Rumiantseva Kapitolina Alexeevna (1925 - 2002) Kapitolina Alexeevna Rumiantseva Was Born December 16, 1925 in the Leningrad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Rumiantseva Kapitolina Alexeevna (1925 - 2002) Kapitolina Alexeevna Rumiantseva was born December 16, 1925 in the Leningrad. In 1950 Kapitolina Rumiantseva graduated from Tavricheskaya Art School. She studied of G. Shakh, D. Rezanskaya, V. Petrova, M. Shuvaev. In 1950-1969 Kapitolina Rumiantseva taught drawing and painting in secondary art school. Since 1970 Kapitolina Rumiantseva has participated in Art Exhibitions. She painted still-lifes, landscapes, genre paintings. Kapitolina Rumiantseva was a member of the Leningrad Union of Artists since 1973. Kapitolina Alexeevna Rumiantseva died in Saint Petersburg in 2002. Paintings by Kapitolina Ruamiantseva are in Art museums and private collections in the Russia, France, Italy, in the U.S., and throughout the world. BIBLIOGRAPHY The Fall Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1970. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1972. Our Contemporary The Second Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1972. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1973. - p. 6. The Still-Life Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists. Exhibition catalogue. -Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1973. - p. 8. Our Contemporary regional exhibition of Leningrad artists of 1975. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1980. - p. 13. Exhibition of works by Leningrad women-artists of 1975. Exhibition catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1979. - p. 4. Regional Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1980. Exhibition catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1983. - p. 11. Directory of members of the Leningrad branch of Union of Artists of Russian Federation. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1987. - p. 113. The Leningrad Artists. Paintings of 1950-1980s. Exhibition catalogue. - Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Union of artists, 1994. - p. 5. A Painting from the life by Leningrad artists. Exhibition catalogue. - Saint Petersburg: Nikolai Nekrasov Memorial museum, 1994. - p. 5. The Lyrics in the works of artists of the war generation. Painting, drawings. Exhibition catalogue. - Saint Petersburg: Nikolai Nekrasov Memorial museum, 1995. - p. 5. Still-Life in painting of 1940-1990s. The Leningrad School. Exhibition catalogue. - Saint Petersburg: Nikolai Nekrasov Memorial museum, 1997. - p. 6. Link of Times: 1932 - 1997. Artists - Members of Saint - Petersburg Union of Artists of Russia. Exhibition catalogue. - Saint - Petersburg: Manezh Central Exhibition Hall, 1997. - p. 297. ____________________________________________________.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Collective Memory Reader
The Collective Memory Reader Edited by JEFFREY K. OLICK VERED VINITZKY-SEROUSSI DANIEL LEVY OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 20II OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further j / ^-i Oxford University's objective of excellence LOn ' 1 in research, scholarship, and education. H f y\ Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi 10 y New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece C G Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam j | Copyright © 20ii by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The collective memory reader / edited by Jeffrey K. Olick, Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi, and Daniel Levy, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-533741-9; ISBN 978-0-19-533742-6 (pbk.) 1. Collective memory. I. Olick, Jeffrey K., 1964- II. Vinitzky-Seroussi, Vered i960-. III. Levy, Daniel, 1962- HM1033.C62 2011 302.01—dc22 2010014503 98765432 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Introduction Jeffrey K. Olick, Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi, and Daniel Levy Memory, even conceived in its social dimensions, is hardly a new topic.
