Economic Development and Climate Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Justification for Areas of High Landscape Value
The South Tyneside Local Plan Justification for extending the High Landscape Value boundary southwards on the South Tyneside Coast and amendment to proposed Boldon Downhill Area of High Landscape Value (July 2019) 2 To find out more about the Local Plan, please contact: Spatial Planning Team Development Services South Tyneside Council Town Hall and Civic Offices, Westoe Road South Shields, Tyne & Wear NE33 2RL Telephone: (0191) 424 7688 E-mail: [email protected] Visit: www.southtyneside.info/planning If you know someone who would like this information in a different format contact the communications team on (0191) 424 7385 1.1 This paper provides evidence to support the extension of The Coast: Area of High Landscape Value as proposed in the draft Local Plan (2019). The justification has been provided by the Council’s Senior Landscape Architect. 1.2 The South Tyneside Landscape Character Study Part 3 (2012) argued the case for the original area of High Landscape Value along the coastline. The area of coast originally recommended for inclusion in the landscape designation ran from Trow Point to Whitburn Coastal Park (See Fig.1). The southern boundary has been drawn to include Whitburn Coastal Park, and followed the edge of the Shearwater housing estate. However, the boundary was drawn to exclude the coastline further south. 1.3 The Council feel that there is merit in extending the candidate Coast Area of High Landscape Value and that there is justification for the area south of Whitburn Coastal Park to City of Sunderland Boundary being included this within the proposed designation. -
Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation
State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II thus defined on the basis of criteria I and III and UNITED KINGDOM ultimately criterion II. In this connection ICOMOS would like to recall that already in the 12th century Stonehenge, Avebury and Stonehenge was considered as one of the wonders of the world by the chroniclers Henry de Huntington Associated Sites and Geoffrey de Monmouth and that in the 17th century, Stonehenge was the focus of a study by Brief description the great architect Inigo Jones. Stonehenge and Avebury, in Wiltshire, are among The early and unwavering interest for this the most famous groups of megaliths in the world. megalithic ensemble which serves as a benchmark, The two sanctuaries consist of circles of menhirs has left its mark upon historiography, the evolution arranged in a pattern whose astronomical of architectural theories and the progress of significance is still being explored. These holy prehistoric sciences. places and the nearby Neolithic sites are an incomparable testimony to prehistoric times. Committee Decision Bureau (1986): The Bureau requested the United 1. Introduction Kingdom authorities to study possible solution to the problem of the A 344 main road crossing the Year(s) of Inscription 1986 avenue at Stonehenge (detour, digging of a tunnel, Agency responsible for site management etc.). It would be desirable for the Committee to be informed of the progress of these studies at its next • Mailing Address(es) meeting. English Heritage - Stonehenge The Close 65 Committee (1986): The Committee noted with SP1 2EN Salisbury satisfaction the assurances provided by the Wiltshire authorities of the United Kingdom that the closure United Kingdom of the road which crosses the avenue at e-mail: [email protected] Stonehenge was receiving serious consideration as part of the overall plans for the future management website: www.english-heritage.org.uk/stonehenge of the site. -
2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date. -
Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan
Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan Burbage Parish 2017 - 2026 Post Regulation 14 Additional Consultation Draft January 2017 Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan Contents 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Area Covered by the Plan 5 The Burbage NDP has been prepared by the 3.0 Executive Summary 6 local community under powers 4.0 Evidence Base 10 granted by the Localism Act 5.0 Planning Policy Context 12 2011. 6.0 Physical, Social and Economic Context 15 The 7.0 Vision of the Plan 22 Neighbourhood Plan will sit alongside the 8.0 Main Objectives of the Plan and Non-Land Use Aspirations 23 Wiltshire Core Strategy as a 9.0 Policies of the Plan 24 part of the overall Development 10.0 Non-Planning Actions 43 Plan for Wiltshire. 11.0 Monitoring 44 It will help guide and manage development in the Parish of Appendix 1 Evidence Base per Section Burbage until 2026. Appendix 2 Housing Needs Survey Appendix 3 Burbage and the AONB Appendix 4 Burbage and Flood Risk Post-Reg.14 Additional Consultation Draft Glossary of Terms Acronym or Term Definition BNDP Burbage Neighbourhood Development Plan CA Community Area Community Initial community engagement survey of 2014 Engagement Survey HRA Habitat Regulations Assessment LDF Local Development Framework LoD Limit of development (e.g. village boundary) LPA Local Planning Authority (Wiltshire Council) NDP Neighbourhood Development Plan NPPF National Planning Policy Framework - 'The Framework' sets out planning policies for England and how they are expected to be applied. -
