DOCSLIB.ORG

O..O,,,,°,,,.,*O, ,.-O..°.-,*°,.°.-O°L°,O ".Oo°.°°°O%°.°.°°°°O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
O..O,,,,°,,,.,*O, ,.-O..°.-,*°,.°.-O°L°,O ".o°.,O..o,,,,°,,,.,*o, ,.-o..°.-,*°,.°.-o°l°,o ".Oo°.°°°o%°.°.°°°°o,- • ".' ' MSC-0017,1 o.. o... °°°o°°°°°.o°°°°° i!iii:!:::::::::::::i:! NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ::.. .... :" ".',°,,°.o%'°O°°oO,°., • .o .°°° .°°°°o,o .°O°.o° °°°o°,°o°°°°,,°°O.°o°°° :'F'"'"":.F'.'.:." .... o .... °° • °.°,.°.°,o°*°o.° • °°o °°.°..°o.,,°°°°°.°Oo°.* °°°°°.°.°°°°,°-°.°.°°°, °.°....o°°°o%°°o ,°° ° %% "°%°o'°°°°°°o°,o,, • .o..,o.°%°°°°°°.o°,° APOLLO 11 MISSION REPORT °o.°.,.°°.°°° o°.°-°, ° iii!iii!iii!iii!!!iiiil • oOo,°°°,°.°°°o °°° °o° i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:!:i:i .'°°o'°°o.,°°%°°°o°°°o .°,°°%°°,°Oo°°.°.°°°°, °.°°°°,°°°o ,%o° °°°,%°°°°%%%' ° • ° o°,°,°Oo°°%%* .:.:.:.:.:..-.:.:.:...."':.FF. '.'.'.'.'.'." i:i'i:i:i:i:i:::?!'i." :':.:::':::::':..'..:.: o',°°°°°°°,°°,,°,%%% .::'::F.F'.::'.'.'.'. °.,°°°,°,°°°°°°o°°.%o° ...... o.°°° -.FFFF-o-.;.F-.:." °o°-°°°°°o°°°°oO,°°°°°° ,°.o.° ..... .°°°..°°°°oO°°°°°o°°°,° ........ °°° F:.'.:-'.'.'.'.'.:.'." .F:.F'.'.'.:.'.:.'.'. F'..'.:.'.'.'.'.F'.:." °°..o°,.°°°°°°°°°,°o°°° %°,°°%,o°,°°°.,°%°°° o,°o ,,*o%-°°°°.o°°°*,° °°.°.,°°* ,.°°°°°°°,,,° -°..°°. °°°-°°°%°°°°°°- °°.°,°°,o°°°°°-o°oO,%° °°°o.°°,°°°°,,°°%%°°* o°°°°°°.,°°°,.°o°o°°°,o ,°- • °°,°O.,o-°, ,°o°o °.. °°,..o°.O,°,.,°°°o° .,°.OOO°°°°°°,%°°°°° • ..o°°,°°°°°° o,,°O°°o, ..°°.°,°°°,oO°*,.°°o°°° °..o,°,o°°.°°°°°.,°°°,, ........ °°. °°Oo°.Oo.,*o,o,°°o°°°°° -°°°.°°°°,-°°°o°o°°°.°° °°.°° ,o°°O°°°O°°o°°°°° • °° ° o.°°°o° o°°°°°o°°°°° .°,°.,°°o°-°.°°o%.°°°o • °. °°°°.°°-°-.o°°°°o°.O FFF:.:.;-:.;.F'.'." °*°o°°°,°°* .... °°°°.°,. v w :.;-'-:.F'.FFFFF: ,°,°° ...... o.°.o°°°°°°o°°°°°.°o°°° °.°°°°°°o°o°°°°,,°o°o°° N70-17401 °°°o°°°°°o-°,°o°%°o°.° °°°,*.°,%%%°,,o°°°°° • °°°,°°,°°.°°°°-°°°-°. IA¢¢l:lill IO N NUMIlKR! ....... ,,°,o UrHRU) °o°o°oo .... • °°*o°°°°°°°°°°°°°,°°° ,°°oo ..... *° °.**°'°°°'°°°'°°°°°%% .... °°o°.°° : PAG £ II ) / :.:-'"':'"F'"'":': °o°°° .... °° .,°°°.°°°°°° .o°°,°°o,*°°°-°,o°°°.°. °°°**,°°°oo o°° ,°°°,o°°.o°°°°°°o°° (NAIA _'R OR 'rMx OR A° NUMIIR) (CATI, eONy ) , "¢1 " *:]1 MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER :C ,1_. HOUSTON,TEXAS "-" "- NOVEMBER 1969 "0* • APOLLO SPACECRA/T FLIGHT HISTORY Launch site Mission S_acecraft Description Launch date White sands PA-I BP-6 First pad short Nov. 7, 1963 Missile Range, N. Mex. White Sands A-O01 BP-12 Transonic abort May 13, 1964 Missile Range, N. Mex. AS-101 BP-13 Nominal launch and May 28, 1964 Cape Kennedy, exit environment Fla • Cape Kenned," AS-I02 BP-15 Nominal launch and Sept. 18, 1964 J, exit environment Fla. A-O02 BP-23 Maximum dynamic Dec. 8, 1964 Whi_ Sands pressure abort Missile Range, N. Mex. AS -i03 BP-16 Micrometeoroid Feb. 16, 1965 Cape Kennedy, experiment Fla. A-O03 BP-22 Low-altitude abort May D, 1965 White Sands (planned high- Missile Range, altitude abort) N. Mex. AS-104 BP-26 Micrometeoroid May 25, 1965 Cape Kennedy, experiment md Fla. servicmmodule RCS launch environment BP-23A Second pad abort June 29, 1965 White Sands Missile Range, N. Mex. _ -_ 5 BP-9A Micrometeoroid July 30, 1965 Cape Kennedy, experiment and Fla. service module RCS launch environment A-O0h SC-002 Power-ont_bling Jan. 20, 1966 White Sands boundary_ort Missile Range, N. Mex. AS-201 sc-0o9 Supercircular Feb. 26, 1966 Cape Kennedy, entry with high Fla. heat rate AS-202 SC-011 Supercircular Aug. 25, 1966 Cape Kennedy, entry with high Fla. heat load (Continued inside back cover) MSC-00171 APOLLO ii MISSION REPORT PREPARED BY Mission Evaluation Team APPROVED BY George M. Low Manager, Apollo Spacecraft Program NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION MANNED SPACECRAFt CENTER HOUSTON, TEXAS November 1969 < "Houston, the Eagle has landecl." iii CONTENTS Section P age 1.0 S UMMARY ........................ i- i 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................... 2-1 3.0 MISSION DESCRIPTION ................... 3-1 4.0 PILOTS ' REPORT ..................... 4-1 4.1 PRELAUNCH ACTIVITIES .............. 4-i 4.2 LAUNCH ..................... 4-1 4.3 EARTH ORBIT COAST AND TRANSLUNAR INJECTION h-I 4.4 TRANSPOSITION AND DOCKING ............ 4-2 4.5 TRANSLUNAR COAST ................ 4-2 4.6 LUNAR ORBIT INSERTION .............. 4-3 4.7 LUNAR MODULE CHECKOUT .............. 4-4 4.8 DESCENT PREPARATION ............... 4-4 4.9 UNDOCKING AND SEPARATION ............ 4-7 4.10 LUNAR MODULE DESCENT .............. 4-7 4.11 COMMAND MODULE SOLO ACTIVITIES ......... 4-9 4.12 LUNAR SURFACE OPERATIONS ............ 4-10 4.13 LAUNCH PREPARATION ............... 4-16 4.14 ASCENT ..................... 4-17 4.15 RENDEZVODS ................... 4-17 4.]6 COMMAND MODULE DOCKING ............. 4-18 4.17 TRANSEARTH INJECTION .............. 4-19 4.18 TRANSEARTH COAST ................ 4-19 4.19 ENTRY ...................... 4-20 4.20 RECOVERY .................... 4-20 5.0 LUNAR DESCENT AND ASCENT ................ 5-1 5.1 DESCENT TRAJECTORY LOGIC ............ 5-i 5.2 PREPARATION FOR POWERED DESCENT ......... 5-2 5.3 POWERED DESCENT ................. 5-4 iv Sect i on Page 5.4 ,LANDING DYNAMICS ................ 5-6 5.5 POSTLANDING SPACECRAFT OPEP.ATIONS ........ 5-7 5.6 ASCENT ..................... 5-8 5.7 RENDEZVOUS • , , • • • ° , • • • . • , , . • , • 5-10 6.0 COMMUNI CATIONS ..................... 6-1 7.0 TRAJECTORY ....................... 7-1 7. i LAUNCH PHASE .................. 7-1 7.2 EARTH PARKING ORBIT ............... 7-1 7.3 TRANSLUNAR INJECTION .............. 7-1 7.4 MANEUVER ANALYSIS ................ 7-2 7.5 COMMAND MODULE ENTRY .............. 7-4 7.6 SERVICE MODULE ENTRY .............. 7-5 7.7 LUNAR ORBIT TARGETING .............. 7-5 7.8 LUNAR ORBIT NAVIGATION ............. 7-6 8.0 COMM_D AND SERVICE MODULE PERFORMANCE ......... 8-1 8.1 STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ........ 8-1 8.2 ELECTRICAL POWER ................ 8-4 8.3 CRYOGENIC STORAGE ................ 8-5 8.4 %_F RANGING ................... 8-5 8.5 INSTRUMENTATION ................. 8-5 8.6 GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL ........ 8-6 8.7 REACTION CONTROL ................ 8-19 8.8 SERVICE PROPULSION ............... 8-19 8.9 ENVIRONM:3NTAL CONTROL SYSTEM .......... 8-23 8. i0 CREW STATION .................. 8-24 8. ii CONSUMABLES ................... 8-25 9.0 LUNAR MODUI_ PERFORMANCE ................ 9-1 9.1 STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ........ 9-1 9.2 THERMAL CONTROL ................. 9-1 9.3 ELECTRICAL POWER ................ 9-2 v Section Page 9.4 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ............ 9-2 9.5 INSTRUMENTATION ................. 9-3 9.6 GUIDANCE AND CONTROL .............. 9-3 9.7 REACTION CONTROL ................ 9-19 9.8 DESCENT PROF_LSION ............... 9-22 9.9 ASCENT PROPULSION ................ 9-27 9.10 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM .......... 9-29 9. ii RADAR ...................... 9-29 9.12 CREW STATION .................. 9-30 9.13 CONSUMABLES ................... 9-30 i0.0 EXTRAVEHICULAR MOBILITY UNIT PERFORMANCE ........ i0-i ii.0 THE LUNAR SURFACE .................... ii-i ii.i LUNAR GEOLOGY EXPERIMENT ............ 11-3 11.2 LUNAR SURFACE MECHANICS EXPERIMENT ....... 11-12 11.3 EXAMINATION OF LUNAR SAMPLES .......... 11-14 ii. 4 PASSIVE SEISMIC EXPERIMENT ........... 11-17 Ii. 5 LASER RANGING RETRO-REFLECTOR EXPERIMENT .... 11-22 11.6 SOLAR WIND COMPOSITION EXPERIMENT ........ 11-23 ii. 7 PHOTOGR___HY ................... 11-23 12.0 BIOMEDICAL EVALUATION .................. 12-1 12.1 BIOINSTRUMENTATION AND PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA .... 12-1 12.2 MEDICAL OBSERVATIONS .............. 12-2 12.3 EXTRAVEHICUL&R ACTIVITY ............. 12-5 12.4 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS .............. 