DOCSLIB.ORG

The National Election of 1912 in Nebraska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The National Election of 1912 in Nebraska University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 5-1-1940 The national election of 1912 in Nebraska C L. Hartman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Hartman, C L., "The national election of 1912 in Nebraska" (1940). Student Work. 482. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/482 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NATIONAL ELECTION OF 1912 IN NEBRASKA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of History and Government Municipal University of Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By C. L. Hartman May, 1940 UMI Number: EP73120 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73120 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chanter I~. INTRODUCTION.............................. 1 II. THE PRIMARIES ................................ 6 Progressive Sentiment Party Organization Political Issues III. THE NATIONAL CONVENTIONS................ 27 Republican Democratic Progressive IV. CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION .......................... 59 Republican Party Schism State Party Conventions Nebraska Supreme Court Rulings Campaign Leaders Election Results V. CONCLUSION ..... ........ 89 VI. APPENDIX .................................. 96 A. Congressional Districts in Nebraska 1912 96 B. Court Decisions, Nebraska Supreme Court. 98 1. Morrissey vs. W a i t ................ 98 2. State vs. W a i t ................ 100 C. Delegatee to National party Conventions and their Votes ................... 102 1. Democratic........................ 102 2. Republican ....... 107 0. Progressive.................... 110 D. Election Returns, Primary, April 19, 1912 112 1. Democratic.................... 112 2. Peonies Independent............ 114 li. 3. prohibition .................... 115 4. Republican. 116 5. Socialist............................ 119 E. Election Returns, November 5, 1912. 121 F. Morgan, Ryan, Belmont Resolution......... 125 A Story by Harry N. Waller ............. 125 0. Platforms Nebraska Parties, 1912. .... 130 1. Democratic........................... 130 2. Popul i st............................. 134 3. Progressive Medical "Bull Moosers" Convention, ."u .j 31, 1912 ...... 135 4. Progressive P: uical "Bull Moosers" Convention, September 3, 1912 .... 139 5. Prohibition................... .. 142 6. Republican "Bolters". ........ 143 ?. Republican "Bull Moose" Branch. 144 8. Socialist........................... 147 H. presidential Poll, Nebraska.. ............ 149 1. Primary Law, Nebraska, 1905, 1907, 1911 Excerpts ........... ..... 150 1. Referring to National Convention Delegates.............. 150 2. Referring to Morrissey vs. Wait Supreme Court Decision............... 151 3. Referring to State vs. 'bait Supreme Court Decision............... 152 J. Ross, R. G. Letter, Filing for Presi­ dential Candidate....................... 154 K. State Centre,! Committees. ........ 155 1. Democratic ................ 155 2. Populist ..... 156 3. Prohibition.......................... 156 4. Republican "Bolters"................. 156 5. Republican "Bull Moose" Branch. , 157 6. Republican 1908-1912, Before the Republican Division, 1912 ...... 158 L. State Party Executive Committees. .... 159 1. Progressive Radical "Bull Moosers" Convention, July 31, 1912...... 159 2. Progressive Radical "Bull Moosers" Convention, September 3, 1912 .... 15S M. Illustrations and M a p s ................... 160 1. County Distribution of Party Vote, 1896-1920 ............................ 150 iii 2* County Vote, primaries 1912 and 1914 . 161 3. Distribution*of Party Vote, 1900-1920 . 165 4. Congressional Districts, 1912, Map . 166 5. County Vote, 1908, Map ........ 167 6. County Vote, 1912, Map !.!....! 168 7. County Vote, 1916, Map ........ 169 VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................... 