Para Swimming Records Short Course As At
Scottish National Para-Swimming Records Short Course (25m) Mens Classification Time Name Representation Date Venue 50m FREESTYLE S1 VACANT S2 01:08.77 Jim ANDERSON Broxburn ASC 26/08/2004 Manchester 01:08.77 Jim ANDERSON Broxburn ASC 19/04/2008 Glenrothes S3 00:55.55 Kenny CAIRNS 23/10/2005 Sheffield S4 00:47.77 Paul JOHNSTON 26/04/1997 Glenrothes S5 00:36.06 Andrew Mullen City of Glasgow ST 11/11/2017 Sheffield S6 00:39.82 Alasdair McARTHUR Helensburgh ASC 10/12/2005 Glenrothes S7 00:31.20 Andrew LINDSAY INCAS 07/11/2004 Sheffield S8 00:28.08 Sean FRASER Warrender Baths 22/11/2009 Sheffield S9 00:27.58 Stefan HOGGAN Carnegie SC 13/12/2013 Edinburgh S10 00:26.59 Oliver Carter University of Stirling 21/09/2019 Glasgow S11 00:29.74 Jim MUIRHEAD BBS record S12 00:24.37 Stephen Clegg City of Sunderland 07/12/2018 Edinburgh S13 00:25.23 Stephen CLEGG East Lothian ST 25/10/2015 Glenrothes S14 00:24.94 Louis Lawlor City of Glasgow ST 08/12/2018 Edinburgh 100m FREESTYLE S1 VACANT S2 02:24.63 Jim ANDERSON Broxburn ASC 03/11/2007 Sheffield S3 01:58.05 Kenny CAIRNS 22/10/2005 Sheffield S4 01:46.86 Paul JOHNSTON 30/10/1999 Sheffield S5 01:18.26 Andrew MULLEN REN96 22/11/2014 Manchester S6 01:31.89 Alasdair McARTHUR Helensburgh ASC 22/10/2005 Sheffield S7 01:08.00 Andrew LINDSAY INCAS 03/11/2007 Sheffield S8 01:00.64 Sean FRASER Warrender Baths 20/11/2010 Sheffield S9 01:00.35 Stefan HOGGAN Carnegie SC 24/11/2012 Sheffield S10 00:57.27 Oliver Carter University of Stirling 11/11/2018 Sheffield S11 01:05.46 Jim MUIRHEAD BBS record S12 00:52.31 Stephen -
FOI 158-19 Data-Infographic-V2.Indd
Domicile: Population: Approved, England, means-tested Wales & students, under 25, estranged [1] Northern from their Ireland parents Total: Academic Year: Count of students by provider 2017/18 8080 Manchester Metropolitan University 220 Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) 170 De Montfort University (DMU) 150 Leeds Beckett University 150 University Of Wolverhampton 140 Nottingham Trent University 140 University Of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) 140 Sheeld Hallam University 140 University Of Salford 140 Coventry University 130 Northumbria University Newcastle 130 Teesside University 130 Middlesex University 120 Birmingham City University (BCU) 120 University Of East London (UEL) 120 Kingston University 110 University Of Derby 110 University Of Portsmouth 100 University Of Hertfordshire 100 Anglia Ruskin University 100 University Of Kent 100 University Of West Of England (UWE) 100 University Of Westminster 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 1. “Estranged” means the customer has ticked the “You are irreconcilably estranged (have no contact with) from your parents and this will not change” box on their application. 2. Results rounded to nearest 10 customers 3. Where number of customers is less than 20 at any provider this has been shown as * 1 FOI | Estranged students data by HEP, academic year 201718 [158-19] Plymouth University 90 Bangor University 40 University Of Huddersfield 90 Aberystwyth University 40 University Of Hull 90 Aston University 40 University Of Brighton 90 University Of York 40 Staordshire University 80 Bath Spa University 40 Edge Hill -
REDACTED VERSION Port of Sunderland Emergency Plan New Issue Original 01.03.2013
PROTECT – FOR LOCAL RESILIENCE USE ONLY 1 Port Emergency Plan Please note that this is a redacted version for Internet publication. Certain details have been removed on security, privacy and operational grounds. Port of Sunderland Capstan House Greenwells Quay South Docks Barrack Street Sunderland Tyne and Wear SR1 2BU New issue: 1st March, 2013 Port of Sunderland Emergency Plan: New issue (original) 01/03/2013 PROTECT – FOR LOCAL RESILIENCE USE ONLY 2 CONTENTS PART I – INTRODUCTION 6 1.0 SCOPE OF PLAN 6 2.0 OBJECTIVES OF PLAN 6 3.0 PORT JURISDICTION 6 3.2 Sunderland Marina 8 3.3 Port of Sunderland Profile 8 4.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9 4.1 Harbour Master 9 4.2 Local Port Services (LPS) 9 4.3 Dangerous substances 9 4.3.1 Vessel bunkering operations 10 4.4 Explosives 10 4.5 Pollution 10 4.6 Flooding 10 4.7 Medical emergencies 10 4.7.1 Cardiac emergencies 11 4.8 Media 11 5.0 EMERGENCY 11 5.2 Declaration of emergency 12 6.0 MAJOR INCIDENT 13 6.3 Application to National Health Service 14 6.4 Major Incident – Three stage declaration procedure 14 Port of Sunderland Emergency Plan: New issue (original) 01/03/2013 PROTECT – FOR LOCAL RESILIENCE USE ONLY 3 7.0 INTERFACE - OTHER EMERGENCY & CONTINGENCY PLANS 14 8.0 COMMAND AND CONTROL 15 8.1(a) Port of Sunderland 15 8.1(b) Northumbria Police 16 8.1(c) Tyne and Wear Fire and Rescue Service 16 8.1(d) North East Ambulance Service NHS Trust 16 8.1(e) HM Coastguard 16 8.1(f) Sunderland City Council 17 8.1(g) Towage and Mooring 17 8.1(h) Other agencies and organisations 17 9.0 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT 18 -
