DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Thursday Volume 507 18 March 2010 No. 60 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 18 March 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 951 18 MARCH 2010 952 the autumn. In fact, there was a public meeting in the House of Commons west midlands earlier this week. I will make sure that my hon. Friend is kept abreast of developments and Thursday 18 March 2010 that his views about the need to consult as many people as possible are taken on board before the autumn consultation begins. The House met at half-past Ten o’clock Jeremy Wright (Rugby and Kenilworth) (Con): As PRAYERS the Minister knows, the proposed line would run right through my constituency, including Burton Green, which the hon. Member for Coventry, South (Mr. Cunningham) [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] mentioned. In respect of the impact of the construction work, may I ask that information be made available on BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS two specific matters? First, will there need to be any extra land-take in order to complete the construction LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES BILL [LORDS] work? As the Minister will appreciate, the proposed line (BY ORDER) passes very close to residential properties in Burton Second Reading opposed and deferred until Thursday Green and elsewhere, and if people’s gardens are to be 25 March (Standing Order No. 20). affected, it would be helpful to know about that. Secondly, can he inform residents about any particular implications that may arise from the building of access shafts? Oral Answers to Questions Mr. Khan: The hon. Gentleman has raised very important issues, as he did the other day. On any potential extra land-take, he will be aware that the broadest width of TRANSPORT the area for the high speed rail will be about 25 metres, which is a lot, and the narrowest width will be 15 metres. The Minister of State was asked— We have asked High Speed 2 to go away and do further High Speed Rail work to minimise the disruption caused and to mitigate the effects on the constituents of the hon. Gentleman 1. Mr. Jim Cunningham (Coventry, South) (Lab): and other Members, and I will make sure he is kept What his most recent assessment is of the likely effects abreast of the progress we make. It is important that we on residents in the west midlands of the construction keep Members involved before the formal consultation works associated with the establishment of high-speed begins, and that we minimise any blight caused to their rail links. [322748] constituents. I give the hon. Gentleman an undertaking to do just that. The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Mr. Sadiq Khan): We would seek to minimise the effects of construction wherever possible. Initial decisions Mr. Ken Purchase (Wolverhampton, North-East) (Lab/ on whether to build a high-speed line and what route Co-op): We who live in the region welcome this that line should take will be taken in the light of the development. Although we are, of course, concerned autumn 2010 consultation. Thereafter, the full effects about the environmental impact, the Minister should and any associated mitigation measures would be subject give priority to highlighting the economic development to an environmental impact assessment as part of the opportunities that will arise from the line. Will he also hybrid Bill process, which would itself be subject to ensure that we develop the line in such a way that all further public scrutiny. those towns and cities just north of Birmingham do not miss out on what is an once-in-a-lifetime economic Mr. Cunningham: I thank my hon. Friend for that opportunity? answer. While I would welcome a high-speed rail line through the midlands because of the benefits it would bring, there is a concern about the corridor between Mr. Khan: My hon. Friend will be pleased to know Coventry and Warwickshire, particularly in the Burton that the preferred route will lead to benefits not only for Green area. Can my hon. Friend give an assurance that his neck of the woods, but for other parts of the there will be both adequate public consultation as soon country, as it will go to both Manchester and Leeds. In as possible so that residents’ views are taken into the construction phase, more than 10,000 jobs will be consideration, and a realistic impact study undertaken created, and there will be 2,000 permanent jobs. The of the possible effects in the area? Let me conclude, economic benefits to our country will be enormous. however, by repeating that I would welcome this scheme That is, of course, why my hon. Friend has been one of and the benefits it would bring, especially given that the the keenest advocates of High Speed 2. west midlands unemployment rate is 10 per cent. and its manufacturing base has been eroded. That link would Sir Patrick Cormack (South Staffordshire) (Con): be a shot in the arm for the region. Will the Minister bear it in mind that during my time in Mr. Khan: My hon. Friend has been a keen advocate the House the residents of South Staffordshire have had of High Speed 2, but he has also been keen to ensure their lives disrupted by the building of three motorways? that we are aware of some of the downsides of a Will he take that carefully into account and try to high-speed line. Consultations with local residents have ensure that there is the minimum possible disruption already begun in advance of the formal consultation in from this welcome development? 