DOCSLIB.ORG

Pupillage Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pupillage Policy Pupillage Policy Version Register Version Date Description of Key Changes Amended By 1.0 March 2017 First version Alison Pickup 1 Index The Public Law Project ............................................................................................................................ 3 The Justice First Fellowship .................................................................................................................... 4 Recruitment of pupils ............................................................................................................................... 5 Funding/salary arrangements .................................................................................................................. 5 Payment for travelling expenses and compulsory courses ...................................................................... 6 Pattern of pupillage .................................................................................................................................. 6 Roles and duties of the Fellow ................................................................................................................. 6 Roles and duties of the pupil supervisor .................................................................................................. 7 Pupillage checklists used ......................................................................................................................... 8 Method of fair distribution of work ............................................................................................................ 8 Assessment of progress .......................................................................................................................... 8 Complaints and grievance procedure ...................................................................................................... 9 Recruitment at the end of pupillage ......................................................................................................... 9 2 The Public Law Project The Public Law Project (PLP) is an independent national legal charity which aims to improve public decision making and facilitate access to justice. Within this broad remit PLP has adopted three main objectives: 1. Promoting and safeguarding the Rule of Law during a period of significant constitutional change 2. Working to ensure fair and proper systems for the exercise of public powers and duties, whether by state or private actors. 3. Improving practical access to public law remedies, including by seeking to ensure that justice reform is evidence led and by increasing knowledge of public law. PLP’s lawyers provide advice and representation acting for disadvantaged individuals and interest groups via civil proceedings (chiefly judicial review), and also complaints and Ombudsman schemes. Our cases are often brought on public interest grounds. We have often made third party interventions in proceedings brought by others to raise matters of public interest, particularly in relation to questions of access to justice and costs (including costs protection). In addition to casework, we run a vibrant events and conferencing programme. PLP also undertakes and publishes empirical research, and engages constructively with policy issues impacting the public law/access to justice landscape. PLP has a strong track record of strategic litigation on matters of public interest. Some significant examples include: • The establishment of guidelines for the exercise of the jurisdiction to grant a Protective Costs Order (Corner House Research v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192; [2005] 1 W.L.R. 2600) (As Third Party Intervener) • The circumstances in which a costs order should be made where judicial review proceedings are disposed of by consent pre-permission (R (Bahta) v SSHD [2011] EWCA Civ 895; [2011] C.P. Rep. 43) (As Third Party Intervener) • The availability of judicial review of a decision of the Upper Tribunal (R (Eba and Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2012] 1 AC 710) (as Third Party Intervener) • The correct application of the ‘second appeals test’ in CPR 52 to appeals from the Upper Tribunal in asylum cases (JD Congo v SSHD [2012] 1 W.L.R. 3273) (As Third Party Intervener) • Confirmation that legal aid regulations providing for no payment to be made for work on judicial review proceedings unless permission is granted were ultra vires (R (Ben Hoare Bell and others) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin)) (As Solicitors). • Supreme Court ruling that the imposition of a ‘residence test’ for civil legal aid would be ultra vires (R (PLP) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39) (As Claimant). PLP received the Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year 2015 ‘Outstanding Achievement’ Award. We are also Halsbury Award Winners having received the Special ‘Rule of Law’ Award in 2013, and PLP is a Guardian Charity Awards 2012 Winner. We are accredited by Lexcel and are a London Legal Support Trust Centre of Excellence. PLP’s casework team is led by its Legal Director and Deputy Legal Director. The Legal Director, Alison Pickup, is an employed barrister and PLP’s Pupillage Training Principal. Alison was the LAPG Legal Aid Barrister of the Year and Chambers and Partners Public Law and