DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Covid-19 Weekly Situation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MOH) PUBLIC HEALTHPUBLIC EMERGENCY HEALTH EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATIONS CENTRE (PHEOC) CENTRE (PHEOC) COVID-19 WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT Issue NO: 33 Reporting Period: 12-18 October 2020 (week 42) 36,740 2,655 CUMULATIVE SAMPLES TESTED CUMULATIVE RECOVERIES 2,847 CUMULATIVE CONFIRMED CASES 55 9,152 CUMULATIVE DEATHS CUMULATIVE CONTACTS LISTED FOR FOLLOW UP 1. KEY HIGHLIGHTS A cumulative total of 2,847 cases have been confirmed and 55 deaths have been recorded, with case fatality rate (CFR) of 1.9 percent including 196 imported cases as of 18 October 2020. 1 case is currently isolated in health facilities in the Country; and the National IDU has 99% percent bed occupancy available. 2,655 cases (0 new) have been discharged to date. 135 Health Care Workers have been infected since the beginning of the outbreak, with one death. 9,152cumulative contacts have been registered, of which 8,835 have completed the 14-day quarantine. Currently, 317 contacts are being followed, of these 92.1 percent (n=292) contacts were reached. 722 contacts have converted to cases to date; accounting for 25.3 percent of all confirmed cases. Cumulatively 36,740 laboratory tests have been performed with 7.7 percent positivity rate. There is cumulative total of 1,373 alerts of which 86.5 percent (n=1, 187) have been verified and sampled; Most alerts have come from Central Equatorial State (75.1 percent), Eastern Equatoria State (4.4 percent); Upper Nile State (3.2 percent) and the remaining 17.3 percent are from the other States and Administrative Areas. As of 18 October, 24 Counties (30.0 percent) out of 80 Counties of the ten States of South Sudan are affected (figure 4). 2. BACKGROUND South Sudan confirmed its first COVID-19 case on 5 April 2020. To date 2, 847 cases have been confirmed out of cumulative 36,740 tests performed by the National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) and other decentralized Public Health Laboratories Networks in Nimule, Bor, and Malakal and UN clinics in Juba, with 2,655 recoveries and 55 deaths, yielding the case fatality rate (CFR) of 1.9 percent. Up to 7.2 percent (n=205) confirmed cases were imported. South Sudan is classified as having clusters of transmission in general and community transmission in Juba, the capital city. 3. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SURVEILLANCE Descriptive epidemiology This report includes analysis for 2,847 cases the Public Health Emergency Operation Centre (PHEOC) has line listed as confirmed cumulative cases. There are 2,655 recoveries and 55 deaths with case fatality rate (CFR) of 1.9 percent. Cases detected among South Sudanese nationals accounted for (79 percent) of all cases, whereas (12 percent) are foreigners, and 8 percent unknown. There have been 205 imported cases (9 new) registered to date coming mostly from Kenya (17), Uganda (32), Eretria (4), DRC (2), Somalia (1) and South Sudanese returnees (78), and unknowns (71). Confirmed cases range from 2 months - 90 years of age with an average of 36.6 years. As for gender, 72.9percent of confirmed cases were diagnosed in men, 23.2% in women, and 3.9% unknown. Young men within the 30-39 age groups are the most at risk for COVID-19. Only 21.0 percent (n=602) cases reported symptoms, of which the most frequent have been cough (404) , fever (351) , runny nose (257) , shortness of breath (230), fatigue (227) , headache (203) , sore throat (135), muscle aches (129), and others (226). 1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MOH) As of 18 October 2020, the affected Counties are alphabetically: Abyei (52), Aweil Center (8), Aweil East (5), Baliet (1), Ikotos (5), Juba (2,267), Maban (7), Magwi (3), Malakal (84), Nyirol (26), Rubkona (10), Rumbek North (1), Rumbek Center (22), Rumbek East (1), South Bor (32), Tonj North (1), Torit (40), Twic Warrap (3), Twic East (2),Uror (2),Wau (29), Yambio (7), Yei (23), Yirol West (1), Unknown (10). New and cumulative, age, sex; frequency of symptoms; and geographical distribution of COVID-19 confirmed cases are shown in figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 and table 1 respectively. Figure 1: New and cumulative confirmed COVID cases by notification date as of 18 October 2020 200 3,000 150 2,250 100 1,500 50 750 0 0 5-Jul 7-Jun 4-Oct 5-Apr 6-Sep 2-Aug 9-Aug 26-Jul 12-Jul 19-Jul 3-May 14-Jun 21-Jun 28-Jun 11-Oct 18-Oct 12-Apr 19-Apr 26-Apr 13-Sep 20-Sep 27-Sep 16-Aug 23-Aug 30-Aug 10-May 17-May 24-May 31-May New cases 7-day moving average Cumulative cases Figure 2. Frequency of symptoms among Figure 3. Age and sex distribution of § ‡ 0those reporting100 