DOCSLIB.ORG

SE69-0933.Plan.Woodland Ave

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SE69-0933.Plan.Woodland Ave WOODLAND AVE (PUBLIC WAY) MIN 1FT OVERLAP REMOVE CONTAINER AND PROPOSED BUSH PLANTING NOTES: SCORE SIDES OF THE ROOT 2" MIN BALL AND LOOSEN ANY 1. EXCAVATE A 2" DEEP BY 3" WIDE TRENCH 166.00' WOOD STAKES ENCIRCLED ROOTS OHE ALONG THE CONTOUR OF WHERE THE STRAW INSTALLED EVERY 3' - 4' TERRAIN SLOPE MASONRY WALL 90 00' 00" WATTLE SHALL BE INSTALLED. DOWN SLOPE APPLY "WETLANDS MEADOW OHE REMOVE ANY FILL FOUND IN MASONRY WALL 114 00' 00" 2. STAKE THE WATTLE IN EVER 3 TO 4 LINEAR SEED MIX" BY NEW ENGLAND STRAW WATTLE THE REPLICATION AREA FEET. USE 2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN STAKES. WETLANDS PLANTS OHE 3. WATTLE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF A 2 FT WF37 WHITE PINE EROSION CONTROL TREES OVERLAP BETWEEN EACH UNIT. OHE 4. BACKFILL THE DOWN SLOPE SIDE OF THE WF36 PROJECT OHE WATTLE TRENCH. LOCATION WETLANDS WF35 2' MIN OHE WOOD STAKES OHE INSTALLED EVERY 3' - 4' FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT WF34 TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE OHE CROSS SECTION PLAN VIEW OHE OHE LP EXIST TREE LINE WF33 OHE LP 100 FT PROJECT LOCUS FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT WETLAND OHE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE BUFFER LINE STRAW WATTLE 50 FT PLANTING CROSS OHE WETLAND NOT TO SCALE OHE BUFFER LINE w WF32 SECTION OHE EXIST TREE LINE 99 NOT TO SCALE OHE 25 FT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT PROPOSED TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE IRRIGATION WETLAND OHE WELL BUFFER LINE MULCH PILE OHE WF31 STONE PILE CONTRACTOR NOTES / GENERAL NOTES: OHE BITUMINOUS 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED STRAW OHE PRUNE ALL DEAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STORMWATER MANUAL AND LOCAL REGULATIONS WATTLE FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT PRUNE ALL DEAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES ACCORDING TO ACCEPTED 2. ALL PIPING COMPONENTS IN THIS PROPOSED SYSTEM SHALL BE SOLID SCHEDULE 40 PVC, PIPE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE TREE ACCORDING TO ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE. OHE 50 FT HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE. SIZE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS. PIPING SHALL BE SOLVENT WELDED WITH WETLAND 4" WETLAND LOAM AND SEED MIX APPROPRIATE GLUE. OHE BUFFER LINE 3" MINIMUM HARDWOOD MULCH 3. DESIGN ENGINEER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES AS A RESULT OF FAULTY STAKE TREES CONSTRUCTION OR ANY DEVIATION OF ALIGNMENT AND GRADE SPECIFIED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR OHE SET CROWN OR ROOT BALL 6" REMOVE EXISTING FILL MAXIMUM ABOVE SURROUNDING WRITTEN NOTIFICATION AND WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 98 WETLANDS MIX SET CROWN OR ROOT BALL 6" FINISHED GRADE. OHE OR DISTURBED GROUND SEEDING MAXIMUM ABOVE SURROUNDING 4. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM FIELD SURVEY BY OAKHILL ENGINEERING IN JUNE WF30 FINISHED GRADE. 2021 & JULY 2021. THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AS A PROPERTY BOUNDS SURVEY. FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT FOLD BACK BURLAP OHE TREE TREE TREE TREE FOLD BACK BURLAP FROM TOP OF BALL. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM DUE DILIGENCE ON LOCATING BURIED UTILITIES, BURIED PLANTER BED PROPOSED TREE PLANTING (TYP) FROM TOP OF BALL. STRUCTURES, OVERHEAD WIRES, AND OBSTRUCTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OSHA, OHE 99 LOCAL, AND STATE REGULATIONS. BACKFILL SOIL TO BE PLANTING MIX. MIXTURE 6. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY LOCAL APPROVING AUTHORITY. OHE PROPOSED STRAW BACKFILL SOIL TO BE WATTLE PLANTING MIX. MIXTURE TO BE DONE OUTSIDE 7. