DOCSLIB.ORG

Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II thus defined on the basis of criteria I and III and UNITED KINGDOM ultimately criterion II. In this connection ICOMOS would like to recall that already in the 12th century Stonehenge, Avebury and Stonehenge was considered as one of the wonders of the world by the chroniclers Henry de Huntington Associated Sites and Geoffrey de Monmouth and that in the 17th century, Stonehenge was the focus of a study by Brief description the great architect Inigo Jones. Stonehenge and Avebury, in Wiltshire, are among The early and unwavering interest for this the most famous groups of megaliths in the world. megalithic ensemble which serves as a benchmark, The two sanctuaries consist of circles of menhirs has left its mark upon historiography, the evolution arranged in a pattern whose astronomical of architectural theories and the progress of significance is still being explored. These holy prehistoric sciences. places and the nearby Neolithic sites are an incomparable testimony to prehistoric times. Committee Decision Bureau (1986): The Bureau requested the United 1. Introduction Kingdom authorities to study possible solution to the problem of the A 344 main road crossing the Year(s) of Inscription 1986 avenue at Stonehenge (detour, digging of a tunnel, Agency responsible for site management etc.). It would be desirable for the Committee to be informed of the progress of these studies at its next • Mailing Address(es) meeting. English Heritage - Stonehenge The Close 65 Committee (1986): The Committee noted with SP1 2EN Salisbury satisfaction the assurances provided by the Wiltshire authorities of the United Kingdom that the closure United Kingdom of the road which crosses the avenue at e-mail: [email protected] Stonehenge was receiving serious consideration as part of the overall plans for the future management website: www.english-heritage.org.uk/stonehenge of the site. 2. Statement of Significance • A joint Statement of Significance for Stonehenge and Avebury will be produced in Inscription Criteria C (i) (ii) (iii) 2006 on the basis of the World Heritage values identified in the management plans. The State Justification as provided by the State Party Party will discuss and agree a revised Stonehenge and Avebury are the two most Statement of outstanding universal value which important and characteristic prehistoric monuments will be submitted to the World Heritage in Britain. They represent the henge monument par Committee in due course excellence, as the largest, most evolved and best • No change required to UNESCO's official preserved pre-historic temples of a type unique to description of the site Britain. Together with the associated sites and monuments they provide a landscape without Boundaries and Buffer Zone parallel in Britain or elsewhere and provide an • Status of boundaries of the site: inadequate unrivalled demonstration of human achievement in • Buffer zone: no buffer zone has been defined prehistoric times. • State Party says that further work is needed to define the buffer zone As provided in ICOMOS evaluation Status of Authenticity/Integrity This nomination for the inclusion of the Wiltshire • World Heritage site values have been megalithic sites, which has been expected for maintained several years now, concerns one of the most • A grass restoration scheme has started since obvious potential choices for inclusion on the World 2002 in Stonehenge and Avebury to stop Heritage List and cannot help but meet with the plough damage to prehistoric monuments and enthusiastic approval of ICOMOS, which enhance their setting recommends the inclusion of the cultural property State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II • The Stonehenge Project seeks to restore the contractual agreement between the State Party integrity of the site by removing the roads and and a third party; consensual management moving current visitor facilities • Dept.for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (defra) grants to farmers for grass restoration; National Trust looks after Avebury on behalf of 3. Protection State Party; ownership by the National Trust of Legislative and Administrative Arrangements large parts of the WHS, including some • Specific local planning policies to protect inalienable land against adverse development: (Salisbury Local • Levels of public authority who are primarily Plan, Kennet Local Plan 2004, HH3). The involved with the management of the site: Stonehenge WHS management plan was national; local adopted as supplementary planning guidance. • Other levels: English Heritage, National Trust, Statutory designations for conservation of the Highways Agency, Department for Culture, historic environment, nature conservation and Media and Sport, Department for Environment, landscape: scheduled monuments, listed Food and Rural Affairs, English Nature, RSPB, buildings and other designations Ministry of Defence • The protection arrangements are considered Wiltshire County Council, Salisbury District sufficiently effective Council and Kennet District Council (planning authorities) and the parish councils Actions taken/proposed: • The current management system is sufficiently • Implementation of actions set out in the effective management plans: recommendations in the management plans e.g. more funding, regular Actions proposed: monitoring of monument condition. On a • Long-term funding for WHS management is national level, PPG15 does not give statutory needed protection to cultural World Heritage sites, A more hands-on approach to management of which seem less well protected than ecological the monuments is needed. Timeframe: not sites. A review of heritage protection (HPR) is known also being undertaken • National, regional and local levels of action. 