East Midlands Limited Dated: 01/09/2020 Conformed copy as at 12 February 2021 OFFICIAL Amended by: 1. 1st Supplemental Agreement dated 05 February 2021 2. 3rd Supplemental Agreement dated 12 February 2021 OFFICIAL Contents 1. Interpretation ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Network Code and Traction Electricity Rules .............................................................................. 7 3. Conditions precedent and duration ............................................................................................. 7 4. Standard of performance ............................................................................................................. 8 5. Permission to use ........................................................................................................................ 9 6. Operation and maintenance of trains and Network ...................................................................10 7. Track Charges and other payments ..........................................................................................11 8. Liability .......................................................................................................................................11 9. Not used ....................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • London North Eastern Region Commentary 04
    Timetable Planning Rules London North Eastern 2020 TIMETABLE Version 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 London North Eastern Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 322 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 5.1 Sectional Running Times .........................................74 1 Introduction and General Notes .................... 3 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs ...................................74 1.1 Index of Routes ............................................................. 4 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .......................................74 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .................. 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times75 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .............................................. 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Consisting of Passenger 1.2.2 Rule Book ................................................................ 7 Vehicles on Goods Lines ............................................75 1.3 Definitions ....................................................................... 9 5.2 Headways ......................................................................75 1.3.1 Train Classification .............................................. 9 5.2.1 Headway Values .................................................75 1.3.2 Days of Operation ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02 We are delighted to present the East Midlands Route Study, a The work carried out within this Route Study enables us to identify document which sets out the building blocks of our strategic vision any gaps between the planned capability of the network in 2023, for delivering rail growth throughout the East Midlands over the and the capability required to meet forecast growth for passenger next 30 years. and freight demand. By also looking ahead over the longer term to 2043, we can build our understanding of capacity needs in the The East Midlands route serves many different rail markets, long future, making plans to deliver those in the most efficient manner. distance and commuting services operate regularly into London St Pancras International. Strong links between urban centres, such as Network Rail has led the development of the East Midlands Route Nottingham, Leicester and Derby, help people travel for work, Study which was published as a Draft for Consultation in January education and leisure. Being located at the heart of Britain’s rail 2015, and was open for consultation until April 2015. The study has network means the Route forms a key part of major cross country been developed using a collaborative approach with input from the and freight journeys. rail industry, local authorities, users and developers from the freight industry, the Department for Transport and Rail Delivery Group. Over recent years, the rail industry has seen consistent growth in demand and this is forecast to continue.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Vision: a Strategy for the Restoration and Development of the Chesterfield Canal
