DOCSLIB.ORG

Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Improved Generation Dispatch In Power Systems Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine t A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the diploma of Membership of Imperial College -by- Fergal McNamara Electrical Energy Systems Section Department of Electrical Engineering Imperial College August 1990 Page i Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems To my Mother and Father Page ii Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems ABSTRACT The economic allocation of generation among individual generating sets performed in an En­ ergy Management Centre relies on simple models of power plant behaviour. The plant is re­ garded as a power source which can be varied at will, with some maximum rate of change. However, there are many other relevant power station attributes, which, although clearly re­ cognized, are not explicitly taken in consideration in the Energy Management Centre. Primary control of grid frequency, achieved by governor action, relies on the fact that some generators are operating above the minimum pressure necessary to achieve their dispatched load. The response of such a generator to a frequency deviation from nominal, termed the governor gain, is an automatic control action aimed at reducing supply and demand imbal­ ance and hence containing frequency within limits. The ability of a generating unit to provide active power reserve for frequency regulation is a function of its dispatched load and operating pressure. If this relationship and the associated costs are known then the required reserve can be scheduled in the most economic way over the entire power system by an enhanced dispatch algorithm which includes the operating pressure. The nature of these relationships is examined in this thesis using plant models and tests and a system simulation is presented to test the advantages of the proposals by comparison with the original system. A method of trading reserve provision on thermal plant with other means such as pumped storage, gas turbines and combined cycle plant is discussed. The modes of operation are discussed and it is seen that worthwhile gains in system economics and per­ formance are possible. Page iii Abstract Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. R.M. Dunnett for his helpful comments, friendly advice and approachability which gave me confidence and encouragement during my research. I would also like to sincerely thank my group head Dr. J.F. Macqueen for his help and support in steering the project. I would like to express my appreciation to my academic supervisor Dr. M.J. Short and to Mr. E.D. Farmer for their help and comments. I am also indebted to the convenor of WG04 Mr. F.L. Carvalho for his counsel and advice and particularly for making available the opportunity to obtain the plant test data presented throughout this thesis. In addition, I am grateful to all my colleagues on WG04 for the stimu­ lating and lively workshop sessions and the feedback and comment obtained from Dr. F.J McDyer of ESB, Dipl.-lng. H. Kurten of KWU, Si. A. DeMarco of ENEL and Mr. P. Bodach of Ontorio Hydro. Acknowledgements are due for the help of Mr. T. Canning of ESB in performing some of the plant tests reported in this thesis and to Mr. D. O'Connor and Mr. A. Egan for many interesting meetings. A special mention is made of Mr. J. Corr of the North Wall Power Station for his useful suggestions. Similarly, I would like to thank Dr. B. Fox of QUB for his advice and guidance. Finally, my gratitude is shown to all the station staff who helped in performing the tests, my colleagues in the Power Systems Group at NGRDC and in the Electric Energy Systems Section at Imperial College ( who are too numerous to mention individually ) for providing a pleasant working environment. In particular, I would like to thank Mrs. H.M. Chandler for her indispensible assistance. This work was carried out at the National Grid Research and Development Centre and is published by permission of the National Grid Company pic. Page iv Acknowledgements Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems Table of Contents 1.0 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PLANT AND SYSTEM INTERFACE ............................................................................... 2 1.2.1. POWER PLANT CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................. 2 1.2.1.1 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM POWER ................................................................. 2 1.2.1.2 RATE OF CHANGE LIMITATIONS ..................................................................... 2 1.3 PLANT REPRESENTATION IN DISPATCH SYSTEMS .................................................... 2 1.3.1 OBJECTIVE FUNCTION ............................................................................................ 3 1.3.2 PLANT CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.2.1 COAL MILLS .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2.2 BOILER FEED PUMP ........................................................................................ 4 1.4 CURRENT DISPATCH PRACTICES ............................................................................... 5 1.4.1 U.K. SUPPLY SYSTEM ............................................................................................ 5 1.4.2 IRISH SUPPLY SYSTEM .......................................................................................... 5 1.4.3 ITALIAN SUPPLY SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 5 1.5 ACTIVE POWER RESERVE ............................................................................................ 6 1.5.1 ISLAND SYSTEMS .................................................................................................. 7 1.5.2 FREQUENCY REGULATION .................................................................................... 7 1.6 OVERVIEW OF THESIS .................................................................................................. 8 2.0 CHAPTER TWO - FREQUENCY REGULATION FROM THERMAL PLANT..................... 10 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 10 2.2 POWER PLANT MODELLING ...................