5. Management Plan Timeframe: various • Management plan is being implemented 4. Management • There are two management plans for this World Heritage site. Use of site/property Implementation date: Stonehenge April 2000. • Visitor attraction, religious use, rural landscape Avebury August 2005. • Military camp residential quarters in Revised: Stonehenge none yet, planned in Stonehenge WHS. Access to Avebury is free, 2005-06; Avebury- first revision completed charge for the museum only. Religious use is August 2005. new age and pagan When was current version completed - Stonehenge 2005; Avebury August 2005. Management/Administrative Body • Effective • Steering group formally set up: There are two • Responsibility for over-seeing the steering groups, one for the Stonehenge part of implementation of the management plan and the World Heritage site and one for the Avebury monitoring its effectiveness: Stonehenge: WHS part. Stonehenge and Avebury are 40 km apart steering committee and coordinator. Avebury: and have different stakeholders. WHS steering committee and coordinator Steering Groups set up as follows: STONEHENGE - November 1998 AVEBURY – 1989 6. Financial Resources Their role is to oversee the preparation, Financial situation implementation and review of the WHS • English Heritage, National Trust, DEFRA grants management plan to farmers for grass restoration, UK government • Site manager on full-time basis funds A303 road scheme, Heritage Lottery • Management by the State Party; management Fund, fundraising campaigns, local authorities under protective legislation; management under (English Heritage (curators, visitor operations, State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II grass management, security), National Trust National Trust estate: paths and information staff (including property manager, museum boards. curator in Avebury), Salisbury District Council AVEBURY: museum and interpretation centre, (planners), Wiltshire County Council tourist shops, restaurant, toilets, car parks, pub, (archaeologists), Kennet District Council site interpretation boards, website. • Funding drawn in through World Heritage Fund • Visitor facilities are inadequate • National and/or regional projects of UNDP, the World Bank or other agencies; Bi-lateral • Visitor needs: cooperation; Other assistance: DEFRA's grants STONEHENGE: larger car and coach park, are part funded by EU information/exhibition space, more information • Insufficient on monuments in the landscape, room for • Need for long-term funding for the WHS school groups, larger ticketing area, larger coordinators posts. shop, more toilets, indoor café with comfortable seating. 7. Staffing Levels AVEBURY: more toilet facilities, public transport links and car parking. • Number of staff: 2 • There is a tourism/visitor management plan for • Access to other staff: Grass management and the site (covered in the WHS management plan) paint removal experts at English Heritage Rate of access to adequate professional staff 10. Scientific Studies across the following disciplines: • There is an agreed research • Good: conservation, management, promotion, framework/strategy for the site visitor management • Monitoring exercises, condition surveys, • Average: interpretation, education archaeological surveys, visitor management, • Staff resources are adequate transportation studies, interpretation • Volunteers: STONEHENGE - 2 NT • STONEHENGE & AVEBURY: Monument archaeological wardens monitoring the Condition Survey (Avebury 1999, Stonehenge prehistoric monuments and 3 long term 2002), aerial and field walking surveys of areas volunteers helping with access, media, local to be reverted to pasture since 2002, WHS community monitoring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magazine Summer 2011 Plan Your Walk