Human Rights Junior of the Year in 2015. She conducts advocacy in her own cases at PLP and, where appropriate, for other members of the casework team, as well as conducting litigation and overseeing the casework team’s work. She also has 3 responsibility for two of PLP’s casework projects, the Legal Aid Support Project and the Sanctioning Project. The Deputy Legal Director, Sara Lomri, is a solicitor and the SRA Training Principal. There are five other qualified solicitors in the casework team, and a trainee solicitor supervised by the Deputy Legal Director. PLP’s Director is also a solicitor although she does not actively conduct casework. The casework team is supported by a part-time casework administration assistant. PLP has a public law legal aid contract with the Legal Aid Agency which allows us to provide publicly funded advice and representation in public law proceedings. We also provide representation to individuals and charities in cases which advance our strategic objectives on a pro bono basis or under a conditional fee arrangement. The casework team also carries out projects which focus on specific systemic issues within our strategic objectives. The Justice First Fellowship PLP is offering 1 pupillage in its casework team as part of a Justice First Fellowship. For more information about the Justice First Fellowship (‘JFF’) please see https://jff.thelegaleducationfoundation.org/about/ The JFF at PLP is structured as follows for pupils: Year 1: The Fellow will be employed by PLP as a paralegal. He/she will gain an introduction to working in a legal advice organisation and will assist members of the casework team with their casework. The Fellow will be supervised by the Legal Director but on a day to day basis will work closely with other members of the casework team, providing exposure to the range of work undertaken by PLP. He/she will gain a valuable insight into the work of solicitors in the conduct of legal proceedings and gain an understanding of the legal aid scheme. As well as assisting on legal cases, the Fellow may be asked to help out with administrative tasks where needed, responding to enquiries, delivering bundles to court and other parties, and to assist the Events and Resources Development Manager with PLP’s training and conferences programme. During the first year, the Fellow will be encouraged to explore opportunities for gaining advocacy experience through pro bono work, and to undertake any relevant training. They will also begin to design and develop their JFF project, seeking to improve access to justice. Year 2: The Fellow will undertake pupillage, working under the day to day supervision of the Legal Director. The pupillage will be structured in accordance with the Pupillage Programme and with the objective of ensuring that the pupil can satisfy all of the Collyear outcomes of pupillage. The Fellow will work closely with the Legal Director on her cases, assisting her with a range of tasks, ranging from legal research, drafting advices, attending conferences with clients, corresponding with other parties, and attending court. He/she will also continue to assist other members of the casework team when required and subject to availability. The Fellow will be encouraged to take opportunities for advocacy experience through pro bono work and to speak at PLP conferences and events. During the second half of the 4 year the pupil will be given more responsibility for conducting his/her own cases including where appropriate conducting advocacy. Recruitment of pupils The pupillage will be advertised on the Pupillage Gateway, the JFF website, PLP’s website and through PLP’s networks. Prospective pupils will be required to complete an online application form through the JFF website. PLP will then shortlist candidates for interview on the basis of information provided in the online application form. It is envisaged that there will be a two-stage interview process for shortlisted candidates comprising: (1) submission of a sample of written work and participation in an assessed oral advocacy exercise (2) an interview with PLP’s Director, Legal Director and one other member of the casework team Candidates whose written work and/or oral advocacy exercise do not meet the required standard will not be invited for interview. Priority
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK
    2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith’s mix of formal and informal training is second to none. It enables those coming fresh from law school to quickly become familiar with complex concepts and provides them with the necessary tools to throw themselves into their team’s work right from the start. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Contents Law school The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) p.37 An introduction to the SQE with ULaw p.41 Solicitors’ timetable p.43 Barristers’ timetable p.44 The Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) p.45 The Legal Practice Course (LPC) p.49 The Bar Course p.52 How to fund law school p.55 Law school course providers p.57 Contents https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) From 2021 there’s going to be an entirely new way of qualifying as a solicitor replacing the GDL, LPC and training contract. If you’re thinking ‘SQE OMG!’ – don’t fear: here’s a quick guide. What’s going on? volve a practical testing ‘pilot’ with students. The regula- In winter 2016/17 the Solicitors Regulation Authority tor has stated that it expects various other providers (i.e. (SRA) dropped a bombshell on the legal profession: it was probably law schools and the current GDL/LPC providers) going ahead with its plan for the Solicitors Qualifying Ex- to offer preparatory courses for both stages of the SQE.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions on Complaints And
