DOCSLIB.ORG

A. General Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A. General Information Common Data Set 2020-2021 A. General Information A0 Respondent Information (Not for Publication) Office Of Institutional Research Name: Title: Office: Office Of Institutional Research Mailing Address: 3100 Main Street City/State/Zip/Country: Houston, Texas 77002 / USA Phone: Fax: https://www.hccs.edu/about-hcc/institutional-research/ E-mail Address: Are your responses to the CDS posted for X Yes reference on your institution's Web site? No If yes, please provide the URL of the corresponding Web page: https://www.hccs.edu/about-hcc/institutional-research/ A0A We invite you to indicate if there are items on the CDS for which you cannot use the requested analytic convention, cannot provide data for the cohort requested, whose methodology is unclear, or about which you have questions or comments in general. This information will not be published but will help the publishers further refine CDS items. HCCS fees are different for in-district, out-of-district and out-of-state status. Because the CDS does not permit separate reporting fees are included in the tuition numbers. A1 Address Information Name of College/University: Houston Community College Mailing Address: PO Box 667517 City/State/Zip/Country: Houston, Texas, 77266, US Street Address (if different): 3100 Main Street City/State/Zip/Country: Houston, Texas, 77002, US Main Phone Number: 713-718-2000 WWW Home Page Address: www.hccs.edu Admissions Phone Number: 713-718-8500 Admissions Toll-Free Phone Number: Admissions Office Mailing Address: PO Box 667517, MC 1136 City/State/Zip/Country: Houston, Texas, 77266, US Admissions Fax Number: Admissions E-mail Address: [email protected] If there is a separate URL for your school’s online application, please specify: If you have a mailing address other than the above to which applications should be sent, please provide: A2 Source of institutional control (Check only one): X Public Private (nonprofit) Proprietary A3 Classify your undergraduate institution: X Coeducational college Men's college Women's college A4 Academic year calendar: X Semester If your academic year has changed because of the Quarter COVID-19 pandemic, please indicate as other below. Trimester 4-1-4 Continuous Differs by program (describe): CDS-A Page 1 Common Data Set 2020-2021 Other (describe): A5 Degrees offered by your institution: X Certificate Diploma X Associate X Transfer Associate X Terminal Associate Bachelor's Postbachelor's certificate Master's Post-master's certificate Doctoral degree research/scholarship Doctoral degree – professional practice Doctoral degree -- other A5 Doctoral degree -- other CDS-A Page 2 Common Data Set 2020-2021 B. ENROLLMENT AND PERSISTENCE B1 Institutional Enrollment - Men and Women Provide numbers of students for each of the following categories as of the institution's official fall reporting date or as of October 15, 2020. • Note: Report students formerly designated as “first professional” in the graduate cells. For information on reporting study abroad students please see this link. FULL-TIME PART-TIME Men Women Men Women Undergraduates Degree-seeking, first-time freshmen 1415 1,840 1,086 1,592 Other first-year, degree-seeking 510 732 702 1,262 All other degree-seeking 3,802 5,824 10,892 18,403 Total degree-seeking 5,727 8,396 12,680 21,257 All other undergraduates enrolled in credit courses 7 13 92 157 Total undergraduates 5,734 8,409 12,772 21,414 Graduate Degree-seeking, first-time 0000 All other degree-seeking 0000 All other graduates enrolled in credit courses 0000 Total graduate 0000 Total all students 5,734 8,409 12,772 21,414 Total all undergraduates 48,329 Total all graduate 0 GRAND TOTAL ALL STUDENTS 48,329 B2 Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Category. Provide numbers of undergraduate students for each of the following categories as of the institution’s official fall reporting date or as of October 15, 2020. • Include international students only in the category "Nonresident aliens." • Complete the “Total Undergraduates” column only if you cannot provide data for the first two columns. • Report as your institution reports to IPEDS: persons who are Hispanic should be reported only on the Hispanic line, not under any race, and persons who are non-Hispanic multi-racial should be reported only under "Two or more races." Degree-Seeking Total Degree-Seeking Undergraduates Undergraduates First-Time (include first-time (both degree- and First Year first-year) non-degree-seeking) Nonresident aliens 351 4,302 4,314 Hispanic/Latino 2,431 17,404 17,501 Black or African American, non-Hispanic 1,635 12,883 12,928 White, non-Hispanic 659 6,222 6,291 American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic 66666 Asian, non-Hispanic 624 5,227 5,258 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 54848 Two or more races, non-Hispanic 146 1,054 1,063 