DOCSLIB.ORG

The Air Domain and the Challenges of Modern Air Warfare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Air Domain and the Challenges of Modern Air Warfare The Air Domain and the Challenges of Modern Air Warfare Harry Foster t is difficult to imagine a modern world with- • Allowed rapid insertion and resupply of Iout flight and its associated technologies. The forces at great distance from supporting speed possible in the air domain shrinks time: bases; and A modern airliner travels 25 times faster than the fastest cruise ship on the Atlantic and seven • Allowed air forces to go “over not times faster than the fastest locomotive in the through” the front lines of opposing 1950s. Militarily, operating in the air domain armies, disrupting rearward logistics, de- provides vantage: the ability to see not only over nying maneuver, and taking war directly the next hill, but also over the horizon. It pro- to capitals. vides maneuverability unencumbered by moun- tain ranges, roads, river crossings, or rocky Today, from a military perspective, the de- shoals at sea. Although navalists frequently re- gree to which the United States can exploit the mind us that 70 percent of the world is covered air domain in its favor to find and hold at risk by oceans, 100 percent of the world is covered by any target (fixed, mobile, hardened, and deep air. The air domain is physically linked to every inland) anywhere on the globe is a key differ- other domain, thus providing flexibility in op- entiator that makes it a military superpower. erations, while its range provides an avenue for Understanding the complexity of modern access anywhere in the world, anytime. air power begins with a basic understanding of Over the past century, exploitation of the the air domain itself. This means understand- air domain’s speed, vantage, maneuverability, ing the air domain’s unique attributes; how flexibility, and range changed the nature of one can access and use the domain while ex- warfare. Specifically, it: ploring the limits of height and speed for plat- forms that operate in it; the domain’s unique • Created new asymmetries that broke the attributes of speed, range, persistence, and stalemate of trench warfare after World payload that have allowed the United States to War I, enabling combined-arms maneuver dominate conflicts for the past 25 years; and warfare that is with us today; current key shifts in the domain, driven by the evolution of technology and the return of state- • Extended the reach of fleets and shore based competition, and their implications for defenses beyond the sight of observation future military requirements. towers or the range of naval surface fires, making control of the air a requisite for operations on the sea; The Heritage Foundation | heritage.org/Military 59 Attributes of the Air Domain per hour from the west at 35,000 feet over The Atmosphere: Home to the Air Do- the central United States in winter to as main. The Department of Defense defines the much as 200 miles per hour in the stron- air domain as “the atmosphere, beginning at gest jet streams. the Earth’s surface, extending to the altitude where its effects upon operations become neg- • Above the troposphere is the stratosphere, ligible.”1 At its most fundamental level, the at- which extends to about 180,000 feet. The mosphere is composed of air, a mixture of gases stratosphere is where the ozone layer is consisting of 21 percent oxygen, 78 percent located, and it is free from clouds and nitrogen, and 1 percent argon, carbon dioxide, weather. Wind diminishes significantly and other gases.2 with altitude in the stratosphere. Most of The composition of air is perhaps its most today’s military operations occur in the extraordinary and important characteristic troposphere and the stratosphere. because it determines the very nature of the domain and dictates what can and cannot be • Above the stratosphere at an altitude of done in it and drives the characteristics of the about 34 miles is a region of the atmo- platforms that fly through it. Because these sphere that has proven easy to transit gases have mass, the distribution of the at- but difficult to operate in persistently. In mosphere is not uniform. For example, due this region, there is enough air to cause to gravitational effects, nearly 50 percent of drag and surface heating but not enough atmospheric mass is contained below 18,000 to support aerodynamic control or air- feet at the equator, 90 percent is contained breathing engine combustion. below 52,000 feet, and 99.99 percent is con- tained below 330,000 feet or an altitude of 100 • Sitting above the stratosphere, extending kilometers.3 While some international organi- to 260,000 feet, is the mesosphere. Here, zations such as the Fédération Aéronautique meteors burn up due to atmospheric heat- Internationale define 100 kilometers as the ing. The ionosphere, which causes high- beginning of space, the United States does not frequency radio waves to bounce off the recognize a formal boundary either by treaty atmosphere enabling long-range amateur or by policy.4 radio operations, begins in this region. The atmosphere is divided into several lay- ers that are of varying degrees of significance • Above the mesosphere lies the final layer to military operations. of the atmosphere, the thermosphere, which extends to as much as 600 miles • The lowest level, the troposphere, varies above the Earth depending on solar activ- in height from the surface to 60,000 feet at ity. Atmospheric drag caused by gases in the equator to 30,000 feet over the poles. the lower portion of this layer