DOCSLIB.ORG

STRATEGIC CHOICES for a TURBULENT WORLD in Pursuit of Security and Opportunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STRATEGIC CHOICES for a TURBULENT WORLD in Pursuit of Security and Opportunity STRATEGIC RETHINK STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR A TURBULENT WORLD In Pursuit of Security and Opportunity Andrew R. Hoehn | Richard H. Solomon | Sonni Efron Frank Camm | Anita Chandra | Debra Knopman | Burgess Laird C O R P O R A T I O N Robert J. Lempert | Howard J. Shatz | Casimir Yost For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1631 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9692-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover design by Pete Soriano Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This is the sixth and final volume in the RAND Strategic Rethink project. This series has developed conceptual perspectives on how U.S. thinking, institutions, and policies must adapt to the many changes in the international environment. Together, these studies help clarify the strategic choices facing the country in 2017 and beyond. The first volume, anchored by Ambassador James Dobbins, out- lines the foreign policy choices that U.S. policymakers now face in three critical regions—the Middle East, Europe, and Asia—as well as on such problems as counterterrorism, climate change, and cybersecurity. The second study, on national defense, by David Ochmanek and Andrew Hoehn, demonstrates that the United States suffers a “security deficit” between its stated military strategy and the resources allocated to its defense posture. It outlines what Americans can expect for their defense dollars at four different levels of spending, all of them lower than historic norms. And it argues that the United States must either spend more on its defenses or reduce its global security ambitions. The third volume, by Hans Binnendijk, assesses the state of U.S. alliances and partnerships, exploring three alternative strategies for managing potential adversaries. It concludes that collaborative engagement, though not without constraints, is the most feasible for the United States. It also recommends a trilateral defense strategy that would feature closer ties among the United States, Europe, and Asia. The fourth, a Perspective by Ambassador Charles P. Ries, probes the deficiencies in the U.S. national security policymaking and policy implementation systems, offering eight recommendations for reorga- iii iv Strategic Choices for a Turbulent World: In Pursuit of Security and Opportunity nizing and improving decisionmaking in an era of rising challenges and shrinking policymaker bandwidth. The fifth, an assessment of the international economy by Howard J. Shatz, concludes that the United States is likely to maintain the world’s largest economy for many years, and that it will benefit from continuing its leadership role in the international institutions it helped to build over the past seven decades. The report argues that the United States should improve these global structures and integrate rising powers, demonstrating to other countries that a U.S.-led economic system remains desirable. We draw on the research and insights of these five associated studies in this concluding volume, as well as contributions from other RAND colleagues across a range of disciplines. This study should be of interest to U.S. policymakers and law- makers, analysts, the media, nongovernmental organizations, and others concerned with the role of the United States and other nations in advancing global security and economic growth. This project results from the RAND Corporation’s Investment in People and Ideas program. Support for this program is provided, in part, by the generosity of RAND’s donors and by the fees earned on client-funded research. Special appreciation is due to the Hauser Foundation for its gen- erous gifts in support of the project, and to Rita Hauser for her encour- agement and support of the effort. Preface v The RAND Strategic Rethink Series Available at www.rand.org/research/projects/strategic-rethink Choices for America in a Turbulent World James Dobbins, Richard H. Solomon, Michael S. Chase, Ryan Henry, F. Stephen Larrabee, Robert J. Lempert, Andrew Liepman, Jeffrey Martini, David Ochmanek, and Howard J. Shatz RR-1114-RC, 2015 America’s Security Deficit: Addressing the Imbalance Between Strategy and Resources in a Turbulent World David Ochmanek, Andrew R. Hoehn, James T. Quinlivan, Seth G. Jones, and Edward L. Warner RR-1223-RC, 2015 Friends, Foes, and Future Directions: U.S. Partnerships in a Turbulent World Hans Binnendijk RR-1210-RC, 2016 Improving Decisionmaking in a Turbulent World Charles P. Ries PE-192-RC, 2016 U.S. International Economic Strategy in a Turbulent World Howard J. Shatz RR-1521-RC, 2016 Foreword This is the sixth and final volume of the Strategic Rethink series, during which RAND has pulled together some of its best minds to take a fresh look at America’s role in the world—its interests, ambitions, obstacles, and options for a turbulent new era. The project was born several years ago, at a moment when both the international security situation and the U.S. domestic political mood seemed to be deteriorating sharply. We had war fatigue at home, tumult in the Middle East, increasing tensions with Russia and China, a Salafi-jihadist movement taking root in new lands, and a rising tide of partisanship threatening to paralyze the U.S. ability to conduct a sustained, coherent