Race and/or ethnicity unknown 76 854 860 TOTAL 5,933 48,060 48,329 Persistence B3 Number of degrees awarded by your institution from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. Certificate/diploma 1,400 Associate degrees 5,725 Bachelor's degrees 0 Postbachelor's certificates 0 Master's degrees 0 Post-Master's certificates 0 Doctoral degrees – research/scholarship 0 CDS-A Page 3 Common Data Set 2020-2021 Doctoral degrees – professional practice 0 Doctoral degrees – other 0 B4-B21: Graduation Rates The items in this section correspond to data elements collected by the IPEDS Web-based Data Collection System’s Graduation Rate Survey (GRS). • For complete instructions and definitions of data elements, see the IPEDS GRS Forms and Instructions for the 2020-2021 Survey. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components/9/graduation-rates In the following section for bachelor’s or equivalent programs, please disaggregate the Fall 2013 and Fall 2014 cohorts (formerly CDS B4-B11) into four groups: • Students who received a Federal Pell Grant* • Recipients of a subsidized Stafford Loan who did not receive a Pell Grant • Students who did not receive either a Pell Grant or a subsidized Stafford Loan • Total (all students, regardless of Pell Grant or subsidized loan status) *Students who received both a Federal Pell Grant and a subsidized Stafford Loan should be reported in the "Recipients of a Federal Pell Grant" column. For each graduation rate grid below, the numbers in the first three columns for Questions A-G should sum to the cohort total in the fourth column (formerly CDS B4-B11). For Bachelor’s or Equivalent Programs Please provide data for the Fall 2014 cohort if available. If Fall 2014 cohort data are not available, provide data for the Fall 2013 cohort. Fall 2014 Cohort Recipients of a Students who did Total Recipients of a Subsidized not receive either a Federal Pell Stafford Loan who Pell Grant or a (sum of 3 columns Grant did not receive a subsidized to the left) Pell Grant Stafford Loan A Initial 2014 cohort of first-time, full- time, bachelor's (or equivalent) 0 degree-seeking undergraduate students B Of the initial 2014 cohort, how many did not persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: • Deceased • Permanently Disabled 0 • Armed Forces • Foreign Aid Service of the Federal Government • Official church missions • Report Total Allowable Exclusions C Final 2014 cohort, after adjusting for 00 0 0 allowable exclusions D Of the initial 2014 cohort, how many completed the program in four years 0 or less (by Aug. 31, 2018) E Of the initial 2014 cohort, how many completed the program in more than four years but in five years or less 0 (after Aug. 31, 2018 and by Aug. 31, 2019) F Of the initial 2014 cohort, how many completed the program in more than five years but in six years or less 0 (after Aug. 31, 2019 and by Aug. 31, 2020) G Total graduating within six years (sum 00 0 0 of lines D, E, and F) CDS-A Page 4 Common Data Set 2020-2021 H Six-year graduation rate for 2014 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! cohort (G divided by C) Fall 2013 Cohort Recipients of a Students who did Total Recipients of a Subsidized not receive either a Federal Pell Stafford Loan who Pell Grant or a (sum of 3 columns Grant did not receive a subsidized to the left) Pell Grant Stafford Loan Initial 2013 cohort of first-time, full- time, bachelor's (or equivalent) A 0 degree-seeking undergraduate students Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many did not persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: • Deceased B • Permanently Disabled 0 • Armed Forces • Foreign Aid Service of the Federal Government • Official church missions • Report Total Allowable Exclusions Final 2013 cohort, after adjusting for C 00 0 0 allowable exclusions Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many D completed the program in four years 0 or less (by Aug. 31, 2017) Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many completed the program in more than E four years but in five years or less 0 (after Aug. 31, 2017 and by Aug. 31, 2018) Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many completed the program in more than F five years but in six years or less 0 (after Aug. 31, 2018 and by Aug. 31, 2019) Total graduating within six years (sum G 00 0 0 of lines D, E, and F) Six-year graduation rate for 2013 H #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! cohort (G divided by C) For Two-Year Institutions Please provide data for the 2017 cohort if available. If 2017 cohort data are not available, provide data for the 2016 cohort. 2017 Cohort 2016 Cohort B12 Initial cohort, total of first-time, full-time degree/certificate-seeking students: 3847 B13 Of the initial cohort, how many did not persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: • Death • Permanently Disability • Service in the armed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IPC Accessibility Guide
