DOCSLIB.ORG

BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 P.M BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 p.m. EBRPD – Administrative Headquarters 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, California 94605 The following agenda items are listed for Committee consideration. In accordance with the Board Operating Guidelines, no official action of the Board will be taken at this meeting; rather, the Committee’s purpose shall be to review the listed items and to consider developing recommendations to the Board of Directors. A copy of the background materials concerning these agenda items, including any material that may have been submitted less than 72 hours before the meeting, is available for inspection on the District’s website (www. ebparks.org), the Headquarters reception desk, and at the meeting. Public Comment on Agenda Items If you wish to testify on an item on the agenda, please complete a speaker’s form and submit it to the recording secretary. Your name will be called when the item is announced for discussion. Accommodations and Access District facilities and meetings comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If special accommodations are needed for you to participate, please contact the Clerk of the Board at 510-544-2020 as soon as possible, but preferably at least three working days prior to the meeting. AGENDA TIME ITEM STATUS STAFF 12:30 I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION – N/A B. OTHER MATTERS I Doyle/Pfuehler 1. Endowments Update 2. Park Bond Update 3. Other Possible Ballot Measures (transportation, water) 4. Other Matters II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION R Pfuehler 1. H.R. 4208 (Thompson D-CA) and S. 1999 (Cantwell D-WA) – Wildland Fires Act of 2017 B. OTHER MATTERS 1. D.C. Trip Outline I Pfuehler 2. Other Matters III. 2018 LEGISLATIVE AND GOVERNMENTAL R Pfuehler PRIORITIES IV. MEASURE CC UPDATE I Pfuehler/Baldinger V. STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE R Pfuehler/Doyle CONSULTANT CONTRACT VI. ARTICLES VII. OPEN FORUM PUBLIC COMMENT Individuals wishing to address the Committee on a topic not on the agenda may do so by completing a speaker’s form and submitting it to the recording secretary. VII. BOARD COMMENTS (R) Recommendation for Future Board Consideration (I) Information (D) Discussion Legislative Committee Members Future Meetings: Ellen Corbett (Chair); Beverly Lane; Dennis Waespi January 27 July 21 Colin Coffey, Alternate February 24 CANCELLED August 25 Erich Pfuehler, Government Affairs Manager March 17 September 22 April 14 RESCHEDULED October 20 May 19 November 17 POSTPONED June 16 December 6 RESCHEDULED Distribution/Agenda Distribution/Full Packet District: Public: District: Public: Mimi Waluch Norman LaForce Board Members Pat O’Brien Kristina Kelchner Peter Rauch Robert Doyle Dr. George Manross David Zuckermann Afton Crooks AGMs Doug Houston (via-email) Ira Bletz Stana Hearne Erich Pfuehler Bruce Kern (via-email) Connie Swisher Judi Bank Lisa Baldinger Elissa Robinson (via e-mail) Sharon Clay Michael Kelley Jeff Rasmussen Rick Rickard (via-email) Rachel Sater Bruce Beyaert (via e-mail) Tiffany Margulici Peter Umhofer (via-email) Anne Kassebaum Joshua Hugg Steve Castile Sean Dougan Mona Koh Yolande Barial Knight Mark Pearson – Local 2428 Eri Suzuki – Local 2428 Xiaoning Huang – Local 2428 Tyrone Davis – POA Lobby/Receptionist TO: Board Legislative Committee (Chair Ellen Corbett, Dennis Waespi, Colin Coffey) FROM: Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Erich Pfuehler, Government Affairs Manager SUBJECT: Board Legislative Committee Meeting WHEN: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 PM Lunch will be served WHERE: Board Room, Peralta Oaks _______ Items to be discussed: I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION – N/A B. ISSUES 1. Endowments Update The General Manager and Advocate Doug Houston will provide an update to the Committee about discussions with the California Fish and Wildlife Department about endowments as a response to the District sponsored bill SB 1020 (Wieckowski D-Fremont) in 2016. 2. Park Bond Update The General Manager, staff and Advocate Doug Houston will provide an update about the Park Bond (SB 5) and public education efforts. 