    Frequently Asked Questions on (iii) All relevant documents/correspondence 9. How does the ASDB deal with a complaint? Complaints and Disciplinary Proceedings Against relevant to the subject-matter of the (a) The ASDB will deliberate on a complaint to ascertain Advocates and Solicitors complaint; and whether there is merit on the issues as alleged; (iv) Chronological narration of all record of (b) Should there be merit in the complaint, the ASDB 1. What type of conduct can a complaint be based on? meetings and phone calls, record of documents may proceed to embark on the following: A complaint may be based on the professional misconduct or and/or correspondence to and/or from third (i) Direct that a DC be constituted to conduct a unsatisfactory professional conduct of a solicitor. party witnesses, and list of potential witnesses formal inquiry; or where applicable. (ii) Issue a Notice to the solicitor to appear to 2. What is professional misconduct? tender an explanation before the Board; and 5. What is the ASDB? Professional misconduct covers a broad range of acts and (c) Should there be no merit in the complaint, the ASDB The ASDB is a statutory body established under section 99(3) circumstances. Examples (the list is not exhaustive) may include: will dismiss the complaint without a formal hearing. (a) Dishonesty/Fraud; of the LPA. It is a body entrusted with powers to conduct (b) Contravening the Legal Profession Act (“LPA”) 1976 disciplinary proceedings against advocates and solicitors and to mete out appropriate punishments. 10. What is the composition of the DC? and any Rules or Rulings made there under; Three members; two of whom shall be legally qualified and one (c) Being found guilty or convicted of a serious offence; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Standards for Solicitor Advocates – Performance Indicators
    Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 section 25A (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/46) Rights of Audience in the Court of Session, the High Court of Justiciary, the Supreme Court and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Statutory requirements: 1) Completion to the satisfaction of the Council of a course of training in evidence and pleading in relation to proceedings in the Courts to which rights of audience are sought 2) Has such knowledge as appears to the Council to be appropriate of (1) the practice and procedure of and (2) professional conduct in regard to those Courts 3) That the Council is satisfied that the applicant is, having regard among other things to the applicant’s experience in appropriate proceedings in the sheriff court, otherwise a fit and proper person to have a right of audience in those Courts Rules C4:1 Rights of Audience in the Civil Courts (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules- and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor-advocates/rules/c41-rights-of- audience-in-the-civil-courts/), C4:2 Rights of Audience in the Criminal Courts (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor- advocates/rules/c42-rights-of-audience-in-the-criminal-courts/), C4:3 Order of Precedence, Instructions (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c- specialities/rule-c4-solicitor-advocates/rules/c43-order-of-precedence,-instructions- and-representation/), and Representation and C4:4 Conduct of Solicitor Advocates (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor- advocates/rules/c44-conduct-of-solicitor-advocates/) apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Bar Council Meeting Held on Saturday 7 July 2012 at the Bar Council Offices Present: Michael Todd QC Chairman
    Minutes of the Bar Council meeting held on Saturday 7 July 2012 at the Bar Council Offices Present: Michael Todd QC Chairman Maura McGowan QC Chairman-Elect Stephen Collier Treasurer Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Attorney General Mr Edward Garnier QC MP Solicitor General 61 further members of Bar Council attended. 1. Apologies Apologies for absence had been received from Keir Starmer QC, Dr Mirza Ahmad, Lesley Bates, Julia Beer, William Boyce QC, Lord Alex Carlile QC, Henry Carr QC, Michael Collard, Charlie Cory-Wright, Tom Crowther, Nicholas Cusworth QC, Lucy Frazer, Philippe Freund, Max Hardy, Fiona Jackson, Gregory Jones QC, Jennifer Josephs, Michael Kent QC, Taryn Lee QC, Fiona McCreath, Sailesh Mehta, Christina Michalos, Rick Pratt QC, Richard Salter QC, Geoffrey Tattersall QC, Francis Watson QC and Nicholas Worsley QC. 2. Approval of the Minutes and Matters Arising The minutes of the 14 April 2012 Bar Council meeting were approved. There were no matters arising from the minutes of the last meeting. 3. Statement by the Chairman The Chairman welcomed the Attorney General and Solicitor General and thanked them for making themselves available to attend. He also congratulated Nick Hilliard QC, Mark Lucraft QC and Philip Bartle QC, who have all been recently appointed to the Bench. The Chairman issued an interim statement in June due to the long gap between meetings and his statement for this meeting had also been circulated in advance. The Chairman said that he did not propose to read these aloud but asked if there were any questions. There were not. 4. BSB Report The BSB Chair's report had also been circulated prior to the meeting and Baroness Deech invited questions.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW BRIEFING: Barrister - the Basics