12-5 12.5 LUNAR CONTAMINATION AND QUARANTINE ....... 12-6 13.0 MISSION ST/PPORT PERFORMANCE ............... 13-1 13.1 FLIGHT CONTROL ................. 13-1 13.2 NETWORK PERFORMANCE ............... 13-2 13.3 RECOVERY OPERATIONS ............... 13-3 vi Section Page 14.0 ASSESSMENT OF MISSION OBJECTIVES ............ 14-1 14.1 LOCATION OF LANDED LUNAR MODULE ......... 14-1 14.2 LUNAR FIELD GEOLOGY ............... 14-2 15.0 LAUNCH VEHICLE SUMMARY ................. 15-1 16.0 ANOMALY SUMMARY ..................... 16-1 16.1 COMMAND AND SERVICE MODULES ........... 16-1 16.2 LUNAR MODULE .................. 16-9 16.3 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED EQUIPMENT ......... 16-21 17.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................... 17-1 APPENDIX A - VEHICLE DESCRIPTIONS ............... A-I A.I COMMAND AND SERVICE MODULES ........... A-I A. 2 LUNAR, MODULE .................. A-I A. 3 EXTRAVEHICULAR MOBILITY UNIT .......... A-5 A. 4 EXPERIMENT EQblPMENT .............. A-8 A.5 LAUNCH VEHICLE ................. A-10 A. 6 MASS PROPERTIES ................. A-10 APPENDIX B - SPACECRAFT HISTORIES ............... B-I APPENDIX C - POSTFLIGHT TESTING ..... ........... C-I APPENDIX D - DATA AVAILABILITY ................. D-I APPENDIX E - GLOSSARY ..................... E-I vii SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS A ampere ac alternating current AGS abort guidance system A-h ampere -hour ALDS Apollo launch data system arc sec arc second ARIA Apollo range instrumentation aircraft BDA Bermuda Btu British thermal unit CAPCOM capsule communicator CATS command and telemetry system c.d.t. central daylight time cm cent imet er CMC command module computer CR0 Carnarvon, Australia CSM command and service modules CYI Canary Islands D down dB decibel (also used as dBm) dc direct current deg degree D/T delayed time E east e.s .t. eastern standard time FM frequency modulat ion _/sec feet per second g gravity of earth C-&N guidance and navigation GDS Goldstone, California G.m.t. Greenwich mean time - - ' -- nn_ _ uJ I III-- _ nml viii HAW IIawaii hr hour HSK Honeysuckle, Australia Hz hertz I inertia in-lb inch-pound kpps kilopulses per second kW-h ki lowat t -h our ib/hr pounds per hour lb/_
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nasa Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Oral History 2 Transcript
    NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT ORAL HISTORY 2 TRANSCRIPT FREDERICK H. HAUCK INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER ROSS-NAZZAL BETHESDA, MARYLAND – 17 MARCH 2004 th ROSS-NAZZAL: Today is March 17 , 2004. This oral history with Rick Hauck is being conducted in Bethesda, Maryland, for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. The interviewer is Jennifer Ross-Nazzal. Thank you for meeting with me again today. I know your schedule is busy. HAUCK: Thank you. On St. Paddy’s Day, my father’s mother, Florence Fogerty, would be pleased to know that we’re doing this on St. Paddy’s Day, if she were still with us. ROSS-NAZZAL: Thank you. We appreciate it. I wanted to ask you, in the last interview when we spoke, you mentioned that you were actually told by George [W. S.] Abbey and [Richard H.] Dick Truly that you were going to command the return-to-flight mission, but you were told that you couldn’t actually tell anyone this information. What was your reaction when you heard this? HAUCK: Well, I was absolutely thrilled that I was entrusted with that mission. I think every member of the Astronaut Office, probably without exception, wanted to be on that flight, so I was thrilled with it. The fact that I couldn’t tell people about it or speak about it publicly, any concerns about that were dwarfed by the enthusiasm that I had, knowing that this gift was in my pocket now. I knew that, of course, until something’s announced, it can be changed, and so that 17 March 2004 1 Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Frederick H.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of S.P
    ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Redistributions and the Russian Peasant Commune in the Late-Imperial Period
    Land Redistributions and the Russian Peasant Commune in the Late-Imperial Period Steven Nafziger1 Preliminary and Incomplete Comments welcome and encouraged. Version: December, 2004 1Department of Economics, Yale University, [email protected]. This paper forms part of a larger project on the economics of rural development in Russia between 1861 and 1917. Research for this project was supported in part by the Title VIII Combined Research and Language Training Program, which is funded by the U.S. State Department and admin- istered by the American Councils for International Education: ACTR/ACCELS. The opinions expressed herein are the author’s and do not necessarily express the views of either the State Department or American Councils. Further support from the Economic History Association, the Sasakawa Foundation, Yale’s Economic Growth Center, and the Yale Center for Interna- tional and Area Studies is very much appreciated. The comments and suggestions of Tracy Dennison, Daniel Field, Timothy Guinnane, Mark Harrison, Valery Lazarev, Carol Leonard, Jason Long, Angela Micah, Carolyn Moehling, Benjamin Polak, Christopher Udry, and partic- ipants at the 2004 World Cliometric Congress, the 2004 Economic History Association meet- ings, and seminars at Yale and Harvard Universities were extremely helpful. Errors remain the exclusive property of the author. Abstract This paper investigates the motivations for, and effects of, intra-community land re- distributions by Russian peasants in the 19th century. Scholars such as Alexander Gerschenkron have emphasized that such repartitions of arable land create negative investment and innovation incentives and played a major role in hampering rural de- velopment in the period after serfdom.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST INTERKATIONAL MANNED SPACE FLIGHT July 15-24, 1975
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) , . -­I ...., ... I H I APOLLO SOYUZ TEST PROJECT FIRST INTERKATIONAL MANNED SPACE FLIGHT July 15- 24 , 1975 P ' Ul Ul ... Q u '" The Crews Apollo Command er -- Thomas P. Stafford, Maj. Gen. USAF ~; Command ~odule Pilot -- Vance D. Brand w Docking Module Pilot -- Donald K. Slayton ~ ~ w Soyuz Commander Alexey A. Leonoy, Brig. Gen. Soviet Air Forc€: Flight Engineer Valeriy N. Kubasov Mi ssion Th "'ation -- Nine days, eight hours, 18 minutes from Soyuz launch to Apollo l .mding - 1 - Objecti~ of Mission The Apollo Soyuz Test Pro.;oct mission was planned to accomplish spacecraft rendezvous, docking, undocking, crew transfer, interaction of control centers, and interaction of s pac e cra~ crews. ThE! development of the compatible docking systems en­ hances the safety of manned flights in spa ce and provides the opportunity for conducting joint experiments in the future .
    [Show full text]
  • Dartmouth Conf Program
    The Dartmouth Conference: The First 50 Years 1960—2010 Reminiscing on the Dartmouth Conference by Yevgeny Primakov T THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, and facilitating conditions conducive to A the Dartmouth Conference was one of economic interaction. the few diversions from the spirit of hostility The significance of the Dartmouth Confer- available to Soviet and American intellectuals, ence relates to the fact that throughout the who were keen, and able, to explore peace- cold war, no formal Soviet-American contact making initiatives. In fact, the Dartmouth had been consistently maintained, and that participants reported to huge gap was bridged by Moscow and Washington these meetings. on the progress of their The composition of discussion and, from participants was a pri- time to time, were even mary factor in the success instructed to “test the of those meetings, and it water” regarding ideas took some time before the put forward by their gov- negotiating teams were ernments. The Dartmouth shaped the right way. At meetings were also used first, in the early 1970s, to unfetter actions under- the teams had been led taken by the two countries by professionally quali- from a propagandist connotation and present fied citizens. From the Soviet Union, political them in a more genuine perspective. But the experts and researchers working for the Insti- crucial mission for these meetings was to tute of World Economy and International establish areas of concurring interests and to Relations and the Institute of U.S. and Cana- attempt to outline mutually acceptable solutions dian Studies, organizations closely linked to to the most acute problems: nuclear weapons Soviet policymaking circles, played key roles.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Human Spaceflight Symposium 2020
    IAF Human Spaceflight Symposium 2020 Held at the 71st International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2020) Online 12 - 14 October 2020 ISBN: 978-1-7138-2540-1 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2020) by International Astronautical Federation All rights reserved. Printed with permission by Curran Associates, Inc. (2021) For permission requests, please contact International Astronautical Federation at the address below. International Astronautical Federation 100 Avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris France Phone: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 www.iafastro.org Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS GOVERNMENTAL HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAMMES (OVERVIEW) KEYNOTE: INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS IN HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION ................................... 1 Kathy Lueders, Ruth Siboni KEYNOTE: HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT WITHIN ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION PROGRAMME FOR THE NEXT DECADE ...................................................................................................... 2 David Parker, Bernhard Hufenbach UAE ASTRONAUTS PROGRAMME ZAYED AMBITION MISSION ONE TO THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Books Spring 2021 Bestselling Titles Worldwide Bestselling Titles for 2019/2020
    BOOKS SPRING 2021 BESTSELLING TITLES WORLDWIDE BESTSELLING TITLES FOR 2019/2020 Published in Published in Rolex 1 April 2020 2 September 2020 The Stylish Life Skiing 34.476 copies Rolex (including previous editions) 23.802 copies Nordic Islands New Extended Edition ISBN 978-3-96171-323-3 ISBN 978-3-8327-3266-0 ISBN 978-3-96171-255-7 ISBN 978-3-96171-323-3 ONLY AVAILABLE IN 9 783961 713233 NORTH AMERICA 9 783961 712557 9 783961 713233 Published in Published in 3 March 2020 4 February 2019 Born to Ice Apollo VII-XVII 20.180 copies 19.514 copies Chicken The Cow ISBN 978-3-96171-123-9 ISBN 978-3-96171-132-1 ISBN 978-3-96171-261-8 ISBN 978-3-96171-184-0 9 783961 711239 9 783961 711321 9 783961 712618 9 783961 711840 NEWCOMER Published in Published in Dogs 5 April 2020 September 2020. nd Diamonds & Pearls Small Flexicover Edition Already in 2 edition! 14.350 copies 14.053 copies Lost Wheels Cities of Silence ISBN 978-3-8327-9705-8 ISBN 978-3-8327-6924-6 ISBN 978-3-96171-258-8 ISBN 978-3-96171-320-2 9 783832 797058 9 783832 769246 9 783961 712588 9 783961 713202 Information on our bestsellers marked with ! and ! can 9be783961 found in 710003the backlist starting on page 64. 1 CONTENTS TENEUES BOOKS SPRING 2021 A TRIBUTE TO MOTHER EARTH | Marsel van Oosten 4 MOUNTAIN ESCAPES | Martin N. Kunz 6 VULNERABLE | Olga Michi 8 LAST OF THEIR KIND | Joachim Schmeisser 10 METROPOLITAN LUXURY | Eric Kuster 12 ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN REVIEW 14 THE WATCH BOOK – MORE THAN TIME | Gisbert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