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 MODEL EQUATIONS ............................................................................................ 11 2.2.1.1 EVAPORATOR ................................................................................................ 11 2.2.1.2 SUPERHEATER .............................................................................................. 13 2.2.1.3 REHEATER ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1.4 GENERATED POWER ...................................................................................... 13 2.2.1.5 COMBUSTION SYSTEM ................................................................................. 13 2.2.1.6 GOVERNOR VALVE MODEL ........................................................................... 13 2.2.2 SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 15 2.2.3 PARAMETERS AND SCALING ............................................................................. 16 2.2.4 VARIABLE BOUNDS .............................................................................................. 16 2.3 STATE VARIABLE REPRESENTATION ......................................................................... 17 2.4 STEADY STATES ......................................................................................................... 17 2.5 LINEARIZATION ........................................................................................................... 18 2.6 GOVERNOR GAIN ...................................................................................................... 20 2.7 STEP RESPONSE ......................................................................................................... 21 2.8 GAIN AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS ......................................................................... 22 2.9 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 23 3.0 CHAPTER THREE - ACTIVE POWER RESERVE PROVISION COSTS .............. 27 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 27 3.2 MODERN POWER STATION PLANT ........................................................................... 27 3.2.1 TURBINE PLANT .................................................................................................. 29 3.2.2 BOILER PLANT .................................................................................................... 29 3.2.3 METHODS OF GOVERNING .................................................................................. 31 3.2.4 THE DESIGN POINT .............................................................................................. 32 3.3 AERODYNAMICS AND THERMODYNAMICS ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012
    Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012 Production team: Iain MacLeay Kevin Harris Anwar Annut and chapter authors A National Statistics publication London: TSO © Crown Copyright 2012 All rights reserved First published 2012 ISBN 9780115155284 Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to Kevin Harris, at the address given in paragraph XXIX of the Introduction. The Department of Energy and Climate Change reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice. About TSO's Standing Order Service The Standing Order Service, open to all TSO account holders, allows customers to automatically receive the publications they require in a specified subject area, thereby saving them the time, trouble and expense of placing individual orders, also without handling charges normally incurred when placing ad-hoc orders. Customers may choose from over 4,000 classifications arranged in 250 sub groups under 30 major subject areas. These classifications enable customers to choose from a wide variety of subjects, those publications that are of special interest to them. This is a particularly valuable service for the specialist library or research body. All publications will be dispatched immediately after publication date. Write to TSO, Standing Order Department, PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN, quoting reference 12.01.013.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire
    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
    [Show full text]
  • FILE REFERENCE: PL16.227487 DEVELOPMENT: Erection of a 100
    FILE REFERENCE: PL16.227487 DEVELOPMENT: Erection of a 100 megawatt electricity power generating station designed to operate in combined heat and power (CHP) mode and all associated site works and services. LOCATION: Tawnaghmore Upper and Tawnaghmore Lower, Killala, County Mayo. APPLICATION Applicant: Mayo Power Limited. Planning Authority: Mayo County Council P.A. reference: P07/707 P.A. decision: To grant permission. APPEAL Appeal type: Third Party Appellants: 1. Killala Community Council 2. Michael O’Donnell 3. An Taisce 4. Asahi Development Committee INSPECTOR Öznur Yücel-Finn --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PL16.227487 An Bord Pleanala Page 1 of 86 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3. SITE AND LOCATIONAL CONTEXT 4. EIS 5. PLANNING AUTHORITY’S DECISION 6. PLANNING HISTORY 7. GROUNDS OF APPEAL • Killala Community Council • Michael O’Donnell • An Taisce • Asahi Development Committee 8. FIRST PARTY RESPONSE TO GROUNDS OF APPEAL 9. OBSERVATIONS • Peatland Council • An Taisce observations on other appeals • George and Robert Carroll • Friends of the Irish Environment • P.J. Mc Namara and others • North Mayo Peat Industrial Committee • Asahi Development Committee observations on other appeals 10. RELEVANT POLICIES AND GUIDELINES 11. COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROVISIONS 12. ASSESSMENT 13. RECOMMENDATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PL16.227487 An Bord Pleanala Page 2 of 86 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is a third party appeal against the decision of Mayo County Council to grant permission for a development of 100 megawatt electricity power station designed to operate in combined heat and power (CHP) mode. The application is accompanied by an EIS (it is below the threshold of 300MW where one would be mandatory). The proposed power station would be subject to an IPPC Licence and would be required to obtain a GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Permit from the EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Regional Assembly Draft Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy
    Southern Regional Assembly Draft Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy Gas Networks Ireland Response 8th March 2019 Introduction Gas Networks Ireland (GNI) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the consultation on the Draft Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy issued by the Southern Regional Assembly. GNI is a fully owned subsidiary of Ervia (formally known as Bord Gáis Éireann). It owns, operates, builds and maintains the gas network in Ireland and ensures the safe and reliable delivery of gas to its customers. The company transports natural gas through a 14,172km pipeline network. This supplies energy to over 688,000 customers, including businesses, domestic users and power stations. GNI believes that the gas network is integral to Ireland’s energy system and future. GNI is driving environmental change for the benefit of all the citizens of Ireland through its development of CNG1 infrastructure for gas in transport, and renewable gas2 injection infrastructure. GNI is supportive of the Draft Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy for the Southern Region, and would like to take this opportunity to highlight sections of the strategy where the gas network and the decarbonisation initiatives being carried out by GNI could be included and/or considered. Draft Policy – Section GNI Comment Section 5: Environment; - Renewable gas, produced through anaerobic digestion (AD) can reduce carbon emissions, provide income and employment to rural communities and displace natural gas to reduce overall emissions. GNI suggests wording supporting AD is added to the strategy document. - Provide policy support to the Agricultural sector to develop AD, and to GNI as the provider of renewable gas injection infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents DCCAE Updated Retrofitting Note 25/05/20 [GP]
    DCCAE Briefing for PfG Talks submitted to D/oT Contents DCCAE Updated Retrofitting note 25/05/20 [GP] ................................................................................. 2 DCCAE Briefing 22/05/20 [GP] ............................................................................................................. 2 DCCAE Residential Retrofit 18/05/20 [gp] ............................................................................................ 7 Moneypoint Power Plant Note 18/05/20 [gp] ....................................................................................... 10 Responses to Questions from Sinn Fein 06/05/20 [SF] ........................................................................ 10 DCCAE Response to Green Party Filling Station Query 10/03/20 [GP] .............................................. 14 DCCAE Responses to questions Green Party 09/03/20 [GP] [FF] ....................................................... 15 DCCAE and DCHG note on rewetting bogs 09/03/20 [GP SF] ........................................................... 18 DCCAE Response on Climate 09/03/20 [FF] 28/02/20 [SF] ................................................................ 20 DCCAE Peat Regulations Note 04/03/20 [FG] .................................................................................... 24 DCCAE Responses to Green Party Questions 27/02/20 [GP] .............................................................. 27 DCCAE Clarification on query 21/02/20 [SF] ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Review and Update of the Limerick 2030 Plan Ce
    Interim Review and Update of the Limerick 2030 Plan Ce Prepared for Limerick City and County Council 26 June 2021 © 2021 KPMG, an Irish partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by 0 guarantee. All rights reserved. Disclaimer If you are a party other than Limerick City and County Council: KPMG owes you no duty (whether in contract or in tort or under statute or otherwise) with respect to or in connection with the attached report or any part thereof; and will have no liability to you for any loss or damage suffered or costs incurred by you or any other person arising out of or in connection with the provision to you of the attached report or any part thereof, however the loss or damage is caused, including, but not limited to, as a result of negligence. If you are a party other than the Limerick City and County Council and you choose to rely upon the attached report or any part thereof, you do so entirely at your own risk. This document is an initial draft report. Our final report and any other deliverables will take precedence over this document. © 2021 KPMG, an Irish partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by 1 guarantee. All rights reserved. Introduction 2 Contents The contacts at KPMG in connection Page with this report are: Introduction 2 Executive summary 8 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Information Report Section 36 Consent Variation
    ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT SECTION 36 CONSENT VARIATION DAMHEAD CREEK 2 POWER STATION Name Job Title Signature Date Environmental John Bacon / Consultant / February Prepared Associate Director, 2016 Andrew Hepworth Aecom Technical Technical Director, February Kerry Whalley Review Aecom 2016 February Approved Richard Lowe Director, Aecom 2016 AMENDMENT RECORD Issue Date Issued Date Effective Purpose of Issue and Description of Amendment 1.0 January 2016 January 2016 S36 Variation Draft EIR for review 2.0 February 2016 February 2016 S36 Variation Final for Issue DHC2 Environmental Information Report 4-Feb-16 Page 2 of 116 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Purpose of this Document 10 1.2 Planning history of DHC2 10 1.3 Environmental Assessment 11 2. Description of the Development 15 2.1 Proposed Development 15 2.2 Site Location 16 2.3 Application Site Context 17 2.4 Main Buildings and Plant 18 2.5 Process Description 19 2.6 Operational Information 21 2.7 Environmental Permit 22 2.8 Combined Heat and Power (CHP) 23 3. Legislative Framework 26 4. Status of Pre Commencement Planning Conditions 27 4.1 Operational Noise 27 4.2 Contamination of Watercourses 27 4.3 Ecological Enhancement and Protected Species 27 4.4 Ground Contamination 28 4.5 Landscaping and Creative Conservation 28 4.6 Archaeology 29 4.7 Layout and Design 29 4.8 Green Travel Plan 29 4.9 Construction and Construction Traffic 30 4.8 Other Planning Conditions 30 4.8 Other Planning Consents 30 5. Stakeholder Consultation 31 6. Environmental Appraisal 33 6.1 Methodology 33 6.2 Air Quality 35 6.3 Noise and Vibration 42 6.4 Landscape and Visual Amenity 48 6.5 Ecology 61 6.6 Water Quality 75 6.7 Geology, Hydrology and Land Contamination 82 6.8 Traffic and Infrastructure 93 6.9 Cultural Heritage 98 6.10 Socio-Economics 104 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 5A Planning Applications
