DOCSLIB.ORG

Maeu Behrensrepub 2010.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

007 Carsten Krohn 07 Turit Fröbe 128 Sylvia Necker Einleitung: Stadtkonzepte im 20. Jahrhundert Marcel Breuer: Potsdamer Platz 1929 Hans und Wassili Luckhardt: 020 Regina Stephan 077 Michele Stavagna Rund um den Zoo 1948 Joseph Maria Olbrich: Pariser Platz 1907 Erich Mendelsohn: 131 Eva-Maria Barkhofen 023 Eva Maria Froschauer Hochhaus Friedrichstraße 1929 Sergius Ruegenberg: Hans Bernoulli: Pariser Platz 1907 080 Bernd Nicolai Flughafen am Bahnhof Zoo 1948 026 Wolfgang Sonne Hannes Meyer: Arbeiterbank des ADGB 1929 13 Eduard Kögel Bruno Schmitz: Groß-Berlin 1910 083 Manfred Speidel Richard Paulick: Stalinallee 1951 029 Harald Bodenschatz Bruno Taut: Reichstagserweiterung 1930 137 Florian Seidel Hermann Jansen: Tempelhofer Feld 1910 086 Jan R. Krause Ernst May: Siedlung Fennpfuhl 1957 032 Nikolaus Bernau Egon Eiermann und Fritz Jaenecke: 10 Bernd Bess Ludwig Hoffmann: Justizgebäude Moabit 1930 West-Berliner Senat: Stadtautobahn 1957 Straßenachse zur Museumsinsel 1913 089 Christian Wolsdorff 13 Carola Hein 035 Markus Jager Walter Gropius: Jørn Utzon: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 Martin Mächler: Nord-Süd-Durchbruch 1920 Wannsee-Uferbebauung 1931 16 Kenneth Frampton 038 Holger Kleine 092 Karin Lelonek Arthur Korn und Stephen Rosenberg: Max Berg: Hochhaus Friedrichstraße 1921 Dominikus Böhm: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 01 Beatriz Colomina Denkmal der nationalen Arbeit 1933 19 Karsten Schubert Ludwig Mies van der Rohe: 095 Georg Ebbing Walter Schwagenscheidt und Tassilo Sittmann: Hochhaus Friedrichstraße 1921 Otto Kohtz: Hochschulstadt 1937 Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 0 Friederike Hoebel 098 Brigitte Jacob 152 Pamela Theodora Wassili Luckhardt: Emil Fahrenkamp: Hochschulstadt 1937 Le Corbusier: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 Volkshaus am Kaiserdamm 1921 101 Elke Dittrich 155 Carsten Ruhl 07 Stef Jacobs Ernst Sagebiel: Achse zum Kreuzberg 1938 Hans Scharoun: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 Mart Stam: Geschäftshaus Am Knie 1922 10 Jörn Düwel 158 Werner Sewing 050 Hans-Dieter Nägelke Albert Speer: Nord-Süd-Achse 1941 Johannes Hendrik van den Broek und Cornelis van Eesteren: Unter den Linden 1925 107 Jo Sollich Jacob Berend Bakema: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 053 Matthias Schirren Herbert Rimpl: Achteckplatz 1941 161 Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani Hugo Häring: 110 Roland May Alison und Peter Smithson: Hochhausstadt am Gendarmenmarkt 1928 Paul Bonatz und Kurt Dübbers: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 056 Michele Caja Oberkommando der Kriegsmarine 1942 16 Sophie Wolfrum Ludwig Hilberseimer: 113 Marco de Michelis Friedrich Spengelin, Fritz Eggeling und Geschäftsstadt am Gendarmenmarkt 1928 Heinrich Tessenow: Großsiedlung Drewitz 1942 Gerd Pempelfort: Hauptstadt Berlin 1958 059 Norbert Baues 116 André Deschan 167 Peter Müller Werner Kallmorgen: Tiergartenring 1928 Wilhelm Kreis: Museen an der Spree 1943 Gerhard Kosel: Marx-Engels-Forum 1958 062 Stanford Anderson 119 Elke Sohn 170 Elmar Kossel Peter Behrens: Platz der Republik 1929 Kollektivplan 1946 Hermann Henselmann: Hauptstadt der DDR 1959 065 Wolfgang Pehnt 