[Show full text]
Russian Plates Pp. 290-303
INDEX OF ARTISTS Dorfman, Elizaveta, 733 Ivanova, Vera, 868, 869 Litvak, M., 652 Index Dovgal’, Oleksandr, 783 Izenberg, Vladimir, 592–594, 643 Liubavina, Nadezhda, 74, 186, 364 Adlivankin, Samuil, 524, 525, 572, 573 Dubyns’kii, Hr., 858 (see also Author Index) Izoram, 1019 Liubimov, Aleksandr, 1197 Coordinated by Sarah Suzuki. (see also Author Index) Duplitskii, 1019 Liushin, 896 Contributors include Sienna Brown, Aivazovskii, 1021 Dvorakovskii, Valerian, 1080 K., B., 697, 698 Lopukhin, Aleksandr, 128 (see also Author Emily Capper, and Jennifer Roberts. Akishin, Leonid, 1019 K., F. P., 1151 Index) Aksel’rod, Meer (Mark), 789 Echeistov, Georgii, 284, 378–382, 455 K., N., 222 Lozowick, Louis, 706 Aleksandrova, Vera, 329 Efimov, B., 532 Kalashnikov, Mikhail, 263, 264 All numbers refer to the Checklist. Alekseev, Nikolai, 526, 574 Egorov, Vladimir, 583 Kalmykov, Mykola, 262 M., D., 608 Al’tman, Natan, 55, 56, 59, 117, 143, Elin, V. M., 1205 Kamenskii, Vasilii, 75, 76, 90, 94, 95, M., E., 751 144, 169, 215, 330, 331, 364, 447, Elkin, Vasilii, 793 142, 150, 164–66, 218 (see also Author Makarov, Mikhail, 1023 451, 527, 575, 636, 731, 1019, 1124, El’kina, D., 326 (see also Author Index) Index) Makletsov, Sergei, 206, 207 1162 (see also Author Index) Ender, Boris, 533, 584, 1228 Kandinsky, Vasily, 181, 223 (see also Malevich, Kazimir, 21, 37–40, 55, 56, Andreev, Aleksandr, 4 Epifanov, Gennadii, 1081 Author Index) 68, 69, 79–81, 91, 129, 236, Andreevskaia, M., 361 Epple, L., 1056 Kanevskii, A., 852 306–308, 348, 884, 1126–1128, 1153 Andronova,
[Show full text]
Following the Black Square: the Cosmic, the Nostalgic & the Transformative in Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uri
Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uribe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies: Russia, East Europe and Central Asia University of Washington 2017 Committee: Glennys Young James West José Alaniz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Jackson School of International Studies Cruz-Uribe ©Copyright 2017 Teofila Cruz-Uribe 1 Cruz-Uribe University of Washington Abstract Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uribe Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Jon Bridgman Endowed Professor Glennys Young History Department & Jackson School of International Studies Contemporary Russian art and museology is experiencing a revival of interest in the pioneering museology of the Russian artistic and political avant-garde of the early 20th century. This revival is exemplified in the work of contemporary Russian conceptual artist and self-styled ‘avant-garde museologist’ Arseniy Zhilyaev (b. 1984). Influential early 20th century Russian avant-garde artist and museologist Kazimir Malevich acts as the ‘tether’ binding the museologies of the past and present together, his famous “Black Square” a recurring visual and metaphoric indicator of the inspiration that contemporary Russian avant-garde museology and art is taking from its predecessors. This thesis analyzes Zhilyaev’s artistic and museological philosophy and work and determines how and where they are informed by Bolshevik-era avant-garde museology. This thesis also asks why such inspirations and influences are being felt and harnessed at this particular juncture in post-Soviet culture.
[Show full text]
Semionov Alexander Mikhailovich (1922 - 1984) Alexander Mikhailovich Semionov Was Born February 18, 1922 in the City of Torzhok, Tver Province, Soviet Russia
Semionov Alexander Mikhailovich (1922 - 1984) Alexander Mikhailovich Semionov was born February 18, 1922 in the city of Torzhok, Tver Province, Soviet Russia. In 1940, Alexander Semionov graduated from Tavricheskaya Art School in Leningrad. He studied of A. Gromov, S. Bootler, V.Oreshnikov , V. Levitsky, M. Aslamazian. Since 1954, Alexander Semionov has participated in Art Exhibitions. He painted cityscapes, landscapes, genre scenes, ancient Russian towns. Personal exhibition of Alexander Semionov was in Leningrad in 1987. Since 1957, Alexander Semionov was a member of the Leningrad Union of Artists. Alexander Mikhailovich Semionov died in Leningrad in 1984. Paintings by Alenander SEMIONOV are in Art museums and private collections in Russia, Japan, France, USA, England, and throughout the world. BIBLIOGRAPHY The Spring Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1955. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Leningrad Union of artists, 1956. - p. 16. The Fall Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1956. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Leningrad artist, 1958. - p. 22. 1917 - 1957. Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1958. - p. 29. All-Union Art Exhibition of 1957 dedicated to the 40th Anniversary of October Revolution. Catalogue. - Moscow: Soviet artist, 1957. - p. 71. The Fall Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1958. Catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1959. - p. 24. Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1960. Exhibition catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1960. - p. 16. Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1960. Exhibition catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1961. - p. 37. Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1961. Exhibition catalogue. - Leningrad: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1964. -p. 36. The Fall Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists of 1962.