    magazine summer 2011 magazine summer 2011 Southern England Southern England 09 Land’s End Peninsula, Cornwall 10 Avebury, Wiltshire 12/05/2011 16:30 l Distance 22½km/14 miles l Time 7hrs l Type Coast l Distance 18km/11 miles l Time 6½hrs l Type Countryside NAVIGATION FITNESS NAVIGATION FITNESS 1 LEVEL 1 2/3 LEVEL 2/3 2 LEVEL 2 2 LEVEL 2 feature p61 Plan your walk Plan your walk SEE Newquay l Cheltenham Redruth Gloucester Oxford St Ives l l CORNWALL Swindon l Penzance P Bristol Reading Falmouth N l TRO L Bath AVEBURY ORGA AR LAND’S END B A PENINSULA N EVE M O Landewednack T Salisbury HY: S HY: HY: FI HY: P P WHERE: Linear walk from WHERE: Circular walk from Gurnard’s Head to Sennen To find great accommodation, visit Avebury, Wiltshire. Cove via Cape Cornwall. www.ramblers.org.uk/accommodation START/END: The Red Lion, PHOTOGRA PHOTOGRA START: Gurnard’s Head Avebury (SU103699). (SW436376). Of all Cornwall’s wonderful sides of the peninsula, taking in TERRAIN: Unmarked but Taking in the first section of the cloak optional). At the end of END: Sennen Cove coastline, stretches of the north rugged cliffs, mining relics, splendid straightforward footpaths Great Stones Way, this ‘taster’ the field, cross two stiles and (SW355263). coast and the Land’s End headlands and beautiful coves. over open, chalky farmland route starts and ends inside continue beside the road, TERRAIN: Rugged coastal Peninsula must share first prize with plenty of historic the prehistoric stone circle at keeping to the L of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Silbury Hill – А Case Study with LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – a CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS
    VI. LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY AND ARCHAEOASTRONOMY INTEGRATING ARCHAEOASTRONOMY Integrating Archaeology: with Landscape ArchaeoastronomySilbury Hill – а Case Study WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – A CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS Abstract Weaknesses in both archaeoastronomy and landscape archaeology can be overcome by their combination. This is demonstrat- ed through a new interpretation of Silbury Hill in Avebury, Wiltshire. If monuments in their local landscape are considered as one choice in a system of alternatives, tests can be devised to intepret the prehistoric builders‘ intentions. This exercise finds that the builders chose a prescriptive arrangement of views of Silbury Hill to simulate a facsimile of the moon entering and returning from the underworld. Key words: dark moon, crescent moon, paired alignments, Silbury Hill, West Kennet Avenue, Beckhampton Avenue, Ave- bury, underworld. Introduction with a level circular summit platform.To date, no con- vincing explanation as to its meaning has been offered. Archaeoastronomy has to move on from the legacy of Archaeologists have long expected that excavating the the Thom paradigm if it is to prove its relevance to sci- interior of the hill would reveal burials or deposited ar- ence (Sims 2006). Over the last three decades the dis- tefacts that would provide the clues to its decoding. In cipline has established robust field methods procedures spite of the many tunnels that have been dug, so much and, in so doing, falsified Thom‘s claim for a prehis- so that the Hill has now to be rescued from imminent toric precision astronomy (Thom 1971; Ruggles 1999; collapse, no burials have been found nor interpretive Hoskin 2001, Belmonte 2006; Schaefer 1993; North breakthroughs made.
    [Show full text]
  • Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan
    Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan Burbage Parish 2017 - 2026 Post Regulation 14 Additional Consultation Draft January 2017 Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan Contents 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Area Covered by the Plan 5 The Burbage NDP has been prepared by the 3.0 Executive Summary 6 local community under powers 4.0 Evidence Base 10 granted by the Localism Act 5.0 Planning Policy Context 12 2011. 6.0 Physical, Social and Economic Context 15 The 7.0 Vision of the Plan 22 Neighbourhood Plan will sit alongside the 8.0 Main Objectives of the Plan and Non-Land Use Aspirations 23 Wiltshire Core Strategy as a 9.0 Policies of the Plan 24 part of the overall Development 10.0 Non-Planning Actions 43 Plan for Wiltshire. 11.0 Monitoring 44 It will help guide and manage development in the Parish of Appendix 1 Evidence Base per Section Burbage until 2026. Appendix 2 Housing Needs Survey Appendix 3 Burbage and the AONB Appendix 4 Burbage and Flood Risk Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Glossary of Terms Acronym or Term Definition BNDP Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan CA Community Area Community Initial community engagement survey of 2014 Engagement Survey HRA Habitat Regulations Assessment LDF Local Development Framework LoD Limit of development (e.g. village boundary) LPA Local Planning Authority (Wiltshire Council) NDP Neighbourhood Development Plan NPPF National Planning Policy Framework - 'The Framework' sets out planning policies for England and how they are expected to be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development and Climate Change