    The Careers Service. LAW BRIEFING: Barrister - the basics * Also includes information on Solicitor Advocate* 1) Academic Stage You must have a qualifying UK law degree, ie, an undergraduate law or law/dual degree – check using: www.sra.org.uk/students/academic-stage.page. If your first degree is non-law, you will need to complete a conversion course (GDL/PGDipLaw/CPE) - check providers and fees at: www.lawcabs.ac.uk. For further information about conversion courses see ‘Law Briefing: Getting into Law as a non-law student’. During you studies, find vacation mini-pupillages in chambers. This type of job shadowing/work experience usually lasts no more than a week and is essential to help you understand the work of a barrister and assess if it really is the job for you. Some chambers require applicants to undertake a mini-pupillage at their chambers if they wish to be considered for full pupillage later on. For more help with work experience, see ‘Law Briefing: Work experience’. NB: Most chambers prefer second year applicants. Use your first year to get other forms of work experience, such as court visits. Consider work experience in solicitors firms (made via speculative applications) to reassure yourself that being a barrister is the right choice. Getting non-law experience like a student job, volunteering or involvement in sports, clubs and societies is a great way to develop a range of skills you would need to be a barrister – see ‘Law Briefing: Skills for Lawyers’ and ‘Law Briefing: Commercial Awareness’. Read the legal pages of the newspapers regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Rankings 2015 2015
    GLOBAL M&A MARKET REVIEW LEGAL RANKINGS 2015 2015 GLOBAL M&A LEGAL ADVISORY RANKINGS The Bloomberg M&A Advisory League Tables are the definitive publication of M&A advisory rankings. The CONTENTS tables represent the top financial and legal advisors across a broad array of deal types, regions, and industry sectors. The rankings data is comprised of mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, debt-for-equity- 1. Introduction swaps, joint ventures, private placements of common equity and convertible securities, and the cash 2. Global M&A Year in Review injection component of recapitalization according to Bloomberg standards. 3. Global M&A Heat Map Bloomberg M&A delivers real-time coverage of the M&A market from nine countries around the world. We 4. Global M&A Regional Review provide a global perspective and local insight into unique deal structures in various markets through a 5. Global M&A League Tables network of over 800 financial and legal advisory firms, ensuring an accurate reflection of key market trends. 7. Americas M&A Regional Review Our quarterly league table rankings are a leading benchmark for legal and financial advisory performance, 8. Americas M&A League Tables and our Bloomberg Brief newsletter provides summary highlights of weekly M&A activity and top deal trends. 10. EMEA M&A Regional Review 11. EMEA M&A League Tables Visit {NI LEAG CRL <GO>} to download copies of the final release and a full range of market specific league 15. APAC M&A Regional Review table results. On the web, visit: http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solutions/investment-banking/.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Bar Standards Board
    Meeting of the Bar Standards Board Thursday 27 November 2014, 4.30 pm Room 1, First Floor, Bar Standards Board Offices, 289-293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ Agenda Part 1 – Public Page 1. Welcome and introductions Chair (4.30 pm) 2. Apologies Chair 3. Members’ interests and hospitality Chair 4. Approval of Part 1 (public) minutes: 23 October 2014 Annex A 3-10 5. Matters Arising Chair’s sign off of BTT Handbook; BPTC Handbook; General Guide to CPD; Pupillage Handbook. 6. a) Action points and progress Annex B Chair 11-16 b) Forward agendas Annex C Chair 17-18 Items for discussion 7. Performance Report for Q2 (Jul – Sept 2014) BSB 082 (14) Anne Wright 19-36 (4.40 pm) 8. BSB annual report on BTAS and the Browne BSB 083 (14) Vanessa Davies 37-53 recommendations (5.00 pm) 9. Chair’s Report on Visits and Meetings: BSB 084 (14) Chair 55-56 Oct 14 – Nov 14 10. Director General’s Report BSB 085 (14) Vanessa Davies 57-68 (5.20 pm) 11. Any other business (5.25 pm) 12. Date of next meetings Thursday 11 December 2014 (Board Away Day) Thursday 29 January 2015 (full Board meeting) 13. Private Session John Picken, Board & Committees Officer [email protected] 20 November 2014 BSB 271114 2 ANNEX A Part 1 - Public Part 1 - Public Minutes of the Bar Standards Board meeting Thursday 23 October 2014, Room 1.1, First Floor 289 – 293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ Present: Ruth Deech QC (Hon) (Chair) Patricia Robertson QC (Vice Chair) Rolande Anderson Rob Behrens Sarah Clarke (items 7-17) Justine Davidge Tim Robinson Andrew Sanders Anne Wright
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London