170 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Before 1912, "the Nebraska delegates to the national party conventions were chosen by state conventions, dominated 1 by the local bosses. The presidential preference primary law now effective for the first time, provided for popular choice of delegates, and left the politicians guessing, as to the character of those delegations. There were indications in October, 1911, that the Nebraska republicans favored William Howard Taft and Robert M. La Follette. The democratic situa­ tion was far more complex. The followers of William Jennings Bryan were divided about equally between Woodrow Wilson and Champ Clark, while Bryan was friendly to both. Democratic organization leaders, particularly in Omaha, were antagonis­ tic to Bryan, and favored the nominaition of Governor Judson Harmon of Ohio.'" Bryan, three times the democratic candidate for president, declared in an address at Kansas City early in October, 1911, that he was not a candidate for the president of the United States.° Bryan’s general purpose ^Appendix I, p. 150 2 Angus McSween, “Outside Looks in Nebraska Politics,11 reprinted by The Lincoln Daily Star, October 13, 1911, from Philadelphia North American (ca. 0ctober 10, 1911). 5The Lincoln Daily Star, October 3, 1911. 1 was to advocate progressive policies designed to bring about the nomination of a progressive candidate.4 The split in the democratic party of Nebraska was evident in Bryan's speech at Norfolk in March, 1912. Here the great orator made the following statement concerning Nebraska's democratic senator, Gilbert M. Hitchcock: I found fifteen years ago he was fighting me. I have worked for twenty years to make a democrat out of the World Herald editor, only to find him to be a backslider.n Hitchcock's support of the wet group at the democrat­ ic state convention at Grand Island in 1910 had defeated Bryan, and now the two leaders were battling; for control of the state organization. Omaha was the headquarters for the wet group, and Hitchcock, with his World Herald, the center rj of influence.0 Lack of unity among the Nebraska, republicans was revealed by the pre-convention statements of their leaders, that there was no chance of Taft's re-election, even if he 7 were nominated, and they stated he v/ouid not carry Nebraska. The cold reception Taft had received on his trip to Nebraska in the fall of 1911 showed plainly that the state was not 4MeSween, op. cit. ^Morning torId Herald, Omaha, Maron 28, 1912. UA. M. Sheldon, Nebraska, The Land and the People, (Chicago, New York: The Lewis publishing Comoany, 1951) , Vol. I, p. 872. 7The Lincoln Daily Star, December 19, 1911. 5 in sympathy with his record.8 In May, 1911, the Nebraska progressive republican league instructed Franklin A. Shotv;ell of Omaha, the league secretary, to write Colonel Roosevelt, asking his permission to start a movement to bring about his nomination for a third term. Roosevelt answered Shotwell in a straight-forward manner: 11 Any such movement, as that you suggest, would very deeply embarrass me, and I must insist that you, and any other friends I have, shall do all in their 9 power to prevent any such movement.” On December 21, 1911, secretary of state Addison Wait received a petition from Omaha proposing Theodore Roosevelt as the republican presidential candidate. The list of signers was headed by John 0. Yeiser, a political lieutenant^ of Victor Rosewater, republican national committeeman from Nebraska. Rosewater, who was editor of the Omaha Bee, was in V/ashington at the time. He issued the statement that Yeiser was formerly a populist, and that Nebraska was a "sure enough Taft state.” He added that the regular republicans 11 had carried the state by 10,000 in the November election. Nebraska1s republican governor, Chester H. Aldrich, declared himself for La Follette, October 2, 1911, in a letter to Ross Hammond, internal collector of revenue at o Morning World Herald, Editorial, October 5, 1911. -The Omaha Daily Bee, Morning, March 5, 1912. ~^The Lincoln Daily Star, December 21, 1911. 11Morning World Herald, December 23, 1911. 4 Fremont, Nebraska; MI am for Senator La Follette for president of the United States, and I donft care who knows *1 o |j L jO A Roosevelt national committee was seL up in Chicago, January 51, 1912. After a visit to Roosevelt, the committee president, Alexander H. Revell, called a meeting for February 10, at Chicago. Aldrich was one of the eight governors to attend this meeting. A resolution was adopted, calling on 15 Roosevelt to run for president. George W. Norris of MeCook, republican congressman from the fifth Nebraska district, displayed his progressive­ ness in leading the insurgent republicans and democrats in the national house to a victory over ,,Cannonismu in March, 1910. Norris was vice-president of the national republican 14 progressive league. The sudden physical breakdown
