Instruction Guide Series IG7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Instruction Guide Series IG7 Advanced Mine Rescue Training Coal Mines U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration National Mine Health and Safety Academy Instruction Guide Series IG7 Revised 2 0 1 3 Visit the Mine Safety and Health Administration website at www.msha.gov CONTENTS Introduction Your Role as an Instructor Overview Module 1 – Surface Organization Module 2 – Mine Gases Module 3 – Mine Ventilation Module 4 – Exploration Module 5 – Fires, Firefighting, and Explosions Module 6 – Rescue of Survivors and Recovery of Bodies Module 7 – Mine Recovery Page Intentionally Left Blank Introduction Throughout history, miners have traveled underground secure in the knowledge that if disaster strikes and they become trapped in the mine, other miners will make every possible attempt to rescue them. This is the mine rescue tradition. Today’s mine rescue efforts are highly organized operations carried out by groups of trained and skilled individuals who work together as a team. Underground coal mine rescue team members must be trained according to the requirements under 30 CFR 49.18. Under Section 49.18(b)(4), this training must consist of advanced mine rescue training and procedures, as prescribed by MSHA's Office of Educational Policy and Development (EPD). This guide is designed to be used with the material in IG-7a, Advanced Skills Training, and both guides are needed to satisfy the advanced mine rescue training requirement. This guide is divided into self-contained units of study called “modules.” Each module covers a separate subject and includes suggestions, handouts, visuals, and text materials to assist you with training. Since regulations, policy and mining technology can change, be sure to check for information that could supersede this material. Visit MSHA’s website at http://www.msha.gov for additional information and updates. Your Role as an Instructor You are about to assume an important responsibility – that of building and maintaining a capable mine rescue team. What your team members learn during these training sessions could very well help to save their lives and the lives of their fellow miners. Keep this in mind as you proceed: be sure to let your trainees know that this program has been developed with their health and safety in mind. These training materials are as complete and self-contained as possible. Study the module before teaching the class so that you’ll be familiar with the material. Also, take time to review applicable regulations. Be flexible: take time to tailor the material to your team’s needs. Where a training exercise encompasses another mine rescue training requirement in Part 49, such as the requirement to wear an apparatus while in smoke, you may credit the team members under each requirement. Remember, the key to effective instruction is to be familiar and comfortable with the content. Overview The modules in this IG include: x Surface Organization x Mine Gases x Mine Ventilation x Exploration x Fires, Firefighting, and Explosions x Rescue of Survivors and Recovery of Bodies x Mine Recovery The modules are organized exactly the same way to help guide you logically through the lessons. Each module includes: x Training Objectives x Course Materials x Notes To Trainer x Instructional Text x Suggested Training Activities x Visuals and Handouts x Demonstration Checks x General Review Questions x Glossary NOTE TO TRAINER: Take time to thoroughly review objectives and materials in each section before you conduct training activities. Remember to always comply with the manufacturer’s recommendations use care, maintenance, and wearing of an SCBA. A Guide to Mine Rescue Training – Coal Surface Organization Module 1 Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents Course Objectives ............................................................................................. 1-1 Course Materials ............................................................................................... 1-1 Course Outline .................................................................................................. 1-2 Instructor Notes and Suggested Lecture ........................................................... 1-3 Visuals ............................................................................................................. 1-11 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 1-15 1- i Page Intentionally Left Blank Course Objectives The mine rescue team will be able to identify the components of an effective mine res- cue and recovery surface organization and the role the team plays in this structure. Team members will: x Become familiar with the mine’s emergency notification plan. x Understand the importance of establishing a chain-of-command and identify the team’s place in this chain. x Identify various facilities and arrangements normally recommended for carrying out a rescue and recovery operation. x Identify the various personnel and duties normally involved in surface organiza- tion. Course Materials Required: x Handouts and visuals from the back of this module x Pencil and paper for each team member Suggested: x Mine’s Notification Plan x Laptop computer x PowerPoint program x Chalkboard or flipchart NOTE TO TRAINER: In addition to these materials, you are encouraged to incorporate any other up-to-date supplemental mine rescue instructional materials, handouts, and/or methods that will increase the effectiveness and retention of the training. 