DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Waste & Minerals Development Framework Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs Final October 2011 Prepared for East Sussex County Council/ Brighton and Hove City Council East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Revision Schedule Hazardous Waste – Study into Future Management Needs October 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 06/06/2011 Initial Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 02 22/06/2011 Final Draft Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 03 29/09/2011 Final Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate URS/Scott Wilson 12 Regan Way Chetwynd Business Park Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6RZ Tel 0115 9077000 Fax 0115 9077001 East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of East Sussex County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed [Proposal Dated 14 April 2011]. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson.. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between April 2011 and October 2011 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS Scott Wilson disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS Scott Wilson’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS Scott Wilson specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant changes. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of URS Scott Wilson Ltd. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Study Background ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Study Aims ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Report Outline .................................................................................................................. 3 2 Legislative, Policy and Other Drivers............................................. 5 2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Legislative Framework ..................................................................................................... 5 2.3 National Waste Strategy................................................................................................... 7 2.4 National Waste Review .................................................................................................... 8 2.5 National Hazardous Waste Strategy ................................................................................ 8 2.6 Regional and Local Strategy ............................................................................................ 9 2.7 Data Sources.................................................................................................................. 12 2.8 Economic Drivers ........................................................................................................... 12 2.9 Other Drivers .................................................................................................................. 13 3 Study Methodology ........................................................................ 14 3.1 Data Sources.................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Waste Definitions ........................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Management Facility Definitions .................................................................................... 16 3.4 Waste Management/Disposal Definitions (‘Fates’)......................................................... 18 3.5 Data Collection and Review ........................................................................................... 19 3.6 Growth and Capacity Modelling ..................................................................................... 19 3.7 Final Reporting ............................................................................................................... 20 4 Hazardous Waste Production........................................................ 21 4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 National and South East Hazardous Waste Production................................................. 21 4.3 East Sussex and Brighton and Hove.............................................................................. 22 4.4 Growth Predictions ......................................................................................................... 26 5 Hazardous Waste Management..................................................... 30 5.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 30 5.2 National and South East Hazardous Waste Management ............................................. 30 5.3 Hazardous Waste Management in East Sussex and Brighton & Hove.......................... 32 5.4 Future Capacity Needs................................................................................................... 42 6 Policy Considerations.................................................................... 57 East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework 6.1 Principles of Future Waste Management Requirements................................................ 57 6.2 Treatment Technology Considerations .......................................................................... 59 7 Discussion of Results.................................................................... 64 7.1 Data Availability.............................................................................................................. 64 7.2 External Drivers.............................................................................................................. 64 7.3 Capacity Implications ..................................................................................................... 65 7.4 Policy Considerations..................................................................................................... 65 8 Conclusions.................................................................................... 70 8.1 Current Treatment and Disposal Capacity ..................................................................... 70 8.2 Policy Considerations..................................................................................................... 70 8.3 Future Capacity Requirements....................................................................................... 71 8.4 Study Updates................................................................................................................ 72 Appendix A Glossary............................................................................. 73 Appendix B Waste Management Definitions ....................................... 76 Appendix C Historic Hazardous Waste Production ............................. 80 Appendix D Detailed Analysis of 2007 Top Eight EWC Codes ........... 85 Appendix E Growth Predictions ......................................................... 106 Appendix F List of Sites .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire

    Peat Database Results Hampshire

    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System

    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System

    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
  • Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine

    Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine

    Improved Generation Dispatch In Power Systems Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine t A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the diploma of Membership of Imperial College -by- Fergal McNamara Electrical Energy Systems Section Department of Electrical Engineering Imperial College August 1990 Page i Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems To my Mother and Father Page ii Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems ABSTRACT The economic allocation of generation among individual generating sets performed in an En­ ergy Management Centre relies on simple models of power plant behaviour. The plant is re­ garded as a power source which can be varied at will, with some maximum rate of change. However, there are many other relevant power station attributes, which, although clearly re­ cognized, are not explicitly taken in consideration in the Energy Management Centre. Primary control of grid frequency, achieved by governor action, relies on the fact that some generators are operating above the minimum pressure necessary to achieve their dispatched load. The response of such a generator to a frequency deviation from nominal, termed the governor gain, is an automatic control action aimed at reducing supply and demand imbal­ ance and hence containing frequency within limits. The ability of a generating unit to provide active power reserve for frequency regulation is a function of its dispatched load and operating pressure. If this relationship and the associated costs are known then the required reserve can be scheduled in the most economic way over the entire power system by an enhanced dispatch algorithm which includes the operating pressure.
  • Land Adjacent to Fawley Power Station, Fawley