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amos Pinchot and Atomistic Capitalism: a Study in Reform Ideas
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1973 Amos Pinchot and Atomistic Capitalism: a Study in Reform Ideas. Rex Oliver Mooney Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Mooney, Rex Oliver, "Amos Pinchot and Atomistic Capitalism: a Study in Reform Ideas." (1973). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2484. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2484 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner
    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Dennison, the Omaha Bee, and the 1919 Omaha Race Riot
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Tom Dennison, The Omaha Bee, and the 1919 Omaha Race Riot Full Citation: Orville D Menard, “Tom Dennison, The Omaha Bee, and the 1919 Omaha Race Riot,” Nebraska History 68 (1987): 152-165. URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/1987-4-Dennison_Riot.pdf Date: 2/10/2010 Article Summary: In the spring of 1921 Omahans returned James Dahlman to the mayor’s office, replacing Edward P Smith. One particular event convinced Omaha voters that Smith and his divided commissioners must go in order to recapture the stability enjoyed under political boss Tom “the Old Man” Dennison and the Dahlman administration. The role of Dennison and his men in the riot of September 26, 1919, remains equivocal so far as Will Brown’s arrest and murder. However, Dennison and the Bee helped create conditions ripe for the outbreak of racial violence. Errata (if any) Cataloging
    [Show full text]
  • The 2004 Election a Matter of Faith? 1 David E
    10397-01_Ch01.qxd 3/26/07 10:41 AM Page 1 The 2004 Election A Matter of Faith? 1 David E. Campbell ew observers of American politics deny that in recent Fyears religion has come to play an increasingly important role in the nation’s elections, especially the presidential election. To some, per- haps many, religion may appear to be a new factor in national politics. But today’s focus on religion is really just a variation on what has been a common theme throughout U.S. history. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson had to deal with accusations that he was an atheist; in the late 1800s, William Jennings Bryan invoked biblical themes to support economic policy; in 1928, Al Smith faced anti-Catholic mobs on the campaign trail; in 1960, John F. Kennedy too had to forestall anti-Catholic sentiment that, while muted when compared with what Smith faced in 1928, lingered nonetheless. Religion, then, has long been a feature in national elections. Yet that does not mean that the religious cleavages of the past correspond to those of the pres- ent. Rather, the last thirty years have seen a re-sorting of the parties’ electoral coalitions along religious lines. No longer are Democrats and Republicans divided along the old lines, defined by whether they are Catholic or Protestant. Instead of religious denomination, the parties are divided by religious devo- tional style—that is, a way of being religious. People who are more devout— regardless of denomination—are more likely to favor the GOP. Obviously, such a statement is a generalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Magazine of History