[Show full text]
Download File
William Korey JACKSON-VANIK: ITS ORIGIN AND IMPACT Elizabeth Kridl Valkenier THE TOTALITARIAN MODEL AND ME Andrea Frodema MAKING SENSE OF A STRANGE NEW WORLD Tanya L. Domi ADVANCING WOMEN’S POLITICAL RIGHTS IN BOSNIA- HERZEGOVINA Jonathan Brooks Platt PROTEUS BOUND AND UNBOUND: THE 1937 PUSHKIN JUBILEE November 2002 Volume 14, Numbers 1-2 November 2002 The “Hamm an”Issue William Korey JACKSON-VANIK: ITS ORIGIN AND IMPACT AS RUSSIA NEARS “GRADUATION” / Elizabeth Kridl Valkenier THE TOTALITARIAN MODEL AND ME 16 Andrea Frodema MAKING SENSE OF A STRANGE NEW WORLD CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIAN EMIGRES ABOUT SEPTEMBER 11 23 Tanya L. Domi ADVANCING WOMEN’S POLITICAL RIGHTS IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 36 Jonathan Brooks Platt PROTEUS BOUND AND UNBOUND: THE 1937 PUSHKIN JUBILEE AND LITERATURE IN THE SOVIET SCHOOLS 47 Hole from the Editor While we arejustifiably proud of our international roster of contributors to the Harriman Review, we thought it appropriate on this occasion to showcase the work, ofHarriman Institute alumni and the work ofHarriman students. The authors in this issue represent the full span of the Russian and Harriman Institutes, from the opening essay by William Korey, a student in the inaugural class of the Russian Institute, to Andrea Frodema, who received her Masters degree last spring, and current graduate students Tanya L. Domi andJonathan Brooks Flatt. Wbile all these authors are new to the Harriman Review, we have also included an essay by long time Resident Scholar Elizabeth Kridl Valkenier, who will be familiar to readers from her essays on Russian art and his toy. —Ronald Meyer THE HARRIMAN REVIEW, successor to The Harriman Institute Forum, is published quarterly by the Harriman Institute, Columbia University.
[Show full text]
By Anton Yasnitsky a Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements
VYGOTSKY CIRCLE DURING THE DECADE OF 1931-1941: TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE SCIENCE OF MIND, BRAIN, AND EDUCATION by Anton Yasnitsky A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Anton Yasnitsky, 2009 VYGOTSKY CIRCLE DURING THE DECADE OF 1931-1941: TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE SCIENCE OF MIND, BRAIN, AND EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy 2009 Anton Yasnitsky Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning University of Toronto ABSTRACT This dissertation presents a study of the scientific practices of the circle of Vygotsky’s closest collaborators and students during the decade of the 1930s-and including the early 1940s (until Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union and the beginning of the Great Patriotic War in 1941). The notion of Vygotsky Circle is introduced in this work and is explicitly distinguished from a traditional—yet frequently criticised—notion of “the school of Vygotsky-Leontiev-Luria”. The scientific practices of the Vygotsky Circle are discussed here as the unity of a) social and interpersonal relations, b) the practices of empirical scientific research, and c) discursive practices of the Soviet science—more specifically, the “Stalinist Science” of the 1930s. Thus, this study analyzes the social and interpersonal relations between the members of the Vygotsky Circle and the evolution of this circle in the social context of Soviet science during the decade of 1930s; various practices of empirical scientific research conducted by the members of the Vygotsky Circle were also overviewed. Finally, discursive practices of the Soviet scientific “doublespeak” were discussed and illustrated with several examples borrowed from publications of the time.
