DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report Catalogue no. 51-205-XIE Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report 2005 How to obtain more information Specific inquiries about this product and related statistics or services should be directed to: Aviation Statistics Centre, Transportation Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0T6 (Telephone: 1-613-951-0068; Internet: [email protected]). For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our website at www.statcan.ca. National inquiries line 1-800-263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1-800-700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1-800-889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Website www.statcan.ca Information to access the product This product, catalogue no. 51-205-XIE, is available for free in electronic format. To obtain a single issue, visit our website at www.statcan.ca and select Publications. Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are also published on www.statcan.ca under About us > Providing services to Canadians. Statistics Canada Transportation Division Aviation Statistics Centre Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report 2005 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Minister of Industry, 2007 All rights reserved. The content of this electronic publication may be reproduced, in whole or in part, and by any means, without further permission from Statistics Canada, subject to the following conditions: that it be done solely for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary, and/or for non-commercial purposes; and that Statistics Canada be fully acknowledged as follows: Source (or “Adapted from”, if appropriate): Statistics Canada, year of publication, name of product, catalogue number, volume and issue numbers, reference period and page(s). Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, by any means—electronic, mechanical or photocopy—or for any purposes without prior written permission of Licensing Services, Client Services Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0T6. May 2007 Catalogue no. 51-205-XIE ISSN 1480-7521 Frequency: Annual Ottawa La version fançaise de cette publication est disponible sur demande (no 51-205-XIF au catalogue). Note of appreciation Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not be produced without their continued cooperation and goodwill. Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report, 2005 Symbols The following standard symbols are used in Statistics Canada publications: . not available for any reference period .. not available for a specifi c reference period ... not applicable 0 true zero or a value rounded to zero 0s value rounded to 0 (zero) where there is a meaningful distinction between true zero and the value that was rounded p preliminary r revised x suppressed to meet the confi dentiality requirements of the Statistics Act E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Acknowledgements This publication was prepared in the Aviation Statistics Centre, Transportation Division, Statistics Canada under the general direction of Gord Baldwin, Director, Transportation Division and Bruce Meyer, Assistant Director. This publication is a product of the Airline Traffi c and Economic Analysis Unit, of which Kathie Davidson is the Unit Head. Annette Loebach was responsible for the Air Passenger Origin and Destination publication and Odile Lefebvre was also involved in the production. 4 Statistics Canada – catalogue no. 51-205 Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report, 2005 Table of contents Page Highlights 6 Introduction 8 Section I - The survey universe 8 Tables Transborder journeys 1. Summary in alphabetic order of city, total outbound and inbound passengers 10 2. Summary in order of traffi c volumes, total outbound and inbound passengers 16 3. Summary in order of traffi c volumes ranked by city-pair, exceeding 4,000 outbound and inbound passengers 22 4. Detailed presentation 29 Transborder portions of international journeys 5. Summary in alphabetical order of city, total outbound and inbound passengers 104 6. Summary in order of traffi c volumes, total outbound and inbound passengers 105 7. Summary in order of traffi c volumes ranked by city-pair, exceeding 4,000 outbound and inbound passengers 106 8. Detailed presentation 110 Notes to users 123 Methodology and data limitations 123 Factors which may have infl uenced the data 125 Glossary 127 Statistics Canada – catalogue no. 51-205 5 Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report, 2005 Highlights In 2005, just under 16.5 million scheduled passengers traveled between Canada and the United States, accounting for an increase of 6.0% (almost one million passengers) over the previous year. Figures for charter services are not yet available for 2005. This is the second consecutive year in history that traffi c volumes for scheduled services have been at their highest. In 2005, the distribution of transborder traffi c by province remained relatively unchanged as compared to 2004. The majority of all transborder traffi c went through Ontario (43.07%). Toronto (37.3%) and Montréal (15.4%) captured the majority of the traffi c between eastern Canada and the United States while Vancouver (17.6%) and Calgary (8.7%) attracted most of western Canada’s transborder traffi c. Text table 1 Air trips between Canada and the United States Total Passengers on Passengers on Year passengers scheduled fl ights charter fl ights 1 number 1990 11,339,720 9,090,720 2,249,000 1991 10,292,177 8,340,100 1,952,077 1992 10,828,665 8,702,740 2,125,925 1993 11,268,957 9,151,370 2,117,587 1994 10,964,186 8,879,630 2,084,556 1995 11,925,322 10,128,010 1,797,312 1996 13,444,453 12,632,940 811,513 1997 14,002,514 13,064,730 937,784 1998 14,379,433 14,109,820 269,613 1999 14,776,479 14,690,220 86,259 2000 15,444,270 15,263,800 180,470 2001 15,325,626 15,171,000 154,626 2002 15,111,321 r 14,811,740 r 299,581 2003 14,798,020 14,405,640 392,380 2004 15,931,286 15,529,790 401,496 2005 .. 