IPC Accessibility Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IPC Accessibility Guide 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES ................................................................................................................. 8 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Evolving content ......................................................................................................................... 10 Disclosure ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Structure and content of the IPC Accessibility Guide ...................................................... 11 Content ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 12 Aim and purpose of the Guide ................................................................................................ 12 Key objectives of the Guide ..................................................................................................... 12 Target audience of the Guide ................................................................................................. 12 1 General information and background ............................................................................. 15 1.1 Background information ............................................................................................... 15 1.1.1 Access as a human right ....................................................................................... 15 1.1.2 United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability 15 1.1.3 Inclusion and global impact ................................................................................. 16 1.2 Fundamental Principles for Accessibility ................................................................. 16 1.2.1 Equity .......................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.2 Dignity ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.3 Functionality ............................................................................................................. 17 1.3 Beneficiaries of an accessible and inclusive environment ................................. 17 1.3.1 People who use a wheelchair .............................................................................. 17 1.3.2 People who have reduced mobility ................................................................... 18 1.3.3 People who have a vision impairment .............................................................. 18 1.3.4 People Who Are deaf or hard of hearing ........................................................ 18 1.3.5 People who have a cognitive impairment ....................................................... 18 1.3.6 Other beneficiaries ................................................................................................. 18 1.4 Measurements and conversions ................................................................................ 20 1.5 Key concepts and notions on accessibility.............................................................. 21 1.6 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. 22 2 Quick reference guide .......................................................................................................... 27 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 3 2.1 Key measurement reference table ............................................................................ 27 2.2 Event accessibility checklist ........................................................................................ 35 3 Venues interior elements requirements .......................................................................... 42 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 42 3.2 Doors, doorways, and gates ....................................................................................... 42 3.2.1 Entrances and exits ............................................................................................... 42 3.2.2 Entrance design ...................................................................................................... 42 3.2.3 Clear width ............................................................................................................... 43 3.2.4 Power operated doors .......................................................................................... 45 3.2.5 Non-power-operated doors ............................................................................... 46 3.2.6 Manoeuvring space at doors ............................................................................. 47 3.2.7 Gates and turnstiles .............................................................................................. 47 3.2.8 Manually operated sliding doors ...................................................................... 48 3.3 Floor surfaces .................................................................................................................. 49 3.3.1 Material ..................................................................................................................... 49 3.4 Clear floor space ............................................................................................................ 50 3.4.1 Turning space for wheelchairs ........................................................................... 50 3.4.2 Protruding Objects .................................................................................................. 51 3.5 Reach range, knee and toe clearance ...................................................................... 51 3.5.1 Reach ranges ........................................................................................................... 52 3.5.2 Table and counters ................................................................................................ 54 3.6 Venue accessible seating ............................................................................................ 54 3.6.1 Spectator accessible seating ............................................................................. 55 3.6.2 Sight lines .................................................................................................................. 56 3.6.3 Accessible spaces .................................................................................................. 57 3.7 Emergency provisions ................................................................................................... 58 3.7.1 Emergency evacuation ......................................................................................... 58 3.7.2 Areas of rescue assistance .................................................................................. 58 3.7.3 Alarms ........................................................................................................................ 59 3.7.4 First aid rooms ......................................................................................................... 59 3.7.5 Building evacuation instructions ....................................................................... 59 3.7.6 Other requirements ................................................................................................ 59 3.7.7 Event considerations ............................................................................................. 60 4 All accessible routes ............................................................................................................. 62 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 4 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 62 4.2 Pathways .......................................................................................................................... 62 4.2.1 Pathways rest areas .............................................................................................. 63 4.2.2 Waiting and queuing areas ................................................................................ 64 4.3 Walking surfaces and protruding objects .............................................................. 64 4.3.1 Protruding Objects ................................................................................................. 64 4.3.2 Exterior pavements and features ...................................................................... 66 4.4 Ramp .................................................................................................................................. 67 4.4.1 Slope ........................................................................................................................... 67 4.4.2 Landings .................................................................................................................... 70 4.4.3 Handrails ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Disability Classification System
    CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso.
