DOCSLIB.ORG

Greek Occupied Macedonia (1913-1989)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Greek occupied Macedonia (1913-1989) By Stoian Kiselinovski (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) Greek occupied Macedonia (1913-1989) Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2018 by Stoian Kiselinovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition ********** January 24, 2018 ********** 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ..........................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE - NATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE XX CENTURY (1900 - 1913).....................8 1. BULGARIAN STATISTICS ON THE NATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA ...............................................................................9 2. SERBIAN STATISTICS ON THE NATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA ......................................................................................................12 3. GREEK STATISTICS ON THE NATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA ......................................................................................................14 CHAPTER TWO - CHANGING THE ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA (1913-1928)......................................................................................20 1. THE BALKAN WARS AND THE FIRST POPULATION EXPULSION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA .............22 2. THE NEUILLY CONVENTION AND THE SO-CALLED “VOLUNTARY” EXCHANGE OF POPULATIONS BETWEEN GREECE AND BULGARIA.......................................................24 3. THE LAUSANNE PEACE TREATY AND EXCHANGE OF POPULATIONS BETWEEN GREECE AND TURKEY...........29 4. ETHNIC AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA AFTER THE GREAT GREEK COLONIZATION........................................................................35 A) ETHNIC CONSEQUENCES .................................................35 B) ETHNIC CHANGES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE (1913-1940) ..............................37 C) POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES ...........................................39 D) ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES...........................................41 CHAPTER THREE - NATIONAL SUBJUGATION AND RESISTANCE OF THE MACEDONIAN PEOPLE IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA (1913-1940) .......................................45 1. NATIONAL SUBJUGATION OF THE MACEDONIAN PEOPLE (1913-1940) ..................................................................45 A) APPEARANCE OF DUALISM IN THE MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE ...............................................................................51 3 2. THE MACEDONIAN PEOPLE’S RESISTANCE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THEIR MACEDONIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY (1913-1940) ..............................................................53 CHAPTER FOUR – THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREECE AND THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION (1918-1940) ..........................................................................................................57 1. COMINTERN POLICY AND THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION IN EUROPE ......................................57 2. THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS POLICY OF - “NO STATE, NO NATION” - (1918-1924) .......................59 A) THE SOCIALIST WORKERS’ PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE UNRESOLVED NATIONAL AND TERRITORIAL ISSUES....................................................61 B) THE SOCIALIST WORKERS’ PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE UNRESOLVED NATIONAL AND TERRITORIAL ISSUES IN THE DODECANES ISLANDS AND CYPRUS...........................................................63 C) THE SOCIALIST WORKERS’ PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE SO-CALLED GREEK MINORITY IN SOUTHERN ALBANIA ...................................64 D) THE SOCIALIST WORKERS’ PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION..................................................................................65 3. THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS POLICY OF “STATE WITHOUT A NATION” (1924-1931)...................67 A) THE CPG’S POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL CRISIS AND THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION .............71 B) THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION AND THE STAGNATION OF THE GREEK WORKING MOVEMENT IN THE PERIOD FROM 1923 TO 1931..........................................78 Government problems..................................................................79 The Agrarian Question.................................................................81 The Macedonian National Question.............................................82 Existence of the Macedonian nation ............................................83 4. THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREECE AND ITS POLICY OF “NATION WITHOUT A STATE” (1935-1940)...................88 5. REAL MOTIVES FOR CHANGING THE POLICY FOR A UNITED AND INDEPENDENT MACEDONIA.......................97 А) EXTERNAL FACTORS ........................................................97 B) INTERNAL FACTORS..........................................................99 4 Attracting the Greek people en masse........................................100 “Disarming” the Greek bourgeoisie...........................................104 Getting around the internal political crises and controversy over the Macedonian National Question............................................107 The CPG’s real attitude towards the Macedonian National Question .....................................................................................114 Presence of the “Megali Idea” (Greater Greece)........................116 Existence of the Macedonian nation ..........................................118 6. THE POLITICAL SITUATION IN GREECE AND THE MACEDONIAN NATIONAL QUESTION DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR..........................................................121 CHAPTER FIVE – THE MACEDONIAN PEOPLE IN THE NATIONAL LIBERATION WAR (1940-1949)...........................126 1. MACEDONIANS IN THE NATIONAL LIBERATION WAR (1941-1945)................................................................................127 2. MACEDONIANS IN THE GREEK CIVIL WAR (1946-1949) ....................................................................................................134 CHAPTER SIX - MACEDONIANS AFTER THE GREEK CIVIL WAR (1949-1989) .........................................................................142 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LITERATURE.......................................150 5 PREFACE Historical determinism (the doctrine that everything, especially one’s choice of action, is determined by a sequence of causes independent of one’s will) affects negatively or positively the historical destiny of nations. European historical determinism in the Balkans has seriously influenced the Macedonian people’s historical destiny. In the history of the Macedonian people the “historic” period ended with the signing of the 1913 Treaty of Bucharest and the “prehistoric” period began. The negative Greek historical determinism severely harmed the Macedonian people’s historical destiny in Greek occupied Macedonia. With Greece’s appearance on the historical terrain of Greek occupied Macedonia, the Greek political historical determinism, with its exclusive Greek nationalism, put in question the Macedonian people’s biological existence. The Greek political factor began its genocidal policy against the Macedonian people in Greek occupied Macedonia with a Greek desire to create “one state with one nation”. The subject of this paper is in fact about the outcome of that desire which resulted in expulsions, oppression and assimilation of the Macedonian population, colonization of Macedonian lands with non- Macedonians (Greek and non-Greek), resistance against the affirmation of Macedonian national and cultural values, political mistreatment of the “Macedonian National Question” especially by the Communist Party of Greece (CPG), and other forms of mistreatment the Greek state applied against the Macedonian people living inside Greece. We should emphasize at this point that we ran into objective difficulties while researching our material for the book “Greek occupied Macedonia (1913-1989)”. The archives of the neighbouring countries which undoubtedly hold precious historical information (especially the Greek ones), and which would have allowed us access to comprehensive, purposeful and objective information on this issue, were inaccessible to us. 6 In the absence of archival information from the neighbouring countries, more attention was paid to published archival sources, especially the Macedonian archives, and other relevant historical literature. We strived, within the existing possibilities, to objectify the historical past of the Macedonian people from Greek occupied Macedonia, a people who, like no one else, suffered as much in peace as they did in wars... The author 7 CHAPTER ONE - NATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN GREEK OCCUPIED MACEDONIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE XX CENTURY (1900 - 1913) The population that lived in Greek occupied Macedonia was of varying ethnicities, church affiliations, and varied in numbers. There is extensive and diverse literature on its numbers and ethnicities. With a desire to justify their territorial claims on Macedonia, these
Recommended publications
  • The Making of Yugoslavia's People's Republic of Macedonia 377 Ward the Central Committee of the Yugoslav Communist Party Hardened