16,462,110 .. 1. Statistics Canada, Charter On-Flight Origin and Destination Survey. Text table 2 Proportion of transborder passengers on scheduled fl ights by province and territory, 2004/2005 Passengers Province/territory 2004 2005 number percentage number percentage British Columbia 3,067,900 19.75 3,238,970 19.68 Alberta 1,950,980 12.56 2,108,320 12.81 Saskatchewan 207,700 1.34 219,270 1.33 Manitoba 390,740 2.52 411,600 2.50 Ontario 6,723,040 43.29 7,090,570 43.07 Quebec 2,581,530 16.62 2,748,330 16.69 New Brunswick 103,260 0.66 112,130 0.68 Nova Scotia 382,750 2.46 396,870 2.41 Prince Edward Island 22,080 0.14 25,160 0.15 Newfoundland and Labrador 92,240 0.59 103,460 0.63 Yukon Territory 5,550 0.04 5,710 0.03 Northwest Territories 1,830 0.01 1,480 0.01 Nunavut 190 0.00 240 0.00 Total 15,529,790 100.00 16,462,110 100.00 6 Statistics Canada – catalogue no. 51-205 Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report, 2005 Transborder travel continued to be concentrated in the states of California, Florida and to a lesser extent New York. While the number of transborder passengers increased between 2004 and 2005, the distribution by state remained essentially unchanged. Just over 18.4% of all transborder traffi c was concentrated in California; Florida stood at 13.1% and New York at 8.7%. Comparing 2004 and 2005, the largest percentage increase in passengers traveled was observed in Nevada (25.9%) and New York (15.0%). Text table 3 Proportion of transborder passengers on scheduled fl ights by state, 2004/2005 Passengers State 2004 2005 number percentage number percentage California 2,881,470 18.55 3,035,780 18.44 Florida 2,117,400 13.63 2,157,950 13.11 New York 1,244,410 8.01 1,431,100 8.69 Texas 926,420 5.97 1,011,610 6.15 Illinois 800,140 5.15 836,110 5.08 Nevada 672,040 4.33 846,190 5.14 New Jersey 562,840 3.62 584,100 3.55 Massachusetts 562,200 3.62 601,010 3.65 District of Columbia 486,240 3.13 506,600 3.08 Pennsylvania 435,110 2.80 464,090 2.82 Arizona 433,740 2.79 486,400 2.95 Georgia 419,090 2.70 448,690 2.73 Hawaii 350,580 2.26 326,880 1.99 Other 3,638,110 23.43 3,725,600 22.63 Total 15,529,790 100.00 16,462,110 100.00 Statistics Canada – catalogue no. 51-205 7 Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report, 2005 Introduction The publication Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report is published annually to provide users with estimates by directional origin and destination of the total passengers who traveled on scheduled commercial fl ights between Canada and the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airline Competition Plan Final Report
    Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 SUMMARY S-1 Summary AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN Philadelphia International Airport The City of Philadelphia, owner and operator of Philadelphia International Airport, is required to submit annually to the Federal Aviation Administration an airline competition plan. The City’s plan for 2000, as documented in the accompanying report, provides information regarding the availability of passenger terminal facilities, the use of passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues to fund terminal facilities, airline leasing arrangements, patterns of airline service, and average airfares for passengers originating their journeys at the Airport. The plan also sets forth the City’s current and planned initiatives to encourage competitive airline service at the Airport, construct terminal facilities needed to accommodate additional airline service, and ensure that access is provided to airlines wishing to serve the Airport on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms. These initiatives are summarized in the following paragraphs. Encourage New Airline Service Airlines that have recently started scheduled domestic service at Philadelphia International Airport include AirTran Airways, America West Airlines, American Trans Air, Midway Airlines, Midwest Express Airlines, and National Airlines. Airlines that have recently started scheduled international service at the Airport include Air France and Lufthansa. The City intends to continue its programs to encourage airlines to begin or increase service at the Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position