    Land Adjacent to Fawley Power Station, Fawley

    Planning Committee - 28 July 2020 Report Item 1 Application No: 19/00365/OUT Outline Planning Permission Site: Land Adjacent to Fawley Power Station, Fawley Proposal: Outline application for land within the New Forest National Park Authority comprising the removal of structures on the quarry site and provision of 120 new homes, 1000 square metres of new civic space including provision for Early Years Learning (Use Class D1), 200 square metres of drinking establishments (Use Class A4), a two form entry primary school, flood defences / sea wall, public open space and habitat enhancement of existing land, hard and soft landscaping, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace, a saline lagoon, tidal creek, reconfiguration of the existing access and creation of a new access from the B3053 and access road through the site, associated infrastructure and engineering works (access to be considered) (AMENDED DESCRIPTION AND AMENDED PLANS). Applicant: Fawley Waterside Ltd Case Officer: Natalie Walter Parish: FAWLEY SUMMARY This is an outline planning application with all detailed matters (layout, scale, appearance and landscaping) reserved for subsequent approval. The only matter of detail to be considered at this time is the means of access. The application is though accompanied by very detailed supporting documents that include an Environmental Statement, Parameter Plans and a Design Code that subsequent reserved matters’ applications must adhere to. Submitted in May last year, the application has been the subject of extensive discussions and negotiations with the applicant and statutory consultees, both prior to and following submission. The principle of the proposed development has been established through the site-specific allocation in the Authority’s recently adopted Local Plan (Policy SP26).
  • Fawley Power Station Major Development Test Topic Paper

    Fawley Power Station Major Development Test Topic Paper

    Proposals for land adjacent to Fawley Power Station National Parks Major Development Test – Background Paper (May 2018) 1. National Planning Policy and Guidance – Background 1.1 Since 1949 national planning policy has included coverage of major development affecting National Parks. Originally known as the ‘Silkin Test’, the precise wording of the major development test has been amended over time and the current wording is set out in paragraph 116 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2012). This paragraph of the NPPF states: Planning permission should be refused for major developments in these designated areas except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated they are in the public interest. Consideration of such applications should include an assessment of: . the need for the development, including in terms of any national considerations, and the impact of permitting it, or refusing it, upon the local economy; . the cost of, and scope for, developing elsewhere outside the designated area, or meeting the need for it in some other way; and . any detrimental effect on the environment, the landscape and recreational opportunities, and the extent to which that could be moderated. 1.2 The major development test is also referred to within the Government’s online National Planning Practice Guidance resource (NPPG) which states: Planning permission should be refused for major development in a National Park, the Broads or an AONB except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated to be in the public interest. Whether a proposed development in these designated areas should be treated as a major development, to which the policy in paragraph 116 of the Framework applies, will be a matter for the relevant decision taker, taking into account the proposal in question and the local context.
  • T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 Auction Monitor Report STC1

    T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 Auction Monitor Report STC1