    The Making of Yugoslavia's People's Republic of Macedonia 377 Ward the Central Committee of the Yugoslav Communist Party Hardened

    THE MAKING OF YUGOSLAVIA’S PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Fifty years since the liberation of Macedonia, the perennial "Ma­ cedonian Question” appears to remain alive. While in Greece it has deF­ initely been settled, the establishment of a "Macedonian State” within the framework of the People’s Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has given a new form to the old controversy which has long divided the three Balkan States, particularly Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. The present study tries to recount the events which led to its founding, the purposes which prompted its establishment and the methods employed in bringing about the tasks for which it was conceived. The region of Southern Yugoslavia,' which extends south of a line traversed by the Shar Mountains and the hills just north of Skopje, has been known in the past under a variety of names, each one clearly denoting the owner and his policy concerning the region.3 The Turks considered it an integral part of their Ottoman Empire; the Serbs, who succeeded them, promptly incorporated it into their Kingdom of Serbs and Croats and viewed it as a purely Serbian land; the Bulgarians, who seized it during the Nazi occupation of the Balkans, grasped the long-sought opportunity to extend their administrative control and labeled it part of the Bulgarian Father- land. As of 1944, the region, which reverted to Yugoslavia, has been known as the People’s Republic of Macedonia, one of the six federative republics of communist Yugoslavia. The new name and administrative structure, exactly as the previous ones, was intended for the purpose of serving the aims of the new re­ gime.
  • Amendment to Registration Statement

