Roadmap for the Baltic Sea Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Winners of the Baltic Assembly Prizes 1994 – 2019 1994 1996 1998
Baltic Assembly Prizes for Literature, the Arts and Science Baltic Innovation Prize Baltic Assembly Medals 6 November 2020 Address by the President of the Baltic Assembly Aadu Must This year the Baltic Assembly, as any contribute to the targeted cooperation of other organisation, has been significantly our states and prosperity of our Baltic affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. region that will be extremely important Despite the difficulties and restrictions to in the years to come. These people meet in person, the traditions of our promote the unity and cooperation of organisation continue but in slightly the Baltic states - we greatly appreciate different format this year. their work. We award the Baltic Assembly Prizes to Unity and cooperation of the Baltic states outstanding people, who have are extremely important for us. We are demonstrated excellence in literature, thankful to all people who feel the same the arts, science and innovation. This way and act in order to bring the countries year’s winners of the Baltic Assembly closer together. The awarding of the Baltic Prizes have used their talent and Assembly Prizes and Medals in Estonia, knowledge to encourage thinking, remind Lithuania and Latvia is our way of saying about the historical milestones of that even though times are tough people are those who hold our nations together Photo by Ieva Ābele (Administration of Parliament of the Republic of Latvia) the Baltic states and make our countries visible in the international arena. Awards and we are grateful for that. We are also have been won in strong competition, as very proud about their achievements. -
UNU CRIS Working Papers
1 | P a g e The author Andrea Cofelice served as Ph.D. Intern at UNU-CRIS in 2011. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Political Science – Comparative and European Politics at the University of Siena. He is also a junior researcher at the Interdepartmental Centre on Human Rights and the Rights of Peoples of the University of Padua. United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies Potterierei 72, 8000 Brugge, BE-Belgium Tel.: +32 50 47 11 00 / Fax.: +32 50 47 13 09 www.cris.unu.edu 2 | P a g e Abstract This paper aims at exploring which factors may promote or inhibit the empowerment of international parliamentary institutions (IPIs). According to the literature (Cutler 2006), an IPI may be defined as an international institution that is a regular forum for multilateral deliberations on an established basis of an either legislative or consultative nature, either attached to an international organization or itself constituting one, in which at least three states or trans-governmental units are represented by parliamentarians, who are either selected by national legislatures in a self-determined manner or popularly elected by electorates of the member states. Their origin dates back to the creation of the Inter- Parliamentary Union (IPU) in 1889, but they mushroomed after the Second World War, especially after 1989-1991 (new regionalism, also known as open regionalism especially in literature on Latin America), and today their presence is established almost everywhere in the world. However, they display sensibly different features in terms of institutional and organizational patterns, rules and procedures, legal status, membership, resources, functions and powers. -
Accessibility of the Baltic Sea Region Past and Future Dynamics Research Report
