William Labov Unendangered Dialect, Endangered People

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Labov Unendangered Dialect, Endangered People TRAA 1066 Dispatch: 27.1.10 Journal: TRAA CE: Lalitha Rao Journal Name Manuscript No. B Author Received: No. of pages: 14 Op: Chris/TMS 1 WILLIAM LABOV 51 2 52 3 UNENDANGERED DIALECT,ENDANGERED PEOPLE:THE CASE 53 4 54 5 OF AFRICAN AMERICAN VERNACULAR ENGLISH 55 6 56 7 57 8 58 9 African American Vernacular English (AAVE) is not The primary condition for such divergence is resi- 59 10 an endangered language variety; on the contrary, it is dential segregation. 60 11 continuing to develop, as all languages, and to diverge Residential segregation, combined with increasing 61 12 from other varieties. The primary correlates of such poverty, has led to a deterioration of many 62 13 divergence are residential segregation and poverty, features of social life in the inner cities. 63 14 which are part of a developing transgenrational cycle In these conditions, a majority of children in inner 64 15 that includes also crime, shorter life spans, and low city schools are failing to learn to read, with a 65 16 educational achievement. The most immediate challenge developing cycle of poverty, crime, and shorter life 66 17 is creating more effective educational programs on a span. 67 18 larger scale. In confronting residential segregation, we Reduced residential segregation will lead to great- 68 19 must be aware that its reduction will lead to greater er contact between speakers of AAVE and 69 20 contact between speakers of AAVE and speakers of speakers of other dialects. 70 21 other dialects. Recent research implies that, if residen- If, at some future date, the social conditions that 71 22 tial integration increases significantly, AAVE as favor the divergence of AAVE are altered, then 72 23 a whole may be in danger of losing its distinctiveness AAVE in its present form may become an endan- 73 24 as a linguistic resource. While many of us would regret a gered dialect. 74 25 decrease in the eloquent syntactic and semantic options 75 26 of AAVE and its possible withering away, we must also THE UNENDANGERED DIALECT 76 consider that the loss of a dialect is a lesser evil than the 27 8 Among all the nonstandard dialects that have been 77 endangerment AAVE speakers currently confront. Q1 28 7 described in the history of linguistics, AAVE is the 78 29 KEYWORDS: African American Vernacular most closely and extensively studied. (Note that 79 30 English (AAVE), dialect divergence, education, liter- there is also a standard variety of African American 80 31 acy, race/racism, segregation, language endangerment English. See, e.g., Spears 2007.) From the mid 1960s 81 32 to the present, studies of its invariant and variable 82 33 features have been published for urban speech com- 83 34 INTRODUCTION munities throughout the United States (New York: 84 35 In the 21st century, linguists are very much concerned Labov 1972; Labov et al. 1968; Detroit: Edwards 1992; 85 36 with the rapid decline and disappearance of the ma- Wolfram 1969; Philadelphia: Ash and Myhill 1986; 86 37 jority of the world’s languages, most of them subject Labov and Harris 1986; Washington, DC: Fasold 87 38 to unequal treatment; and, much of our effort is de- 1972; the Bay area: Mitchell-Kernan 1969; Rickford 88 39 voted to social change that can reverse this process. and McNair-Knox 1993; Rickford et al. 1991; Los 89 40 This report will deal with another aspect of inequal- Angeles: Baugh 1979, 1983, 1984, 1999; Legum et al. 90 41 ity.1 I will be looking at social factors that lead dialects 1972; Columbus: Weldon 1994). Regional differences 91 42 to diverge, develop, and flourish, and forms of cultural have appeared in only a few phonological features. (In 92 43 diversity that need no help to survive. In the final cities with r-ful White vernaculars, African Americans 93 44 summary, I will have to say that I wish the world were show lower levels of r-vocalization than in cities with 94 45 otherwise, because this flourishing dialect is closely r-less vernaculars, Myhill 1988.) AAVE emerges as a 95 46 associated with the oppression, discouragement, and geographically uniform system with the following 96 47 death of its speakers. general characteristics: 97 48 The argument of this paper may be outlined as First, AAVE