DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments on the DGEIS / Amended GPP Submitted Through LMDC Website

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comments on the DGEIS / Amended GPP Submitted Through LMDC Website Comments on the DGEIS / Amended GPP Submitted through LMDC Website Development Comments # name organization profile category address city_stat telephone email comments dt_rec fname lname city state zip e_zip 1 Joseph NULL Survivor of Other 375 South End 212/321-3328 [email protected] Constructing a tunnel (of any length) under West Street will 3/14/04 Joseph Parent New NY 10280- Parente 9/11 Avenue, Apt. m be a nightmare for the residents of our Battery Park City 10:27 e York 1080 26-S community. Travel in and out of the area will be next to PM impossible - cabs will refuse to come down here as they did long after the attack on the WTC. Foot traffic will be impeded and our long-standing businesses will be driven out. The environmental impact will also be enormous - noise, pollution, etc. will cause even more residents to flee the area. And, just looking at other such tunnels in the city, the final result will be an ugly, unhealthy, unsafe mess for all of us down here. We all are trying to get our lives back to "normal" as much as that is possible, but this idiotic idea, and outrageous waste of money that many experts agree will provide no improvement in traffic flow will surely make any normalcy a fiction. Also, the Gateway buildings' common areas (hallways, rugs, etc.) were never replaced, and the venting systems not cleaned. The money for this ridiculous tunnel should be used to take care of these health issues. 2 Michael R Ramapo Resident of Neighborho 505 Ramapo 201-684-7745 medelste@ram TESTIMONY ON THE LMDC FGEIS Michael R. Edelstein, 3/14/04 Michael Edelst Mah NJ 7430 Edelstein College of NYC outside ods Valley Road apo.edu Ph.D. Ramapo College of New Jersey I wish to make several 9:01 R ein wah New Jersey of Lower brief comments on the LMDC FGEIS. 1. Both NEPA and PM Manhattan SEQR place a high value on public input. Given the length and scope of this document, the public was not afforded sufficient time and access to the document before the public hearing. 2. The FGEIS poses as a criteria for significant impact whether the effects of the rebuilding of lower Manhattan will result in impacts in excess of those present at the time of the World Trade Center. However, because the World Trade Center was not subject to an Environmental Impact Statement and significant effects were caused by that project, the LMDC position is not appropriate. Therefore, the LMDC FGEIS and subsequent site-specific proposals must consider impacts of redevelopment projects in and of themselves, not just when they are viewed as exceeding conditions present at the dawn of 9/11. As one case of many in point, the fact that fish were killed by the intake of cooling water at the World Trade Center does not create a threshhold for considering fish kills due to the rebuilding effort. Such potential impacts should be mitigated as de novo effects and the decisions of rebuilding should be framed such that the decision makers might decide not to carry out an action even though the impacts that serve as the basis for denial are less than the impacts caused by the World Trade Center but are nevertheless deemed significant. 3. There is lacking in the FGEIS any comprehensive assessment of the impacts of the disaster on the community, a necessary baseline assessment, and, therefore, the potential role of the proposed rebuilding projects in mitigating these impacts. Specifically, there is only minimal consideration of the impacts on the community of the rebuilding effort, particularly in light of the impacts to the community of the disaster and of subsequent community changes. How have individuals and core local institutions been impacted by changes in perceived 1226348.1 # name organization profile category address city_stat telephone email comments dt_rec fname lname city state zip e_zip health, economic viability, trust, personal and community control, community character, livability, and safety and can these values be restored by the proposed project and the way it is carried out? 4. Despite an effort to provide some degree of cumulative impact assessment, there are many changes pending in the community that need to be considered but have not been. All known and anticipated changes should be incorporated into the cumulative assessment. 5. Although sustainability issues are discussed, they are restricted to the matter of how green the new buildings will be. Clearly, some exciting innovations in green building design are contemplated. However, the promotion of sustainability incorporates much more than green buildings. The proper consideration of the FGEIS should instead focus upon how the rebuilding effort in Lower Manhattan can promote this area as a sustainable community. 