    2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES ................................................................................................................. 8 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Evolving content ......................................................................................................................... 10 Disclosure ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Structure and content of the IPC Accessibility Guide ...................................................... 11 Content ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 12 Aim and purpose of the Guide ................................................................................................ 12 Key objectives of the Guide ..................................................................................................... 12 Target audience of the Guide ................................................................................................. 12 1 General information
    [Show full text]
  • The HHS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model for Individual and Small Group Markets Under the Affordable Care Act John Kautter,1 Gregory C
    2014: Volume 4, Number 3 A publication of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Information Products & Data Analytics The HHS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model for Individual and Small Group Markets under the Affordable Care Act John Kautter,1 Gregory C. Pope,1 Melvin Ingber,1 Sara Freeman,1 Lindsey Patterson,1 Michael Cohen,2 and Patricia Keenan2 1RTI International 2Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Abstract: Beginning in 2014, individuals and HHS-HCC diagnostic classification, which is the small businesses are able to purchase private health key element of the risk adjustment model. Then insurance through competitive Marketplaces. The the data and methods, results, and evaluation of Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides for a program the risk adjustment model are presented. Fifteen of risk adjustment in the individual and small group separate models are developed. For each age group markets in 2014 as Marketplaces are implemented (adult, child, and infant), a model is developed for and new market reforms take effect. The purpose each cost sharing level (platinum, gold, silver, and of risk adjustment is to lessen or eliminate the bronze metal levels, as well as catastrophic plans). influence of risk selection on the premiums that Evaluation of the risk adjustment models shows plans charge. The risk adjustment methodology good predictive accuracy, both for individuals and includes the risk adjustment model and the risk for groups. Lastly, this article provides examples transfer formula. of how the model output is used to calculate risk This article is the second of three in this scores, which are an input into the risk transfer issue of the Review that describe the Department formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 69/Monday, April 10, 2000
    19188 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 69 / Monday, April 10, 2000 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND timely will be available for public 3. Payment ProvisionsÐFacility-Specific HUMAN SERVICES inspection as they are received, Rate generally beginning approximately 3 II. Update of Payment Rates Under the Health Care Financing Administration weeks after publication of a document, Prospective Payment System for Skilled Nursing Facilities in Room 443±G of the Department's A. Federal Prospective Payment System 42 CFR Parts 411 and 489 office at 200 Independence Avenue, 1. Cost and Services covered by the Federal SW., Washington, DC, on Monday [HCFA±1112±P] Rates through Friday of each week from 8:30 2. Methodology Used for the Calculation of RIN 0938±AJ93 to 5 p.m. (phone: (202) 690±7061). the Federal Rates FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B. Case-Mix Adjustment and Options C. Wage Index Adjustment to Federal Rates Medicare Program; Prospective Dana Burley, (410) 786±4547 or Sheila Payment System and Consolidated D. Updates to the Federal Rates Lambowitz, (410) 786±7605 (for E. Relationship of RUG±III Classification Billing for Skilled Nursing FacilitiesÐ information related to the case-mix Update System to Existing Skilled Nursing classification methodology). Facility Level-of-Care Criteria AGENCY: Health Care Financing John Davis, (410) 786±0008 (for III. Three-Year Transition Period Administration (HCFA), HHS. information related to the Wage IV. The Skilled Nursing Facility Market Index). Basket Index ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Bill Ullman, (410) 786±5667 (for A. Facility-Specific Rate Update Factor information related to consolidated B. Federal Rate Update Factor SUMMARY: This proposed rule sets forth V.