    Amendment to Registration Statement

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 08/14/2020 3:22:34 PM OMB No. 1124-0003; Expires July 31, 2023 U.S. Department of Justice Amendment to Registration Statement Washington, dc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended INSTRUCTIONS. File this amendment form for any changes to a registration. Compliance is accomplished by filing an electronic amendment to registration statement and uploading any supporting documents at https://www.fara.gov. Privacy Act Statement. The filing of this document is required for the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq., for the purposes of registration under the Act and public disclosure. Provision of the information requested is mandatory, and failure to provide the information is subject to the penalty and enforcement provisions established in Section 8 of the Act. Every registration statement, short form registration statement, supplemental statement, exhibit, amendment, copy of informational materials or other document or information filed with the Attorney General under this Act is a public record open to public examination, inspection and copying during the posted business hours of the FARA Unit in Washington, DC. Statements are also available online at the FARA Unit’s webpage: https://www.fara.gov. One copy of eveiy such document, other than informational materials, is automatically provided to the Secretary of State pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, and copies of any and all documents are routinely made available to other agencies, departments and Congress pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act. The Attorney General also transmits a semi-annual report to Congress on the administration of the Act which lists the names of all agents registered under the Act and the foreign principals they represent.
  • An Introduction, Phonological, Morphological, Syntactic to The

    An Introduction, Phonological, Morphological, Syntactic to The

    AN INTRODUCTION, PHONOLOGICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL, SYNTACTIC, TO THE GOTHIC OF ULFILAS. BY T. LE MARCHANT DOUSE. LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 1886, PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, BED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. PREFACE. THIS book was originally designed to accompany an edition of Ulfilas for which I was collecting materials some eight or nine years ago, but which various con- siderations led me to lay aside. As, however, it had long seemed to me equally strange and deplorable that not a single work adapted to aid a student in acquiring a knowledge of Gothic was to be found in the English book-market, I pro- ceeded to give most of the time at my disposal to the " building up of this Introduction," on a somewhat larger scale than was at first intended, in the hope of being able to promote the study of a dialect which, apart from its native force and beauty, has special claims on the attention of more than one important class of students. By the student of linguistic science, indeed, these claims are at once admitted ; for the Gothic is one of the pillars on which rests the comparative grammar of the older both Indo-European languages in general, and also, pre-eminently, of the Teutonic cluster of dialects in particular. a But good knowledge of Gothic is scarcely less valuable to the student of the English language, at rate, of the Ancient or any English Anglo-Saxon ; upon the phonology of which, and indeed the whole grammar, the Gothic sheds a flood of light that is not to be got from any other source.
  • Dimitris Christopoulos Kostis Karpozilos

    Dimitris Christopoulos Kostis Karpozilos

    Dimitris Christopoulos Kostis Karpozilos 10+1 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS on the MACEDONIAN QUESTION 10+ 1 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ON THE MACEDONIAN QUESTION 10+1 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS on the MACEDONIAN QUESTION DIMITRIS CHRISTOPOULOS KOSTIS KARPOZILOS ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG OFFICE IN GREECE To all those Greek women and men who spoke out regarding the Macedonian Question in a documented and critical way in the decisive decade of the 1990s. For the women and men who stood up as citizens. CONTENTS Introduction to the English-language edition: The suspended step of the Prespa Agreement . 11 Introduction to the Greek-language edition: To get the conversation going . 19 1 . “ But isn’t the name of our neighbouring country a ‘national matter’ for Greece?” . 25 2 . “ Macedonia has been Greek since antiquity . How can some people appropriate all that history today?” . 31 3 . “ Isn’t there only one Macedonia and isn’t it Greek?” . 37 4 . “ But is there a Macedonian nation? Isn’t it nonexistent?” 41 5 . “ Okay, it’s not nonexistent . But it is artificial . Didn’t Tito create it?” . 49 6 . “ What is the relationship between the Greek left and the Macedonian question?” . 53 7 . “ Is there a Macedonian language?” . 59 8 . “ Are we placing Greece on the same level as a statelet, the statelet of Skopje?” . 65 9 . “ Their constitution is irredentist . Shouldn’t it be changed if we want to reach a compromise?” . 69 10 . “ So is it wrong to refer to that state as Skopje and its citizens as Skopjans?” . 77 10 + 1 . “So, is Greece not right?” . 83 Why did all this happen and what can be done about it today? .
  • CM(99)138 Addendum 2

