DOCSLIB.ORG

Synopsis of American Political Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Synopsis of American Political Parties FEDERALISTS DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICANS Favored strong central gov't emphasized states' rights Social order & stability important Stressed civil liberties & public trust "True patriots vs. the subversive rabble" "Rule of all people vs. the favored few" "Loose" constructionists "Strict" constructionists Promoted business & manufacturing Encouraged agrarian society Favored close ties with Britain Admired the French Strongest in Northeast Supported in South & West Gazette of the United States (John Fenno) National Gazette (Philip Freneau) Directed by Hamilton (+ Washington) Founded by Jefferson (+ Madison) First Two-Party System: 1780s-1801 During most of George Washington's presidency, no real two-party political system existed. The Constitution made no provision whatever for political parties. While its framers recognized that reasonable disagreement and organized debate were healthy components in a democratic society, creation of permanent factions was an extreme to be avoided. (The consensus among the founding fathers was that political parties were potentially dangerous because they divided society, became dominated by narrow special interests, and placed mere party loyalty above concern for the common welfare.) Hence, to identify Washington with the Federalist Party is an ex post facto distinction. Accordingly, Washington's first "election" is more accurately described as a "placement"; his second election was procedural only. The first presidential challenge whereby the citizenry genuinely expressed choice between candidates affiliated with two separate parties occurred in 1896, when John Adams won the honor of following in Washington's footsteps. The cartoon above shows the infamous brawl in House of Representatives between Democratic-Republican Matthew Lyon of Vermont and Federalist Roger Griswold from Connecticut. Lyon responded to a verbal insult from Griswold by spitting in Griswold's eye. Still seething two weeks later, Griswold used his cane to pummel Lyon, whereupon Lyon retaliated with some fire tongs. Before long, the two were grappling on the floor. All this occurs to the apparent delight of their legislative colleagues, who appear to enjoy the impromptu brouhaha. Another congressman lamented that the incident had reduced Congress to "an assembly of gladiators." Soon afterward, poor Lyon became the first person convicted by the Federalists of violating the Sedition Act of 1798. His crime? The lawmaker accused President John Adams of having "a continual grasp for power—an unbounded thirst for ridiculous pomp, foolish adulation, and selfish avarice." Election of 1824: The "Corrupt Bargain" JOHN QUINCY ADAMS HENRY CLAY Sec. of State under Monroe Speaker of the House Chief support was in New England Primary support was in the West House vote: Adams 13, Jackson 7, Crawford 4 Exercised strong leverage for Adams Presidency marred otherwise superb career Rec'd Sec. of State appointment WILLIAM CRAWFORD ANDREW JACKSON Sec. of Treasury under Monroe War hero (re: Battle of New Orleans) Major support was in the South Broad nat'l support Backed by living "Virginia Dynasty" Tops in popular & electoral votes Stroke severely hampered campaign Charged Adams & Clay w/ "corrupt bargain" The Democratic-Republicans faced no serious opposition in the presidential election of 1824, but the party could not unite under a single candidate. The result was a general election deadlock which forced the decision into the House of Representatives, where John Quincy Adams was elected on the first ballot over Andrew Jackson, who had garnered the most popular votes (presumably, electoral votes as well) in the general election. There was some apparent deal-making prior to the House vote. Henry Clay, finishing fourth in the popular election and therefore eliminated from further consideration, urged his House supporters to back Adams. When Adams became President, he appointed Clay as Secretary of State, considered then, every bit as much as the position of Vice-President, to be the stepping-stone to the White House. Hence, Jackson and his supporters bitterly protested the affair as a "corrupt bargain." While there may be some small degree of validity to a political deal (that it was somehow corrupt is baseless), often ignored is the fact that in 1824 the popular vote was not an altogether accurate indicator of the people's will because very few states had all four candidates on the November ballot (several states had only two). Additionally, six states chose electors through their state legislatures rather than general election. Unfortunately for Adams, he was out of his realm as President. Historically, his mediocre presidential term overshadows an