DOCSLIB.ORG

An Inventory and Assessment of National Urban Mobility in the Philippines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Inventory and Assessment of National Urban Mobility in the Philippines An Inventory and Assessment of National Urban Mobility in the Philippines A Project of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH in collaboration with the Philippine Department of Transportation (DOTr) 1 Contents List Of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1. Background of the Study ............................................................................................................. 14 1.2. Objectives and Scope .................................................................................................................. 15 1.3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 15 2. Inventory and Assessment of Mobility Indicators .................................................................................. 17 2.1. Socio-demographic and economic accounts .............................................................................. 17 2.2. State of Passenger and Goods Transport .................................................................................... 20 2.2.1. Public Transport Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 25 2.2.2. Non-motorized Transport Infrastructure .................................................................................. 28 2.2.3. Goods Transport Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 28 2.3. Planned Transport Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 30 2.4. Transport Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.1. Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................... 31 2.4.2. Road Safety ......................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.3. Air Quality and Health Impacts ........................................................................................... 33 3. Institutional Framework .......................................................................................................................... 34 3.1. Transport Plans, Programs and Policies ...................................................................................... 40 3.1.1. Evolution of Transport Policies ........................................................................................... 40 3.1.2. Past Transport Studies and Plans in Metro Manila, Cebu, and Davao ............................... 41 3.1.3. Recent Transport Policies.................................................................................................... 46 3.2. National Strategy for Urban Mobility ......................................................................................... 48 3.2.1. National Vision for Urban Mobility ..................................................................................... 48 3.2.2. National Vision of the Country ............................................................................................ 48 3.2.3. Transport as Part of the Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022 .................................... 49 3.2.4. National Transport Policy .................................................................................................... 49 3.2.5. National Urban Development and Housing Framework ..................................................... 50 3.3. Stakeholder Analysis on Urban Mobility ..................................................................................... 51 3.3.1. Local Government Units ..................................................................................................... 51 3.3.2. Other Urban Mobility Stakeholders .................................................................................... 57 4. Financing Transport ................................................................................................................................ 58 2 4.1. Financing sources ........................................................................................................................ 58 4.2. Central Government Budget ....................................................................................................... 59 4.2.1. Department of Public Works and Highways ....................................................................... 60 4.2.2. Department of Transportation ............................................................................................ 60 4.2.3. Taxation on transport related activities .............................................................................. 62 4.3. Local Government ....................................................................................................................... 64 4.4. Official Development Assistance (ODA) ....................................................................................... 66 4.4.1. Japanese International Co-operation Agency (JICA) ............................................................ 68 4.4.2. World Bank .......................................................................................................................... 68 4.4.3. Asian Development bank ..................................................................................................... 