3 Charles NULL Resident of Other 21 South End 212-786-0443 cwkerner@cris. I urge you to proceed with the plan to route the high volume 3/14/04 Charles Kerner New NY 10280 Kerner Lower Ave. PH1G com of through-traffic on West St. below grade in a tunnel. BPC 8:27 York Manhattan would be an even better place with the Brooklyn and FDR PM south of bound traffic out of sight and not causing safety and Houston environmental problems in our neighborhood and at the new Street, memorial site. The tunnel should ideally connect with the BP Owner of Underpass, but costs for this may be too high. The real estate incremental construction effort is not the huge deal the anti- in Lower development zealots make it to be. Manhattan 4 Helene BPCUnited NULL NULL 377 Rector 212 945-4979 HZSeeman@ao I am opposed to the West St. tunnel.It will wreck havoc for 3/14/04 Helene Seem NYC NULL NULL Seeman Place l.com many years.Why build another underground structure when 8:12 an 1028 street level will suffice beautifully.Why create another bathtub PM 0 problem in a fragile environment?I am also concerned about the other construction issues: trucks need to be retrofitted so emissions are not as harmful,air needs to be continually monitored AND a system of reporting regularly to neighborhood watchdog groups set up. 5 brian bcm Owner of WTC Site 377 rector pl NULL bcmfutures@ho I just wanted to make a statement that I oppose the 3/14/04 brian massa ny ny 10280 massa commodities real estate Planning 19e tmail.com construction of a tunnel at the west street location. There are 6:18 in Lower many reasons to not build which Im sure you are aware of. PM Manhattan The most obvious though is yet another target for terrorist attack. Also the massive traffic jams that will be caused for 6 years or for however long it would take to build. This is something that is completely unnecessary and a waste of time and money. 6 Paul NULL Commuter Transportat 3 Manor Road 203 775-1787 paul.liubicich@ I am a commodities broker at the NY Board of Trade in the 3/14/04 Paul Liubici Broo Conne 6804 Liubicich to Lower ion gte.net Mercantile Exchange building in the Financial Center. I am 5:50 ch kfield cticut Manhattan against building the West St. tunnel. It will adversely affect PM my commute for many years. 7 Janice C. Battery Park NULL Other 380 Rector 212-945-9167 Jansmith380@ I am opposed to the tunnel planned for the West Street 3/14/04 Janice Smith New NY 10280 Smith City resident Place, Apt. 21 J aol.com portion in front of the WTC. It is too costly a project for such 4:02 C. York questionable worth. Also, the additional construction in PM Battery Park City will be unbearable. 1226348.1 # name organization profile category address city_stat telephone email comments dt_rec fname lname city state zip e_zip 8 Robert none NULL Other 70 Battery Place 212.204.6385 [email protected] Please know that my wife and I, who have been residents of 3/14/04 Robert Mabry New NY 10280 Mabry om Battery Park since Mar 02, are opposed to the tunnel 3:16 York proposal for West St. When we moved down to Battery Park PM from the upper east side to be a part of the re-building of Lower Manhattan, this was not what we had in mind. We see few if any long term benefits that would justify the expense, disruption, and segmentation of our community by this proposal, and we sincerely hope that you will reconsider this "big dig". 9 Benjamin NULL Resident of Other 79 Sullivan (212) 925-6133 gothamexcelsio It appears to me that your Draft Generic Environmental 3/14/04 Benjami Hemri New NY 10012 Hemric Lower Street [email protected] Impact Statement is overlooking a number of very important 2:57 n c York Manhattan u possible negative impacts of the proposed redevelopment of PM south of Lower Manhattan and the city at large. Thus I hope further Houston efforts will examine the following: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC 1) Street For the almost thirty years that the WTC site blocked off Greenwich, it provided a method of traffic evaporation in Lower Manhattan, similar to the evaporation that happed in Greenwich Village with the closing of Fifth Ave. through Washington Sq. Park. What negative impacts of increased traffic will a Greenwich St. re-opened to vehicular traffic have? 2) Will opening Greenwich St. to vehicular traffic THROUGH "Ground Zero" have a negative affect on traffic in Lower Manhattan by attracting addtional automobiles and buses to Lower Manhattan as people try to see "Ground Zero" from inside a bus or to show "Ground Zero" to out-of- town friends and relatives? 3) Will the absence of a screening building on West St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems
    Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems OSHA 3256-09R 2015 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards- related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibilities which are set forth in OSHA standards and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Moreover, because interpretations and enforcement policy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877-889-5627. This guidance document is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations. It contains recommendations as well as descriptions of mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS an OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT
    Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS AN OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT Pictured: 315 Meserole Street Looking Ahead U.S. Treasury Releases Additional Opportunity Zones Guidelines On April 17th the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a highly anticipated second set of proposed regulations related to the new Opportunity Zone (OZ) tax incentive. Created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the tax benefi t is designed to drive economic development and create jobs by encouraging long-term investments in economically distressed communities nationwide according to the Treasury department’s press release. The latest 169-page release reportedly delivered guidance in a broader range of areas than many expected, hoping to provide investors who have been on the fence with the clarity needed to begin developing projects in distressed areas nationwide. Some government offi cials anticipate the program could spur $100 billion in new investment into the more than 8,762 zones nationwide, of which 306 are located in New York City; however there exist some concerns among critics that the program will incentivize gentrifi cation, or provide added benefi t to developers for projects they would have been pursued anyway. According to the press release by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a key part of the newly released guidance clarifi es the “substantially all” requirements for the holding period and use of the tangible business property: • For use of the property, at least 70% of the property must be used in a qualifi ed OZ. • For the holding period of the property, tangible property must be qualifi ed opportunity zone business property for at least 90% of the Qualifi ed Opportunity Fund’s (QOF) or qualifi ed OZ business’s holding period.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Trade Center, Then the World's Tallest Building, Was Built in Lower Manhattan in the Early 1970'S (Figure K – Su
    Bedrock Control of a Boulder-Filled Valley Under the World Trade Center Site Cheryl J. Moss, Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, 14 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10122 ([email protected]), and, Charles Merguerian, Geology Department, 114 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549 ([email protected]; [email protected]) INTRODUCTION Then the world’s tallest buildings, the former World Trade Center Twin Towers were built in lower Manhattan in the early 1970’s. A new construction technology at the time, a slurry wall socketed into the bedrock was built to enable the Twin Towers construction. A geotechnical investigation undertaken for the project suggested that the site geology would be fairly typical for New York City. During construction of the slurry wall, however, an unexpected feature was discovered. In the southeast corner of the site the wall cut through a ledge of schistose bedrock and entered a curved, roughly E-W-trending valley filled with well- rounded glacial boulders and cobbles (Figure 1). The slurry wall had to be excavated deeper in two places to get through the boulders and socket back into solid bedrock. The trend of the valley is unusual because other known glacial valleys across Manhattan trend NW-SE including a nearby valley we reported on earlier (Moss and Merguerian 2006). When it was time to plan reconstruction of the new World Trade Center development, it was clear that extra attention would have to be focused on the southeast quadrant. The unusual geologic conditions present could pose significant difficulties for new design and construction. A more extensive boring program was undertaken by Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, geotechnical engineers for the WTC Memorial and Towers 1, 2, 3 and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • APC WTC Thesis V8 090724