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Suppressive Landscape in the Human Esophageal Squamous Cell
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20019-0 OPEN Immune suppressive landscape in the human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment ✉ Yingxia Zheng 1,2,10 , Zheyi Chen1,10, Yichao Han 3,10, Li Han1,10, Xin Zou4, Bingqian Zhou1, Rui Hu5, Jie Hao4, Shihao Bai4, Haibo Xiao5, Wei Vivian Li6, Alex Bueker7, Yanhui Ma1, Guohua Xie1, Junyao Yang1, ✉ ✉ ✉ Shiyu Chen1, Hecheng Li 3 , Jian Cao 7,8 & Lisong Shen 1,9 1234567890():,; Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, and it relies heavily on the comprehensive understanding of the immune landscape of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we obtain a detailed immune cell atlas of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) at single-cell resolution. Exhausted T and NK cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), alternatively activated macrophages and tolerogenic dendritic cells are dominant in the TME. Transcriptional profiling coupled with T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing reveal lineage con- nections in T cell populations. CD8 T cells show continuous progression from pre-exhausted to exhausted T cells. While exhausted CD4, CD8 T and NK cells are major proliferative cell components in the TME, the crosstalk between macrophages and Tregs contributes to potential immunosuppression in the TME. Our results indicate several immunosuppressive mechanisms that may be simultaneously responsible for the failure of immuno-surveillance. Specific targeting of these immunosuppressive pathways may reactivate anti-tumor immune responses in ESCC. 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2 Institute of Biliary Tract Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Sequencing of Cancer-Associated Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Next Generation Sequencing
    4678 MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 12: 4678-4682, 2015 Targeted sequencing of cancer-associated genes in hepatocellular carcinoma using next generation sequencing JIANGUO LU1*, JIKAI YIN1*, RUI DONG1, TAO YANG1, LIJUAN YUAN1, LI ZANG1, CHENG XU2, BO PENG2, JIANGMAN ZHAO2 and XILIN DU1 1Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038; 2Department of Medicine, Shanghai Zhangjiang Translational Medicine Research Center, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China Received August 4, 2014; Accepted April 20, 2015 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3952 Abstract. Liver cancer is one of the most common causes it is estimated that >600,000 cases of HCC are newly diag- of cancer-associated mortality. Hepatocellular carcinoma nosed each year worldwide, >50% of which are in China (1,2). (HCC) is the major histological subtype among types of Despite advances in diagnosis and multimodality therapies for primary liver cancer. China is an area of high incidence HCC, the prognosis of the disease remains poor, with a 5-year of HCC, and >50% of the cases of HCC worldwide are in overall survival rate of <14% (3). China. At present, the mechanism underlying the develop- The environmental risk factors for HCC include hepa- ment of HCC remains to be fully elucidated, and previous titis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, studies have predominantly focused on HCC in southern food aflatoxin contaminants, alcohol intake and smoking (2). and eastern China, with molecular data of the HCC cases in HBV infection is the dominant global attributable risk factor, Western China remains limited. In the present study, a panel accounting for >80% of the cases of HCC in China (2).