    CM(99)138 Addendum 2

    COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L'EUROPE Committee of Ministers Ministers ' Deputies CM Documents 689Meeting, 24[-25] November 1999 6 Social and economic questions 6.1 European population committee (CDPO) The demographic characteristics of national minorities in certain European States The demographic characteristics of the main ethnic/national minorities in Bulgaria CM(99)138 Addendum(restricted) 2 27 October 1999 Internet : www.coe.fr/cmline (password access) Intranet : home/cmline Table of contents I. Historical and statistical overview....................................................................................3 1. Hi stori cal B ackground ..............................................................................................3 2. Historical Formation of the Major Ethnic/Minority groups ..................................4 3. Sources of Information and the Reliability of Statistical Data on Ethnic/ Minority Groups...................................................................................................... 6 4. Concepts and Definitions of Nationality and Ethnic/Minority Group ................ 10 5. International Conventions for Population Exchange ............................................11 H. The demographic situation of ethnic/minority groups...............................................13 1. Population Size and Growth .................................................................................. 13 2. Age and Sex Composition ......................................................................................18
  • Macedonia External Relations Briefing

    Macedonia External Relations Briefing

    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 6, No. 4 (MK) April 2018 Macedonia External Relations briefing: Macedonia’s Foreign Policy in 2018 Anastas Vangeli 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu Past and Present Attempts to Solve the Name Dispute Between Macedonia and Greece Introduction The key reason for the emergence of the asymmetrical name dispute is the fact that Greece treats the existence of Macedonia (a state that uses the name Macedonia and develops the concept of a non-Greek Macedonian nation, ethnicity, language, and culture) as a threat. Taking as pretext the turbulent history of the 20th century, Greece’s major objection has been that the Macedonian state is founded on a notion of irredentism. Therefore, Greece has used its leverage on the international stage, as a member of the EU, NATO and in general an established diplomatic tradition to make a change of the name of Macedonia a precondition for joining international organizations. The two parties have negotiated a possible solution under the auspices of the United Nations for almost quarter of a century. In the process they have come up with various solutions, both in terms of the legal circumstances, and the actual content of the name. In this brief, we analyze the various debates and the emergence of positions on the name issue, as well as some of the solutions that have been proposed throughout the years. Greece’s Position and Demands Starting from the premise that any usage of the term “Macedonia” to describe a non-Greek political entity is a threat towards Greece, the maximalist Greek position is that the new name of Macedonia should not contain the word “Macedonia” at all.
  • The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia

    The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia

    TheTruth about Greek Occupied Macedonia By Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Truth about Greek Occupied Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition January 7, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE – Struggle for our own School and Church .......8 1. Macedonian texts written with Greek letters .................................9 2. Educators and renaissance men from Southern Macedonia.........15 3. Kukush – Flag bearer of the educational struggle........................21 4. The movement in Meglen Region................................................33 5. Cultural enlightenment movement in Western Macedonia..........38 6. Macedonian and Bulgarian interests collide ................................41 CHAPTER TWO - Armed National Resistance ..........................47 1. The Negush Uprising ...................................................................47 2. Temporary Macedonian government ...........................................49
  • North Macedonia: 'New' Country Facing Old Problems