    航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 논문접수일 2018. 11. 30 2018년 12월 30일 발행, pp. 199~224 논문심사일 2018. 12. 14 http://dx.doi.org/10.31691/KASL33.2.6. 게재확정일 2018. 12. 30 Regulatory Aspects of Passenger and Crew Safety: Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Jan M. Davies* 46) CONTENTS Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Passenger and Crew Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Ⅲ. Regulations, and their Gaps, Relating to the Emergency Brace Position Ⅳ. Conclusions * Professor Jan M Davies MSc MD FRCPC FRAeS is a Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine in the Cumming School of Medicine and an Adjunct Professor of Psychology in the Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary. She is the chair of IBRACE, the International Board for Research into Aircraft Crash Events. (https://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Board_for_Research_into_Aircraft_Crash_Events) Amongst other publications, she is the co-author, with Linda Campbell, of An Investigation into Serial Deaths During Oral Surgery. In: Selby H (Ed) The Inquest Handbook, Leichardt, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press; 1998;150-169 and co-author with Drs. Keith Anderson, Christopher Pysyk and JN Armstrong of Anaesthesia. In: Freckelton I and Selby H (Eds). Expert Evidence. Thomson Reuters, Australia, 2017. E-Mail : [email protected] 200 航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 Ⅰ. Introduction Barely more than a century has passed since the first passenger was carried by an aircraft. That individual was Henri Farman, an Anglo-French painter turned aviator. He was a passenger on a flight piloted by Léon Delagrange, a French sculptor turned aviator, and aircraft designer and manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 81 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 The rT ansition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety? Renè David-Cooper Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Renè David-Cooper, The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J. Air L. & Com. 33 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol81/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. THE TRANSITION TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) IN AVIATION: IS CANADA DEREGULATING FLIGHT SAFETY? RENE´ DAVID-COOPER* ABSTRACT In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS) for airlines around the world. While most ICAO Member States worldwide are still in the early stages of introducing SMS, Canada became the first and only ICAO country in 2008 to fully implement SMS for all Canadian-registered airlines. This article will highlight the documented shortcomings of SMS in Canada during the implementation of the first ever SMS framework in civil aviation. While air carriers struggled to un- derstand and introduce SMS into their operations, this article will illustrate how Transport Canada (TC) did not have the knowledge or the necessary resources to properly guide airline operators during this transition, how SMS was improperly tai- lored for smaller air carriers, and how the Canadian govern- ment canceled safety inspections around the country, leaving many air carriers partially unregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeox FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA
    jEOX FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA 20th ANNUAL MEETING PROCEEDINGS TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY 1985 591 AT THE CROSSROADS - THE FINANCIAL HEALTH OF CANADA'S LEVEL I AIRLINES by R.W. Lake,. J.M. Serafin and A., Mozes Research Branch, Canadian Transport Commission INTRODUCTION In 1981 the Air Transport Committee and the 'Research Branch of the Canadian Transport Commission on a joint basis, and in conjunction with the major Canadian airlines, (who formed a Task Force) undertook a programme of studies concerning airline pricing and financial performance. This paper is based on a CTC Working Paper' which presented current data on the topic, and interpreted them in the context of the financial and regulatory circumstances faced by the airlines as of July 1984. ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE The trends illustrated in Figure 1 suggest that air trans- portation may have reached the stage of a mature industry with air . travel/transport no longer accounting for an increasing proportion of economic activity. This mile/stone in the industry's life cycle, if in fact it has been reached, would suggest that an apparent fall in the income elasticity of demand for air travel between 1981 and 1983 could persist. As data reflecting the apparent demand re- surgence of 1984 become available, the picture may change, but 1 LAKE Figure 2 Figure 1 AIR FARE INDICES AIR TRANSPORT REVENUE AS A PERCENT OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT 1.90 1.20.. 1.80. 1.70 - 1.10 -, 1.60. ..... 1.50. .. 8 .: . 1.40 -, r,.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected]
    Equity Research Airlines / Rated: Market Underweight September 15, 2005 Research Analyst(s): David Strine 212 272-7869 [email protected] Bankruptcy tilts playing field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected] Key Points *** TWIN BANKRUPTCY FILINGS TILT PLAYING FIELD. NWAC and DAL filed for Chapter 11 protection yesterday, becoming the 20 and 21st airlines to do so since 2000. Now with 47% of industry capacity in bankruptcy, the playing field looks set to become even more lopsided pressuring non-bankrupt legacies to lower costs further and low cost carriers to reassess their shrinking CASM advantage. *** CAPACITY PULLBACK. Over the past 20 years, bankrupt carriers decreased capacity by 5-10% on avg in the year following their filing. If we assume DAL and NWAC shrink by 7.5% (the midpoint) in '06, our domestic industry ASM forecast goes from +2% y/y to flat, which could potentially be favorable for airline pricing (yields). *** NWAC AND DAL INTIMATE CAPACITY RESTRAINT. After their filing yesterday, NWAC's CEO indicated 4Q:05 capacity could decline 5-6% y/y, while Delta announced plans to accelerate its fleet simplification plan, removing four aircraft types by the end of 2006. *** BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES LIKELY TO BE LOW COST CARRIERS. NWAC and DAL account for roughly 26% of domestic capacity, which, if trimmed by 7.5% equates to a 2% pt reduction in industry capacity. We believe LCC-heavy routes are likely to see a disproportionate benefit from potential reductions at DAL and NWAC, with AAI, AWA, and JBLU in particular having an easier path for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • Netletter #1454 | January 23, 2021 Trans-Canada Air Lines 60Th