3. Other Possible Ballot Measures There may be two other measures of interest to the District on the November 2018 ballot. One is primarily water focused and the other is primarily transportation focused. The Water Supply and Water Quality Act of 2018: This “water bond” is being promoted by former Deputy Director of the California Department of Water Resources and longtime Planning and Conservation League Executive Director Jerry Meral. The “water bond” is $8.877 billion with about a quarter of it going toward watershed improvement. As the name would imply, significant portions of the funding go toward safe drinking water, groundwater storage and water conveyance. Within the watershed improvement section, the San Francisco Bay Area Program of the Coastal Conservancy receives a $100 million allocation and the Coastal Conservancy receives an additional $135 million for their overall work. Because the “water bond” has $2.355 billion in “watershed improvement” funding, a number of the folks who favored the park bond initiative (as opposed to SB 5) are tracking this effort closely. The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1): Efforts to repeal portions of this act through a ballot measure have the potential to impact the District. The initiative is being supported by Republican Assemblymember Travis Allen with a nod from California Republican Party Chair Jim Brulte. The initiative seeks to repeal the 12-cent gas tax, 20-cent diesel tax and 1 the increase in annual vehicle registration fees included in SB 1. Proponents believe an initiative to “repeal the gas tax” in November could help turn-out anti-tax voters. Currently, the initiative needs 365,880 signatures to qualify, but circulation efforts have been stymied by a dispute about the initiative’s title. The title Attorney General Xavier Becerra placed on the initiative reads: “Eliminates recently enacted road repair and transportation funding by repealing revenues dedicated for those purposes.” Sacramento Superior Court judge Timothy Frawley ruled in late September the Attorney General’s title was “misleading” and announced he would rewrite it. Attorney General Becerra appealed to the state Court of Appeals saying the judge overstepped his authority. On November 17, the 3rd District Court of Appeals in Sacramento overturned the Superior Court’s decision, noting that state law gives the Attorney General ‘considerable latitude’ in writing ballot titles. Assemblymember Allen’s attorney said he would appeal to the state Supreme Court. Assuming the initiative qualifies, it could have an impact on turnout in the General Election. II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. H.R. 4208 (Thompson D-CA) and S. 1999 (Cantwell D-WA) – Wildland Fires Act of 2017 Representative Mike Thompson and Senator Maria Cantwell introduced companion legislation in response to this year’s significant wildland fire events. The Wildland Fires Act of 2017 will help further the Federal and State firefighting agencies’ “National Cohesive Fire Strategy” by authorizing additional funding for at-risk communities for wildfire and directing Federal agencies to treat their most-at-risk forests to better protect communities and to reestablish natural fire regimes. The bill directs the Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to provide up to $100 million in funding to at-risk communities to plan and prepare for wildfires. The $100 million financial assistance program is for “at-risk communities adjacent to Federal land, including through States,” which limits opportunities in the East Bay. It does, however, set an important precedent. The legislation also establishes a pilot program that directs the Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to treat their top one percent most-at-risk, least-controversial lands over the next 10 years (and in doing so install fuel breaks in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and, outside of the WUI, conduct prescribed fires). Again, this is largely for Federal lands, but the precedent and fact the Rep. Thompson represents a portion of Contra Costa County makes supporting this legislation consistent with the District’s Wildfire Hazard Reduction and Resource Management Plan. Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT B. ISSUES 1. D.C. Trip Outline Staff will provide an outline of the District’s annual work week in Washington D.C. The proposed week is February 11-15, 2018 during the Partnership for the National Trails System’s annual Hike the Hill conference. 2. Other Matters III. 2018 LEGISLATIVE AND GOVERNMENTAL PRIORITIES The Government Affairs Manager will provide a proposed summary of priorities to incorporate into the Government Affairs work plan for 2018. 2 IV. MEASURE CC UPDATE The General Manager and staff will provide an update about the public meetings and conclusion of the Stakeholder Advisory Working Group (SAWG). V. STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE CONSULTANT CONTRACT Strategy Research Institute (SRI), headed by Dr. G. Manross, has been under contract with the District to provide consulting services. The firm has developed research methodologies, managed surveys and provided expert interpretation of results that serve the District well in providing statistically accurate predictions of voter behavior, public interests, preferences and trends directly affecting this agency. During 2017, the District, with the assistance of Dr. Manross, fielded a Measure CC extension support survey,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees
    2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street Washington, DC 20006 +1.202.778.9000 October 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1-2 Introduction 3 House Key Code 4 House Committee on Administration 5 House Committee on Agriculture 6 House Committee on Appropriations 7 House Committee on Armed Services 8 House Committee on the Budget 9 House Committee on Education and the Workforce 10 House Committee on Energy and Commerce 11 House Committee on Ethics 12 House Committee on Financial Services 13 House Committee on Foreign Affairs 14 House Committee on Homeland Security 15 House Committee on the Judiciary 16 House Committee on Natural Resources 17 House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 18 House Committee on Rules 19 House Committee on Science, Space and Technology 20 House Committee on Small Business 21 House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 22 House Committee on Veterans' Affairs 23 House Committee on Ways and Means 24 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 25 © 2012 K&L Gates LLP Page 1 Senate Key Code 26 Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 27 Senate Committee on Appropriations 28 Senate Committee on Armed Services 29 Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs 30 Senate Committee on the Budget 31 Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 32 Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 33 Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works 34 Senate Committee on Finance 35 Senate Committee on Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Stephen Johnson to Governor Schwarzenegger Denying
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 DEC 1 9 2007 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of the State of California State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Governor Schwarzenegger, As I have committed to you in previous correspondence, I am writing to inform you of my decision with respect to the request for a waiver of Federal preemption for motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). As you know, EPA undertook an extensive public notice and comment process with regard to the waiver request. The Agency held two public hearings: one on May 22, 2007 in Washington, D.C. and one in Sacramento, California on May 30, 2007. We heard from over 80 individuals at these hearings and received thousands of written comments during the ensuing public comment process from parties representing a broad set of interests, including state and local governments, public health and environmental organizations, academia, industry and citizens. The Agency also received and considered a substantial amount of technical and scientific material submitted after the close of the comment deadline on June 15, 2007. EPA has considered and granted previous waivers to California for standards covering pollutants that predominantly affect local and regional air quality. In contrast, the current waiver request for greenhouse gases is far different; it presents numerous issues that are distinguishable from all prior waiver requests. Unlike other air pollutants covered by previous waivers, greenhouse gases are fundamentally global in nature. Greenhouse gases contribute to the problem of global climate change, a problem that poses challenges for the entire nation and indeed the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M
    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 84 | Issue 1 Article 21 Fall 10-1-2018 Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M. Gordils Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Chloe M. Gordils, Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech, 84 Brook. L. Rev. (2018). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol84/iss1/21 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech INTRODUCTION Consider that you are the owner of a popular hot dog eatery in Berkeley, California. One day in early August, after a long day of sausage sales, you return home and turn on the news, only to see the face of one of your employees participating in a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.1 The next day, a popular Twitter account releases a photo of your employee, mentioning your restaurant, and calling on you to terminate the employee. You find yourself in a tough position. On one hand, you are in charge of a private entity (the hot dog restaurant), with a reputation and legitimate business interests that could suffer due to your continued employment of a known neo-Nazi. On the other hand, you are a steadfast supporter of free speech, and have serious doubts about allowing a Twitter account to dictate your employee’s right to assert his or her sociopolitical views off the clock, while maintaining a job.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Country Ever to Attempt to Soft Land on Lunar Surface