    North Macedonia: 'New' Country Facing Old Problems

    North Macedonia: ‘New’ country facing old problems A research on the name change of the Republic of North Macedonia Willem Posthumus – s4606027 Master Thesis Human Geography - Conflicts, Territories and Identities Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen Supervisor Henk van Houtum October 2019 36.989 words Once, from eastern ocean to western ocean, the land stretched away without names. Nameless headlands split the surf; nameless lakes reflected nameless mountains; and nameless rivers flowed through nameless valleys into nameless bays. G. R. Stewart, 1945, p. 3 2 I Preface After a bit more than a year, I can hereby present my master’s thesis. It’s about a name. Around 100 pages about a name: I could not have thought it would be such an extensive topic. Last year I had heard about Macedonia, or the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as it was often called. I didn’t know it that well, just that it used to be part of Yugoslavia, obviously. An item in the news, however, triggered my interest: the country was about to change its name to North Macedonia. ‘Why?’ I thought. I didn’t know about the name dispute, but the more I read about it, the more I wanted to know. When I had to choose a subject for my master’s thesis, I knew I would look at this name change. A year later, I think I understand the name change and the dispute better. Still, the topic is more complicated than I thought. Understanding everything there is about it would probably take a lot more time.
  • The Origin and Spread of Locative Determiner Omission in the Balkan Linguistic Area

    The Origin and Spread of Locative Determiner Omission in the Balkan Linguistic Area

    The Origin and Spread of Locative Determiner Omission in the Balkan Linguistic Area by Eric Heath Prendergast A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Line Mikkelsen, Chair Professor Lev Michael Professor Ronelle Alexander Spring 2017 The Origin and Spread of Locative Determiner Omission in the Balkan Linguistic Area Copyright 2017 by Eric Heath Prendergast 1 Abstract The Origin and Spread of Locative Determiner Omission in the Balkan Linguistic Area by Eric Heath Prendergast Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Line Mikkelsen, Chair This dissertation analyzes an unusual grammatical pattern that I call locative determiner omission, which is found in several languages belonging to the Slavic, Romance, and Albanian families, but which does not appear to have been directly inherited from any individual genetic ancestor of these languages. Locative determiner omission involves the omission of a definite article in the context of a locative prepositional phrase, and stands out as a feature of the Balkan linguistic area for which there are few, if any crosslinguistic parallels. This investigation of the origin and diachronic spread of locative determiner omission serves the particular goal of revealing how the social context of language contact could have resulted in a pattern of grammatical borrowing without lexical borrowing, yielding a present distribution in which locative determiner omission appears in several Balkan languages no longer in direct contact with one another. A detailed structural and historical analysis of locative determiner omission in Albanian, Romanian, Aromanian, and Macedonian is used as a basis for comparison with other Balkan languages.
  • RSL Hellenic Sub-Branch

    RSL Hellenic Sub-Branch

    RSL Hellenic Sub-Branch RETURNED SOLDIER – “APOSTRATOS” Memorial Hall, 14A Ferrars Place South Melbourne Vic 3205 Phone (03) 9699 9844 July 2016 Dear Veterans, Members and Friends of the RSL Hellenic Sub-Branch A warm welcome to all our new members that have joined our Sub-Branch, we hope to see you regularly at the club - Mr Bill Papageorgiou, Mr Nikolaos Bakaloumas, Mr Constantinos Sarantis, Mr Ilias Bakolias, Mrs Irene Poutselas, Mr George Charalambidis, Mr Chrys Kypreos, Mr Apostolos Dimitriou, Mr Gabriel Maroulis, Mr Ioakim Christodoulou, Mr Efterpi Kiritsopoulos and Mr Kostas Elisseou. Continued on page 2 His Excellency General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC greets Hellenic Sub Branch President Steve Kyritsis at the Commemoration of the 75th Anniversary Battle of Crete and Greek Campaign. To Steve’s left is Dr Robert Webster, Senior Vice President of the Victorian Branch of the RSL. To Steve’s right is Commander John Moller OAM (Retd) representing the State President of the Naval Association of Australia. Continued on page 7 1 Please email any newsletter content suggestions including photos you may have to Emanuel Karvelas at "[email protected]" Welcome from the President – Continued from page 1 In this edition of Apostratos, we focus on the Centenary of the Western Front, Fromelles (19th July), Pozieres (23rd July), Villers-Bretonneux and other disastrous 1916 WWI battles involving Australian forces of the 1st AIF. After the failure at Gallipoli, Australians moved with its Allies to fight the Axis Forces in France and Belgium. Almost 300,000 Australians served on the Western Front in France and Flanders, taking part in every major British offensive between 1916 and the Armistice in 1918.
  • Theodora Dragostinova