68 4.4.4. GIZ ....................................................................................................................................... 68 4.5. Households Expenditure on Transport ....................................................................................... 69 4.6. Transport Sector Revenues ......................................................................................................... 70 4.6.1. Tricycle ................................................................................................................................ 70 4.6.2. Jeepney ............................................................................................................................... 70 4.6.3. Bus ....................................................................................................................................... 71 4.6.4. Urban Rail ............................................................................................................................ 71 4.6.5. LRT Line 1 ............................................................................................................................ 72 4.6.6. LRT2 ..................................................................................................................................... 72 4.6.7. MRT3 ................................................................................................................................... 73 4.6.8. Taxi ...................................................................................................................................... 73 4.6.9. Public Transport Expenditure Summary ............................................................................. 74 4.7. Development banks, Commercial Banks and the Private Sector ................................................ 75 4.7.1. National Development Banks ............................................................................................. 75 4.7.2. Commercial Bank Finance ................................................................................................... 75 4.7.3. Private Sector Investors ...................................................................................................... 76 5. Review of Inventory and Diagnostic Analysis of Status Quo .................................................................. 77 5.1. Governance ................................................................................................................................. 77 5.1.1. Institutional and regulatory framework ............................................................................. 77 5.1.2. Transport and land use planning framework ...................................................................... 78 5.1.3. Strengths ............................................................................................................................. 80 5.1.4. Weaknesses......................................................................................................................... 80 5.1.5. Opportunities ...................................................................................................................... 81 3 5.1.6. Threats ................................................................................................................................ 82 5.1.7. Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 82 5.2. Budgeting and Finance ................................................................................................................ 83 5.2.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ( Office of the President ( Official Directory ( Official Calendar (
    Skip to (CFAHShAociottoQcenmtte tp Meea(s/r: ncsia(n//tip/bi dnw(i/eldiinxtweyd.xp weI.nhpxsp..hgpt/prfhuao)pcqv/t)ic.oponnhst a)(/cint-duesx).php/accessibility#) MMDA Offices 2012 MMDA Memorandum Circular No. 08 (/index.php/19-legal-matters/mmda-memorandum- circulars/282-2012-mmda-memorandum-circular-no-08) Written by Super User Category: MMDA Memorandum Circulars (/index.php/19-legal-matters/mmda-memorandum-circulars) Published: 23 January 2014 Hits: 402 2012 MMDA Memorandum Circular No. 04-A (/index.php/19-legal-matters/mmda- memorandum-circulars/281-2012-mmda-memorandum-circular-no-04-a) Written by Super User Category: MMDA Memorandum Circulars (/index.php/19-legal-matters/mmda-memorandum-circulars) Published: 23 January 2014 Hits: 234 REPUBLIKA NG PILIPINAS TANGGAPAN NG PANGULO Pangasiwaan sa Pagpapaunlad ng Kalakhang Maynila (Metropolitan Manila Development Authority) MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR SERIES OF 2012 TO: ALL CONCERNED SUBJECT: PRESCRIBING ALTERNATE ROUTES FOR TRUCKS AFFECTED BY MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 4, S. 2012, "IMPLEMENTING A TEMPORARY MODIFIED TRUCK BAN IN METROPOLITAN MANILA ON MAY 2 to 5, 2012 FOR THE 45TH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB) BOARD OF GOVERNORS ANNUAL MEETING AND FOR THIS PURPOSE, TEMPORARILY MODIFYING MMDA RESOLUTION NO. 07-05, SERIES of 2007." DATE: April 30, 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION: 1.1. On April 27, 2012 this Authority issued Memorandum Circular No. 4, Series of 2012 entitled: IMPLEMENTING A TEMPORARY MODIFIED TRUCK BAN IN METROPOLITAN MANILA ON MAY 2 to 5, 2012 FOR THE 45TH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB) BOARD OF GOVERNORS ANNUAL MEETING AND FOR THIS PURPOSE, TEMPORARILY MODIFYING MMDA RESOLUTION NO. 07-05, SERIES of 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Tracker – RAILS