1-1 Course Outline I. The Mine’s Emergency Notification Plan II. Surface Arrangements A. Suggested facilities and services 1. Command center 2. Waiting area for teams 3. Bench area for apparatus 4. Security 5. Information center 6. Waiting area for families and friends 7. Press room 8. Food and sleeping quarters 9. Laboratory 10. Medical facilities 11. Temporary morgue III. Establishing a Chain-of-Command IV. Other Essential Duties and Personnel 1. Mine superintendent 2. Mine foreman 3. Mine clerk 4. Chief electrician 5. Chief mechanic or mechanical foreman 6. Outside foreman a. Check person 7. Safety director 8. Chief engineer 9. Supply clerk 10. Other company personnel 1-2 Instructor Notes and Suggested Lecture The Mine’s Emergency Notification Plan Each mine must have an Emergency Notification Plan for notifying necessary personnel when there is an emergency at the mine. This plan lists the various supervisors, administrators, and government officials who must be notified in case of an emergency. Federal regulations require mines to have and post a Mine Rescue Notification Plan for notifying all the mine rescue team members that will be needed to assist in the rescue and recovery operation (30 CFR Section 49.19). The mine’s notification plan should also include any other people or services that will be needed at the mine site such as police officers, supply clerks, telephone operators, medical personnel, ambulances and other emergency vehicles. NOTE TO TRAINER: Show the team a copy of their mine’s notification plan, if there is one available. Or you can use the sample emergency notification plan (Visual 1). Surface arrangements Surface arrangements cover a wide range of activities and require the coordinated efforts of many people. They include such tasks as establishing a command center where all the decisions are made, providing an adequate information center from which all public information is released, and obtaining and distributing necessary supplies and equipment. Command Center The Command Center is the hub of rescue and recovery operations and is typically staffed and controlled by a mine emergency “command group.” This group is generally comprised of mine management personnel, federal and state officials, and union representatives. The Command Center receives a tremendous amount of information and will require secure communications equipment connected to underground phones and to other surface phones; this will enable the command group to communicate vital information during the rescue/recovery operations. All decisions concerning the mine rescue teams (scheduling, assignments, tracking, rotations, and methods of exploration or firefighting are made by the Command Center. The decision process of the command group is sometimes time-consuming, but it is important to understand the impact a single decision will have on the entire operation. A hasty or wrong decision could mean disaster and the loss of life. 1-3 Security Having good security at the mine is important in order to keep the roads open and to ensure that curious bystanders do not hinder the mine rescue effort and are not injured while on the mine property. All roads and paths leading to the mine should be secured and guarded by assigned company personnel or police officers. Incoming traffic on the roads leading to the mine property should also be regulated by authorized personnel to keep unnecessary vehicles off the roads so that they can remain open for needed personnel, supplies, and emergency vehicles. Waiting Area for Teams When the teams arrive at the mine site, they should be checked in and assigned to a team area. The mine rescue team coordinators should develop a “rotation schedule” for the deployment of all teams called to the mine site. NOTE TO TRAINER: The rotation schedule should be designed so there is a clear working order and backup teams always available. Time should be allotted for teams to rest and to clean, test, and prepare their apparatus and other equipment. Refer to Visual 2 at the back of this module
Recommended publications
  • Coal and Oil: the Dark Monarchs of Global Energy – Understanding Supply and Extraction Patterns and Their Importance for Futur