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL LAWN IS MOWABLE AND TO BE DONE OUTSIDE PLANTING PIT. GROUND SURFACE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. OHE PLANTING PIT. WF29 8. OAKHILL ENGINEERING SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER 324.56' FRUIT FRUIT FRUIT 12" MIN. WF28 OHE TREE TREE TREE PLAYGROUND CONSTRUCTION, CLEAR AREAS, FALL AREAS, SAFE SURFACES, AND ANY LIABILITY 12" WF6 MIN. EXISTING ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLAY STRUCTURE AND ANY INTEGRAL PARTS OF SYSTEM AND SAFETY. OHE WF7 EXISTING SUBGRADE LOOSEN SUBSOIL AT 9. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO 310 CMR 15.000 AND ANY AND ALL LOCAL BY SUBGRADE BUSHES MAP: 028 LOOSEN SUBSOIL AT BASE WITH PITCH FORK LAW CONDITIONS. BASE WITH PITCH FORK TO DEPTH OF 8". BENCH MARK OHE BLUEBERRY & BERRY 97 TO DEPTH OF 8". 10. FLAG LINE WAS PERFORMED BY APPLIED ECOSYSTEM SOLUTIONS IN JUNE 2021. NAIL IN POLE LOT: 107 BUFFERWETLAND LINE25 FT 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER FALL CLEARANCES WITH THE PROPOSED ASSOCIATED EL: 100.14' OHE TU RM PLAY EQUIPMENT. WF27 WH WB PLANTER BED BB UTP OHE PROPOSED WETLANDS PLANTING DETAILS BB 96 REPLICATION EXIST TREE LINE OHE WO NOT TO SCALE OHE 98 WF5 BB BB WH APPLY "WETLANS MEADOW OHE WB WF8 SEED MIX" BY NEW ENGLAND WETLANDS PLANTS OHE 337.51' 3,200 SF INSTALL WETLANDS OHE 10" X 3.5" X 1.5" CEDAR RAILS 8' WF4 BB SIGN ON POST (TYP) WITH TAPERED TIPS (TYP) CEDAR POST OHE WB PROPOSED SPLIT 97 6" (TYP) RM RAIL FENCE CEDAR POST OHE 96 4.5" (TYP) WF26 ALTERNATE TAKE 100 SF OF OHE OVERLAP PROPOSED STRAW 10" SLOTS WETLANDS AND WF2 WATTLE BB WB WF9 3'-6" (TYP) REPLICATE 200 SF FT OHE WF3 4.5" OHE BB WH 10" X 3.5" X 1.5" CEDAR RAILS WITH TAPERED TIPS (TYP) OHE WB BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TU OHE WH WETLANDS WO MAP: 028 RM BB OHE WF1 BB LOT: 105 WF25 BB 2' OHE 1,100 SF WF10 PROPOSE ROCK BOULDER WB OHE POST SHALL BE WALL TO PREVENT WB AREA TO BE BURIED A MIN 2 FT EROSION & SAFETY OHE REPLICATED 97 WH FRUIT 98 TREE OHE BB BB OHE OHE WF24 WF11 97 OHE 98 BENCH MARK SPLIT RAIL FENCE FRUIT OHE MAG IN ROAD WH TREE EL: 97.92' NOT TO SCALE WF22OHE WF12 WF14 FRUIT COMPOST BIN TREE WETLANDS WF23 OHE30" PIPE OHE WF13 25 FT WF20 MASONRY WO PLANTING PLAN WF21 OHE WETLAND WALL LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVALS REQUIRED BUFFER LINE SYMBOL QUANTITY PLANT NAME LATIN NAME PLANT SIZE WF19 OHE 1. SEEKONK CONSERVATION COMMISSION REGULATIONS BB 12 BLUEBERRY CYANOCOCCUS 3 GALLON POT OHE 2.2.2.2 - BUFFER STRIP, ALLOWING GROUND DISTURBANCE WB 7 WINTER BERRY LLEX VERTICILLATA 3 GALLON POT OHE WITHIN THE 25 FT NO TOUCH ZONE. WF18 WH 6 WITCH HAZEL KALMIA LATIFOLIA 3 GALLON POT OHE WF17 100 FT 2. SEEKONK CONSERVATION COMMISSION REGULATIONS RM 3 RED MAPLE ACER RUBRUM 1" CALIBER OHE WETLAND BUFFER LINE 2.2.2.2 - BUFFER STRIP, ALLOWING A STRUCTURE INSIDE TU 2 TUPELO NYSSA SYLVATICA 1" CALIBER OHE EXISTING THE 50 FT BUFFER. PLANTER WO 3 SWAMP WHITE OAK QUERCUS BICOLOR 1" CALIBER WF16 OHE EXISTING PINE 50 FT TREES OHE WETLAND 210 39' 00" PLANTING PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS BUFFER LINE PROPOSED STRAW OHE WATTLE UTP UE N UE WF15 UE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED SPLIT UE RAIL FENCE SCALE: 1'' = 20' UE 279.08' UE 0" 1" 2" 25 FT UE WETLAND OPEN AIR UE BUFFER LINE CARPORT 124 00' 20" 0' 10' 40' 50 FT WETLAND EXISTING (3) CONSERVATORY BUFFER LINE BEDROOM HOUSE LEGEND SHEET NUMBER: W-1 GARAGE / FARM AND RESTORATION SHED SCALE = 1" = 20' PATIO ADJUSTED WATER TABLE PLAN DATE: 07/25/2021 APPLICANT: OBSERVED WATER TABLE DOUGLAS CLARY 231 WOODLAND AVE TEST PIT 100 FT SEEKONK, MA 02771 WETLAND 231 WOODLAND AVE DRAWN BY: MPM 105 Map: 025 BUFFER LINE EXISTING GRADE 105 PROPOSED GRADE SEEKONK, MA 02771 Lot: 119 CHECKED BY: MPM GAS GAS LINE WATER LINE ENGINEER STAMP: 231 WOODLAND AVE FENCE LINE UE OWNER: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 3.50 ACRES + / - UT OAKHILL ENGINEERING LLC UNDERGROUND TELECOM DOUGLAS CLARY OHE MAP: 028 OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL 75 OAK HILL AVE; 2ND FL UTILITY POLE 231 WOODLAND AVE SEEKONK, MA 02771 PROPOSED FARM DEVELOPMENT & LOT: 106 HYDRANT BURIED VALVE SEEKONK, MA 02771 500.55' EROSION CONTROL 401-574-0871 REPLICATION DRAINAGE LINES WETLANDS LINE / BUFFER [email protected] SCALE: 1' = 20' WETLANDS FLAG.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LILY COX-RICHARD Sculptures the Size of Hailstones 17 February - 12 May 2018