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY - VOLUMEXXXI MARCH, 1935 NUMBER1 The Nomination of the Democratic Candidate in 1924 By SEXSONE. HUMPHREYS One of the strangest among the phenomena of American party history is the Democratic National Convention of 1924, in which all the elements that tend to divide the Democratic party combined to produce a bitterness such as had never been seen in a political convention before and to send the number of ballots required to name a candidate to the record figure of 103. Historians are familiar with the problems that caused the impasse and have frequently analyzed their significance. Students of politics find in the convention a demonstration of how diverse are the interests represented in the Democratic party. There is one question regarding the convention, how- ever, that has largely gone unanswered, and frequently un- asked. That is the question of how it happened that John W. Davis became the nominee of the party. This is an impor- tant question, for it represents the first time since 1860 that the party had gone south of the Mason-Dixon line for its candidate, unless Woodrow Wilson, born in Virginia, but nominated from New Jersey, be considered an exception. The nomination indicates also the triumph of the metropolitan element in the party that was to lead it to defeat in 1928. John W. Davis was the second choice, not of the forces which had kept William G. McAdoo in the lead during most of the convention, but of the forces of A1 Smith-the urban, Catholic, and financial interests in the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Inauguration of John Grier Hibben
    INAUGURATION O F J O H N G R I E R H I B B E N PRESIDENT OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AT RDAY MAY S U , THE ELEVENTH MCMXII INAUGURATION O F J O H N G R I E R H I B B E N PRESIDENT OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY SATUR AY MAY THE ELE ENTH D , V MCMXII PROGRAMME AN D ORDER OF ACADEMI C PROCESSION INAUGURAL EXERCISES at eleven o ’ clock March from Athalia Mendelssohn Veni Creator Spiritus Palestrina SC RI PTUR E AN D P RAYE R HENRY. VAN DYKE Murray Professor of English Literature ADM I N I STRATI ON O F T H E OATH O F OFF I CE MAHLON PITNEY Associat e Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States D ELIVE RY O F T H E CHARTE R AN D KEYS JOHN AIKMAN STEWART e E " - n S nior Trustee, President pro tempore of Pri ceton University I NAUGURAL ADD RE SS JOHN GRIER HIBBEN President of Princeton University CONFE RR ING O F HONORARY D EGREES O Il EDWARD D OUGLASS W H I T E T h e Chief Justice of the United States WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT President of the United States T H E O N E HUND REDTH P SALM Sung in unison by choir and assembly standing Accompaniment of trumpets BENED I CT I ON EDWIN STEVENS LINES Bishop of Newark Postlude Svendsen (The audience ls re"uested to stand while the academic "rocession ls enterlng and "assing out) ALUMNI LUNCHEON T h e Gymnasium ’ at "uarter before one O clock ’ M .
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing Onel Roosevelt Would Be on Hand Be- 1904 and 1906 Will Be Made Until After the Fore the Convention Preliminaries Were Baltimore
    IT LOOKS AS THOUGH POOR DOC YAK WILL NEVER SEE HIS FORTU \E : : : : : By Sidney Smith [Copyright: 1D12: By Frank Hammer.] OiD DOC YA K’S [© M ORDINARY PERSON WHO HAS NEVER ww'AT FROM A Fiurf NAD A MILLION FIUNGS HELD (5LASA DOUARS, LfPT HIN\ REVEAAEO OLD DOC YAK'J> nervous, ness may SEEM A BIT EXAGGERATED BUY STOP Ano think OKA* READER WIVAT THIS MEANS- PUT YOURSELF IN HIS PLACE would You UiT idly qy witn This vast Sum IN Slt,HY .CARING NOT DFAf? DOCTOft- A WHIT? ONE MILLION &EANS* I we WOULD strike _ AfA A YOUN6 WOMAN. v ^ WHAT SAW 17 rt-ARS o^Aae. NO WONDER CaP/OUS / <u TERROR TO TN£ HEART OP AM ?AD POP WNE&lE* TNE BRANE ENGINEER m>( voice- nas suddenly Drops op pers pi rat/on Fickle THE ordinary en^inee^r 3UY WAS SEATED AT THE HIS TELfXCOPlC. E'V'f PEER/NO THROUGH CHANfc&p FROVi A BEAUTIFUl- down THROTTIF, old doc's pur rowed MKE ATMOSPHERE WHEN SUDDENLY SHARP CRACK NOT SO WITH OLD POP, SORRANO TO A R1C.H OEEPJJASS WAZT.SwANNP ,TH£ A Hl$ BROW. YOU CAN T BLAME HE WERELH STRUCK /rtATCH,<?£IT I OF A TQ/RPEDO RANE Our /H THE CRISP NICrHT A/R — The -SiCfHAL TO WHAT SWAAL & O FOR IT3 HIM POR. A Teeth a wd whis pered to the pieman. WAVING, FEVER. — STOP*,- QUICK! FREMH& TUB- FIELD GLASS THERE IZDANCzER AHEAD AN\wes— « ROBBE-RS AME-AD" Op //a / N the shade- $lt>N^r£MI'T>£3 TRMN GtrAOOB M A A\Aifquart?)??.