    --.I m ...ir,,.= The document_-contains materials on the Soyuz-Apollo test and consists of two parts, prepared by the USSR and USA sides res- pectively. Both parts outline the purposes and program of the mission, the spacecraft design, the flight plan and information on Joint and unilateral scientific experiments. Brief biographies of the cosmonauts and astronauts, the Joint mission crew members_ are also presented. The document covers technical support activities providing mission control and gives information about the ASTP Soviet and American leaders. As the USSR and USA parts of the document have been prepared independently, there might be duplication in the sections dealing with the Joint activities. The document is intended for press representatives and various mass information means. CONTENTS Page I.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 10 1.1 Background ......................................... I0 1,2 Apollo-Soyuz joint test project objectives .......... 13 2.0 COMPATIBILITY PROBLEMS ................... ......... • 15 2.1 Spacecraft compatibility conditions and principal solutions accepted for Apollo-Ssyuz Test Mission .... 15 2.2 Compatibility of ground flight control personnel ... 18 2_3 Methodological compatibility ....................... 20 3.0 SOYUZ SPACECRAFT ................................... 22 3.1 PurPose. Brief data on Soyuz spacecraft flights .... 22 3.2 Soyuz spacecraft description ....................... 25 3.2.1 General description of the Soyuz spacecraft.. 25 Main characteristics ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Son~ Biographical Details
    CO!vlMISSION VI VWRKING GROUP 2 K.B.Atkinson Department of Photogramme+.ry anc1. .3urveyiug University College London F. V. TH01:.PSON ( 1880 - 1917): A P181mER 0£ PHOTOGRA..\ll:ETRY Frederick Vivian Thompson was bo~n on 26th April, 1880. Ee received a commission in the Soyal Engineers in 1898 and his subsequent army career included appointments as Instructor in Photoeraphy at the School of l· ..:ili t&.ry :::~ngineering, Chatham and as Officer for '1'echnical Duties 2.t the School of :c:usketry, Hythe .. Between 1904 and the outbreak of the First ~orld ~ar, he was responsible for a number of inventions j ncluclins the desiR:ns of tv1o ;.Jhotopran·:rr.etri·c plott:i.n:-:- instrucents a.::::ociated ·:lith U:e needs of topo~raphic mapping. Eis Stereo-plotter of 1907 predated von Orel's solution. Pis Stereo-planigraph of 1908 was the first desipn for a fully automatic and rirorous instrument. ether inventions are chiefly concerned with simple surveying instruments, range finding and rifle target practice .. Thompson died of wounds received in action in October 1917. Little is known of his technical achievements and even less, beyond his. fe.mily circle, of his other interests and accomplish­ ments. Access to unpublished papers held by the Royal Engineers Museum and discussions with Lt.-Col.J.R.V.Thorr~son, the son of Vivian Thompson, have enabled this author to asserr1ble a fi ttinc tribute to a pioneer of photocrarr~etry. The centenary of Thompson's birth is seen as an appropriate opportunity to bring his contri­ butions to the notice of a wider audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2016 and Independent Auditor’S Report DETSKY MIR GROUP
    DETSKY MIR GROUP Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended 31 December 2016 And Independent Auditor’s Report DETSKY MIR GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016 1 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 2-6 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 7 Consolidated statement of financial position 8 Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity 9 Consolidated statement of cash flows 10 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 11-47 DETSKY MIR GROUP STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016 Management