    LCR: In this show, I’m using found objects and sculptures I’ve made and The 2018 Cell Series is generously supported by trying to put them in positions where they can slip between multiple McGinnis Family Fund of Communities Foundation of Texas systems. In addition to lightning rods and scrap copper, I’m working on with additional funding from new sculptures that could fit in your hand. The “hail scale” is used to Susie and Joe Clack measure the size of hailstones by comparing them to common objects like Gene and Marsha Gray a walnut, golf ball, or teacup: hailstones the size of ____. Your earlier Amy and Patrick Kelly questions about context are really important here—what might be enor- mous for a hailstone might be a very modest size for a sculpture. Talking Sally and Robert Porter about the weather is often considered banal, but lately, the weather has been urgently claiming a lot more space for discussion. What happens when we ignore an important conversation or dismiss small talk (or small Past Cell Series artists: sculptures)? I’m interested in zooming in on details and giving them a lot DENNY PICKETT - 2008 | JEFFREY BROSK - 2009 | RANDY BACON - 2009 of space and attention. JOHN FROST - 2009 | NANCY LAMB - 2010 | JOHN ROBERT CRAFT - 2010 TERRI THORNTON - 2010 | ANNE ALLEN - 2011 | WILL HENRY - 2011 The sculptures the size of hailstones will sit on a large plaster plinth that ERIC ZIMMERMAN - 2011 | BILL DAVENPORT - 2012 | JUSTIN BOYD - 2012 has woven basket forms embedded in it, forming niches and craters. Often CAROL BENSON - 2012 | KANA HARADA - 2013 | BRAD TUCKER - 2013 pedestals and plinths are made to blend into their surroundings; but of ANTHONY SONNENBERG - 2013 | CHRIS SAUTER - 2014 course, they can never disappear.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture
    International Journal of Advance Industrial Engineering E-ISSN 2320 –5539 ©2018 INPRESSCO®, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijaie/ Research Article Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture * ^* # M.H Abdella , A.E Musa and S.B Ali #Department of Leather Engineering, School of Industrial Engineering and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum – Sudan ^Department of Leather Technology, College of Applied and Industrial Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum – Sudan Received 01 April 2018, Accepted 01 June 2018, Available online 05 June 2018, Vol.6, No.2 (June 2018) Abstract The retanning process is a very important step in leather manufacturing because it overcomes some of the disadvantages of chrome tannage and it can contributes to further stabilization of collagen fibers and good handle of leather, such as fullness, softness, elasticity and so on. In order to meet customers’ requirements, a wide variety of retanning agents are used in retanning process viz. vegetable tan and phenolic synthetic/organic tanning materials. Sunt bark, widely distributed in Sudan, has been evaluated for its utilization in the retanning of the leathers. In the present investigation, sunt bark powder has been used for the retanning of wet blue leathers. The effectiveness sunt bark in retanning of wet blue leathers has been compared with wattle retanning. The organoleptic properties of the leathers viz. softness, fullness, grain smoothness, grain tightness (break), general appearance, uniformity of dyeing of sunt bark retanned leather have been evaluated in comparison with wattle retanned leathers. Sunt retanning resulted in leathers with good grain tightness.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.00 Download Free