    A Real Options Case Study: The Valuation of Flexibility in the World Trade Center Redevelopment by Alberto P. Cailao B.S. Civil Engineering, 2001 Wentworth Institute of Technology Submitted to the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2009 ©2009 Alberto P. Cailao All rights reserved. The author hereby grants MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author________________________________________________________________________ Center for Real Estate July 24, 2009 Certified by_______________________________________________________________________________ David Geltner Professor of Real Estate Finance, Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by_____________________________________________________________________________ Brian A. Ciochetti Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development A Real Options Case Study: The Valuation of Flexibility in the World Trade Center Redevelopment by Alberto P. Cailao Submitted to the Center for Real Estate on July 24, 2009 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development Abstract This thesis will apply the past research and methodologies of Real Options to Tower 2 and Tower 3 of the World Trade Center redevelopment project in New York, NY. The qualitative component of the thesis investigates the history behind the stalled development of Towers 2 and 3 and examines a potential contingency that could have mitigated the market risk. The quantitative component builds upon that story and creates a hypothetical Real Options case as a framework for applying and valuing building use flexibility in a large-scale, politically charged, real estate development project.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Disappeared'
    ‘The disappeared’ Power over the dead in the aftermath of 9/11 Chip Colwell- The issue of disposition of and control over human way by family, these remains point to disappeared individ- Chanthaphonh remains is a sensitive subject in all human societies, usu- uals, left in limbo as the result of a terrorist attack. The fol- Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh ally marked by taboos and rituals. That the unidentified lowing article by Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh, advocate is Curator of Anthropology at human remains from the World Trade Center destruction for four 9/11 family advocacy groups, receives a response the Denver Museum of Nature should generate controversy is therefore not surprising. from Alice M. Greenwald, director of the 9/11 Memorial and Science. Since 2009, he has been an adviser to four Without the possibility of burial or cremation in the usual Museum. Editor 9/11 family advocacy groups, which have sought to consult On the morning of 11 September 2001, Scott Kopytko, with the 9/11 Museum on the human-remains issue. His a 32-year-old firefighter, was returning to his station in email is [email protected]. New York’s South Street Seaport just as fire engines were pulling out. Scott had been a firefighter for almost three years. It was the happiest period of his life. Though he was just coming back, no doubt exhausted, from a night shift, Scott soon realized that something big was happening on that bright September morning. He felt a duty to join his fellow firefighters, and as his vehicle was leaving, he told a probationary firefighter, ‘Get off, you’re in my spot’, leaping on in the rookie’s place.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Secular Relics: World Trade Center Steel in Off-Site 9/11 Memorials in the United States
    SACRED SECULAR RELICS: WORLD TRADE CENTER STEEL IN OFF-SITE 9/11 MEMORIALS IN THE UNITED STATES by Senem Guler-Biyikli B.A. in Business Administration, Koç University, 2008 M.A. in Anatolian Civilizations & Cultural Heritage Management, Koç University, 2010 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2017 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Senem Guler-Biyikli It was defended on December 5, 2016 and approved by Bryan K. Hanks, Associate Professor, Anthropology Laura C. Brown, Assistant Professor, Anthropology Kirk Savage, Professor, History of Art & Architecture Dissertation Advisor: Robert M. Hayden, Professor, Anthropology ii Copyright © by Senem Guler-Biyikli 2017 iii SACRED SECULAR RELICS: WORLD TRADE CENTER STEEL IN OFF-SITE 9/11 MEMORIALS IN THE UNITED STATES Senem Guler-Biyikli, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2017 This dissertation analyzes material practices in the commemoration of violence and trauma through a focus on the memorialization of World Trade Center (WTC) structural steel across the United States to form hundreds of local 9/11 monuments. Less than one percent of the steel artifacts collected from the WTC site was reconfigured as sacred relics and became the focal elements of local memorials, while the rest was sold and recycled as scrap. Based on ten months of fieldwork at such local memorials primarily in the Northeastern United States, the study documents the artifacts’ memorialization, and discusses the socio-cultural factors involved in their transformation from rubble to sacred relics.
