DOCSLIB.ORG

Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia This book examines the societal dynamics of memory politics in Russia. Since Vladimir Putin became president, the Russian central government has increas- ingly actively employed cultural memory to claim political legitimacy and dis- credit all forms of political opposition. The rhetorical use of the past has become adefining characteristic of Russian politics, creating a historical foundation for the regime’s emphasis on a strong state and centralised leadership. Exploring memory politics, this book analyses a wide range of actors, from the central government and the Russian Orthodox Church to filmmaker and cultural heavyweight Nikita Mikhalkov and radical thinkers such as Alek- sandr Dugin. In addition, in view of the steady decline in media freedom since 2000, it critically examines the role of cinema and television in shaping and spreading these narratives. Thus, this book aims to promote a better understanding of the various means through which the Russian government practices its memory politics (e.g. the role of state media) while at the same time pointing to the existence of alternative and critical voices and criticism that existing studies tend to overlook. Contributing to current debates in the field of memory studies and of cur- rent affairs in Russia and Eastern Europe, this book will be of interest to scholars working in the fields of Russian studies, cultural memory studies, nationalism and national identity, political communication, film, television and media studies. Mariëlle Wijermars is a postdoctoral researcher at the Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Studies in Contemporary Russia Series Editor: Markku Kivinen Studies in Contemporary Russia is a series of cutting-edge, contemporary studies. These monographs, joint publications and edited volumes branch out into various disciplines, innovatively combining research methods and theories to approach the core questions of Russian modernisation; how do the dynamics of resources and rules affect the Russian economy and what are the prospects and needs of diversification? What is the impact of the changing state-society relationship? How does the emerging welfare regime work? What is the role of Russia in contemporary international relations? How should we understand the present Russian political system? What is the philosophical background of modernisation as a whole and its Russian version in particular? The variety of opinions on these issues is vast. Some see increasingly less difference between contemporary Russia and the Soviet Union while, at the other extreme, prominent experts regard Russia as a ‘more or less’ normal European state. At the same time new variants of modernisation are espoused as a result of Russian membership of the global BRIC powers. Combining aspects of Western and Soviet modernisation with some anti-modern or tradi- tional tendencies the Russian case is ideal for probing deeper into the evolving nature of modernisation. Which of the available courses Russia will follow remains an open question, but these trajectories provide the alternatives avail- able for discussion in this ground-breaking and authoritative series. The editor and the editorial board of the series represent the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Russian Studies: Choices of Russian Modernisation. For more information about this series, please visit: www.routledge.com/ series/ASHSER-1421 Russia and the EU Spaces of Interaction Edited by Thomas Hoffmann and Andrey Makarychev Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia Television, Cinema and the State Mariëlle Wijermars Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia Television, cinema and the state Mariëlle Wijermars First published 2019 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2019 Mariëlle Wijermars The right of Mariëlle Wijermars to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record has been requested for this book ISBN: 9781138543195 (hbk) ISBN: 9781351007207 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Taylor & Francis Books Contents Acknowledgements vii 1 Introduction 1 Memory politics beyond the Kremlin walls 2 Governmental memory politics in post-Soviet Russia 5 History on the small and big screens 9 Methodology 13 2 Memory politics and the remediation of cultural memory 19 Cultural memory and political legitimacy 19 The politics of memory: conformity and contestation 21 Memory politics on screen 23 Remediation 30 Case studies 39 3 Petr Stolypin: The making of a cultural memory 41 Stolypin in the Russian historical and political imagination 41 Institutionalisation of Stolypin’s memory 44 Film and television analyses 51 Petr Stolypin … The Undrawn Lessons (2006) 52 The Name is Russia (2008): Petr Stolypin 65 Petr Stolypin: A Shot at Russia (2012) 72 Conclusion 79 4 Aleksandr Nevskii: The saviour of Orthodox civilisation 84 Nevskii in the Russian historical and political imagination 84 A beacon of Orthodox morality in the face of globalisation 88 The Russian Orthodox Church and cultural memory 91 Nevskii as the founding father of Russian foreign policy 97 vi Contents Film and television analyses 100 Aleksandr: The Neva Battle (2008) 100 The Name is Russia (2008) 107 Conclusion 118 5 The Time of Troubles: The cyclical return of chaos 122 The Time of Troubles in the Russian political and cultural imagination 124 Institutionalisation of the memory: the Day of National Unity 129 Memory chains 136 Film and