maintains a fairly uniform sound 98 49 follows: system, based on a modification of the Southern 99 50 African American Vernacular English (AAVE) is States vowel pattern, and does not participate in 100 51 not an endangered dialect; on the contrary, it is con- sound changes characteristic of surrounding White 101 52 tinuing to develop and diverge from other dialects. vernaculars. Remember that all living languages 102 53 103 54 104 Transforming Anthropology, Vol. 18, Number 1, pp. 15–28, ISSN 1051-0559, electronic ISSN 1548-7466. & 2010 by the American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-7466.2010.01066.x. 15 (BWUS TRAA 1066 Webpdf:=01/27/2010 06:15:20 487072 Bytes 14 PAGES n operator=M.Chackalayil) 1/27/2010 6:15:37 PM TRAA 1066 1 change over time, sometimes very slowly, sometimes A similar alignment is found with the simplifi- 51 2 more rapidly. In New York City, African Americans cation of coronal clusters. The higher quantitative 52 3 were found to be shifting the nucleus of/ay/in why, level in AAVE compared with other dialects is 53 4 wide, et cetera to the front, while in the White popu- largely due to a qualitative difference in the effect 54 5 lation, a new and vigorous change was moving the of following pause on simplification. In AAVE, 55 6 vocalic nucleus further and further back of center following pauses favor simplification, while in 56 8 Q2 7 (Labov 1966, 1994). In Philadelphia, the fronting of/ other dialects this environment has a disfavoring 57 7 8 aw/is an absolute differentiator of White and Black effect on simplification, resulting in higher overall 58 9 speech patterns, so that in an experimental study the rates of simplification in AAVE (Guy 1980). 59 10 controlled raising of the second formant of/aw/in Third, several morphosyntactic features present 60 11 out and house converted the perceived identity of the in most varieties of English are absent in the under- 61 12 speaker from Black to White (Graff et al. 1986). At lying grammar of AAVE. Quantitative and 62 13 Calumet College in Chicago, African Americans qualitative differences between AAVE and other 63 14 showed no tendency to participate in the Northern dialects is illustrated in figure 1, based on a study of 64 15 Cities ShiftFthe raising of/æ/, fronting of/o/and 287 elementary school children in low-income 65 16 backing of/e/–characteristic of the White population schools (Labov 2001; Labov and Baker 2008). These 66 17 (Gordon 2000). In cities of the North, the Midland children are a random sample of recordings of a lar- 67 18 and the West, such phonetic patterns immediately ger group of 721 struggling readers. They were 68 19 differentiate the speech of African Americans from recorded in a relatively formal situation, in a school 69 20 that of the local Whites. setting, but with sociolinguistic techniques that shift 70 21 Second, several phonological constraints on speech style toward the vernacular. For all four 71 22 leniting sound changes are aligned with those oper- variables, the vertical axis represents the percent ab- 72 23 ating in other English dialects but operate at higher sence of the consonant involved. The differences 73 24 frequencies. The alignment of AAVE with general among the four language/ethnic groups are quanti- 74 25 sociolinguistic variables was first demonstrated in tative forFt,d deletion and copula absence but 75 26 the study of auxiliary and copula deletion, where qualitative for absence of attribute possessive fsg 76 27 deletion was found to be governed by the same and third-singularfsg. ForFt,d deletion, Blacks 77 28 constraints as contraction in other dialects (Labov and Latinos show 55–65 percent absence and Whites 78 29 1969). The major grammatical constraints on cop- 40 percent; for copula absence, Blacks and Latinos 79 30 ula/auxiliary deletion are replicated regularly in are clustered at a much lower level, and Whites are 80 31 many different geographic areas, with future tense close to zero. In contrast, the Black children are close 81 32 favoring deletion over progressive over following to 70 percent absence for attributive possessivefsg 82 33 locative/adjective over following noun phrase (e.g., and verbal fsg, far different from Latinos and com- 83 34 Rickford et al. 1991).2 pletely different from Whites. 