    TAPP II: Infrastructure Tracker as of November 20, 2017 Funding Type Cost Private (GPH, ODA, Phase/Status No. Sector Location Project Name (in PhP or Agency Description Date of Information Counterpart PPP, Private, (Completion Date) US$ B) PDMF) Rails Projects Phase 1: 50.5 km from the Malolos end of North-South Commuter Railway up to Clark Rails North-South Railway Project (north line) Phase 1 construction: Q2 2019 1 Luzon DOTr airport will have five stations—Malolos, ODA/GOJ 06-Jun-17 Projects (Malolos-Clark Railway Phase 1) Completion: Q2 2022 Apalit, San Fernando City, Clark and Clark ₱ 211.42 International Airport. Phase 2: 19 km railway to connect airport to Rails North-South Railway Project (north line) Clark Green City through three more 2 Luzon DOTr ODA/GOJ 06-Jun-17 Projects (Malolos-Clark Railway Phase 2) stations—Calumpit, Angeles City and Clark Green City. Financing, design, construction, operation & maintenance of 23km elevated railway line with 14 stations from San Jose Del Monte, Under Construction Rails 3 NCR MRT Line 7 Project ₱ 69.30 DOTr SMC Bulacan to MRT 3 North Avenue in Quezon PPP (unsolicited) On-going civil works 20-Oct-17 Projects City and 22km asphalt road from Bocaue (10.35% complete) Interchange of NLEX to intermodal terminal in Tala. A Brown Construction, operation and maintenance of Company Inc., Rails 11-station East-West Rail (EWR), a mostly 4 NCR East-West Rail Project $ 1.00 PNR and MTD PPP (unsolicited) For evaluation by ICC-TWG 20-Nov-17 Projects elevated 9.4km railway line from Diliman, Philippines, Quezon City to Lerma, Manila.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Solutions for Metro Manila: a Realistic Approach Traffic
    Traffic Solutions for Metro Manila: A Realistic Approach Traffic congestion and traffic discipline are perennial discussions at coffee shops and in meeting rooms throughout Metro Manila. It is an accepted fact that congestion hinders the free flow of goods and services, contributes significantly to pollution, and costs billions of pesos (billions!) in wasted fuel, time and productivity. Studies have been done, solutions proposed, and money spent for years, with little real improvement to show for the expense. Those tasked with managing the problem, from one administration to the next, have all clung persistently to the same mantra – that the answer lies in more roadways and the use of the latest high-tech gadgets. I would like to offer an alternative opinion: Traffic in Metro Manila is congested and chaotic because we allow it to be that way. 'We' in this case refers to both the road users and the road managers. We don't follow, or effectively enforce, the basic rules which are designed to ensure a safe, efficient flow of traffic. We don't respect lane markings (including turn lanes), we ignore traffic signs and signals, and we routinely drive in ways that are both dangerous and disruptive to the flow of traffic. Pedestrians cross wherever they want, and they stand in the roadway in large numbers while waiting for public transportation. Public buses and jeepneys operate aggressively and dangerously. Each of these behaviors, repeated at thousands of points across Metro Manila roadways every day, disrupt the free flow of traffic and cause the congestion and chaos that we have come to accept as normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Riders Digest 2019
    RIDERS DIGEST 2019 PHILIPPINE EDITION Rider Levett Bucknall Philippines, Inc. OFFICES NATIONWIDE LEGEND: RLB Phils., Inc Office: • Manila • Sta Rosa, Laguna • Cebu • Davao • Cagayan de Oro • Bacolod • Iloilo • Bohol • Subic • Clark RLB Future Expansions: • Dumaguete • General Santos RIDERS DIGEST PHILIPPINES 2019 A compilation of cost data and related information on the Construction Industry in the Philippines. Compiled by: Rider Levett Bucknall Philippines, Inc. A proud member of Rider Levett Bucknall Group Main Office: Bacolod Office: Building 3, Corazon Clemeña 2nd Floor, Mayfair Plaza, Compound No. 54 Danny Floro Lacson cor. 12th Street, Street, Bagong Ilog, Pasig City 1600 Bacolod City, Negros Occidental Philippines 6100 Philippines T: +63 2 234 0141/234 0129 T: +63 34 432 1344 +63 2 687 1075 E: [email protected] F: +63 2 570 4025 E: [email protected] Iloilo Office: 2nd Floor (Door 21) Uy Bico Building, Sta. Rosa, Laguna Office: Yulo Street. Iloilo Unit 201, Brain Train Center City Proper, Iloilo, 5000 Lot 11 Block 3, Sta. Rosa Business Philippines Park, Greenfield Brgy. Don Jose, Sta. T:+63 33 320 0945 Rosa City Laguna, 4026 Philippines E: [email protected] M: +63 922 806 7507 E: [email protected] Cagayan de Oro Office: Rm. 702, 7th Floor, TTK Tower Cebu Office: Don Apolinar Velez Street Brgy. 19 Suite 602, PDI Condominium Cagayan De Oro City Archbishop Reyes Ave. corner J. 9000 Philippines Panis Street, Banilad, Cebu City, 6014 T: +63 88 8563734 Philippines M: +63 998 573 2107 T: +63 32 268 0072 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Subic Office: Davao Office: The Venue Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in Cdi Cities
    ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 JANUARY 27, 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and do not necessarily reflect the view of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page i Pre-Feasibility Study for the Upgrading of the Tagbilaran City Slaughterhouse ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 Program Title: USAID/SURGE Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Philippines Contract Number: AID-492-H-15-00001 Contractor: International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Date of Publication: January 27, 2017 USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page ii Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in CDI Cities Contents I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 7 II. Methodology 9 A. Research Methods 9 B. Diagnostic Tool to Assess Urban-Rural Connectivity 9 III. City Assessments and Recommendations 14 A. Batangas City 14 B. Puerto Princesa City 26 C. Iloilo City 40 D. Tagbilaran City 50 E. Cagayan de Oro City 66 F. Zamboanga City 79 Tables Table 1. Schedule of Assessments Conducted in CDI Cities 9 Table 2. Cargo Throughput at the Batangas Seaport, in metric tons (2015 data) 15 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation History of the Philippines
    Transportation history of the Philippines This article describes the various forms of transportation in the Philippines. Despite the physical barriers that can hamper overall transport development in the country, the Philippines has found ways to create and integrate an extensive transportation system that connects the over 7,000 islands that surround the archipelago, and it has shown that through the Filipinos' ingenuity and creativity, they have created several transport forms that are unique to the country. Contents • 1 Land transportation o 1.1 Road System 1.1.1 Main highways 1.1.2 Expressways o 1.2 Mass Transit 1.2.1 Bus Companies 1.2.2 Within Metro Manila 1.2.3 Provincial 1.2.4 Jeepney 1.2.5 Railways 1.2.6 Other Forms of Mass Transit • 2 Water transportation o 2.1 Ports and harbors o 2.2 River ferries o 2.3 Shipping companies • 3 Air transportation o 3.1 International gateways o 3.2 Local airlines • 4 History o 4.1 1940s 4.1.1 Vehicles 4.1.2 Railways 4.1.3 Roads • 5 See also • 6 References • 7 External links Land transportation Road System The Philippines has 199,950 kilometers (124,249 miles) of roads, of which 39,590 kilometers (24,601 miles) are paved. As of 2004, the total length of the non-toll road network was reported to be 202,860 km, with the following breakdown according to type: • National roads - 15% • Provincial roads - 13% • City and municipal roads - 12% • Barangay (barrio) roads - 60% Road classification is based primarily on administrative responsibilities (with the exception of barangays), i.e., which level of government built and funded the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Employee Shuttle Service for Employees of Makati CBD Rodney Asinas Urban and Transport Planner, Senior Associate Ayala Land, Inc
    Designing Employee Shuttle Service for Employees of Makati CBD Rodney Asinas Urban and Transport Planner, Senior Associate Ayala Land, Inc. Previously presented at the 12th International Conference of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EASTS) in September 2017 at the Sheraton Hotel, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam Table of Contents • Introduction • Problem & Objectives • Hypothesis • Scope and Limitations • Methodology • Sample Size • Survey Results • Potential Routes • Summary & Recommendations INTRODUCTION Estimated Number of Trips per Day Modal Split in Makati CBD 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Vehicles 67,369 7,735 Private Public Year Pax 80,843 329,619 • Around 12.8 million person trips are made per day in Metro Manila (JICA Dream Plan,2014) • Around 78% of road occupancy is taken up by private vehicles, while only transporting 31% of total person trips • In Makati CBD, road occupancy of private vehicles at Makati CBD goes up to 90% (ALI internal traffic study, 2008) PROBLEM: Due to worsening traffic conditions in Metro Manila, commuter and driving experience continue to deteriorate affecting employee productivity OBJECTIVE: Identify a feasible alternative transportation modes that would be acceptable to the company, employee, and transport provider o Understand demand side by • Origins and Destinations • Mode Preference analyzing current travel patterns • Trip Chain • Estimated Travel Demand • Willingness to Pay o Determine routes to be served and identify appropriate alternate • Based on demand, identify routes which will be served mode of transportation which will • Identify parameters which satisfy employee best serve both the company and preferences employees HYPOTHESIS: Numerous factors affect employees’ decision in choosing his/her way of travel : • Socio-economic • Travel preferences o Rank in the company o Convenience and o Gender Comfort o Travel Cost o Promptness o Seating • Geography-related o Cost o Location of residence o Frequency of trips o Travel time o Number of transfers SCOPE AND LIMITATION: Study limited to Makati CBD employees.