    This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA 45 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd I 16/07/15 13:00 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd II 16/07/15 13:00 ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY EXCERPTA ARCHAEOLOGICA LEIDENSIA EDITED BY CORRIE BAKELS AND HANS KAMERMANS LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2015 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd III 16/07/15 13:00 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Editor of illustrations: Joanne Porck Copyright 2015 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-822251-2-9 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia can be ordered at: P.J.R. Modderman Stichting Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9514 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd IV 16/07/15 13:00 Contents The stable isotopes 13C and 15N in faunal bone of the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen (Germany): statistical modeling 1 Juliette Funck Thijs van Kolfschoten Hans van der Plicht ‘Trapping the past’? Hunting for remote capture techniques and planned coastal exploitation during MIS 5 at Blombos Cave and Klasies River, South Africa 15 Gerrit L. Dusseldorp Geeske H.J. Langejans A Late Neolithic Single Grave Culture burial from Twello (central Netherlands): environmental setting, burial ritual and contextualisation 29 Lucas Meurkens Roy van Beek Marieke Doorenbosch Harry
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Wattle in Hawaii and Recommend the Same for Publication As Bulle­ Tin No
    HAWAII AQRICULTVRAL EXPERIMENT STA'I'IO!i. :J. G. SI\IITH, SPECIAJ:, AGENT IN CHARGE. BULLETIN No. 11. ·THE BLACK·WATTLE (Acacia c!eCUt'f,ens) IN HAWAII. BY JARED G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE, HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. UNDER THE. _Sl,l'ERVISION .. OJ' OF'F_ICE OF EXPERIMENT STP.TIONS, U.S. !)epartment ofAgriculture. WASHINGTON: :: ·--<: ;,: .. '~. -- .'. GOVERN~IENT PRI)'<TING. OFFICE: 1996. 863 HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. J. G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE. BULLETIN No. 11. 'THE BLACK WATTLE (Acacia decurrens) IN HA\VAII. BY JARED G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE, HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS, U. S. Department ofAgriculture. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. I 9 06. HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION, HONOLULU. [Under the supervision of A. C. TRuE; Director of the Office of Experiment Stations, United States Department of Agriculture.] STATION STAFF. JARED G. SMITH, Special, Agent in Charge. D. L. VAN DINE, Entomotogist. EDMUND C. SHOREY, Chemist. J.E. HIGGINS, Horticulturist. F. G. KRAUSS, In Charge of Rice Investigations. Q. Q. BRADFORD, Farm Foreman. C. R; BLACOW; In Charge ofTobacco Experiments (P. 0., Paauilo, Hawaii). \2) LETTER OF TRANSMITl'AL. HONOLULU, HAWAII, January 1, 1906. Sm: I have the honor to transmit herewith a paper on The Black Wattle in Hawaii and recommend the same for publication as Bulle­ tin No. 11 of the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Very respectfully, JARED G. SMITH, Special Agent in Charge, Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. A. C. TRUE, Director, Office of Experiment Stations, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    H A I N E S G A L L E R Y DAVID NASH Born in Surrey, England, 1945 Lives and works in Blaenau Ffestiniog, North Wales, UK EDUCATION 1965 Kingston College of Art, UK 1970 Chelsea School of Art, London, UK SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 David Nash: 200 Seasons, Towner Art Gallery, Eastbourne, UK David Nash: Trees, Galerie Lelong & Co., Paris, France David Nash: Sculpture through the Seasons, National Museum Cardiff, Wales 2018 Tout jaune, Galerie Simon Blais, Montreal, Canada Columns, Galerie Lelong & Co., Paris, France David Nash: Nature to Nature, Fondation Fernet-Branca, Saint-Louis, France David Nash: Wood, Metal, Pigment, Annely Judah Fine Art, London, UK First The Tree, Then The Shape, Museum Lothar Fischer, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany 2017 With Space in Mind, Tremenheere Sculpture Gardens, Penzance, UK New Beginnings, Alan Cristea Gallery, London, UK David Nash, Galeria Simon Blais, Montreal, Canada David Nash, Galeria Alvaro Alcazar, Madrid, Spain Art Project, Krauhuegel & Art and Church, Kollegienkirche, Salzburg, Austria Tree Seasons, Plas Glyn-y-Weddw, Gwynedd, Wales 2016 David Nash: Columns, Peaks and Torso, Galerie Lelong, Paris, France 2015 With Space in Mind, Alan Cristea Gallery, London, UK Three Black Humps, Coalbrookdale Museum of Iron, Shropshire, UK King & Queen I, Keepers House The Royal Academy, London, UK 2014 David Nash Stencil Prints, Abbot’s Room, Kloster Schoenthal, Switzerland David Nash: Prints and Multiples, Galerie Lelong, Paris, France David Nash, Kukje Gallery, Seoul, South Korea David Nash: From
