Including Signalling)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rail Accident Report
Rail Accident Report Derailment of a passenger train at Ealing Broadway 2 March 2016 Report 24/2016 December 2016 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2016 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner. -
Ledbury to Gloucester Copy Better
Ledbury to Gloucester Railway Ledbury to Gloucester by rail Taken from David Postle’s book of the same name and is seen through the eyes of the Driver and Fireman of the last passenger train on the branch on the 11th July 1959. The driver was Jack Folley and the fireman Jim Kavanagh. Jim checked the fire again and looked at the pressure gauge, and decided that he ought to put a little more coal on the fire. He picked up his shovel, opened the fire hole doors and placed half a dozen shovelfuls round the firebox, turned on the injector again because he knew that shortly he would be stopping at Barber’s Bridge with a minute or two in hand to gain any pressure that might be lost by putting more water into the boiler. He picked up a little hand brush and swept the coal dust from the floorboards of the cab. ‘Even when the railway was opened, no attempt was made to advertise the new service. It wasn’t until the end of August that the G.W.R. advertised a summer excursion from Cheltenham to Malvern via Newest. The line was obviously considered important by some because, in the sales particulars of property on the market at that time, the proximity to the new railway was very often stressed’ ‘Did the railway look as though it might fulfil its potential’, asked Jim. ‘Early newspaper reports were very optimistic. The first five weeks saw over 2000 passengers booked at Newest and just over half that at Dymock.’ ‘Talking in the early days,’ said Jim, ‘the guard told me at Ledbury that we have an elderly gentleman on board who travelled on the first train, and here he is, on the last one over the Branch.’ ‘Is that right? I suppose it just goes to show how short-lived this Branch has been.’ ‘Whilst on the subject of people, did I tell you about Dick Nash?’ asked Jack. -
Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment
Engineering Procedure Signalling CRN SM 013 ROAD LEVEL CROSSING PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Version 2.0 Issued December 2013 Owner: Principal Signal Engineer Approved by: Stewart Rendell Authorised by: Glenn Dewberry Disclaimer. This document was prepared for use on the CRN Network only. John Holland Rail Pty Ltd makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems or work or operation. It is the document user’s sole responsibility to ensure that the copy of the document it is viewing is the current version of the document as in use by JHR. JHR accepts no liability whatsoever in relation to the use of this document by any party, and JHR excludes any liability which arises in any manner by the use of this document. Copyright. The information in this document is protected by Copyright and no part of this document may be reproduced, altered, stored or transmitted by any person without the prior consent of JHR. © JHR UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 1 of 66 Issued December 2013 Version 2.0 CRN Engineering Procedure - Signalling CRN SM 013 Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment Document control Revision Date of Approval Summary of change 1.0 June 1999 RIC Standard SC 07 60 01 00 EQ Version 1.0 June 1999. 1.0 July 2011 Conversion to CRN Signalling Standard CRN SM 013. 2.0 December 2013 Inclusion of Safetran S40 and S60 Mechanisms, reformatting of figures and tables, and updating text Summary of changes from previous version Section Summary of change All Include automated -
Rails by the Sea.Pdf
1 RAILS BY THE SEA 2 RAILS BY THE SEA In what ways was the development of the seaside miniature railway influenced by the seaside spectacle and individual endeavour from 1900 until the present day? Dr. Marcus George Rooks, BDS (U. Wales). Primary FDSRCS(Eng) MA By Research and Independent Study. University of York Department of History September 2012 3 Abstract Little academic research has been undertaken concerning Seaside Miniature Railways as they fall outside more traditional subjects such as standard gauge and narrow gauge railway history and development. This dissertation is the first academic study on the subject and draws together aspects of miniature railways, fairground and leisure culture. It examines their history from their inception within the newly developing fairground culture of the United States towards the end of the 19th. century and their subsequent establishment and development within the UK. The development of the seaside and fairground spectacular were the catalysts for the establishment of the SMR in the UK. Their development was largely due to two individuals, W. Bassett-Lowke and Henry Greenly who realized their potential and the need to ally them with a suitable site such as the seaside resort. Without their input there is no doubt that SMRs would not have developed as they did. When they withdrew from the culture subsequent development was firmly in the hands of a number of individual entrepreneurs. Although embedded in the fairground culture they were not totally reliant on it which allowed them to flourish within the seaside resort even though the traditional fairground was in decline. -
Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) Between