    nam et ipsa scientia potestas est List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2008) A decline rate study of Norwe- gian oil production. Energy Policy, 36(11):4262–4271 II Höök, M., Söderbergh, B., Jakobsson, K., Aleklett, K. (2009) The evolution of giant oil field production behaviour. Natural Resources Research, 18(1):39–56 III Höök, M., Hirsch, R., Aleklett, K. (2009) Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Pol- icy, 37(6):2262–2272 IV Jakobsson, K., Söderbergh, B., Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2009) How reasonable are oil production scenarios from public agen- cies? Energy Policy, 37(11):4809–4818 V Höök M, Söderbergh, B., Aleklett, K. (2009) Future Danish oil and gas export. Energy, 34(11):1826–1834 VI Aleklett K., Höök, M., Jakobsson, K., Lardelli, M., Snowden, S., Söderbergh, B. (2010) The Peak of the Oil Age - analyzing the world oil production Reference Scenario in World Energy Outlook 2008. Energy Policy, 38(3):1398–1414 VII Höök M, Tang, X., Pang, X., Aleklett K. (2010) Development journey and outlook for the Chinese giant oilfields. Petroleum Development and Exploration, 37(2):237–249 VIII Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2009) Historical trends in American coal production and a possible future outlook. International Journal of Coal Geology, 78(3):201–216 IX Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2010) Trends in U.S. recoverable coal supply estimates and future production outlooks. Natural Re- sources Research, 19(3):189–208 X Höök, M., Zittel, W., Schindler, J., Aleklett, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description
    Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Denison Mines Corp. May 2019 WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Project Summary English – Page ii French – Page x Dene – Page xx Cree – Page xxviii PAGE i WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Summary Wheeler River Project The Wheeler River Project (Wheeler or the Project) is a proposed uranium mine and processing plant in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. It is located in a relatively undisturbed area of the boreal forest about 4 km off of Highway 914 and approximately 35 km north-northeast of the Key Lake uranium operation. Wheeler is a joint venture project owned by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) and JCU (Canada) Exploration Company Ltd. (JCU). Denison owns 90% of Wheeler and is the operator, while JCU owns 10%. Denison is a uranium exploration and development company with interests focused in the Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan, Canada with a head office in Toronto, Ontario and technical office in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Historically Denison has had over 50 years of uranium mining experience in Saskatchewan, Elliot Lake, Ontario, and in the United States. Today, the company is part owner (22.5%) of the McClean Lake Joint Venture which includes the operating McClean Lake uranium mill in northern Saskatchewan. To advance the Project, Denison is applying an innovative approach to uranium mining in Canada called in situ recovery (ISR). The use of ISR mining at Wheeler means that there will be no need for a large open pit mining operation or multiple shafts to access underground mine workings; no workers will be underground as the ISR process is conducted from surface facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • ~ Coal Mining in Canada: a Historical and Comparative Overview
    ~ Coal Mining in Canada: A Historical and Comparative Overview Delphin A. Muise Robert G. McIntosh Transformation Series Collection Transformation "Transformation," an occasional paper series pub- La collection Transformation, publication en st~~rie du lished by the Collection and Research Branch of the Musee national des sciences et de la technologic parais- National Museum of Science and Technology, is intended sant irregulierement, a pour but de faire connaitre, le to make current research available as quickly and inex- plus vite possible et au moindre cout, les recherches en pensively as possible. The series presents original cours dans certains secteurs. Elle prend la forme de research on science and technology history and issues monographies ou de recueils de courtes etudes accep- in Canada through refereed monographs or collections tes par un comite d'experts et s'alignant sur le thenne cen- of shorter studies, consistent with the Corporate frame- tral de la Societe, v La transformation du CanadaLo . Elle work, "The Transformation of Canada," and curatorial presente les travaux de recherche originaux en histoire subject priorities in agricultural and forestry, communi- des sciences et de la technologic au Canada et, ques- cations and space, transportation, industry, physical tions connexes realises en fonction des priorites de la sciences and energy. Division de la conservation, dans les secteurs de: l'agri- The Transformation series provides access to research culture et des forets, des communications et de 1'cspace, undertaken by staff curators and researchers for develop- des transports, de 1'industrie, des sciences physiques ment of collections, exhibits and programs. Submissions et de 1'energie .