foreign policy. I asked Ambassadors Richard Solo- mon and James Dobbins to lead a wide-ranging effort to reexamine America’s challenges and its capabilities. What level of international engagement is the American public willing to support, and to what end? How much does America want or need to lead a world where many problems seem to be beyond its ability to control? Is there a “grand strategy” for diplomacy and defense that would match U.S. interests with the resources required to succeed at that strategy? And if not a “grand” strategy, are there other strategic concepts that could align and orient U.S. foreign and domestic policy and generate support from the American public? The five previous volumes in this series explored key issues that will face the next president in the Middle East, Europe, and Asia; national defense; alliances and partnerships; national security deci- sionmaking; and international economic policy. This final overview vii viii Strategic Choices for a Turbulent World: In Pursuit of Security and Opportunity report analyzes how the United States moved from the triumph at the end of the Cold War to the stalemate of today and suggests a range of changes the United States can make to better adapt to this new era of turbulence and uncertainty. The report offers three plausible strategic concepts that the United States might pursue, and evaluates the under- lying assumptions, costs, risks, and constraints. It also offers thoughts on how to choose among alternatives. We do not advocate any one of these strategic concepts. In fact, we assume that policymakers will mix and match as they strive to cope with fast-evolving circumstances and advance changing U.S. inter- ests. As this report points out, changes in course even during a single administration tend to be the rule rather than the exception. I would offer five considerations for readers as they use this volume to explore, challenge, and develop their own views of America’s role in the world. First, I am deeply concerned that the United States has contracted a disease we might call “truth decay.” In politics and beyond, we see the danger that Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan once warned of, that people feel entitled not only to their opinions, but to their own set of facts to support those opinions. One goal of the Strategic Rethink series has been to present a rigorous body of facts and analysis on which to have a productive discussion about strategic choices for America. Second, American voters don’t always get what we pay for, but we almost never get what we don’t pay for. Each strategic concept in this report comes with an approximate price tag for defense and security spending. Failure to allocate proper resources to a chosen course of action is a recipe for disappointment, debt, or disaster. Third, much has been written about the limitations on U.S. power, but the authors caution that inaction on the global stage can sometimes be just as costly as action. A careful calibration of ends and means is always a necessity. Fourth, the analysis highlights the many strengths the United States brings to bear on the global stage, more than any other nation, and none more important than its many friends and allies. No other competitor has the advantage of such a global network of friends and Foreword ix allies; to surrender or squander this advantage would be a catastrophic strategic failure. Finally, this report analyzes many external threats to the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Beginner's Guide to Nation-Building
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Praise for The Beginner’s Guide to Nation-Building No challenge in international relations today is more pressing or more difficult than that of supporting weak states. James Dob- bins, one of the leading practitioners of the art, offers a set of clear, simple prescriptions for helping to build a stable peace in the wake of conflict and disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, DC June 1, 2016 Dear Mr. President, We Are Writing, As
    Washington, DC June 1, 2016 Dear Mr. President, We are writing, as Americans committed to the success of our country’s Afghanistan mission, to urge that you sustain the current level of U.S. forces in Afghanistan through the remainder of your term. Aid levels and diplomatic energies should similarly be preserved without reduction. Unless emergency conditions require consideration of a modest increase, we would strongly favor a freeze at the level of roughly 10,000 U.S. troops through January 20. This approach would also allow your successor to assess the situation for herself or himself and make further adjustments accordingly. The broader Middle East is roiled in conflicts that pit moderate and progressive forces against those of violent extremists. As we saw on 9/11 and in the recent attacks in Paris, San Bernardino, and Brussels, the problems of the Middle East do not remain contained within the Middle East. Afghanistan is the place where al Qaeda and affiliates first planned the 9/11 attacks and a place where they continue to operate—and is thus important in the broader effort to defeat the global extremist movement today. It is a place where al Qaeda and ISIS still have modest footprints that could be expanded if a security vacuum developed. If Afghanistan were to revert to the chaos of the 1990s, millions of refugees would again seek shelter in neighboring countries and overseas, dramatically intensifying the severe challenges already faced in Europe and beyond. In the long-term struggle against violent extremists, the United States above all needs allies—not only to fight a common enemy, but also to create a positive vision for the peoples of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking to the Taliban 2011 – 2012: a Reflection