200 (n=602300 ) 400 500 COVID-19 confirmed cases (n=2 597 ) >70 yrs Cough 404 60-69 yrs Fever 351 50-59 yrs Runny Nose 257 40-49 yrs Shortness of… 230 30-39 yrs Fatigue 227 20-29 Age group yrs Headache 203 10-19 yrs Sore throat 135 Muscle aches 129 0-9 yrs Other 226 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Female §Only 602 cases reported having symptoms. ‡2 597 cases have information regarding sex and age Contact tracing summery As of 18 October 2020, the total number of contacts (old and new) that have been monitored has reached 9, 152. Out of these 96.5 percent (n=8,835) contacts have completed 14-day quarantine period. Currently, 317 contacts are being followed of these 92.1 percent (n=292) contacts were reached. 722 contacts have converted to cases thus far; accounting for 25.3 percent of all confirmed cases. 2 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MOH) Figure 4: Distribution of confirmed COVID-19 cases according to Counties Table 1: Summary of COVID-19 Cases by State as of 18 October 2020 Cases Deaths State New Cumulative New Cumulative Central Equatoria 5 2 291 0 40 Eastern Equatoria 0 47 0 2 Jonglei 0 62 0 1 Lakes 0 25 0 6 NBG 0 13 0 0 Unity 0 10 0 1 Upper Nile 0 92 0 4 Warrap (including Abyei) 0 56 0 0 WBG 0 29 0 0 Western Equatoria 0 7 0 0 Imported 0 205 0 1 Unknown 0 10 0 0 Pending classification 0 0 0 0 Total 5 2 847 0 55 4. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION / RESPONSE INTERVENTIONS 4.1 COORDINATION AND LEADERSHIP Coordination is ongoing in the Country through different architectures at National, States and County levels: National Task Force (NTF) providing high level strategic decisions; the National Steering Committee (NSC) providing both strategic and operational decisions/ guidance; the Technical Working Groups at both National and State levels; and the State Task Forces (STF), as well as County Committees (CC). Ongoing COVID-19 Transitional Roadmap discussions by stakeholders including the NSC and the Inter-Agency Leadership Team for mainstreaming COVID-19 into other response and coordination structures aimed at strengthening incident management system in both the short and long terms for humanitarian and development activities. The South Sudan Guidelines on COVID-19 was issued by Medical Advisory Panel (MAP) of the NTF. The Guides are currently under review by the NSC members and the TWGs, and will be updated accordingly. 4.2 LABORATORY Cumulative 36,740 samples tested as of October 18, 2020. Cumulative 2,847 positive cases confirmed across the country with 7.7% positivity rate. South Sudan’s daily testing average positivity proportions this 1,000 2.00% reporting week is shown in figure 5. The trend line in gray 1.74% 1.76% 1.79% 1.80% shows the average percentage of tests that were positive 500 1.68% 2921.03 1.55%3810.52 4351.61 5181.93 5063.16 1.62%5131.75 1.60%4201.19 1.60% over the last 7 days. The orange bars show the percentage of 0 1.40% tests conducted each day that were positive. The TWG has continued the implementation of the GeneXpert decentralization plan to cover Awiel, and later Daily Total Tests Yirol, Nzara, and Makpondu in Western Equatoria State Daily % Positive (WES). Ongoing review of the recently issued MAP testing strategy Percentage positive tests (7-day moving average) and consensus to have wider discussion on the COVID-19 Algorithm and the use of RDT. Fig 5: Laboratory testing positivity data: 7-day count and moving average, 12-18 Oct 2020 3 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MOH) All suspected EVD samples from Raja County tested negative for Ebola, Marburg, Rift Valley Fever (RVF), and yellow fever. The samples were also tested for an extra CCHF in the UVRI research center in Uganda; while further plan to test for arbovirus. 4.3 SURVEILLANCE Epi-Surveillance and PoE TWGs provided specific language to modify the MAP recommendations document for two Protocols (1&2). Multiple pillars are writing the roadmap to: a) improve generation and reporting of alerts at PoEs, POCs, refugee camps; b) improve overall community surveillance in the States and Administrative Areas; c) expand laboratory testing capacity at the mobile lab in Nimule; d) expand testing at the 10 GeneXpert sites; and e) integrate testing at the 7 of the 16 priority PoEs (excluding Juba International Airport). TWG participated in the WHO-led RDT roundtable with Laboratory TWG and CDC to discuss uptake, deployment, and interpretation of results. Also discussed the operational aspects of RDT implementation, such as human resource, isolation/quarantine stations, and revisions to entry/exit requirements, training to improve lab and documentation /reporting systems.
Recommended publications
  • World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT

    World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT

    1 | P a g e World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT JUNE 2014 By: Bernard D. Togba Jr. Francis Thomas Mogga World Vision South Sudan 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Topic Page List of Tables……………………………………………………………………….………………….. 3 List of Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………… 4 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………..……………… 5 2. Objectives……………………………………………………………………………….…………. 6 3. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………….………. 6 3.1. Sample………………………………………………………………………………………….7 3.2. Data Management & Analysis………………………………………………………………….. 7 3.3. Limitations……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4. Overview of Towns…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.1. Overview of Malakal…………………………………………………………………………… 8 4.2. Overview of Renk………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.3. Overview of Kodok…………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.4. Overview of Lul……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.5. Food Availability……………..…………………………………………………………………. 11 5. Summary Results………………………………………………………………………………………11 5.1. Key Informants……………………..……………………………………………………………..11 5.2. Traders…………………………………………………………………………………………….12 5.2.1. Business & Supply………………………………………………………………………. 13 5.2.2. Payment & Transport…………………………….……………………………………. 17 5.3. Beneficiaries………………………………………………………..…………………………….. 19 5.3.1. IDPs Perception…………………………….……..…………………………………… 19 5.3.2. General Characteristics………………………………………………………………….19 5.3.3. Household Welfare & Vulnerability………………………………..…………………… 19 6. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 World Vision South Sudan 3 | P
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Rural Development, Upper Nile State THE PROJECT FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND SUPPORT FOR URGENT DEVELOPMENT ON SOCIAL ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN MALAKAL TOWN IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FINAL REPORT MAIN TEXT JULY 2014 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO., LTD. EI RECS INTERNATIONAL INC. JR KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. 14-122 The Project for Comprehensive Planning and Support for Urgent Development on Social Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town in the Republic of South Sudan Project Area Malakal Air Port ✈ Outer Ring Road Ring Road Ring Nile River Nile LBT Road-1 M al ak al Ri ve LB r T Po Ro ad- MoPI&RD 3 LBT Road-1 LEGEND: ：Block Boundary ：Road ：River ：Forest ：Grassland ：Idle Land (Sand and Mud) :Shrub Urgnt Development Support Projects ：Water Treatment Plant ：Water Pipe ：Water Public Tab ：Malakal Port ：LBT Road PROJECT LOCATION MAP Final Report The Project for Comprehensive Planning and Support for Urgent Development on Social Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town in the Republic of South Sudan Photographs Present Situation of Socio-Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town 1 Water Treatment Plant of SSUWC Water pipes are detariorated and damaged, (Filter Tank) resulting in high ratio of non-revenue water Malakal Port (Cargo Jetty) Malakal Port (Passenger Jetty) Community Road (Black and Clayey Soil Community roads easily get muddy in rainy called Black Cotton Soil) season. LBT Construction Site (Upper
  • Strengthening Free and Independent Media in South Sudan (I-STREAM) Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Progress Report October 2014-Septem