Accessibility of the Baltic Sea Region Past and future dynamics Research report This report has been written by Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research on the behalf of VASAB Secretariat at Latvian State Regional Development Agency Final Report, November 2018 Authors Tomasz Komornicki, Klaus Spiekermann Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research Lindemannstraße 10 D-44137 Dortmund, Germany 2 Contents Page 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Accessibility potential in the BSR 2006-2016 ........................................................................... 5 2.1 The context of past accessibility changes ........................................................................... 5 2.2 Accessibility potential by road ........................................................................................... 13 2.3 Accessibility potential by rail .............................................................................................. 17 2.4 Accessibility potential by air .............................................................................................. 21 2.5 Accessibility potential, multimodal ..................................................................................... 24 3. Accessibility to opportunities ................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Accessibility to regional centres ....................................................................................... -
16385 Wykaz Punktow Pobran
Wykaz punktów pobrań Diagnostyki Sp. z o.o. w Regionie Zachodniopomorskim ulica nr domu godziny otwarcia telefon miejscowość 7:00 - 11:30 PP - BIAŁOGARD Lindego 21 pobierane do codziennie 784 465 262 Białogard 11:00 pn.8:00 - 10:30 PP - BIAŁOGARD Mickiewicza 6 pozostałe dni codziennie 735 974 687 Białogard 8:00 - 11:00 PP - CZAPLINEK Drahimska 65A 8:00 - 10:00 codziennie 733 343 654 Czaplinek Vita. Laboratorium Marii Skłodowskiej - pn - pt 32 codziennie 94 314 18 48 Darłowo analityczne Curie 7.00 - 10.30 7:30 - 11:30 PP - GRYFICE Niepodległości 82 pobieranie do codziennie 881 960 214 Gryfice 11:00 663 680 844 PP GRYFINO 7:30 - 11:00 Niepodległości 39 (+ na codziennie 91 416 26 95 Gryfino Szpital wezwanie) w. 150 695 133 102 PP GRYFINO 7:00 - 11:00 11-go Listopada 12A 8:00 - 11:00 codziennie 91 416 26 95 Gryfino 11-go Listopada 12A (sobota) w. 150 7:00 - 11:00 (+ na PP - KAMIEŃ codziennie Szpitalna 10 wezwanie) 663 680 617 Kamień Pomorski + sob., niedz. POMORSKI sobota 8:00 - 10:00 PP - KAMIEŃ Kopernika 26 7:00 - 11:00 codziennie 660 747 853 Kamień Pomorski POMORSKI PP KARLINO Szczecińska 3 8:00 - 10:00 pn., śr., pt. 94 347 72 82 Karlino 7:30 - 17:00 PP - KOŁOBRZEG Łopuskiego 52 sobota codziennie 663 685 563 Kołobrzeg 9:00 - 11:00 7:00 - 13:30 663 685 666 PP - KOŁOBRZEG Kolejowa 1 sobota codziennie Kołobrzeg 9:00 - 11:00 663 685 563 PP - KOŁOBRZEG Zapleczna 3F 7:30 - 11:00 codziennie 506 226 443 Kołobrzeg PP - KOŁOBRZEG Szpitalna 2 7:30 - 11:30 codziennie 663 685 563 Kołobrzeg pn - pt 7:00 15:00 przerwa 94 34 88 318 codziennie PP KOSZALIN -
Specyfikacja Istotnych Warunków Zamówienia /Siwz
id5902390 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com ów zamówienia: "Wycena nieruchomoœci bêd¹cych w Zasobie Wùasnoœci Rolnej Skarbu Pañstwa Specyfikacja istotnych warunk êœci objêtej zasiêgiem dziaùania zamawiaj¹cego – ”. w cz Przetarg nr 3 na 2011 r. êpowanie umieszczone w rejestrze pod nr SO/Sz/0160/III/6/2011 Post SPECYFIKACJA ISTOTNYCH WARUNKÓW ZAMÓWIENIA /SIWZ/ 1. Zamawiaj¹cy: Agencja Nieruchomoœci Rolnych Oddziaù Terenowy w Szczecinie ul. Waùy Chrobrego 4 – (wejœcie od ul. Szczerbcowej) 70-502 Szczecin tel. (xx91) 81-44-200, fax. (xx91) 81-44-222, NIP 525-001-09-76 2 Tryb udzielenia zmówienia: . êpowanie bêdzie prowadzone na podstawie Post art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo ówieñ publicz óên. zm. – „PZP”) zam nych (tekst jedn.: Dz. U. z 2010 r. nr 113, poz.759 z p dalej w trybie œci szacunkowej powy¿ej 125 przetargu nieograniczonego o warto .000 euro. 3. Opis przedmiotu zamówienia: ówienia jest wykonanie usùug œci bêd¹cych w 3.1. Przedmiotem zam w zakresie wyceny nieruchomo ùasnoœci Rolnej Skarbu Pañstwa oraz innych nieruchomoœci wskazanyc Zasobie W h przez ANR na ództwa zachodniopomorskiego w czêœci objêtej dziaùaniem zamawiaj¹cego. terenie wojew ówienia we Wspólnym Sùowniku Zamówieñ (CPV) oznaczony jest kodem Przedmiot zam 71319000-7. ówienia jest podzielony na êpuj¹ce êœci, zwane Przedmiot zam nast cz dalej zadaniami êœciowymi: cz êœciowe A – ùug wyceny na ñskiego ùeckiego Zadanie cz wykonanie us terenie powiatu choszcze -
Historia Przedsiębiorstwa Usług Komunalnych Sp. Z O.O. W Gryfinie
