• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Valdai Discussion Club Report Toward the Great Ocean – 6: People, History, Ideology, Education Rediscovering the Identity valdaiclub.com #valdaiclub September 2018 This publication and other Valdai reports are available on http://valdaiclub.com/a/reports/ The views and opinions expressed in this Reports are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. ISBN 978-5-906757-77-7 © The Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, 2018 42 Bolshaya Tatarskaya st., Moscow, 115184, Russia This report was prepared in an unusual way, unlike previous reports. Rather than being written in Moscow, it is the result of close collaboration with academics and public fi gures in the Russian Far East. Its leading contributor, Prof. Leonid Blyakher of Pacifi c National University, wrote it jointly with his Moscow colleagues. The draft version of the report underwent discussion according to the rules of the situational analysis by orientalists, international relations experts, and philosophers from a number of cities in Siberia and the Russian Far East, as well as St. Petersburg and Moscow. Authors made liberal use of their ideas and critical comments and regard them as co-authors. The Valdai Discussion Club and the authors of this report are grateful to the participants of the situational analysis for their substantial contribution to the research: Boris Beloborodov Alexander Druzhinin Associate professor at the Department of Research assistant at the Center for Sinology, Amur State University, Chair of the Amur Comprehensive European and International Regional Offi ce of small and medium business Studies (CCEIS), National Research University NGO Opora Russia Higher School of Economics Leonid Blyakher Sergei Karaganov Head of the Department for Philosophy and Dean of the Faculty of World Economy and Culture Studies, Pacifi c National University, International Affairs at the National Research Khabarovsk University Higher School of Economics, Honorary Chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy Timofei Bordachev Director of the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS), Svyatoslav Kaspe National Research University Higher School of Professor at the School of Political Science, Economics, Programme Director at the Valdai National Research University Higher School of Discussion Club Economics Yuri Vasilyev Alexander Levintal Special correspondent at online media outlet Governor of the Jewish Autonomous Region Vzglyad (Взгляд.ру) Anastasia Likhacheva Konstantin Grigorichev Deputy Director for Research at the Center for Vice-rector for Research and International Comprehensive European and International Cooperation, Irkutsk State University Studies (CCEIS), National Research University Higher School of Economics Alexander Lomanov Victor Sukhanov Chief Researcher at the ‘ Russia–China’ Center, Chairperson of the Primorye Regional Offi ce of Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy the Russian Union of Journalists of Sciences Tatyana Urzhumtseva Aleksey Maslov Director of the Center for the Study of China and Head of the School of Asian Studies, Faculty of the Asia-Pacifi c Region, Saint-Petersburg State World Economy and International Affairs, National University of Economics Research University Higher School of Economics Sergei Shapiguzov Boris Mezhuev Managing partner at FBK Grant Thornton Editor-in-chief of online media outlet Politanalitika (Политаналитика), Associate Roman Shirokov professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Rear admiral of the Pacifi c Fleet Moscow State University Vyacheslav Shuper Maksim Mihalyov Leading researcher at the Institute of Geography, Head of the East Asia Department at the Centre Russian Academy of Sciences for Crisis Society Studies (Centero), Moscow Ekaterina Entina Leonid Slutsky Deputy Dean at the Faculty of World Economy Chairperson of the State Duma Committee on and International Affairs, National Research International Affairs University Higher School of Economics The authors also express gratitude to the outstanding Russian orientalist, Prof. Vladimir Malyavin of the Graduate Institute of European Studies at TamKang University, Taiwan, and to the prominent Russian historian and philosopher, Prof. Alexei Miller of European University at St. Petersburg, for their written comments. There were many people who offered ideas, but responsibility for the fi nal text, including its defects, lies entirely with the executive editor. About the Authors Sergei Karaganov Executive Editor and Project Leader Timofei Bordachev Deputy Executive Editor About the authors: Leonid Blyakher Lead Author, Head of the Department for Philosophy and Culture Studies, Pacifi c National University, Khabarovsk Timofei Bordachev Director of the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS), National Research University Higher School of Economics, Programme Director at the Valdai Discussion Club