    [Show full text]
  • Ifds Functional Classification System & Procedures
    IFDS FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM & PROCEDURES MANUAL 2009 - 2012 Effective – 1 January 2009 Originally Published – March 2009 IFDS, C/o ISAF UK Ltd, Ariadne House, Town Quay, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2AQ, GREAT BRITAIN Tel. +44 2380 635111 Fax. +44 2380 635789 Email: [email protected] Web: www.sailing.org/disabled 1 Contents Page Introduction 5 Part A – Functional Classification System Rules for Sailors A1 General Overview and Sailor Evaluation 6 A1.1 Purpose 6 A1.2 Sailing Functions 6 A1.3 Ranking of Functional Limitations 6 A1.4 Eligibility for Competition 6 A1.5 Minimum Disability 7 A2 IFDS Class and Status 8 A2.1 Class 8 A2.2 Class Status 8 A2.3 Master List 10 A3 Classification Procedure 10 A3.0 Classification Administration Fee 10 A3.1 Personal Assistive Devices 10 A3.2 Medical Documentation 11 A3.3 Sailors’ Responsibility for Classification Evaluation 11 A3.4 Sailor Presentation for Classification Evaluation 12 A3.5 Method of Assessment 12 A3.6 Deciding the Class 14 A4 Failure to attend/Non Co-operation/Misrepresentation 16 A4.1 Sailor Failure to Attend Evaluation 16 A4.2 Non Co-operation during Evaluation 16 A4.3 International Misrepresentation of Skills and/or Abilities 17 A4.4 Consequences for Sailor Support Personnel 18 A4.5 Consequences for Teams 18 A5 Specific Rules for Boat Classes 18 A5.1 Paralympic Boat Classes 18 A5.2 Non-Paralympic Boat Classes 19 Part B – Protest and Appeals B1 Protest 20 B1.1 General Principles 20 B1.2 Class Status and Protest Opportunities 21 B1.3 Parties who may submit a Classification Protest
    [Show full text]
  • ADA Day Draft
    Americans With Disabilities Act ADA DAY 7.26.21 What is ADA Day? History The ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) is a civil rights law for people with disabilities that was passed on July 26, 1990. The law prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities, assuring them of equality and equity of opportunity, full community participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency. In enacting the ADA, Congress recognized that physical and mental disabilities do not reduce a person’s right or ability to fully participate in all aspects of society, but that people with physical or mental disabilities are frequently excluded from doing so as a result of prejudice and inaccessibility. With the help of the ADA, 1 in 4 Americans with disabilities is able to participate in their communities and workplaces today. Every July 26th we celebrate the ADA, our fellow individuals with disabilities, and look ahead to the work that is still being done to make a more inclusive, accessible life for those with disabilities. Areas of assistance under the ADA Employment Transportation Public Accommodations President George Bush signing the ADA act on July 26, 1990 Communications and access to state and local government programs and services 01 Overview of Americans with Disabilities Act Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Prohibits private and government employers, employment agencies, and worker’s unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities. This covered all termsof employment, including applications, hiring, firing, promotion, and job training. It is enforced by the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Those who believe they have been discriminated against on the basis of their disability can file a charge to the department citing disability discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA DE PROJETOS Design Management and Technology
    ISSN 19811543 GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA DE PROJETOS Design Management and Technology 2020; 15 (2) - Fluxo Contínuo Uma publicação do Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo Universidade de São Paulo Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos 2020; 15 (2) © Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento Periodicidade Semestral Tiragem Revista eletrônica Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo [IAU-USP] Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400 - Centro 13566-590, São Carlos - SP, Brasil Telefone: +55 16 3373-9311 Fax: +55 16 3373-9310 www.iau.usp.br Ficha Catalográfica Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos / Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. – v. 15, n. 2 (2020) – . – São Carlos: USP, 2020 - Semestral ISSN 1981-1543 1. Processos e tecnologias de projetos – Periódicos. Arquitetura. I. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Apoio Programa de Apoio às Publicações Científicas Periódicas da USP - SiBI USP Bases de Indexação e Divulgação Produção e Assessoria Editorial Marcio Presente Diagramação e laiaute 4-5 EDITORIAL Sheila W. Ornstein, Márcio M. Fabricio SUMÁRIO 6-19 ALTA TECNOLOGIA E REÚSO DE MATERIAIS DESCARTADOS: DESENVOLVIMENTO DE UM PAINEL DECORATIVO PARA A MELHORIA DO DESEMPENHO TÉRMICO EM EDIFICAÇÕES HIGH TECHNOLOGY AND REUSE OF WASTE MATERIALS: DEVELOPING A DECORATIVE PANEL FOR IMPROVEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Roadmap to Web Accessibility in Higher Education 22
    White Paper 201 ROADMAP TO WEB ACCESSIBILITY IN HIGHER5 EDUCATION 2015 Roadmap to Web Accessibility in Higher Education 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 4 WHO IS THIS WHITE PAPER FOR? ............................................................................................................. 4 WEB ACCESSIBILITY – A GROWING CONCERN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION .................................................. 5 WHAT IS WEB ACCESSIBILITY? ........................................................................................................................... 5 A SURGE IN THE DISABLED POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 5 IMPACT OF ACCESSIBILITY LAWS ON UNIVERSITIES .................................................................................................. 6 THE REHABILITATION ACT.................................................................................................................................. 6 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT .............................................................................................................. 6 TYPES OF DISABILITIES .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gauging ADA Compliance in the 21St Century Business Internet: a Pilot Study