    # 1 Indian American Weekly: Since 2006 VOL 13 ISSUE 30 ● NEW YORK / DALLAS ● JULY 26 - AUG 01, 2019 ● ENQUIRIES: 646-247-9458 www.theindianpanorama.news Indian Envoy Advocates for Nurturing H-1B Visa India Creates History with successful as Mutually Beneficial Partnership Launch of Chandrayaan-2: 4th Country Ever to attempt to Soft Land on Lunar Surface NEW DELHI /NEW YORK (TIP): Developed by ISRO, the mission On July 22 India created history was launched from the second when India's Geosynchronous launch pad at Satish Dhawan Space Centre on 22 July 2019 Satellite Launch Vehicle GSLV Picture / courtesy ISRO MkIII-M1, successfully launched the 3840 kgChandrayaan-2 spacecraft into an earth orbit. Launch of Ambassador Shringla congratulated Chandrayaan-2 was originally NASSCOM for the reports and emphasized the contribution of Indian IT companies to the scheduled for 14 July 2019 at 21:21 US economy Photo / Courtesy Indian UTC (15 July 2019 2:51 IST) but was Embassy, Washington called off due to a technical snag noticed while filling the cryogenic WASHINGTON (TIP): Pointing out engine of the rocket with helium. that Indian IT industry has been an Developed by the Indian Space important stakeholder in promoting and Research Organisation (ISRO), the supporting stronger bilateral business mission was launched from the relations between the US and India, second launch pad at Satish Dhawan India's Ambassador to the US Harsh Space Centre on 22 July 2019 at 2.43 Vardhan Shringla said that programs PM IST (09:13 UTC) to the Moon. such as the H-1B visa should be nurtured contd on Page 32 as a mutually beneficial partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Más Allá Del Muro: La Retórica Del Partido Republicano En San Diego Durante La Presidencia De Donald J
    Más allá del muro: La Retórica del Partido Republicano en San Diego durante la presidencia de Donald J. Trump Tesis presentada por José Eduardo Múzquiz Loya para obtener el grado de MAESTRO EN ESTUDIOS CULTURALES Tijuana, B. C., México 2020 CONSTANCIA DE APROBACIÓN Director de Tesis: Dr. José Manuel Valenzuela Arce Aprobada por el Jurado Examinador: 1. Dra. Olivia Teresa Ruiz Marrujo, lectora interna 2. Mtro. Armando Vázquez-Ramos, lector externo Dedicatoria Para Margarita, Pepe, Ana Lucía, Fernando y Gargur. Los amo. Agradecimientos: Quiero agradecer al Colegio de la Frontera Norte por la preparación recibida y al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología por el apoyo económico recibido. Las becas CONACYT para estudios de posgrado brindan oportunidades únicas a jóvenes que aspiran convertirse en investigadores por medio de una beca de manutención. Esta clase de programas son la excepción, más que la regla en el mundo y eso es algo muy importante. Ojalá el programa dure mucho tiempo más. I want to thank Anthony Episcopo, and everyone at the Republican Party of San Diego County for your openness, honesty, hospitality, and interest in this research endeavor. Even when we may disagree with the interpretation, this document can provide an outside view on your message and strategy, which can be useful looking forward. Muchas gracias al Dr. José Manuel Valenzuela Arce por su acompañamiento académico y su cálida amistad. También me gustaría agradecer a la Dr. Olivia Teresa Ruiz Marrujo y al Dr. Armando Vázquez-Ramos por su invaluable orientación y comentarios. Gracias a Claudio Carrillo, Marco Palacios y Alejandro Palacios por acompañarme a los eventos del partido.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor Since 1978
    Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor since 1978 California Fair Political Practices Commission • September 2010 Breaking the Bank a report by the California Fair Political Practices Commission September 2010 California Fair Political Practices Commission 428 J Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Cost-per-Vote Chart 8 Primary Election Comparisons 10 1978 Gubernatorial Primary Election 11 1982 Gubernatorial Primary Election 13 1986 Gubernatorial Primary Election 15 1990 Gubernatorial Primary Election 16 1994 Gubernatorial Primary Election 18 1998 Gubernatorial Primary Election 20 2002 Gubernatorial Primary Election 22 2006 Gubernatorial Primary Election 24 2010 Gubernatorial Primary Election 26 Methodology 28 Appendix 29 Executive Summary s candidates prepare for the traditional general election campaign kickoff, it is clear Athat the 2010 campaign will shatter all previous records for political spending. While it is not possible to predict how much money will be spent between now and November 2, it may be useful to compare the levels of spending in this year’s primary campaign with that of previous election cycles. In this report, “Breaking the Bank,” staff of the Fair Political Practices Commission determined the spending of each candidate in every California gubernatorial primary since 1978 and calculated the actual spending per vote cast—in 2010 dollars—as candidates sought their party’s nomination. The conclusion: over time, gubernatorial primary elections have become more costly and fewer people turnout at the polls. But that only scratches the surface of what has happened since 19781. Other highlights of the report include: Since 1998, the rise of the self-funded candidate has dramatically increased the cost of running for governor in California.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Vol