122 Wolfgang Schäche 173 Cornelia Escher Hans Poelzig: Platz der Republik 1929 Richard Ermisch: Wiederaufbau Innenstadt 1946 Josef Kaiser, Hans Gericke und Peter Schweizer: 068 Simone Oelker 125 Sylvia Claus Zentrale Kuppelhalle 1960 Otto Haesler: Siedlung in Neukölln 1929 Max Taut: 176 Gregor Harbusch 071 Ludovica Scarpa Wiederaufbau rund um die Gedächtniskirche 1948 Ludwig Leo: Martin Wagner: Potsdamer Platz 1929 Wohnbebauung in der Gropiusstadt 1962 179 Margret Becker 230 Florian Tigges 287 Lilian Pfaff Stefan Wewerka: Wohnviertel Ruhwald 1965 Raimund Abraham: Kirche an der Mauer 1982 Jacques Herzog, Pierre de Meuron und 182 Christoph Schnoor 233 Esra Akcan Rémy Zaugg: Berlin-Zentrum 1990 Atelier 5: Wohnviertel Ruhwald 1965 Richard Meier: Wohnanlage Am Karlsbad 1982 290 Goerd Peschken 185 Axel John Wieder 236 Dieter Hoffmann-Axthelm Richard Rogers: Potsdamer Platz 1991 Jerzy Soltan: Museum am Kulturforum 1965 Hans Hollein: Kulturforum 1983 293 Matthias Pabsch 188 Alexander E. Koblitz 239 Wilfried Wang Daniel Libeskind: Potsdamer Platz 1991 Josef Paul Kleihues und Heiner Moldenschardt: Álvaro Siza: Kulturforum 1983 296 Carson Chan Wohnsiedlung Ruhwald 1967 22 Katrin Schamun MVRDV: Berlin Voids 1991 191 Christian Gänshirt: Colin Rowe: Grüne Nord-Süd-Achse 1983 299 Jörg H. Gleiter Fritz Haller: Totale Stadt 1968 25 Gernot Weckherlin Peter Eisenman: Max-Reinhardt-Haus 1992 19 Frank Schmitz John Hejduk: Gelände des ehemaligen 302 Hannes Mayer Jürgen Sawade: Prinz-Albrecht-Palais 1984 Philip Johnson: Berlin Alternative 1993 Überbauung Kurfürstendamm 1966 28 Klaus Englert 305 Gudrun Wiedemer 197 Ursula Müller Rafael Moneo: Gelände des ehemaligen Frank Gehry: Erweiterung Museumsinsel 1993 Ralf Schüler und Ursulina Schüler-Witte: Prinz-Albrecht-Palais 1984 308 Andreas Zerr Grunewald-Bandstadt 1971 251 Hendrik Tieben Norman Foster: Reichstag und Spreebogen 1993 200 Felix Lüdeke Aldo Rossi: 311 Andreas Voigt Hermann Fehling und Daniel Gogel: Deutsches Historisches Museum 1988 Axel Schultes und Charlotte Frank: Tiergartenviertel 1973 25 Philipp Oswalt Schlossplatz 1996 203 Thomas Steigenberger Cedric Price: „Vier Schritte weiter“ 1988 31 Kristin Feireiss Georg Heinrichs und Metastadt: 257 Yael Reisner Wiel Arets: Schlossplatz 1997 Autobahnüberbauung Rehberge 1974 Peter Cook: Way out West 1988 317 Ole W. Fischer 206 Wilfried Kuehn 260 Andres Lepik Peter Zumthor: Topographie des Terrors 1997 Oswald Mathias Ungers: Lebbeus Woods: Berlin Underground 1988 320 Index Grünes Stadtarchipel 1977 263 Johannes Cramer 327 Abbildungsverzeichnis 209 Philipp Meuser Morphosis: Überbauung der Mauer 1988 Rob Krier: 266 Jasper Cepl Idealplan der Südlichen Friedrichstadt 1977 Hans Kollhoff: Studie Moabit 1988 212 Jesko Fezer 269 Walter Nägeli Frei Otto: Baumhäuser 1980 Zaha Hadid: Victoria-Areal 1988 215 Anne Schmedding 272 Oliver Elser Ron Herron: Erneuerung der Kongresshalle 1980 Miroslav Šik: Moabiter Werder 1988 218 Paul Kahlfeldt 275 Yehuda Safran Léon Krier: Tegeler Hafen 1980 Steven Holl: 221 Hubertus Adam Amerika-Gedenkbibliothek 1989 Max Bill: 278 Susanne von Falkenhausen Erweiterung der Neuen Nationalgalerie 1981 Robert Venturi und Denise Scott Brown: 22 Joachim Jäger Brandenburger Treppe 1990 Renzo Piano: 281 Alexander Pellnitz Erweiterung der Neuen Nationalgalerie 1981 Giorgio Grassi: Berlin