otherwise stellar political career of service to the United States, especially in foreign affairs. As for Clay, he never did make it to the White House. Jeffersonian Democracy vs. Jacksonian Democracy JEFFERSONIANS JACKSONIANS Outlined modern Democratic Party Completed modern Democratic Party Founded the party Gave the party true organization & Gov't by the people eventually direction Formal education req'd to vote Gov't by the people immediately responsibly Good voting req'd common sense only Main interest was farmers Also city workers & small businessmen Somewhat open-minded & non-partisan Less tolerant, esp. of political enemies Deferred to gov't processes for "right" Spokesman for the "common man" action Jackson (#7), Van Buren (#8), Polk (#11) Jefferson, Madison, Monroe (all 2 terms) The Democratic-Republican Party arose in response to what many Americans viewed as a Federalist Party becoming increasingly neglectful of public interest. While members of the new party called themselves "Republicans," they are not related to the modern Republican Party but instead are considered by many historians the rudiment of today's Democratic Party. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison provided strong early leadership for the Democratic-Republicans. In the so-called "Revolution of 1800," the electorate ousted the distant, monarchical-acting Federalists in favor of comfortable, old-fashioned democratic principles championed by the Democratic-Republicans. When Andrew Jackson was elected to the White House in 1828, he thrust America into a democratic experience even more grass-roots than that of the Jeffersonians before him. Some historians are reluctant to trace the modern Democratic Party all the way back to Thomas Jefferson, preferring instead to credit Jackson as the present-day party's ancestral standard-bearer. Perhaps a suitable historical image of the Democratic Party would be a circle outlined by Jefferson, plenished by Jackson. Ironically, Jefferson did not care for Jackson's brash form of democracy, once calling Jackson a politically "dangerous man"; the puritanical John Quincy Adams (Jackson's predecessor and major opponent in the presidential elections of 1824 and 1828) referred to him as a "barbarian." Second Two-Party System: 1836-1850s DEMOCRATS WHIGS Party of tradition Party of modernization Looked backward (focused on the past) Looked forward (focused on the future) Addressed Americans' fears Appealed to Americans' hopes Opposed banks & corporations Favored banks & transportation Opposed gov't-funded reform Advocated wide social reform Jeffersonian agrarians; favored slavery Business-minded entrepreneurs Rapid territorial expansion by any process Gradual territorial expansion w/o war Progress thru external growth Progress thru internal growth Supported in South & West Supported in North Jackson & Polk Calhoun, Clay, Webster The several diverse factions which fused to create the Whig Party actually had little ideology in common, though the coalition possessed great resources of wealth and talent. Political giants John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster all identified with the Whig Party at some point in their distinguished tenures. Additionally, John Quincy Adams switched to the Whigs after his presidency; Abraham Lincoln began his political career as a Whig. The chief immediate obstacle ahead for the Whigs was to somehow overcome the public perception that since the party staunchly opposed Jackson, it therefore stood in conflict with the major trend of the age—glorification of the common man. The Whigs managed to overcome this ideological bump in the road by portraying themselves as the party of economic prosperity, moral respectability, and social-welfare measures. Beginning with William Henry Harrison in 1840, four of five Presidents represented the Whig Party (James K. Polk, an ardent Jacksonian, interrupted the string of White House Whigs) before the party dissolved in the 1850s. The Whig Party arose in challenge to "King Andrew" Jackson. Ironically, it was Jackson himself who opened the door for the new party to form because his presidency was so domineering that it effectively eradicated America's true two-party system. An attempt on Jackson's life in 1835 was incorrectly blamed on the Whigs. Political Upheaval of the Mid-1800s LIBERTY PARTY WHIG PARTY Abolitionist Four of five Presidents between 1841 & 1853 Birney in 1840 & 1844 Northern "Conscience" Whigs Southern "Cotton" Whigs FREE SOIL PARTY Gradually drifted toward other parties Not abolitionist, but opposed slavery expansion AMERICAN PARTY Van Buren in 1848 & Hale in 1852 Popularly referred to as "Know Nothing" Party Opposed immigration; supported temperance Fillmore in 1856 won 8 electoral votes Absorbed
Recommended publications
  • Edmund S. Muskie Papers Tape No. Description