limits the All weather occurs in the troposphere. lowest unpowered, stable satellite orbit to The top of the troposphere, called the roughly 120 miles. tropopause, is the “cap” where summer thunderstorms flatten out to form an anvil Accessing the Air Domain for Military shape. In the troposphere, the wind blows Advantage. From its earliest days, competi- west to east in the Northern Hemisphere tion in the air domain has been enabled by and east to west in the Southern Hemi- constantly advancing technology. Warfight- sphere. Temperature decreases by about ing in the air domain, however, is fundamen- 3.5 degrees Fahrenheit with every 1,000 tally a human endeavor, and as one learns feet of climb. Wind speed changes signifi- about airspace technologies, it is important to cantly with altitude, averaging 75 miles keep technology in perspective. Technology 60 2018 Index of U.S. Military Strength enables access to and exploitation of the air Heavier-than-air flight, on the other hand, domain, but humans marshal this technol- uses aerodynamic forces to produce and sus- ogy to gain advantage over others as a tool tain lift. Aerodynamic lift is produced by mov- of statecraft and war. Competition in the air ing an airfoil (wing) through volume of air or domain therefore centers on maintaining or fluid. Design differences between the upper denying this advantage and depends not only and lower surfaces of the airfoil force the air on mastery of technology, but also on its artful to move faster across the upper surface as the and creative organization and application in wing is propelled through the air. This creates strategy and tactics. an area of lower pressure on the top of the wing The characteristics of air and the atmo- that generates lift. There are other factors in- sphere make five modes of access to the volved, but if one produces enough aerody- air domain possible: lighter-than-air flight, namic lift to overcome the force of gravity, then heavier-than-air flight, missiles, ground-fired a heavier-than-air machine can fly.9 or sea-fired projectiles, and the electromag- There are two other forces at play in the cre- netic spectrum. ation of aerodynamic lift: the thrust required Lighter-than-air flight is achieved by trap- to propel a wing though the air to generate lift ping gases lighter than oxygen and nitrogen, and the drag that the wing creates through the like hydrogen or helium, or heated air in a process of creating lift. Thus, balancing the sealed casing. Because the gas inside the cas- problems of lift, gravity, thrust, and drag makes ing is lighter than the surrounding air, lift is flight possible using vehicles that are powered produced. The volume of air contained in that (airplanes, cruise missiles, helicopters, tilt ro- casing, coupled with the characteristics of the tors, and quad copters) and unpowered (towed gas inside, determines its lifting ability. This gliders, lifting bodies, and air-delivered guided allows exploitation of the air domain using hot- munitions). Aircraft provide a reusable form of air balloons, gas-filled balloons, or powered air- access to the air domain and offer an incredible ships (dirigibles and blimps). Lighter-than-air degree of flexibility with regard to speed, range, aircraft can provide persistence and relatively payload, and endurance for military operations. heavy lift, but this means of access is both slow Missiles use the brute force of expanding, and heavily affected by weather. burning gases provided by liquid-fueled or sol- Lighter-than-air flight was exploited in id-fueled rocket engines to overcome the effects World War I by Germany, which used dirigibles, of gravity and gain access to the air domain. As or powered airships, to bomb central London, the vehicle accelerates, it takes on aerodynamic and in World War II by the United States, characteristics and can be controlled using air- which used blimps for antisubmarine warfare craft-like control surfaces until it reaches mid- patrols.5 Although the speed of heavier-than- stratosphere. Above this altitude, small thrust- air platforms made them dominant over their ers or gimbaled engines controlled by guidance lighter-than-air brothers, a role remains for systems allow the highest levels of precision in balloons and powered airships today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual Second Edition April 2021
    UN Military Aviation Unit Manual United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual Second Edition April 2021 Second Edition 2019 DEPARTMENT OF PEACE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONAL SUPPORT UN Military Aviation Unit Manual Produced by: Office of Military Affairs, Department of Peace Operations UN Secretariat One UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017 Tel. 917-367-2487 Approved by: Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations Department of Peace Operations (DPO). Atul Khare Under-Secretary-General for Operational Support Department of Operational Support (DOS) April 2021. Contact: PDT/OMA/DPO Review date: 30/ 04 / 2026 Reference number: 2021.04 Printed at the UN, New York © UN 2021. This publication enjoys copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, governmental authorities or Member States may freely photocopy any part of this publication for exclusive use within their training institutes. However, no portion of this publication may be reproduced for sale or mass publication without the express consent, in writing, of the Office of Military Affairs, UN Department of Peace Operations. ii UN Military Aviation Unit Manual Foreword We are delighted to introduce the United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual, an essential guide for commanders and staff deployed in peacekeeping operations, and an important reference for Member States and the staff at United Nations Headquarters. For several decades, United Nations peacekeeping has evolved significantly in its complexity. The spectrum of multi-dimensional UN peacekeeping operations includes challenging tasks such as restoring state authority, protecting civilians and disarming, demobilizing and reintegrating ex-combatants. In today’s context, peacekeeping missions are deploying into environments where they can expect to confront asymmetric threats and contend with armed groups over large swaths of territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Collection