[Show full text]
Terror and Transcendence in the Void: Viktor Pelevin's Philosophy Of
Terror and Transcendence in the Void: Viktor Pelevin’s Philosophy of Emptiness By © 2017 Rebecca Stakun M.A., University of Kansas, 2011 B.A., George Washington University, 2006 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Slavic Languages and Literatures and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chair: Vitaly Chernetsky ________________________________ Co-Chair: Maria Carlson ________________________________ Marc Greenberg ________________________________ Ani Kokobobo ________________________________ Bruce Hayes Date Defended: 4 August 2017 The Dissertation Committee for Rebecca Stakun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Terror and Transcendence in the Void: Viktor Pelevin’s Philosophy of Emptiness ________________________________ Chair: Vitaly Chernetsky Date Accepted: 4 August 2017 ii Abstract This dissertation explores the Russian experience of the “void” left in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union as it is reflected in Viktor Pelevin’s Chapaev and Pustota (1996), Generation “P” (1999), The Sacred Book of the Werewolf (2004), and Empire “V” (2006). If, as postmodernist theory suggests, there can be no overarching cultural (or other) narratives, then in the aftermath of the Soviet Union’s collapse post-Soviet Russia found itself in a void, with no old, established national narrative and no new “Russian idea” to shape future identity. At the very moment when post-Soviet
[Show full text]
The Myth of Stalingrad in Soviet Literature, 1942-1963
The Myth of Stalingrad in Soviet Literature, 1942-1963 by Ian Roland Garner A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures University of Toronto © Copyright by Ian Roland Garner 2018 The Myth of Stalingrad in Soviet Literature, 1942-1963 Ian Roland Garner Doctor of Philosophy Department of Slavic Languages & Literatures University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This study explores representations of the Battle of Stalingrad in Soviet literature between 1942 and 1963, asking how Stalingrad became central to Russian identity in this period. The work reads Stalingrad’s cultural significance within a body of scholarship on Soviet subjectivity and memory of the Second World War. My analysis begins with a survey of frontline newspaper stories, including material by Konstantin Simonov and previously unstudied stories by Vasily Grossman, which characterized the battle in eschatological terms. I then explore efforts to encode Stalingrad in epic form immediately following the battle and further chart how the story became a vehicle for Stalin’s deification in the late 1940s by comparing Il’ia Ehrenburg’s novel The Storm and minor works. I then show how Grossman’s For a Just Cause links wartime and Stalinist motifs. Finally, I uncover how Simonov and Grossman rewrote Stalingrad during the Khrushchev period. Simonov’s Not Born Soldiers suggested Stalingrad was a resurrection that could be repeated in the present; Grossman’s Life and Fate disrupted the epic wholeness of the Stalingrad myth with polyphony. Drawing on Frank Kermode’s work on myth, I read representations of Stalingrad as being imbued with kairotic significance for a Russian nation attached to an historicist view of the world.
