DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Equality Statistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Equality Statistics Research report: 1 Review of equality statistics Sylvia Walby, Jo Armstrong, Les Humphreys Lancaster University Review of equality statistics Sylvia Walby OBE AcSS FRSA UNESCO Chair in Gender Research Jo Armstrong PhD Department of Sociology Les Humphreys PhD Centre for Applied Statistics Lancaster University Equality and Human Rights Commission 2008 First published Autumn 2008 ISBN 978 1 84206 074 2 EHRC RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The EHRC Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the EHRC by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other EHRC research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/policyresearch/pages/default.aspx If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii PART ONE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Aims and context 1 1.2 Topics and focus 1 1.3 Data resources and quality 4 1.4 Guide for specific users 5 1.5 Content of report 5 2. METHODOLOGY AND KEY CONCEPTS 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Defining key concepts 6 2.3 Criteria of quality of statistics 10 2.4 Review of existing and suggested indicators 14 2.5 Data resources: surveys, administrative data and indicator sets 19 3. EVALUATION: STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES 21 3.1 Introduction 21 3.2 Strands: availability, definitions, classifications, developments 21 3.3 Geographic areas 37 3.4 Technical aspects: gaps, rates and thresholds 39 3.5 Domains 41 4. CONCLUSIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HEADLINE INDICATORS 60 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Potential headline indicators 62 4.3 Data needs to support proposed headline indicators 92 4.4 Technical appendix: definitions and data sources 96 PART TWO 5. KEY STATISTICS 100 5.1 Introduction 100 5.2 Index of key statistics 103 6. DATA RESOURCES 253 6.1 Introduction 253 6.2 List of data sources 256 6.3 Surveys 259 6.4 Administrative data sources 377 6.5 Indicator data sets 400 REFERENCES 419 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the many people who have contributed their expertise and time to this report. Brian Francis and Dave Lucy are thanked for their statistical support and advice. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) provided very helpful advice on drafts of the report, especially Jennifer Thomas who organised the responses of her colleagues, including Theodore Joloza, Nick Perkins, Rachel Skentelbery and those who work on the equality domains (disability; sexual identity; ethnicity; identity; language; and religion) and the ONS survey managers for the Expenditure and Food Survey, Integrated Household Survey (IHS), Labour Force Survey, English Housing Survey and Omnibus survey. Dave Perfect, our Research Manager at the EHRC, supported the project and provided excellent detailed assistance during the editing of the report. We would also like to thank the copy editor, Emma Wise, for her thorough editing of the report. The EHRC Project Management Team of Dave Perfect, Karen Hurrell and David Darton provided feedback on the interim report and draft final report. The participants in the Government Equalities Office (GEO) meeting (3 July 2008), led by Giovanni Razzu, provided helpful comments on the project. We had helpful written comments from: Arik Dondi and Stephen Hall (Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs); Lawrence Singer (Office of Criminal Justice Reform, Home Office); Amanda Tuke (Deputy Director, ONS); and Karen Lucas (Centre for Sustainable Development, University of Westminster). We were assisted in Scottish matters by comments from Sara Grainger who also organised responses from her colleagues in Scottish Government; and in Welsh matters by Steven Marshall, Jessica McQuade, Martin Parry and colleagues from the Welsh Assembly Government. We were assisted in accessing data by Liz Kelly and Jo Lovett (Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University), Eileen Maitland (Rape Crisis Scotland), Marianne Hester and Emma Williamson (Violence Against Women Research Group, University of Bristol), and Karen Hawkes (General Register Office for Scotland). Also, thanks to Paul Iganksi for his advice on hate crime data. i ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) commissioned this review as part of its remit to map the equalities landscape across England, Scotland and Wales. The report examines the extent to which data are available for the following equality strands: sex; ethnicity / race; disability; religion or belief; age; sexual orientation; and also for socio-economic status (social class). The extent to which statistics are available at different levels of geographic classification (UK, GB, England, Scotland and Wales and regional and local areas within this) is investigated. The report addresses the ten domains of equality identified in the equality measurement framework in the Equalities Review.1 These are: Longevity Physical security Health Education Standard of living Productive and valued activities Individual, family and social life Participation, influence and voice Identity, expression and self-respect Legal security 1 The Equalities Review was commissioned by the Cabinet Office to: provide an understanding of the long-term and underlying causes of disadvantage that need to be addressed by public policy; make practical recommendations on key policy priorities for a range of organisations; and inform both the modernisation of equality legislation, towards a Single Equality Act; and to develop the new Commission for Equality and Human Rights. Its findings were presented to the Prime Minister in 2007 (Equalities Review, 2007d). iii REVIEW OF EQUALITY STATISTICS METHODOLOGY Four sources of information were used in this review: A