    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London • Unmissable human rights CPD event for 2018 • Keynote speeches from leaders in the field • Workshops on criminal justice, women’s human rights, earn judicial review, immigration and asylum, privacy, security and 6 cpd surveillance and life, death and human rights hours • The latest domestic and international human rights case-law • All income supports the work of JUSTICE Plenary speeches from: Panel sessions with: • Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill • Michael Fordham QC • Karon Monaghan QC • Harriet Wistrich • Angela Rafferty QC • Baroness Shami Chakrabarti • Nathalie Lieven QC • Max Hill QC • + many others to be confirmed follow us on twitter @justicehq PROGRAMME OF THE DAY Join JUSTICE 9.00 REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS JUSTICE is an all-party law reform and human rights organisation working to strengthen the justice system – administrative, civil and 9.30 CHAIR’S WELCOME criminal – in the United Kingdom. Andrea Coomber, Director, JUSTICE 9.45 MORNING KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE is independent JUSTICE is expert JUSTICE is influential Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill 10.15 REVIEW OF THE YEAR JUSTICE is effective JUSTICE is international Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix Chambers 11.00 COFFEE JUSTICE relies on the support of its members and donors for the funds to carry out its vital work. Please join us today. 11.30 MORNING WORKSHOPS 1. Criminal Justice and Human Rights 14.00 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS “Access to justice, human rights and the rule of law – as a lawyer and as a Chair: HH Peter Rook QC democrat, I can think of few causes more important to defend and extend.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Rankings 2017 2017
    GLOBAL M&A MARKET REVIEW LEGAL RANKINGS 2017 2017 GLOBAL M&A LEGAL ADVISORY RANKINGS The Bloomberg M&A Advisory League Tables are the definitive publication of M&A advisory rankings. The CONTENTS tables represent the top financial and legal advisors across a broad array of deal types, regions, and industry sectors. The rankings data is comprised of mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, debt-for-equity- 1. Introduction swaps, joint ventures, private placements of common equity and convertible securities, and the cash 2. Global M&A Heat Map injection component of recapitalization according to Bloomberg standards. 3. Global M&A Regional Review Bloomberg M&A delivers real-time coverage of the M&A market from nine countries around the world. We 4. Global M&A League Tables provide a global perspective and local insight into unique deal structures in various markets through a 6. Americas M&A Regional Review network of over 800 financial and legal advisory firms, ensuring an accurate reflection of key market trends. 7. Americas M&A League Tables Our quarterly league table rankings are a leading benchmark for legal and financial advisory performance, 9. EMEA M&A Regional Review and our Bloomberg Brief newsletter provides summary highlights of weekly M&A activity and top deal trends. 10. EMEA M&A League Tables 14. APAC M&A Regional Review Visit {NI LEAG CRL <GO>} to download copies of the final release and a full range of market specific league 15. APAC M&A League Tables table results. On the web, visit: http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solutions/investment-banking/.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Law Alumni Magazine — Issue Six 2020 Contents Welcome
    SHAPING LEEDS THE FUTURE LAW TOGETHER School of Law Alumni Magazine — Issue Six 2020 Contents Welcome FEATURES Welcome School of Law Alumni Magazine This year was always going to involve some change for the Law School with Professor Alastair Mullis moving to take up the role of Interim Executive EDITOR Beth Hastings-Trew Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the start of January 2020. School Support Office (Alumni and Communications) As Deputy Head of School I was to assume Our colleagues have responded to this new world As our very recent past has demonstrated we are the position of Interim Head of School during not only through dramatically reorienting how they more than capable of meeting the challenges Alastair’s term as Interim Executive Dean and it teach and support students, but also through ahead and we will continue to strive to make was to be a fairly straight-forward task of holding research that addresses the societal challenges a real difference to the world. Whether this is the fort until his return in January 2021. posed by COVID-19. This includes considering through our research or through supporting how it will impact international trade, crime our students to become graduates who will KEEP IN TOUCH In autumn 2019 School life continued much rates, the human rights implications of COVID-19 go out and make significant contributions to Phone: +44 (0)113 343 7209 as normal. legislation and the role of parks in a pandemic. society. This is, after all, the year when an Email: [email protected] Colleagues have reached out and spoken to alumnus of the Law School became the Leader Facebook: facebook.com/lawunileeds Twitter: @law_leeds We welcomed our new undergraduate students the media and policy makers on a number of of the Opposition (Sir Keir Starmer ‘85).