    [Show full text]
  • The Many and the One: Religion and Pluralism in American History Peter Lewek Montini Catholic High School Project: Selected Prim
    THE MANY AND THE ONE: RELIGION AND PLURALISM IN AMERICAN HISTORY PETER LEWEK MONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT: SELECTED PRIMARY SOURCE READINGS IN THE 20TH CENTURY This listing includes some examples of the interaction of religion and American society and culture in the 20th century. This listing is incomplete and also is not a balanced set of readings. 1900-1920 Jane Addams – 20 Years at Hull House (1910) Chapter 4 (pp.120-126) – Christian Humanitarianism Chapter 6 – the necessity of settlement houses and the motives of its workers Walter Rauschenbusch – Christianity and the Social Crisis (1913) Excerpts from Chapter 7 – “What to do- Social Evangelization and the Pulpit and the Social Question” Woodrow Wilson – 1912 Campaign Speech –“America was born a Christian nation” Chicago New World - editorials and news articles on the loyalty and Americanism of Chicago Catholic immigrants and their families (1915-1920) 1920-1940 The Scopes Trial 1) William Jennings Bryan – “Who Shall Control our Schools?” June, 1925 2) W.E.B. DuBois – “Scopes” – Crisis, September, 1925 3) Clarence Darrow –Autobiography, pp.244-255 – Chapter 29 – “The Evolution Case” Bruce Barton - The Man Nobody Knows (1925) – “Jesus as a Business Executive” Presidential Election of 1928: Alfred E. Smith – Campaign Addresses (1929) Herbert Hoover - Memoirs Father Charles Coughlin: Radio Speech for the National Union for Social Justice, November 11, 1934 Radio Speech – “President Roosevelt and Social Justice” Jan. 9, 1934 Detroit News excerpts and quotes of Father Charles Coughlin (1934-1943) Frances Perkins and Episcopalians 1940-1960 Dorothy Day – The Catholic Worker, June, 1942 - “Love is the Measure” Harry S.
    [Show full text]
  • To Resolutions
    Index to Resolutions PAGE. PAGE. RESOLUTION NO. 1-MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 13 - MR. MARRIOTT. Relative to election of a president of the Convention. adjournment. Offered . 26 Offered . 58 Adopted . 26 Adopted . 58 RESOLUTION NO. 2 - MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 14 - MR. ELSON. Relative to the election of a secretary of the Convention. purchasing of supplies for the Convention. Offered . 33 ,Offered ,. 82 Adopted . 33 Adopted . ~2 RESOLUTION NO. 15 - MR. ANTRIM. Relative to RESOLUTION NO~3- MR. WATSON. Relative to the the distribution of the journals of the Convention. election of a sergeant-at-arms of the Convention. Offered 82 Offered . 34 Remarks on 85-87 Adopted . 34 Referred to select committee.. ........... .. ...... 87 RESOLUTION NO. 4 - MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 16 - MR. READ. Relative to mile­ printing and distribution of the daily journals of age of the delegates. the Convention. • ,Offered . 82 Offered . 37 Adopted . 87 Adopted . 37 RESOLUTION NO. 17 - MR. STOKES. Inviting Gov­ RESOLUTION NO. 5 -- MR. DOTY. Relative to the ernor Judson Harmon to address the Convention. selection of seats. Offered . 83 Offered . 37 Adapted . 83 Adopted ' . 37 RESOLUTION NO. 18 - MR. EVANS. Relative to as- I certaining the names of surviving delegates to the RESOLUTION NO.6 - MR. HOSKINS. Relative to the Constitutional Convention of 1873. appointment of a permanent committee on Rules. Offered . 83 Offered 38 l\dopted . 92 Debated 38-51 Adopted ,.. 51 RESOLUTION NO. 19 - MR. KERR. Inviting President William H. Taft to address the Convention. RESOLUTION NO.7 - MR. ROEHM. Relative to the Offered .