    Talking to the Taliban 2011 – 2012: A Reflection BY MARC GROSSMAN hen then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked in early 2011 if I would become the United States’ Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan (SRAP) – after the W sudden death of Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, the first SRAP – she described the foundations Ambassador Holbrooke had laid to manage one of the most challenging tasks facing the nation. Secretary Clinton also said that she wanted to continue the experiment: having the SRAP organization prove that the “whole-of-government” philosophy – the idea that the United States must employ expertise and resources from all relevant parts of government to address the nation’s most important challenges – was the right model for 21st century diplomacy.2 The SRAP team brought together experts from across the U.S. Government (and included several diplomats from NATO countries) to develop and implement integrated strategies to address the complex challenges in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the region. Among the first things I learned when I arrived at my desk in February 2011, was that an allied government had put the United States in contact with someone who seemed to be an empowered representative of the Taliban, the Afghan insurgent group which the United States had removed from power in 2001, but which had ever since kept up a deadly war against Afghans, Americans and our allies, friends and partners.3 The contact was preliminary, but many in the White House and on the SRAP team hoped that this connection might open the door for the conversation everyone knew would be required if there were ever to be peace in Afghanistan: Afghans talking to other Afghans about the future of Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Vol. 2 No 3
    PRISM❖ Vol. 2, no. 3 06/2011 PRISM Vol. 2, no. 3 2, no. Vol. ❖ 06/2011 www.ndu.edu A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM ABOUT CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS (CCO) CCO WAS ESTABLISHED TO: PRISM is published by the National Defense University Press for the Center for ❖❖ Serve as an information clearinghouse and knowledge Enhancing the U.S. Government’s Ability to manager for complex operations training and education, PUBLISHER Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex and Prepare for Complex Operations acting as a central repository for information on areas Dr. Hans Binnendijk integrated national security operations; reconstruction and nation-building; such as training and curricula, training and education pro- CCO, a center within the Institute for National Strategic relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and vider institutions, complex operations events, and subject EDITOR AND RESEARCH DIRECTOR Studies at National Defense University, links U.S. education to transform America’s security and development apparatus to meet matter experts Government education and training institutions, including Michael Miklaucic tomorrow’s challenges better while promoting freedom today. related centers of excellence, lessons learned programs, ❖❖ Develop a complex operations training and education com- and academia, to foster unity of effort in reconstruction munity of practice to catalyze innovation and development DEVELOPMENTAL EDITOR and stability operations, counterinsurgency, and irregular of new knowledge, connect members for networking, share Melanne A. Civic, Esq. COMMUNICATIONS warfare—collectively called “complex operations.” existing knowledge, and cultivate foundations of trust and The Department of Defense, with support from the habits of collaboration across the community Constructive comments and contributions are important to us.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand?
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 2021 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand? September 2021 Volume 98, No. 7 Focus on 9/11, Twenty Years Later 22 Getting Off the X In a compelling personal account of the 9/11 attacks, one FSO offers tactics for surviving when catastrophe strikes. By Nancy Ostrowski 26 The Global War on Terror and Diplomatic Practice The war on terror fundamentally changed U.S. diplomacy, leaving a trail 39 of collateral damage to America’s readiness for future challenges. Intervention: FS Know-How By Larry Butler Unlearned Lessons, or the Gripes of a Professional 46 31 The State Department’s failure to Whistleblower effectively staff and run interventions Protections: America and 9/11: has a long history. Four critical A Nonpartisan The Real-World Impact of lessons can be drawn from the post-9/11 experience. Necessity Terrorism and Extremism As old as the United States itself, In retrospect, 9/11 did not foreshadow By Ronald E. Neumann whistleblowing has protections the major changes that now drive worth knowing about. U.S. foreign policy and national security strategy. By Alain Norman and 43 Raeka Safai By Anthony H . Cordesman From the FSJ Archive 9/11, War on Terror, Iraq 35 and Afghanistan FS Heritage The Proper Measure of the Place: 48 Reflections on the Diplomats Make Afghan Mission a Difference: Drawing from two tours, a decade The U.S. and Mongolia, apart, a veteran diplomat explores the competing visions for Afghanistan. 1986-1990 In the 1992 FSJ, Ambassador By Keith W.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol 5 No 3.Pdf