    Strengthening Free and Independent Media in South Sudan (I-STREAM) Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Progress Report October 2014-Septem

    Strengthening Free and Independent Media in South Sudan (i-STREAM) Award No: AID-668-A-13-00005 Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Progress Report October 2014-September 2015 Prepared for: United States Agency for International Development/South Sudan C/O American Embassy Juba, South Sudan Submitted: October 30, 2015 Prepared by: Deborah Ensor Chief of Party Internews in South Sudan PO Box 425, Plot 48 Block 1 Korok The authors’ views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... I ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... 2 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 B. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS ............................................................................................................. 2 Eye Media ......................................................................................................................................2 THe Radio Community (TRC) ...........................................................................................................3 Training .........................................................................................................................................4 Humanitarian
  • Viable Support to Transition and Stability (Vistas) Fy 2016 Annual Report October1, 2015 - September 30, 2016

    Viable Support to Transition and Stability (Vistas) Fy 2016 Annual Report October1, 2015 - September 30, 2016

    VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) FY 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER1, 2015 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 JUNE 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM. VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) FY 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2015- SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Contract No. AID-668-C-13-00004 Submitted to: USAID South Sudan Prepared by: AECOM International Development Prepared for: Office of Transition and Conflict Mitigation (OTCM) USAID South Sudan Mission American Embassy Juba, South Sudan DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. FY 2016 Annual Report/ Viable Support to Transition and Stability (VISTAS) i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 II. Political and security Landscape ............................................................................................ 2 National Political, Security, and Operational Landscape ........................................................................... 2 Political & Security Landscape in VISTAS Regional Offices ...................................................................... 4 III. Program Strategy.................................................................................................................... 7 IV. Program Highlights
  • Aweil Centre County - Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Factsheet Northern Bahr El Ghazal State, South Sudan November/December2018

    Aweil Centre County - Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Factsheet Northern Bahr El Ghazal State, South Sudan November/December2018

    Aweil Centre County - Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Factsheet Northern Bahr el Ghazal State, South Sudan November/December2018 Overview and Methodology WASH Needs Severity Map The dynamic and multi-faceted nature of the South countrywide WASH baseline in July and August of Sudanese displacement crisis has created significant 2018 during Round 22 of the Food Security and challenges for the delivery of humanitarian aid. Nutrition Monitoring System (FSNMS). FSNMS evel 2 - Stressed Accessibility and security issues within South Sudan partners agreed to once again incorporate WASH evel 3 - Warning have impeded a systematic understanding of WASH cluster indicators for FSNMS Round 23 (November needs in many areas of the country, and have created and December of 2018). FSNMS is a seasonal evel 4 - Alert difficulties in establishing a clear and unambiguous countrywide assessment conducted, funded and run evel 5 - Emergency system for prioritizing the delivery of aid, thereby limiting by the World Food Programme, UNICEF, and the Upper Nile the effectiveness of humanitarian planning and limiting the Food and Agriculture Organization, and supported by Upp er Nile Jongle i potential impact of donor funding. As this crisis continues REACH in Round 22. FSNMS, established in 2010, is Northern Unity to expand, evolve and spill into neighbouring countries, it a representative survey that employs two-stage cluster Western Bahr el has become increasingly important to fill information gaps sampling, using a state based sample size and cluster Bahr el Ghazal Ghazal to inform a more effective humanitarian response and determination. In each county, access permitting, 9 Warrap planning for immediate life-saving WASH activities and clusters were selected and 12 households interviewed contingency planning for durable solutions.
  • The Conflict in Upper Nile State (18 March 2014 Update)

