DOCSLIB.ORG

'Analysis of a Possible Prehistoric

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Analysis of a Possible Prehistoric OS Grid Ref: TQ 57045 39336 ‘Analysis Of A Possible Prehistoric Tumulus And Related Monuments – Rusthall, Kent’ By Nigel T Stapple BSc (Hons) – Landscape investigator, WKDArchaeology March 2019 Photo: SW view of the Rusthall ‘Tumulus’ - Tunbridge Wells Golf Club (Jan 2019) Disclaimer: This review is not intended as a definitive statement as to the validity of the proposed archaeology. It merely offers one possible interpretation of the landscape features in the absence of an unequivocal modern context. More so, this review is not presented as an academic paper nor implied as such. The views expressed are the authors own and subject to broad interpretation. All research & photos ©N T Stapple unless otherwise stated. Introduction Preliminary research began back in 2017 at two areas of interest in Rusthall. The author became intrigued be an isolated sandstone outcrop close to the junction of Rusthall Road and Langton Road, near the house known as ‘Dingly Dell’. Surviving in a heavily modified post medieval landscape, its presence, in the modern landscape, seemed unusual. Measuring approximately 5m x 1.5m x 1m, above ground, it showed clear evidence of being quarried. Given its form and size the author postulated that it may have in fact been the remains of a former standing stone, preserved in antiquity. This hypothesis was later backed up by confirmation of a large pit found at the western end of the stone and visible as a parch mark in 2018. [Fig 1.]. This was thought to be a ‘slot’ for the ‘standing’ stone. Figure 1: Rusthall 'Standing Stone' - Summer 2018 Information regarding the stone had previously been presented to Kent County Council (KCC) representatives and the stone is documented in several of the authors earlier reviews of on-going research. There appears to be no local historical narrative to the nature and origin of the stone nor previous archaeological analysis. It would seem the stone has been largely overlooked and generally regarded as simply a random, natural outcrop. The author feels there is sufficient evidence to reconsider an alternative context to the stone. Indeed this review will also present a plausible connection to a nearby earthwork, which is the main focus of this review. In 2017 an interested Tunbridge Wells golf cub member invited the author to survey another stone, on the 8th Green of the golf course. [Fig 2.].The stone sits in isolation and at least 60m from the natural sandstone outcrop to the SW of the green. Largely rectangular in shape, it measured approx. 2.5.m x 2m x 1.5m. Again it showed clear evidence of being quarried as well as additional markings. Established in AD1885, the Golf Club had no information as to why the stone was there? Across the entire 9 hole course no other large stones are recorded. The author suggested that to stone was not a natural outcrop and may well have been in a more ‘upright’ position, as suggested by its general shape. One area of the exposed surface showed clear evidence of a carving that was triangular in form. [Fig 3.] Triangular Engraving Cut ‘Notch’ Figure 2: Isolated Sandstone Rock - 8th Green, TW Golf Course - Feb 2019 Above: View looking in a general SW direction. The exposed natural bedrock can be seen in the background, some distance from the isolated stone. The presence of a clear cut ‘notch’ at the base of the stone, may have been related to the transportation and original positioning of the stone. The use of large timbers, placed in such notches, may have been a practice well used in the past. The presence of such a notch (and there may be additional notches not exposed at this point) would seem to strongly suggest that the stone had been quarried and originally moved to or near it’s current position. Discussions, with golf club members, agree that it is unlikely to be a landscape feature related to the laying out of the original golf course. Left: Close up of engraving. Its triangular form may well be indicative of a primitive representation of the pubic area, thought to represent fertility and well documented at numerous prehistoric sites. Measuring around 50cm in length its surviving form is very compelling and may well be of considerable date. Figure 3: Triangular 'carving' on stone Identification Of A Possible Tumulus? Although the purpose for the original site visit to the golf course was related to the second isolated stone, the author was struck by a more imposing landscape feature. Set close the stone and rising some 10m, a large ‘finger’ of land dominated the immediate surroundings. Its form did not immediately suggest it was completely natural and investigations of the mound quickly showed evidence of ditches, banks and levelled areas, as well as additional