    NetLetter #1454 | January 23, 2021 Trans-Canada Air Lines 60th Anniversary Plaque - Fin 264 Dear Reader, Welcome to the NetLetter, an Aviation based newsletter for Air Canada, TCA, CP Air, Canadian Airlines and all other Canadian based airlines that once graced the Canadian skies. The NetLetter is published on the second and fourth weekend of each month. If you are interested in Canadian Aviation History, and vintage aviation photos, especially as it relates to Trans-Canada Air Lines, Air Canada, Canadian Airlines International and their constituent airlines, then we're sure you'll enjoy this newsletter. Please note: We do our best to identify and credit the original source of all content presented. However, should you recognize your material and are not credited; please advise us so that we can correct our oversight. Our website is located at www.thenetletter.net Please click the links below to visit our NetLetter Archives and for more info about the NetLetter. Note: to unsubscribe or change your email address please scroll to the bottom of this email. NetLetter News We have added 333 new subscribers in 2020 and 9 new subscribers so far in 2021. We wish to thank everyone for your support of our efforts. We always welcome feedback about Air Canada (including Jazz and Rouge) from our subscribers who wish to share current events, memories and photographs. Particularly if you have stories to share from one of the legacy airlines: Canadian Airlines, CP Air, Pacific Western, Eastern Provincial, Wardair, Nordair, Transair, Air BC, Time Air, Quebecair, Calm Air, NWT Air, Air Alliance, Air Nova, Air Ontario, Air Georgian, First Air/Canadian North and all other Canadian based airlines that once graced the Canadian skies.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncontrolled Descent and Collision with Terrain, United Airlines 585
    PB2001-910401 NTSB/AAR-01/01 DCA91MA023 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 5498C Aircraft Accident Report Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 RAN S P T O L R A T LURIBUS N P UNUM A E O T I I O T N A N S A D FE R NTSB/AAR-01/01 T Y B OA PB2001-910401 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 5498C 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted March 27, 2001 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2001. Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain, United Airlines Flight 585, Boeing 737-200, N999UA, 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado, Springs, Colorado, March 3, 1991. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-01/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This amended report explains the accident involving United Airlines flight 585, a Boeing 737-200, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain 4 miles south of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado Springs, Colorado, on March 3, 1991. Safety issues discussed in the report are the potential meterological hazards to airplanes in the area of Colorado Springs; 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; and the design of the main rudder power control unit servo valve. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Air Ontario | 1
    Clean Air Ontario | 1 UPDATE CLEAN AIR ONTARIO Recognizing Nuclear’s Role in Supporting Coal Phase-Out to Achieve Long-term Climate Change Goals In 2005, the Greater Toronto Area suffered from 53 smog days. Through coal phase-out and clean air initatives, the province had zero smog days in 2015. 2005 smog days = 53 2015 smog days = 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 1 Message from Michael W . Rencheck . 2 Message from Vanessa Foran . 3 Global Climate Change Challenge . 4 Importance of an Emissions-free, Balanced Supply Mix . 8 The 1990s: Ontario’s Growth in Coal Use . 10 Climate Change, Allergies and Asthma . 11 Health Costs of Poor Air Quality . 12 How did Ontario Phase Out Coal? . 14 Role of Bruce Power Nuclear . 15 Meeting Ontario’s Long-term Climate Change Goals . 16 Electricity Price Stability & Economic Considerations . 18 References . 25 Asthma Society of Canada The Asthma Society of Canada is the only national, volunteer-driven charity, solely devoted to enhancing the quality of life for people living with asthma and respiratory allergies . For more than 40 years, the Asthma Society of Canada has proudly served as the national voice for Canadians living with asthma; investing in asthma research in Canada and empowering patients with evidence- based information, education programs and support services . Bruce Power Bruce Power is Canada’s only private sector nuclear generator, operating the world’s largest operating nuclear facility . Bruce Power is a Canadian-owned partnership of TransCanada Corp ., Borealis Infrastructure (a trust established by the Ontario Municipal Employees Retire System), the Power Workers’ Union and The Society of Energy Professionals .
    [Show full text]