    [Show full text]
  • Wattle and Daub
    Wattle and Daub ”The greatest part of our building in the cities and good towns of England consisteth only of timber, for as yet few of the houses of the communalty (except here and there in the west country towns) are made of stone….’these english’, quoth he [a Spaniard of Queen Mary’s day] , 'have their houses made of sticks and dirt, but they fare commonly so well as the king”. William Harrison, Description of England, 1587 Wattle and daub is the term for the panels of woven wood and mud used to fill between the timbers of many of the Museum’s buildings. This combination of materials has been used since at least the Bronze Age; fragmentary remains of daub-like mixtures bearing wattle imprints often survive in the archaeological record having been ‘fired’ as a building burnt down and waterlogged remains of wattle panels occasionally survive also. Brick nogging might also have been used to fill in between the timbers but this was also sometimes used to replace earlier wattle and daub. Evidence for the previous existence for wattle and daub panels may come from marks left on the main timbers by daub, and from auger holes drilled into the upper timber of the panel and grooves cut into the lower where the uprights for the wattle were fitted in. Timber framing with wattle and daub panels was the dominant form of building construction in many parts of England and Wales from the mid 12th century. It was common in some areas until the late 18th century and was used into the 19th century for lower status housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Wattle and Daub (KS2)
    Schools Wattle and Daub (KS2) How did people build houses in the Stone Age? Let’s go back in time and build one! Trees have been used to build houses for thousands of years. Wattle and daub are building materials used to make these houses in the Stone/Bronze/Iron Age across Britain and Western Europe. What you’ll need • Wattle and daub kits (can be loaned from City of Trees) • Air dry clay Subjects • Hay • Water History, Science, • Mixing bowl Art & design Learning Objectives: • Ability to address and devise historically relevant questions • Understanding of Stone/Bronze/Iron Age life • Ability to note connections and trends between Stone/Bronze/Iron Age technologies Lesson Plan: Warm up/Introduction Role-playing: Find the right materials to build a house. The children must first find a strong oak tree for the long posts of their house, then willow, hazel, or birch for the structure of the walls and then mud to complete their walls. A full script for this role-playing activity is in Appendix A. Main Learning 1. Split children into groups of 4 or 5 2. Half of the groups will make the ‘wattle’ and the other half the ‘daub.’ 3. Step by step instructions for each of these two components are in Appendix B 4. Once all the groups have finished making their wattle or daub, each daub groups will pair up with a wattle group to complete the build together as show in Appendix B. Additional Activities: Cave painting or Celtic runes If you build the wall in the morning using air dry clay, pop it on the windowsill or another warm place to let it dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Mud-Brick Architecture