    The Conflict in Upper Nile State (18 March 2014 Update)

    The Conflict in Upper Nile State (18 March 2014 update) Three months have elapsed since widespread conflict broke out in South Sudan, and Malakal, Upper Nile’s state capital, remains deserted and largely burned to the ground. The state is patchwork of zones of control, with the rebels holding the largely Nuer south (Longochuk, Maiwut, Nasir, and Ulang counties), and the government retaining the north (Renk), east (Maban and Melut), and the crucial areas around Upper Nile’s oil fields. The rest of the state is contested. The conflict in Upper Nile began as one between different factions within the SPLA but has now broadened to include the targeted ethnic killing of civilians by both sides. With the status of negotiations in Addis Ababa unclear, and the rebel’s 14 March decision to refuse a regional peacekeeping force, conflict in the state shows no sign of ending in the near future. With the first of the seasonal rains now beginning, humanitarian costs of ongoing conflict are likely to be substantial. Conflict began in Upper Nile on 24 December 2013, after a largely Nuer contingent of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army’s (SPLA) 7th division, under the command of General Gathoth Gatkuoth, declared their loyalty to former vice-president Riek Machar and clashed with government troops in Malakal. Fighting continued for three days. The central market was looted and shops set on fire. Clashes also occurred in Tunja (Panyikang county), Wanding (Nasir county), Ulang (Ulang county), and Kokpiet (Baliet county), as the SPLA’s 7th division fragmented, largely along ethnic lines, and clashed among themselves, and with armed civilians.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Social Assessment Report for Provision of Essential Health Services Project (PEHSP) Public Disclosure Authorized UNICEF South Sudan Public Disclosure Authorized 25 September 2020 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 This is a working document. It has been prepared to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and as part of a submission to the World Bank Group. The text has not been edited to official publication standards and UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this publication do not imply an opinion on legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. 2 Table of Contents LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................5 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Project rationale ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 The PEHSP objectives .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Security risks and mitigation measures ...............................................................................................
  • Bentiu and Malakal Poc Sites’

    Bentiu and Malakal Poc Sites’

    Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) Protection of Civilian (PoC) Sites Transition: Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility March 2021 This Conflict Sensitivity Analysis (CSA) was requested by the Inter-Cluster Coordination Group in October 2020 and examines the conflict sensitivity implications of the transition of UN Protection of Civilian sites in Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State, from sites under the protection of United Nations Mission in South Sudan to camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) under the jurisdiction of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan. The Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility is intended to support conflict-sensitive aid programming in South Sudan. The Facility is funded by the UK, Swiss, Dutch and Canadian donor missions in South Sudan and is implemented by a consortium of NGOs including Saferworld and swisspeace. Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: Malakal and Bentiu PoC sites Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Overview .........................................................................................................................................................
  • Deim Zubier Rapid Displacement Brief Raja County, Western Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan, April 2018

    Deim Zubier Rapid Displacement Brief Raja County, Western Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan, April 2018