    Theodora Dragostinova

    Theodora Dragostinova Department of History Phone: 614-292-1602 The Ohio State University Fax: 614-292-8666 230 West 17th Avenue Email: [email protected] Columbus, OH 43210 ______________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D. in History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2000 M.A. in History, University of Florida 1998 B.A. in History and Archaeology, University of Athens, Greece 1993 Certificate, Modern Greek Language Center, University of Athens, Greece 1991 Undergraduate studies, Department of History, University of Sofia, Bulgaria, 1991-1992 ______________________________________________________________________________ POSITIONS 2018 Visiting Fellow, Center for Advanced Study, Sofia, Bulgaria 2015 Visiting Fellow, Institute for Southeast European Studies, Regensburg, Germany 2012~ Associate Professor of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 2007-2012 Assistant Professor of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 2006-2007 Visiting Assistant Professor of History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama ____________________________________________________________________________ PUBLICATIONS Monographs and Edited Volumes 2011 Between Two Motherlands: Nationality and Emigration among the Greeks of Bulgaria, 1900-1949 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011). Honorable mention, The Joseph Rothschild Prize in Nationalism and Ethnic Studies, Association for the Study of Nationalities and Harriman Institute, Columbia University . Honorable mention, The Edmund Keeley Book Prize, Modern Greek Studies Association . Past President Book Bronze Award, Association for Borderlands Studies Theodora Dragostinova Page 2 of 23 2016 Beyond Mosque, Church, and State: Alternative Narratives of the Nation in the Balkans (co-edited with Yana Hashamova) (New York & Budapest: Central European University Press, 2016). Refereed Journal Articles and Book Chapters 2018 “Introduction. Beyond the Iron Curtain: Eastern Europe and the Global Cold War,” Slavic Review, vol.
  • The Macedonian “Have” and “Be” Perfects

    The Macedonian “Have” and “Be” Perfects

    Chapter 4: Verbal Morphology The Macedonian “Have” and “Be” Perfects Olga Mišeska Tomić Macedonian is the only Slavic language with “have” perfects plus non-inflecting past participles that has reached what Heine and Kuteva would call “a fourth stage” of grammaticaliz­ation.1 Yet, alongside the “have” perfect, which developed as a result of language contact with non- Slavic Balkan languages, the “be” perfect inherited from Proto-Slavic, in which “be” auxiliaries combine with l-participles, is still being used in the language. Moreover, along with the “have” perfect plus invariable participles, a “be” perfect in which “be” auxiliaries com­bine with inflect- ing passive participles has been built up.2 Accordingly, there are three 1 Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva, The Changing Language of Europe (Ox- ford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 146. 2 These participles differ from­ the passive participles of other Slavic languag- es and Koneski and Friedm­an refer to them­ as “verbal adjectives,” while Lunt uses the term “-n/-t participles.” I stick to the term “passive participles” because they behave like the passive participles of many non-Slavic European languages (cf. 4.1 below). Blaže Koneski, Gramatika na makedonskiot literaturen jazik [Gram­m­ar of the Macedonian Literary Language] (Skopje: Kultura, 1967); Vic- tor Friedm­an, “The Typology of Balkan Evidentiality and Areal Linguistics,” in Olga Mišeska Tom­ić, ed., Balkan Syntax and Semantics (Amsterdam: John Benjam­ins, 2004), pp. 101–134; Horace G. Lunt, A Grammar of the Macedo- nian Literary Language (1952): Reprinted in Ljudm­il Spasov, Dve amerikanski gramatiki na sovremeniot makedonski standarden jazik (Skopje: Makedonska Akadem­ija na naukite i um­etnostite, 2003), pp.