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Mud-Brick Architecture Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4983w678 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Emery, Virginia L. Publication Date 2011-02-19 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California MUD-BRICK ARCHITECTURE عمارة الطوب اللبن Virginia L. Emery EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Emery, 2011, Mud-Brick Architecture. UEE. Full Citation: Emery, Virginia L., 2011, Mud-Brick Architecture. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0026w9hb 1146 Version 1, February 2011 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0026w9hb MUD-BRICK ARCHITECTURE عمارة الطوب اللبن Virginia L. Emery Ziegelarchitektur L’architecture en brique crue Mud-brick architecture, though it has received less academic attention than stone architecture, was in fact the more common of the two in ancient Egypt; unfired brick, made from mud, river, or desert clay, was used as the primary building material for houses throughout Egyptian history and was employed alongside stone in tombs and temples of all eras and regions. Construction of walls and vaults in mud-brick was economical and relatively technically uncomplicated, and mud-brick architecture provided a more comfortable and more adaptable living and working environment when compared to stone buildings. على الرغم أن العمارة بالطوب اللبن تلقت إھتماما أقل من العمارة الحجرية من قِبَل المتخصصين، فقد كانت في الواقع تلك العمارة ھي اﻷكثر شيوعا في مصر القديمة، وكان الطوب اللبن (أوالنيء) المصنوع من الطمي أو الطين الصحراوي مستخدما كمادة بناء بدائية للمنازل على مدار التاريخ المصري واستخدمت إلى جانب الحجارة في المقابر والمعابد في جميع المناطق وخﻻل جميع الفترات.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Build a Mississippian House: a Study of Domestic Architecture in West – Central Alabama
    HOW TO BUILD A MISSISSIPPIAN HOUSE: A STUDY OF DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE IN WEST – CENTRAL ALABAMA by CAMERON HAWKINS LACQUEMENT A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the Graduate School of the University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2004 Submitted by Cameron H. Lacquement in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts specializing in Anthropology. Accepted on behalf of the Faculty of the Graduate School by the thesis committee: _________________________________ Keith P. Jacobi, Ph.D. ____________________________ Richard A. Krause, Ph.D. ____________________________ Kathryn S. Oths, Ph.D. ____________________________ Richard R. Polhemus, Ph.D. ____________________________ Vernon J. Knight, Jr., Ph.D. Chairperson ________________________ Date ____________________________ Michael D. Murphy, Ph.D. Department Chairperson ________________________ Date ____________________________ Ronald W. Rogers, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School ii Acknowledgments I am indebted to a number of individuals for their assistance in completing this thesis project. I would like to extend special gratitude to Vernon J. Knight Jr. for his support and guidance throughout this project. Without him, it would not have been possible. I also would like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Keith P. Jacobi, Richard A. Krause, Kathryn S. Oths, and Richard R. Polhemus for their encouragement and direction during my project. I am also indebted to Kenneth J. Fridley, Professor and Chair of the University of Alabama’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, who was not an official member of my committee, yet treated me as one of his own students.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Analysis of a Possible Prehistoric
    OS Grid Ref: TQ 57045 39336 ‘Analysis Of A Possible Prehistoric Tumulus And Related Monuments – Rusthall, Kent’ By Nigel T Stapple BSc (Hons) – Landscape investigator, WKDArchaeology March 2019 Photo: SW view of the Rusthall ‘Tumulus’ - Tunbridge Wells Golf Club (Jan 2019) Disclaimer: This review is not intended as a definitive statement as to the validity of the proposed archaeology. It merely offers one possible interpretation of the landscape features in the absence of an unequivocal modern context. More so, this review is not presented as an academic paper nor implied as such. The views expressed are the authors own and subject to broad interpretation. All research & photos ©N T Stapple unless otherwise stated. Introduction Preliminary research began back in 2017 at two areas of interest in Rusthall. The author became intrigued be an isolated sandstone outcrop close to the junction of Rusthall Road and Langton Road, near the house known as ‘Dingly Dell’. Surviving in a heavily modified post medieval landscape, its presence, in the modern landscape, seemed unusual. Measuring approximately 5m x 1.5m x 1m, above ground, it showed clear evidence of being quarried. Given its form and size the author postulated that it may have in fact been the remains of a former standing stone, preserved in antiquity. This hypothesis was later backed up by confirmation of a large pit found at the western end of the stone and visible as a parch mark in 2018. [Fig 1.]