    Deim Zubier Rapid Displacement Brief Raja County, Western Bahr el Ghazal, South Sudan, April 2018 Introduction • This outbreak of conflict follows a previous smaller clash between armed actors in Deim Zubier at the end of February, On 5 April, 2018, conflict broke out between armed actors in Deim Zubier in which caused over 800 IDPs to flee from Deim Zubier south to Raja County, Western Bahr el Ghazal (WBeG) displacing people from the Tambura and Nagero Counties in Western Equatoria State, during region. Internally displaced persons (IDPs) travelled to multiple locations which 14 people, many of whom were children, died as a result within WBeG and to neighbouring states and countries (See Map 1). Due of fatigue and exhaustion on the way.1,2 to the rapid onset of the conflict, little is known about the displacement routes or needs of the affected population. To fill this knowledge gap, • Many who remained in Deim Zubier following the most recent REACH carried out sudden onset remote displacement tracking in Wau clash intended to leave but were unable to pay transportation Protection of Civilian (PoC) site to provide an initial overview of population fees. Due to immobility from perceived insecurity, those who movement. From 18 April to 4 May, REACH conducted 4 focus group stayed reportedly had minimal access to food, markets, clean discussions (FGDs), which included participatory mapping exercises in water, education and other basic services. Wau PoC site with 10 male and 19 female IDPs recently displaced from • The loss of seeds from looting, destruction of property and Deim Zubier, totalling 29 participants.
  • Briefing Paper

    Briefing Paper

    BRIEFING PAPER Recommendations for addressing internal displacement and returns in South Sudan INTRODUCTION The study’s findings indicate that POCs provide essen- tial protection for those afraid of being targeted on ethnic Following decades of civil war, a comprehensive peace agree- grounds. This includes IDPs and returning refugees who find ment and the subsequent independence of South Sudan in themselves living in internal displacement once back in the 2011 prompted as many as two million refugees to return to country. Despite the opposition of humanitarian organisations, the world’s youngest country.1 Many, however, were displaced however, the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) again when internal conflict erupted in December 2013. A began to withdraw from the sites in September 2020. temporary reprieve following the signing of a peace agree- ment in 2015 enabled some to return to their homes, but To examine the implications of this withdrawal for the short conflict soon flared up again. and long-term response to internal displacement, IDMC organ- ised an online discussion with partners from the Norwegian A revitalised peace agreement was signed in 2018, but conflict Refugee Council, France’s Agency for Technical Cooperation and violence triggered almost 259,000 new displacements and Development (ACTED) and REACH. the following year.2 A study by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) also found that displaced people Drawing on the outcome of the discussion, this paper calls in South Sudan continue to face barriers in their pursuit of for a comprehensive study of land use to inform discussions durable solutions. Despite the peace agreement, many inter- about return and durable solutions in South Sudan, and nally displaced people (IDPs) and returning refugees remain concerted efforts by all those involved in the response to in Protection of Civilians sites (POCs) because they do not feel promote peaceful coexistence.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Health Systems for Outcomes Publication Outcomes Systems for Health FINANCING IN SOUTHERN SUDAN CARE HEALTH FOR SUSTAINABLE PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIC OPTIONS August 2009 Christine Rogo, Ombaka, Olivia and Lomoro Bengt Herring Amponsah, Kofi Samuel Mills, Wasunna Owino, Khama Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................... V ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... VII 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Health System ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Poor Health Status ................................................................................................................................................ 2 National Health Policy Statement on Health Financing ........................................................................................ 3 CURRENT MACRO
  • Aweil North County Squeac Assessment Report

    Aweil North County Squeac Assessment Report

    AWEIL NORTH COUNTY SQUEAC ASSESSMENT REPORT BY MARCH 22, 2018 Report By: Jacqueline Macharia Acknowledgement This is an expression of gratitude towards the individuals and organizations that effortlessly supported the processes of this noble exercise. The 2017 SQUEAC in Aweil North County would not have been successful without their inputs. • The donor for funding the assessment • The Ministry of Health (MoH), State MoH and the County Health Department for their support and authorizing the assessment process within the community to proceed as planned • The entire Aweil North community for their patience, willingness to give information to the best of their knowledge when called upon and in allowing screening of their children. • Premiere Urgence Internationale (PUI) for providing some inputs used in triangulation being the nutrition partner in Aweil North • Concern worldwide for their inputs in planning for the assessment and mobilizing the community concerning the exercise. Thank you to the staff that went out of their way to assist during some processes for smooth running. i Table of Content Acknowledgement -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i Abbreviations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iv Executive Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v Introduction --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1