large stones on top of the mound. [Fig 4.] It is also noted was the presence of Bluebells, considered to be an environmental indicator of ancient woodland (pre- AD1600). The author invited consultant archaeologist, David Thorpe, to visit the site, who then concurred that the mound was ‘...not completely natural’. Consideration was given for a post-medieval context, including a large spoil heap from a nearby quarry, though this was later dismissed as several compelling counter arguments were presented. This included a geological overview of the abundant Tunbridge Wells Sandstone outcrops, suggesting that much of the quarry stone came from areas of long exposed bedrock with only a thin layer of mulch and sand on top of the bedrock. See Appendix. The level of spoil would have been minimal in any case and simply dumped behind the quarrymen and, indeed, the spoil can still be seen at the nearby quarry known as Bulls Hollow. Since the availability of free LiDAR imagery it has greatly enhanced the ability of landscape archaeologists to see features not always obvious on the ground. The author has made extensive use of LiDAR, as well as on-site surveys and map analysis, to gain a better understanding and possible context for the landscape features. It is by using such comparisons that an opinion can be formed based on the current level of research. This has lead to the authors own assertion that the earthwork may well be an unrecorded tumulus of some considerable size and hidden in plain site within the local landscape. Figure 4: A series of man-made features Above: Opposite side of the mound (to the stone), showing evidence of earthworks on and around the mound. The earthwork is recorded on OS maps dated to at least AD1871, and before the construction of the golf course (AD1885). LiDAR Analysis Rudimentary measurements have been taken, using a combination of Google Earth with LiDAR overlays. Whilst the author accepts this is a somewhat ‘crude’ method of surveying a site (in the absence of ground level survey equipment) it does offer a basic description of the layout and size of the earthwork in relation to the local landscape. LiDAR confirms, with little ambiguity, that the mound is man-made. [Fig 5.] Bulls Hollow Quarry Rusthall ‘Tumulus’ Rusthall Common Tunbridge Wells Common Figure 5: LiDAR - Wide View Of Rusthall & Tunbridge Wells Above: Analysis of LiDAR clearly shows the Rusthall ‘Tumulus’ is not a natural feature in the local landscape. Its length is approx. 130m and its widest point is round 40m. Its elongated and symmetrical ‘cigar’ shape would suggest it is deliberate in design and construction. It does not have the ‘randomness’ of ‘dumped’ quarry waste and is around 140m away from Bulls Hollow quarry (undated). Close to the NW side of the mound are the remains of two clear earth quarries. [Fig 6.] The date for the two quarries is unknown but are not untypical of soil extraction at numerous prehistoric Barrows and similar earthworks found in Britain and Europe. Left: Surviving evidence of quarry pits close to the constructed mound. Evidence of additional quarries may well Earth Quarries have been destroyed be the re- modelling of the golf course and and landscaping of the garden associated with ‘Dingly Dell’. However LiDAR does suggest the mound is likely to have been constructed using nearby soils? Figure 6: Expanded View Of Mound & 'Quarries' Stone On 8th Green ‘Revetment’? 2 ‘Revetment’? 1 Figure 7: Highlighted Features Above: Close up view of mound and local features. Of note is the observed alignment of the Rusthall ‘Standing Stone’ (1) through the centre of the mound and a second stone (2). Though some would argue a ‘coincidental’ connection to the proposed alignment there is visual evidence that the alignment only works based on the fixed position of the original Rusthall ‘standing stone’ (1). Had the stone been discovered in any other position the alignment would simply not work. [Fig 8.] Establishing the origins and context for the various large stones recorded in this review is paramount. Although the immediate area has produced a cluster of Mesolithic finds (see appendix.), as yet no conclusive evidence of monument builders (Neolithic/Bronze Age) has been confirmed on-site. However the author has established strong evidence for a major late Neolithic – early Bronze Age settlement near Harwarton (Speldhurst)1 and less than 2km from the mound. A second, similar site (in terms of flint assemblages) was also identified at Southborough (Ridgewaye), around 3km from Rusthall. It is quite likely that additional settlement sites would have existed in and around the Tunbridge Wells area but have long since been destroyed by urban development or simply remain hidden under plough soils. None-the-less confirmation of such early settlements does suggest a greater 1 Research Review - ‘Evaluation Of A Large Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age Flint Assemblage Within A Settlement Context’, Stapple, N.T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Tunbridge Wells Borough Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan March 2021 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background and Policy Context ..................................................................................... 