DOCSLIB.ORG

Duurzaamheid in De Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Duurzaamheid in De Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector SOMO Februari 2012 Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector Colofon Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector Februari 2012 Auteurs: Tim Steinweg, Joseph Wilde-Ramsing, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz Layout design: Annelies Vlasblom ISBN: 978-90-71284-94-6 Deze publicatie is tot stand gekomen in opdracht van de Consumentenbond en Greenpeace Nederland. De inhoud van deze publicatie is de verantwoordelijkheid van SOMO. Gepubliceerd door: Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. Over SOMO SOMO is een onafhankelijke not-for-profit onderzoeks- en netwerkorganisatie. SOMO richt zich op duurzame ontwikkeling, zowel sociaal, ecologisch als economisch. Sinds 1973 onderzoekt SOMO multinationale ondernemingen en de gevolgen van hun activiteiten voor mens en milieu wereldwijd. SOMO ondersteunt maatschappelijke organisaties door trainingen, coördinatie van netwerken en kennisopbouw over multinationale ondernemingen in hun internationale context van productie, handel, financiering en regelgeving. 1 Inhoudsopgave Figuren ............................................................................................................................ 5 Tabellen ........................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introductie ....................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Doel en context van dit rapport ......................................................................... 8 1.2 Methodologische opmerkingen ......................................................................... 9 1.3 Opzet van het rapport ....................................................................................... 12 1.4 Over SOMO ...................................................................................................... 13 2 Anode Energie ................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 14 2.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 15 2.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en in planfase ..................................................... 16 3 Atoomstroom .................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 17 3.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 17 3.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 17 3.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en planfase ......................................................... 18 4 Delta ................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 19 4.2 Huidige opwekkingscapaciteit ........................................................................... 19 4.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 20 4.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw ............................................................................. 21 4.5 Extra capaciteit: in planfase .............................................................................. 22 5 DGB Energie .................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 23 5.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 23 5.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 23 5.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en in planfase ..................................................... 24 6 Dong Energy .................................................................................................... 25 6.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 25 6.2 Huidige opwekkingscapaciteit en opgewekte stroom ....................................... 25 6.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 27 6.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw ............................................................................. 28 6.5 Extra capaciteit: in planfase .............................................................................. 29 7 E.ON ................................................................................................................. 30 7.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 30 7.2 Huidige opwekkingscapaciteit ........................................................................... 30 7.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 32 7.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw ............................................................................. 33 7.5 Extra capaciteit: in planfase .............................................................................. 34 8 Eneco ............................................................................................................... 37 8.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 37 8.2 Huidige opwekkingscapaciteit ........................................................................... 37 8.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 39 2 Duurzaamheid in de Nederlandse Elektriciteitssector 8.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw ............................................................................. 40 8.5 Extra capaciteit: in planfase .............................................................................. 41 9 Energiedirect.nl ............................................................................................... 43 9.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 43 9.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 43 9.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 43 9.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en in planfase ..................................................... 44 10 Frivius .............................................................................................................. 