Historia Przedsiębiorstwa Usług Komunalnych Sp. z o.o. w Gryfinie (lata 1957-2013) www.puk.gryfino.pl Str. 2 Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Gospodarki Komunalnej (MPGK) (lata 1957-72) Na podstawie art. 1 ust. z 26 października 1957 r. o przedsiębior- stwach paostwowych /Dz.U.R.P. Nr.49 poz. 439/ za zgodą Prezy- dium Wojewódzkiej Rady Narodowej tworzy się Miejskie Przedsię- biorstwo Gospodarki Komunalnej. Zwierzchni nadzór nad przedsię- biorstwem sprawował Minister Gospodarki Komunalnej. Nadzór bezpośredni sprawowała Miejska Rada Narodowa w Gryfinie. Przedsiębiorstwo było odpowiedzialne w głównej mierze za pro- Pierwszym wadzenie urządzeo komunalnych oraz eksploatację budynków dyrektorem mieszkalnych. przedsiębiorstwa Dyrektorzy i zarządy był Bolesław Bolesław Pawlik – Dyrektor (powołany 07.11. 1957 r.) Zbigniew Kozłowski – p.o. Dyrektora Pawlik, powołany (powołany 01.08.1968 r., Bogusław Gnitecki – Dyrektor odwołany 16.02.1970 r.) (powołany 01.09.1959 r.) Zenon Jaworski – Dyrektor 7 listopada 1957 r. (powołany 16.02.1970 r., Edward Czajka – Dyrektor odwołany 30.12.1970 r.) (powołany1 lutego 1960 r., Zbigniew Kozłowski – Zastępca odwołany 30.06.1967 r.) Dyrektora ds. Technicznych Jadwiga Kucharska – Pełnomocnik (powołany 16.02.1970 r., (ustanowiona 02.10.1962 r., odwołany 16.01.1972 r.) odwołana 01.05.1962 r.) Zenon Harasymków – Pełnomocnik Janusz Kucharski – Dyrektor (ustanowiony 06.03.1963 r.) (powołany 01.06.1971 r., odwołany 31.12.1972 r.) Wacław Matyjewicz – Dyrektor Zenon Harasymków – Pełnomocnik (powołany 01.07.1967 r., (powołany 10.07.1971 r., odwołany 01.08.1968 r. ) www.puk.gryfino.pl Str. 3 Powiatowe Przedsiębiorstwo Gospodarki Komunalnej i Mieszkaniowej „Wielobranżowe” w Gryfinie (lata 1972-75) 30.06.1972 r. połączono zakłady budżetowe: Zakład Gospodarki Mieszkaniowej w Gryfi- nie, Zakład Gospodarki Mieszkaniowej w Baniu, Zakład Gospodarki Mieszkaniowej w Widuchowej z MPGK w Gryfinie. -
The Day Holding Hands Changed History Occupation and Annexation of the Baltic States Was Illegal, and Against the Wish of the Respective Nations
The day holding hands changed history occupation and annexation of the Baltic states was illegal, and against the wish of the respective nations. So at 19:00 on 23 August 1989, 50 years after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, church bells sounded in the Bal- tic states. Mourning ribbons decorated the national flags that had been banned a year before. The participants of the Bal- tic Way were addressed by the leaders of the respective national independence movements: the Estonian Rahvarinne, the Lithuanian Sajūdis, and the Popular Front of Latvia. The following words were chanted – ‘laisvė’, ‘svabadus, ‘brīvība’ (freedom). The symbols of Nazi Germany and the Communist regime of the USSR were burnt on large bonfires. The Baltic states demanded the cessation of the half-century long Soviet occupation, col- onisation, russification and communist genocide. The Baltic Way was a significant step to- wards regaining the national independ- ence of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, and a source of inspiration for other region- al independence movements. The live chain was also realised in Kishinev by Ro- manians of the Soviet-occupied Bessara- bia or Moldova, while in January 1990, Ukrainians joined hands on the road from Lviv to Kyiv. Just after the Baltic Way campaign, the Berlin Wall fell, the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia began, and the Ceausescu regime in Romania was overthrown. On 23 August 1989, approximately two doomed to be forcedly incorporated into million people stood hand in hand be- the Soviet Union until 1991. The Soviet Un- Recognising the documents of the Baltic tween Tallinn (Estonia), Rīga (Latvia) ion claimed that the Baltic states joined Way as items of documentary heritage of and Vilnius (Lithuania) in one of the voluntarily. -
NATO, the Baltic States, and Russia a Framework for Enlargement