    PRISM VOL. 5, NO. 3 2015 A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM About VOL. 5, NO. 3 2015 PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex EDITOR and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; relevant policy Michael Miklaucic and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS Connor Christenson Talley Lattimore Jeffrey Listerman Communications Giorgio Rajao Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Hiram Reynolds communications to: COPY EDITORS Editor, PRISM Dale Erickson 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Rebecca Harper Fort Lesley J. McNair Christoff Luehrs Washington, DC 20319 Nathan White Telephone: (202) 685-3442 DESIGN DIRecTOR FAX: Carib Mendez (202) 685-3581 Email: [email protected] ADVISORY BOARD Dr. Gordon Adams Dr. Pauline H. Baker Ambassador Rick Barton Contributions Professor Alain Bauer PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States and Ambassador James F. Dobbins abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to [email protected] Ambassador John E. Herbst (ex officio) with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Dr. David Kilcullen Ambassador Jacques Paul Klein Dr. Roger B. Myerson This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Moisés Naím Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted MG William L.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Russia Competing from Advantageous Ground
    Extending Russia Competing from Advantageous Ground James Dobbins, Raphael S. Cohen, Nathan Chandler, Bryan Frederick, Edward Geist, Paul DeLuca, Forrest E. Morgan, Howard J. Shatz, Brent Williams C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3063 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0021-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Pete Soriano/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of the RAND Corporation research project Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground, sponsored by the Army Quadrennial Defense Review Office, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-8, Headquarters, Department of the Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrected Version Aysegul Keskin Zeren
    IRAQ’S DE-BA`THIFICATION: RATIONALES AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CONTESTED TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE MECHANISM A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aysegul Keskin Zeren January 2014 Dissertation written by Aysegul Keskin Zeren B.A., Istanbul Bilgi University, 2005 M.A., Sabanci University, 2007 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2014 Approved by Patrick G. Coy, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Landon E. Hancock, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Andrew Barnes, Committee Member Pete W. Moore, Outside Committee Member C. Lockwood Reynolds, Graduate Faculty Member Accepted by Andrew Barnes, Chair, Department of Political Science Raymond Craig, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ............................................................................................................... VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 12 1.1 Research Question and Argument ........................................................................... 12 1.2 Transitional Justice .................................................................................................. 17 1.3 The Case: De-Ba`thification .................................................................................... 22 1.4 Structure of the Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • US Nation-Building in Afghanistan
    US Nation-Building in Afghanistan CONOR KEANE US Nation-Building in Afghanistan Why has the US so dramatically failed in Afghanistan since 2001? Dominant explanations have ignored the bureaucratic divisions and personality conlicts inside the US state. This book rectiies this weakness in commentary on Afghani- stan by exploring the signiicant role of these divisions in the US’s dificulties in the country that meant the battle was virtually lost before it even began. The main objective of the book is to deepen readers’ understanding of the impact of bureaucratic politics on nation-building in Afghanistan, focusing primarily on the Bush administration. It rejects the ‘rational actor’ model, according to which the US functions as a coherent, monolithic agent. Instead, internal divisions within the foreign policy bureaucracy are explored, to build up a picture of the internal tensions and contradictions that bedevilled US nation-building efforts. The book also contributes to the vexed issue of whether or not the US should engage in nation-building at all, and if so under what conditions. Dr Conor Keane has degrees in law and politics, and a doctorate on nation- building in Afghanistan from Macquarie University. His research interests include counter terrorism, state building, bureaucratic politics and US foreign policy. He has published several articles on these topics in journals such as Armed Forces & Society and International Peacekeeping. US Nation-Building in Afghanistan Conor Keane First published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2016 Conor Keane The right of Conor Keane to be identiied as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property in Politics and Government | Illinois State Bar Association 7/5/15, 4:50 PM