45 10.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 45 10.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 45 10.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 45 10.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en in planfase ..................................................... 46 11 GDF Suez/Electrabel ....................................................................................... 47 11.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 47 11.2 Huidige opwekkingscapaciteit ........................................................................... 47 11.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 49 11.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw ............................................................................. 50 11.5 Extra capaciteit: in planfase .............................................................................. 51 12 Greenchoice .................................................................................................... 54 12.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 54 12.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 54 12.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland ........................................................................ 55 12.4 Extra capaciteit: in aanbouw en in planfase ..................................................... 56 13 Innova Energie ................................................................................................ 57 13.1 Korte omschrijving ............................................................................................ 57 13.2 Ingekochte stroom ............................................................................................ 57 13.3 Geleverde stroom in Nederland .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OFFSHORE RENEWABLES - Wind, Wave and Tidal Energy Sustainable Decisions Selected DHI Project References - from Planning to Construction
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES - wind, wave and tidal energy Sustainable decisions Selected DHI project references - from planning to construction SustainableDHI planning, is an international, design and independent construction consulting require informed and research organisation Environmental impact assessment – decisions.advancing DHI offers technological highly specialised development environmental and competence monitoring in the fieldshydrography, of biology, wildlife and modellingwater, technology.environment and health. We have contributed to the development Dredging scheme optimisation of offshore wind farms and marine renewable energy installations Onlineworldwide monitoring for more than 25 years. Operational forecasts – metocean, sediment plumes © Design conditions Photo: Bent Medvind OFFSHORE RENEWABLES WIND, WAVE AND TIDAL ENERGY Selected DHI Project References Project Client Year Q10 Offshore Wind Farm, the Netherlands. Monitoring of ENECO, the Netherlands 2013-2018 seabirds on the Dutch continental shelf. Amrumbank West Offshore Wind Farm, Germany. E.ON Kraftwerke GmbH, 2013-2016 Monitoring of waves and currents during installation of Germany foundations and turbines. Kriegers Flak Offshore Wind Farm, Denmark. Baseline Niras A/S, Denmark on 2013-2014 investigations and environmental impact assessments behalf of Energinet.dk, (EIA) of marine mammals and birds. Denmark Three coastal offshore wind farms in Danish waters, Rambøll, Denmark on behalf 2013-2014 Denmark. Baseline and impacts assessments on birds of Energinet.dk, Denmark and marine mammals involving aerial surveys, telemetry, radar and acoustic investigation. Coastal offshore wind farms in Danish waters, Denmark. Energinet.dk, Denmark 2013-2014 Online measurements of metocean paramaters at four different development sites. MISTRAL and Provence Grand Large Floating Offshore EDF energies nouvelles, 2013 Wind Farms (Mediterranean Sea), France. France Morphological study and definition of reference seabed level at both sites and along cable corridors including landfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire
    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
    [Show full text]
  • RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf
    geschäFtsbericht 2011 finanzKalenDer 2012 /2013 2011 geschäftsbericht eCKDaten 2011 auf einen bliCK. RWE • Hohe Ergebnisbelastung durch beschleunigten Kernenergieausstieg in Deutschland 19. April 2012 Hauptversammlung • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 5,8 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2,00 € je Aktie 20. April 2012 Dividendenzahlung • Erste Maßnahmen zur Stärkung der Finanzkraft umgesetzt • Prognose 2012: Betriebliches Ergebnis trotz Desinvestitionen auf Vorjahreshöhe 10. Mai 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2012 RWE-Konzern 2011 2010 + /− in % 14. August 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2012 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 294,6 311,2 − 5,3 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 322,2 395,4 − 18,5 14. November 2012 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2012 Außenumsatz Mio. € 51.686 53.320 − 3,1 EBITDA Mio. € 8.460 10.256 − 17,5 5. März 2013 Bericht über das Geschäftsjahr 2012 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 5.814 7.681 − 24,3 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 3.024 4.978 − 39,3 18. April 2013 Hauptversammlung Nettoergebnis /Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.806 3.308 − 45,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.479 3.752 − 33,9 19. April 2013 Dividendenzahlung Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 10,9 14,4 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 8,5 9,0 - 15. Mai 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2013 Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.286 2.876 − 55,3 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.279 53.386 − 0,2 14. August 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2013 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.510 5.500 0,2 Investitionen Mio. € 7.072 6.643 6,5 14. November 2013 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2013 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Statements 2012 RWE Innogy Gmbh