    Deloitte LLP T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 Athene Place 66 Shoe Lane London EC4A 3BQ Phone: +44 (0)20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7583 1198 www.deloitte.co.uk Direct phone: +44 20 7303 8204 [email protected] T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 Auction Monitor Report Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 2 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. 12 December 2016 Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, whose member firms are legally separate and independent entities. Please see www.deloitte.co.uk/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms. © 2016 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 Contents 1 Assurance Report 1 2 Background and Context 3 3 Confirmation of the list of Bidders to be awarded Capacity Agreements 5 4 Appendix A – In-scope Capacity Market Rules (Chapter 5) 21 5 Appendix B – Outline of Work Performed 22 2 T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2016 1 Assurance Report ISAE 3000 Independent Assurance Report on Compliance of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (NGET) (as Electricity Market Reform Delivery Body) with selected requirements of the Capacity Market Rules, Regulations and the Auction Guidelines. 1.1 Scope We have performed assurance work over the extent to which the Delivery Body (“DB”) has complied with the requirements of Chapter 5 of the Capacity Market Rules, Regulations and the Auction Guidelines (together the “Rules and Guidelines”) as at 15 November 2016 .
  • A Look Beyond OJEU Titles. How Do Awarding Authorities Begin to Describe Public Contracts? Page 1 of 242

    A Look Beyond OJEU Titles. How Do Awarding Authorities Begin to Describe Public Contracts? Page 1 of 242

    2005 Report (Jan-Mar). A look beyond OJEU Titles. How do Awarding Authorities begin to describe Public Contracts? Page 1 of 242 A New Tool for Marketing Serial For Reader's Use An introduction to past OJEU Public Contracts - All Sectors 1 25-seater bus bodies 4 Microscopes to be used in ENT Outpatient area; 1 Microscope to be used in ENT Operating 2 Theatres Microscopes 3 4x4 4,5 T Tipper 57/62-seater bus chassis for delivery to Education and Library Boards as and when required during the 4 period of the contract 70-seater coaches with coach-style and lap and diagonal seat belts based on standard PSV coach 5 chassis are required for use on mainsstream and other school routes including trips, excursions and holidays A 2-year enabling arrangement (framework agreement) with a 1-year option to supply various 6 uniforms A 600 MHz NMR spectrometer with shielded wide-bore magnet for use in general, biological, high- 7 resolution solid state and imaging situations A call-off contract to provide consultancy to assist RAS to establish the means for proper control of radioactive substances, the safe disposal of radioactive waste, the policy on radioactivity in the 8 environment, the coordination of the UK Government's response to overseas nuclear accidents and to the recovery phase of terrorist acts using Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear (CBRN) containments 9 A clean room facility is required on behalf of the Tissue Engineering research facility 10 A complete refrigerator system is required for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE) Report by OJEU Reporter Ltd Enquiries Welcome To send e-mail please visit www.ojeu.com 2005 Report (Jan-Mar).
  • Fawley Waterside Access and Nature Conservation Plan

    Fawley Waterside Access and Nature Conservation Plan

    Fawley Waterside Access and Nature Conservation Plan Jonathan Cox V3 23rd May 2018 Fawley Waterside Access and Nature Conservation Plan Fawley Waterside Access and Nature Conservation Plan Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Bird use of the Solent coast ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Disturbance to the New Forest ......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Recreation mitigation land and nature conservation management ................................................. 4 1.4 Recreation mitigation plan ................................................................................................................ 5 2 Suitable Accessible Natural Greenspace (SANG) provision ....................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Exxon Laydown SANG ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Fawley SANG .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.3 Tom Tiddlers SANG .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Wildlife habitats within SANG ........................................................................................................
  • Powering the Solent: Heat and Power Strategy and Action

    Powering the Solent: Heat and Power Strategy and Action

    Draft Report Jo POWERING THE SOLENT Solent Heat and Power Strategy and Action Plan to 2050 JANUARY 2019 Prepared by: Carbon Trust Advisory Ltd Prepared for: Solent LEP 1 Carbon Trust prepared this report based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources. Carbon Trust is an organisation of independent experts with the mission to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. We operate at a world-wide level and we have offices in London, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Belfast, Beijing, Pretoria, and Mexico City, as well as a presence in São Paulo and Washington DC This final report was prepared by the Carbon Trust for the Solent Local Enterprise Partnership. Emma Ashcroft Manager, The Carbon Trust [email protected] Micol Salmeri Associate, The Carbon Trust Micol [email protected] Rob Franklin Analyst, The Carbon Trust [email protected] Hector Wilson Analyst, The Carbon Trust Hector [email protected] Charlie McNelly Analyst, The Carbon Trust [email protected] Reviewed by: Paul Huggins Director, The Carbon Trust [email protected] 2 Environmental sensitivity ......................... 18 Table of Contents Energy ............................................................. 18 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................... 5 Generation ......................................................... 18 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 7 Consumption ..................................................... 21 Project Scope and Methodology .................
  • NFDC AQAP 2008 Fawley.Pdf