    Chesterfield Canal Partnership 2020 Vision: A Strategy for the Restoration and Development of the Chesterfield Canal “Bringing the Past into Focus for the Future” Third Edition, Revised 2006 2020 Vision: A Strategy for the Restoration and Development of the Chesterfield Canal Preface Preface: Why Revise our 2020 Vision? The first edition of 2020 Vision was produced after the formation of the Chesterfield Canal Partnership in 1995. This was subsequently revised and a second edition produced in 1999. It is this second edition which has provided a compass for the direction of the Partnership over the last six years. In that time a very great deal has been achieved and it is now appropriate to update our “2020 Vision”. Given the extent of changes in waterways restoration, management and funding regimes, together with the numerous development studies undertaken by the Partnership, the document needs to provide a more comprehensive review than that undertaken in 1999. Notwithstanding these contextual adjustments, the fundamental ambitions of the Partnership remain essentially unchanged. This document sets out those aims and outlines the broad strategy of the Partnership for the restoration and development of the Chesterfield Canal. Councillor Brian Lucas, Derbyshire County Council, Chair of the Chesterfield Canal Partnership, 2003-2006. Contact For further information on the Chesterfield Canal Partnership please contact Dr Geraint Coles, Development Manager, Chesterfield Canal Partnership, The Old Parish Rooms, Church Street, Eckington, Derbyshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways.Pdf
    Society History Wales Copy Prohibited and Internet Park Reproduction Kiveton 2 Society History Wales Copy Prohibited and Internet Park Kiveton andRailways Wales around Reproduction Kiveton Alan Rowles 3 Society History Wales Copy Prohibited and Internet Park © Copyright Notice This book is producedReproduction as part of the Kiveton Park and Wales History Project 2007. All material in this book is copyright of Alan Rowles, unless otherwise stated. This version and the design work Kivetontherein is copyright of the Kiveton Park and Wales History Society, with acknowledgement to the editorial and design contributions of Holly Greenhalgh of Kiveton Creative and John Tanner as editor. No material can be used without express written permission. If you wish to use material found in this book, please email the History Society with your request. For an explanation of copyright laws and how they apply to the internet please go to: http://www.intellectual-property.gov.uk/faq/copyright/internet.htm Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) can result in civil or criminal prosecution. 4 CONTENTS Introduction and Acknowledgements 7 The Coming of the Railways 13 Kiveton Park Station Society15 Charles Peace 18 The Midland Railway Branch 20 Lines that might have been History 22 Kiveton Bridge Station 23 The Waleswood Curve and Waleswood Station 28 Wales Copy Epilogue Prohibited 33 and Internet Park Reproduction Kiveton 5 Society History Wales Copy Prohibited and Internet Park Reproduction Kiveton 6 Series Editor’s Introduction The railways have been crucial to the social and economic evolution of this corner of South Yorkshire and acted as the major spur behind the positioning of the deep pits at both Kiveton Park and Waleswood.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Railway for Freight and National Passenger Operators 2 MB
    Digital Railway for Freight and National Passenger Operators July 2019 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Final Abbreviations & Definitions Acronym Meaning AFO Adjacent Facility Owner ATO Automatic Train Operation CDAS Connected Driver Advisory System CMSP Continuous Modular Strategic Planning CP Control Period DR Digital Railway ECML East Coast Main Line EMU Electric Multiple Unit ERTMS European Rail Traffic Management System ETCS European Train Control System FIC / FiC First In Class FNPO Freight & National Passenger Operators – throughout this report this refers to the Freight and Train Operating Companies that are aligned with the Network Rail FNPO route FNS Freight Network Study FOC Freight Operating Company FY Financial Year GB Great Britain HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle HS2 High Speed 2 LTDP Long Term Deployment Plan LTPP Long Term Planning Process NPR Northern Powerhouse Rail NR Network Rail ORR Office of Rail & Road RBC Radio Block Control RDG Rail Delivery Group RIDC Rail Innovation & Development Centre RSL Rolling Stock Library RSSB Rail Safety & Standards Board Page 2 of 53 Final SEU Signalling Equivalent Unit SRFI Strategic Rail Freight Interchange STP Short Term Planning TfN Transport for the North TM Traffic Management TOC Train Operating Company TPR Timetable Planning Rules TRU Transpennine Route Upgrade VSTP Very Short-Term Planning WCML West Coast Main Line WTT Working Timetable Page 3 of 53 Final Contents Part A: Executive Summary ................................................................. 5 Part B: Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire County