review of work on statistics and indicators relevant to equality produced by government departments and bodies, the legacy (equality) Commissions, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the devolved administrations, policy organisations, academics, the European Commission and other individuals and organisations. A systematic analysis of 34 national surveys and 12 administrative data sources to assess the extent to which they provide equality data. This included examining their content, size, sample design, frequency, strand availability and geographic area. The number and percentage of respondents from each equality strand are calculated and the wording of relevant questions provided. A review of 12 existing indicator sets on diverse aspects of well-being and policy performance, which include measures relevant to equality, produced by government departments and bodies and by policy organisations. Consultation with the ONS (including their heads of equality domains and managers of major surveys), relevant government departments, devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales, academic and other experts, through meetings (including one organised by the Government Equalities Office) and comments on the interim and draft final reports. KEY FINDINGS Coverage of equality strands Sex Most, but not all, of the key statistics and indictors are available disaggregated by sex. The main exceptions found were in the dimensions of physical and legal security, where recorded crime statistics, which use official crime categories, do not include the sex of the victim; nor is „domestic violence‟ a crime category. The development of information systems on crime against women and minorities is proceeding, but is far from complete. The use of the household as an alternative (rather than in addition) to the individual as the unit in some data sources and the use of a „household reference person‟ as the source of data can have the consequence of making gender invisible. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ethnicity / race The Census (England and Wales) categorisation of ethnic groups is widely treated as authoritative for survey and administrative data. The largest challenge in the use of ethnicity data is the small sizes of some of the groups, which mean that survey samples cannot be meaningfully disaggregated into these 16 categories, since the findings would not be statistically robust. There are various technical ways of addressing this, but each has disadvantages. These include: grouping together (or aggregating) some ethnic categories, but with the loss of potentially important distinctions; aggregating data from more than one year, but this depends on there being no significant changes during those years, for example in the wording of questions; and providing additional boosts to the main sample composed of those from ethnic minority groups, but this can introduce complexity and loss of transparency. Disability There are important differences in the conceptualisation of disability which underpin significant differences in the key statistics and indicators used to measure it, not least between the traditional approach that treats the individual‟s impairment as the locus of the problem, and the „social model‟ approach which treats
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDAI Phase 1 – Funded Projects
    SDAI Phase 1 – funded projects The health and wellbeing of grandparents caring for grandchildren: The role of cumulative advantage/disadvantage Dr Karen Glaser, King's College London Email: [email protected] Social connections and wellbeing in older adults Professor Andrew Steptoe, University College London Email: [email protected] Pensions, health and wellbeing of older people in developing countries: insights from the WHO SAGE survey Professor Peter Lloyd-Sherlock, University of East Anglia Email: [email protected] Disability and care needs in the older population: disability benefits, social care and wellbeing Professor Ruth Hancock, University of East Anglia Email: [email protected] Loneliness in later life: a longitudinal analysis using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Professor Christina Victor, Brunel University Email: [email protected] Alcohol consumption, life course transitions and health in later life Professor Clare Holdsworth, Keele University Email: [email protected] Sleep disturbances and mild cognitive impairment in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Dr Michelle Miller, University of Warwick Email: [email protected] Older people's experiences of dignity and nutrition during hospital stays: Secondary data analysis using the Adult Inpatient Survey Dr Polly Vizard, London School of Economics and Pol Science Email: [email protected] Flexible aging: new ways to measure and explore the diverse experience of population aging in Scotland, using the Scottish
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Status of Women in Taiwan: 1945-2010
    The Changing Status of Women in Taiwan: 1945-2010 by Mei-Lien Lu A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 7, 2012 Key words: women, status, Taiwan, culture, development, democratization Copyright 2012 by Mei-Lien Lu Approved by Cal Clark, Chair, Alumni Professor of Political Science, Director of the MPA Program Cynthia J. Bowling, Associate Professor of Political Science and Ph.D. Program Director Linda F. Dennard, Professor of Political Science at Auburn University-Montgomery Murray Jardine, Jane Dickerson Lanier Professor of Political Science Abstract This dissertation analyzes the economic, social, and political status of women in Taiwan from 1945 to 2010. This research was guided by a theoretical model of how the status of women worldwide is influenced by the extent of patriarchal culture, the level of economic development, and the degree of democratization. Hypotheses drawn from the theoretical model