84 35 85 36 86 37 87 38 80% 88 39 89 70% 40 90 41 60% 91 42 92 50% 43 African-American 93 White 44 40% Latino(Span) 94 45 Latino(Eng) 95 30% 46 96 Percent absence 47 20% 97 48 98 49 10% 99 50 0% 100 51 -t,d deletion Possessive {s} 3rd sg. {s} Copula {s} 101 52 Figure 1. Percent absence for four linguistic variables for African-American elementary school children in Philadelphia, 102 53 Atlanta, and California by language and ethnic-group (N 5 287). Latino(Span), Latinos who learned to read in Spanish first; 103 54 Latino(Eng), Latinos who learned to read in Spanish first. 104 16 TRANSFORMING ANTHROPOLOGY VOL. 18(1) (BWUS TRAA 1066 Webpdf:=01/27/2010 06:15:20 487072 Bytes 14 PAGES n operator=M.Chackalayil) 1/27/2010 6:15:37 PM TRAA 1066 1 Fourth, variable past tense marking due to high The semantic content of this combination is not 51 2 levels of consonant cluster simplification is rein- simply that B will follow A, but that B will inevitably 52 3 forced by the use of had as a past tense marker.
Recommended publications
  • The Authentic Speaker Revisited: a Look at Ethnic Perception Data from White Hip Hoppers
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 9 Issue 2 Papers from NWAV 31 Article 6 2003 The authentic speaker revisited: A look at ethnic perception data from white hip hoppers Cecilia Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Cutler, Cecilia (2003) "The authentic speaker revisited: A look at ethnic perception data from white hip hoppers," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 9 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol9/iss2/6 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol9/iss2/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The authentic speaker revisited: A look at ethnic perception data from white hip hoppers This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol9/iss2/6 The Authentic Speaker Revisited: A Look at Ethnic Perception Data from White Hip Hoppers Cecilia Cutler 1 Introduction The ever-expanding popularity of rap music and hip hop culture exposes urban and suburban white youth to the speech of urban black youth. This paper examines how nine white middle class hip hoppers are identified in terms of ethnicity on the basis of their speech by undergraduate students. Additionally, it makes reference to past debates about what constitutes an authentic speaker and proposes that we reconsider the value of a socially­ defmed authenticity. In 1976, Eileen Hatala completed a study of the speech of a 13 year-old white girl ("Carla") who grew up in a predominantly African-American working class neighborhood in Camden, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 20Th Annual Round Table
    Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics lumber 22, 1969 edited by James E. Alatis 20th Annual Round Table Linguistics and the Teaching of Standard English To Speakers of Other Languages or Dialects Georgetown University School of Languages and Linguistics REPORT OF THE TWENTIETH ANNUAL ROUND TABLE MEETING ON LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE STUDIES JAMES E. ALATIS EDITOR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS Washington, D.C. 20007 © Copyright 1970 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS SCHOOL OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 58-31607 Lithographed in U.S.A. by EDWARDS BROTHERS, INC. Ann Arbor, Michigan CONTENTS Introduction vii WELCOMING REMARKS Reverend Frank Fadner, S. J. Regent, School of Languages and Linguistics xi Dean Robert Lado Dean, School of Languages and Linguistics xiii FIRST SESSION Theoretical Linguistics and Its Implications for Teaching SESOLD Chairman: Charles W. Kreidler, Georgetown University William Labov The Logic of Nonstandard English 1 Raven I. McDavid, Jr. A Theory of Dialect 45 Rudolph C. Troike Receptive Competence, Productive Competence, and Performance 63 Charles T. Scott Transformational Theory and English as a Second Language/Dialect 75 David W. Reed Linguistics and Literacy 93 FIRST LUNCHEON ADDRESS Harold B. Allen The Basic Ingredient 105 iv / CONTENTS SECOND SESSION Applied Linguistics and the Teaching of SESOLD: Materials, Methods, and Techniques Chairman: David P. Harris, Georgetown University Peter S. Rosenbaum Language Instruction and the Schools 111 Betty W. Robinett Teacher Training for English as a Second Dialect and English as a Second Language: The Same or Different? 121 Eugene J. Briere Testing ESL Skills among American Indian Children 133 Bernard Spolsky Linguistics and Language Pedagogy—Applications or Implications ? 143 THIRD SESSION Sociolinguistics: Sociocultural Factors in Teaching SESOLD Chairman: A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Philadelphia Dialect Ryan Wall [email protected]