[Show full text]
Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia
Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia This book examines the societal dynamics of memory politics in Russia. Since Vladimir Putin became president, the Russian central government has increas- ingly actively employed cultural memory to claim political legitimacy and dis- credit all forms of political opposition. The rhetorical use of the past has become adefining characteristic of Russian politics, creating a historical foundation for the regime’s emphasis on a strong state and centralised leadership. Exploring memory politics, this book analyses a wide range of actors, from the central government and the Russian Orthodox Church to filmmaker and cultural heavyweight Nikita Mikhalkov and radical thinkers such as Alek- sandr Dugin. In addition, in view of the steady decline in media freedom since 2000, it critically examines the role of cinema and television in shaping and spreading these narratives. Thus, this book aims to promote a better understanding of the various means through which the Russian government practices its memory politics (e.g. the role of state media) while at the same time pointing to the existence of alternative and critical voices and criticism that existing studies tend to overlook. Contributing to current debates in the field of memory studies and of cur- rent affairs in Russia and Eastern Europe, this book will be of interest to scholars working in the fields of Russian studies, cultural memory studies, nationalism and national identity, political communication, film, television and media studies. Mariëlle Wijermars is a postdoctoral researcher at the Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Studies in Contemporary Russia Series Editor: Markku Kivinen Studies in Contemporary Russia is a series of cutting-edge, contemporary studies.
[Show full text]
Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives
Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives EDITED BY LOUISE HARDIMAN AND NICOLA KOZICHAROW To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives Edited by Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2017 Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow. Copyright of each chapter is maintained by the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow, Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art: New Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0115 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
[Show full text]
Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia
Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia This book examines the societal dynamics of memory politics in Russia. Since Vladimir Putin became president, the Russian central government has increas- ingly actively employed cultural memory to claim political legitimacy and dis- credit all forms of political opposition. The rhetorical use of the past has become adefining characteristic of Russian politics, creating a historical foundation for the regime’s emphasis on a strong state and centralised leadership. Exploring memory politics, this book analyses a wide range of actors, from the central government and the Russian Orthodox Church to filmmaker and cultural heavyweight Nikita Mikhalkov and radical thinkers such as Alek- sandr Dugin. In addition, in view of the steady decline in media freedom since 2000, it critically examines the role of cinema and television in shaping and spreading these narratives. Thus, this book aims to promote a better understanding of the various means through which the Russian government practices its memory politics (e.g. the role of state media) while at the same time pointing to the existence of alternative and critical voices and criticism that existing studies tend to overlook. Contributing to current debates in the field of memory studies and of cur- rent affairs in Russia and Eastern Europe, this book will be of interest to scholars working in the fields of Russian studies, cultural memory studies, nationalism and national identity, political communication, film, television and media studies. Mariëlle Wijermars is a postdoctoral researcher at the Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Studies in Contemporary Russia Series Editor: Markku Kivinen Studies in Contemporary Russia is a series of cutting-edge, contemporary studies.
[Show full text]
Cinema and the Nationality Question in Soviet Ukraine During the Long 1960S
SCENES OF BELONGING: CINEMA AND THE NATIONALITY QUESTION IN SOVIET UKRAINE DURING THE LONG 1960S by Joshua J. First A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor William G. Rosenberg, Chair Professor Ronald G. Suny Associate Professor Scott Spector Associate Professor Johannes von Moltke © Joshua J. First 2008 Preface While conducting research for this dissertation, I ran across an odd article from 1996 in a short-lived Ukrainian newspaper called Film Currier (Kinokur”er), which excitedly reported on the front page that Planet 3963, discovered by astronomer Liudmila Chernykh from the Crimean Astrophysics Observatory in 1969, had been renamed in honor of the recently deceased Soviet filmmaker Sergei Paradzhanov. The editors thanked Tat’iana Derevianko at the Oleksandr Dovzhenko Museum for her efforts at achieving recognition for the change with international organizations, writing that it was important that the “universe have as many of ‘our’ planets as possible.” While affirming the national significance of the re-naming, which fit with the larger project of re-imagining Ukrainian history and its canon of heroes and villains – Turgenev Street in L’viv, for example, became Heroes of the UPA Street – the editors nonetheless kept “our” in quotes, suggesting either an ironic detachment from the possessive pronoun, or an inability to commit to such stellar possessions when the newly independent republic did not even have firm possession over its own coastline. Perhaps they felt the Museum was overstating Paradzhanov’s importance, but just as likely the editors were ambivalent about associating the filmmaker’s name with Ukraine in particular.
[Show full text]