DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rose Report Volume XIII, Issue I, Fall 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rose Report Volume XIII, Issue I, Fall 2009 The Rose Report Volume XIII, Issue I, Fall 2009 DIRECTOR’S REPORT: DR. RALPH A. ROSSUM It wasn’t that long ago that the only the Rose Institute’s name recognition means available to us at the Rose Insti- and allows us to have a more immediate tute to keep the public informed of our and substantial impact on public policy research programs, public policy con- questions in California. ferences, publications, and personnel was the hard-copy version of the Rose Our blog posts are now also being Report. We continue to publish it semi- pulled into the CMC Alumni Associa- annually, but we now also have many tion’s Linkedin Group. Linkedin is a so- and political history together with bio- other means at our disposal to keep cial networking site that focuses on job graphical information on state legisla- everyone up-to-date. I want briefly to networking for professionals. The CMC tors and constitutional office holders mention several of them alumni form a large Linkedin Group, since 1849. There are currently 107 and our blog posts are now sent to them. documents in the Archive, and we con- The first, of course, is our website avail- We also post all of our blog posts on the tinue to add to it on a regular basis. able at http:/rose.cmc.edu/. While this social networking site Facebook, so that site has existed for some time, it has all of our “fans” on Facebook can also be On October 15 of this year, the Rose recently been extensively redesigned. kept abreast of our work. Institute held a high-profile and impor- Interested parties will find new links to tant conference entitled: “Redistrict- information about our Board of Gov- We now link through both our college ing, the 2010 Census, and Your Budget: ernors, senior staff, consultants, stu- website and our blog the Miller-Rose In- Changes and Challenges for California dent management team, and student stitute Initiative Database – a database Governments.” Employing webcasting research assistants. It has links to a list recently-posted online by Professor Ken technology for the first time, we were of all press mentions of the Institute Miller, Associate Director of the Rose able to make the conference available and its people, to the highly-respected Institute, that provides information on in real time to those who were unable Kosmont-Rose Institute Cost of Doing all statewide initiatives approved by vot- to attend in person. Business Survey, and the Miller-Rose ers in the United States from 1904 to the Institute Initiative Database (about present and that summarizes case infor- Finally, we even Twitter at “RoseIn- which, more below). Our website links mation on post-election legal challenges stitute”! We used the Twitter account to our blog, our publications, and to on- to those initiatives. It is an extremely for the first time during our recent line copies of past issues of the Rose Re- valuable resource for scholars across redistricting conference to post real- port. I would be remiss without men- the country researching questions about time comments and analysis. We will tioning that it has a link to “Giving to direct democracy in action as well as ju- use it at future conferences and public the Rose Institute”! dicial review of these direct-ballot mea- events; in addition, we will employ it on sures. The database is collaborative in a regular basis to post links and other For the past four years, the Rose In- that it allows researchers to add their materials that are interesting but per- stitute has also maintained a blog: own work to the database (with our re- haps do not merit a complete blog post. http://rosereport.org/. It is used for view): http://initiatives.rosereport.org. larger, substantive posts both highlight- I invite you to employ these means to ing some of our ongoing research proj- We have posted our California Politi- learn about the Rose Institute and our ects and featuring new research that is cal History Archive and Database at work–and, more importantly, to deep- exclusive to the blog. The blog allows us the Claremont College Digital Library: en your understanding of the critical to post information and research in real http://rosereport.org/library. It chron- public policy challenges facing Califor- time without having to wait for printed icles California’s election, redistricting, nia. reports. It contributes significantly to Also in the News: Page 2..... Student Managers’ Report Page 6.......... A Look Back at the Redistricting Conference Page 3..... Kosmont Updates Page 8.......... Rose Institute Students’ Summer Experiences Page 4..... The Rose Report Online Page 10-11... Meet the New Hires Page 5.....The Girard Fellowship Page 12.........Tony Quinn on the 2010 Redistricting www.rosereport.org Page 2 ~Abhi Nemani ’10, Keith McCammon ’10, STUDENT MANAGERS’ REPORT and Emily Forden ’10 The energy in the back room of the Rose Institute these days included Patrick Atwater ’10 and Ian Johnson ’09, among is palpable. We have only been here since 2006, none of us others, the report has subsequently received attention from are old enough to have lived during the redistrictings of the the press and has set a standard for excellence we expect to Heslop and Hardy era, but from what we have heard -- and maintain