OFFICIAL Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) between (1) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (2) Abellio East Midlands Limited Dated: 01/09/2020 Conformed copy as at 12 February 2021 OFFICIAL Amended by: 1. 1st Supplemental Agreement dated 05 February 2021 2. 3rd Supplemental Agreement dated 12 February 2021 OFFICIAL Contents 1. Interpretation ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Network Code and Traction Electricity Rules .............................................................................. 7 3. Conditions precedent and duration ............................................................................................. 7 4. Standard of performance ............................................................................................................. 8 5. Permission to use ........................................................................................................................ 9 6. Operation and maintenance of trains and Network ...................................................................10 7. Track Charges and other payments ..........................................................................................11 8. Liability .......................................................................................................................................11 9. Not used ....................................................................................................................................11 -
The Battle for May Hill’ by Marion Shoard
‘The Battle for May Hill’ by Marion Shoard Published in the Newsletter of the Friends of the Dymock Poets, Issue no. 59, Summer 2013 May Hill is probably the most important geographical feature for the Friends of the Dymock Poets. The poets derived their inspiration from the countryside around them. As they walked and talked together along the field paths and lanes, they constantly got their bearings from that unmistakable, reassuring upturned saucer with its fuzz of pines atop – May Hill. As Edward Thomas recalled in his essay about the Dymock country, ‘This England’: ‘Again and again we saw, instead of solid things, dark or bright, never more than half a mile off, the complete broad dome of a high hill six miles distant, a beautiful hill itself, but especially seen thus, always unexpectedly, through gaps in this narrow country, as through a window’. Several FDP walks have taken in May Hill, where members have read aloud ‘Words’, the delightful poem which Edward Thomas composed from its slopes while on a cycling trip with John Haines, the Gloucester solicitor and amateur botanist who joined the poets on many of their walks-talks. In view of this connection, when FDP member Alexander Maltby, who lives on May Hill, contacted the FDP about a plan to build a five-bedroom mansion on an isolated site on its slopes, the committee was concerned. Alas, we do not have the capacity to check every planning application, so we can deal only with selected cases. Barbara Davis and I were the first committee members to go and visit the site, and this is the submission which Jeff Cooper, our chair, sent in on behalf of the FDP to Forest of Dean District Council, which will grant or withhold planning consent. -
London North Eastern Region Commentary 04
Timetable Planning Rules London North Eastern 2020 TIMETABLE Version 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 London North Eastern Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 322 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 5.1 Sectional Running Times .........................................74 1 Introduction and General Notes .................... 3 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs ...................................74 1.1 Index of Routes ............................................................. 4 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .......................................74 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .................. 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times75 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .............................................. 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Consisting of Passenger 1.2.2 Rule Book ................................................................ 7 Vehicles on Goods Lines ............................................75 1.3 Definitions ....................................................................... 9 5.2 Headways ......................................................................75 1.3.1 Train Classification .............................................. 9 5.2.1 Headway Values .................................................75 1.3.2 Days of Operation .............................................. -
WALES of IRELAND St John's Wales Wales and Prettytenby
Lerwick Kirkwall Dunnet Head Cape Wrath Duncansby Head Strathy Whiten Scrabster John O'Groats Rudha Rhobhanais Head Point (Butt of Lewis) Thurso Durness Melvich Castletown Port Nis (Port of Ness) Bettyhill Cellar Head Tongue Noss Head Wick Gallan Head Steornabhagh (Stornoway) Altnaharra Latheron Unapool Kinbrace Lochinver Helmsdale Hushinish Point Lairg Tairbeart Greenstone (Tarbert) Point Ullapool Rudha Reidh Bonar Bridge Tarbat Dornoch Ness Tain Gairloch Loch nam Madadh Lossiemouth (Lochmaddy) Alness Invergordon Cullen Fraserburgh Uig Cromarty Macduff Elgin Buckie Dingwall Banff Kinlochewe Garve Forres Nairn Achnasheen Torridon Keith Turriff Dunvegan Peterhead Portree Inverness Aberlour Huntly Lochcarron Dufftown Rudha Hallagro Stromeferry Ellon Cannich Grantown- Kyle of Lochalsh Drumnadrochit on-Spey Oldmeldrum Dornie Rhynie Kyleakin Loch Baghasdail Inverurie (Lochboisdale) Invermoriston Shiel Bridge Alford Aviemore Aberdeen Ardvasar Kingussie Invergarry Bagh a Chaisteil Newtonmore (Castlebay) Mallaig Laggan Ballater Banchory Braemar Spean Dalwhinnie Stonehaven Bridge Fort William Pitlochry Brechin Glencoe Montrose Tobermory Ballachulish Kirriemuir Forfar Aberfeldy Lochaline Portnacroish Blairgowrie Arbroath Craignure Dunkeld Coupar Angus Carnoustie Connel Killin Dundee Monifieth Oban Tayport Lochearnhead Newport Perth -on-Tay Fionnphort Crianlarich Crieff Bridge of Earn St Andrews SCOTLAND Auchterarder Auchtermuchty Cupar Inveraray Ladybank Fife Ness Callander Falkland Strachur Tarbet Dunblane Kinross Bridge Elie of Allan Glenrothes -
JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. -
Retro Underground: the Seventies to the Noughties – 3
RETRO UNDERGROUND: THE SEVENTIES TO THE NOUGHTIES – 3. OTHER EVENTS by Tony Morgan My earliest memories of the Underground are during the Second World War travelling from Kingsbury on the Bakerloo Line into London and sometimes on to Kent on the Southern Railway to visit relations. In 1968, after ten years of driving to North Acton, I started commuting in to Great Portland Street. While I was there the second section of the Victoria Line opened as far as Warren Street. One lunchtime I decided to have a quick trip on it. The 1967 Stock train came in to reverse back. The Train Operator was standing in the cab with his back to the direction of travel as the ATO stopped the train. Maybe this was being done to build confidence in the new control system. Travelling home one day from Great Portland Street I saw the latest LT Magazine on display in the ticket office. I then started buying it on a regular basis. The front cover of that first edition had a photograph of the C69 Stock about to be introduced on the Circle Line on it. From that magazine I found out about ‘The Last Drop’ event at Neasden Depot, on Sunday 6 June 1971 advertised, which celebrated the end of use of steam locomotives for engineers’ operations. There I joined the Society because of their Sales Stand. This was my first organised event. At this event all three remaining locomotives were in steam. L94 hauled a rake of engineers’ vehicles from the City and pulled into one of two Klondyke Sidings in Neasden depot. -
Railway Seaside Holiday Posters Along the Scenic Coast From
Railway Seaside Holiday Posters along the Scenic Coast from Scarborough to Whitby Including a brief history of the Railway Line and its Stations By Stephen Riley The Scarborough and Whitby Railway line followed a difficult but scenic route along the North Yorkshire coast. It eventually opened on 16th July 1885 long after the first proposal to open a line between Scarborough and Whitby in 1848. One of the problems in building a line was the hilly topography and many of the early schemes failed because of the difficulty finding an economic route and raising sufficient capital to construct the line. Before this time the coast between Scarborough and Whitby was rarely visited by holidaymakers and Robin Hood’s Bay was a relatively unknown fishing village. A bill was put before Parliament and received Royal Assent on 5th July 1865 authorising the incorporation of the Scarborough & Whitby Railway. Their planned line was not started due to insufficient finance. In 1870 a new route was proposed and this time funds became available, construction work starting on 3rd June 1872. Progress was exceedingly slow and by 1877 work on the line came to a halt when insufficient capital could not be raised to complete it and the original engineer and contractor pulled out. The work resumed in June 1881 with the appointment of new contractors John Waddell & Son under new engineers, Sir Charles Fox & Sons who completed the line, included the building of a 13-arch red brick viaduct over the River Esk near Whitby. The official opening of the Scarborough & Whitby Railway (S&WR) took place a day before public services commenced, on 15 July 1885, with a special train for the directors of the company and dignitaries from Scarborough and Whitby. -
Irse News Issue 161 November 2010 Irse Careers Page and Job Board
IRSE NEWS ISSUE 161 NOVEMBER 2010 IRSE CAREERS PAGE AND JOB BOARD The IRSE Careers site is now live at www.irse.org/careers Here you can view signalling job vacancies, fi nd out about other careers options, and contact recruiting companies to help you fi nd the next step in your career. For more information on the advertising and branding opportunities available, please contact Joe Brooks on +44 (0)20 657 1801 or [email protected]. Front Cover: Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern train Second 170, bound from Minneapolis, Minnesota to Kansas City, Missouri, passes the radio-activated switch at the north siding switch Eckards, Iowa, on 4 October 2009. This is one of several locations on the DM&E system where radio-activated switches are used to expedite train operations without the expense of a full Centralized Traffic Control (CTC) installation. Photo by Jon Roma NEWS VIEW 161 Let’s plan for the future IRSE NEWS is published monthly by the Institution of The UK Government has unveiled their spending review during October, pledging to Railway Signal Engineers (IRSE). The IRSE is not as a invest more than 30 billion pounds on transport projects over the next four years, with body responsible for the opinions expressed in IRSE NEWS. this sector seen as a particular key driver for economic growth and productivity. © Copyright 2010, IRSE. All rights reserved. This includes 14 billion pounds of funding that will go to Network Rail to support No part of this publication may be reproduced, maintenance and investment, including improvements to the East Coast Main Line, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any station upgrades around the West Midlands and signal replacement programmes in form or by any means without the permission in writing of the publisher.