    [Show full text]
  • BAC CHARLIE Infrastructure Procurement Monitoring Report
    CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Procurement Monitoring Report (January -December 2020) INFRASTRUCTURE Code Procurement Program/Project PMO/ Mode of Actual Procurement Activity Source of ABC (PhP) Contract Cost (PhP) List of Invited Date of Receipt of Invitation Remarks (UACS/PA End-User Procurement Funds Observers (Explaining changes from P) Pre-Proc Ads/Post of IB Pre-bid Conf Eligibility Sub/Open of Bid Evaluation Post Qual Notice of Contract Signing Notice to Delivery/ Inspection & Total MOOE CO Total MOOE CO Pre-bid Conf Eligibility Sub/Open of Bid Evaluation Post Qual Delivery/ Delivery Period Conference Check Bids Award Proceed Completion Acceptance Check Bids Completion/ the APP) Acceptance (If applicable) COMPLETED PROCUREMENT ACTIVITIES Construction of Perimeter Fence at ADMS - 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 120 Calendar PB 08/02/2019 8/20/2019 08/28/2020 09/24/2019 10/15/2019 01/07/2020 02/19/2020 03/11/2020 6,876,230.51 5,943,827.40 COA,ASFI & PCCI 08/28/2020 09/24/2019 10/15/2019 Ongoing Bislig Airport DOTr 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 days Improvement of Airport Facilities at ADMS - 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 9/20/2019 360 Calendar PB 08/02/2019 8/20/2019 08/28/2020 09/26/2019 10/15/2019 1/23/2020 02/19/2020 03/11/2020 71,052,270.54 67,297,993.93 COA,ASFI & PCCI 08/28/2020 09/26/2019 10/15/2019 Ongoing Calbayog Airport DOTr 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 9/11/2019 days Busuanga Airport Development Project (Improvement of Drainage System and Rehabilitation of ADMS - 10/30/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019
    [Show full text]
  • SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS of the REPUBLIC of the PHILIPPINES First Regular Session '.7 O F
    SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES First Regular Session '.7 o f SENATE Introduced by Senator Poe RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES TO REVIEW THE DISCRETION AND POWER GIVEN TO THE LAND TRANSPORTATION FRANCHISING AND REGULATORY BOARD TO PRESCRIBE ROUTES FOR UV EXPRESS VEHICLES, WITH THE END GOAL OF FORMULATING MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT DUE PROCESS, PROPER CONSULTATION WITH ALL STAKEHOLDERS, AND REASONABLE CRITERIA AND PARAMETERS SHALL BE OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF ROUTE SELECTION AND/OR ALTERATION OF THE SAME WHEREAS, the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that the State shall promote a rising standard of living and an improved quality of life for all;1 WHEREAS, the worsening traffic congestion in urban areas, particularly in Metro Manila, has led to excessively long commute times for public and private commuters and a deterioration of the overall quality of life; WHEREAS, the productivity cost of the current transportation crisis has been estimated to be within the region of Php2.4 Billion per day, or more than PhpSOO Billion per year; WHEREAS, a prevalent mode of public transportation in Metro Manila and its nearby cities, munieipalities or provinces is the “UV Express” vehicle that caters to a vast group of commuters from Bulacan, Cavite, Rizal and all around Metro Manila, among the urban areas afflicted with traffie; WHEREAS, the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) has the authority to: (a) prescribe and regulate routes of service, economically viable capacities and zones or areas of operation of public land transportation services provided by motorized vehicles;2 and (b) issue, amend, revise, suspend or cancel Certificates of Public Convenience or permits authorizing the operation of public Land Transportation services provided by motorized vehicles, and to prescribe the appropriate terms and conditions therefore, among others;3 1 Section 9, Article II of the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018
    Republic of the Philippines National Economic and Development Authority Manila Bay Sustainable Development Master Plan MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018 MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018 i Table of Contents Preface, v Administrative and Institutional Systems, 78 Introduction, 1 Administrative Boundaries, 79 Natural Resources Systems, 6 Stakeholders Profile, 85 Climate, 7 Institutional Setup, 87 Topography, 11 Public-Private Partnership, 89 Geology, 13 Budget and Financing, 91 Pedology, 15 Policy and Legal Frameworks, 94 Hydrology, 17 National Legal Framework, 95 Oceanography, 19 Mandamus Agencies, 105 Land Cover, 21 Infrastructure, 110 Hazard Prone Areas, 23 Transport, 111 Ecosystems, 29 Energy, 115 Socio-Economic Systems, 36 Water Supply, 119 