    [Show full text]
  • Trainee Solicitor Programme
    You r career in law “There is a strong emphasis placed on learning and development throughout your traineeship.” Julian Yarr, Managing Partner EW YORK, , N SA N N O F D R A N N O C L , I S T C S O A , F P L A E L B , O N A I L L T B O U D 800+ 95+ 6 100% Consistently ranked at the Total number of employees Partners International offices top of the Irish market Work with the best Our student and graduate programmes At A&L Goodbody (ALG), we work with the world’s top multinationals, financial institutions, entrepreneurs and investors. Our client work is challenging, complex and often ground-breaking. We will train you to thrive in this environment − to be the next generation of top international lawyers. A selection of our clients include: Ronan Lyons & Keavy Ryan Partners with responsibility for Trainee Solicitor Programme “At ALG, we see our trainee solicitors as the next generation of the firm’s lawyers and LawStart Summer Intern Student Placement Trainee Solicitor partners. Our commitment is to provide you, as Programme Programme Programme Programme a trainee solicitor, with the legal and business grounding you need to become an excellent corporate lawyer. As an ALG trainee solicitor, you will be working alongside our top corporate 65 60 15 35 lawyers across a range of legal practice areas, Trainee solicitors Places Places Places all of whom are experts in their field. Your hired each year talent and ambition will be fully nurtured and developed so that you will become the best 1 day 1 month 1-7 months 2.5 years lawyer you can be and a top adviser to our clients”.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Members Secretariat Team Mark Evan
    Commission on Justice in Wales Oral Evidence Session 18th January 2019 Present: Commission members Secretariat team Mark Evans (ME) Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Chair Andrew Felton, Simon Davies Secretary to the Paul Hopkins QC (PH) Professor Elwen Evans QC Commission Rhodri Williams QC (RW) Dr Nerys Llewelyn Jones Dave Gordon Juliet Lyon CBE Chris James Frances Edwards (FE) Sarah Payne CBE Rhys Thomas Professor Rick Rawlings Professor Peter Vaughan Question area: Welsh Government funding apprenticeships in the legal sector FE: CILEx believes there is an opportunity to expand legal apprenticeships to increase diversity in the legal sector and retain talent in Wales. Qualifying can’t be seen as “one size fits all” and there needs to be lower level apprenticeships feeding into higher level apprenticeships. Apprenticeships should not be seen by employers as a less valuable route into law than the university route. There is demand in Wales for apprenticeships leading to higher level qualifications but there is not a pool of providers at the moment. Employers may be dissuaded from following the apprenticeship route if there are onerous and bureaucratic requirements that relate to funding. Policy and funding models should take these factors into account and if so CILEx supports the expansion of apprenticeships in the legal sector. PH: If apprenticeship funding could be used to create means to fund additional pupillages in Wales, particularly in the field of civil law to build the cohort of civil practitioners in Wales, this would be something the Circuit would support. It is important to build the base of practitioners in Wales who could then do work for the Welsh Government.
    [Show full text]