Targetable Alterations in Adult Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Targetable Alterations in Adult Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Supplementary Online Content Lucchesi C, Khalifa E, Laizet Y, et al. Genomic landscape of adult soft-tissue sarcomas: moving toward personalized medicine [published online May 3, 2018] . JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0723 eMethods. eTable 1. Actionable alterations in a series of 584 STS eTable 2. Clinical outcome of STS patients treated with targeted therapies eFigure 1. Proportion of genetic alterations according to genetic class of STS eFigure 2. Distribution of the number of alterations eFigure 3. Lollipop-style mutation diagrams for frequently altered genes eFigure 4. Distribution of actionable alterations in the 10 most frequent histological subtypes of STS eFigure 5. Co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity of genetic alterations in STS eFigure 6. Objective responses to targeted therapies in STS eFigure 7. Design of the MULTISARC study This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS Bioinformatics Analysis Percentage of Sarcoma samples covered by the different NGS assays of AACR Genie The GENIE data guide (referenced in the Material and Methods: http://www.aacr.org/Documents/GENIEDataGuide.pdf) describes the characteristics of NGS assays used in the study. 584 adults Soft tissue Sarcoma have been sequenced with differently-sized NGS assays whose cumulative sample distribution is reported below. It shows that 493 samples (84%, n=584) are covered by the 4 large-panel NGS assays of the MSK and DFCI Institutes, which include from 300 to 451 genes. © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Data mining of the oncoKB data portal Targetable alterations from the oncoKB portal (http://oncokb.org) were selected via a manual process curated and supervised by our Clinical Department. The alterations and their annotations were extracted in a text table containing the gene symbol, the exact or generic alteration details and the oncoKB therapeutic classification. Then the GENIE data tables data_clinical.txt (patient annotation data), data_CNA.txt (copy number), data_fusions.txt (translocations) and data_mutations_extended.txt (snv/indel) (source https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn7844527) were filtered to include only the patient covered by the study and automatically mined for each of the following alteration scenarios: a) Explicit mutations, for which both gene and exact genetic alteration nomenclature was known (e.g. BRAF V600E): the columns <Hugo_Symbol> and <HGVSp_Short> of GENIE data_mutations_extended.txt table was looked for and the exact match of gene and alteration was reported b) Functional mutations, for which the gene was known and but only the mutation type: the columns <Hugo_Symbol> and <Consequence> of GENIE data_mutations_extended.txt table were looked for the code “missense_variant” for oncogenic mutations and the code list "frameshift_variant","frameshift_variant,splice_region_variant" for truncating mutations., "inframe_deletion,splice_region_variant","missense_variant,splice_region_variant","protein _altering_variant","splice_acceptor_variant","splice_acceptor_variant,coding_sequence_vari ant","splice_acceptor_variant,coding_sequence_variant,intron_variant","splice_acceptor_va riant,intron_variant","splice_donor_variant","splice_donor_variant,coding_sequence_varian t","splice_donor_variant,coding_sequence_variant,intron_variant","splice_region_variant,int ron_variant","splice_region_variant,synonymous_variant","start_lost","stop_gained","stop_ gained,protein_altering_variant","stop_gained,splice_region_variant","stop_lost" for inactivating mutations. c) Genomic amplifications (e.g. CDK4 amplifications) and homozygous deletions (e.g. SMARCB1 deletion): the GENIE data_CNA.txt table was looked for couples patient/gene whose CAN value was +2 for “amplifications” or -2 for homozygous deletion. d) Explicit gene fusions (e.g. KIAA1549-BRAF fusion) : the GENIE data_fusions.txt table was looked for matches of gene1 – gene2 as well as gene2-gene1 gene fusions e) Gene fusions with only one partner known (e.g. FGFR2 fusions): the GENIE data_fusions.txt table was looked for matches of gene1 – geneX where geneX was a generic partner When the match was positive a count of 1 was reported for the alteration in the patient. All data analysis have been performed using basic R and Dplyr