    Political trademarks: Intellectual property in politics and government | Illinois State Bar Association 7/5/15, 4:50 PM The newsletter of the ISBA’s Section on Intellectual Property Law October 2004, vol. 44, no. 1 Political trademarks: Intellectual property in politics and government By Daniel Kegan Confusion, deception, and mistake are generally unlawful in marketing campaigns. 14 USC § 1125 (a) [Lanham Act § 43(a)]. Yet confusion, deception, and mistake are typically lawful in political campaigns. US Const. Amend. I;1 US Const. Amend. XIV.2 At the other end of the spectrum, confusion is unneeded for enforcement actions involving Olympic symbols, Smokey the Bear, and other specially protected species. Pervasive Branding In an information overloaded society, brands are shortcuts to consumer/citizen attention and shortcuts to citizen/consumer decision-making.3 As Thomas Davenport and John Beck have written in The Attention Economy, in today's information- flooded world, the scarcest resource is attention4. The Brand Names Education Foundation seeks to educate the public to the significance of brand names. (www.bnef.org/about/about.html). Branding has become as commonplace in politics as baby kissing.5 "Political advertising and promotion is political speech, and therefore not encompassed by the term 'commercial.' This is true whether what is being promoted is an individual candidacy for public office, or a particular political issue or point of view." 134 Cong. Rec. H 1297 (daily ed. April 13, 1989) cited in MasterCard International, Inc. v. Nader 2000, 70 USPQ2d 1046 (SD NY 2004) (Candidates use of "priceless" ad parody was political speech, thus categorically exempt from coverage by the Federal Trademark Dilution Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Attack
    Plan of Attack by Bob Woodward Copyright © 2004 by Bob Woodward Published by Simon & Schuster, Inc., N.Y. Used by permission. 480 pages Focus Take-Aways Leadership & Mgt. • Bush’s war planning against Iraq began much earlier than announced: Nov. 21, 2001. Strategy • Rumsfeld found existing war plans abysmal at best. Virtually all were antiquated. Sales & Marketing • VP Dick Cheney demonstrated an anti-Saddam focus some considered near obsessive. Corporate Finance • General Tommy Franks cursed when, amidst the war in Afghanistan, he was told to Human Resources update the war plans on Iraq. Technology & Production • When Rumsfeld micromanaged the Afghan war, Franks said back off or replace me. Small Business • Franks’ initial brief to the president on war plans against Iraq was disguised as an update on the war in Afghanistan. Economics & Politics • Some CIA analysts voiced uncertainty about whether Hussein possessed weapons Industries & Regions of mass destruction. Career Development • Colin Powell warned about the Pottery Barn rule of war — you break it, you own it. Personal Finance • Franks repeatedly cautioned his sub-commanders to take war planning against Iraq Concepts & Trends seriously, because it was going to happen. • The Bush Administration took $700 million that Congress appropriated for the war in Afghanistan and spent it to prepare for the war on Iraq. Rating (10 is best) Overall Applicability Innovation Style 10 6 10 10 To purchase individual Abstracts, personal subscriptions or corporate solutions, visit our Web site at www.getAbstract.com or call us at our U.S. offi ce (954-359-4070) or Switzerland office (+41-41-367-5151).
    [Show full text]
  • Publisher Version
    US Nation-Building in Afghanistan Why has the US so dramatically failed in Afghanistan since 2001? Dominant explanations have ignored the bureaucratic divisions and personality conflicts inside the US state. This book rectifies this weakness in commentary on Afghani­ stan by exploring the significant role of these divisions in the US’s difficulties in the country that meant the battle was virtually lost before it even began. The main objective of the book is to deepen readers’ understanding of the impact of bureaucratic politics on nation-building in Afghanistan, focusing primarily on the Bush administration. It rejects the ‘rational actor’ model, according to which the US functions as a coherent, monolithic agent. Instead, internal divisions within the foreign policy bureaucracy are explored, to build up a picture of the internal tensions and contradictions that bedevilled US nation-building efforts. The book also contributes to the vexed issue of whether or not the US should engage in nation-building at all, and if so under what conditions. Dr Conor Keane has degrees in law and politics, and a doctorate on nation­ building in Afghanistan from Macquarie University. His research interests include counter terrorism, state building, bureaucratic politics and US foreign policy. He has published several articles on these topics in journals such as Armed Forces & Society and International Peacekeeping. US Nation-Building in Afghanistan Conor Keane Routledge MACQUARIE R Taylor & Francis Group UNIVERSITY LONDON AND NEW YORK LIBRARY First published 2016 Contents by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon 0X14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business ' © 2016 Conor Keane The right of Conor Keane to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]