    WHITTIER REPUBLICAN WOMEN FEDERATED The Elephant Heard June 2019 www.wrwf.org Vol. 2019, Issue 6 ***MEETING NOTICE SPEAKER *** 2019 Officers June 6, 2019 6:00pm Cost: $25.00 Judy Van Horn, President Friendly Hills Country Club (562)335-3102 8500 Villa Verde, Whittier, CA [email protected] Olivia Martinez-Thornton Craig Huey is author and publisher of The 1st V.P. Programs Huey Report and Reality Alert news- (310)343-8606 [email protected] letters, and a frequent guest on TV in- cluding Fox. He is also the president of Sharon Stys 2nd V.P. Membership CraigHuey.com, JudgeVoterGuide.com, and Election- (562)619-1770 Forum.org (his popular website that shows more than [email protected] half a million conservatives how to vote their values) as Mary Dutra well as other conservative websites. 3rd V.P. Ways & Means (562)900-3734 He is he author of The Deep State 15 Surprising Dangers [email protected] You Should Know. The definitive guide to what The Deep Kaye Kidwell, Treasurer State is and how to drain the swamp. (562)902-8207 Craig Huey is the only one in the nation who evaluates [email protected] judges between a strict constructionist and a judicial ac- Donell Schneider, Recording tivist. Secty. (562)822-8260 [email protected] Meat Loaf with Tomato Demi Glaze, Garlic Mashed Pota- Grace Christiansen, Corres. Secty toes, Vegetables de Chef. (562)943-6961 [email protected] (OPTIONS: Vegetarian or Fish) Christine Sweinhart Parliamentarian MAKE YOUR RESERVATION TODAY! DON’T FORGET TO (714)965-8818 [email protected] SPECIFY YOUR MEAL CHOICE.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Reps All Formatted
    Representative in Congress 1st Congressional District Lawrence R. Pamela Mike Thompson* Wiesner Elizondo DEM REP GRN Del Norte 5,261 3,657 241 Humboldt 43,081 17,164 3,754 Lake 15,572 7,875 839 Mendocino 25,452 9,180 2,535 Napa 38,329 14,959 1,667 Sonoma 21,990 9,584 1,481 Yolo 39,681 17,551 3,118 District Totals 189,366 79,970 13,635 Percent 67.0% 28.2% 4.8% 2nd Congressional District Mike Johnson Wally Herger* DEM REP Butte 32,750 43,945 Colusa 1,670 4,206 Glenn 2,611 6,586 Shasta 20,857 54,858 Siskiyou 6,387 13,920 Sutter 8,440 20,975 Tehama 6,555 16,123 Trinity 2,324 4,006 Yolo 3,306 5,337 Yuba 5,410 12,163 District Totals 90,310 182,119 Percent 33.1% 66.9% 3rd Congressional District Douglas Arthur Gabe Castillo Dan Lungren Tuma DEM REP LIB Alpine 300 335 34 Amador 5,516 11,212 583 Calaveras 6,861 14,000 967 Sacramento 85,211 148,505 7,520 Solano 2,137 3,686 206 District Totals 100,025 177,738 9,310 Percent 34.8% 62.0% 3.2% 4th Congressional District David I. Winters John T. Doolittle* DEM REP Butte 6,152 10,413 El Dorado 28,468 55,070 Lassen 2,838 8,312 Modoc 1,055 3,237 Nevada 21,682 29,695 10 Representative in Congress 4th Congressional District (cont.) Placer 48,969 97,518 Plumas 3,429 7,253 Sacramento 4,259 9,116 Sierra 591 1,312 District Totals 117,443 221,926 Percent 34.6% 65.4% 5th Congressional District Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodman LOY 2019 Press Release
    Republican National Lawyers Association P.O. Box 18965 • Washington, D.C. 20036 • Phone: (202) 802-0437 • http://www.rnla.org For Immediate Release Contact: Christina Norton November 8, 2019 (202) 802-0437 Lee Goodman Honored as 2019 Republican Lawyer of the Year Washington, D.C. — The Board of Governors of the Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA) has named Lee Goodman of Virginia the 2019 Republican Lawyer of the Year. Mr. Goodman was selected in recognition of his outstanding professional accomplishments and years of tireless dedication in service to the Republican Party. He will be honored at a reception in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, November 13. RNLA President David Warrington said of this year’s honoree: “Lee is a great lawyer dedicated to defending the First Amendment and the rights of all Americans to participate fully and freely in the democratic process of our Republic. Lee led the fight to defend those rights during his tenure as a commissioner and chairman on the Federal Election Commission. He continues to lead this fight as a lawyer in private practice through the clients and cases he takes, writing thought-provoking commentary, and as a public spokesman for the First Amendment. Lee is also a mentor freely giving his time, advice, and encouragement to numerous lawyers. Many lawyers serving at very high levels in this administration were mentored by Lee and continue to seek his advice and guidance. I am proud to call Lee a colleague and even more proud to call him my friend. I can think of no one who is more deserving of the honor of being the Republican National Lawyers Association’s Lawyer of the Year.” RNLA Chair Manny Iglesias agreed: “For decades, Lee Goodman has served as one of the nation’s leading champions of liberty and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election
    Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election By Sundeep Iyer On Election Day, Republicans maintained control of the House of Representatives. While two Congressional races remain undecided as of November 20, it appears that Democrats may have picked up about eight seats during the 2012 election,1 falling well short of the 25 seats Democrats needed to take back control of the House. Before the election, the Brennan Center estimated that redistricting would allow Republicans to maintain long-term control of 11 more seats in the House than they would have under the previous district lines.2 Now that the election is complete, it is worth re-examining the influence of redistricting on the results of the 2012 election. This brief assesses how the new district lines affected the partisan balance of power in the House. The report is the prologue to more extensive analyses, which will examine other aspects of redistricting, including the fairness of the process and its effect on minority representation, among others. Based on our initial analysis of the 2012 election, several important trends emerge: • Redistricting may have changed which party won the election in at least 25 House districts. Because of redistricting, it is likely that the GOP won about six more seats overall in 2012 than they would have under the old district lines. • Where Republicans controlled redistricting, the GOP likely won 11 more seats than they would have under the old district lines, including five seats previously held by Democrats. Democrats also used redistricting to their advantage, but Republicans redrew the lines for four times as many districts as Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rose Report Volume XIII, Issue I, Fall 2009
    The Rose Report Volume XIII, Issue I, Fall 2009 DIRECTOR’S REPORT: DR. RALPH A. ROSSUM It wasn’t that long ago that the only the Rose Institute’s name recognition means available to us at the Rose Insti- and allows us to have a more immediate tute to keep the public informed of our and substantial impact on public policy research programs, public policy con- questions in California. ferences, publications, and personnel was the hard-copy version of the Rose Our blog posts are now also being Report. We continue to publish it semi- pulled into the CMC Alumni Associa- annually, but we now also have many tion’s Linkedin Group. Linkedin is a so- and political history together with bio- other means at our disposal to keep cial networking site that focuses on job graphical information on state legisla- everyone up-to-date. I want briefly to networking for professionals. The CMC tors and constitutional office holders mention several of them alumni form a large Linkedin Group, since 1849. There are currently 107 and our blog posts are now sent to them. documents in the Archive, and we con- The first, of course, is our website avail- We also post all of our blog posts on the tinue to add to it on a regular basis. able at http:/rose.cmc.edu/. While this social networking site Facebook, so that site has existed for some time, it has all of our “fans” on Facebook can also be On October 15 of this year, the Rose recently been extensively redesigned.
    [Show full text]
  • I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(C)(4) Political Advertisements
    I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(c)(4) Political Advertisements By ANDREW C. B YRNES & C ORTLIN H. L ANNIN* Introduction ON JANUARY 21, 2010, the Supreme Court dropped a bomb on American politics. Coinciding with a powerful backlash in corporate boardrooms and among the conservative establishment against Presi- dent Obama and the Democratic Party-controlled Congress, and bol- stered by the media-beloved “tea party” movement, the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission1 transformed the American political landscape. The decision helped Republicans retake both houses of Congress in the 2010 elections and signals a change in the locus of electoral influence from parties and candi- dates, whose donors are disclosed, toward third party organizations, many with undisclosed contributors.2 The expenditure of large amounts of money to impact American elections did not begin with Citizens United.3 Nonetheless, since the * Mr. Byrnes is a partner, and Mr. Lannin is an associate of Covington & Burling, LLP. This Article represents only their personal views and does not necessarily reflect the views of Covington & Burling LLP, or any of its clients, attorneys and affiliates. Thanks to Robert Lenhard and Kevin Shortill for their feedback and guidance, and to Jonathan Chou for first-rate research assistance. 1. Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). 2. Id. at 940 (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (arguing that the ruling distorts BCRA’s regulatory scheme in favor of corporations/unions as opposed to parties); R. SAM G ARRETT, C ONG.
    [Show full text]