    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Use Handbook
    National Interagency Fire Center Military Use Handbook 2021 This publication was produced by the National Interagency Coordination Center (NICC), located at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), Boise, Idaho. This publication is also available on the Internet at http://www.nifc.gov/nicc/logistics/references.htm. MILITARY USE HANDBOOK 2021 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. ………………… ..................................................................................................................................................... CHAPTER 10 – GENERAL ........................................................................................................ 1 10.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................... 1 10.2 Overview .............................................................................................................. 1 10.3 Ordering Requirements and Procedures .............................................................. 1 10.4 Authorities/Responsibilities .................................................................................. 2 10.5 Billing Procedures ................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 20 – RESOURCE ORDERING PROCEDURES FOR MILITARY ASSETS ............... 4 20.1 Ordering Process ................................................................................................. 4 20.2 Demobilization
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Five Years Ahead of Its Time: the American Aerial Torpedo in World War I
    TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AHEAD OF ITS TIME: THE AMERICAN AERIAL TORPEDO IN WORLD WAR I Michael H. Taint, Lt. Colonel, USAF (Ret) Independent Scholar To the modern-day public, no weapon system is more evocative of American high technology than the “drone” or, more formally, the “Unmanned Aerial System” (UAS) or “Remotely Piloted Aircraft” (RPA). UASs in the last two decades have been deployed extensively through southwest Asia and appear almost daily in news reports. Few realize they were pioneered a century ago and nearly took their place alongside the tank, submarine, chemical weapons and fighter aircraft as an important technological breakthrough of World War I. This paper explores the development and testing of the first American drone. Developed in Dayton, Ohio, this “aerial torpedo” (also called an “automatic carrier” or “flying bomb”) was created by automotive innovator Charles F. “Boss” Kettering and nicknamed, in his honor, the “Kettering Bug.” Along with Kettering, important future actors in American military airpower such as General of the Air Force Henry “Hap” Arnold and James Doolittle of “Doolittle’s Raiders” were also involved in this secret development project, probably the first of its kind in Air Force history. Like most projects pushing the limits of the state of the art, the Kettering Bug was hampered by technical challenges; however, the project showed how breakthroughs can be achieved when a small group of accomplished technical experts are brought together on a complex task and allowed to seek creative solutions. Theirs was no small accomplishment. Looking back on the project, General “Hap” Arnold’s assessment was: The Bug was twenty five years ahead of its time.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft and International Law: Chicago Opus 3'
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 66 | Issue 3 Article 2 2001 Military Aircraft nda International Law: Chicago Opus 3 Michel Bourbonniere Louis Haeck Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Michel Bourbonniere et al., Military Aircraft na d International Law: Chicago Opus 3, 66 J. Air L. & Com. 885 (2001) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol66/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. MILITARY AIRCRAFT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: CHICAGO OPUS 3' MICHEL BOURBONNIERE Louis HAECK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CIVIL AND MILITARY INTERFACE ............... 886 II. TREATY OF PARIS ................................ 889 III. CHICAGO CONVENTION AND MILITARY AIRCRAFT ......................................... 893 A. ARTICLE 3(B) ................................... 896 B. ARTICLE 3(D) ................................... 912 1. Content of Due Regard ....................... 912 a. Exegetical Analysis ..................... 914 b. Analysis of the Annexes to the Chicago Convention ............................ 916 c. Analysis of the ICAO Resolutions ...... 922 2. Application of Due Regard ................... 926 a. How is Due Regard Applied? .......... 926 b. Where is Due Regard Applied? ........ 927 c. Methods of Application of Due Regard ................................. 928 IV. CAA-CANADA LITIGATION ....................... 931 A. CAA ARGUMENTS ............................... 932 B. DEFENSE BY CANADA ............................ 934 C. COMMENTS ON THE ARGUMENTS OF CAA ....... 935 D. COMMENTS ON THE CANADIAN ARGUMENTS ..... 941 V. UNAUTHORIZED OVERFLIGHT ................. 946 VI. U.S. DOMESTIC LAW ............................. 948 1 The authors express their appreciation to the following individuals for sharing their thoughts on the subject of this note: ICAO Legal Bureau, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion for Aspirant Air Warriors a Handbook for Personal Professional Study