    [Show full text]
  • As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape
    ID NAME: Nxxx,2004-07-04,A,024,Bs-BW,E2 3 7 15 25 50 75 85 93 97 24 Ø N THE NEW YORK TIMES METRO SUNDAY, JULY 4, 2004 CITY A Status Report: As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape By DAVID W. DUNLAP and GLENN COLLINS Below are projects in and around ground DEVELOPMENT PLAN zero and where they stood as of Friday. Embassy Goldman Suites Hotel/ Sachs Bank of New York BUILDINGS UA Battery Park Building Technology and On the World Trade Center site City theater site 125 Operations Center PARKS GREENWICH ST. 75 Park Place Barclay St. 101 Barclay St. (A) FREEDOM TOWER / TOWER 1 2 MURRAY ST. Former site of 6 World Trade Center, the 6 United States Custom House 0Feet 200 Today, the cornerstone will be laid for this WEST BROADWAY skyscraper, with about 60,000 square feet of retail space at its base, followed by 2.6 mil- Fiterman Hall, lion square feet of office space on 70 stories, 9 Borough of topped by three stories including an obser- Verizon Building Manhattan PARK PL. vation deck and restaurants. Above the en- 4 World 140 West St. Community College closed portion will be an open-air structure Financial 3 5 with wind turbines and television antennas. Center 7 World The governor’s office is a prospective ten- VESEY ST. BRIDGE Trade Center 100 Church St. ant. Occupancy is expected in late 2008. The WASHINGTON ST. 7 cost of the tower, apart from the infrastruc- 3 World 8 BARCLAY ST. ture below, is estimated at $1 billion to $1.3 Financial Center billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating the Mega-Rebuilding Deal at the World Trade Center: the Historical Context
    NEGOTIATING THE MEGA-REBUILDING DEAL AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT ALEX GARVIN * The decline of lower Manhattan as a business district relative to Midtown (and other United States business districts) became apparent after World War II. In the decade between 1947 and 1956, 15.1 million square feet of new office space— more than existed in the Loop in Chicago, the nation‘s second largest office district—was erected in Midtown. During that time, only 1.1 million square feet of office space was erected in lower Manhattan in three modest office structures and one six-story addition.1 The situation was so serious that in 1952, the Journal of Commerce published articles predicting that businesses would soon relocate from lower Manhattan to Midtown.2 The attempt to revive Lower Manhattan is central to an understanding of the World Trade Center. The first significant post-war revival effort came in November of 1955, when the Chase Manhattan Bank (under the leadership of David Rockefeller) announced that it would consolidate its nine-building, 8,700-employee operations on the two blocks bounded by Nassau, Liberty, William, and Pine Streets. The scheme that emerged was a superblock designed by the firm of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. A one-block section of Cedar Street was closed, creating a 2.5- acre site to be shared by a new 60-story, 1.7 million-square-foot office slab; the existing 38-story building that had housed Chase headquarters since 1928; and a new, spacious plaza. Between 1960, when the new Chase Manhattan Bank Building was ready for occupancy, and 1972, the year before World Trade Center was officially dedicated, * Alexander Garvin is President and CEO of Alex Garvin & Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMERCIAL Experience 130 Liberty Street, Deutsche Bank Building | New York, NY
    COMMERCIAL experience 130 Liberty Street, deutsche bank building | New York, NY 15-story gash created from WTC debris on 9/11 In April 2010, LVI completed the deconstruction to the 18th floor In January 2008, LVI began decontamination and decon- 26 Stories, 1.1 Million Square Foot of Unoccupied 40-Story struction of the remaining 26 stories of the Deutsche Bank Commercial High-Rise Building Building at 130 Liberty Street in Lower Manhattan, which January 2008 – February 2011 was badly damaged from the collapse of 2 World Trade $95,000,000 Abatement Center during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. $25,000,000 Demolition After sitting derelict for five years following 9/11, the building was deemed unsal- Bovis Lend Lease vageable. Another contractor began abatement and deconstruction of the 40-story building in 2006, and deconstructed to the 26th floor. After a fire in August 2007, which left extensive smoke and water damage, LVI was brought in to finish the job. Demolition DECONTAMINATION OF A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT Hazardous Material Abatement LVI’s first task was to remediate the smoke and fire damage. Phase I for the cleaning and decontamination of the remaining floors completed in September 2009. Concrete Recycling Conditions were toxic. On 9/11, the building’s facade endured a 15-story gash from the propelled debris. The gaping hole exposed the interior of the building to the debris ash from the felled WTC towers. Open exposure to rain and snow plus the 300 Workers, Multiple Shifts building’s own sprinkler system added excessive water inside the building creating 6 Days Per Week unabated black mold growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Health Impacts from September 11: a Review of Treatment, Diagnosis, and Monitoring Efforts Hearing