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA TECDOC SERIES Integrated Integrated of Mechanical Components for Fusion to Safety Classification Approach Applications
    IAEA-TECDOC-1851 IAEA-TECDOC-1851 IAEA TECDOC SERIES Integrated Approach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion ApplicationsApproach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Integrated IAEA-TECDOC-1851 Integrated Approach to Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Applications International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna ISBN 978-92-0-105518-7 ISSN 1011–4289 @ INTEGRATED APPROACH TO SAFETY CLASSIFICATION OF MECHANICAL COMPONENTS FOR FUSION APPLICATIONS The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GERMANY PALAU ALBANIA GHANA PANAMA ALGERIA GREECE PAPUA NEW GUINEA ANGOLA GRENADA PARAGUAY ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA GUATEMALA PERU ARGENTINA GUYANA PHILIPPINES ARMENIA HAITI POLAND AUSTRALIA HOLY SEE PORTUGAL AUSTRIA HONDURAS QATAR AZERBAIJAN HUNGARY REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BAHAMAS ICELAND ROMANIA BAHRAIN INDIA BANGLADESH INDONESIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION BARBADOS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RWANDA BELARUS IRAQ SAINT VINCENT AND BELGIUM IRELAND THE GRENADINES BELIZE ISRAEL SAN MARINO BENIN ITALY SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA, PLURINATIONAL JAMAICA SENEGAL STATE OF JAPAN SERBIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JORDAN SEYCHELLES BOTSWANA KAZAKHSTAN SIERRA LEONE BRAZIL KENYA SINGAPORE BRUNEI DARUSSALAM KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SLOVAKIA BULGARIA KUWAIT SLOVENIA BURKINA FASO KYRGYZSTAN SOUTH AFRICA BURUNDI LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SPAIN CAMBODIA REPUBLIC SRI LANKA CAMEROON LATVIA SUDAN CANADA LEBANON SWEDEN CENTRAL AFRICAN LESOTHO SWITZERLAND REPUBLIC LIBERIA CHAD LIBYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Hnrnp K with MAP 1B-LC1 Promotes TGF-Β1-Mediated
    Li et al. BMC Cancer (2019) 19:894 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6119-x RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Interaction of hnRNP K with MAP 1B-LC1 promotes TGF-β1-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition in lung cancer cells Liping Li1,2†, Songxin Yan3†, Hua Zhang1, Min Zhang1, Guofu Huang1* and Miaojuan Chen4* Abstract Backgrounds: Heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are involved in the metastasis-related network. Our previous study demonstrated that hnRNP K is associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 cells. However, the precise molecular mechanism of hnRNP K involved in TGF-β1-induced EMT remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the function and mechanism of hnRNP K interacted with microtubule-associated protein 1B light chain (MAP 1B-LC1) in TGF-β1-induced EMT. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of hnRNP K in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). GST-pull down and immunofluorescence were performed to demonstrate the association between MAP 1B-LC1 and hnRNP K. Immunofluorescence, transwell assay and western blot was used to study the function and mechanism of the interaction of MAP 1B-LC1 with hnRNP K during TGF-β1-induced EMT in A549 cells. Results: hnRNP K were highly expressed in NSCLC, and NSCLC with higher expression of hnRNP K were more frequently rated as high-grade tumors with poor outcome. MAP 1B-LC1 was identified and validated as one of the proteins interacting with hnRNP K. Knockdown of MAP 1B-LC1 repressed E-cadherin downregulation, vimentin upregulation and actin filament remodeling, decreased cell migration and invasion during TGF-β1-induced EMT in A549 cells.
    [Show full text]
  • IPC Classification
    A guide to current Internaonal Paralympic Commiee Classificaons Archery is open to athletes with a physical impairment and classificaon is broken up into three classes: ARW1: spinal cord and cerebral palsy athletes with impairment in all four limbs ARW2: wheelchair users with full arm funcon ARST (standing): athletes who have no impairments in their arms but who have some impairment in their legs. This group also includes amputees, les autres and cerebral palsy standing athletes. Some athletes in the standing group will sit on a high stool for support but will sll have their feet touching the ground. Athlecs uses a system of leers and numbers is used to disnguish between them. A leer F is for field athletes, T represents those who compete on the track, and the number shown refers to their impairment. 11-13: track and field athletes who are visually impaired 20: track and field athletes who are intellectually disabled 31-38: track and field athletes with cerebral palsy 41-46: track and field amputees and les autres T 51-56: wheelchair track athletes F 51-58: wheelchair field athletes Blind athletes compete in class 11 and are permied to run with a sighted guide, while field athletes in the class are allowed the use of acousc signals, for example electronic noises, clapping or voices, if they compete in the 100m, long jump or triple jump. Athletes in classes 42, 43 and 44 must wear a prosthesis while compeng, but this is oponal for classes 45 and 46. Boccia (a bowling game) is open to athletes with cerebral palsy and other severe physical impairments (eg, muscular dystrophy) who compete from a wheelchair, with classificaon split into four classes: BC1 : Athletes may compete with the help of an assistant, who must remain outside the athlete's playing box.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Interrogation of Genetically Simple and Complex Cancers