    Communications of the IIMA Volume 16 Issue 4 Article 3 2018 Gauging ADA Compliance in the 21st Century Business Internet: A Pilot Study Daniel McDonald Georgia College & State University, [email protected] Tanya Goette Georgia College & State University, [email protected] Hannah Petoia Georgia College & State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima Part of the Management Information Systems Commons Recommended Citation McDonald, Daniel; Goette, Tanya; and Petoia, Hannah (2018) "Gauging ADA Compliance in the 21st Century Business Internet: A Pilot Study," Communications of the IIMA: Vol. 16 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima/vol16/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communications of the IIMA by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gauging ADA Compliance in the 21st Century Business Internet: A Pilot Study ABSTRACT This paper explores issues of accessibility in Web design, including the applicability of various federal statutes such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. A pilot study of six private sector websites is completed to gauge the effectiveness of current accessibility standards as interpreted from the ADA and Section 508. Evaluating these sites shows that even after 25 years, sites still have accessibility issues. Keywords: web accessibility, Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA, web design, accessibility standards, WCAG 2.0, HTML Section 508 checklist INTRODUCTION The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) created a legal incentive for businesses to stop discriminating against people with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility in Web Development Courses: a Case Study
    informatics Article Accessibility in Web Development Courses: A Case Study Mexhid Ferati 1,* and Bahtijar Vogel 2 1 Informatics Department, Linnaeus University, 392 31 Kalmar, Sweden 2 Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 February 2020; Accepted: 13 March 2020; Published: 17 March 2020 Abstract: Web accessibility is becoming a relevant topic with an increased number of people with disabilities and the elderly using the web. Numerous legislations are being passed that require the web to be universally accessible to all people, regardless of their abilities and age. Despite this trend, university curricula still teach traditional web development without addressing accessibility as a topic. To investigate this matter closely, we studied the syllabi of web development courses at one university to evaluate whether the topic of accessibility was taught there. Additionally, we conducted a survey with nineteen students who were enrolled in a web development course, and we interviewed three lecturers from the same university. Our findings suggest that the topic of accessibility is not covered in web development courses, although both students and lecturers think that it should. This generates lack of competence in accessibility. The findings also confirm the finding of previous studies that, among web developers, there is a low familiarity with accessibility guidelines and policies. An interesting finding we uncovered was that gender affects the motivation to learn about accessibility. Females were driven by personal reasons, which we attribute to females having an increased sense of empathy. Finally, our participants were divided in their opinions whether accessibility contributes to usability.
    [Show full text]
  • The HHS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model for Individual and Small Group Markets Under the Affordable Care Act John Kautter,1 Gregory C
    2014: Volume 4, Number 3 A publication of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Information Products & Data Analytics The HHS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model for Individual and Small Group Markets under the Affordable Care Act John Kautter,1 Gregory C. Pope,1 Melvin Ingber,1 Sara Freeman,1 Lindsey Patterson,1 Michael Cohen,2 and Patricia Keenan2 1RTI International 2Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Abstract: Beginning in 2014, individuals and HHS-HCC diagnostic classification, which is the small businesses are able to purchase private health key element of the risk adjustment model. Then insurance through competitive Marketplaces. The the data and methods, results, and evaluation of Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides for a program the risk adjustment model are presented. Fifteen of risk adjustment in the individual and small group separate models are developed. For each age group markets in 2014 as Marketplaces are implemented (adult, child, and infant), a model is developed for and new market reforms take effect. The purpose each cost sharing level (platinum, gold, silver, and of risk adjustment is to lessen or eliminate the bronze metal levels, as well as catastrophic plans). influence of risk selection on the premiums that Evaluation of the risk adjustment models shows plans charge. The risk adjustment methodology good predictive accuracy, both for individuals and includes the risk adjustment model and the risk for groups. Lastly, this article provides examples transfer formula. of how the model output is used to calculate risk This article is the second of three in this scores, which are an input into the risk transfer issue of the Review that describe the Department formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility SIC Code Table