    Edmund S. Muskie Papers Tape No. Description

    Edmund S. Muskie Papers Page 1 of 139 Container List for Series XVII.A Sound Recordings: Cassette Tapes Tape No. Description SC1 [Remarks at reception] Length: 10 min. 21 sec. Location: Saint Louis, Missouri. Date: September 10, 1968. Content: ESM remarks at mayor's home on 1968 election campaign. Audio quality: good. SC2 [Speech] Length: 42 min. 3 sec. Date: December 1968. Content: ESM on nemployment and labor concerns, inflation, cost of living, "working people in Me." Audio quality: good. SC3 [Speech] Length: 28 min. 57 sec. Date: January 30, 1969 Content: ESM on “Consumer Assembly." Audio quality: excellent. SC4 [Speech] Length: 24 min. 21 sec. Date: February 19, 1969. Content: ESM speaks before women's group on federal spending, priorities, anti-ballistic missiles, education, school lunch. Audio quality: good. SC5 [Press conference] Length: 5 min. 2 sec. Date: February 19, 1969. Content: Part of ESM press conference with Japanese officials, United States-Pacific Rim relations, arms race, anti-ballistic missile development, U.S-Soviet relations, pollution. Audio quality: good. SC6 [Question and answer session] Length: 58 min. 53 sec. Location: Cleveland Park, Ohio. Date: April 15, 1969. Content: ESM on urban problems with question and answer session, antiballistic missiles. Audio quality: excellent. SC7 [Speech] Length: 8 min. 58 sec. Location: Cleveland High School, Cleveland, Ohio. Date: 1969. Content: ESM on education. Audio quality: poor. SC8 [Interview with Ted Lippman] Length: 35 min. 58 sec. Date: April 24, 1970. Content: ESM on 1972 campaign plans, activities since 1968 election. Audio quality: poor. SC9 [Press conference] Length: 9 min. 59 sec.
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner

    William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner

    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
  • Corrupt Bargain" Charge Against Clay and Adams

    Corrupt Bargain" Charge Against Clay and Adams

    THE "CORRUPT BARGAIN" CHARGE AGAINST CLAY AND ADAMS: AN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS BY WILLIAM G. MORGAN Oral Roberts University Tulsa, Oklahoma The election of 1824 provided a substantial portion of the ground- work for the notable political changes which emerged from the some- what misnamed "Era of Good Feelings," while at the same time involv- ing several unusual political phenomena. A cardinal feature of this electoral struggle was the large number of prominent candidates. Early in the contest the serious contenders totaled as many as "16 or 17," in- cluding William H. Crawford, Secretary of the Treasury; John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State; Henry Clay, long-time Speaker of the House; John C. Calhoun, Secretary of War; Smith Thompson, Secretary of the Navy; Vice-President Daniel D. Tompkins; Governor DeWitt Clinton of New York; Representative William Lowndes of South Carolina; and a comparative latecomer to politics, General Andrew Jackson] As the campaign progressed, several of these men dropped from conten- tion: Lowndes died in 1822, while Thompson, Tompkins, and Clinton fell from the ranks for lack of support, though there was mention of the latter's possible candidacy late in 1823.2 Calhoun subsequently withdrew from the race, deciding to delay his bid for the presidency to accept the second office.8 Of the prominent contenders remaining in the contest, Crawford was the administration favorite, and his position as Treasury Secretary had enabled him to build a significant following in various circles.4 Despite these advantages, Crawford's success proved illusory: among other difficulties, the Georgian suffered a severe stroke in the summer of 1823 and was the victim of the growing antagonism toward the caucus, the very insti- nation on which he was relying to bring him broad party support.5 Adams, Clay, and Jackson fought actively to secure an electoral majority or, failing that, to gain sufficient votes to be included in the top three who would be presented to the House of Representatives for the final decision.
  • The 2004 Election a Matter of Faith? 1 David E