television analyses 140 TV documentaries on the occasion of the Day of National Unity (2005–2006) 140 1612: Chronicles of the Time of Troubles (2007) 148 Boris Godunov (2011) 153 Conclusion 159 6 Ivan the Terrible and the Oprichnina: Subversive histories 164 Ivan the Terrible in the Russian historical and political imagination 165 The concept of ‘Novaia Oprichnina’ 171 Ivan the Terrible and Orthodox fundamentalism 179 Film and television analyses 183 Ivan the Terrible (2009) 184 Tsar (2009) 192 The Trial of Time (2010) 199 Conclusion 204 7 The Trial of Time 207 The trial of The Trial of Time 209 Cancellation and reappearance 212 8 Conclusion 217 List of interviews 227 References 229 Index 249 Acknowledgements There are many people who, in various ways, helped me complete this study and to whom I owe my heartfelt gratitude. First of all, to Sander Brouwer, whose contribution to the project from initial idea to completion has been invaluable. Thank you, Sander, for your friendship and your unfailing trust in my potential. I also wish to express my heartfelt gratitude to Joost van Baak for his sincere enthusiasm for the project and encouraging nudges along the way. Finally, a thank you is in order to Boris Noordenbos for his feedback on the initial project idea. The research for this book was conducted at the Uni- versity of Groningen, where the first version of the book was completed in the summer of 2016. I am grateful to the Aleksanteri Institute of the University of Helsinki for the institutional support I have received while preparing the manuscript for publication. With regard to my research stay in Moscow, I wish to thank Galina Zver- eva for hosting me at the Russian State University for the Humanities and for offering me advice. I owe gratitude to Andrei Shemiakin, Il’ia Kukulin and Ekaterina Lapina-Kratasiuk who consulted with me during my stay. I also wish to thank Marina Frolova-Walker for offering me a home-away-from-home in Moscow as well as first-class companionship. A special thank you goes to Natal’ia Iakovlevna Venzher for sharing her extensive knowledge of Russian cinema and television production and state financing, for allowing me to make use of her personal database of television broadcasts and, above all, for her heartfelt hospitality. To the members of the Foreign Historians Club (you know who you are) who provided me with company during the long winter months. Finally, I wish to thank my interviewees as well as the other people I met during my stay in Moscow for their kindness, generosity and trust. Despite increasing socio-political tensions and evident pressure on those working in cinema and television at the time when I did my fieldwork in autumn and winter 2014, they welcomed me with incredible openness and generosity. Earlier versions of several chapters were presented at conferences and workshops in Belgium, Denmark, Japan, the Netherlands, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States; I wish to thank the audiences and dis- cussants for their valuable remarks and encouragements. A personal thank you is in order to Otto Boele, Graeme Gill and Yngvar Steinholt for reading viii Acknowledgements and commenting on parts of the manuscript. To Hanna Stähle, for com- menting on parts of the manuscript and advising me on translation mat- ters. And to Kseniia Rovinskaia for helping me wrestle with untranslatable Russian slang. Finally, a very special thank you goes out to Niké Wentholt, the best office mate in the world, who generously offered me the key to her vacant home for the final stretch of the research for this book. And, of course, to Richard, for keeping me sane along the way and for always pushing me to dream bigger. Part of my research was facilitated by a European Union Erasmus Mundus Action 2: Aurora mobility grant, which allowed me to spend six months as a visiting doctoral researcher at the Russian State University for the Huma- nities in Moscow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guidebook to Historic City Centre
    a guidebookPskov to historic city centre This publication has been produced with the financial support of Latvia-Russia Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020. Its contents are the sole responsibility of Pskov City Administration and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Programme, Programme participating countries Latvia and Russia, alongside with the European Union. 1 A specialof russian city history The ancient city of Pskov, located at the confluence of the Pskova and the Velikaya 16 Rivers, was first mentioned in the “Tale of Bygone Years” under the year 903. But its PSKOV history goes much further and IS MOTHER LAND dates back about 2000 years OF PRINCESS OLGA, according to archaeological the first Christian ruler data. of Rus and its first saint. Olga, during whose reign a fortified settlement turned into a town, is considered the founder and the patron saint of Pskov. Once, standing on the left bank of the Velikaya River, princess Olga saw the three rays of light 43 crossed at one spot on a high cliff covered with a forest and prophesied a big and glorious town to be founded there. A smithed cross and Olginskaya chapel at the place from where princess Olga saw the heavenly sign according to the legend. 2 The seal of Pskov Hospodariat Being initially the tribal centre of “krivichi” in the 10th – THE VECHE (ASSEMBLY) beginning of the 12th centuries, SQUARE Pskov was a part of Old Russian is the centre of political life state and then of Novgorod of Pskov of the 13th – 14th land. In 1348 it became the centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Elections in Russia: the Opposition’S Chance Key Findings of the Report