953 Oral Answers18 MARCH 2010 Oral Answers 954 Mr. Khan: I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question. lighting on the motorways. Local authorities will want We have been keen to try to learn the lessons from to consider, in the light of their local circumstances, previous mass infrastructure projects—not only massive developing policies that can address light pollution and motorway projects, but High Speed 1. Fifty per cent. of its impact on the night sky, as well as parallel policies, the preferred route will be either along existing transport such as those aimed at carbon reduction, that might corridors next to motorways, or next to used or disused drive them to turn off or dim their highway lighting. rail lines. That leaves 50 per cent. on virgin land. We need to make sure we learn the lessons and learn from New Rolling Stock previous mistakes, in order to minimise the disruption caused to the constituents of the hon. Gentleman and 3. John Howell (Henley) (Con): What plans he has for those of many more Members in other parts of the the procurement of new rolling stock in the next five country. years; and if he will make a statement. [322750] Mr. Brian Jenkins (Tamworth) (Lab): My constituents The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport will be affected by this track. They have just had to go (Chris Mole): The Department for Transport’s plans through the four-tracking of the west coast line. That focus on the steps that need to be taken to deliver caused disruption with no benefit to the people in my additional capacity specified in the high-level output part of the world. What can the Minister say to two of specification for the period 2009 to 2014 and the my constituents who have now found out via the media requirements to achieve its longer-term aspirations. that their property will be knocked down as it is on the permanent way for the building of this new line, when John Howell: The Association of Train Operating they were, in fact, actively seeking to downsize for Companies has complained about the level of micro- health reasons? What can the Minister offer them apart management and of overregulation by the Department from a consultation for the next six months? Can we for Transport in relation to the rolling stock. How is the afford to buy these people out, who need get off the Minister taking those complaints into account? Will we permanent way? see some scaling back of the Government’s role, for which we have long argued? Mr. Khan: I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s question. First, I am happy to meet him and his constituents to Chris Mole: It is the Department’s responsibility to discuss their concerns. Secondly, we have begun consultation ensure that we get rolling stock that is usable on the on an exceptional hardship scheme, over and above the long-term network. We develop proposals for additional statutory blight provisions for constituents such as those rolling stock in full consultation with the train operating he mentioned. Although I am confident that those two companies, which have, in the first instance, the immediate measures will deal with some of the concerns and they use for it. will mitigate the problems, I am afraid that they will not solve them altogether. I look forward to meeting him Mr. Clive Betts (Sheffield, Attercliffe) (Lab): I am and his constituents to try to address the genuine problems sure my hon. Friend is aware that proposals to improve that he has raised. the Sheffield to Manchester line are very welcome for the future. Of immediate concern, however, is the East Light Pollution Midlands Trains service between Norwich and Liverpool, because at peak periods the service between Sheffield 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 100 Years of Government Communication
    AZ McKenna 100 Years of Government Communication AZ McKenna John Buchan, the frst Director of Information appointed in 1917 Front cover: A press conference at the Ministry of Information, 1944 For my parents and grandparents © Crown copyright 2018 Tis publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identifed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. 100 YEARS OF GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must frstly record my thanks to Alex Aiken, Executive Director of Government Communication, who commissioned me to write this book. His interest in it throughout its development continues to fatter me. Likewise I am indebted to the Government Communication Service who have overseen the book’s production, especially Rebecca Trelfall and Amelie Gericke. Te latter has been a model of eficiency and patience when it has come to arranging meetings, ordering materials and reading every draft and redraft of the text over the last few months. I am also grateful for the efforts of Gabriel Milland – lately of the GCS – that laid much of the groundwork for the volume. However, I would never even have set foot in the Cabinet Ofice had Tom Kelsey of the Historians in Residence programme at King’s College London not put my name forward. I am also hugely grateful to numerous other people at King’s and within the wider University of London. In particular the contemporary historians of the Department of Political Economy – among them my doctoral supervisors Michael Kandiah and Keith Hamilton – and those associated with the International History Seminar of the Institute of Historical Research (IHR) – Michael Dockrill, Matthew Glencross, Kate Utting as well as many others – have been a constant source of advice and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government
    The government Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Financial services secretary Parliamentary under secretary of state Whips Gordon Brown has appointed a new cabinet Kevan Jones, 45 Lord McKenzie, 62 Lord Myners, 61 Claire Ward, 37 Lady Farrington, 68 (pictured) and team of junior ministers to govern Veterans Lady Thornton, 56 Lord Bach, 62 until the next election. Lord Mandelson was given Lord Tunnicliffe, 66 Lord Young, 67 a new title and an expanded department, Alistair Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Economic Secretary Parliamentary under secretary of state Lord Patel, 48 Quentin Davies, 64 Ian Pearson, 50 Bridget Prentice, 56 Darling stayed put and Peter Hain returned. There Jonathan Shaw, 43 Lord Brett, 67 are only five women around the cabinet table Defence equipment and support Disabled people Financial services Coroners and democratic engagement Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Exchequer secretary Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Deputy chief whip Chris Mole, 51 Lady Taylor, 61 Helen Goodman, 51 Kitty Ussher, 38 Lord Bach, 62 Dan Norris, 49 Lord Davies, 69 National networks International defence and security Supreme court, legal aid Parliamentary under secretary of state Minister of state Minister of state Minister of State Minister of state Parliamentary under secretary of state Parliamentary secretary Lords chief
    [Show full text]
  • The Machinery of Government (And How to Reform It) a Rescue Plan for the Public Sector William Norton