morgen 1990 227 Christian Welzbacher 28 Nadin Heinich Rem Koolhaas: Südliche Friedrichstadt 1981 Bernard Tschumi: Berlin morgen 1990 5 1929 Peter Behrens: Platz der Republik Early in 1929 the Administration of the Reichstag announced a limited competition for the design of an administrative building adjoining the Reichstag. Of less immediate concern, but more significantly, the compe- tition also engaged a remarkably open, lightly program- med conceptualization of the urban space around the Reichstag. Observing the conditions of the invitation, the additions to the Reichstag were designed in some detail with plans, elevations and perspective views. The competing architects, however, took full advantage of the freedom allowed for their urban projects. They would obviously address the existing large place in front of the Reichstag, the Platz der Republik, but also reached out extensively to the Brandenburg Gate and Tiergarten on the south, the Park Bellevue on the west, and/or the area of the Lehrter railroad station to the north.1 The programmatic needs were real. The membership of the German Parliament had grown as had its need for an expanded staff with adequate archival, library and meeting resources.2 Uniting the widely distributed mi- nistries of the government in a single place was a com- pelling argument as well as the prospect of providing sites for the embassies of other nations. These practical reasons were strongly reinforced by ambitions for a governmental center of a representational character that would stand on a European scale and contribute to the vision of Berlin as a Weltstadt. For many, this representational drive was particularly strong, for the German nation and its democracy were new, deserving to be adequately marked in their own right and in differentiation from the near-by great east- west axis through the Brandenburg Gate to the Imperial Palace and great institutions at the river Spree — the most evident urban structure of Berlin and, despite whatever architectural excellence, all symbolizing a royal and imperial past.3 Burdening the prospects for the 1929 competition was the fact that just two years earlier an official competition for such an addition to the Reichstag and an ill-formed ambition for the Platz der Republik had results that were understood to have yielded only a negative conclusion: 52 53 63 54 that the competition had been too narrowly conceived.4 tion) and Peter Behrens (1868–1940) were among the was formed to extend equally north and south of the new invitees.8 Though extensively published, the results great east-west Berlin axis. The Brandenburg Gate A private initiative of the same year of 1927 was more of the 1929 competition were also not well received thus remained in place but now in confrontation with encouraging. The architects associated under the and had no physical result.9 the Reichstag, and seemingly winning the debate over name “Der Ring,” sponsored an exhibition of city-buil- imperial and republican axes. ding schemes for Berlin, particularly for the Platz der On the axis of the Reichstag, Behrens placed a long, Stanford Anderson Republik.5 The design by Hugo Häring was particularly broad forum, made fully open by the displacement of impressive:
Recommended publications
  • Pressemappe Freiheit Novembergruppe 7.11.18