throughout this cycle. the senior staff rather enjoys reliving it -- we can only hope it felt something like this. Maps coming out of every print- We were particularly pleased to see the level of board and er, hard deadlines around every corner, and even a few late alumni engagement in the conference. Board members nights now and then. As we approach the 2010 Census and Marguerite Leoni and Frank Trippepi spearheaded the ef- the pursuant redistricting, the Rose Institute is already at fort and pushed us to make the conference a reality in a mat- work, churning out high-quality research on all fronts, rang- ter of months, and Christopher Skinnell and Christopher ing from demographic and fiscal analysis to legal and survey Townsend were just some of our alumni on the panels and research. We can say in attendance. As expect- without equivocation ed, the commentary pro- this has been our most vided by the Institute’s exciting year at the Rose staff -- including Dr. Institute. And it’s just Ralph Rossum, Dr. Flor- getting started. ence Adams, Dr. Kenneth Miller, Doug Johnson, Most recently, the entire and even Patrick Atwater staff came together to ’10 -- was well-received host “Redistricting, The and so continue our tra- 2010 Census, and Your dition of leadership on is- Budget,” a day long con- sues of demographics and ference that prepared redistricting. city leaders for the poli- tics of the turn of the de- None of this could have cade. Over 75 state and happened without the local officials came to immeasurable dedica- Claremont McKenna’s Abhi M. Nemani Emily A. Forden Keith R. McCammon tion and amazing work of campus on October 15, Student Manager Assistant Student Manager Student Manager our students. Conference and with over a dozen manager Sophia Hall panelists and speakers, we packed the Bauer Forum. The day ’10 and assistant manager Emily McNab ’11 planned out consisted of four panels and a lunch keynote, each taking up each detail so meticulously that in the days leading up to a different aspect of the next redistricting: California’s new the event, the senior staff were surprised that they had so rules for redistricting, what to expect in the 2011 redistrict- little to do. Each student stepped up, too: some willing to ing cycle, the 2010 Census Count, the financial opportunities wake up at 7:30am to set up the registration table and oth- of the 2010 Census, and the California Voting Rights Act. ers willing to drive speakers back to the airport at 9pm at The event gave us the opportunity to showcase our own ex- night. This was group effort and, now we think we can say, pertise while bringing together other experts in the field. a group success. We began the day with a preview of our new study, “The Cen- The conference could have easily subsumed the all of the sus 2010: Congressional Reapportionment,” which exam- Institute’s resources, but it is a testament to our staff that ined the most recent population estimates and demographic we did not shrink from our commitment to fiscal, survey, changes in California and their impact on Congressional and legal analysis. In fact this semester, we have expanded redistricting in 2011 (see more on page 6). Produced by a it, with new, challenging projects across the spectrum. research team that was led by Consultant Doug Johnson and www.rosereport.org Page 3 Alongside Dr. Steve Frates, Ilan Wurman ’10 led a team of With the publication of Dr. Miller’s new book, Direct De- researchers examining Riverside County. The final prod- mocracy and the Courts, the Miller-Rose Institute Initia- uct was over 300 pages, and included over 150 charts and tive Database has gained traction in academic circles, and graphs. The report was so big that the team was embarrassed Jacinth Sohi ’11 is working with a group of researchers on to admit that it took them over 2 hours to successfully bind ways to expand the database and leverage it for new analy- it. We’re told by Dr. Frates and Mr. Dave Huntoon, however, sis and papers. Already it has assisted Dr. Miller in his aca- the depth and breadth of the analysis impressed the clients. demic writing and a few students in their classes, and we’re expecting its value to only grow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees
    2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street Washington, DC 20006 +1.202.778.9000 October 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1-2 Introduction 3 House Key Code 4 House Committee on Administration 5 House Committee on Agriculture 6 House Committee on Appropriations 7 House Committee on Armed Services 8 House Committee on the Budget 9 House Committee on Education and the Workforce 10 House Committee on Energy and Commerce 11 House Committee on Ethics 12 House Committee on Financial Services 13 House Committee on Foreign Affairs 14 House Committee on Homeland Security 15 House Committee on the Judiciary 16 House Committee on Natural Resources 17 House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 18 House Committee on Rules 19 House Committee on Science, Space and Technology 20 House Committee on Small Business 21 House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 22 House Committee on Veterans' Affairs 23 House Committee on Ways and Means 24 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 25 © 2012 K&L Gates LLP Page 1 Senate Key Code 26 Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 27 Senate Committee on Appropriations 28 Senate Committee on Armed Services 29 Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs 30 Senate Committee on the Budget 31 Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 32 Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 33 Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works 34 Senate Committee on Finance 35 Senate Committee on Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Stephen Johnson to Governor Schwarzenegger Denying
