Lasiurus Cinereus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lasiurus Cinereus) GENERAL NOTES NORTHWESTERN NATURALIST 97:130–134 AUTUMN 2016 ANOTHER ACCOUNT OF INTERSPECIFIC AGGRESSION INVOLVING A HOARY BAT (LASIURUS CINEREUS) ALYSON FBROKAW,JEFF CLERC, AND THEODORE JWELLER ABSTRACT—We observed an incident of interspe­ similar vocalizations when caught in a mist net, cific aggression between a male Hoary Bat (Lasiurus though no bats were in the nets. At 21:15, we cinereus) and a male Silver-haired Bat (Lasionycteris observed 2 bats engaged in an apparent physical noctivagans). The Silver-haired Bat suffered few interaction on the stream bank approximately 5 external injuries, the most conspicuous of which m ahead of us and 3 m from the nearest net. As were a missing lower right canine and small puncture wounds on the left wing membrane. The we approached, one of the bats flew off. We Hoary Bat experienced much more extensive external immediately identified it as a Hoary Bat (aver­ age mass at our study site 23 g) by its distinct injuries, including sub-dermal bleeding on wing and ¼ tail membranes and bite marks and tears in both size, coloration, and flight style. We retrieved the wings. Few published accounts describe physical 2nd bat from the ground, and identified it as a altercations among bats, but Hoary Bats are fre­ male Silver-haired Bat. quently involved. Rabies is often implicated as a Upon physical examination of the Silver- driving factor in the aggressive interactions. We haired Bat, we noted blood on its mouth and a decided not to euthanize the bat for rabies testing, missing lower right canine tooth (Fig. 1). The but encourage others who encounter these types of only other external evidence of injury was a interactions to have bats tested. puncture hole on the left wing between the 3rd Key words: bat, Hoary Bat, interspecific aggres­ and 4th digits. It was an adult male with non- sion, Lasionycteris noctivagans, Lasiurus cinereus, rabies, descended testes and 25% filling of the epidi­ Silver-haired Bat dymes (forearm 42.5 mm, mass 7.8 g), which is typical of Silver-haired Bats captured in May at Aggressive interactions between North Amer­ this site. During standard measurement proce­ ican bats have rarely been reported (Bell 1980), dures, the Silver-haired Bat displayed no unusu­ but are occasionally observed on foraging al behaviors. When released, the bat flew away grounds, usually as chasing or pursuing flight normally. patterns (Ransome 1990). Bats sometimes emit Approximately 10 min after retrieving the agonistic social calls during these encounters as Silver-haired Bat from the ground, we captured they defend foraging space or prey items a male Hoary Bat (non-descended testes, no (Barlow and Jones 1997). Encounters that result epididymal filling, forearm 54.3 mm, mass ¼ ¼ in physical contact are even more rarely ob­ 21.1 g) in the net nearest to where the bats had served and, in North America, usually involve been observed on the ground. The Hoary Bat Hoary Bats (Lasiurus cinereus; Table 1). exhibited a much more extensive set of external We observed an incident that we believe injuries than had the Silver-haired Bat. When represents interspecific aggression on 14 May fully extended, the uropatagium displayed sub- 2015, while mist netting along Bull Creek, dermal bleeding and bruising along almost the Humboldt Redwoods State Park (UTM: Zone entire length of the tail vertebrae (from the anus 10 N, 416309E, 4467328N, WGS84). Humboldt to approximately 5 mm from the tip of the tail; Redwoods State Park protects remnant stands of Fig. 2a). The right wing displayed similar levels old-growth Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervi­ of bruising between the elbow and the thumb. rens) and is a migratory stopover site for several There were a few tears in the right wing species of bats. At 21:05, during a routine net membrane, including a large bloody one be­ check, we heard audible ‘‘distress’’ calls of a bat tween the 5th digit and the leg. The left wing emanating from a small stand of Red Alder was not bruised, but showed noticeable bite (Alnus rubra) along the creek channel. Silver- marks in multiple places, and was bloody at the haired Bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans; average base of the thumb joint and between digits 2–4 mass at our study site 10 g) often produce (Fig. 2b). The Hoary Bat behaved normally ¼ 130 AUTUMN 2016 GENERAL NOTES 131 TABLE 1. Previously reported observations of physical aggression in North American insectivorous bats. NA ¼ not available. Presumed aggressor Presumed victim Rabies? Reference Lasiurus cinereus/borealis Perimyotis subflavus NA Bishop 1947 Lasiurus cinereus Parastrellus hesperus NA Orr 1950 Lasiurus cinereus Lasionycteris noctivagans Confirmed Bell 1980 Tadarida brasiliensis Eptesicus fuscus Lasiurus cinereus Perimyotis subflavus NA Krynak and Riebe 2013 Lasiurus borealis Nycticieus humeralis Confirmed Sasse and others 2014 during handling, but when we attempted to bat was moved to the ground, it