    Pressemappe Freiheit Novembergruppe 7.11.18

    Freiheit Die Kunst der Novembergruppe 1918–1935 09.11.2018–11.03.2019 PRESSEMAPPE INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Allgemeine Presseinformationen (Seite 1) Ausstellungstexte (Seite 4) Ausstellungskatalog (Seite 7) Bildungs- und Rahmenprogramm (Seite 8) Online-Kampagne #novembergruppe (Seite 12) Pressebilder (Seite 13) WWW.BERLINISCHEGALERIE.DE BERLINISCHE GALERIE LANDESMUSEUM FÜR MODERNE ALTE JAKOBSTRASSE 124-128 FON +49 (0) 30 –789 02–600 KUNST, FOTOGRAFIE UND ARCHITEKTUR 10969 BERLIN FAX +49 (0) 30 –789 02–700 STIFTUNG ÖFFENTLICHEN RECHTS POSTFACH 610355 – 10926 BERLIN [email protected] PRESSEINFORMATION Ulrike Andres Leitung Marketing und Kommunikation Tel. +49 (0)30 789 02 829 [email protected] Presse-Kontakt: Smith – Agentur für Markenkommu- nikation Felix Schnieder-Henninger Tel. +49 (0)30 609 809 711 Mobil +49 (0)163 2515150 [email protected] Berlin, 7. November 2018 FREIHEIT Die Kunst der Novembergruppe 1918 bis 1935 9. November 2018 bis 11. März 2019 Pressekonferenz: 07.11., 11 Uhr, Eröffnung: 08.11., 19 Uhr, Kindervernissage 11.11., 15-17 Uhr Eintritt: 10 Euro (erm. 7 Euro); Öffnungszeiten: Mi.-Mo. 10-18 Uhr Demokratie und Vielfalt. Mit dem Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs und dem Untergang des Kaiserreichs öffneten sich in Deutschland die Tore zu Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit. Die junge Demokratie hatte es nicht leicht. Die bereits im November 1918 wäh- rend der Revolution in Berlin initiierte Künstler*in- nenvereinigung Novembergruppe entwickelte sich rasch zum starken, innovativen Spieler in der Kunstwelt und auf dem Gesellschaftsparkett der Weimarer Republik. Der pluralistisch verfasste Verein profitierte von der liberalen staatlichen Kunstförderung. Offen für alle Stilrichtungen der Bildenden Kunst, für Architekt*innen, Schriftstel- ler*innen, Komponist*innen und Filmemacher*in- nen bot die Novembergruppe eine Plattform für Freiheit, Demokratie und Vielfalt.
  • 'A True Witness of Transience': Berlin's Kaiser- Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche and the Symbolic Use of Architectural Fragments I

    'A True Witness of Transience': Berlin's Kaiser- Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche and the Symbolic Use of Architectural Fragments I

    European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire ISSN: 1350-7486 (Print) 1469-8293 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cerh20 ‘A true witness of transience’: Berlin's Kaiser- Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche and the symbolic use of architectural fragments in modernity Rüdiger Zill To cite this article: Rüdiger Zill (2011) ‘A true witness of transience’: Berlin's Kaiser-Wilhelm- Gedächtniskirche and the symbolic use of architectural fragments in modernity, European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire, 18:5-6, 811-827, DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2011.618332 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2011.618332 Published online: 04 Jan 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 231 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cerh20 Download by: [British Library] Date: 22 February 2017, At: 09:58 European Review of History—Revue europe´enne d’histoire Vol. 18, Nos. 5–6, October–December 2011, 811–827 ‘A true witness of transience’: Berlin’s Kaiser-Wilhelm- Geda¨chtniskirche and the symbolic use of architectural fragments in modernity Ru¨diger Zill* Einstein Forum, Potsdam, Germany This paper considers the ruin in the context of three emblematic modern German sites, the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Geda¨chtniskirche in Berlin, the Frauenkirche in Dresden and the Reichstag, also in Berlin. Different sites, the author shows, format and present the relationship between past and present in different ways. The paper develops its argument using the views of German philosopher Gu¨nther Anders (Hannah Arendt’s first husband), and extracts from his diaries and travels in Germany after the Second World War.
  • 1968, Tendenza and Education in Aldo Rossi