    A Companion for Aspirant Air Warriors A Handbook for Personal Professional Study DAVID R. METS, PHD Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama May 2010 Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Cataloging Data Mets, David R. A companion for aspirant air warriors : a handbook for personal professional study / David R. Mets. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58566-206-7 1. Air power—History. 2. Aeronautics, Military—History. 3. Aeronautics, Military—Biography. 4. Military art and science—History. I. Title. 358.4—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the Air Force Research Institute, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 155 N. Twining Street Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 http://aupress.au.af.mil ii Dedicated to Maj Lilburn Stow, USAF, and his C-130 crew, who lost their lives over the A Shau Valley, Vietnam, 26 April 1968, while supporting their Army countrymen on the ground Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii FOREWORD . vii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xi INTRODUCTION . 1 1 THE INFANCY OF AIRPOWER. 3 2 NAVAL AVIATION . 7 3 AIRPOWER IN WORLD WAR I . 11 4 LAYING THE INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATIONS, 1919–1931 . 15 5 AN AGE OF INNOVATION, 1931–1941 . 19 6 NAVAL AVIATION BETWEEN THE WARS . 23 7 WORLD WAR II: THE RISE OF THE LUFTWAFFE . 29 8 WORLD WAR II: EUROPE—THE STRATEGIC BOMBING DIMENSION .
    [Show full text]
  • The Portugese Air Force Facing Challenges Head-On Mass Migration and Financial War Air Power's Second Century
    Ruivo © Jorge COMPLETE COMBAT SEARCH & RESCUE MULTI-ROLE FLEXIBILITY Edition 15, Spring / Summer 2012 Large cabin to meet demanding requirements and long range - over 900 nm demonstrated PAGE PAGE PAGE New technology, superior performance and high safety levels 6 45 55 Cost-effective through-life support and training based on operational experience agustawestland.com The Portugese Air Force Mass Migration Air Power’s Second Facing Challenges Head-On and Financial War Century: Interview with General José Pinheiro New Challenges Growing Dominance Chief of Sta , Portugese Air Force for Air Power? or Faded Glory? M-12-0055 NATO JAPCC AW101 journal advert.indd 1 10/02/2012 12:55:28 Joint Air & Space Power Conference ‘The Infl uence of Air Power upon History’ Walter Boyne is a retired U.S. Air Force Offi cer and Command pilot who has written 09th –11th 36 diff erent books on aviation. He was one of the fi rst directors of the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum and founded the bestselling aviation magazine Air&Space. October This book, from 2003, starts from the very beginning of the quest for the air, study- ing the development of Air Power philosophy and its evolution from theory to practice, through innovative thinkers’ infl uence and technological improvements that impacted not only military, but also commercial aviation, until the translation to Air and Space Power. In this pattern it off ers a comprehensive outlook of the use of Air Power to infl uence politics, not only from the military perspective, but also 2012 covering the commercial and humanitarian viewpoint. The analysis covers from the early times of balloons through the exploitation of space, through the two World Wars, the Cold War, Middle East confl icts etc., lead- ing to some interesting, controversial conclusions, departing from the generally By Walter J.Boyne accepted scenarios of Air Power.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctuary Lost: the Air War for ―Portuguese‖ Guinea, 1963-1974
    Sanctuary Lost: The Air War for ―Portuguese‖ Guinea, 1963-1974 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Martin Hurley, MA Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Professor John F. Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Alan Beyerchen Professor Ousman Kobo Copyright by Matthew Martin Hurley 2009 i Abstract From 1963 to 1974, Portugal and the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (Partido Africano da Independência da Guiné e Cabo Verde, or PAIGC) waged an increasingly intense war for the independence of ―Portuguese‖ Guinea, then a colony but today the Republic of Guinea-Bissau. For most of this conflict Portugal enjoyed virtually unchallenged air supremacy and increasingly based its strategy on this advantage. The Portuguese Air Force (Força Aérea Portuguesa, abbreviated FAP) consequently played a central role in the war for Guinea, at times threatening the PAIGC with military defeat. Portugal‘s reliance on air power compelled the insurgents to search for an effective counter-measure, and by 1973 they succeeded with their acquisition and employment of the Strela-2 shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile, altering the course of the war and the future of Portugal itself in the process. To date, however, no detailed study of this seminal episode in air power history has been conducted. In an international climate plagued by insurgency, terrorism, and the proliferation of sophisticated weapons, the hard lessons learned by Portugal offer enduring insight to historians and current air power practitioners alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aviation and the Environment: Historical Trends and Comparison to Civil Aviation