    La Salle University La Salle University Digital Commons HON499 projects Honors Program Fall 11-29-2017 A Jawn by Any Other Name: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Philadelphia Dialect Ryan Wall [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/honors_projects Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, and the Other Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Wall, Ryan, "A Jawn by Any Other Name: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Philadelphia Dialect" (2017). HON499 projects. 12. http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/honors_projects/12 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in HON499 projects by an authorized administrator of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Jawn by Any Other Name: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Philadelphia Dialect Ryan Wall Honors 499 Fall 2017 RUNNING HEAD: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE PHILADELPHIA DIALECT 2 Introduction A walk down Market Street in Philadelphia is a truly immersive experience. It’s a sensory overload: a barrage of smells, sounds, and sights that greet any visitor in a truly Philadelphian way. It’s loud, proud, and in-your-face. Philadelphians aren’t known for being a quiet people—a trip to an Eagles game will quickly confirm that. The city has come to be defined by a multitude of iconic symbols, from the humble cheesesteak to the dignified Liberty Bell. But while “The City of Brotherly Love” evokes hundreds of associations, one is frequently overlooked: the Philadelphia Dialect.
    [Show full text]
  • John Rickford
    VITA, John R. Rickford, July 2019, p. 1 CURRICULUM VITAE, JOHN R. RICKFORD (July 2019) Professor, Department of Linguistics, Emeritus J.E. Wallace Sterling Professor of the Humanities, Emeritus Bass University Fellow in Undergraduate Education President, Linguistic Society of America (2015) Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2016-) Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2150 Work: (650)-725-1565 Fax: (650) 723-5666 Department Office: (650) 723-4284 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.johnrickford.com A. IDENTIFYING DATA Date of Birth: September 16, 1949 Place of Birth: Georgetown, Guyana (South America) Citizenship: United States citizen Marital Status: Married to Angela, with four children: Shiyama, Russell, Anakela, Luke B. ACADEMIC HISTORY 1. Colleges and Universities Attended University of California, Santa Cruz [UCSC], 1968-71 University of Pennsylvania, 1971-79 2. Degrees 1971 BA, Sociolinguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz Highest Honors (academic); Stevenson College Honors 1973 MA, Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania 1979 PhD, Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania 3. Scholarships and Academic Honors 1960 Guyana Government Scholarship for secondary education 1965 Queen’s College prize for best results at London University General Certificate of Education (GCE) Ordinary Level exams 1967 Wishart Memorial Prize for distinction in English at London University GCE Advanced Level exams 1968 Fulbright/IIE Grant for undergraduate study in US 1970 First Prize, Stevenson College oratory competition, UCSC 1984 Dean’s Award for Distinguished Teaching, Stanford 1992 Bing Fellowship for Excellence in Teaching, Stanford 1998 Martin Luther King Centennial Professorship, Stanford 2000 American Book Award (for Spoken Soul), Before Columbus Foundation 2001 Elected Chair of the Stanford University Faculty Senate for 2001-02 2002 Anthropology and the Media Award (American Anthropology Association) VITA, John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Editors Rena Torres Cacoullos Pennsylvania State University William Labov University of Pennsylvania