libraries. © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Table 1: Actionable alterations in a series of 584 STS Supplementary Table 1. Actionable alterations in a series of 584 STS Targetable Genomic sarcomes Complex genomics sarcomas Translocation Other Total Alteration sarcomas - related Standard care biomarker predictive of response to drugs not approved for management of sarcoma patients PDGFRA fusion 1 0 0 1 ALK fusions 0 0 0 0 BRAF mutation (V600D, 0 0 0 0 V660E, V600G, V600K, V600M,V600R) BRCA1 truncating 2 0 0 2 mutations BRCA2 truncating 2 0 0 2 mutations CDK4 amplification 8 0 76 84 KIT mutation 3 0 0 3 MET amplification 4 1 1 6 MET mutation 4 0 0 4 PDGFRA mutation 1 0 0 1 RET fusion 0 0 0 0 TSC1 truncating mutations 1 0 0 1 TSC2 truncating mutations 3 0 0 3 Alterations associated with compelling clinical evidence of predictive value but neither biomarker nor drug are standard of care AKT1 mutation (E17K) 0 0 0 0 ALK mutation (L1196M, 0 0 0 0 L1196Q) ARAF mutation (S214A, 0 0 0 0 S214C) BRAF fusion 0 0 0 0 BRAF mutation (K601E, 0 0 0 0 L597Q, L597R, L597S, L597V) ERBB2 amplification 0 0 0 0 ERBB2 oncogenic 5 1 2 8 mutations © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 ERCC2 truncating 1 1 0 2 mutations ESR1 oncogenic mutations 2 0 0 2 FGFR1 amplification 3 1 3 7 FGFR2 fusion 0 1 0 1 FGFR3 fusion 0 0 0 0 FGFR3 mutation 2 1 0 3 FLT3 mutation 0 0 0 0 (Y572_Y630ins) IDH1 mutation (R132C, 0 0 0 0 R132G, R132H, R132Q, R132S) IDH2 mutation (R140Q, 0 0 0 0 R172G, R172K, R172M, R172S) JAK2 (PCM1-JAK2 Fusion) 0 0 0 0 MAP2K1 oncogenic 0 0 0 0 mutations MDM2 amplification 16 1 84 101 MET mutations 0 0 0 0 (963_D1010splice, 981_1028splice, X1006_splice, X1007_splice, X1008_splice, X1009_splice, X1010_splice, X963_splice, D1010H, D1010N, D1010Y) MTOR mutation (E2014K) 0 0 0 0 NRAS oncogenic mutations 8 0 0 8 NTRK1 fusions 0 0 0 0 NTRK2 fusions 0 0 0 0 NTRK3 fusions 0 0 0 0 PIK3CA oncogenic 10 5 0 15 mutations PTCH1 truncating 1 0 0 1 mutations ROS1 mutation (D2033N) 0 0 0 0 Alterations associated with compelling biological evidence of predictive value but neither biomarker nor drug are standard of care ALK mutation (R1275Q) 0 0 0 0 ATM mutation (N2875K, 0 0 0 0 R3008C) ATM truncating mutation 5 0 0 5 BRAF mutation (D594E, 0 0 0 0 D594N, G466V, G469A, G469V, G596C, L597Q, L597V) © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 BRAF (KIAA1549-BRAF 0 0 0 0 Fusion) CDKN2A truncating 7 0 0 7 mutations EGFR mutations 0 0 0 0 (729_761del, 729_761ins, L858R, 762_823ins, G719A, L861R, S768I) ERBB2 mutations 0 0 0 0 (E770_K831indel, E770_K831ins) ESR1 mutations (D538G, 0 0 0 0 Y537S) EZH2 oncogenic mutations 2 0 0 2 FGFR1 (BCR-FGFR1 Fusion) 0 0 0 0 FGFR3 mutations (G370C, 0 0 0 0 G380R, K650E, K650M, K650N, K650Q, K650R, K650T, R248C, S249C, S371C, Y373C) IDH1 mutations (R132C, 0 0 0 0 R132G, R132H, R132Q, R132S) KRAS oncogenic mutations 4 1 0 5 MTOR mutations (C1483F, 0 0 0 0 F1888L, L2230V, S2215F, T1977K) NF1 truncating mutations 13 1 1 15 PTEN truncating mutations 7 1 0 8 RAF1 mutation (S257L) 0 0 0 0 TSC1 deletions 0 0 0 0 TSC2 deletions 3 0 0 3 PTCH1 deletions 0 0 0 0 KDR (VEFGR2) oncogenic 7 0 1 8 mutations KDR (VEFGR2) 6 0 2 8 amplifications ATM truncating mutations 0 0 0 0 ATM deletions 1 0 0 1 CDKN2A deletions 21 2 3 26 SMARCB1 truncating 0 0 1 1 mutations SMARCB1 deletions 0 1 1 2 MAP2K1 amplifications 0 0 0 0 VHL oncogenic mutations 1 0 0 1 VHL deletions 0 0 0 0 ARAF oncogenic mutations 1 0 0 1 NF2 truncating mutations 3 0 1 4 © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 NF2 deletions 2 1 0 3 FGF3 amplifications 0 0 1 1 FGF4 amplifications 0 0 1 1 PTEN deletions 9 2 0 11 RICTOR amplifications 2 0 2 4 NF1 deletions 4 0 0 4 Targetable mutation 95 11 6 112 counts Targetable copy number 79 9 174 262 alterations Targetable translocation 1 1 0 2 Number of patients (with 131 19 89 239 at least 1 druggable (40%) (13%) (82%) (41%) alteration) © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Table 2: Clinical outcome of STS patients treated with targeted therapies © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Figure 1: Proportion of genetic alterations according to genetic class of STS © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Figure 2: Distribution of the number of alterations © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Figure 3. Lollipop-style mutation diagrams for frequently altered genes © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Figure 4: Incidence of the 20 most frequent targetable alterations in a series of 584 STS. © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 Supplementary Figure 5: Co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity of genetic alterations in STS © 2018 American Medical Association.