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR 2 JANUARY 2008 Page no. 1 MC2007/0014 Peninsula Application for deemed planning permission under Section 90(2) of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for construction of two advanced supercritical (ASC) coal-fired generating units (demolition of power station) Kingsnorth Power Station, Kingsnorth, Hoo St. Werburgh, Rochester, Kent 3 2 MC2007/1517 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into 2 separate and independent retail units and sale of non DIY goods. B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 7 3 MC2007/1912 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into a separate retail unit, provision of mezzanine to provide 1417sqm additional floorspace and sale of non DIY goods B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 76 4 MC2005/0814 Luton & Wayfield Application for approval of reserved matters pursuant to condition 1 of MC2003/1285 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of three blocks of flats comprising of 96 residential units, associated garaging and landscaping 2 Ash Tree Lane Chatham Kent ME5 7BZ 87 5 MC2005/1707 Twydall Retrospective application for the construction of fire escape route and retaining wall Units A to E Invicta Business Centre, land adjoining Beechings Way, Gillingham, Kent. 90 6 MC2007/0265 Rainham Central Construction of a block of lock up garages Land between 21 and 23 Asquith Road Rainham Gillingham Kent 96 7 MC2007/1372 Strood Rural Proposed height increase of 14.3 metre high monopole by 2.5 metres to
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Merger Notification M/20/005 – Esb/Coillte (Jv)
    I DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/20/005 – ESB/COILLTE (JV) Dated 5 February 2021 Contents Contents ........................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 The Proposed Transaction ...................................................................................... 4 The Undertakings Involved ..................................................................................... 4 ESB ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Coillte ....................................................................................................................................... 6 The Joint Venture ..................................................................................................................... 7 Rationale for the Proposed Transaction .................................................................. 8 Preliminary Investigation (“Phase 1”) ..................................................................... 8 Contact with the Undertakings Involved ................................................................................. 8 Third Party Submissions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uniper UK Limited (Formerly E.ON UK) Have Not Undertaken Any Operations in Zone 5 Since the Environmental Permit Was Issued
    Application SCR evaluation template Name of activity, address and NGR Kingsnorth Power Station Hoo PO Box 15 Rochester Kent ME3 9LD Centre of the site is at NG Ref. TQ 8115 7203 Document reference of application SCR Partial Surrender Application for Kingsnorth Power Station 09/12/2019 Ground Investigation Interpretative Report Kingsnorth Power Station On Behalf of E.ON UK Limited Date: May 2014 Ref: JER5486 JER5981 RPS Validation report for Coal Stock 131017 Date and version of application SCR N/A 1.0 Site details Has the applicant provided the following information as required by the application SCR template? Site plans showing site layout, drainage, surfacing, receptors, sources of emissions/releases and monitoring points NA. This is an application for Surrender 2.0 Condition of the land at permit issue To be completed by GWCL officers (Receptor) Has the applicant provided the following information as required by the application SCR template? a) Environmental setting including geology, hydrogeology and surface waters b) Pollution history including: pollution incidents that may have affected land historical land-uses and associated contaminants visual/olfactory evidence of existing contamination evidence of damage to existing pollution prevention measures c) Evidence of historic contamination (i.e. historical site investigation, assessment, remediation and verification reports (where available) d) Has the applicant chosen to collect baseline reference data? Condition of Land at the Point of Permit Issue The environmental setting is
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs
    Waste & Minerals Development Framework Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs Final October 2011 Prepared for East Sussex County Council/ Brighton and Hove City Council East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Revision Schedule Hazardous Waste – Study into Future Management Needs October 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 06/06/2011 Initial Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 02 22/06/2011 Final Draft Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 03 29/09/2011 Final Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate URS/Scott Wilson 12 Regan Way Chetwynd Business Park Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6RZ Tel 0115 9077000 Fax 0115 9077001 East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of East Sussex County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed [Proposal Dated 14 April 2011]. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson.. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report.
    [Show full text]