    [Show full text]
  • Mine Rescue Team Training: Metal and Nonmetal Mines (MSHA 3027, Formerly IG 6)
    Mine Rescue Team Training Metal and Nonmetal Mines U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration National Mine Health and Safety Academy MSHA 3027 (Formerly IG 6) Revised 2008 Visit the Mine Safety and Health Administration website at www.msha.gov CONTENTS Introduction Your Role as an Instructor Overview Module 1 – Surface Organization Module 2 – Mine Gases Module 3 – Mine Ventilation Module 4 – Exploration Module 5 – Fires, Firefighting, and Explosions Module 6 – Rescue of Survivors and Recovery of Bodies Module 7 – Mine Recovery Module 8 – Mine Rescue Training Activities Introduction Throughout history, miners have traveled underground secure in the knowledge that if disaster strikes and they become trapped in the mine, other miners will make every possible attempt to rescue them. This is the mine rescue tradition. Today’s mine rescue efforts are highly organized operations carried out by groups of trained and skilled individuals who work together as a team. Regulations require all underground mines to have fully-trained and equipped professional mine rescue teams available in the event of a mine emergency. MSHA’s Mine Rescue Instruction Guide (IG) series is intended to help your mine to meet mine rescue team training requirements under 30 CFR Part 49. The materials in this series are divided into self-contained units of study called “modules.” Each module covers a separate subject and includes suggestions, handouts, visuals, and text materials to assist you with training. Instructors and trainers may wish to use these materials to either supplement existing mine rescue training, or tailor a program to fit their mine-specific training needs.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE PAGE.Wpd
    Proceedings of BAT GATE DESIGN: A TECHNICAL INTERACTIVE FORUM Held at Red Lion Hotel Austin, Texas March 4-6, 2002 BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL Edited by: Kimery C. Vories Dianne Throgmorton Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum held March 4 -6, 2002 at the Red Lion Hotel, Austin, Texas Edited by: Kimery C. Vories Dianne Throgmorton Published by U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois and Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois Copyright 2002 by the Office of Surface Mining. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum (2002: Austin, Texas) Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: Red Lion Hotel, Austin, Texas, March 4-6, 2002/ edited by Kimery C. Vories, Dianne Throgmorton; sponsored by U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining and Fish and Wildlife Service, Bat Conservation International, the National Cave and Karst Management Symposium, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, the National Speleological Society, Texas Parks and Wildlife, the Lower Colorado River Authority, the Indiana Karst Conservancy, and Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-885189-05-2 1. Bat ConservationBUnited States Congresses. 2. Bat Gate Design BUnited States Congresses. 3. Cave Management BUnited State Congresses. 4. Strip miningBEnvironmental aspectsBUnited States Congresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Through-The-Earth Electromagnetic Trapped Miner Location Systems. a Review
    Open File Report: 127-85 THROUGH-THE-EARTH ELECTROMAGNETIC TRAPPED MINER LOCATION SYSTEMS. A REVIEW By Walter E. Pittman, Jr., Ronald H. Church, and J. T. McLendon Tuscaloosa Research Center, Tuscaloosa, Ala. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF MINES Research at the Tuscaloosa Research Center is carried out under a memorandum of agreement between the Bureau of Mines, U. S. Department of the Interior, and the University of Alabama. CONTENTS .Page List of abbreviations ............................................. 3 Abstract .......................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................... 4 Early efforts at through-the-earth communications ................. 5 Background studies of earth electrical phenomena .................. 8 ~ationalAcademy of Engineering recommendations ................... 10 Theoretical studies of through-the-earth transmissions ............ 11 Electromagnetic noise studies .................................... 13 Westinghouse - Bureau of Mines system ............................ 16 First phase development and testing ............................. 16 Second phase development and testing ............................ 17 Frequency-shift keying (FSK) beacon signaler .................... 19 Anomalous effects ................................................ 20 Field testing and hardware evolution .............................. 22 Research in communication techniques .............................. 24 In-mine communication systems ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on Fire Damp and Safety Lamps