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 DEC 1 9 2007 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of the State of California State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Governor Schwarzenegger, As I have committed to you in previous correspondence, I am writing to inform you of my decision with respect to the request for a waiver of Federal preemption for motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). As you know, EPA undertook an extensive public notice and comment process with regard to the waiver request. The Agency held two public hearings: one on May 22, 2007 in Washington, D.C. and one in Sacramento, California on May 30, 2007. We heard from over 80 individuals at these hearings and received thousands of written comments during the ensuing public comment process from parties representing a broad set of interests, including state and local governments, public health and environmental organizations, academia, industry and citizens. The Agency also received and considered a substantial amount of technical and scientific material submitted after the close of the comment deadline on June 15, 2007. EPA has considered and granted previous waivers to California for standards covering pollutants that predominantly affect local and regional air quality. In contrast, the current waiver request for greenhouse gases is far different; it presents numerous issues that are distinguishable from all prior waiver requests. Unlike other air pollutants covered by previous waivers, greenhouse gases are fundamentally global in nature. Greenhouse gases contribute to the problem of global climate change, a problem that poses challenges for the entire nation and indeed the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor Since 1978
    Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor since 1978 California Fair Political Practices Commission • September 2010 Breaking the Bank a report by the California Fair Political Practices Commission September 2010 California Fair Political Practices Commission 428 J Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Cost-per-Vote Chart 8 Primary Election Comparisons 10 1978 Gubernatorial Primary Election 11 1982 Gubernatorial Primary Election 13 1986 Gubernatorial Primary Election 15 1990 Gubernatorial Primary Election 16 1994 Gubernatorial Primary Election 18 1998 Gubernatorial Primary Election 20 2002 Gubernatorial Primary Election 22 2006 Gubernatorial Primary Election 24 2010 Gubernatorial Primary Election 26 Methodology 28 Appendix 29 Executive Summary s candidates prepare for the traditional general election campaign kickoff, it is clear Athat the 2010 campaign will shatter all previous records for political spending. While it is not possible to predict how much money will be spent between now and November 2, it may be useful to compare the levels of spending in this year’s primary campaign with that of previous election cycles. In this report, “Breaking the Bank,” staff of the Fair Political Practices Commission determined the spending of each candidate in every California gubernatorial primary since 1978 and calculated the actual spending per vote cast—in 2010 dollars—as candidates sought their party’s nomination. The conclusion: over time, gubernatorial primary elections have become more costly and fewer people turnout at the polls. But that only scratches the surface of what has happened since 19781. Other highlights of the report include: Since 1998, the rise of the self-funded candidate has dramatically increased the cost of running for governor in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Reps All Formatted
    Representative in Congress 1st Congressional District Lawrence R. Pamela Mike Thompson* Wiesner Elizondo DEM REP GRN Del Norte 5,261 3,657 241 Humboldt 43,081 17,164 3,754 Lake 15,572 7,875 839 Mendocino 25,452 9,180 2,535 Napa 38,329 14,959 1,667 Sonoma 21,990 9,584 1,481 Yolo 39,681 17,551 3,118 District Totals 189,366 79,970 13,635 Percent 67.0% 28.2% 4.8% 2nd Congressional District Mike Johnson Wally Herger* DEM REP Butte 32,750 43,945 Colusa 1,670 4,206 Glenn 2,611 6,586 Shasta 20,857 54,858 Siskiyou 6,387 13,920 Sutter 8,440 20,975 Tehama 6,555 16,123 Trinity 2,324 4,006 Yolo 3,306 5,337 Yuba 5,410 12,163 District Totals 90,310 182,119 Percent 33.1% 66.9% 3rd Congressional District Douglas Arthur Gabe Castillo Dan Lungren Tuma DEM REP LIB Alpine 300 335 34 Amador 5,516 11,212 583 Calaveras 6,861 14,000 967 Sacramento 85,211 148,505 7,520 Solano 2,137 3,686 206 District Totals 100,025 177,738 9,310 Percent 34.8% 62.0% 3.2% 4th Congressional District David I. Winters John T. Doolittle* DEM REP Butte 6,152 10,413 El Dorado 28,468 55,070 Lassen 2,838 8,312 Modoc 1,055 3,237 Nevada 21,682 29,695 10 Representative in Congress 4th Congressional District (cont.) Placer 48,969 97,518 Plumas 3,429 7,253 Sacramento 4,259 9,116 Sierra 591 1,312 District Totals 117,443 221,926 Percent 34.6% 65.4% 5th Congressional District Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election
    Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election By Sundeep Iyer On Election Day, Republicans maintained control of the House of Representatives. While two Congressional races remain undecided as of November 20, it appears that Democrats may have picked up about eight seats during the 2012 election,1 falling well short of the 25 seats Democrats needed to take back control of the House. Before the election, the Brennan Center estimated that redistricting would allow Republicans to maintain long-term control of 11 more seats in the House than they would have under the previous district lines.2 Now that the election is complete, it is worth re-examining the influence of redistricting on the results of the 2012 election. This brief assesses how the new district lines affected the partisan balance of power in the House. The report is the prologue to more extensive analyses, which will examine other aspects of redistricting, including the fairness of the process and its effect on minority representation, among others. Based on our initial analysis of the 2012 election, several important trends emerge: • Redistricting may have changed which party won the election in at least 25 House districts. Because of redistricting, it is likely that the GOP won about six more seats overall in 2012 than they would have under the old district lines. • Where Republicans controlled redistricting, the GOP likely won 11 more seats than they would have under the old district lines, including five seats previously held by Democrats. Democrats also used redistricting to their advantage, but Republicans redrew the lines for four times as many districts as Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(C)(4) Political Advertisements
    I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(c)(4) Political Advertisements By ANDREW C. B YRNES & C ORTLIN H. L ANNIN* Introduction ON JANUARY 21, 2010, the Supreme Court dropped a bomb on American politics. Coinciding with a powerful backlash in corporate boardrooms and among the conservative establishment against Presi- dent Obama and the Democratic Party-controlled Congress, and bol- stered by the media-beloved “tea party” movement, the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission1 transformed the American political landscape. The decision helped Republicans retake both houses of Congress in the 2010 elections and signals a change in the locus of electoral influence from parties and candi- dates, whose donors are disclosed, toward third party organizations, many with undisclosed contributors.2 The expenditure of large amounts of money to impact American elections did not begin with Citizens United.3 Nonetheless, since the * Mr. Byrnes is a partner, and Mr. Lannin is an associate of Covington & Burling, LLP. This Article represents only their personal views and does not necessarily reflect the views of Covington & Burling LLP, or any of its clients, attorneys and affiliates. Thanks to Robert Lenhard and Kevin Shortill for their feedback and guidance, and to Jonathan Chou for first-rate research assistance. 1. Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). 2. Id. at 940 (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (arguing that the ruling distorts BCRA’s regulatory scheme in favor of corporations/unions as opposed to parties); R. SAM G ARRETT, C ONG.
    [Show full text]
  • PPIC Statewide Survey
    Preface California is now in the midst of historic changes that will profoundly affect the future of the state. To improve understanding of these changes and their effect on the political status quo, PPIC will conduct a series of large-scale public opinion surveys that will provide the public and policymakers with relevant—advocacy-free—information on the following: • Californians' overall impressions and concerns about the economy, population growth, governance, and quality of life and about key issues such as education, welfare, and immigration. • Differences in social and political attitudes among different demographic, age, and economic groups and across different regions of the state. • The characteristics of groups that are shaping the state's elections and policy debates. • The political attitudes underlying "voter distrust" of government and low voter turnout and how both affect the outcomes of elections and the success of ballot initiatives. This is the first of the 1998 surveys. Press Release SIGNIFICANT CROSS-OVER VOTING LIKELY IN STATE’S FIRST OPEN PRIMARY, SURVEY SUGGESTS Crime Still Tops List of Policy Problems in California, But Majority Believe State Headed in Right Direction SAN FRANCISCO, California, April 15, 1998 — California’s first open primary is attracting a significant amount of cross-over voting in the race for Governor, according to a statewide survey released today by the Public Policy Institute of California. The first in a series of large-scale surveys conducted by Mark Baldassare shows Al Checchi with 19% support, Jane Harman 18%, and Gray Davis 12% among likely voters. Republican Dan Lungren receives 23%. While Checchi and Harman draw nearly equal support from Democrats, Checchi is attracting considerably more support than Harman from the Republican ranks (17% to 7%), including Republican women, and other voters (including independents).