    1968, Tendenza and Education in Aldo Rossi

    1 Histories of PostWar Architecture 2 | 2018 | 1 Monument in Revolution: 1968, Tendenza and Education in Aldo Rossi Kenta Matsui PhD Candidate, The University of Tokyo (Japan), Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering [email protected] MA Degree in History of Architecture at the Graduate school of the University of Tokyo. Research Fellowship for Young Scientists supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (2016-2018). His research focuses on the architectural theories of Aldo Rossi and other contemporary Italian architects in relation to the contexts of postwar Italy. ABSTRACT In the 1960’s, as Italian architectural schools faced student protests and forceful occupation attempts, Aldo Rossi tried to reform the schools through the idea of ‘tendency school’ shared with Carlo Aymonino, and to reconstruct architecture as discipline and theory. His theory has two aspects: urban analysis and architectural project. The former presents a dynamic conception of the temporal evolution of the city, as if echoing the restless social situation of the time; the latter centers on the logicality of architecture represented by monuments. This study explores the meaning of this dualism between urban analysis and architectural project as an intent for revolution, and in light of this, investigates the idea of ‘monument in revolution’. This study was supported by a research fund from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Number JP16J05298). I would like to thank Bébio Amaro (Assistant Professor at Tianjin University, School of Architecture) for his aid in checking and revising the English text. Additionally, I would like to kindly acknowledge the many helpful suggestions and remarks provided by the anonymous reviewers, which have greatly contributed towards improving the overall quality and readability of this paper.
  • In Unserem Heutigen Verständnis Aller- Dings Ein 'Naiv

    In Unserem Heutigen Verständnis Aller- Dings Ein 'Naiv

    121 haupt möglich - allgemein, politisch und philosophisch Und: Ich bitte Sie herzlich, sollten Sie auf weitere Hin­ interessierter - in unserem heutigen Verständnis aller­ weise, Quellen und Lebenszeugnisse des Künstlers dings ein 'naiv-unpolitischer' Zeitgenosse. stoßen, so bitte ich um Nachricht. Engagiert im 'ARBEITSRAT FÜR KUNST' 1918-1921 Vielen Dank. und mit Ausstellungsbeteiligungen bei der 'NOVEM­ BERGRUPPE' in Berlin, punktuell bei den 'Großen Ber­ liner Kunstausstellungen' - Gruppe der 'ABSTRAKTEN', Ausstellungen bei Alfred Flechtheim, Israel Ber Neu­ mann in Berlin und der Galerie Von der Goltz in Mün­ chen, befand er sich - mit seiner Unterschrift unter di­ versen Aufrufen und eigenen Statements zur damals diskutierten 'Revolutionierung des Lebens durch die Kunst', durch die Beteiligung an der '1. DADA-Ausstel- lung' und einer Ausstellung 'Unbekannte Architekten' in der Galerie I. B. Neumann in Berlin, mit zeitgemäßen expressionistisch-utopischen Architekturentwürfen, auf der Höhe der zeitgenössischen künstlerischen Avant­ garde. ANMERKUNGEN Vor diesem Hintergrund und durch die vielen regiona­ (1) Kurt Gerstenberg, 'Revolution in der Architektur', CICERONE len wie internationalen Ausstellungsbeteiligungen war Xl. Jg., Heft 9, Januar 1919. und ist er - dank der offensiven Ausstellungsaktivitä­ (2) Manfred Speidel, Katalog 'Natur und Fantasie - Retrospektive ten der Galerie DER STURM Herwarth Waldens in Ber­ Bruno Taut in Magdeburg 1995, Berlin 1995. lin - und vor dem Hintergrund seiner bisher sichtbar gewordenen qualitätvollen Bilder, neben all den heute (3) Ausstellungkatalog Der Sturm, 51. Ausstellung, April 1917, Ar­ noch bekannten und berühmten Künstlerinnen jener nold Topp, Neil Waiden, Berlin 1917. Zeit, gleichberechtigt zugehörig anzusehen. (4) Zitiert nach H.A.Peters in Soester Anzeiger 8./9. Mai 1993. Nachdem, bis in die letzten Jahre, vor allem die gro­ (5) Katalog GROSSE BERLINER KUNST-AUSSTELLUNG 1926.
  • Inhalt Contents