    Downloaded from http://pygs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 26, 2021 610 weaker, the features grow fainter, and it is only rarely we see anything deserving the name of an escarpment at all. One of the most striking exceptions, occurring in the immediate neighbourhood of this town, is the escarpment of the "WooUey Edge Hock, which may be traced from New MiUer Dam as far south as the neighbourhood of Elsecar. Beyond this, the rock, which hereabouts is a coarse and massive gritstone about 100 feet thick, dies away altogether, and is replaced by shale. I have now given a sketch of the general geology of the district of which the Barnsley Coal­ field forms a part. On some future occasion I hope to be allowed to lay before you some details about the coal-field itself. SOME EEMARKS ON FIRE DAMP AND SAFETY LAMPS. BY JOHN HUTCHINSON, MANAGER OF THE GAS WORKS, BARNSLEY. The subject upon which I am about to offer a fevr remarks is one of deep interest to the Colliery Proprietors and the mining population generally of this neighbourhood. And I feel sure you will excuse me if I occupy a few minutes of your valuable time this afternoon in noticing some facts and observations recently made on this subject at the Oaks Colliery and elsewhere. Anything relating to this ill-fated Colliery is doubly in­ teresting at the present time, since within the last few days some of the bodies of the volunteers, who so nobly rushed into this fiery mine ten months ago, in order, if possible, to aid, succour, or rescue their fellow men from a dreadful and almost certain death, have at length, after overcoming many difficulties, been recovered, brought to the surface, identified, and interred, which is no small degree of satisfaction to their sorrowing relatives and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Report for 2011
    British Cave Rescue Council The representative body for voluntary underground rescue in the British Isles Incident Report for Period 1st January 2011 - 31st December 2011 (4) (5) Cave Rescue Organisation Rescue Cave Cornwall Rescue & Search Cumbria Mines Ore RU CRO Derbyshire CRO Devon CRG Gloucestershire Irish CRO Rescue Mendip Cave Midlands CRO CRO Wales North CRO Scottish SouthCRO East South & Mid CRT Wales Swaledale Mountain Rescue FRA Wharfedale Upper TOTALS Caving Incidents 11 - - 4 1 2 2 6 1 1 1 - 6 - 0 35 Assisting Authorities(3) - 2 - 5 - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - 9 Persons Assisted 23 - - 8 1 3 2 10 1 1 1 - 19 - 0 69 Fatalities 0 - - 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - 5 - 0 6 Persons Injured(1) 5 - - 4 1 0 - 4 1 1 1 - 1 - 0 18 Helicopter assistance (2) 2 - - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 2 Animal Incidents 6 1(5) - 2 0 - 1 0 0 3 0 - - - 0 13 Assistance to other teams 0 - - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 0 - - - 2 - Totals Underground Incidents 17 3 - 11 1 6 3 6 1 4 1 - 7 - 2 57 ‘Surface Incidents’ include fell/moorland rescues and searches. Teams, chiefly although not exclusively in the north, carry out these duties as part of their normal workload. These incidents are usually recorded in the Mountain Rescue (England & Wales) Incident Report for 2011. Surface Incidents 65 39 - - - - - - - - - - 2 25 36 167 Persons Assisted 90 6 - - - - - - - - - 5 25 26 152 Fatalities 2 1 - - - - - - - - - 4 2 5 14 Persons Injured 45 5 - - - - - - - - - 0 13 18 81 Surface Animal Incidents - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 Assistance to other teams - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 Totals Surface Incidents 65 39 - - - - - - - - - 2 25 36 128 Notes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Migration from Closed Coal Mines to the Surface. Risk Assessment Methodology and Prevention Means
    Post-Mining 2005, November 16-17, Nancy, France 1 GAS MIGRATION FROM CLOSED COAL MINES TO THE SURFACE. RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND PREVENTION MEANS Zbigniew POKRYSZKA1, Christian TAUZIÈDE1 and Candice LAGNY1, Yves GUISE2, Rémy GOBILLOT2, Jean-Maurice PLANCHENAULT2, René LAGARDE2 1 INERIS, Parc Technologique ALATA - BP N°2 - 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte – France; [email protected], [email protected]. 2 Charbonnages de France, 100 avenue Albert 1er - BP 220 - 92503 Rueil-Malmaison - France, [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT: French law as regards renunciation to mining concessions calls for the mining operator to first undertake analyses of the risks represented by their underground mining works. The problem of gas migration to the surface is especially significant in the context of coal mines. This is because mine gas can migrate to the earth's surface, then present significant risks: explosion, suffocation or gas poisoning risks. As part of the scheduled closure of all coal mining operations in France, INERIS has drawn up, at the request of national mining operator Charbonnages de France, a general methodology for assessing the risk linked to gas in the context of closed coal mines. This article presents the principles of this methodology. An application example based on a true case study is then described. This is completed by a presentation of the preventive and monitoring resources recommended and usually applied in order to manage the risk linked to gaseous emissions. KEYWORDS: gas, coal, mine, closure, risk. RESUME : La réglementation française en matière de renonciation aux concessions minières prévoit que l’exploitant minier réalise au préalable des analyses des risques présentés par ses travaux miniers souterrains.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane Recovery: a Primer