were tested by using data collected from 174 developing and developed nations. Overall, the statistical analysis found that patriarchal culture, economic development, and democratization exert fairly strong influences over some dimensions of women’s status but have little association with others. This implies that the nature of women’s status is complex and complicated because each nation has its own circumstances that are shaped by its historical background, traditional culture, geographic location, and so on. Therefore case studies of individual countries should provide valuable insights into the dynamics of women’s changing status in the contemporary world. This dissertation presents such a case study that analyzes the status of Taiwanese women in terms of social conditions, human and social capital, economic activities, and political participation and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Honour and Shame for South Asian British Muslim Men and Women
    EXPLORING HONOUR AND SHAME FOR SOUTH ASIAN BRITISH MUSLIM MEN AND WOMEN A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 NASREEN MANSOOR School of Environment, Education and Development LIST OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 9 LIST OF TABLES 9 LIST OF GLOSSARY 11 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 13 ABSTRACT 14 DECLARATION 15 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Chapter Overview 18 1.2 Researcher’s Personal Experience of Honour and Shame 18 1.3 Researcher’s Professional Experience of Working with Honour and 21 Shame Issues 1.4 Researcher’s Academic Interest in Honour and Shame 22 1.5 Reasons for the South Asian Diaspora Selection 22 1.6 Setting the Study into Context Nationally and Internationally 24 1.7 Honour and Shame as a Worldwide Issue 24 1.8 Honour Based Crimes and Killings 26 1.9 Honour and Shame as a UK Issue 27 1.10 Precis of Honour and Shame 29 1.11 Research Process 29 1.12 Research Questions, Aims and Objectives 32 1.13 Researcher Insider/Outsider Positionality and Reflexivity 32 1.14 Reflexivity 40 1.15 Summary 41 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Chapter Overview 42 2 2.2 Literature Review Aim 42 2.3 Literature Review Process 42 2.4 Honour 45 2.4.1 The Definition of Honour 45 2.4.2 Islam and Honour 46 2.4.3 South Asian Culture and Honour 47 2.4.4 Gender and Honour 48 2.4.5 Individual Honour 51 2.4.6 Collective Honour 52 2.4.7 Internal Honour 54 2.4.8 External Honour 54 2.5 Shame 55 2.5.1 The Definition of Shame 55 2.5.2 Islam and Shame
    [Show full text]
  • Main Panel C
    MAIN PANEL C Sub-panel 13: Architecture, Built Environment and Planning Sub-panel 14: Geography and Environmental Studies Sub-panel 15: Archaeology Sub-panel 16: Economics and Econometrics Sub-panel 17: Business and Management Studies Sub-panel 18: Law Sub-panel 19: Politics and International Studies Sub-panel 20: Social Work and Social Policy Sub-panel 21: Sociology Sub-panel 22: Anthropology and Development Studies Sub-panel 23: Education Sub-panel 24: Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism Where required, specialist advisers have been appointed to the REF sub-panels to provide advice to the REF sub-panels on outputs in languages other than English, and / or English-language outputs in specialist areas, that the panel is otherwise unable to assess. This may include outputs containing a substantial amount of code, notation or technical terminology analogous to another language In addition to these appointments, specialist advisers will be appointed for the assessment of classified case studies and are not included in the list of appointments. Main Panel C Main Panel C Chair Professor Jane Millar University of Bath Deputy Chair Professor Graeme Barker* University of Cambridge Members Professor Robert Blackburn University of Liverpool Mr Stephen Blakeley 3B Impact From Mar 2021 Professor Felicity Callard* University of Glasgow Professor Joanne Conaghan University of Bristol Professor Nick Ellison University of York Professor Robert Hassink Kiel University Professor Kimberly Hutchings Queen Mary University of London From Jan 2021
    [Show full text]
  • Oswestry, Hay-On-Wye and Berwick-Upon-Tweed: Football Fandom, Nationalism and National Identity Across the Celtic Borders
    Oswestry, Hay-on-Wye and Berwick-upon-Tweed: Football fandom, nationalism and national identity across the Celtic borders Robert Bevan School of Welsh Cardiff University 2016 This thesis is submitted to the School of Welsh, Cardiff University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. All rights reserved. 1 Form: PGR_Submission_2014 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF THESIS FORM: POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH APPENDIX 1: Specimen layout for Thesis Summary and Declaration/Statements page to be included in a Thesis DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ………………………… ( PhD) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • (VAMHN) (DAB37) Domestic Abuse Bill: Briefing Prepare