had left the release it, it remained still, chewing on the cotton area. We assume that it flew off because we were holding bag. After several attempts to encourage able to completely search the ground within a 5­ the bat to fly, we placed it on the trunk of a m radius of the tree trunk, as most of the area nearby tree. When touched, the bat would lift its was covered in asphalt and the remaining area head and behave aggressively. It hung on the was bare soil. tree for approximately 20 min before we moved Given the low levels of bat activity at the site it to an asphalt parking lot surface after it on this particular night (these were the only 2 grabbed the cloth bag with its teeth and could bats captured) and the spatial and temporal not be safely separated. Five minutes after the proximity between the net in which the Hoary FIGURE 1. Silver-haired Bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans) with missing lower right canine. Photograph by J Clerc. 132 NORTHWESTERN NATURALIST 97(2) FIGURE 2. a) Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus) with uropatagium extended, showing extent of subdermal bruising along the tail vertebrae; b) thumb and wing damage on the left wing. Photographs by W Brokaw. Bat was captured and our initial observation of haired Bat apparently stunned on the ground. In the interaction, we strongly suspect that the our study area, intraspecific encounters between captured bats were the 2 interacting individuals Hoary Bats are frequently observed, particularly and that the injuries observed on each bat were a during autumn. We commonly observe Hoary result of the observed interaction. Although Bats pursuing one another in flight, as well as injuries including broken phalanges, wing punc­ instances where one has been captured in a mist tures, and blood in the mouth are occasionally net and another Hoary Bat dives at it (Weller and observed during mist netting, an individual bat Giordano 2013). In addition, Hoary Bats are rarely has all of these injuries at the same time. known to actively investigate the playback of We have not previously observed missing teeth both Hoary Bat and Silver-haired Bat social calls or injuries to the tail in bats captured in mist (Reyes 2015), which may be interpreted as nets. aggressive behavior. We found only 5 published accounts of Several hypotheses explaining intra- and physical altercations among bats in North interspecific interactions involving Hoary Bats America, and Hoary Bats have been implicated have been suggested. Defense of foraging areas in most of these interspecific encounters (Table is one possibility, but in the present case, seems 1). These accounts describe interspecific aggres­ unlikely because Silver-haired Bats and Hoary sion between Hoary Bats and other smaller bat Bats likely have other means of partitioning species (Bishop 1947; Orr 1950; Bell 1980). Bell food resources, such as temporal shifts or (1980) observed a Hoary Bat aggressively chase habitat shifts during foraging (Barclay 1985) and bite 3 different species in a single foraging and may not exhibit much dietary overlap bout. This bat was later confirmed to have been (Reimer and others 2010). It has been suggested rabid. In all cases, Hoary Bats were the that Hoary Bats may occasionally prey on presumed aggressor (Table 1). In the interaction smaller bats (Bishop 1947), though no direct we observed, it was unclear which bat initiated evidence of feeding has been observed. Territo­ the encounter. Although the Hoary Bat appeared rial defense to protect mating resources has also to sustain more injuries than the Silver-haired been proposed (Cryan 2008), particularly where Bat, Hoary Bats are larger, have a history of large trees are present. This explanation could aggressive physical attacks and in this case, apply to our study area, which contains very upon our disturbance, flew off leaving the Silver- tall trees, has a highly male-biased population, AUTUMN 2016 GENERAL NOTES 133 and is a place where frequent intraspecific District for granting us access and permission to interactions have been observed (Weller and conduct research. Comments from P Cryan, C Willis, Giordano 2013). W Zielinski, and an anonymous reviewer improved A final possibility is that the interaction we the manuscript. observed was rabies-mediated. Rabies has been implicated in several of the interactions ob­ LITERATURE CITED served previously (Table 1). Neither of the bats BARCLAY RMR. 1985. Long- versus short-range foraging exhibited behaviors suggestive of rabies virus strategies of Hoary (Lasiurus cinereus) and Silver- infection (for example, abnormally aggressive Haired (Lasionycteris noctivagans) Bats and the or paralytic behavior) during processing, but consequences for prey selection. Canadian Journal the Hoary Bat behaved unusually upon release, of Zoology 63:2507–2515. biting at the bag and not flying off. This may BARLOW KE, JONES G. 1997. Function of Pipistrelle social have resulted from the stress of the interaction calls: Field data and a playback experiment.