Population and Demography, 37 Sanitation and Sewerage, 121 Settlements, 45 Land Reclamation, 123 Waste, 47 Shoreline Protection, 125 Economics, 51 State of Manila Bay, 128 Livelihood and Income, 55 Water Quality Degradation, 129 Education and Health, 57 Air Quality, 133 Culture and Heritage, 61 Habitat Degradation, 135 Resource Use and Conservation, 64 Biodiversity Loss, 137 Agriculture and Livestock, 65 Vulnerability and Risk, 139 Aquaculture and Fisheries, 67 References, 146 Tourism, 73 Ports and Shipping, 75 ii Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank ISF Informal Settlers NSSMP National Sewerage and Septage Management Program AHLP Affordable Housing Loan Program IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature NSWMC National Solid Waste Management Commission AQI Air Quality Index JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency OCL Omnibus Commitment Line ASEAN Association of Southeast Nations KWFR Kaliwa Watershed Forest Reserve OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management LGU Local Government Unit OIDCI Orient Integrated Development Consultants, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report
    10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao PDR Intergovernmental Tenth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia 2030 Road Map for Sustainable Transport ~Aligning with Sustainable Transport Development Goals (SDGs)~ Country Report (Draft) The Philippines ------------------------------------- This country report was prepared by the Government of The Philippines as an input for the Tenth Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. 10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao-PDR a) Philippines Country EST Report b) Department of Transportation (covering from Nepal EST c) List other Line Ministries/Agencies contributing to preparation of the Country Forum 2015 to Lao EST Report: Forum 2017) d) Reporting period: 2015-2017 With the objective of demonstrating the renewed interest and commitment of Asian countries towards realizing a promising decade (2010-2020) of sustainable actions and measures for achieving safe, secure, affordable, efficient, and people and environment-friendly transport in rapidly urbanizing Asia, the participating countries of the Fifth Regional EST Forum in Asia discussed and agreed on a goodwill and voluntary declaration - “Bangkok Declaration for 2020 – Sustainable Transport Goals for 2010-2020.” At the Seventh Regional EST Forum held in Bali in 2013, the participating countries adopted the “Bali Declaration on Vision Three Zeros- Zero Congestion, Zero Pollution and Zero Accidents towards Next Generation Transport Systems in Asia” reinforcing the implementation of Bangkok 2020 Declaration (2010-2020) with emphasis to zero tolerance towards congestion, pollution and road accidents in the transport policy, planning and development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Philippine Cities' Initiatives
    A Case Study of Philippine Cities’ Initiatives | June – December 2017 © KCDDYangot /WWF-Philippines | Sustainable Urban Mobility — Philippine Cities’ Initiatives © IBellen / WWF-Philippines ACKNOWLEDGMENT WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organizations, with over 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 100 countries. WWF-Philippines has been working as a national organization of the WWF network since 1997. As the 26th national organization in the network, WWF-Philippines has successfully been implementing various conservation projects to help protect some of the most biologically-significant ecosystems in Asia. Our mission is to stop, and eventually reverse the accelerating degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature. The Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Case Study of Philippine Cities’ Initiatives is undertaken as part of the One Planet City Challenge (OPCC) 2017-2018 project. Project Manager: Imee S. Bellen Researcher: Karminn Cheryl Dinney Yangot WWF-Philippines acknowledges and appreciates the assistance extended to the case study by the numerous respondents and interviewees, particularly the following: Baguio City City Mayor Mauricio Domogan City Environment and Parks Management Officer, Engineer Cordelia Lacsamana City Tourism Officer, Jose Maria Rivera Department of Tourism, Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR) Regional Director Marie Venus Tan Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Associations—Baguio-Benguet-La Union (FEJODABBLU) Regional President Mr. Perfecto F. Itliong, Jr. Cebu City City Mayor Tomas Osmeña City Administrator, Engr. Nigel Paul Villarete City Environment and Natural Resources Officer, Ma. Nida Cabrera Cebu City BRT Project Manager, Atty.
    [Show full text]