    Municipal elections in Russia: the opposition’s chance Key findings of the report April 2020 1 Students of Russian politics rightly focus on the “vertical of power” that Vladimir Putin has created since he first became President of Russia two decades ago. Taking the top office in a country moving tentatively toward democracy, Putin’s “vertical” or “managed democracy” set the country back toward its authoritarian traditions. Without doubt, Vladimir Putin has control of the major sources of hard and soft power in a Russia. And many analysts believe this system has staying power, even after Putin leaves the stage. Yet the authoritarian features of the Putin system are not all encompassing. While he and his team may control the major issues on the agenda, they do not dominate all politics. This is particularly evident at the municipal level, where, despite all the advantages enjoyed by Putin and his United Russia party, competitive elections take place and real opposition party candidates can win. In this paper, produced by the Dossier Center, a project developed and supported by Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the authors provide interesting data from recent local elections. These data provide some indications of how Russian politics may evolve. For instance, the authors point out that with greater mobilization efforts, opposition candidates could defeat and replace as many as 3000 United Russia representatives. Historically, one interesting thing about authoritarian and totalitarian systems, is that they seem irresistible, until suddenly they are not. Recognizing this, we should be attuned to developments in Russian outside the big politics of the Kremlin. Municipal elections are a natural place to begin.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Many Foreign Policies
    Russia’s Many Foreign Policies MICHAEL MCFAUL hat are Russian foreign policy objectives? It depends on whom you ask. W In making assessments of Russia’s behavior in the world, it is absolutely critical that we recognize that Russia today is not a totalitarian state ruled by a Communist Party with a single and clearly articulated foreign policy of expand- ing world socialism and destroying world capitalism and democracy. That state disappeared in 1991. Rather, Russia is a democratizing state—a weakly institu- tionalized democracy with several deficiencies, but a democratizing state nonetheless. Russia’s foreign policy, in turn, is a product of domestic politics in a pluralistic system. In democracies, “states” do not have foreign policy objectives. Rather, indi- vidual political leaders, parties, and interest groups have foreign policy objec- tives. Under certain conditions, these various forces come together to support a united purpose in foreign affairs. At other times, these disparate groups can have conflicting views about foreign policy objectives. They can even support the same foreign policy objective for different reasons.1 Russia today is no different. Although Russian leaders share in supporting a few common, general foreign policy objectives, they disagree on many others. They also disagree on the means that should be deployed to achieve the same for- eign policy objective. The foreign policy that eventually results is a product of debate, political struggle, electoral politics, and lobbying by key interest groups. Because Russia is undergoing revolutionary change internally, the foreign policy that results from Russian domestic politics can change quickly. This article makes the case for the centrality of domestic politics in the artic- ulation and implementation of Russian foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation
    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2, 2016 October 2, 2016 15TH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST 15TH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST ST
    October 2, 2016 October 2, 2016 15TH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST 15TH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST ST. PHILIP Anna, princess of Kashin ORTHODOX COMMEMORATIONS: The Holy Right-believing Princess Anna of ST. DAMARIS OF ATHENS (1ST C.) Kashin, a daughter of Rostov Prince Demetrius CHURCH HIEROMARTYR CYPRIAN THE CONFESSOR & Borisovich, became the wife of the holy Great VIRGIN-MARTYR JUSTINA (304) 1970 Clearview Road Prince Michael Yaroslavich of Tver in 1294. After ST. LEGER, BISHOP OF AUTUN (677) Souderton, PA 18964 the death of her husband by Mongol Tartars, Anna THEOPHILOS THE CONFESSOR (BULGARIA, 716) www.st-philip.net (215) 721-4947 withdrew into Tver’s Sophia monastery and DAVID AND CONSTANTINE, PRINCE-MARTYRS OF accepted tonsure with the name Euphrosyne. She Emails: [email protected] GEORGIA (740) later transferred to the Kashin Dormition [email protected] [email protected] ANDREW OF CONSTANTINOPLE, FOOL-FOR-CHRIST Monastery, and became a schema-nun with the (911) name Anna. She fell asleep in the Lord on [email protected] [email protected] ANNA, PRINCESS OF KASHIN (1338) October 2, 1338. NEW-MARTYR GEORGE AT KARATZASOU (1794) Miracles at St. Anna’s grave began in 1611 during the siege of Kashin by V. Rev. Father Noah Bushelli, Pastor Polish and Lithuanian forces. There was also a great fire in the city which 215-721-1193 died down without doing much damage. The saint, dressed in her Rev. Father James Thayer Tone 6 215-692-0890 monastic schema, appeared to Gerasimus, a gravely ill warden of the Eothinon 4 Deacon Herman R. Acker Dormition Cathedral.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunel's Dream