Colleges Mergers 1993 to Date
Colleges mergers 1993 to date This spreadsheet contains details of colleges that were established under the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act and subsequently merged Sources: Learning and Skills Council, Government Education Departments, Association of Colleges College mergers under the Further Education Funding Council (FEFC) (1993-2001) Colleges Name of merged institution Local LSC area Type of merger Operative date 1 St Austell Sixth Form College and Mid-Cornwall College St Austell College Cornwall Double dissolution 02-Apr-93 Cleveland College of Further Education and Sir William Turner's Sixth 2 Cleveland Tertiary College Tees Valley Double dissolution 01-Sep-93 Form College 3 The Ridge College and Margaret Danyers College, Stockport Ridge Danyers College Greater Manchester Double dissolution 15-Aug-95 4 Acklam Sixth Form College and Kirby College of Further Education Middlesbrough College Tees Valley Double dissolution 01-Aug-95 5 Longlands College of Further Education and Marton Sixth Form College Teesside Tertiary College Tees Valley Double dissolution 01-Aug-95 St Philip's Roman Catholic Sixth Form College and South Birmingham 6 South Birmingham College Birmingham & Solihull Single dissolution (St Philips) 01-Aug-95 College North Warwickshire and Hinckley 7 Hinckley College and North Warwickshire College for Technology and Art Coventry & Warwickshire Double dissolution 01-Mar-96 College Mid-Warwickshire College and Warwickshire College for Agriculture, Warwickshire College, Royal 8 Coventry & Warwickshire Single dissolution -
Core Strategy and Development Plan Infrastructure Delivery Plan Updated December 2018
Core Strategy and Development Plan Infrastructure Delivery Plan Updated December 2018 Planning Policy Section Sunderland City Council Civic Centre Sunderland SR2 7DN 0191 561 1574 [email protected] Urban Vision Partnership Ltd. Civic Centre Chorley Road Swinton Salford M27 5AS Document History Revision ref Amendments Date issued Early Draft Infrastructure 14 October 2016 Delivery Plan v0.1 Draft Infrastructure Delivery 07 July 2017 Plan v0.1 Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.1 (7 July 2017) 25 July 2017 Plan v0.2 Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.2 (25 July 2017) 27 July 2017 Plan v0.3 Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.3 (7, 14 & 15 19 March 2018 Plan v0.4 March 2018) Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.4 (following 4 May 2018 Plan v0.5 external comments received in April 2018) Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.5 16 May 2018 Plan v0.6 Draft Infrastructure Delivery Client feedback on v0.6 4 June 2018 Plan v0.7 Notice This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Sunderland City Council and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Sunderland City Council or Urban Vision Partnership Ltd, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Urban Vision Partnership Ltd for any use of this report, other than the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Urban Vision Partnership Ltd using due skill, care and diligence in preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. -
An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council Opposing Its Plans for the Future of Wiltshire
An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council opposing its plans for the future of Wiltshire Address for reply: CPRE Office Lansdowne House Long Street Devizes Wiltshire SN10 1NJ To Mr Andrew Kerr Chief Executive Wiltshire Council County Hall Trowbridge Wilts BA14 8JN. Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy Dear Mr Kerr We the undersigned organisations have studied Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy and have concluded that it does not represent a coherent plan for the future of West and North Wiltshire to 2026 and beyond. Last year we were led to believe that the abolition of regional allocations for building new homes in the county would allow us to decide how much development we wanted in Wiltshire and where we wanted it. Today we find that the massive housing estates and retail parks have not shrunk back from the green field sites where the developers would like to build them. Twenty thousand new homes and something like a square kilometre of industrial estates are planned for North and West Wilts by 2026 – homes and jobs for another 50,000 people. We question fundamentally whether this model of expansion can bring the economic growth the council expects, while also meeting the needs of existing communities in an area where transport, education and health services are already struggling to meet demand. Clearly, past planning policies have not worked, yet the Council’s Core Strategy is proposing more of the same: • More decline of town centres • More characterless car-based suburbia • More traffic, congestion, noise and pollution in both towns and villages • More damage to the natural environment and loss of agricultural land • More overloaded services Rather than reproduce these outdated policies in the blueprint for the next 15 years, we ask the council to think again and give us: 1. -
Sunderland: the Challenges of the Future
Sunderland: The Challenges of the Future A report prepared by Centre for Cities for Sunderland City Council January 2009 Dr Malcolm Cooper Introduction Sunderland is a Partner City in the Centre for Cities research programme ‘Unlocking City Potential and Sustaining City Growth’. The programme works closely with a small group of cities to inform economic development strategies and improve economic performance. This report sets out policy analysis and recommendations in response to two principal questions: • How can Sunderland build on a decade of achievement to attain long-term sustainable growth? • What should be the main priorities in formulating an appropriate economic development strategy? Sunderland Great Britain Other services Manufacturing 10.6% 1.1% Manufacturing Other services 2.3% 14.9% Construction 4.9% Public administration, Construction education & health Wholesale activities 4.2% 5.0% 30.5% Wholesale activites 2.5% Public administration, education & health Retail & leisure 26.9% 22.1% Retail & Leisure 20.1% Research, architecture & ofce services Transport & communication 5.1% Research, architecture & 5.9% Transport & communications office services Agriculture & energy Financial & Related 4.7% 6.1% 1.6% Business Services Financial & Related Agriculture & energy 14.2% Business Services 1.9% 15.6% Source: NOMIS 2008 Annual Business Inquiry Employee Analysis (ABI) for 2007 data. Key Recommendations • The phased regeneration of the city centre must be pursued for Sunderland’s economy to return to its recent growth trajectory. • The Working Neighbourhoods Strategy should be pursued along with the introduction of an integrated bus network to bind Sunderland into the wider city region economy. • Policy and financial resources should be invested to create the infrastructure for a local enterprise and innovation network. -
Sustaining Rural Communities a Call for Action March 2008
Rural Services Network Sustaining Rural Communities A Call for Action March 2008 Rural Services Network Delivering Rural Services We would all like to be part of a safe, prosperous and healthy community. community where everyone has the right to the same opportunities, freedom and respect. Somewhere we can be proud of. www.communities.gov.uk In May 2007, the Rural Services Network, a coalition of 250 public and private service providers, conducted a consultation exercise on the challenges facing rural communities. The responses to that consultation have shown that many of our rural communities do not deliver this quality of life. Improving on this position requires a clear call for action, which focuses the efforts of all those involved in the provision of services on the most significant challenges on the road ahead. Having considered and codified the response to the consultation, the Rural Services Network identifies the following as being of critical importance to the future sustainability of towns, villages and settlements in the countryside: ffordable Housing Successive government reviews have identified the availability of affordable housing as one of the most important needs of families and communities across England and Wales. This need is acute in many rural communities. Without the right mix of housing stock, the social and demographic mix of our rural communities is undermined. This has impacts on the workforce available to service public and private sector employers. School rolls decline and their existence, together with other local services, become increasingly unsustainable. We welcome the Taylor inquiry2 into affordable rural housing, in particular, the emerging proposals to allow small rural communities to take the lead in new provision, and to use the land use planning system to release and designate land.