2 National Policy ...................................................................................................................... 2 Local Policy .......................................................................................................................... 3 Local Plan policy context and strategy for growth ................................................................ 4 Policy STR 1 - The Development Strategy .............................................................................. 6 What is infrastructure? ......................................................................................................... 8 Engagement ....................................................................................................................... 10 Prioritisation of infrastructure .............................................................................................. 11 Identified risks .................................................................................................................... 12 Timing ................................................................................................................................ 12 Costs .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine Summer 2011 Plan Your Walk
    magazine summer 2011 magazine summer 2011 Southern England Southern England 09 Land’s End Peninsula, Cornwall 10 Avebury, Wiltshire 12/05/2011 16:30 l Distance 22½km/14 miles l Time 7hrs l Type Coast l Distance 18km/11 miles l Time 6½hrs l Type Countryside NAVIGATION FITNESS NAVIGATION FITNESS 1 LEVEL 1 2/3 LEVEL 2/3 2 LEVEL 2 2 LEVEL 2 feature p61 Plan your walk Plan your walk SEE Newquay l Cheltenham Redruth Gloucester Oxford St Ives l l CORNWALL Swindon l Penzance P Bristol Reading Falmouth N l TRO L Bath AVEBURY ORGA AR LAND’S END B A PENINSULA N EVE M O Landewednack T Salisbury HY: S HY: HY: FI HY: P P WHERE: Linear walk from WHERE: Circular walk from Gurnard’s Head to Sennen To find great accommodation, visit Avebury, Wiltshire. Cove via Cape Cornwall. www.ramblers.org.uk/accommodation START/END: The Red Lion, PHOTOGRA PHOTOGRA START: Gurnard’s Head Avebury (SU103699). (SW436376). Of all Cornwall’s wonderful sides of the peninsula, taking in TERRAIN: Unmarked but Taking in the first section of the cloak optional). At the end of END: Sennen Cove coastline, stretches of the north rugged cliffs, mining relics, splendid straightforward footpaths Great Stones Way, this ‘taster’ the field, cross two stiles and (SW355263). coast and the Land’s End headlands and beautiful coves. over open, chalky farmland route starts and ends inside continue beside the road, TERRAIN: Rugged coastal Peninsula must share first prize with plenty of historic the prehistoric stone circle at keeping to the L of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analytical Survey of Dry Hill Camp
    1 An analytical survey of Dry Hill Camp Parish: Dormansland District: Tandridge County: Surrey NGR: TQ 4320 4175 Monument No: 407284 Date of Survey: 2011-2013 Report author: Judie English MCIfA, PhD, FSA April 2020 2 Contents Geology, topography and present land use 3 Historical and Archaeological Background 3 The Survey 12 The Hillfort 12 The surrounding fields 29 The northern field 29 The southern field 31 The south-western field 33 Iron slag and ‘Cyrena’ limestone from excavations by Winbolt and Margary (1933) 33 Discussion 34 Acknowledgements 39 References 39 Distribution 41 3 Geology, topography and present land use Dry Hill Camp (TQ 4320 4175; Monument Number 407284; HER 1269; Pastscape URL http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob id=407284) is a large enclosure of probable Iron Age date, set at 170m OD and looking across the Eden/Medway Valley to the northern portion of the Low Weald and North Downs. It is multi-vallate with an enclosed area of c.10ha and lies just within Surrey, close to the present county boundary with Kent, and with that of East Sussex about 1 mile to the south (figure 1). The hill is at the end of a ridge of Ardingley Sandstone with Grinstead Clay to the north-west and Wadhurst Clay to the south-east. Grinstead, Wadhurst and Weald Clay all contain bands of clay ironstone potentially available for iron production. Also found in Weald Clay are thin (5cm) bands of ‘Cyrena’ limestone, a fossiliferous stone formed and deposited in deep-water conditions during the Cretaceous period.