Recommended publications
  • Bat Conservation 2021
    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Management and Bats
    F orest Management a n d B a t s | 1 Forest Management and Bats F orest Management a n d B a t s | 2 Bat Basics More than 1,400 species of bats account for almost a quarter of all mammal species worldwide. Bats are exceptionally vulnerable to population losses, in part because they are one of the slowest-reproducing mammals on Earth for their size, with most producing only one young each year. For their size, bats are among the world’s longest-lived mammals. The little brown bat can live up to 34 years in the wild. Contrary to popular misconceptions, bats are not blind and do not become entangled in human hair. Bats are the only mammals capable of true flight. Most bat species use an extremely sophisticated biological sonar, called echolocation, to navigate and hunt for food. Some bats can detect an object as fine as a human hair in total darkness. Worldwide, bats are a primary predator of night-flying Merlin Tuttle insects. A single little brown bat, a resident of North American forests, can consume 1,000 mosquito-sized insects in just one hour. All but three of the 47 species of bats found in the United States and Canada feed solely on insects, including many destructive agricultural pests. The remaining bat species feed on nectar, pollen, and the fruit of cacti and agaves and play an important role in pollination and seed dispersal in southwestern deserts. The 15 million Mexican free-tailed bats at Bracken Cave, Texas, consume approximately 200 tons of insects nightly.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Damage Ecology & Management
    LIVING WITH WILDLIFE IN WISCONSIN: SOLVING NUISANCE, DAMAGE, HEALTH & SAFETY PROBLEMS – G3997-012 Bat Damage Ecology & Management As the world’s only true flying mammal, bats have extremely interesting lifestyles. They belong to the order Chiroptera, S W F S U – which means “hand wing.” There are s t a b n w ro approximately 1,400 species of bats world- b le tt li g in at wide, with 47 species residing in the United n er ib States. Wisconsin was home to nine bat species H at one time (there was one record of the Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis, in Wisconsin), but only eight species are currently found in the state. Our Wisconsin bats are a diverse group of animals that are integral to Wisconsin’s well-being. They are vital contributors to the welfare of Wisconsin’s economy, citizens, and ecosystems. Unfortunately, some bat species may also be in grave danger of extinction in the near future. DESCRIPTION “Wisconsin was home to nine bat species at one time, but All Wisconsin’s bats have only eight species are currently found in the state. egg-shaped, furry bodies, ” large ears to aid in echolo- cation, fragile, leathery wings, and small, short legs and feet. Our bats are insectivores and are the primary predator of night-flying insects such as mosquitoes, beetles, moths, and June bugs. Wisconsin’s bats are classified The flap of skin as either cave- or tree- connecting a bat’s legs is called the dwelling; cave-dwelling bats uropatagium. This hibernate underground in structure can be used as an “insect caves and mines over winter net” while a bat is feeding in flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities
    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report Authors Steven K. Pelletier Kristian S. Omland Kristen S. Watrous Trevor S. Peterson Prepared under BOEM Contract M11PD00212 by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Herndon, VA Office of Renewable Energy Programs June 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY The report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report from BOEM or the National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Office of Renewable Energy Programs 5285 Port Royal Road 381 Elden Street, HM-1328 Springfield, Virginia 22161 Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: (703) 605-6040 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: [email protected] CITATION Pelletier, S.K., K.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections
    Prepared by the USGS National Wildlife Health Center Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover photo (D.G. Constantine) A Townsend’s big-eared bat. Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections By Denny G. Constantine Edited by David S. Blehert Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Constantine, D.G., 2009, Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1329, 68 p. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Constantine, Denny G., 1925– Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections / by Denny G. Constantine. p. cm. - - (Geological circular ; 1329) ISBN 978–1–4113–2259–2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Bats: Tricolored Bat1
    WEC389 Florida’s Bats: Tricolored Bat1 Emily Evans, Terry Doonan, and Holly K. Ober2 The tricolored bat, formerly known as the eastern pipistrelle, is the smallest bat found in the state of Florida (Figure 1). It weighs just 0.3 ounces or 8 grams (the weight of a nickel and a penny) and has an approximately 9-inch (210–260 mm) wingspan. Due to their small size and erratic flight pattern, tricolored bats are often mistaken for moths when seen in flight from a long distance away. Figure 2. Tricolored bats are found throughout the state of Florida, except the Keys. This species is considered one of the more colorful species Figure 1. Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus). Note the multi-colored of bats in the state. They have pinkish forearms (the bones strands of fur. Credits: Merlin Tuttle, Merlin Tuttle’s Bat Conservation that support the wings), black wing membranes, and fur ranging from silver-yellow to dark orange. The name refers Tricolored bats are found throughout the eastern United to the three colors (black, yellow, and brown) found on States and Central America and are known to occur in most individual hairs on the bat’s body (Figure 3). areas of Florida, with the exception of the Keys (Figure 2). Since they are rarely encountered within the state, tricol- ored bats are considered uncommon in Florida. 1. This document is WEC389, one of a series of the Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 2017. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Conservation Plan SOUTH CAROLINA