Recommended publications
  • Expression of ALK1 and P80 in Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor and Its Mesenchymal Mimics: a Study of 135 Cases Melissa H
    Expression of ALK1 and p80 in Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor and Its Mesenchymal Mimics: A Study of 135 Cases Melissa H. Cessna, M.D., Holly Zhou, M.D., Warren G. Sanger, Ph.D., Sherrie L. Perkins, M.D., Ph.D., Sheryl Tripp, M.T., Diane Pickering, M.S., Clark Daines, M.D., Cheryl M. Coffin, M.D. Department of Pathology, Primary Children’s Medical Center and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (MHC, HZ, SLP, ST, CD, CMC); and Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (WGS, DP) between structural abnormalities involving 2p23 or Abnormalities of chromosome 2p23 with expres- additional copies of 2p23, it supports the concept of sion of ALK1 and p80 occur in both inflammatory ALK involvement in a larger group of neoplasms, myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and anaplastic large some of which have other documented clonal ab- cell lymphoma. This immunohistochemical study normalities. In IMT, immunohistochemistry for investigates whether the ALK family of neoplasms ALK1 and p80 is useful as an indicator of a 2p23 includes fibroblastic–myofibroblastic, myogenic, abnormality, but it must be interpreted in the con- and spindle cell tumors. Formalin-fixed paraffin- text of histologic and other clinicopathologic data if embedded archival tissues from 10 IMTs and 125 used as an adjunct to differential diagnosis. other soft tissue tumors were stained for ALK1 and p80 with standard immunohistochemistry. ALK1 KEY WORDS: ALK gene rearrangements, ALK im- and/or p80 reactivity was observed in a cytoplasmic munohistochemistry, Anaplastic large cell lym- pattern in IMT (4/10; 40%), malignant peripheral phoma, Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Tissue Cytopathology: a Practical Approach Liron Pantanowitz, MD
    4/1/2020 Soft Tissue Cytopathology: A Practical Approach Liron Pantanowitz, MD Department of Pathology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center [email protected] What does the clinician want to know? • Is the lesion of mesenchymal origin or not? • Is it begin or malignant? • If it is malignant: – Is it a small round cell tumor & if so what type? – Is this soft tissue neoplasm of low or high‐grade? Practical diagnostic categories used in soft tissue cytopathology 1 4/1/2020 Practical approach to interpret FNA of soft tissue lesions involves: 1. Predominant cell type present 2. Background pattern recognition Cell Type Stroma • Lipomatous • Myxoid • Spindle cells • Other • Giant cells • Round cells • Epithelioid • Pleomorphic Lipomatous Spindle cell Small round cell Fibrolipoma Leiomyosarcoma Ewing sarcoma Myxoid Epithelioid Pleomorphic Myxoid sarcoma Clear cell sarcoma Pleomorphic sarcoma 2 4/1/2020 CASE #1 • 45yr Man • Thigh mass (fatty) • CNB with TP (DQ stain) DQ Mag 20x ALT –Floret cells 3 4/1/2020 Adipocytic Lesions • Lipoma ‐ most common soft tissue neoplasm • Liposarcoma ‐ most common adult soft tissue sarcoma • Benign features: – Large, univacuolated adipocytes of uniform size – Small, bland nuclei without atypia • Malignant features: – Lipoblasts, pleomorphic giant cells or round cells – Vascular myxoid stroma • Pitfalls: Lipophages & pseudo‐lipoblasts • Fat easily destroyed (oil globules) & lost with preparation Lipoma & Variants . Angiolipoma (prominent vessels) . Myolipoma (smooth muscle) . Angiomyolipoma (vessels + smooth muscle) . Myelolipoma (hematopoietic elements) . Chondroid lipoma (chondromyxoid matrix) . Spindle cell lipoma (CD34+ spindle cells) . Pleomorphic lipoma . Intramuscular lipoma Lipoma 4 4/1/2020 Angiolipoma Myelolipoma Lipoblasts • Typically multivacuolated • Can be monovacuolated • Hyperchromatic nuclei • Irregular (scalloped) nuclei • Nucleoli not typically seen 5 4/1/2020 WD liposarcoma Layfield et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Differentiated Spindle Cell Liposarcoma