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 To Holmfirth 351 Holme Greenfield DERBYSHIRE A Public Transport Map A Pennine Way 351 Trans Pennine Trail Mossley Trans Pennine Trail Woodhead M1 to Leeds Crowden Langsett Tameside Reservoir Hospital 236 Torside Underbank Ashton- 237 Pennine Reservoir Reservoir under- Stalybridge Bridleway 236 Lyne 237 l a Torside n a C Trans Pennine To Manchester 236 t Trail 351 s 237 e Guide r 237 Tintwistle o SOUTH YORKSHIRE Bridge F Bleaklow R k i a v e Broomhead e P r 237 Reservoir 236 D 237 Hollingworth o Flowery K n Hyde Padfield P A R Field Pennine A L North Hadfield Way O N B Newton Mottram A T I B 236 351 N 341 Godley Old T More Hall Hyde 341 Glossop I C Reservoir Hyde 341 Dinting T R Trans Pennine Central 341 341 394 I S Trail 341 341 D 341 K Upper Derwent 341 341 Hattersley 341 Gamesley A (Kings Tree) Glossop 236 P E 341 236,237 237 To GREATER Broadbottom 341 Manchester w ro 394 Simmondley MANCHESTER e th Charlesworth 61,341 E r Derwent Sheffield & South Woodley e 351,394 Sheffield v 394 orkshire Navigation Bredbury i Reservoir Y R 43,44,50,50A,53 Chisworth R 65,80,218,252 Romiley i Northern M18 to Doncaster 61 ve r Middlewood 271,272,273 General 394 Lo Hospital xl 274,275,X17,X30 ey Meadowhall Derwent Dams Lane Ends Grouse Inn m Goyt ra r rt e e iv p R u Marple 394 Derwent S To Stockport Marple Fairholmes S u Kinder p Riv e Bridge er r A H1 ,H2 t s r 358 Marple 61 ho L a Offerton p ad m yb Rosehill ow SOUTH 273 e Shalesmoor Marple Kinder r C Ulley C To Little Hayfield Reservoir H1 R e Country Stockport Goyt s 275 Trans R
    [Show full text]
  • Access Strategy
    Chesterfield Canal Partnership Access Strategy “Making the Chesterfield Canal Open and Accessible to All” First Edition 2006 Chesterfield Canal Access Strategy The Chesterfield Canal Partnership The Chesterfield Canal Partnership is made up of local authorities, statutory and non-statutory bodies, the voluntary sector and private enterprise, and is fully committed to the protection, restoration and development of the Chesterfield Canal. All members share the belief that the canal constitutes a major natural history and heritage feature, with the potential to significantly enhance the recreational, tourism and business life of the region. The Partnership works to protect and enhance the natural history and historic value of the canal, whilst promoting the development of its business and amenity potential to benefit all sectors of the regional community. Partnership Aims • Restore the Chesterfield Canal to full navigation using, wherever possible, the historic route. • Explore the potential to create and develop a new navigable link between the Chesterfield Canal and the Sheffield & South Yorkshire Navigation. • Protect, conserve and enhance the natural and built heritage of the canal. • Improve and widen all forms of public access to the canal. • Promote the sustainable economic and social regeneration of the Chesterfield Canal corridor in order to improve the quality of life in surrounding communities. Contact For further information on the Chesterfield Canal Partnership please contact Dr Geraint Coles, Development Manager, Chesterfield
    [Show full text]
  • Including Signalling)
    The R.C.T.S. is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation registered with The Charities Commission Registered No. 1169995. THE RAILWAY CORRESPONDENCE AND TRAVEL SOCIETY PHOTOGRAPHIC LIST LIST 6 - BUILDINGS & INFRASTRUCTURE (INCLUDING SIGNALLING) JULY 2019 The R.C.T.S. is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation registered with The Charities Commission Registered No. 1169995. www.rcts.org.uk VAT REGISTERED No. 197 3433 35 R.C.T.S. PHOTOGRAPHS – ORDERING INFORMATION The Society has a collection of images dating from pre-war up to the present day. The images, which are mainly the work of late members, are arranged in in fourteen lists shown below. The full set of lists covers upwards of 46,900 images. They are : List 1A Steam locomotives (BR & Miscellaneous Companies) List 1B Steam locomotives (GWR & Constituent Companies) List 1C Steam locomotives (LMS & Constituent Companies) List 1D Steam locomotives (LNER & Constituent Companies) List 1E Steam locomotives (SR & Constituent Companies) List 2 Diesel locomotives, DMUs & Gas Turbine Locomotives List 3 Electric Locomotives, EMUs, Trams & Trolleybuses List 4 Coaching stock List 5 Rolling stock (other than coaches) List 6 Buildings & Infrastructure (including signalling) List 7 Industrial Railways List 8 Overseas Railways & Trams List 9 Miscellaneous Subjects (including Railway Coats of Arms) List 10 Reserve List (Including unidentified images) LISTS Lists may be downloaded from the website http://www.rcts.org.uk/features/archive/. PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION Prints and images are now produced by ZenFolio via the website. Refer to the website (http://www.rcts.org.uk/features/archive/) for current prices and information. NOTES ON THE LISTS 1. Colour photographs are identified by a ‘C’ after the reference number.