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE Author: Victoria Bradford, Policy and Information Researcher, CLES (0161) 233 1927 [email protected] INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE As such, the purpose of this research is to identify to what extent the Stern Review and The recently published Stern Review1 has set mitigation of the effects of climate change are out a key challenge for central and local influencing or should influence economic government in terms of the economic impact development activity in the UK, at the that climate change will have on the local, national, local and regional level. This national and global economy. research assesses the strategic lead played by economic development departments on The review demonstrates that ignoring climate climate change strategies, and wider change will damage economic growth. At its corporate environmental sustainability policies. heart is the concept that tackling climate It is also designed to assess the extent to change is the pro-growth strategy for the which economic development departments are longer term, with Stern and his fellow author’s involved in taking action to reduce the impact arguing that it can be done in a way that does of climate change on business activity as well not cap the aspirations for growth of rich, or as highlighting and promoting the economic poor, countries. The earlier effective action is benefits that can be gained from taking taken, the less costly it will be. Without action action, e.g. resource consumption and to address climate change, over the coming developing new energy technologies. It will few decades we risk major disruption to also look at the role that economic economic and social activity, on a scale similar development, together with spatial planning is to those associated with the great wars and playing in reducing the impact of climate the economic depression of the first half of the change on the economy of the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Analysis of a Possible Prehistoric
    OS Grid Ref: TQ 57045 39336 ‘Analysis Of A Possible Prehistoric Tumulus And Related Monuments – Rusthall, Kent’ By Nigel T Stapple BSc (Hons) – Landscape investigator, WKDArchaeology March 2019 Photo: SW view of the Rusthall ‘Tumulus’ - Tunbridge Wells Golf Club (Jan 2019) Disclaimer: This review is not intended as a definitive statement as to the validity of the proposed archaeology. It merely offers one possible interpretation of the landscape features in the absence of an unequivocal modern context. More so, this review is not presented as an academic paper nor implied as such. The views expressed are the authors own and subject to broad interpretation. All research & photos ©N T Stapple unless otherwise stated. Introduction Preliminary research began back in 2017 at two areas of interest in Rusthall. The author became intrigued be an isolated sandstone outcrop close to the junction of Rusthall Road and Langton Road, near the house known as ‘Dingly Dell’. Surviving in a heavily modified post medieval landscape, its presence, in the modern landscape, seemed unusual. Measuring approximately 5m x 1.5m x 1m, above ground, it showed clear evidence of being quarried. Given its form and size the author postulated that it may have in fact been the remains of a former standing stone, preserved in antiquity. This hypothesis was later backed up by confirmation of a large pit found at the western end of the stone and visible as a parch mark in 2018. [Fig 1.]. This was thought to be a ‘slot’ for the ‘standing’ stone. Figure 1: Rusthall 'Standing Stone' - Summer 2018 Information regarding the stone had previously been presented to Kent County Council (KCC) representatives and the stone is documented in several of the authors earlier reviews of on-going research.
    [Show full text]
  • Silbury Hill & Avebury Circle, Wiltshire
    Silbury Hill & Avebury Circle, Wiltshire Place To Visit Location & Access: Avebury is located at SU 102 699. It can be accessed via the A4 from Marlborough (6 miles to the east), the A4361 from Swindon (10 miles to the north east), the A361 from Devizes (8 miles to the south west), and the A4 from Calne (6 miles to the west). There is a National Trust car park at Avebury. Buses runs from Marlborough and Calne (service 42) and from Swindon and Devizes (service 49). Silbury is located at SU 099 686. It can be accessed via the A4 road, roughly halfway between Marlborough and Calne. There is a car park and viewpoint next to Silbury on the A4. Avebury South West Quadrant Key Geography: World Heritage Site containing a prehistoric chalk mound, Neolithic stone barrow, Neolithic henge and stone circle. Sarsen sandstone. Description: Silbury Hill is part of the sacred landscape of Neolithic and Bronze Age ceremonial sites centred on Avebury. It is the world’s largest prehistoric chalk-built mound, constructed between 2450 and 2350 BC. Although it is only 31 metres high, the whole of nearby Stonehenge would fit on the flattened top with plenty of room to spare. A huge ditch surrounds the feature, and digging it provided the soil and chalk to build the mound. Although it is not possible to climb Silbury, it is easily accessible from a nearby car park and viewpoint. However, the best way to approach this unusual historic feature is a two mile stroll along a footpath from Avebury village.