    Modern Pathology (2010) 23, 729–736 & 2010 USCAP, Inc. All rights reserved 0893-3952/10 $32.00 729 Well-differentiated spindle cell liposarcoma (‘atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumor’) does not belong to the spectrum of atypical lipomatous tumor but has a close relationship to spindle cell lipoma: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of six cases Thomas Mentzel1, Gabriele Palmedo1 and Cornelius Kuhnen2 1Dermatopathologie, Friedrichshafen, Germany and 2Institute of Pathology, Medical Center, Mu¨nster, Germany Well-differentiated spindle cell liposarcoma represents a rare atypical/low-grade malignant lipogenic neoplasm that has been regarded as a variant of atypical lipomatous tumor. However, well-differentiated spindle cell liposarcoma tends to occur in subcutaneous tissue of the extremities, the trunk, and the head and neck region, contains slightly atypical spindled tumor cells often staining positively for CD34, and lacks an amplification of MDM2 and/or CDK4 in most of the cases analyzed. We studied a series of well-differentiated spindle cell liposarcomas arising in two female and four male patients (age of the patients ranged from 59 to 85 years). The neoplasms arose on the shoulder, the chest wall, the thigh, the lower leg, the back of the hand, and in paratesticular location. The size of the neoplasms ranged from 1.5 to 10 cm (mean: 6.0 cm). All neoplasms were completely excised. The neoplasms were confined to the subcutis in three cases, and in three cases, an infiltration of skeletal muscle was seen. Histologically, the variably cellular neoplasms were composed of atypical lipogenic cells showing variations in size and shape, and spindled tumor cells with slightly enlarged, often hyperchromatic nuclei.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health-Related Quality of Life of Sarcoma Patients and Survivors In
    Cancers 2020, 12 S1 of S7 Supplementary Materials The Health-Related Quality of Life of Sarcoma Patients and Survivors in Germany—Cross-Sectional Results of A Nationwide Observational Study (PROSa) Martin Eichler, Leopold Hentschel, Stephan Richter, Peter Hohenberger, Bernd Kasper, Dimosthenis Andreou, Daniel Pink, Jens Jakob, Susanne Singer, Robert Grützmann, Stephen Fung, Eva Wardelmann, Karin Arndt, Vitali Heidt, Christine Hofbauer, Marius Fried, Verena I. Gaidzik, Karl Verpoort, Marit Ahrens, Jürgen Weitz, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Martin Bornhäuser, Jochen Schmitt, Markus K. Schuler and the PROSa study group Includes Entities We included sarcomas according to the following WHO classification. - Fletcher CDM, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, editors. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. 468 p. (World Health Organization classification of tumours). - Kurman RJ, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, editors. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. 307 p. (World Health Organization classification of tumours). - Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs—Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):106–19. - World Health Organization, Swerdlow SH, International Agency for Research on Cancer, editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: [... reflects the views of a working group that convened for an Editorial and Consensus Conference at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, October 25 - 27, 2007]. 4. ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation-Associated Synovial Sarcoma
    Radiation-Associated Synovial Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of Two Cases Jean-François Egger, M.D., Jean-Michel Coindre, M.D., Jean Benhattar, Ph.D., Philippe Coucke, M.D., Louis Guillou, M.D. University Institute of Pathology (J-FE, JB, LG) and Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital (PC), Lausanne, Switzerland; Bergonié Institute and University of Bordeaux II (J-MC), Bordeaux, France region, or viscera (1, 2). SS bears the t(X;18) (SYT- Development of a soft-tissue sarcoma is an infre- SSX) reciprocal translocation that seems to be spe- quent but well-known long-term complication of cific for this tumor type and can be routinely de- radiotherapy. Malignant fibrous histiocytomas, ex- tected in paraffin-embedded tissue using the traskeletal osteosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, malig- reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction nant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and angiosar- (RT-PCR; 3–6). Radiation-associated sarcomas are comas are most frequently encountered. Radiation- an infrequent but well-known long-term complica- associated synovial sarcomas are exceptional. We tion of radiotherapy (7–16). They occur in about report the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemi- 1/1000 patients who have undergone radiation cal, and molecular features of two radiation- therapy (7–11). Radiation-associated sarcomas are associated synovial sarcomas. One tumor developed defined as sarcomas arising in a previously irradi- in a 42-year-old female 17 years after external irra- ated field after a latency period of Ն2 years (12). diation was given for breast carcinoma; the other They usually show a more aggressive clinical course occurred in a 34-year-old female who was irradiated associated with shortened patient survival as com- at the age of 7 years for a nonneoplastic condition of pared with sporadic sarcomas (9–12, 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Synovial Sarcoma: Recent Discoveries As a Roadmap to New Avenues for Therapy
    Published OnlineFirst January 22, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-1246 REVIEW Synovial Sarcoma: Recent Discoveries as a Roadmap to New Avenues for Therapy Torsten O. Nielsen 1 , Neal M. Poulin 1 , and Marc Ladanyi 2 ABSTRACT Oncogenesis in synovial sarcoma is driven by the chromosomal translocation t(X,18; p11,q11), which generates an in-frame fusion of the SWI/SNF subunit SS18 to the C-terminal repression domains of SSX1 or SSX2. Proteomic studies have identifi ed an integral role of SS18–SSX in the SWI/SNF complex, and provide new evidence for mistargeting of polycomb repression in synovial sarcoma. Two recent in vivo studies are highlighted, providing additional support for the importance of WNT signaling in synovial sarcoma: One used a conditional mouse model in which knock- out of β-catenin prevents tumor formation, and the other used a small-molecule inhibitor of β-catenin in xenograft models. Signifi cance: Synovial sarcoma appears to arise from still poorly characterized immature mesenchymal progenitor cells through the action of its primary oncogenic driver, the SS18–SSX fusion gene, which encodes a multifaceted disruptor of epigenetic control. The effects of SS18–SSX on polycomb-mediated gene repression and SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling have recently come into focus and may offer new insights into the basic function of these processes. A central role for deregulation of WNT–β-catenin sig- naling in synovial sarcoma has also been strengthened by recent in vivo studies. These new insights into the the biology of synovial sarcoma are guiding novel preclinical and clinical studies in this aggressive cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleural Mesothelioma Dilated and the Pulmonary Trunk Was Occluded by a Large Embolus
    Thorax 1993;48:409-410 409 lungs showed fibrosis, subpleural honeycomb Liposarcomatous changes, chronic bronchitis, and foci of bron- chopneumonia. The heart was slightly differentiation in diffuse enlarged (weight 430 g, right ventricle 120 g, left ventricle 230 g). The right side was Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.48.4.409 on 1 April 1993. Downloaded from pleural mesothelioma dilated and the pulmonary trunk was occluded by a large embolus. The left atrium J Krishna, M T Haqqani was occupied by a large myxoid tumour mass measuring 15 x 6 cm attached to a blood clot which extended into the pulmonary veins. The rest of the organs showed no abnor- Abstract malities. A case history is presented of a woman who died eight hours after hospital MICROSCOPICAL APPEARANCES admission with severe breathlessness. At The right pleura was diffusely infiltrated by necropsy the right lung was encased in a the tumour, which showed a sarcomatous thickened pleura with a large tumour. pattern with myxoid change and abundant Histological examination of the tumour typical lipoblasts containing sharply defined showed pleural mesothelioma with cytoplasmic vacuoles indenting hyperchro- liposarcomatous differentiation. The matic nuclei in the right upper lobe. This was lungs showed changes of asbestosis and confirmed on the electron microscope after the asbestos fibre count was significandy the tissue was post fixed in osmium tetraoxide raised. Liposarcomatous differentiation (fig 1). The right upper lobe also showed an in pleural mesothelioma has not been adjacent mesothelioma with an epithelial reported previously. glandular component (fig 2), uniformly nega- tive for carcinoembryonic antigen but (Thorax 1993;48:409-410) strongly positive for epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin.