    Coal Mine Methane Recovery: A Primer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency July 2019 EPA-430-R-09-013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was originally prepared under Task Orders No. 13 and 18 of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Contract EP-W-05-067 by Advanced Resources, Arlington, USA and updated under Contract EP-BPA-18-0010. This report is a technical document meant for information dissemination and is a compilation and update of five reports previously written for the USEPA. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). USEPA does not: (a) make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe upon privately owned rights; (b) assume any liability with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report; or (c) imply endorsement of any technology supplier, product, or process mentioned in this report. ABSTRACT This Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Recovery Primer is an update of the 2009 CMM Primer, which reviewed the major methods of CMM recovery from gassy mines. [USEPA 1999b, 2000, 2001a,b,c] The intended audiences for this Primer are potential investors in CMM projects and project developers seeking an overview of the basic technical details of CMM drainage methods and projects. The report reviews the main pre-mining and post-mining CMM drainage methods with associated costs, water disposal options and in-mine and surface gas collection systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosibility of Coal Dust
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOKGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 425 THE EXPLOSIBILITY OF COAL DUST BY GEORGE S. RICE WITH CHAPTERS BX J. C. W. FRAZER, AXEL LARSEN, FRANK HAAS, AND CARL SCHOLZ WASHINGTON GOVERN M E N T P K I N T IN G OFFICE 1910 CONTENTS. Page. Introd uctory statement...................................... ............ 9 The coal-dust, problem................................................ 9 i Acknowledgments.................................................... 10 Historical review of the coal-dust question in Europe ....................... 11 Observations in England prior to 1850................................. 11 Observations by French engineers prior to 1890........................ 12 Experiments in England between 1850 and 1885........................ 12 Experiments in Prussia............................,.............:..... 14 Experiments in Austria between 1885 and 1891......................... 16 Views of English authorities between 1886 and 1908.................... 17 German, French, and Belgian stations for testing explosives............ 19 Altofts gallery, England, 1908......................................... 21 Second report of Royal Commission on Mines, 1909...................... 21 Recent Austrian experiments.......................................... 22 Historical review of the coal-dust question in the United States.............. 23 Grahamite explosions in West Virginia, 1871 and 1873.................. 23 Flour-mill explosion at Minneapolis, 1878.............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest Fatal Accident in Scottish Coal in the Nationalised Era. Scottish Labour History, 54, Pp
    Gibbs, E. and Phillips, J. (2019) Remembering Auchengeich: the largest fatal accident in Scottish coal in the nationalised era. Scottish Labour History, 54, pp. 47-57. This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/210374/ Deposited on: 19 February 2020 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Remembering Auchengeich: the largest fatal accident in Scottish coal in the nationalised era Ewan Gibbs and Jim Phillips The largest fatal accident in the post-Second World War Scottish coal industry took place on 18 September 1959, when 47 men were killed at Auchengeich Colliery in Moodiesburn, North Lanarkshire. On the sixtieth anniversary, we pay tribute to the Auchengeich miners, who died as a result of carbon monoxide poisoning arising from a large underground fire. This short note analyses the catastrophe within the longer history of underground dangers in the mining industry in Scotland. The nationalisation of coal mining in 1947 and stronger union voice in workplaces made mining much safer. Coal industry data summarised in this note shows that the rate of death underground roughly halved from the 1930s to the 1950s, but the calamitous losses at Auchengeich, nevertheless, demonstrated that mining remained a perilous occupation for the mass of workers engaged in underground work. Significant shortcomings in National Coal Board (NCB) management contributed directly to the loss of life at the colliery.
    [Show full text]