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of George Perkins and Frank Munsey in the Progressive
    “A Progressive Conservative”: The Roles of George Perkins and Frank Munsey in the Progressive Party Campaign of 1912 A thesis submitted by Marena Cole in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Tufts University May 2017 Adviser: Reed Ueda Abstract The election of 1912 was a contest between four parties. Among them was the Progressive Party, a movement begun by former president Theodore Roosevelt. George Perkins and Frank Munsey, two wealthy businessmen with interests in business policy and reform, provided the bulk of the Progressive Party’s funding and proved crucial to its operations. This stirred up considerable controversy, particularly amongst the party’s radical wing. One Progressive, Amos Pinchot, would later say that the two corrupted and destroyed the movement. While Pinchot’s charge is too severe, particularly given the support Perkins and Munsey had from Roosevelt, the two did push the Progressive Party to adopt a softer program on antitrust regulation and enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Progressive Party’s official position on antitrust and the Sherman Act, as shaped by Munsey and Perkins, would cause internal ideological schisms within the party that would ultimately contribute to the party’s dissolution. ii Acknowledgements This thesis finalizes my time at the Tufts University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, which has been a tremendously challenging and fulfilling place to study. I would first like to thank those faculty at Boston College who helped me find my way to Tufts. I have tremendous gratitude to Lori Harrison-Kahan, who patiently guided me through my first experiences with archival research.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Sen
    . .,.. - ---- ... ----- 1928 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE 711 Joy Street, Boston, Mass., recommending passage of the Newton the Senate, the unveiling of the Wright Brothers Monument bill, which provides for the creation of a child welfare exten­ at Kitty Hawk, N. C. sion service in the Children's Bureau ; to the Committee on The VICE PRESIDENT. Eighty-one Senators having an­ Education. swered to their names, a quorum is present. 8011. By Mr. YATES : Petition· of Le Seure Bros., jobbers and MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSFi-ENROLLED BILL SIGNED retailers of cigars and tobaccos, Danville, Ohio, protesting Senate bill 2751; to the Committee on Ways and Means. A message from the House of Representatives, by Mr. Halti­ 8012. Also, petition of H. M. Voorhis, of the law offices of gan, one of its clerks, announced that the Speaker had affixed to R. Maguire & Voorhis, of Orlando, Fla., urging passage of the his signature the enrolled bill (H. 13990) to authorize the Sears bill (H. R. 10Z70) ; to the Committee on the Judiciary. President to present the distinguished flying cross to Orville Wright, and to Wilbur Wright, deceased, and it was signed by 8013. Also, petition of W. T. Alden, of the law offices of Alden, the Vice President. Latham & Young, Chicago, Ill., urging passage of Senate bill 3623, amending section 204 of the transportation act of 1920 ; PETITIONS AND MEMOKIALS to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. The VICE PRESIDENT laid before the Senate a petition of 8014. Also, petition of the legislative committee of the Rail­ sundry citizens of St. Petersburg, Fla., praying for the prompt way Mail Association, Illinois Branch, Chicago, urging passage ratification of the so-called Kellogg multilateral treaty for the of the following bills: The retirement bill (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural History
    INAUGURAL HISTORY Here is some inaugural trivia, followed by a short description of each inauguration since George Washington. Ceremony o First outdoor ceremony: George Washington, 1789, balcony, Federal Hall, New York City. George Washington is the only U.S. President to have been inaugurated in two different cities, New York City in April 1789, and his second took place in Philadelphia in March 1793. o First president to take oath on January 20th: Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1937, his second inaugural. o Presidents who used two Bibles at their inauguration: Harry Truman, 1949, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953, George Bush, 1989. o Someone forgot the Bible for FDR's first inauguration in 1933. A policeman offered his. o 36 of the 53 U.S. Inaugurations were held on the East Portico of the Capitol. In 1981, Ronald Reagan was the first to hold an inauguration on the West Front. Platform o First platform constructed for an inauguration: Martin Van Buren, 1837 [note: James Monroe, 1817, was inaugurated in a temporary portico outside Congress Hall because the Capitol had been burned down by the British in the War of 1812]. o First canopied platform: Abraham Lincoln, 1861. Broadcasting o First ceremony to be reported by telegraph: James Polk, 1845. o First ceremony to be photographed: James Buchanan, 1857. o First motion picture of ceremony: William McKinley, 1897. o First electronically-amplified speech: Warren Harding, 1921. o First radio broadcast: Calvin Coolidge, 1925. o First recorded on talking newsreel: Herbert Hoover, 1929. o First television coverage: Harry Truman, 1949. [Only 172,000 households had television sets.] o First live Internet broadcast: Bill Clinton, 1997.
    [Show full text]