    The Machinery of Government (And how to reform it) A rescue plan for the public sector William Norton Foreword by Tim Montgomerie A ConservativeHome Special Report TheMachineryofGovern#3AC4A5.doc 1 William Norton is a qualified solicitor specialising in tax and business advice, with eight years experience working in the City, William has been an adviser on tax affairs and legislation to the Conservative frontbench since 1998. He was a member of the permanent staff of the James Review on Taxpayer Value (2004-5) and wrote the reports on Defra, DTI, the Department of Health and the Home Office. He was subsequently attached to the Conservative Party Policy Unit and oversaw the Kill Or Keep Review of quangos and the drafting of the Deregulation Bill proposals. William is a trustee of the Social Affairs Unit. William is the joint author (with Charles Elphicke) of The Case For Reducing Business Taxes (CPS Perspectives, 2006) and also Flatlining: Analysing the institutions running the NHS in London (TPA Value For Money Review Paper 1, 2006). Tim Montgomerie is the Editor of ConservativeHome.com William Norton would like to express his thanks for assistance and advice received from Matthew Elliott and James Frayne of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, Dan Lewis of the Economic Research Council and Mike Denham. This book builds upon research undertaken during the James Review and in that regard the author would like to acknowledge past assistance from David James, Tony Caplin and Iain Corby and also his former colleagues in the Conservative Party Policy Unit for advice at that time: Greg Clark, John Tate, Karen Bradley, Danny Kruger, Douglas Carswell, Peter Franklin and Scott Kelly.
    [Show full text]
  • Change in Government: the Agenda for Leadership
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Change in Government: the agenda for leadership Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume I: Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes and oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the committee website at www.parliament.uk/pasc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 September 2011 HC 714 Published on 22 September 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Nick de Bois MP (Conservative, Enfield North) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Michael Dugher MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Lib Dem, Leeds North West) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) The following member was also a member of the Committee during the inquiry. Mr Charles Walker MP (Conservative, Broxbourne) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146.
    [Show full text]
  • What's the R in OCR? Exploring OCR's RSA Heritage
    What’s the R in OCR? Exploring OCR’s RSA heritage – Paul Steer (Lecture first given by OCR’s Head of Policy Paul Steer to mark 25 years of vocational qualifications at Progress House in Coventry) Cast your mind back to the 1990s. Oasis and the Spice Girls were riding high in the charts and John Major found himself elected as a Conservative Prime Minister, much against what was predicted in the polls. The early 1990s were a time of recession; the Gulf War; ratification of the Maastricht treaty (complete with anti-Europe backbenchers); the forced exit from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism ("Black Wednesday"); the privatisation of British Rail; the National Lottery; Sunday shopping; the "Back to Basics" campaign; the Dangerous Dogs Act; and the Cones Hotline. You should be in the zone now. So it was that in 1990, the RSA Examinations Board which had offered vocational qualifications since the mid-1850s, relocated from London to brand new, purpose built premises in Coventry, complete with warehouse and print facilities. It also had barely a single meeting room – in one of RSA’s less prescient moments on the changing workplace, they predicted that meetings would become a thing of the past. And just a few years later, RSA Examinations Board and UCLES (the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate) merged to form OCR. Relocation, relocation, relocation Relocation out of London was to become something of a fashion, reaching a crescendo with Michael Lyons’ Review of Public Sector Relocations 2004 which led to a large part of the Department for Education and Skills moving to Sheffield, and to the consolidation of Coventry as something as a centre for education-related government including the Further Education Funding Council, soon to become the Learning and Skills Council, the Adult Learning Inspectorate and, eventually, the home of the new exams regulator, Ofqual.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page I
    Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page i The great local vote swindle Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page ii Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 1 The great local vote swindle The local government elections on 4 May 2006 Electoral Reform Society Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 2 Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 3 Contents 04 Executive summary 07 General introduction 13 London introduction 25 London borough by borough 57 The political parties and the London result 62 How STV could improve London borough elections 71 Metropolitan boroughs 77 Unitary and share districts 83 Mayoral elections 91 Women’s representation 97 Constituency projection of the 2006 local elections 107 Conclusion Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 4 Executive summary The May 2006 local election results provided cold with 8,506 votes elected 12 (subject to resolving a comfort for any of the national parties, and more returning officer error). This can lead to artificial importantly for people who believe in strong local polarisation of local politics. democracy. Although turnout was higher than in pSome councils see a large number of seats most recent sets of local elections, it was still changing hands on a small change in votes, as in disappointingly low. The electoral system produced a Richmond and Tamworth. situation in many parts of England in which council pSome ward elections are decided on ridiculously representation and control were an extremely small shares of those voting – 24.9 per cent of the distorted reflection of the votes cast by local people.