    09543945_25-1.qxd 3/14/13 12:07 PM Page 1 VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1 2013 Volume 25 Number 1 2013 CONTENTS ANTHONY JULIUS NARO AND MARIA MARTA PEREIRA SCHERRE Remodeling the age variable: Number concord in Brazilian Portuguese 1 LAUREL MACKENZIE Variation in English auxiliary realization: A new take on contraction 17 YOUSEF AL-ROJAIE Regional dialect leveling in Najdi Arabic: The case of the deaffrication 25,Volume Number 1 2013 1–118 Pages of [k] in the Qas.¯mıı ¯ dialect 43 DANIEL WIECHMANN AND ARNE LOHMANN Domain minimization and beyond: Modeling prepositional phrase ordering 65 JOHN C. PAOLILLO Individual effects in variation analysis: Model, software, and research design 89 Editors Rena Torres Cacoullos Pennsylvania State University William Labov University of Pennsylvania Instructions for Contributors on inside back cover Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/lvc Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 25 Sep 2021 at 17:52:18, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000021 09543945_25-1.qxd 3/14/13 12:07 PM Page 2 notes for contributors Language Variation and Change publishes original publication, and, where relevant, the page(s) referred to: research reports that are based on data of language (Vincent, 1982:90–91). If the author’s name is part of the EDITORS production, either oral or written, from contemporary text, the following form should be used: “Vincent (1982) RENA TORRES CACOULLOS WILLIAM LABOV or historical sources.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGE and LINGUISTICS on TRIAL: HEARING RACHEL JEANTEL (AND OTHER VERNACULAR SPEAKERS) in the COURTROOM and BEYOND John R. Rickford Sharese King
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS ON TRIAL: HEARING RACHEL JEANTEL (AND OTHER VERNACULAR SPEAKERS) IN THE COURTROOM AND BEYOND John R. Rickford Sharese King Stanford University Stanford University Rachel Jeantel was the leading prosecution witness when George Zimmerman was tried for killing Trayvon Martin, but she spoke in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and her crucial testimony was dismissed as incomprehensible and not credible. The disregard for her speech in court and the media is familiar to vernacular speakers and puts Linguistics itself on trial: following Saussure, how do we dispel such ‘prejudices ’ and ‘fictions ’? We show that Jeantel speaks a highly systematic AAVE, with possible Caribbean influence. We also discuss voice qual - ity and other factors that bedeviled her testimony, including dialect unfamiliarity and institutional - ized racism. Finally, we suggest strategies for linguists to help vernacular speakers be better heard in courtrooms and beyond. * Keywords : AAVE, vernacular dialects, forensic linguistics, language attitudes, sociolinguistics, of what use is linguistics? ‘Da ’s how I speak. He cannot hear me that well. ’—Rachel Jeantel, in courtroom testimony , State of Florida v. George Zimmerman trial, June 27, 2013, pp . 229– 30 of court reporter ’s transcript ‘Ain ’t no justice. That ’s why they got that statue of her and got her blindfolded. Common sense would tell you if anybody need to see, she do. There ain ’t no justice. ’—Memphis, in August Wilson ’s play, Two trains running , 1992 ‘Finally, of what use is linguistics? … in the lives of individuals and societies , speech is more important than anything else. That linguistics should continue to be the prerogative of a few specialists would be unthinkable—everyone is concerned with it in one way or another.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae January, 2016
    Gregory Riordan Guy Curriculum Vitae January, 2016 PERSONAL Place of Birth Washington, D.C., USA Date of Birth 23 August 1950 Citizenship US Citizen; Canadian Citizen (dual nationality) Addresses University: Department of Linguistics, New York University 10 Washington Place New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (416) 998-7947 e-mail: [email protected] Home: 3 Washington Sq. Village, Apt 14F New York, NY 10012 Telephone: (212) 260-3230 Degrees and Academic/Professional Qualifications 1981 Ph.D., Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., USA. Title of Ph.D. dissertation: Linguistic variation in Brazilian Portuguese: Aspects of the phonology, syntax, and language history. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International, 1981. Republished 1983: Sydney: University of Sydney, Department of Linguistics. 