    [Show full text]
  • CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan
    CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan June 2015 Contents – Introduction 3 – Changes to the plan 9 – List of Projects Rolled from CP4 10 – Summary 11 – England and Wales CP5 enhancement programme – England and Wales – funds 13 – England and Wales – projects – Cross route projects 38 – Electric spine 52 – Anglia 59 – Kent 68 – Sussex 75 – Wessex 77 – Western 92 – Wales 110 – LNE 113 – East Midlands 127 – LNW 130 – Scotland CP5 enhancement programme – Scotland – funds 141 – Scotland – projects 147 CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan Introduction Purpose The CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan sets out the outputs, scope and milestones that we are committed to deliver in CP5. It has an entry for every project and ring-fenced fund funded through PR13. It is used both by the regulator, to hold us to account, and by our customers and funders, to give them visibility of our plans. As well as describing our commitments through the periodic review, it also sets out the deliverables for other government sponsored enhancement schemes funded through the Investment Framework. The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) published the Final Determination on 31 October 2013. Network Rail accepted the Final Determination on 7 February 2014. This document is part of Network Rail’s response to the Final Determination. We have continued to develop our plans for Control Period 5. As we have refined our plans, elements have changed and we set out the changes from the draft plan in the ‘changes to the plan’ chapter later in the document. Change control and updates This document will be updated on a quarterly basis to report progress and to update projects where appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • East Derbyshire Greenway Strategy
    East Derbyshire Greenway Strategy Prepared for Derbyshire County Council by Land Use Consultants, Transport for Leisure and Les Lumsdon Supported by the Countryside Commission June 1998 14 Great George Street Bristol, BS1 5RH CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT ...................................................1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY.............................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH.............................................................................. 2 LAYOUT OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................. 2 2. OUTLINE OF THE STRATEGY ...........................................................3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 THE CONCEPT ................................................................................................................. 3 DEFINING A ROUTE HIERARCHY .................................................................................. 3 THE PROPOSED GREENWAY NETWORK..................................................................... 4 The Status of Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Routes .................................................... 5 The Northern Section of the Figure of Eight .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Trains Limited Complete Redacted
    Consolidated Copy as at 5th September 2013 TRACK ACCESS CONTRACT (PASSENGER SERVICES) Dated 11 November 2007 Between NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED and EAST MIDLANDS TRAINS LIMITED i East Midlands Trains Complete Redacted- TAC 05 September 2013- up to and including the 40th SA Consolidated Copy as at 5th September 2013 Amended By :- 1. First Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 12th November 2007 Nottingham-London Additional Train (EMT Launch Day Special) – EXPIRED 2. Second Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 23rd May 2008 Nottingham-Skegness Additional Bank Holiday Service & LHCS – EXPIRED 3. Third Supplemental Agreement Dated 10th July 2008 Additional Route to Tyseley, Nottingham-Skegness Summer Saturday & Bank Holiday LHCS and updated Schedule 7 CC Term – EXPIRED 4. Fourth Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 19th July 2008 Leicester-Scarborough Additional HST Service – EXPIRED 5. Fifth Supplemental Agreement Dated 25th July 2008 Termination of Fourth Supplemental Agreement – EXPIRED 6. Sixth Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 25th July 2008 Leicester-Scarborough Additional HST Service – EXPIRED 7. Seventh Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 15th August 2008 Addition of Class 222 DEMU to EM03 Service Group – EXPIRED 8. Eighth Supplemental Agreement Dated 11th December 2008 Principal Change Date (December) 2008 Timetable Changes. 9. Ninth Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 9th October 2008 Addition of Class 222 DEMU to EM01 Service Group (Nottingham-Lincoln) – EXPIRED 10. Tenth Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 25th November 2008 Amendment to Schedule 5 Para 2.8 adding HSTs for Lincoln Xmas Market – EXPIRED 11. Eleventh Supplemental Agreement (General Approval) Dated 28th November 2008 Interim Treatment of Access Charges Review for CP4.
    [Show full text]