    S. HRG. 110–197 LONG-TERM HEALTH IMPACTS FROM SEPTEMBER 11: A REVIEW OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND MONITORING EFFORTS HEARING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON EXAMINING A REVIEW OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND MONITORING EFFORTS, FOCUSING ON THE LONG-TERM HEALTH IMPACTS FROM SEPTEMBER 11 MARCH 21, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 34–458 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 16:08 Jul 30, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\34458.TXT SLABOR1 PsN: DENISE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming, TOM HARKIN, Iowa JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico RICHARD BURR, North Carolina PATTY MURRAY, Washington JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah BARACK OBAMA, Illinois PAT ROBERTS, Kansas BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado SHERROD BROWN, Ohio TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma J. MICHAEL MYERS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel KATHERINE BRUNETT MCGUIRE, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 16:08 Jul 30, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\DOCS\34458.TXT SLABOR1 PsN: DENISE CONTENTS STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007 Page Kennedy, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • View the 130 Liberty Street EDPL Determination and Findings
    DETERMINATION AND FINDINGS BY THE LOWER MANHATTAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PURSUANT TO EDPL SECTION 204 WITH RESPECT TO THE 130 LIBERTY STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER MEMORIAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAM LAND USE IMPROVEMENT AND CIVIC PROJECT The real property known as 130 Liberty Street in Manhattan is to be Street. For over a year, the Deutsche Bank building has been shroud- acquired as part of the proposed World Trade Center Memorial and ed in dark netting which casts a foreboding specter over the WTC Site Cultural Program Land Use Improvement and Civic Project (the and adjoining community of Lower Manhattan. As such, it serves as “Project”) which includes the acquisition, cleanup and deconstruction a constant and vivid reminder of the tragic events of September 11, of a 41-story office building sometimes known as the Deutsche Bank 2001 and thereby hampers the economic redevelopment and revital- building. That building was substantially damaged and became con- ization of the WTC Site and the surrounding community and the cre- taminated as a result of the World Trade Center (“WTC”) terrorist ation of an appropriate Memorial for the victims of the September attacks on September 11, 2001 and requires cleanup. The 130 11th terrorists attacks. Liberty Street parcel consists of an entire city block bounded by Washington, Liberty, Greenwich and Albany Streets in Lower Before deconstruction proceeds, the Deutsche Bank building at 130 Manhattan. It is located immediately south of the current southerly Liberty Street would be decontaminated so as to avoid the release of boundary of the WTC Site. The Project is being coordinated among the possible contaminants into the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Introduction
    1.Introduction The original idea for a world trade center in New York is generally credited to David Rockefeller, one of industrialist John D. Rockefeller's many grandsons. In fact, the idea was proposed soon after World War II, a decade before Rockefeller ever got involved, but he was the one who actually got the ball rolling. In the 1950s and '60s, while serving as chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, Rockefeller was dedicated to revitalizing lower Manhattan. He hoped to energize the area with new construction, in much the same way his father revitalized midtown Manhattan in the 1930s with Rockefeller Center. As part of his plan, David Rockefeller proposed a complex dedicated to international trade, to be constructed at the east end of Wall Street. Rockefeller believed that the trade center, which would include office and hotel space, an exhibit hall, a securities and exchange center and numerous shops, would be just the thing to spur economic growth in the area. The original World Trade Center featured landmark twin towers(1 WTC and 2 WTC), which opened on April 4, 1973. The North Tower (left), with antenna spire, is 1 WTC. The South Tower (right) is 2 WTC 33 2.Contruction of the World Trade Center The construction of the World Trade Center was conceived as an urban renewal project, spearheaded by David Rockefeller, to help revitalize Lower Manhattan. On September 20, 1962, the Port Authority announced the selection of Minoru Yamasaki as lead architect, and Emery Roth & Sons as associate architects. Originally, Yamasaki submitted to the Port Authority a concept incorporating twin towers, but with each building only 80 stories tall.
    [Show full text]