    [Show full text]
  • About Soft Tissue Sarcoma Overview and Types
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 About Soft Tissue Sarcoma Overview and Types If you've been diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma or are worried about it, you likely have a lot of questions. Learning some basics is a good place to start. ● What Is a Soft Tissue Sarcoma? Research and Statistics See the latest estimates for new cases of soft tissue sarcoma and deaths in the US and what research is currently being done. ● Key Statistics for Soft Tissue Sarcomas ● What's New in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research? What Is a Soft Tissue Sarcoma? Cancer starts when cells start to grow out of control. Cells in nearly any part of the body can become cancer and can spread to other areas. To learn more about how cancers start and spread, see What Is Cancer?1 There are many types of soft tissue tumors, and not all of them are cancerous. Many benign tumors are found in soft tissues. The word benign means they're not cancer. These tumors can't spread to other parts of the body. Some soft tissue tumors behave 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 in ways between a cancer and a non-cancer. These are called intermediate soft tissue tumors. When the word sarcoma is part of the name of a disease, it means the tumor is malignant (cancer).A sarcoma is a type of cancer that starts in tissues like bone or muscle. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are the main types of sarcoma. Soft tissue sarcomas can develop in soft tissues like fat, muscle, nerves, fibrous tissues, blood vessels, or deep skin tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesenchymal) Tissues E
    Bull. Org. mond. San 11974,) 50, 101-110 Bull. Wid Hith Org.j VIII. Tumours of the soft (mesenchymal) tissues E. WEISS 1 This is a classification oftumours offibrous tissue, fat, muscle, blood and lymph vessels, and mast cells, irrespective of the region of the body in which they arise. Tumours offibrous tissue are divided into fibroma, fibrosarcoma (including " canine haemangiopericytoma "), other sarcomas, equine sarcoid, and various tumour-like lesions. The histological appearance of the tamours is described and illustrated with photographs. For the purpose of this classification " soft tis- autonomic nervous system, the paraganglionic struc- sues" are defined as including all nonepithelial tures, and the mesothelial and synovial tissues. extraskeletal tissues of the body with the exception of This classification was developed together with the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, the glia, that of the skin (Part VII, page 79), and in describing the neuroectodermal tissues of the peripheral and some of the tumours reference is made to the skin. HISTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE OF TUMOURS OF THE SOFT (MESENCHYMAL) TISSUES I. TUMOURS OF FIBROUS TISSUE C. RHABDOMYOMA A. FIBROMA D. RHABDOMYOSARCOMA 1. Fibroma durum IV. TUMOURS OF BLOOD AND 2. Fibroma molle LYMPH VESSELS 3. Myxoma (myxofibroma) A. CAVERNOUS HAEMANGIOMA B. FIBROSARCOMA B. MALIGNANT HAEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA (ANGIO- 1. Fibrosarcoma SARCOMA) 2. " Canine haemangiopericytoma" C. GLOMUS TUMOUR C. OTHER SARCOMAS D. LYMPHANGIOMA D. EQUINE SARCOID E. LYMPHANGIOSARCOMA (MALIGNANT LYMPH- E. TUMOUR-LIKE LESIONS ANGIOMA) 1. Cutaneous fibrous polyp F. TUMOUR-LIKE LESIONS 2. Keloid and hyperplastic scar V. MESENCHYMAL TUMOURS OF 3. Calcinosis circumscripta PERIPHERAL NERVES II. TUMOURS OF FAT TISSUE VI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Cytogenetics and Molecular Diagnostics in the Diagnosis of Soft-Tissue Tumors Julia a Bridge
    Modern Pathology (2014) 27, S80–S97 S80 & 2014 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/14 $32.00 The role of cytogenetics and molecular diagnostics in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors Julia A Bridge Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare, comprising o1% of all cancer diagnoses. Yet the diversity of histological subtypes is impressive with 4100 benign and malignant soft-tissue tumor entities defined. Not infrequently, these neoplasms exhibit overlapping clinicopathologic features posing significant challenges in rendering a definitive diagnosis and optimal therapy. Advances in cytogenetic and molecular science have led to the discovery of genetic events in soft- tissue tumors that have not