. This was thought to be a ‘slot’ for the ‘standing’ stone. Figure 1: Rusthall 'Standing Stone' - Summer 2018 Information regarding the stone had previously been presented to Kent County Council (KCC) representatives and the stone is documented in several of the authors earlier reviews of on-going research.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Britain
    Prehistoric Britain Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Bronze boars from the Hounslow Hoard 1st century BC-1st century AD Hounslow, Middlesex, England Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Prehistoric Britain Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Neolithic mystery objects Gallery activity: Looking good in the Neolithic Gallery activity: Neolithic farmers Gallery activity: Bronze Age pot Gallery activity: Iron Age design Gallery activity: An Iron Age hoard After your visit Follow-up activities Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Background information Prehistoric Britain Archaeologists and historians use the term ‘Prehistory’ to refer to a time in a people’s history before they used a written language. In Britain the term Prehistory refers to the period before Britain became part of the Roman empire in AD 43. The prehistoric period in Britain lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and this long period of time is usually divided into: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (sometimes these three periods are combined and called the Stone Age), Bronze Age and Iron Age. Each of these periods might also be sub-divided into early, middle and late. The Palaeolithic is often divided into lower, middle and upper. Early Britain British Isles: Humans probably first arrived in Britain around 800,000 BC. These early inhabitants had to cope with extreme environmental changes and they left Britain at least seven times when conditions became too bad.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Manual for Earthquake-Resistant Houses Built Of
    Gernot Minke Construction manual for earthquake-resistant houses built of earth Published by GATE - BASIN (Building Advisory Service and Information Network) at GTZ GmbH (Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit) P.O.Box 5180 D-65726 Eschborn Tel.: ++49-6196-79-3095 Fax: ++49-6196-79-7352 e-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.gtz.de/basin December 2001 Contents Acknowledgement 4 Introduction 5 1. General aspects of earthquakes 6 1.1 Location, magnitude, intensity 6 1.2 Structural aspects 6 2. Placement of house in the case of 8 slopes 3. Shape of plan 9 4. Typical failures, 11 typical design mistakes 5. Structural design aspects 13 6. Rammed earth walls 14 6.1 General 14 6.2 Stabilization through mass 15 6.3 Stabilization through shape of16 elements 6.4 Internal reinforcement 19 7. Adobe walls 22 7.1 General 22 7.2 Internal reinforcement 24 7.3 Interlocking blocks 26 7.4 Concrete skeleton walls with 27 adobe infill 8. Wattle and daub 28 9. Textile wall elements filled with 30 earth 10. Critical joints and elements 34 10.1 Joints between foundation, 34 plinth and wall 10.2 Ring beams 35 10.3 Ring beams which act as roof support 36 11. Gables 37 12. Roofs 38 12.1 General 38 12.2 Separated roofs 38 13. Openings for doors and windows 41 14. Domes 42 15. Vaults 46 16. Plasters and paints 49 Bibliographic references 50 3 Acknowledgement This manual was first published in Spanish within the context of the research and development project Viviendas sismorresistentes en zonas rurales de los Andes, supported by the German organizations Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn (DFG), and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn (gtz).
    [Show full text]