    [Show full text]
  • LILY COX-RICHARD Sculptures the Size of Hailstones 17 February - 12 May 2018
    LCR: In this show, I’m using found objects and sculptures I’ve made and The 2018 Cell Series is generously supported by trying to put them in positions where they can slip between multiple McGinnis Family Fund of Communities Foundation of Texas systems. In addition to lightning rods and scrap copper, I’m working on with additional funding from new sculptures that could fit in your hand. The “hail scale” is used to Susie and Joe Clack measure the size of hailstones by comparing them to common objects like Gene and Marsha Gray a walnut, golf ball, or teacup: hailstones the size of ____. Your earlier Amy and Patrick Kelly questions about context are really important here—what might be enor- mous for a hailstone might be a very modest size for a sculpture. Talking Sally and Robert Porter about the weather is often considered banal, but lately, the weather has been urgently claiming a lot more space for discussion. What happens when we ignore an important conversation or dismiss small talk (or small Past Cell Series artists: sculptures)? I’m interested in zooming in on details and giving them a lot DENNY PICKETT - 2008 | JEFFREY BROSK - 2009 | RANDY BACON - 2009 of space and attention. JOHN FROST - 2009 | NANCY LAMB - 2010 | JOHN ROBERT CRAFT - 2010 TERRI THORNTON - 2010 | ANNE ALLEN - 2011 | WILL HENRY - 2011 The sculptures the size of hailstones will sit on a large plaster plinth that ERIC ZIMMERMAN - 2011 | BILL DAVENPORT - 2012 | JUSTIN BOYD - 2012 has woven basket forms embedded in it, forming niches and craters. Often CAROL BENSON - 2012 | KANA HARADA - 2013 | BRAD TUCKER - 2013 pedestals and plinths are made to blend into their surroundings; but of ANTHONY SONNENBERG - 2013 | CHRIS SAUTER - 2014 course, they can never disappear.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation
    State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II thus defined on the basis of criteria I and III and UNITED KINGDOM ultimately criterion II. In this connection ICOMOS would like to recall that already in the 12th century Stonehenge, Avebury and Stonehenge was considered as one of the wonders of the world by the chroniclers Henry de Huntington Associated Sites and Geoffrey de Monmouth and that in the 17th century, Stonehenge was the focus of a study by Brief description the great architect Inigo Jones. Stonehenge and Avebury, in Wiltshire, are among The early and unwavering interest for this the most famous groups of megaliths in the world. megalithic ensemble which serves as a benchmark, The two sanctuaries consist of circles of menhirs has left its mark upon historiography, the evolution arranged in a pattern whose astronomical of architectural theories and the progress of significance is still being explored. These holy prehistoric sciences. places and the nearby Neolithic sites are an incomparable testimony to prehistoric times. Committee Decision Bureau (1986): The Bureau requested the United 1. Introduction Kingdom authorities to study possible solution to the problem of the A 344 main road crossing the Year(s) of Inscription 1986 avenue at Stonehenge (detour, digging of a tunnel, Agency responsible for site management etc.). It would be desirable for the Committee to be informed of the progress of these studies at its next • Mailing Address(es) meeting. English Heritage - Stonehenge The Close 65 Committee (1986): The Committee noted with SP1 2EN Salisbury satisfaction the assurances provided by the Wiltshire authorities of the United Kingdom that the closure United Kingdom of the road which crosses the avenue at e-mail: [email protected] Stonehenge was receiving serious consideration as part of the overall plans for the future management website: www.english-heritage.org.uk/stonehenge of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • NDP Steering Minutes 060317
    Minutes GOUDHURST PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN GROUP Steering Committee (SC) Meeting # 06 Monday March 6, 2017 7.45 pm Present: Anthony Harris(AH), John Leavens(JL), Barbara Stafford (BS), Victoria Aldwinkle (VA), Colin Willis (CW), Craig Broom (CB), Richard Hillier (RH), Susan Newsam (SN), Alan Foster (AF), Jo Hinde (JH) Victoria Aldwinkle (VA), Peter Rolington (PR). 1. Apologies Ed Bates (EB), Linda Hall (LH), Jim Boot (JB), John Leavens (JL), Peter Rollington (PR) 2. A Developer’s View Dave Hugget (DH) (Persimon Homes) provided the group with a view of Goudhurst from the perspective of a major housebuilder. Dave noted that NDP’s were becoming more commonplace and developers were becoming more actively involved in the consultation phase of the NDP process and challenging where necessary. NDPs sit below local and national plans and NDP alignment with wider plans is the principal area of challenge. Another area is EU directives for example ecology, SSI’s etc. TWBC have historically seen Tunbridge Wells and Paddock Wood taking the majority of development with previous plans allocating only 360 new houses across all villages. Although numbers were now larger DH was of the view that the overall proportions would not dramatically change. DH felt that the geography, surroundings etc. of Goudhurst and TWBC’s historic view of the village would not make it a viable centre for development (Cranbrook is our local Rural Centre) and that, as a consequence, the major housebuilders were unlikely to target Goudhurst for development. DH emphasised that the NDP should deliver Positive Planning and understanding how development could be assessed (criteria) and supported - for example in the allocation of sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture
    International Journal of Advance Industrial Engineering E-ISSN 2320 –5539 ©2018 INPRESSCO®, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijaie/ Research Article Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture * ^* # M.H Abdella , A.E Musa and S.B Ali #Department of Leather Engineering, School of Industrial Engineering and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum – Sudan ^Department of Leather Technology, College of Applied and Industrial Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum – Sudan Received 01 April 2018, Accepted 01 June 2018, Available online 05 June 2018, Vol.6, No.2 (June 2018) Abstract The retanning process is a very important step in leather manufacturing because it overcomes some of the disadvantages of chrome tannage and it can contributes to further stabilization of collagen fibers and good handle of leather, such as fullness, softness, elasticity and so on. In order to meet customers’ requirements, a wide variety of retanning agents are used in retanning process viz. vegetable tan and phenolic synthetic/organic tanning materials. Sunt bark, widely distributed in Sudan, has been evaluated for its utilization in the retanning of the leathers. In the present investigation, sunt bark powder has been used for the retanning of wet blue leathers. The effectiveness sunt bark in retanning of wet blue leathers has been compared with wattle retanning. The organoleptic properties of the leathers viz. softness, fullness, grain smoothness, grain tightness (break), general appearance, uniformity of dyeing of sunt bark retanned leather have been evaluated in comparison with wattle retanned leathers. Sunt retanning resulted in leathers with good grain tightness.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Silbury Hill – А Case Study with LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – a CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS
    VI. LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY AND ARCHAEOASTRONOMY INTEGRATING ARCHAEOASTRONOMY Integrating Archaeology: with Landscape ArchaeoastronomySilbury Hill – а Case Study WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – A CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS Abstract Weaknesses in both archaeoastronomy and landscape archaeology can be overcome by their combination. This is demonstrat- ed through a new interpretation of Silbury Hill in Avebury, Wiltshire. If monuments in their local landscape are considered as one choice in a system of alternatives, tests can be devised to intepret the prehistoric builders‘ intentions. This exercise finds that the builders chose a prescriptive arrangement of views of Silbury Hill to simulate a facsimile of the moon entering and returning from the underworld. Key words: dark moon, crescent moon, paired alignments, Silbury Hill, West Kennet Avenue, Beckhampton Avenue, Ave- bury, underworld. Introduction with a level circular summit platform.To date, no con- vincing explanation as to its meaning has been offered. Archaeoastronomy has to move on from the legacy of Archaeologists have long expected that excavating the the Thom paradigm if it is to prove its relevance to sci- interior of the hill would reveal burials or deposited ar- ence (Sims 2006). Over the last three decades the dis- tefacts that would provide the clues to its decoding. In cipline has established robust field methods procedures spite of the many tunnels that have been dug, so much and, in so doing, falsified Thom‘s claim for a prehis- so that the Hill has now to be rescued from imminent toric precision astronomy (Thom 1971; Ruggles 1999; collapse, no burials have been found nor interpretive Hoskin 2001, Belmonte 2006; Schaefer 1993; North breakthroughs made.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.00 Download Free
    This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA 45 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd I 16/07/15 13:00 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd II 16/07/15 13:00 ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY EXCERPTA ARCHAEOLOGICA LEIDENSIA EDITED BY CORRIE BAKELS AND HANS KAMERMANS LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2015 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd III 16/07/15 13:00 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Editor of illustrations: Joanne Porck Copyright 2015 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-822251-2-9 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia can be ordered at: P.J.R. Modderman Stichting Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9514 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd IV 16/07/15 13:00 Contents The stable isotopes 13C and 15N in faunal bone of the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen (Germany): statistical modeling 1 Juliette Funck Thijs van Kolfschoten Hans van der Plicht ‘Trapping the past’? Hunting for remote capture techniques and planned coastal exploitation during MIS 5 at Blombos Cave and Klasies River, South Africa 15 Gerrit L. Dusseldorp Geeske H.J. Langejans A Late Neolithic Single Grave Culture burial from Twello (central Netherlands): environmental setting, burial ritual and contextualisation 29 Lucas Meurkens Roy van Beek Marieke Doorenbosch Harry
    [Show full text]
  • See Biodiversity Evidence Base For
    Tunbridge Wells Borough Biodiversity Evidence Base for Draft Local Plan – Regulation 18 Consultation September 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Part 1 Habitats and Species in Tunbridge Wells borough ...................................................... 2 Designated Areas .............................................................................................................. 2 Sites of Special Scientific Interest Condition .................................................................. 4 Local Wildlife Sites in positive management ................................................................... 4 2. Land use and habitats ................................................................................................... 6 Broad Habitats ............................................................................................................... 8 Semi-natural Habitats................................................................................................... 10 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas and B-Lines ................................................................. 16 3. Species of Principal Importance for conserving Biodiversity ........................................ 20 Appendix 1 – Habitat Types ............................................................................................. 21 Appendix 2 Section 41 species recorded in Tunbridge Wells ..........................................
    [Show full text]