    The 2004 Election a Matter of Faith? 1 David E

    10397-01_Ch01.qxd 3/26/07 10:41 AM Page 1 The 2004 Election A Matter of Faith? 1 David E. Campbell ew observers of American politics deny that in recent Fyears religion has come to play an increasingly important role in the nation’s elections, especially the presidential election. To some, per- haps many, religion may appear to be a new factor in national politics. But today’s focus on religion is really just a variation on what has been a common theme throughout U.S. history. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson had to deal with accusations that he was an atheist; in the late 1800s, William Jennings Bryan invoked biblical themes to support economic policy; in 1928, Al Smith faced anti-Catholic mobs on the campaign trail; in 1960, John F. Kennedy too had to forestall anti-Catholic sentiment that, while muted when compared with what Smith faced in 1928, lingered nonetheless. Religion, then, has long been a feature in national elections. Yet that does not mean that the religious cleavages of the past correspond to those of the pres- ent. Rather, the last thirty years have seen a re-sorting of the parties’ electoral coalitions along religious lines. No longer are Democrats and Republicans divided along the old lines, defined by whether they are Catholic or Protestant. Instead of religious denomination, the parties are divided by religious devo- tional style—that is, a way of being religious. People who are more devout— regardless of denomination—are more likely to favor the GOP. Obviously, such a statement is a generalization.
  • Indiana Magazine of History

    Indiana Magazine of History

    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY - VOLUMEXXXI MARCH, 1935 NUMBER1 The Nomination of the Democratic Candidate in 1924 By SEXSONE. HUMPHREYS One of the strangest among the phenomena of American party history is the Democratic National Convention of 1924, in which all the elements that tend to divide the Democratic party combined to produce a bitterness such as had never been seen in a political convention before and to send the number of ballots required to name a candidate to the record figure of 103. Historians are familiar with the problems that caused the impasse and have frequently analyzed their significance. Students of politics find in the convention a demonstration of how diverse are the interests represented in the Democratic party. There is one question regarding the convention, how- ever, that has largely gone unanswered, and frequently un- asked. That is the question of how it happened that John W. Davis became the nominee of the party. This is an impor- tant question, for it represents the first time since 1860 that the party had gone south of the Mason-Dixon line for its candidate, unless Woodrow Wilson, born in Virginia, but nominated from New Jersey, be considered an exception. The nomination indicates also the triumph of the metropolitan element in the party that was to lead it to defeat in 1928. John W. Davis was the second choice, not of the forces which had kept William G. McAdoo in the lead during most of the convention, but of the forces of A1 Smith-the urban, Catholic, and financial interests in the party.
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016

    A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016

    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
  • Martin Van Buren National Historic Site

    Martin Van Buren National Historic Site

    M ARTIN VAN BUREN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY, 1974-2006 SUZANNE JULIN NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NORTHEAST REGION HISTORY PROGRAM JULY 2011 i Cover Illustration: Exterior Restoration of Lindenwald, c. 1980. Source: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction 1 Chapter One: Recognizing Lindenwald: The Establishment Of Martin Van Buren National Historic Site 5 Chapter Two: Toward 1982: The Race To The Van Buren Bicentennial 27 Chapter Three: Saving Lindenwald: Restoration, Preservation, Collections, and Planning, 1982-1987 55 Chapter Four: Finding Space: Facilities And Boundaries, 1982-1991 73 Chapter Five: Interpreting Martin Van Buren And Lindenwald, 1980-2000 93 Chapter Six: Finding Compromises: New Facilities And The Protection of Lindenwald, 1992-2006 111 Chapter Seven: New Possibilities: Planning, Interpretation and Boundary Expansion 2000-2006 127 Conclusion: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Administrative History 143 Appendixes: Appendix A: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Visitation, 1977-2005 145 Appendix B: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Staffi ng 147 Appendix C: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Studies, Reports, And Planning Documents 1936-2006 151 Bibliography 153 Index 159 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.1. Location of MAVA on Route 9H in Kinderhook, NY Figure 1.2. Portrait of the young Martin Van Buren by Henry Inman, circa 1840 Library of Congress Figure 1.3. Photograph of the elderly Martin Van Buren, between 1840 and 1862 Library of Congress Figure 1.4. James Leath and John Watson of the Columbia County Historical Society Photograph MAVA Collection Figure 2.1.
  • The Many and the One: Religion and Pluralism in American History Peter Lewek Montini Catholic High School Project: Selected Prim