    MILITARY AVIATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT: HISTORICAL TRENDS AND COMPARISON TO CIVIL AVIATION Ian A. Waitz,* Stephen P. Lukachko,† and Joosung J. Lee‡ ABSTRACT NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard This paper articulates trends in the environmental im- NALF Naval Air Landing Field pact of military aviation between 1960 and 2000. The fo- NAS Naval Air Station cus is on community noise, local air quality, and global NCA Noise Control Act climate impacts and the discussion is restricted to fixed- NEPA National Environmental Policy Act wing aircraft. Comparisons are made to trends within the PL public law commercial air transport industry. The unique features of PM particulate matter military aircraft technology and operations responsible for SIP state implementation plan the differences in environmental impacts are described. UHC unburned hydrocarbon The discussion also considers the effects of environmental USC United States Code restrictions on the deployment and combat readiness of military aviation services. Regulations designed to mitigate 1 INTRODUCTION environmental impacts from military and civil aviation are In the United States, environmental concerns have also reviewed. increasingly focused on the impacts of aircraft operations. The analysis shows that military aviation has been This reflects a decrease in public willingness to accept responsible for a small and decreasing fraction of total environmental deterioration, improved identification of fossil fuel use in the United States. Further, when averaged aviation contributions (which generally increase with nationally, contributions to local air quality impacts and growth), and a better understanding of the ways health and community noise have decreased over the period consid- welfare might be affected. To effectively balance needs for ered.
    [Show full text]
  • We Wanted Wings: a History of the Aviation Cadet Program
    Cover illustration: “Aviation Cadets in Training – 1943” by Dottie Knight. (Courtesy, United States Air Force Art Collection) WE WANTED WINGS: A HISTORY OF THE AVIATION CADET PROGRAM Dr. Bruce A. Ashcroft Staff Historian HQ AETC/HO 2005 OFFICER CODE Duty well performed, Honor in all things, Country before self. AVIATION CADET HONOR CODE Article 1: An Aviation Cadet will not knowingly make any false statement, written or verbal, while acting in any capacity, official or otherwise, or in any situation reflecting on the Aviation Cadet Corps or the Air Force. Article 2: An Aviation Cadet will not take or receive the property of another person, or persons, under any conditions, without specific authority of that person or persons. Article 3: An Aviation Cadet will not impart or receive any unauthorized assistance, either outside or inside the classroom or places of instruction, which would tend to give any Aviation Cadet unfair advantage. Article 4: An Aviation Cadet will not quibble, use evasive statements, or technicalities in order to shield guilt or defeat the ends of justice. Article 5: An Aviation Cadet will report any violation of honor by another Aviation Cadet of which he is witness or has unquestionable knowledge. Article 6: An Aviation Cadet will not commit any act of intentional dishonesty which will reflect in any way on the honor and integrity of the Aviation Cadet Corps and the Air Force. Officer Code and Cadet Honor Code both from brochure, “Aviation Cadet Knowledge,” Preflight Training School, Lackland AFB TX, 1959. ii iii
    [Show full text]
  • Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation—
    2017PGS 4/13/98 10:26 PM Page 97 Crashed VE–7 on USS Langley, 1925. Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation— Naval Historical Center An Analysis USS Langley leading task group in the Philippines, 1944. Naval Historical Center Autumn/Winter 1997–98 / JFQ 97 2017PGS 4/13/98 10:26 PM Page 98 ■ CARRIER AVIATION By JAN M. VAN TOL interesting things at sea. While proponents of air- craft as independent strike weapons were a mi- he first part of this article, which ap- nority, aviators were already well accepted by the peared in the last issue of JFQ, charted commanding officers of ships. Flying was not re- the historical development of British garded as a bad tour, though it is noteworthy that and American carrier aviation, with most aviators continued to do traditional ship- T board tours. particular emphasis on the complex interplay of technological, operational, and organi- zational factors. The second part treats legislation requiring commanding officers of key questions on how this revolution succeeded in the U.S. Navy and was carriers to be aviators created career paths rather less successful in the Royal Navy and what that implies for military innovation. Risk was further reduced by establishing an Among questions considered are: institutional home for champions and a venue ■ How quickly did those who grasped the vision for experimenting with new capabilities and con- move from a vague to a clearly-defined vision? How cepts of operation. This led to a viable career path quickly did change take place? that kept officers employed when their few years ■ Which mattered more to making progress, indi- of flying ended.
    [Show full text]