NATO, the Baltic States, and Russia A Framework for Enlargement Mark Kramer Harvard University February 2002 In 2002, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) will be initiating its second round of enlargement since the end of the Cold War. In the late 1990s, three Central European countries—Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland—were admitted into the alliance. At a summit due to be held in Prague in November 2002, the NATO heads-of-state will likely invite at least two and possibly as many as six or seven additional countries to join. In total, nine former Communist countries have applied for membership. Six of the prospective new members—Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania, and Macedonia—lie outside the former Soviet Union. Of these, only Slovakia and Slovenia are likely to receive invitations. The three other aspiring members of NATO—Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia— normally would stand a good chance of being admitted, but their status has been controversial because they were republics of the Soviet Union until August 1991. Until recently, the Russian government had vehemently objected to the proposed admission of the Baltic states into NATO, and many Western leaders were reluctant to antagonize Moscow. During the past year-and-a-half, however, the extension of NATO membership to the Baltic states in 2002 has become far more plausible. The various parties involved—NATO, the Baltic states, and Russia—have modified their policies in small but significant ways. Progress in forging a new security arrangement in Europe began before the September 2001 terrorist attacks, but the improved climate of U.S.-Russian relations since the attacks has clearly expedited matters. -
Początki W Szczecinie. Pamięci Ryszarda Wołągiewicza (19.06.1933–14.01.1994)
Redaktor Anna B. Kowalska Sekretarz redakcji Bartłomiej Rogalski Członkowie redakcji Krzysztof Kowalski, Dorota Kozłowska, Rafał Makała Rada Naukowa dr hab. prof. UJ Wojciech Blajer, prof. dr hab. Aleksander Bursche, prof. dr hab. Wojciech Dzieduszycki, prof. dr Hauke Jöns, dr hab. prof. UW Joanna Kalaga, dr hab. prof. UG Henryk Machajewski, dr Dmitrij Osipov, dr hab. prof. UWr Tomasz Płonka Recenzenci dr Justyna Baron, dr Eugeniusz Cnotliwy, dr hab. Andrzej Janowski, dr hab. prof. PAN Michał Kara, dr hab. prof. UAM Andrzej Michałowski Tłumaczenie Tomasz Borkowski, Michał Adamczyk Proofreading Agnes Kerrigan Redakcja wydawnicza Barbara Maria Kownacka, Marcelina Lechicka-Dziel Projekt okładki Waldemar Wojciechowski Skład i druk XPRESS Sp. z o.o. Adres redakcji Muzeum Narodowe w Szczecinie 70-561 Szczecin, ul. Staromłyńska 27 tel.: 797 705 229, e-mail: [email protected] www.mzp.muzeum.szczecin.pl Nakład 250 egz. © Muzeum Narodowe w Szczecinie & Authors ISSN 0076-5236 Szczecin 2015 2 SPIS TREŚCI STUDIA I MATERIAŁY Marta Chmiel-Chrzanowska, Michał Adamczyk O śmierci bez przesady. Próba zastosowania podejścia technologicznego w archeologicznych badaniach nad śmiercią ............................................................ 7 On death with no exaggeration. A technological approach to the study of death. Summary ................ 31 Justyna Żychlińska Transformacja ciała ludzkiego jako wyraz świadomości i istnienia duchowości w kulturze łużyckiej .................................................................................................. -
All Clubs Missing Officers 2014-15.Pdf
Run Date: 12/17/2015 8:40:39AM Lions Clubs International Clubs Missing Club Officer for 2014-2015(Only President, Secretary or Treasurer) Undistricted Club Club Name Title (Missing) 27947 MALTA HOST Treasurer 27952 MONACO DOYEN Membershi 30809 NEW CALEDONIA NORTH Membershi 34968 SAN ESTEVAN Membershi 35917 BAHRAIN LC Membershi 35918 PORT VILA Membershi 35918 PORT VILA President 35918 PORT VILA Secretary 35918 PORT VILA Treasurer 41793 MANILA NEW SOCIETY Membershi 43038 MANILA MAYNILA LINGKOD BAYAN Membershi 43193 ST PAULS BAY Membershi 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Membershi 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA President 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Secretary 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Treasurer 47478 DUMBEA Membershi 53760 LIEPAJA Membershi 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Membershi 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES President 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Secretary 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Treasurer 54912 ULAANBAATAR CENTRAL Membershi 55216 MDINA Membershi 55216 MDINA President 55216 MDINA Secretary 55216 MDINA Treasurer 56581 RIFFA