    [Show full text]
  • According to Tfl's Annual Report Mike Brown's Salary Was £310,734 Last Year
    Share 0 More Next Blog» Create Blog Sign In WEDNESDAY, 16 JANUARY 2013 Britain's best value senior railway manager? According to TfL's annual report Mike Brown's salary was £310,734 last year. Eye's Sectional Appendix Search The Fact Compiler To contact The Fact Compiler please email: [email protected] The Fact Compiler reads... A Transport of Delight Hierarchy 2 weeks ago Alycidon Rail - Roger Ford Behind The Water Tower One less steam engine in Poland 2 days ago Boris Watch Driverless Tube Trains – A He is managing director of both London Underground and London Hoax On The Public Overground, which together carry more passengers than the national 3 days ago rail network. Christian Wolmar According to the Standard today, based on an FOI request from Transport disasters are mostly a thing of the past – fingers @MayorWatch: crossed 1 day ago London Underground managing director Mike Brown did not claim for any taxis during 2010 and 2011. His total expenses for 2010 came to Cranmer £112 and in 2011 £710.95. Channel 4 News - as written by your daughter Good effort. 1 hour ago David Millward, Transport Editor Weather: thousands warned Telegrammed by The Fact Compiler at 11:35 to stay at home as snowstorm Labels: London Overground, London Underground, Mike Brown hits 4 hours ago Going Underground's Blog Steam Train on the London Newer Post Home Older Post Underground for 150th Tube Anniversary Celebrations 4 days ago Guy Fawkes' blog What Cameron Would Have Said in Amsterdam 38 minutes ago London Reconnections Crossrail Begins to Get Visible – Part 2 2 days ago Lone Star Parson Deadly Assault Weapon 1 week ago Longrider Been There, Done That 1 week ago National Railway Museum blog 100 years of station master memories 1 day ago Old Holborn The Unaccountable - Bexley Style 2 weeks ago Paul Bigland (Snapper) January's pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Government Communication
    AZ McKenna 100 Years of Government Communication AZ McKenna John Buchan, the frst Director of Information appointed in 1917 Front cover: A press conference at the Ministry of Information, 1944 For my parents and grandparents © Crown copyright 2018 Tis publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identifed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. 100 YEARS OF GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must frstly record my thanks to Alex Aiken, Executive Director of Government Communication, who commissioned me to write this book. His interest in it throughout its development continues to fatter me. Likewise I am indebted to the Government Communication Service who have overseen the book’s production, especially Rebecca Trelfall and Amelie Gericke. Te latter has been a model of eficiency and patience when it has come to arranging meetings, ordering materials and reading every draft and redraft of the text over the last few months. I am also grateful for the efforts of Gabriel Milland – lately of the GCS – that laid much of the groundwork for the volume. However, I would never even have set foot in the Cabinet Ofice had Tom Kelsey of the Historians in Residence programme at King’s College London not put my name forward. I am also hugely grateful to numerous other people at King’s and within the wider University of London. In particular the contemporary historians of the Department of Political Economy – among them my doctoral supervisors Michael Kandiah and Keith Hamilton – and those associated with the International History Seminar of the Institute of Historical Research (IHR) – Michael Dockrill, Matthew Glencross, Kate Utting as well as many others – have been a constant source of advice and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministers General Appoint- Party Policy and Events Election Ment Prime Minister
    English > Civilisation > U.K. > Latest Prime Ministers General Appoint- Party Policy and events Election ment Prime Minister ....................................., .....................................; News of the World phone hacking ................................. ....................... scandal; Referendum on ..............................................; Opposition to EU; Deputy PM Controversies over Arms sales to Middle East countries; Response to Civil War in ................................. ....................... 2010 2010 Syria and emergence of The Islamic State London car bombs; Glasgow Airport attack; foot-and-mouth outbreak (2007); national floods of 2007; child benefit data misplaced; Donorgate; Northern Rock ................................. ....................... nationalisation, Treaty of Lisbon; 42 Days detention; 10p Tax rate; ................................. of 2007–2010; ............................................................. ; arrest of 2007 Damien Green; 2009 flu pandemic; national floods of 2009. 2005 Hong Kong handover; .......................................................; Independence for the Bank of England; Ecclestone tobacco controversy; ...................................; Human 2001 Rights Act; .......................................................; House of Lords Reform,...........................................................; Kosovo War; creation of Greater ................................. ....................... London Authority and Mayoralty of London; ............................;