    Inhalt Contents

    Inhalt Contents 7 Prolog 7 Prologue 13 Vom Jugendstil zur Moderne 13 From Jugendstil to Modernism 19 Das Bauhaus in Weimar, Dessau und Berlin 19 The Bauhaus in Weimar, Dessau and Berlin 27 Berlin und die Moderne 27 Berlin and Modernism 63 Das Neue Bauen in Deutschland 63 New Building in Germany 127 Architektur der Neuen Sachlichkeit in Europa 127 The Architecture of new Objectivity in Europe 179 Internationaler Stil – 179 International Style – Modernes Bauen auf der ganzen Welt Modern Building all over the world 227 Epilog – Die Erben des Bauhauses 227 Epilogue – The Legacy of the Bauhaus 233 Anhang 233 Appendix Bauhaus.indd 5 12.09.18 12:58 Prolog Prologue Bauhaus.indd 7 12.09.18 12:58 8 Israel, Tel Aviv, Wohnhaus Recanati-Saporta, 1935/36, Salomon Liaskowski, Jakob Orenstein Israel, Tel Aviv, Residential building in Recanati-Saporta, 1935/36, Salomon Liaskowski, Jakob Orenstein Bauhaus.indd 8 12.09.18 12:58 Das »Bauhaus« war ursprünglich eine 1919 in Weimar gegründete The “Bauhaus” was originally an art school founded in Weimar in 1919. Kunstschule. Ihr Einfluss erwies sich jedoch als so bedeutend, dass Its influence, however, was so significant that in everyday speech the der Begriff heute umgangssprachlich mit verschiedenen Strömungen term is equated today with various modernist movements in architec- der Moderne in Architektur und Design in der ersten Hälfte des20 . ture and design in the first half of the 20th Century. This broader sense Jahrhunderts gleichgesetzt wird. In diesem erweiterten Sinn wurde of the word is relevant for the choice of buildings in this book.
  • 9054 MAM MNM Gallery Notes

    9054 MAM MNM Gallery Notes

    Museums for a New Millennium Concepts Projects Buildings October 3, 2003 – January 18, 2004 MUSEUMS FOR A NEW MILLENNIUM DOCUMENTS THE REMARKABLE SURGE IN MUSEUM BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT AT THE TURN OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM. THROUGH MODELS, DRAWINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS, IT PRESENTS TWENTY-FIVE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT MUSEUM BUILDING PROJECTS FROM THE PAST TEN YEARS. THE FEATURED PROJECTS — ALL KEY WORKS BY RENOWNED ARCHITECTS — OFFER A PANORAMA OF INTERNATIONAL MUSEUM ARCHITECTURE AT THE OPENING OF THE 21ST CENTURY. Thanks to broad-based public support, MAM is currently in the initial planning phase of its own expansion with Museum Park, the City of Miami’s official urban redesign vision for Bicentennial Park. MAM’s expansion will provide Miami with a 21st-century art museum that will serve as a gathering place for cultural exchange, as well as an educational resource for the community, and a symbol of Miami’s role as a 21st-century city. In the last decade, Miami has quickly become known as the Gateway of the Americas. Despite this unique cultural and economic status, Miami remains the only major city in the United States without a world-class art museum. The Museum Park project realizes a key goal set by the community when MAM was established in 1996. Santiago Calatrava, Milwaukee Art Museum, 1994-2002, Milwaukee, At that time, MAM emerged with a mandate to create Wisconsin. View from the southwest. Photo: Jim Brozek a freestanding landmark building and sculpture park in a premiere, waterfront location. the former kings of France was opened to the public, the Louvre was a direct outcome of the French Revolution.
  • The Fagus Factory in Alfeld

    The Fagus Factory in Alfeld

    THE FAGUS FACTORY IN ALFELD NOMINATION FOR INSCRIPTION ON THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST SEPTEMBER 2009 Summary SUMMARY I Fagus Factory – Nomination for Inscription on the Unesco World Heritage List II Summary State party Federal Republic of Germany State, province or region Lower Saxony, town of Alfeld Name of property Fagus factory Geographical coordinates to the nearest 51° 59’ 01” degrees North second 09° 48’ 40” degrees East Textual description of the boundary(ies) of Historical industrial area to the west of the the nominated property core city of Alfeld: the nominated area borders the Hanover-Göttingen rail route in the northeast and the Hannoversche Straße in the southwest. A4 (or „letter“) size map of the nominated See end of summary property, showing boundaries and buffer zone (if present) Justification With the construction of the Fagus factory, Statement of outstanding universal value Gropius made a breakthrough to new, modern art that went hand in hand with the age of technology. The Fagus factory, with a radical break from the conventional design practice, represents for the first time a new expression of architecture, which develops space and form from function, takes into account the light, air and lucidity require- ments of its users and makes use of the new technical possibilities of construction with glass and steel in industrially pre-produced processing. Glass, which is actually an unsubstantial material,becomes a formative building material and mode of expression of architecture.The design concepts underlying this construction had a decisive influence on the development of twentieth century architecture not only in Germany and Europe, but around the globe.
  • The Tectonic Construction of a Façade. Milanese Buildings by Giovanni Muzio (1920-1940)