    Global Foresights | Global Trends and Hitachi’s Involvement Brunel’s Dream Kenji Kato Industrial Policy Division, Achieving Comfortable Mobility Government and External Relations Group, Hitachi, Ltd. The design of Paddington Station’s glass roof was infl u- Renowned Engineer Isambard enced by the Crystal Palace building erected as the venue for Kingdom Brunel London’s fi rst Great Exhibition held in 1851. Brunel was also involved in the planning for Crystal Palace, serving on the The resigned sigh that passed my lips on arriving at Heathrow building committee of the Great Exhibition, and acclaimed Airport was prompted by the long queues at immigration. the resulting structure of glass and iron. Being the gateway to London, a city known as a melting pot Rather than pursuing effi ciency in isolation, Brunel’s of races, the arrivals processing area was jammed with travel- approach to constructing the Great Western Railway was to ers from all corners of the world; from Europe of course, but make the railway lines as fl at as possible so that passengers also from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North and South could enjoy a pleasant journey while taking in Britain’s won- America. What is normally a one-hour wait can stretch to derful rural scenery. He employed a variety of techniques to two or more hours if you are unfortunate enough to catch a overcome the constraints of the terrain, constructing bridges, busy time of overlapping fl ight arrivals. While this only adds cuttings, and tunnels to achieve this purpose. to the weariness of a long journey, the prospect of comfort Rain, Steam and Speed – The Great Western Railway, a famous awaits you on the other side.
    [Show full text]
  • This Content Downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec
    This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LETTERS FROM HEAVEN: POPULAR RELIGION IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions This page intentionally left blank This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Edited by JOHN­PAUL HIMKA and ANDRIY ZAYARNYUK Letters from Heaven Popular Religion in Russia and Ukraine UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions www.utppublishing.com © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2006 Toronto Buffalo London Printed in Canada ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 Printed on acid­free paper Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Letters from heaven : popular religion in Russia and Ukraine / edited by John•Paul Himka and Andriy Zayarnyuk. ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 1. Russia – Religion – History. 2. Ukraine – Religion – History. 3. Religion and culture – Russia (Federation) – History. 4. Religion and culture – Ukraine – History. 5. Eastern Orthodox Church – Russia (Federation) – History. 6. Eastern Orthodox Church – Ukraine – History. I. Himka, John•Paul, 1949– II. Zayarnyuk, Andriy, 1975– BX485.L48 2006 281.9 947 C2006­903711­6 University of Toronto Press acknowledges the financial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Olena Semenyaka, the “First Lady” of Ukrainian Nationalism
    Olena Semenyaka, The “First Lady” of Ukrainian Nationalism Adrien Nonjon Illiberalism Studies Program Working Papers, September 2020 For years, Ukrainian nationalist movements such as Svoboda or Pravyi Sektor were promoting an introverted, state-centered nationalism inherited from the early 1930s’ Ukrainian Nationalist Organization (Orhanizatsiia Ukrayins'kykh Natsionalistiv) and largely dominated by Western Ukrainian and Galician nationalist worldviews. The EuroMaidan revolution, Crimea’s annexation by Russia, and the war in Donbas changed the paradigm of Ukrainian nationalism, giving birth to the Azov movement. The Azov National Corps (Natsional’nyj korpus), led by Andriy Biletsky, was created on October 16, 2014, on the basis of the Azov regiment, now integrated into the Ukrainian National Guard. The Azov National Corps is now a nationalist party claiming around 10,000 members and deployed in Ukrainian society through various initiatives, such as patriotic training camps for children (Azovets) and militia groups (Natsional’ny druzhiny). Azov can be described as a neo- nationalism, in tune with current European far-right transformations: it refuses to be locked into old- fashioned myths obsessed with a colonial relationship to Russia, and it sees itself as outward-looking in that its intellectual framework goes beyond Ukraine’s territory, deliberately engaging pan- European strategies. Olena Semenyaka (b. 1987) is the female figurehead of the Azov movement: she has been the international secretary of the National Corps since 2018 (and de facto leader since the party’s very foundation in 2016) while leading the publishing house and metapolitical club Plomin (Flame). Gaining in visibility as the Azov regiment transformed into a multifaceted movement, Semenyaka has become a major nationalist theorist in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Content Revolution Set to Shake up Mipcom 2017