    [Show full text]
  • Truth to Power: How Civil Service Reform Can Succeed
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) Truth to power: how Civil Service reform can succeed Eighth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral evidence Written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/pasc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 September 2013 HC 74 [incorporating HC 664-i-x,Session 2012–13] Published on 6 September 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £29.40 The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Mr Steve Reed MP (Labour, Croydon North) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2007 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT
    Autumn 2007 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT Imperial College Centenary Dual Funding Clinical Trials Elephant Survival Earth Observation from the Iridium Satellite Constellation, 2013-2030 Science in Parliament Vol 64 No 3 Summer 2007 The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee http://www.scienceinparliament.org.uk SCIENCE IN Science in Parliament has two main objectives: a) to inform the scientific and industrial communities PARLIAMENT of activities within Parliament of a scientific nature The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. and of the progress of relevant legislation; The Committee is an Associate Parliamentary Group b) to keep Members of Parliament abreast of members of both Houses of Parliament and British members of the European Parliament, representatives of scientific affairs. of scientific and technical institutions, industrial organisations and universities. Government’s re- organisation of the DfES and DTI was done with the best of intentions, but had Contents they thought through Autumn 2007 Volume 64 Number 4 the knock-on impact on the existence of Government IT failures – fact or fiction? 1 the Science & Opinion by Andrew Miller MP Technology (S&T) Select Committee? The Linnean Tercentenary in London 2 The new Department The New Royal Institution 3 of Innovation, Baroness Greenfield and Kristen Dodd Universities and Skills (DIUS), with John Falling on DEFRA ears 5 Denham as its Secretary of State, will give a Alan D B Malcolm greater focus on STEM and ensure that the work The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues 6 of our scientists and engineers results in more Professor Sir Bob Hepple new products and better use of the knowledge that they gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Powers of the Prime Minister
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Role and Powers of the Prime Minister Oral Evidence Oral evidence taken on Thursday 7 February 2013 and Thursday 7 March 2013 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 7 February and 7 March 2013 HC 975 -i and -ii Published on 16 May 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £8 .5 0 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [15-05-2013 16:42] Job: 029318 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/029318/029318_o001_th_Corrected transcript HC 975-i.xml Political and Constitutional Reform Committee: Evidence Ev 13 Thursday 7 February 2013 Members present: Mr Graham Allen (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope Tristram Hunt Sheila Gilmore Mrs Eleanor Laing Andrew Griffiths Stephen Williams Fabian Hamilton ________________ Examination of Witness Witness: Professor Robert Hazell CBE, Professor of Government and the Constitution, and Director of the Constitution Unit, School of Public Policy, UCL, gave evidence. Chair: Robert, how are you? particular the size of the Prime Minister’s majority in Professor Hazell: I am very well, thank you. Parliament, the Prime Minister’s standing in his party Chair: Very good to see you and welcome to the and his standing in the country. So the Prime Select Committee. We are looking this morning, with Minister’s power and authority waxes and wanes your guidance and that of Professor Michael Foley, at depending on those political factors. the role and powers of the Prime Minister. This is one of our ongoing inquiries. You do not want to make Q69 Fabian Hamilton: What I am trying to get at is any opening statements, so if you are ready, we will how far has coalition had a positive effect on jump straight into the questions we have for you.
    [Show full text]