    The Many and the One: Religion and Pluralism in American History Peter Lewek Montini Catholic High School Project: Selected Prim

    THE MANY AND THE ONE: RELIGION AND PLURALISM IN AMERICAN HISTORY PETER LEWEK MONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT: SELECTED PRIMARY SOURCE READINGS IN THE 20TH CENTURY This listing includes some examples of the interaction of religion and American society and culture in the 20th century. This listing is incomplete and also is not a balanced set of readings. 1900-1920 Jane Addams – 20 Years at Hull House (1910) Chapter 4 (pp.120-126) – Christian Humanitarianism Chapter 6 – the necessity of settlement houses and the motives of its workers Walter Rauschenbusch – Christianity and the Social Crisis (1913) Excerpts from Chapter 7 – “What to do- Social Evangelization and the Pulpit and the Social Question” Woodrow Wilson – 1912 Campaign Speech –“America was born a Christian nation” Chicago New World - editorials and news articles on the loyalty and Americanism of Chicago Catholic immigrants and their families (1915-1920) 1920-1940 The Scopes Trial 1) William Jennings Bryan – “Who Shall Control our Schools?” June, 1925 2) W.E.B. DuBois – “Scopes” – Crisis, September, 1925 3) Clarence Darrow –Autobiography, pp.244-255 – Chapter 29 – “The Evolution Case” Bruce Barton - The Man Nobody Knows (1925) – “Jesus as a Business Executive” Presidential Election of 1928: Alfred E. Smith – Campaign Addresses (1929) Herbert Hoover - Memoirs Father Charles Coughlin: Radio Speech for the National Union for Social Justice, November 11, 1934 Radio Speech – “President Roosevelt and Social Justice” Jan. 9, 1934 Detroit News excerpts and quotes of Father Charles Coughlin (1934-1943) Frances Perkins and Episcopalians 1940-1960 Dorothy Day – The Catholic Worker, June, 1942 - “Love is the Measure” Harry S.
  • The Corrupt Bargain

    The Corrupt Bargain

    The Corrupt Bargain Thematic Unit Introduction Drama! Intrigue! Scandal! The Presidential Election of 1824 was the most hotly-contested election in American history to that time. Join Andrew Jackson’s Hermitage, Home of the People’s President, in an interactive look at the election that changed the course of American history, examining the question of whether or not our nation is a republic, or a democracy. By referencing primary source documents such as the diary of John Quincy Adams, the official record of the electoral vote, the vote in the House of Representatives and personal letters from Andrew Jackson, students will be able to see a Revolutionary nation come into its own. Objectives A. Examine historical information from a variety of sources, including museum and library collections, letters, maps, government documents, oral histories, firsthand accounts, and web sites. B. Analyze documentation to uncover the events of the Presidential Election of 1824. C. Understand, through dialogue and discussion, how the Presidential Election of 1824 reflected the political climate of the era, its effect on John Quincy Adams’ presidency, and the future of American politics. Background A former cabinet member and Senator. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. A well-travelled international diplomat and the son of a Founding Father. An Indian- fighter, duelist, and powerhouse in Western politics. The Election of 1824 was the first election to that time in which there was not a majority of votes earned by a candidate. As a result, the election moved to the House of Representatives, where each state received one vote. John Quincy Adams, despite being outgained by almost 40,000 votes, won the presidency, and the campaign for the election of 1828 began almost immediately after claims from Jackson supporters alleged a “corrupt bargain” between Adams and Speaker of the House Henry Clay.
  • Methods and Philosophies of Managing American Presidential Scandals