    16-19 October 2017, Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France Press Release RUSSIAN CONTENT REVOLUTION SET TO SHAKE UP MIPCOM 2017 PREMIERE DRAMA AND ANIMATION SCREENINGS TO REVEAL NEW VITALITY FROM RUSSIA Paris, 4 October 2017 – A century after the October Revolution in Russia, the Russian Content Revolution is taking place and will be in the spotlight at MIPCOM 2017. World Premiere Screenings, a series of International Screenings, conferences and networking opportunities will bring fresh high-end content from Russia to the attention of global TV industry. “This autumn marks the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution. Two of its protagonists were Lenin and Trotsky. Channel One will showcase on this occasion the docu-drama about Lenin based on previously-unseen archives, while Trotsky will be presented to audiences as the hero of a drama series,” said Konstantin Ernst, CEO of Channel One Russia, producer of the series “Trotsky”. The World Premiere Screening of “Trotsky”, presented by Channel One and Sreda Production, will be the flagship event of the Russian Content Revolution showcase. Its creators hope the series will be an international hit due to its high production values, compelling script, and its complex lead character. “Leon Trotsky was the real mastermind and executive of the October upheaval, virtually its producer. He is an international star of the last 100 years, a real pop-icon, a man of great achievements, who met a tragic fate. Our series is the first drama dedicated to Trotsky in the history of Russia, so we hope to rouse both Russian and international audiences’ interest in this project,” added Ernst.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS Perestroika and Soviet Military
    THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS No.5 OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel By Robert B. Davis A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington, Virginia PERESTROIKA AND SOVIET MILITARY PERSONNEL by Robert B. Davis THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER In 1988 the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) established within its existing organization a new entity known as the Institute of Land Warfare. Its purpose is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an AUSA Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that AUSA believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. S, OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel by Robert B. Davis Mr. Robert B. Davis is a research psychologist with the U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center in Charlottesville, Virginia. Mr. Davis received his undergraduate degree from Arkansas College and his advanced degree from Troy State University, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Nationalism: Contemporary Russian Nationalistic Movements
    88 FIIA Working Paper August 2015 Veera Laine MANAGED NATIONALISM CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN NATIONALISTIC MOVEMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE GOVERNMENT Veera Laine Research Fellow The Finnish Institute of International Affairs The Finnish Institute of International Affairs Kruunuvuorenkatu 4 FI-00160 Helsinki tel. +358 9 432 7000 fax. +358 9 432 7799 www.fiia.fi ISBN: 978-951-769-460-5 ISSN: 2242-0444 Language editing: Lynn Nikkanen The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is an independent research institute that produces high-level research to support political decision-making and public debate both nationally and internationally. All manuscripts are reviewed by at least two other experts in the field to ensure the high quality of the publications. In addition, publications undergo professional language checking and editing. The responsibility for the views expressed ultimately rests with the authors. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Research design and data used 6 1.2 Concepts and structure of the paper 9 2 THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENTS 12 2.1 The Eurasian Youth Union and the Russian March as examples of nationalism 15 2.2 The example movements’ ideas as presented today 18 2.3 EuroMaidan, Crimea, and “Novorossiya” 21 2.4 General notes on the Internet presence 23 2.5 The ideological basis of the movements 23 3 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE AND THE NATIONALISTS 25 3.1 Electoral protests 2011–2012 – the “Bolotnaya case” 25 3.2 Ethnic riots in Moscow in 2013 – the “Biryulevo case” 27 3.3 Russian Marches in Moscow in 2014 29 3.4 “Antimaidan” and the Russian Spring 32 4 CONCLUSIONS: MANAGED NATIONALISM – HOW IS IT ACHIEVED? 35 BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 3 SUMMARY This paper argues that nationalist movements in Russia can have a certain role to play in the Kremlin’s management of nationalism in the country, despite the fact that they might promote a very different form of nationalism than the state leadership itself.
    [Show full text]
  • S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report
    Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 115–21 PUTIN’S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY A MINORITY STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 10, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–110 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN. 9 REPORT FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER seneagle Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware CORY GARDNER, Colorado TOM UDALL, New Mexico TODD YOUNG, Indiana CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon RAND PAUL, Kentucky CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN.
    [Show full text]