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council Opposing Its Plans for the Future of Wiltshire
    An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council opposing its plans for the future of Wiltshire Address for reply: CPRE Office Lansdowne House Long Street Devizes Wiltshire SN10 1NJ To Mr Andrew Kerr Chief Executive Wiltshire Council County Hall Trowbridge Wilts BA14 8JN. Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy Dear Mr Kerr We the undersigned organisations have studied Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy and have concluded that it does not represent a coherent plan for the future of West and North Wiltshire to 2026 and beyond. Last year we were led to believe that the abolition of regional allocations for building new homes in the county would allow us to decide how much development we wanted in Wiltshire and where we wanted it. Today we find that the massive housing estates and retail parks have not shrunk back from the green field sites where the developers would like to build them. Twenty thousand new homes and something like a square kilometre of industrial estates are planned for North and West Wilts by 2026 – homes and jobs for another 50,000 people. We question fundamentally whether this model of expansion can bring the economic growth the council expects, while also meeting the needs of existing communities in an area where transport, education and health services are already struggling to meet demand. Clearly, past planning policies have not worked, yet the Council’s Core Strategy is proposing more of the same: • More decline of town centres • More characterless car-based suburbia • More traffic, congestion, noise and pollution in both towns and villages • More damage to the natural environment and loss of agricultural land • More overloaded services Rather than reproduce these outdated policies in the blueprint for the next 15 years, we ask the council to think again and give us: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and Meaning in the Structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK Timothy Darvill
    Houses of the Holy: architecture and meaning in the structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK Timothy Darvill Timothy Darvill is Professor of Archaeology in the Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Bournemouth University, UK. His research interests lie in the Neolithic of Northwest Europe and in archaeological resource management, and he has carried out fieldwork in Germany, Russia, Malta, England, Wales, and the Isle of Man. In 2008, together with Geoff Wainwright, he undertook excavations inside the stone circles at Stonehenge as part of ongoing research into the links between Stonehenge and the sources of the Bluestones in the Preseli Hills of southwest Wales. He is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Time & Mind. [email protected]. Abstract Stonehenge in central southern England is internationally known. Recent re-evaluations of its date and construction sequence provides an opportunity to review the meaning and purpose of key structural components. Here it is argued that the central stone structures did not have a single purpose but rather embody a series of symbolic representations. During the early third millennium this included a square-in- circle motif representing a sacred house or ‘big house’ edged by the five Sarsen Trilithons. During the late third millennium BC, as house styles changed, some of the stones were re-arranged to form a central oval setting that perpetuated the idea of the a sacred dwelling. The Sarsen Circle may have embodied a time- reckoning system based on the lunar month. From about 2500 BC more than 80 bluestones were brought to the site from sources in the Preseli Hills of west Wales about 220km distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Rural Communities a Call for Action March 2008
    Rural Services Network Sustaining Rural Communities A Call for Action March 2008 Rural Services Network Delivering Rural Services We would all like to be part of a safe, prosperous and healthy community. community where everyone has the right to the same opportunities, freedom and respect. Somewhere we can be proud of. www.communities.gov.uk In May 2007, the Rural Services Network, a coalition of 250 public and private service providers, conducted a consultation exercise on the challenges facing rural communities. The responses to that consultation have shown that many of our rural communities do not deliver this quality of life. Improving on this position requires a clear call for action, which focuses the efforts of all those involved in the provision of services on the most significant challenges on the road ahead. Having considered and codified the response to the consultation, the Rural Services Network identifies the following as being of critical importance to the future sustainability of towns, villages and settlements in the countryside: ffordable Housing Successive government reviews have identified the availability of affordable housing as one of the most important needs of families and communities across England and Wales. This need is acute in many rural communities. Without the right mix of housing stock, the social and demographic mix of our rural communities is undermined. This has impacts on the workforce available to service public and private sector employers. School rolls decline and their existence, together with other local services, become increasingly unsustainable. We welcome the Taylor inquiry2 into affordable rural housing, in particular, the emerging proposals to allow small rural communities to take the lead in new provision, and to use the land use planning system to release and designate land.
    [Show full text]