    FUNCTIONAL INTERROGATION OF GENETICALLY SIMPLE AND COMPLEX CANCERS by Edward R. Kastenhuber A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy New York, NY December, 2018 ___________________ ___________________ Scott W. Lowe Date Dissertation Mentor Copyright ©2018 by Edward Kastenhuber Dedication To my parents, for all their love and support. iii ABSTRACT The rapid expansion of cancer genomics over recent years has provided a valuable catalog of the events that drive malignancy, but functional dissection of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are needed to fully appreciate the roles of cancer-associated genes. Cancer types vary dramatically in genomic complexity, with pediatric cancers tending towards low mutation rates and certain other diseases tending towards hypermutation and highly rearranged genomes. Targeting driving oncogenes for therapy has precedent, particularly in low complexity cancers, and pre-clinical models provide an opportunity to refine such strategies. Treating high complexity tumors remains particularly challenging in part due to intratumoral heterogeneity, presumed to be linked to enhanced adaptability of cancer cell populations. Patterns of evolution supporting intratumoral heterogeneity have been extensively observed, but functional dissection of heterogeneity has been limited. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) is a rare but lethal liver cancer that primarily affects adolescents and young adults. It has been described to harbor only one recurrent genetic event: somatic deletion of a segment of chromosome 19, resulting in DNAJB1-PRKACA gene fusion. Efforts to understand and treat FL-HCC have been confounded by a lack of models that accurately reflect the genetics and biology of the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements
    ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements 2006 – 2007 2 Contents Officers and Officials .................................................................................................................... 5 Chairman’s Report 2007 .............................................................................................................. 7 The Board:..............................................................................................................................................................................7 The Board has focused on driving three key projects: ............................................................................................................7 Financial .................................................................................................................................................................................7 Staff ........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Chief Executive Report 2007 ....................................................................................................... 9 Operations Report 2007 ............................................................................................................ 10 PNZ Staff and Contracted Service Providers ....................................................................................................................... 10 2008 Beijing Paralympic Games .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Norm
    Report Olympic Agenda 2020 Olympic Games: the New Norm Report by the Executive Steering Committee for Olympic Games Delivery PyeongChang, February 2018 Château de Vidy, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland | Tel +41 21 621 6111 | Fax +41 21 621 6216 | www.olympic.org Report Table of contents Part 1: ........................................................................................................................... 3 Olympic Agenda 2020 ................................................................................................. 3 Olympic Games: From six recommendations to implementation ........................................ 3 The New Norm ............................................................................................................. 4 1. Candidature .................................................................................................................. 4 2. Legacy ................................................................................................................... 5 3. 7-year Journey Together ............................................................................................... 6 Measures and Actions – Overview ................................................................................ 6 Financial Impact .......................................................................................................... 10 The Actors and Work Done ....................................................................................... 11 Executive Steering Committee for Olympic Games Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • Latent Fingerprint Identification System Report
    National Criminal Justice Reference Service nCJrs This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. 2 5 1.0 :; IIIP'S 11111 . w ~1113.2 hi, 2.2 ~ pc I:: Ii£ I:i w ...'" u 1.1 "'''" I 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 I. MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU Of STANOARDS-1963-A ,. " Microfilming procedure.s used to create this .fiche comply with ....'.'1 ;. the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official position or policies of the U. S. Depal1m,~nt of Justice. 4-23-82 i . t National Institute of Justice United States Department of Justicle Washington, D. C. 20531 '. , o .. ,- ~~~b-M- ~ II State of New York's ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LATENT FINGERPRINT I IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM REPORT I The search algori'thm described in this report was developed by Mr. Stephen CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Ferris of DCJS with assistance fro~ Mr. Marvin Israel of Arthur Young & Company. BUREAU I Mr. Israel.'s sugge~tions and assistance were invaluable in the formulation and I development of the algorithm. System programming was done by Mr. Michael Wierzbowski of DCJS. Throughout NEW YOltK STATE DIVISION OF IIe' CRHfINAL JUSTICE SERVICES the project, he simplified and corrected the author's logical structures and assisted with the development of both the test programs and production system.
    [Show full text]