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 P.M
    BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:30 p.m. EBRPD – Administrative Headquarters 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, California 94605 The following agenda items are listed for Committee consideration. In accordance with the Board Operating Guidelines, no official action of the Board will be taken at this meeting; rather, the Committee’s purpose shall be to review the listed items and to consider developing recommendations to the Board of Directors. A copy of the background materials concerning these agenda items, including any material that may have been submitted less than 72 hours before the meeting, is available for inspection on the District’s website (www. ebparks.org), the Headquarters reception desk, and at the meeting. Public Comment on Agenda Items If you wish to testify on an item on the agenda, please complete a speaker’s form and submit it to the recording secretary. Your name will be called when the item is announced for discussion. Accommodations and Access District facilities and meetings comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If special accommodations are needed for you to participate, please contact the Clerk of the Board at 510-544-2020 as soon as possible, but preferably at least three working days prior to the meeting. AGENDA TIME ITEM STATUS STAFF 12:30 I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION – N/A B. OTHER MATTERS I Doyle/Pfuehler 1. Endowments Update 2. Park Bond Update 3. Other Possible Ballot Measures (transportation, water) 4. Other Matters II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION R Pfuehler 1. H.R. 4208 (Thompson D-CA) and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice, Internment and Japanese-Peruvians in Peru, the United States, and Japan
    Volume 5 | Issue 9 | Article ID 2517 | Sep 03, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Racial Journeys: Justice, Internment and Japanese-Peruvians in Peru, the United States, and Japan Nobuko Adachi Racial Journeys: Justice, Internment and Peruvian economy can provide. The short story Japanese-Peruvians in Peru, the United of the Japanese in Peru, then, is many ways a States, and Japan microcosm of the larger saga of migration, discrimination and assimilation in the Nobuko Adachi globalized, racialized, transnational twenty-first century world. On June 13, 2007, the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs created a commission to investigate the facts and circumstances surrounding the relocation, internment, and deportation of Latin Americans of Japanese descent to the United States during World War II. Among these were almost two thousand Peruvian citizens and permanent residents. Though not as widely known as the famous saga of internment and redress of Japanese Americans and Japanese Canadians, in many ways the story of the Japanese in Peru is more intriguing, as much information still lies in the shadows, and is only now coming to light. Likewise, the issues of civil liberties that underscore this story—how a powerful nation can coerce a weaker ally into handing over some of its own people for imprisonment in another country without due process, on the ground that they are potential subversives—are all too obvious in a post 9/11 world fighting a Panama Canal Zone: Japanese Peruvians en route “war on terrorism”. Also, while many people to U.S. Internment Camps. April 2, 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Latinos, Asians Figure Prominently in California's New Electoral Landscape
    Chapter 4 Latinos, Asians Figure Prominently In California’s New Electoral Landscape By Susan Pinkus With a new century rapidly approaching, a new, strikingly Latinos and Asian Americans are viewed as up for grabs and different electoral landscape is emerging in California. The will become more powerful players in the state’s political ongoing changes in the ethnic and racial populations in Cali- process. fornia are affecting the way politics and campaign strategies are carried out in the Golden State. The 1998 general election The Legacy of Proposition 187 saw only the beginning of a transformation in voter coalitions, and demonstrated the impact of steadily growing ethnic and Part of the Proposition 187 legacy, the 1994 anti-immigra- racial groups on turnout and outcome. tion initiative, has been an increase in citizenship among California’s immigrants. With citizenship comes the right to California is one of the nation’s most multi-cultural states. vote. What