Secretary OFF0021 © Copyright 2015, Lions Clubs International, All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 1290 Run Date: 12/17/2015 8:40:39AM Lions Clubs International Clubs Missing Club Officer for 2014-2015(Only President, Secretary or Treasurer) Undistricted Club Club Name Title (Missing) 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Membershi 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA President 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Secretary 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Treasurer 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Membershi 57378 MINSK CENTRAL President 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Secretary 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Treasurer 59850 DONETSK UNIVERSAL -
Region Building and Identity Formation in the Baltic Sea Region
IJIS Volume 3 REGION BUILDING AND IDENTITY FORMATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION ∗ Imke Schäfer Abstract This paper examines the concept of “new region building” in the Baltic Sea region with emphasis on the construction of a collective “Baltic” identity. Possible implications of these processes on Russia as a non-EU member state are discussed. Region building around the Baltic Sea is conceptualised within the framework of social constructivism, and a connection between region building and identity formation is established. Furthermore, an attempt is made to shed light on the way in which a “Baltic identity” is promoted in the region. By means of a short discourse analysis, certain characteristics of the Baltic Sea region are discovered that are promoted as the basis for a regional identity by various regional actors. The impact of these characteristics on relations between Russia, the EU and the other Baltic Sea states are examined and conclusions are drawn in relation to the region building processes in the Baltic Sea area. INTRODUCTION Cooperation in the Baltic Sea region (BSR) has prospered since the independence of the Baltic States in the beginning of the 1990s. Several programmes and initiatives have been established, such as the Northern Dimension initiative (ND), the Council of Baltic Sea States (CBSS) or the Baltic Sea States Subregional Cooperation (BSSSC). The EU actively supports cooperation in this region. In 1997, at the Luxembourg European Council, Finland’s Northern Dimension initiative (ND) was recognized as part of the -
The Three Seas Initiative
Updated April 26, 2021 The Three Seas Initiative The Three Seas Initiative (3SI) is a regional effort in According to EU data, the 3SI region remains less well-off Europe to expand cross-border energy, transportation, and economically compared with the rest of the EU; the 3SI digital infrastructure and boost economic development in countries together comprise just under 30% of EU territory the area between the Adriatic Sea, Baltic Sea, and Black and 22% of its population but account for 10% of the EU’s Sea. Twelve countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the gross domestic product (the EU data predate Brexit and so Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, include the United Kingdom). Infrastructure gaps are Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia), all of which are considered a factor behind regional economic disparities. members of the European Union (EU), participate in the According to EU data, road and rail travel in the 3SI region 3SI (see Figure 1). take, on average, roughly two to four times longer than comparable travel in the rest of the EU. The U.S. government, including some Members of Congress, have indicated strong backing for the 3SI. In Figure 1. Three Seas Initiative November 2020, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution “expressing support of the Three Seas Initiative in its efforts to increase energy independence and infrastructure connectivity thereby strengthening the United States and European national security” (H.Res. 672, 116th Congress). Officials from the Biden Administration and the Trump Administration have expressed diplomatic support for the 3SI, and high-level U.S. officials (including then- President Trump in 2017) have joined its annual summits.