    SOUTH CAROLINA Bat Conservation Plan South Carolina Department of Natural Resources SOUTH CAROLINA BAT CONSERVATION PLAN Updated July 2019 Prepared by: Jennifer R. Kindel Wildlife Biologist South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 124 Wildlife Drive Union, SC 29379 This is the South Carolina Bat Conservation Plan. It has been revised and updated from the initial plan created in September 2015. This plan provides information on legal status, public health, conservation issues, natural history, habitat requirements, species-specific accounts, threats and conservation strategies for bat species known to occur in the state. The primary purpose of this plan is to summarize available information for these species and provide proactive strategies in order to help guide management and conservation efforts. Suggested citation: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. 2019. South Carolina Bat Conservation Plan. Columbia, South Carolina. 204 pp. Cover photo by Mary Bunch Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... v Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................................. v Bat Species in South Carolina................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Suspected Function of Prematernity Colonies of Eastern Pipistrelles, Perimyotis Subflavus, in Indiana
    2014. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 123(1):49–56 OCCURRENCE AND SUSPECTED FUNCTION OF PREMATERNITY COLONIES OF EASTERN PIPISTRELLES, PERIMYOTIS SUBFLAVUS, IN INDIANA John O. Whitaker, Jr.1 and Brianne L. Walters: Center for Bat Research, Outreach, and Conservation, Department of Biology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA Jacques Pierre Veilleux: Department of Biology, Franklin Pierce University, Rindge, NH 03461, USA Richard O. Davis: Clifty Falls State Park, Madison, IN 47250, USA ABSTRACT. During summer, some pregnant female Eastern Pipistrelles form colonies in buildings but most typically roost in clusters of live or dead leaves in trees. We provide evidence that some that ultimately roost in leaf clusters form temporary colonies in or on buildings in early spring, prior to moving to the leaf clusters where they give birth. We call these prematernity colonies, and define them as those formed for a short time following hibernation and before the bats move to their maternity roosts. Prematernity colonies form from late April to early May and individuals relocate to leaf clusters from late May to early June. The bats showed strong fidelity to prematernity roosts, returning annually. Time of occupancy during any one year averaged 26 days. Nine bats were radio-tracked during the transition from building to tree roosts and were found to use several different trees. Bats showed interannual fidelity to building roosts. Buildings may help colonies re-form after individuals migrate from their hibernacula. Also, they could provide a warmer or more stable microclimate for pregnant females. Keywords: Bats, bat roosts, Eastern Pipistrelles, prematernity colonies INTRODUCTION trelles (Perimyotis subflavus) (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Colored Bat (Perimyotis Subflavus) in Ontario
    Photos: Jordi Segers Little Brown Myotis Northern Myotis Tri-colored Bat Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus), Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis), Tri-colored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series 2019 Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act 2007 (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by Nine months after the completion of a recovery which the decline of an endangered, threatened, strategy a government response statement will or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, be published which summarizes the actions that and threats are removed or reduced to improve the Government of Ontario intends to take in the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the response to the strategy. The implementation of wild. recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species. A For more information recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs To learn more about species at risk recovery in and the threats to the survival and recovery of Ontario, please visit the Ministry of Environment, the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricolored Bat Perimyotis Subflavus
    Appendix A: Mammals Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Federal Listing N/A State Listing SC Global Rank G3/G4 State Rank S1 Very High Regional Status Photo by USFWS Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Populations of tricolored bats, like many other bat species, are believed to be decreasing, however the data is lacking in NH due to the very lopw population numbers. The likely reasons for the possible declines are White‐Nose Syndrome(WNS) along with the destruction or degradation of winter habitat (hibernacula) and summer habitat (roosting and foraging areas). Like other bat species, the tricolored bat’s life history is different from the typical life history of small mammals. Individuals are relatively long‐lived and have a low reproductive rate. Tricolored bats give birth to two young per year (Fujita and Kunz 1984), although only one may survive to reproductive age. The slow reproductive rate would, in turn, lead to a slow population recovery time. Since tricolored bats are found in cave/mine habitats that are relatively rare and at risk, this species is at risk of population decline if such habitats are lost or degraded. Tricolored bats are of conservation concern in New Hampshire for the above reasons and because of the lack of knowledge about the species’ population status in New Hampshire. Distribution Data on the current and historic range of tricolored bats in New Hampshire are too few to allow a regional population comparison. The winter distribution data of tricolored bats are limited to three mine localities with historically as many as five individuals in Mascot Lead Mine, three individuals in Mt.
    [Show full text]