is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that present fairly the financial position of PJSC “Detsky mir” (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) as of 31 December 2016, and the results of its operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the year then ended, in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for: Properly selecting and applying accounting policies; Presenting information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; Providing additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the Group’s consolidated financial position and financial performance; Making an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Project Foreword
    APOLLO -SOYUZ TEST PROJECT FOREWORD The document oontainsaontaina materials on the Soyuz-Apollo teettest and consists of two parts, prepared by the USSR and USA sides res-res­ peotive1y.peatively, Both partsparta outline the purposes and program of the miseion,mission, the spacecraft design, the flight plan and information anon jointjoint and unilateral scientific experiments.experiments, Brief biographies of the cosmonauts and a~tronauta,astronauts, the jointjoint mission crew members,member@, are also presented*presented. The document covers technical support activities providing rnia~ionmission control and gives informationinfomation about the ASTP Soviet and American leaders,leaders. AsAa the USSR and USA parts of the document have been prepared b independently,independently, there might be duplication Inin the section8sections dealing with the joint activities.activities, The documentdocwnent is intended for press representatfve~representatives and various massmas information means.means, CONCONTENTSTEN TS Page 1.01.0 INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION .......................................ill •••••••••••••••• 10 1,.1.11 BackgroundBackground ..."" ...................................a....,. .. III ••••••••• .. • • •••••• .. • .. ••• • 10 1.21.2 Apollo-SoyuzApollo-Soyuz jointjointtestprojectobjectiveaaee.~~test project objectives............ 1313 2.02.0 COMPATIBILITYCOMPATIBILITY PROBLEMSPROBLEMS ..•.............................0.0 .... 0.................. 1515 2.12.1 SpacecraftSpacecraft compatibilitycompatibility condiconditionstions andand
    [Show full text]
  • Musique Et Camps De Concentration
    Colloque « MusiqueColloque et « campsMusique de concentration »et camps de Conseilconcentration de l’Europe - 7 et 8 novembre » 2013 dans le cadre du programme « Transmission de la mémoire de l’Holocauste et prévention des crimes contre l’humanité » Conseil de l’Europe - 7 et 8 novembre 2013 Éditions du Forum Voix Etouffées en partenariat avec le Conseil de l’Europe 1 Musique et camps de concentration Éditeur : Amaury du Closel Co-éditeur : Conseil de l’Europe Contributeurs : Amaury du Closel Francesco Lotoro Dr. Milijana Pavlovic Dr. Katarzyna Naliwajek-Mazurek Ronald Leopoldi Dr. Suzanne Snizek Dr. Inna Klause Daniel Elphick Dr. David Fligg Dr. h.c. Philippe Olivier Lloica Czackis Dr. Edward Hafer Jory Debenham Dr. Katia Chornik Les vues exprimées dans cet ouvrage sont de la responsabilité des auteurs et ne reflètent pas nécessairement la ligne officielle du Conseil de l’Europe. 2 Sommaire Amaury du Closel : Introduction 4 Francesco Lotoro : Searching for Lost Music 6 Dr Milijana Pavlovic : Alma Rosé and the Lagerkapelle Auschwitz 22 Dr Katarzyna Naliwajek–Mazurek : Music within the Nazi Genocide System in Occupied Poland: Facts and Testimonies 38 Ronald Leopoldi : Hermann Leopoldi et l’Hymne de Buchenwald 49 Dr Suzanne Snizek : Interned musicians 53 Dr Inna Klause : Musicocultural Behaviour of Gulag prisoners from the 1920s to 1950s 74 Daniel Elphick : Mieczyslaw Weinberg: Lines that have escaped destruction 97 Dr David Fligg : Positioning Gideon Klein 114 Dr. h.c. Philippe Olivier : La vie musicale dans le Ghetto de Vilne : un essai
    [Show full text]