OPSEU V. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 2197 COURT FILE NO.: CV-12-465269 DATE: 20160420
CITATION: OPSEU v. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 2197 COURT FILE NO.: CV-12-465269 DATE: 20160420 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Application under Rule 14.05 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, ss. 2(b), 2(d), 7, 15 and 24(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982 B E T W E E N: ) ) ONTARIO PUBLIC SERVICE ) Howard Goldblatt, Steven Barrett & EMPLOYEES UNION, LORIE ST. ) Charlene Wiseman, for ETFO, Applicant AMAND and ROBYN LAMBE ) ) David Wright, Jane Letton & Rebecca Applicants ) Stulberg, for the Ontario Public Service ) Employees Union, Applicant – and – ) ) Susan Ursel & Karen Enssien, for OSSTF, The Crown in Right of Ontario as ) Applicant represented by the MINISTER OF ) Katie Rowen & Kristen Allen, for Unifor, EDUCATION and the ATTORNEY ) Applicant GENERAL OF ONTARIO ) ) Andrew Lokan & Tina H. Lie, for CUPE, Respondents ) Applicant ) -and – ) ) ONTARIO PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS’ ) Robin K. Basu, Rochelle Fox & Michael ASSOCIATION ) Dunn, for the Crown in Right of Ontario, ) Respondent Intervenor ) ) ) ) Michael A. Hines, for the Ontario Public ) School Boards’ Association, Intervenor ) ) HEARD: December 14, 16-18, 21-22, 2015 LEDERER J.: Page: 2 INTRODUCTION [1] In 2012, various and many contracts for unionized workers in the education sector expired. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario (hereinafter, “Ontario”), the funder of public education sought to, and considered how to proceed to resolve the issues between it, school boards as the employers, and the employees (teachers, other professionals and support staff) and renew the contracts involved. The substantive process began during February 2012.
[Show full text]