Alexander Druzhinin Academic Secretary for the Project, Research Assistant at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS), National Research University Higher School of Economics Sergei Karaganov Dean of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Honorary Chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy Contents 5 Introduction and Summary 9 What Has Been Done 17 A New Stage in Russia’s Turn to the East 22 Why Turn to the East? 26 Russia as the ‘Assembly Point’ for Greater Eurasia 34 Myths, Phobias and Translating Asia into Russian 43 What Needs to Be Done #1. The Russian Far East and More 51 What Needs to Be Done #2. Turn to the East for the Whole of Russia: Get to Know Asia 57 Summing Up Introduction and Summary The sixth report in the Toward the Great Ocean series is distinct from all the previous reports, which sought to prove the expedience and usefulness of Russia’s Turn to the East mostly from economic, transport and geostrategic points of view. Solutions were suggested precisely in these areas. One of the reports was dedicated to the concept of the Greater Eurasian Partnership from Lisbon to Jakarta, Shanghai, or Tokyo.1 This report focuses on people, history, ideology, and education. It also covers the ideas behind Russia’s Turn to the East, as well as its media and spiritual aspects. The fi rst stage of Russia’s turn to the rising Asia is underway, with the Russian Far East advancing twice as fast as the rest of the country (although this is still not enough). Dozens of big plants are opening. Yet, today we can see more clearly the limitations that were not as obvious before. Eastern Russia’s development has not yet become a clear and common cause for the nation at large – the nation that is in dire need of grand projects. Neither do many Far Eastern residents really believe in it, with the outfl ow of people from the area, though having reduced, is continuing to this day. The goal is to formulate a fundamentally new way of engaging the people living in Russian Asia – the Far East and Siberia – who have interacted with their neighbours for centuries, who know and are able to comprehend them well. Furthermore, Russians in general should change their attitude to country’s Turn to the East, where the economic, technological and cultural markets of the future lie. 1 These issues were discussed in ‘Toward the Great Ocean’ (2012–2018) reports, particularly in ‘Toward the Great Ocean – 5: From the Turn to the East to Greater Eurasia’ (2017). 6 Valdai Discussion Club Report September, 2018 Once the sole source of advanced technology and capital since the 16th and 17th centuries, Europe is rapidly losing this status to Asia, which is also quickly coming to be regarded as the global centre of business activity. While 40 years ago, the centre of gravity in the world economy was located somewhere in the Atlantic to the west of Ireland, it is currently in Turkey and will reach the India–China border some 10 years from now. In hindsight, 2014 may become a year of not just the end of the Western alliances’ expansion, but also the end of the Petrine period in Russian history. Russia is to live side by side with Europe, be on friendly terms with it as far as possible, and borrow what is still of interest and needed for development. But it is unlikely to will remain a beacon for Russia, whose turn towards Europe and its technologies in the 17th and 18th centuries was logical. Asia was far away and entering a period of relative decline at that time, in part due to a better armed Europe embarking on colonial expansion. Today, the situation is changing, and it is Asia that will emerge as the crucial external source of capital and advanced technologies. Russians still do not recognise their country’s role as midwife of history and the way it infl uenced the rise of Asia and other emerging centres of power. It was Russia/USSR that ended the West’s almost 500-year military superiority, which was the basis of the Western economic, political and cultural dominance since the 16th or 17th century. The nuclear parity that was achieved and has been maintained makes it impossible for anyone to win a major war. The world has become more free and democratic, and Asian nations have been given an opportunity to make use of their competitive advantages. And we are not heading East empty- handed. We bring not only resources and transportation capacities, but also act as the major provider and guarantor of international security. More importantly, we have an opportunity to establish close cooperation with Asia without breaking off ties with Europe and to become the centre of the Greater Eurasian Partnership, which has been proposed by Moscow and backed by Beijing as being by 90 per cent in agreement with its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). There are still many problems on the way to Greater Eurasia. This report seeks to fi nd solutions to a set of these problems.

Load more

  63

Copy Link