    NFDC AQAP 2008 Fawley.Pdf

    2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document is the draft Action Plan for Fawley. The Action Plan has been produced following the review and assessment of air quality in the New Forest. This process determined the likely exceedance of the 15 minute mean objective for sulphur dioxide in Fawley village. As a result New Forest District Council had a duty to declare an Air Quality Management Area in Fawley and prepare an Action Plan. The main aim of the Action Plan is to present options which, if implemented, should reduce short term sulphur dioxide concentrations in pursuit of the sulphur dioxide 15 minute mean objective. The Action Plan confirms the likely source of sulphur dioxide is from local industrial sources. Options discussed range from industrial schemes, which are mainly based on the new permit for Esso Petroleum Ltd., to formalising the relationships between industry, the regulator (the Environment Agency), New Forest District Council and the public. The Action Plan has been put out to consultation to all interested parties, and a summary of comments received has been included in the Action Plan. It is acknowledged that the Action Plan is a continuously evolving document involving numerous groups and Authorities which may require revision in the future. 3 4 CONTENTS Executive Summary . page 3 1.0 Introduction . page 6 1.1 Local Air Quality Management . page 6 1.2 The Review and Assessment Process . page 8 1.3 Aims of the Air Quality Action Plan . page 10 2.0 Review and Assessment of Air Quality in Fawley . page 11 2.1 Fawley. page 11 2.2 Review and Assessment Process for Fawley.
  • Cooling Water Options for the New Generation of Nuclear Power Stations in the UK

    Cooling Water Options for the New Generation of Nuclear Power Stations in the UK

    Cooling Water Options for the New Generation of Nuclear Power Stations in the UK SC070015/SR3 The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned and funded by the Environment Agency. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Turnpenny, A.W.H., Coughlan, J., Ng, B., Crews, P., Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Bamber, R.N., Rowles, P. Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 www.environment-agency.gov.uk Dissemination Status: Released to all regions ISBN: 978-1-84911-192-8 Publicly available © Environment Agency June 2010 Keywords: Nuclear, cooling water, entrainment, impingement, All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced thermal with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Research Contractor: The views and statements expressed in this report are Jacobs Engineering Ltd those of the author alone. The views or statements Kenneth Dibben House expressed in this publication do not necessarily Enterprise Road represent the views of the Environment Agency and the Chilworth Science Park Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for Southampton such views or statements. SO16 7NS UK This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally Tel.: +44(0)2380 893 513 chlorine free.
  • Duurzaamheid in De Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector

    Duurzaamheid in De Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector

    Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector SOMO Februari 2012 Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector Colofon Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector Februari 2012 Auteurs: Tim Steinweg, Joseph Wilde-Ramsing, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz Layout design: Annelies Vlasblom ISBN: 978-90-71284-94-6 Deze publicatie is tot stand gekomen in opdracht van de Consumentenbond en Greenpeace Nederland. De inhoud van deze publicatie is de verantwoordelijkheid van SOMO. Gepubliceerd door: Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. Over SOMO SOMO is een onafhankelijke not-for-profit onderzoeks- en netwerkorganisatie. SOMO richt zich op duurzame ontwikkeling, zowel sociaal, ecologisch als economisch. Sinds 1973 onderzoekt SOMO multinationale ondernemingen en de gevolgen van hun activiteiten voor mens en milieu wereldwijd. SOMO ondersteunt maatschappelijke organisaties door trainingen, coördinatie van netwerken en kennisopbouw over multinationale ondernemingen in hun internationale context van productie, handel, financiering en regelgeving. 1 Inhoudsopgave Figuren ............................................................................................................................ 5 Tabellen ..........................................................................................................................