does the growing number of Latino voters mean for Candidates who run in statewide elections are often frustrated the state and for the politicians trying to figure out how to run in their efforts to design strategies that address each ethnic and in a diverse cultural arena? racial group without alienating any of them. According to Rudy de la Garza, vice president of the Tomas Rivera Policy Institute and professor of government at “ While black voters have been extremely loyal the University of Texas, there is a new phenomenon in Latino to the Democratic party, and neither party thinks voting. “Before the 1975 Voting Rights Act, white candidates that will change, Latinos and Asian Americans needed Latino voters because they were spread across state are viewed as up for grabs and will become more Assembly districts.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE: House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology
    COMMITTEE: House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology SUBJECT: Federal Cybersecurity Mission DATE: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 MEMBERS: See List WITNESSES: Dave Powner, Director, Information Technology Management Issues, Government Accountability Office Jim Lewis, Project Director/Director, Senior Fellow, Technology and Public Policy Program, Center For Strategic and International Studies, Lead Organizer, Csis Commission On Cybersecurity, 44th Presidency Scott Charney, Vice President, Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Group, Co-Chair, Csis Commission on Cybersecurity Mary Ann Davidson, Chief Security Officer, Oracle Corporation' Amit Yoran, CEO, Netwitness, Former Director, National Cybersecurity Division, Department Of Homeland Security Amit Yoran, CEO, Netwitness, Former Director, National Cybersecurity Division, Department Of Homeland Security OPENING STATEMENTS Chairman Bennie Thompson Chairwoman Yvette Clarke Ranking Member Daniel Lungren Mr. Dave Powner Mr. Jim Lewis Mr. Scott Charney Ms. Mary Ann Davidson Mr. Amit Yoran CLARKE: The subcommittee will come to order. The subcommittee is meeting today to receive testimony on reviewing the federal cybersecurity mission. I will begin by recognizing myself for an opening statement. Good afternoon, and thank you to all of the witnesses for appearing before us today. I am pleased to chair today's hearing, my first as chair of the Emerging Threats Cybersecurity Science and Technology Subcommittee. While there may be a number of new faces here on the dais, I can assure everyone that this subcommittee will continue to address many of the same issues 1 from the 110th Congress. Over the next, two years, we will continue our oversight over nuclear detection programs, radiological threats, public health threats, cybersecurity, and the science and technology directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Affair House 2012 CR
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………….……1 PARTNERSHIP WITH LEGISTORM…………………………………………………...2 METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………………………..3 KEY FINDINGS…………………………………………………………………………..4 RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………………………………………….7 THE MEMBERS ALABAMA……………………………………………………………………...10 ARIZONA………………………………………………………………………..13 ARKANSAS……………………………………………………………………..18 CALIFORNIA…………………………………………………………………...20 COLORADO…………………………………………………………………….56 CONNECTICUT………………………………………………………………...62 FLORIDA………………………………………………………………………..65 GEORGIA………………………………………………………………………..86 HAWAII…………………………………………………………………………96 IDAHO…………………………………………………………………………...99 ILLINOIS……………………………………………………………………….101 INDIANA………………………………………………………………………120 IOWA…………………………………………………………………………...126 KANSAS……………………………………………………………………….129 KENTUCKY……………………………………………………………………133 LOUISIANA……………………………………………………………………140 MAINE…………………………………………………………………………146 MARYLAND…………………………………………………………………..148 MASSACHUSETTS…………………………………………………………...154 MICHIGAN…………………………………………………………………….161 MINNESOTA…………………………………………………………………..172 MISSISSIPPI…………………………………………………………………...178 MISSOURI……………………………………………………………………..183 MONTANA…………………………………………………………………….193 NEBRASKA……………………………………………………………………195 NEVADA……………………………………………………………………….198 NEW JERSEY………………………………………………………………….202 NEW MEXICO…………………………………………………………………210 NEW YORK……………………………………………………………………214 NORTH CAROLINA…………………………………………………………..229 OHIO……………………………………………………………………………237 OKLAHOMA…………………………………………………………………..249 OREGON……………………………………………………………………….255 PENNSYLVANIA……………………………………………………………...258
    [Show full text]