    Management Report of RWE Innogy GmbH for the Period Ended 31 December 2012 Review of Operations 1. Business and economic environment 1.1. Object of the company and positioning within the RWE Group's structure RWE Innogy GmbH ("RWE Innogy" or "Company") is a subsidiary wholly owned by RWE Aktiengesellschaft (RWE AG) which pools the expertise of the RWE Group's power plants in the field of renewables. To this end, the Company holds approximately 60 investments in Germany, the rest of Europe and the USA, in particular including RWE Innogy Windpower Hannover GmbH (Germany), RWE Innogy (UK) Ltd. (UK), RWE Renewables Polska Sp. z o.o. (Poland), RWE Innogy Italia S.p.A. (Italy), Georgia Biomass Holding LLC (USA) and RWE Innogy AERSA S.A.U. (Spain), which operate as management companies in their respective countries. In order to achieve the prescribed goal of increasing the share of the RWE Group's electricity generation capacity accounted for by renewables, RWE Innogy and its joint ventures plan, build and operate plants which produce electricity primarily from renewables in Germany and the rest of Europe. One of the focal points of these activities are onshore and offshore wind farm projects. However, the Company is also active in the fields of hydroelectric power and biomass. Furthermore, it provides assistance in developing forward-looking technologies. For instance, RWE Innogy plans and operates biogas facilities as well as solar power stations either directly or via its joint ventures while providing support to innovative enterprises in their startup and growth phases via a venture capital firm.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Intermodal Park SCOPING OPINION
    East Midlands Intermodal Park SCOPING OPINION September 2014 Scoping Opinion for the East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 4 3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ..................................... 11 4.0 OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................ 23 APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF CONSULTEES APPENDIX 2 – RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION AND COPIES OF REPLIES APPENDIX 3 – PRESENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Scoping Opinion for the East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the Scoping Opinion (the Opinion) provided by the Secretary of State in respect of the content of the Environmental Statement for the Proposed East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI). This report sets out the Secretary of State’s opinion on the basis of the information provided in Goodman Shepherd (UK) Limited’s (‘the applicant’) report entitled ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report’ (August 2014) (‘the Scoping Report’). The Opinion can only reflect the proposals as currently described by the applicant. The Secretary of State has consulted on the Scoping Report and the responses received have been taken into account in adopting this Opinion. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the topic areas identified in the Scoping Report encompass those
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham-Derby Green Belt Review
    Nottingham-Derby Green Belt Review Lynette Hughes Nottinghamshire County Council and Steve Buffery Derbyshire County Council 24 August 2006 This is an information and discussion paper. It is the work of officers and has not been formally considered by any authority. It therefore does not represent the views of any authority or other body. Comments on the paper are welcome and can be forwarded to [email protected] or [email protected]. Executive Summary Page 1 of 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The review comprises: 1. The working paper drafted in March 2006 and finalised in April 2006 2. The assessment paper drafted in July 2006 and finalised in August 2006 3. The implications paper produced in August 2006 The review is the work of officers and has not been formally considered by any authority. The findings of the review have been considered in the formulation of the draft 3 Cities SRS and the draft Northern SRS which will form part of the Regional Plan to be published on 28 September 2006 and tested at a public examination in 2007. A project plan produced and agreed in December 2005 and added to in April 2006 have guided the review work. The review has started from the point that the principle of the green belt is well established and will remain. However, the review is related to the needs of development in the areas where there is green belt at present. General areas for possible extensions to the green belt have also been considered. The government's sustainable communities plan requires that the current area of green belt land within each region should be maintained or increased.
    [Show full text]
  • 29Th July Agenda Prelim
    REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES SECTION 1: Planning Applications SECTION 2: Appeals In accordance with the provisions of Section 100D of the Local Government Act 1972, BACKGROUND PAPERS are the contents of the files whose registration numbers are quoted at the head of each report, but this does not include material which is confidential or exempt (as defined in Sections 100A and D of that Act, respectively). -------------------------------- 1. PLANNING APPLICATIONS This section includes reports on applications for: approvals of reserved matters, listed building consent, work to trees in tree preservation orders and conservation areas, conservation area consent, hedgerows work, advertisement consent, notices for permitted development under the General Permitted Development Order 1995 (as amended) and responses to County Matters. Reference Item Place Ward Page 9/2009/0951 1.1 Shardlow Aston 1 9/2009/1067 1.2 Willington Willington/Findern 6 9/2010/0153 1.3 Burnaston Etwall 20 9/2010/0476 1.4 Swadlincote Newhall 26 9/2010/0482 1.5 Egginton Etwall 31 9/2010/0582 1.6 Smisby Hartshorne/Ticknall 39 9/2010/0512 2.1 Sutton on the Hill North West 41 When moving that a site visit be held, Members will be expected to consider and propose one or more of the following reasons: 1. The issues of fact raised by the Head of Planning Services’ report or offered in explanation at the Committee meeting require further clarification by a demonstration of condition of site. 2. Further issues of principle, other than those specified in the report of the Head of Planning Services, arise from a Member’s personal knowledge of circumstances on the ground that lead to the need for clarification that may be achieved by a site visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Quarter of 2009
    REPORT ON THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2009 • Operating result 5 % up year on year • Earnings targets for the full 2009 fi scal year confi rmed • € 26 billion investment programme ending 2012 will be continued without restriction WorldReginfo - ae6faa3b-02b6-47d8-9833-a4708ff50b52 At a glance RWE Group — Key Figures Jan – Mar Jan – Mar + / - Jan – Dec 2009 2008 in % 2008 Electricity sales billion kWh 77.4 86.2 -10.2 317.1 Gas sales billion kWh 122.2 122.5 -0.2 327.8 External revenue € million 14,516 13,395 8.4 48,950 Germany € million 9,157 8,262 10.8 30,694 Outside Germany € million 5,359 5,133 4.4 18,256 EBITDA € million 3,090 2,951 1 4.7 8,773 1 Operating result € million 2,624 2,499 5.0 6,826 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 2,538 2,213 14.7 4,866 Net income € million 1,745 809 115.7 2,558 Recurrent net income € million 1,507 1,423 5.9 3,367 Earnings per share € 3.28 1.45 126.2 4.75 Recurrent net income per share € 2.83 2.55 11.0 6.25 Cash flows from operating activities € million 533 1,384 -61.5 8,853 Capital expenditure € million 2,054 672 205.7 5,693 Property, plant and equipment € million 853 657 29.8 4,454 Financial assets € million 1,201 15 – 1,239 Free cash flow € million -320 727 -144.0 4,399 Mar 31, 2009 Dec 31, 22222222008 + / - in % Net debt of the RWE Group € million 20,529 18,659 10.0 Workforce 2 66,786 65,908 1.3 1 Figure adjusted; see commentary on page 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs
    Waste & Minerals Development Framework Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs Final October 2011 Prepared for East Sussex County Council/ Brighton and Hove City Council East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Revision Schedule Hazardous Waste – Study into Future Management Needs October 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 06/06/2011 Initial Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 02 22/06/2011 Final Draft Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 03 29/09/2011 Final Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate URS/Scott Wilson 12 Regan Way Chetwynd Business Park Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6RZ Tel 0115 9077000 Fax 0115 9077001 East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of East Sussex County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed [Proposal Dated 14 April 2011]. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson.. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 69: Trent Valley Washlands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 69: Trent Valley Washlands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 69: Trent Valley Washlands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures
    RWE INNOGY FACTS & FIGURES – OFFSHORE WIND & GWYNT Y MÔR OFFSHORE WIND FARM Strong growth off the coast RWE Innogy is a market leader in the development, construction and operation of offshore wind farms in Europe. We have already gained significant experience through the delivery and operation of our existing wind farms – North Hoyle and Rhyl Flats off the Welsh coast, and Thornton Bank off the Belgian coast. Our first German project – Nordsee Ost – is due to start construction next year, some 22 miles off the island of Helgoland. In addition, we aim to be using our own construction vessels from 2011 onwards. RWE Innogy has major plans for the future for offshore development and for helping tackle climate change through its pipeline offshore wind portfolio . A list of current projects: RWE Innogy’s Offshore Wind Projects In operation: North Hoyle 1) (UK/60 MW) Dogger Bank 5) (9.000 MW) Rhyl Flats (UK/90 MW) Triton Knoll (1.200 MW) Thornton Bank 2) (Belgium/30 MW) North Hoyle 1) (60 MW) Nordsee Ost (295 MW) Under construction: Innogy Nordsee 1 Greater Gabbard 3) (UK/504 MW) Gwynt y Môr 4) (576 MW) (about 1.000 MW) Investment/construction decision granted: Rhyl Flats (90 MW) Tromp Binnen (300 MW) Nordsee Ost (Germany/295 MW) Atlantic Array (1.500 MW) 4) Gwynt y Môr (UK/576 MW) Thornton Bank 2) (30 MW) 3) Project pipeline: Greater Gabbard (504 MW) Thornton Bank 2 & 3 (Belgium/295 MW) Galloper 3) (500 MW) Innogy Nordsee 1 (Germany/approx. 1,000 MW) Projects in operation or under construction Triton Knoll (UK/1,200 MW) Projects consented or in development 3) Galloper (UK/500 MW) 1) North Hoyle offshore windfarm (60 MW) is owned by Zephyr Investments Ltd.
    [Show full text]