only enriched our understanding of the underlying biology of these neoplasms but have also proven to be powerful diagnostic adjuncts and/or indicators of molecular targeted therapy. In particular, many soft-tissue tumors are characterized by recurrent chromosomal rearrangements that produce specific gene fusions. For pathologists, identification of these fusions as well as other characteristic mutational alterations aids in precise subclassification. This review will address known recurrent or tumor-specific genetic events in soft-tissue tumors and discuss the molecular approaches commonly used in clinical practice to identify them. Emphasis is placed on the role of molecular pathology in the management of soft-tissue tumors. Familiarity with these genetic events
    [Show full text]
  • Incidental Presacral Myelolipoma Resembling the Liposarcoma: a Case Report and Literature Review
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Urology Volume 2016, Article ID 6510930, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6510930 Case Report Incidental Presacral Myelolipoma Resembling the Liposarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Naoto Tokuyama, Hisashi Takeuchi, Isao Kuroda, and Teiichiro Aoyagi Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Teiichiro Aoyagi; [email protected] Received 12 October 2016; Accepted 6 December 2016 Academic Editor: Emanuele Casciani Copyright © 2016 Naoto Tokuyama et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Presacral myelolipomas are rare, benign, asymptomatic tumors composed of mature adipose tissue and hematopoietic elements, but fewer than 50 cases have been reported in the literature. They are usually discovered incidentally during imaging studies and are often misdiagnosed as liposarcoma, which have a malignant nature, because the imaging findings of myelolipoma can be similarto those of liposarcoma. It is challenging to distinguish presacral myelolipomas from other presacral fat-containing tumors without performing a histological examination. We should consider the possibility of a malignant tumor, and imaging-guided biopsy carries a risk of tumor spread along the biopsy tract. Therefore, surgical management might sometimes be required; however, it is not necessary in all cases. We present an incidentally detected case of presacral myelolipoma that was difficult to differentiate from other malignant tumors in a 71-year-old male. 1. Introduction papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation Between DNA Ploidy, Metaphase High-Resolution Comparative Genomic Hybridization Results and Clinical Outcome of Syno
    Balogh et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2011, 6:107 http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/6/1/107 RESEARCH Open Access Correlation between DNA ploidy, metaphase high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization results and clinical outcome of synovial sarcoma Zsófia Balogh1†, Zsuzsanna Szemlaky1†, Miklós Szendrői2, Imre Antal2, Zsuzsanna Pápai3, László Fónyad1, Gergő Papp1, Yi C Changchien1 and Zoltán Sápi1* Abstract Background: Although synovial sarcoma is the 3rd most commonly occurring mesenchymal tumor in young adults, usually with a highly aggressive clinical course; remarkable differences can be seen regarding the clinical outcome. According to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data published in the literature, the simple and complex karyotypes show a correlation between the prognosis and clinical outcome. In addition, the connection between DNA ploidy and clinical course is controversial. The aim of this study was using a fine-tuning interpretation of our DNA ploidy results and to compare these with metaphase high-resolution CGH (HR-CGH) results. Methods: DNA ploidy was determined on Feulgen-stained smears in 56 synovial sarcoma cases by image cytometry; follow up was available in 46 cases (average: 78 months). In 9 cases HR-CGH analysis was also available. Results: 10 cases were found DNA-aneuploid, 46 were DNA-diploid by image cytometry. With fine-tuning of the diploid cases according to the 5c exceeding events (single cell aneuploidy), 33 cases were so called “simple-diploid” (without 5c exceeding events) and 13 cases were “complex-diploid"; containing 5c exceeding events (any number). Aneuploid tumors contained large numbers of genetic alterations with the sum gain of at least 2 chromosomes (A-, B- or C-group) detected by HR-CGH.
    [Show full text]