    The Tectonic Construction of a Façade. Milanese Buildings by Giovanni Muzio (1920-1940)

    The tectonic construction of a façade. Milanese buildings by Giovanni Muzio (1920-1940) Michele Caja, Politecnico di Milano ABSTRACT Analyze a project means to re-build the constructive principles and rules that compose it, without imposing new forms – which implies the risk of falling into empty formalism – but re-finding the implicit structure existing below it. An operational analysis of the object of study is not only a model to understand the construction of a project, but becomes directly instrumental to the project itself, assuming a perspective of historic continuity. In this particular case, the analysis focuses on some architectures built by Giovanni Muzio in Milan between the ‘20s and ‘40s of last century. The analysis focuses on the theme of the architectural facade, intended as tectonic construction or bas-relief architecture (Relief-Architektur), which reflects the transposition of the sculptural depth of the columns’ order on an architectonic façade. The theme of the facade is analyzed in regard to different aspects, as the relationship between the building structure and the proportional system of openings; the order of tectonic elements; the decoration. The investigation techniques used to highlight these issues are: the ratio of full / empty or horizontal / vertical elements; the structure of axes; the role of geometric figures; the layers building the depth of a façade; the components of decoration. MUZIO MILANO; FAÇADE ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCTION/ DE CORA TION 1. INTRODUCTION The rediscovery of the architecture of the past, from the '60s until the postmodern season, was born as a reaction to the modernist veto againsthistory. The ideological content of this reaction has been shown in the manner of use of classic elements, mostly used in demonstrative and provocative terms, in the form of ironic or iconic quotations.
  • Volk Elterthe Limits of Community—The

    Volk Elterthe Limits of Community—The

    Downloaded from The Limits of Community—The http://oaj.oxfordjournals.org Possibilities of Society:vol On Modernk Architecture in Weimar Germany at University of California Santa Barbara on April 28, 2010 elter Volker M. Welter Downloaded from http://oaj.oxfordjournals.org at University of California at Santa Barbara on April 28, 2010 The Limits of Community – The Possibilities of Society: On Modern Architecture in Weimar Germany Volker M. Welter Downloaded from 1. Ferdinand To¨nnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Communismus und Socialismus als empirischer Kulturformen (Fues: Leipzig, 1887). In the historiography of early-twentieth-century modern German architecture 2. Ferdinand To¨nnies, Gemeinschaft und and urban planning, the idea of community has been a major analytical Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie (Karl category. Whether garden city, garden suburb, workers’ housing, factory http://oaj.oxfordjournals.org Curtius: Berlin, 1912). The third edition was estate, or social housing estate, the often unified architectural forms seem to published in 1920, the combined fourth and fifth edition in 1922, the combined sixth and seventh suggest community. Any enclosing geometric urban form is often understood in 1926, and an eighth edition in 1935. to strengthen the introverted character that clearly separates such settlements from the big city. In short, these communities are depicted as shining beacons 3. Helmuth Plessner, Die Grenzen der Gemeinschaft. Eine Kritik des sozialen Radikalismus of a new social order in the otherwise harsh urban surroundings of society. (Friedrich Cohen: Bonn, 1924). In the following I Stylistically, such communities were designed in both traditionalist and use Helmuth Plessner, The Limits of Community.
  • Ernesto Nathan Rogers