1975 M.A., Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., USA. Title of M.A. thesis: "Variation in the group and the individual: the case of final stop deletion." Published 1980, in William Labov, ed. Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1972 B.A., English Language and Literature, Boston University, Boston, Mass., USA. 1968 B.A., Central High School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Additional Courses 1973 Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, University of Michigan: Michael Halliday. ‘Cohesion in Discourse’ Derek Bickerton. ‘Pidgin and Creole Linguistics’ James Matisoff. ‘Southeast Asian Linguistics’ Current Position 2001-present Professor, Department of Linguistics, New
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Cantonese Sociolinguistic Patterns: Correlating Social Characteristics of Speakers with Phonological Variables in Hong Kong Cantonese Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1sn2f75h Author Bauer, Robert Publication Date 1982 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Cantonese Sociolinguistic Patterns: Correlating Social Characteristics of Speakers with Phonological Variables in Hong Kong Cantonese By Robert Stuart Bauer A.B. (Southwest Missouri State College) 1969 M.A. (University of California) 1975 C.Phil. (University of California) 1979 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OE PHILOSOPHY in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Approved t-—\ Chairman , x? Date i J, 4 (A DOCTORAL DEGREE COiU JUNE 19, 1982 i ACKNOWLEDGMENT My first year of research in Hong Kong during which time I retooled my Cantonese, planned the design of this research project, and prepared the interview questions was supported by a U.S. Department of State Teaching Fellowship at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. In my second year in Hong Kong, a U.S. Department of Education Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship eliminated financial anxiety and made it possible to concentrate exclu­ sively on conducting the linguistic interviews and other phases of the research. It was in this second year that I lived on Lamma Island, a welcome refuge from the hustle and crush of Hong Kong and the closest thing to a pastoral paradise one could hope for in a place like Hong Kong. I now look back on that year as the happiest time in my life.
    [Show full text]
  • African American Vernacular English Erik R
    Language and Linguistics Compass 1/5 (2007): 450–475, 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00029.x PhonologicalErikBlackwellOxford,LNCOLanguage1749-818x©Journal02910.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00029.xAugust0450???475???Original 2007 Thomas 2007 UKThecompilationArticles Publishing and Authorand Linguistic Phonetic © Ltd 2007 CharacteristicsCompass Blackwell Publishing of AAVE Ltd Phonological and Phonetic Characteristics of African American Vernacular English Erik R. Thomas* North Carolina State University Abstract The numerous controversies surrounding African American Vernacular English can be illuminated by data from phonological and phonetic variables. However, what is known about different variables varies greatly, with consonantal variables receiving the most scholarly attention, followed by vowel quality, prosody, and finally voice quality. Variables within each domain are discussed here and what has been learned about their realizations in African American speech is compiled. The degree of variation of each variable within African American speech is also summarized when it is known. Areas for which more work is needed are noted. Introduction Much of the past discussion of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) has dealt with morphological and syntactic variables. Such features as the invariant be (We be cold all the time), copula deletion (We cold right now), third-person singular -s absence (He think he look cool) and ain’t in place of didn’t (He ain’t do it) are well known among sociolinguists as hallmarks of AAVE (e.g. Fasold 1981). Nevertheless, phonological and phonetic variables characterize AAVE just as much as morphosyntactic ones, even though consonantal variables are the only pronunciation variables in AAVE that have attracted sustained attention. AAVE has been at the center of a series of controversies, all of which are enlightened by evidence from phonology and phonetics.