    MSGP 2010 General Permit Appendix C. Facilities and Activities Covered – Mining and Non-mining Permit eligibility is limited to discharges from facilities in the “sectors” of industrial activity summarized in Table C-1. These sector descriptions are based on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes and Industrial Activity Codes. References to “sectors” in this permit (e.g., sector-specific monitoring requirements) refer to these groupings. Table C-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code1 sector/subsector) SECTOR A: TIMBER PRODUCTS A1 2421 General Sawmills and Planing Mills A2 2491 Wood Preserving A3 2411 Log Storage and Handling 2426 Hardwood Dimension and Flooring Mills 2429 Special Product Sawmills, Not Elsewhere Classified 2431-2439 Millwork, Veneer, Plywood, and Structural Wood (see Sector W) (except 2434) A4 2448 Wood Pallets and Skids 2449 Wood Containers, Not Elsewhere Classified 2451, 2452 Wood Buildings and Mobile Homes 2493 Reconstituted Wood Products 2499 Wood Products, Not Elsewhere Classified A5 2441 Nailed and Lock Corner Wood Boxes and Shook SECTOR B: PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS B1 2631 Paperboard Mills 2611 Pulp Mills 2621 Paper Mills B2 2652-2657 Paperboard Containers and Boxes Converted Paper and Paperboard Products, Except Containers 2671-2679 and Boxes SECTOR C: CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS C1 2873-2879 Agricultural Chemicals C2 2812-2819 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals Soaps, Detergents, and Cleaning Preparations;
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 69/Monday, April 10, 2000
    19188 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 69 / Monday, April 10, 2000 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND timely will be available for public 3. Payment ProvisionsÐFacility-Specific HUMAN SERVICES inspection as they are received, Rate generally beginning approximately 3 II. Update of Payment Rates Under the Health Care Financing Administration weeks after publication of a document, Prospective Payment System for Skilled Nursing Facilities in Room 443±G of the Department's A. Federal Prospective Payment System 42 CFR Parts 411 and 489 office at 200 Independence Avenue, 1. Cost and Services covered by the Federal SW., Washington, DC, on Monday [HCFA±1112±P] Rates through Friday of each week from 8:30 2. Methodology Used for the Calculation of RIN 0938±AJ93 to 5 p.m. (phone: (202) 690±7061). the Federal Rates FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B. Case-Mix Adjustment and Options C. Wage Index Adjustment to Federal Rates Medicare Program; Prospective Dana Burley, (410) 786±4547 or Sheila Payment System and Consolidated D. Updates to the Federal Rates Lambowitz, (410) 786±7605 (for E. Relationship of RUG±III Classification Billing for Skilled Nursing FacilitiesÐ information related to the case-mix Update System to Existing Skilled Nursing classification methodology). Facility Level-of-Care Criteria AGENCY: Health Care Financing John Davis, (410) 786±0008 (for III. Three-Year Transition Period Administration (HCFA), HHS. information related to the Wage IV. The Skilled Nursing Facility Market Index). Basket Index ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Bill Ullman, (410) 786±5667 (for A. Facility-Specific Rate Update Factor information related to consolidated B. Federal Rate Update Factor SUMMARY: This proposed rule sets forth V.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
    SELECTION STANDARDS United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance Program The U.S. Olympic Committee supports Paralympic-eligible military veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games and other international sport competitions. Veterans who demonstrate exceptional sport skills and the commitment necessary to pursue elite-level competition are given guidance on securing the training, support, and coaching needed to qualify for Team USA and achieve their Paralympic dreams. Through a partnership between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and the USOC, the VA National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events Office provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans of the Armed Forces training in a Paralympic sport, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. § 322(d) and section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program the VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum VA Monthly Assistance Allowance (VMAA) Standard in his/her respective sport and sport class at a recognized competition. Athletes must have established training and competition plans and are responsible for turning in monthly and/or quarterly forms and reports in order to continue receiving the monthly assistance allowance. Additionally, an athlete must be U.S. citizen OR permanent resident to be eligible. Lastly, in order to be eligible for the VMAA athletes must undergo either national or international classification evaluation (and be found Paralympic sport eligible) within six months of being placed on the allowance pay list.
    [Show full text]
  • Para Cycling Information Sheet About the Sport Classification Explained
    Para cycling information sheet About the sport Para cycling is cycling for people with impairments resulting from a health condition (disability). Para athletes with physical impairments either compete on handcycles, tricycles or bicycles, while those with a visual impairment compete on tandems with a sighted ‘pilot’. Para cycling is divided into track and road events, with seven events in total. Classification explained In Para sport classification provides the structure for fair and equitable competition to ensure that winning is determined by skill, fitness, power, endurance, tactical ability and mental focus – the same factors that account for success in sport for able-bodied athletes. The Para sport classification assessment process identifies the eligibility of each Para athlete’s impairment, and groups them into a sport class according to the degree of activity limitation resulting from their impairment. Classification is sport-specific as an eligible impairment affects a Para athlete’s ability to perform in different sports to a different extent. Each Para sport has a different classification system. Standard Classification in detail Para-Cycling sport classes include: Handcycle sport classes H1 – 5: There are five different sport classes for handcycle racing. The lower numbers indicate a more severe activity limitation. Para athletes competing in the H1 classes have a complete loss of trunk and leg function and limited arm function, e.g. as a result of a spinal cord injury. Para athletes in the H4 class have limited or no leg function, but good trunk and arm function. Para cyclists in sport classes H1 – 4 compete in a reclined position. Para cyclists in the H5 sport class sit on their knees because they are able to use their arms and trunk to accelerate the handcycle.
    [Show full text]