    Ernesto Nathan Rogers

    ISBN 978-2-86364-286-3 / 1950-1980 italienne, architecturale Bernardo Secchi Daniele Vitale Portoghesi Paolo Scolari Massimo Giovanna Gavazzeni Angelo Villa Cacciari Massimo Tafuri Manfredo Vittorio Gregotti Carlo Aymonino Giorgio Grassi Aldo Rossi Guido Canella Rogers Ernesto Nathan avant-garde Une Tendenza La — Mazzoni Cristiana / www.editionsparentheses.com www.editionsparentheses.com Bernardo Secchi Daniele Vitale Portoghesi Paolo Scolari Massimo Giovanna Gavazzeni Angelo Villa Cacciari Massimo Tafuri Manfredo Vittorio Gregotti Carlo Aymonino Giorgio Grassi Aldo Rossi Guido Canella Rogers Ernesto Nathan ISBN 978-2-86364-286-3 / 1950-1980 italienne, 1950-1980 italienne avant-garde une Cristiana Mazzoni É P É architecturale LA TENDENZA avant-garde Une Tendenza La — Mazzoni Cristiana / www.editionsparentheses.com www.editionsparentheses.com ISBN 978-2-86364-286-3 / 1950-1980 italienne, L’auteur remercie l’École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Strasbourg, ENSAS-Amup, pour le soutien apporté à la préparation de cet ouvrage. architecturale Traductions de l’italien : Marie Bels. avant-garde Une Tendenza La L ’ — Publiée avec le concours du Centre national du livre et de la Direction générale des patrimoines (Sous-direction de l’architecture) du ministère de la Culture et de la Communication Mazzoni Cristiana / Copyright © 2013, Éditions Parenthèses, Marseille, pour la présente édition et les traductions. © Franco Angeli Editore, Milan (p. 166-180) ; © Cluva, Venise (p. 195-226) ; © Edizioni Dedalo, Bari (p. 242-259) ; © Vittorio Gregotti, Milan (p. 227-241, 326-329) ; © Marsilio Editori, Venise (p. 162-165) ; © Officina Editori, Rome (p. 260-274) ; © Paolo Portoghesi, Rome (p. 299-304) ; © Fondation Aldo Rossi, Milan (p. 125-161) ; © Massimo Scolari, Venise (p.
  • Aldo Rossi Papers, 1943-1999

    Aldo Rossi Papers, 1943-1999

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c85d8tjb No online items Finding aid for the Aldo Rossi papers, 1943-1999 Finding aid prepared by Laura Schroffel Finding aid for the Aldo Rossi 880319 1 papers, 1943-1999 Descriptive Summary Title: Aldo Rossi papers Date (inclusive): 1943-1999 Number: 880319 Creator/Collector: Rossi, Aldo, 1931-1997 Physical Description: 34.0 linear feet(31 boxes, 14 flat file folders, and 1 roll) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California, 90049-1688 (310) 440-7390 Abstract: The Aldo Rossi papers contain a selection of works by the prolific architect, writer, artist and theorist. The collection includes notebooks, lectures and course materials, assorted writings and correspondence, drafts for publications, clippings and ephemera. A set of architectural drawings for the Palazzo dei Congressi, Milan (not realized) consisting of preliminary sketches and design plans as well as an architectural design in pencil and oil are also included. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in Italian. Biographical / Historical Note One of the most important Italian architects of the second half of the 20th century Aldo Rossi is considered by some to be an integral author of the postmodern movement of architecture. Rossi received international acclaim not just as an architect but also as a designer, artist and theorist. Rossi was born in 1931 in Milan. He began his studies in architecture in 1949 at Milan Polytechnic.
  • XIONG-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (9.613Mb)

    XIONG-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (9.613Mb)

    Copyright by Xiangnan Xiong 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Xiangnan Xiong Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: From Am Karlsbad 24 to the Tugendhat House: Mies van der Rohe’s Quest for a New Form of Living Committee: Christopher Long, Supervisor Mirka Benes Greg Castillo Richard Cleary Francesco Passanti From Am Karlsbad 24 to the Tugendhat House: Mies van der Rohe’s Quest for a New Form of Living by Xiangnan Xiong, B.Arch; M. Arch Hist. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2016 Acknowledgements I would like to, first and foremost, acknowledge Christopher Long, my advisor and the supervisor of this project. He welcomed me to UT in fall 2011 and has directed me to pursue my interest with scholarly rigor and originality ever since. He read chapters of this dissertation multiple times and offered insightful revising suggestions. The completion of this project would not have been possible without his dedicated and thoughtful training for me. I am grateful to other committee members for benefiting my project in various ways. This project was developed from a seminar paper I wrote for Richard Cleary. I wish to thank him for his timely encouragement and for inspiring me to approach things in different ways. Courses with Mirka Benes stimulated my interest in cultural aspects of architecture, and conversations with Francesco Passanti added depth to my work.