    [Show full text]
  • June 27 African American Class by Baugh.Pdf
    HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS AND AN INTRODUCTION TO SALIENT LINGUISTIC FEATURES June 27, 2019 African American Language/African American (vernacular) English CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH SCHEDULE FOR TODAY If you are willing: Would you mind sharing some of the details about your dinner discussion regarding ways in which people of African descent refer to themselves? An overview of some of the prominent scholars who have discussed historical matters for AAL A survey of some of the better known and lesser known historical theories A brief (and somewhat simplistic) introduction to some of the prominent linguistic features of AAVE CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH WHAT’S IN A NAME? Postive Terminology Neutral Terminology Negative Terminology People of African descent: U.S. and Elsewhere Marginalized people in other parts of the world. Insider perspectives vs. Outsider perspectives: Who can say what without being offensive (or perhaps insensitive)? CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH INITIAL COLONIAL CONACT CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH Before Slavery: Why not force the indigenous people to work? LINGUISTIC IMPLICATIONS? & WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? Who Shares a common Language? How do they Communicate? CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH A TYPICAL BILL OF SALE OF A SLAVE Difficult to Read; however, it is a legally binding contract, which was impactful in many colonies and those states that legalized Slavery. CLASS BY JOHN BAUGH WHAT ARE SOME OF THE RELEVANT HISTORICAL CIRCUMSTANCES AS THEY RELATED TO LANGUAGE USAGE BY THOSE WHO WERE ENSLAVED? Slave Factory Linguistic Practices Atlantic Crossing Linguistic Practices Contact with Colonial Languages (Which countries?) Educational Relevance: Laws governing education and access to literacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Observations on the Foundation of Linguistics William Labov
    Some Observations on the Foundation of Linguistics 4/14/15, 6:55 AM Some Observations on the Foundation of Linguistics William Labov, University of Pennsylvania 1. Fundamental agreements and disagreements in linguistics, Linguistics is a relatively unified field of study, compared to many others. Over the course of the long history of linguistic analysis, dating from Indian grammarians in the 4th century B.C., we find emerging a high degree of consensus on the fundamental categories like sentence, phrase, noun, verb, vowel and consonant. There is also a wide range of agreement on fundamental principles, and the concepts of language structure enunciated by Saussure (1922) and Bloomfield (1933) in the early part of this century are introduced to students in all elementary texts. It is agreed that linguistics are not interested in a given corpus of linguistic data in itself, but rather in the rules, system and faculty of language that enable speakers to produce that corpus. It is agreed that that language is a system of abstract categories that are mutually defined by their oppositions; that sentences cannot be understood by combination of the meaning of words, but only through the progressive combination of smaller phrases to produce a tree-like structure of immediate constituents. At the same time, we can observe a profound division in the foundations of our discipline, that corresponds quite closely to the traditional philosophical opposition of idealism and materialism. (In the linguistic literature, this opposition is sometimes described as �mentalism� or �rationalism� vs. �empiricism�). The idealist approach is exemplified by generative grammar, as originated and developed by Chomsky (1957, 1965, 1981), and various other treatments that would account for the same data by parallel methods: generalized phrase structure grammar, lexical-functional grammar, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebonics and the Politics of English
    Ebonics and the Politics African-American students in Oakland’s schools. The resolution further declared of English Ebonics to be a language in its own right, not a dialect of English, and proclaimed Dennis Baron that students be taught in ways that would maintain Ebonics as well as introduce Abstract: them to standard English. In 1996 the Oakland Unified School The Oakland resolution and the District passed a resolution declaring responses to it that I shall explore in this Ebonics to be the primary language of the essay offer a lesson in language politics African-American students in its schools. and language pedagogy. Initially the The resolution further declared Ebonics Oakland resolution was received by the to be a language in its own right, not a American media, and the American dialect of English. In the face of massive public, as a declaration of linguistic national opposition to the Oakland independence, and as such it proved Ebonics resolution, this radical, separatist highly controversial. The media circus that move shifted to a conservative, instantly surrounded the Oakland assimilationist one: Oakland retracted its resolution continued for several weeks as declaration of linguistic independence and the School Board, its critics, and its reaffirmed the traditional pedagogical goal supporters tried to deal with the issues of of teaching students standard English. But language, pedagogy, and school success the Oakland Ebonics controversy reminds that the controversy raised. In the face of us that, although the English of former massive opposition, Oakland quickly British colonies has come into its own in retracted its declaration of linguistic the literary, cultural, and political scene, to independence and remodeled it into the point where we speak of World something more like a request for Englishes, the English varieties of what continued linguistic colonization.
    [Show full text]