    Methods and Philosophies of Managing American Presidential Scandals

    Public Disgrace: Methods and Philosophies of Managing American Presidential Scandals Travis Pritchett Pritchett !1 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................2 Corruption and Indiscretion: the Election of 1884........................................................................7 "Corrupt Bargain": A Phantom Scandal.......................................................................................11 Scandals of Abraham Lincoln: Insufficiently White Supremacist...............................................15 Scandals of Richard Nixon: Funding and Watergate...................................................................19 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................24 Bibliography.................................................................................................................................27 Pritchett !2 The study of political science is often seen as a study of political movements and mechanisms; more concerned with the patterns and statistics of human activity than with the basic human elements. But, ultimately, politics is a human construction, and any human construction is shaped by the human beings who created it and participate in it. Nowhere, perhaps, is this more apparent than in the idea of scandal, of a political secret whose potential to destabilize or alter politics at large comes entirely
  • The Election of 1824 I

    The Election of 1824 I

    Do Now 151, 383 Based on this chart, who became president in 1824? The Presidential Election of 1824 Henry Clay VS. William CrawfordVS. John Quincy Adams VS. Andrew Jackson Directions: 1. Google Classroom 2. Open: Election of 1824 What does the Constitution say? Amendment XII The person having the greatest number of [electoral] votes for President, shall be the President… and if no person have such majority... the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President...in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote. Is that fair? 39.3 million people 582,000 people Intro. Video What do you notice on the Electoral College Map? Type here The Election of 1824 I. Results Vs. A. No candidate won a majority of the electoral votes 1. Andrew Jackson gets most 2. John Quincy Adams get second most B. Constitutional Response 1. 12th Amendment determines what to do 2. House of Representatives will decide who becomes president ● Leader of the House of The Corrupt Bargain? Representatives ● Elected by the members of the majority party ● What they do: ○ Sets the order of issues discussed ○ Moderates debates ○ Determine who sits II. House of Representatives decides on what committee A. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House The Corrupt Bargain? B. The Deal 1. A newspaper published an unsigned letter. 2. Letter says that John Q. Adams promised Clay would become Secretary of State if he convinced people to vote for him. The Corrupt Bargain? C. Outcome Tally sheet showing each state’s vote 1.
  • The Peace Corps, What Shape Shall It Take?

    The Peace Corps, What Shape Shall It Take?

    PROSPECTS OF MANKIND: EPISODE 207: THE PEACE CORPS, WHAT SHAPE SHALL IT TAKE? March 5, 1961 Description: ER hosts a discussion on new legislation to create a Peace Corps and the objectives of the Peace Corps program. Participants: ER, John F. Kennedy, Sargent Shriver, Senteza Kajubi (identified on screen as “Senteca Kajubi”), Samuel Hays, Hubert Humphrey [Theme music begins 00:19] [Title Sequence:] [Text overlaid on Prospects of Mankind logo] National Educational Television / Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt / Prospects of Mankind [Bob Jones:] [Voice over] From Washington, DC, National Educational Television presents the WGBH- TV production: Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt, Prospects of Mankind. [Image of the White House] [Bob Jones:] [Voice over] On the day President Kennedy issued an executive order creating a Peace Corps, Mrs. Roosevelt went to the White House to discuss it with him. [Theme music ends 0:47 ] [ER:] Mr. President, you’re very kind indeed to give us a few words of introduction to the program, Prospects of Mankind, which is to be on the Peace Corps, which is one of your great interests. I would like to know how you originally thought of this. It seems to carry out your appeal for everyone to be of service in your inaugural address, but how did you come to invention--to think of it first? [John F. Kennedy:] Well, of course, it had been discussed by uh a good many Americans, and this idea of uh particularly young Americans using their uh desire for service for the uh benefit of mankind uh. Congressman [Henry] Reuss in the House, Senator [Hubert] Humphrey, and the others have been talking a good deal about it.