    Written evidence submitted by the Violence Abuse and Mental Health Network (VAMHN) (DAB37) Domestic Abuse Bill: Briefing prepared for the Public Bill Committee Introduction 1. The Violence Abuse and Mental Health Network (VAMHN – www.vamhn.co.uk) is an interdisciplinary research network that aims to understand, prevent, and reduce the impact of domestic and sexual violence and abuse on mental health. We are funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). 2. We bring together experts with different ways of thinking about violence, abuse, and mental health – some with lived experience of these issues, others with expertise from the work they do – through the provision of engagement, capacity building, and funding opportunities. 3. We have almost 700 members drawn from academic, healthcare and other statutory services, the third sector, and policy. 4. This briefing has been prepared by the VAMHN leadership team. A list of signatory members is enclosed at the end of the briefing. Proposed amendments to the Bill Action to address the under-provision of services for adult and child victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. 1. We recommend extending the provisions in the Bill to address the current under-provision of services for adult and child victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. 2. We note that children who live with domestic abuse are victims in their own right, who may experience the consequences of abuse throughout their whole lives. Research highlights, for example, that experiencing domestic abuse in childhood is common1 and is associated with a wide range of negative outcomes including post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety and 1 A UK survey conducted by the NSPCC in 2009 found that 12% of under 11s and 17.5% of 11-17 year-olds had been exposed to domestic abuse: Radford et al (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Comprehensive Policy
    STOPPING RAPE TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE POLICY Sylvia Walby Philippa Olive Jude Towers Brian Francis Sofia Strid Andrea Krizsan Emanuela Lombardo Corinne May-Chahal Suzanne Franzway David Sugarman Bina Agarwal Jo Armstrong STOPPING RAPE Towards a comprehensive policy Sylvia Walby, Philippa Olive, Jude Towers, Brian Francis, Sofia Strid, Andrea Krizsán, Emanuela Lombardo, Corinne May-Chahal, Suzanne Franzway, David Sugarman, Bina Agarwal and Jo Armstrong i First published in Great Britain in 2015 by Policy Press North America office: University of Bristol Policy Press 1-9 Old Park Hill c/o The University of Chicago Press Bristol BS2 8BB 1427 East 60th Street UK Chicago, IL 60637, USA t: +44 (0)117 954 5940 t: +1 773 702 7700 [email protected] f: +1 773 702 9756 www.policypress.co.uk [email protected] www.press.uchicago.edu The digital PDF version of this title is available Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits adaptation, alteration, reproduction and distribution for non-commercial use, without further permission provided the original work is attributed. The derivative works do not need to be licensed on the same terms. © Policy Press 2015 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested. ISBN 978 1 4473 2209 2 paperback ISBN 978 1 4473 2212 2 ePub ISBN 978 1 4473 2211 5 Kindle ISBN 978 1 4473 5156 6 OA pdf The right of Sylvia Walby, Philippa Olive, Jude Towers, Brian Francis, Sofia Strid, Andrea Krizsán, Emanuela Lombardo, Corinne May-Chahal, Suzanne Franzway, David Sugarman, Bina Agarwal and Jo Armstrong to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Walby, Sylvia, Olive, Philippa, Towers, Jude, Francis, Brian, Strid, Sofia, Krizsan, Andrea, Lombardo, Emanuela, May-Chahal
    Walby, Sylvia, Olive, Philippa, Towers, Jude, Francis, Brian, Strid, Sofia, Krizsan, Andrea, Lombardo, Emanuela, May-Chahal, Corinne, Franzway, Suzanne, Sugarman, David, Agarwal, Bina and Armstrong, Jo (2015) Stopping rape: towards a comprehensive policy. Policy Press, Bristol, UK. Downloaded from: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4106/ Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository ‘Insight’ must conform to the following fair usage guidelines. Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that • the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form • a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work • the content is not changed in any way • all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not • sell any part of an item • refer to any part of an item without citation • amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator’s reputation • remove or alter the copyright statement on an item. The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvia Walby Is a Professor in the Department of Sociology At
    Sylvia Walby Sylvia Walby is Professor of Sociology and UNESCO Chair of Gender Research at Lancaster University, UK. She has previously been Professor of Sociology in the Universities of Leeds and Bristol, and Reader at the LSE; and founding President of the European Sociological Association. She was the founding Director of the Lancaster Women’s Studies Research Centre and of the LSE Gender Institute. She was awarded an OBE for services to equal opportunities and diversity in 2008. She is an Academician of the Academy of Social Sciences, Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts and President of the International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Economy and Society. She has been a research consultant to the UK Home Office, UK Women and Equality Unit, UK Equal Opportunities Commission, UK Equalities and Human Rights Commission, European Commission, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, and the United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women. She is a former Co-Chair of the UK Women’s Budget Group. She is currently developing a project on ‘Gender and the financial crisis’ for UNESCO. Publications include: Theorizing Patriarchy (Blackwell 1990); Gender Transformations (Routledge 1997); Patriarchy at Work, (Polity 1986); Sex Crime in the News (with Soothill) (Routledge 1991); Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey (with Allen) (Home Office Research Study 2004); The Cost of Domsetic Violence (Women and Equality Unit, 2004); Gendering the Knowledge Economy: Comparative Perspectives, co-edited with Gottfried, Gottschall and Osawa (Palgrave 2007); Gender Mainstreaming, editor of a special issue Social Politics, 2005, 12, 3, 321-452.
    [Show full text]
  • IMG/Pdf/GAP-09 EN.Pdf] [Accessed 23 Mar
    Durham E-Theses GENDER AND EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE A STUDY OF QATARI WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS LARI, NOORA,AHMED How to cite: LARI, NOORA,AHMED (2016) GENDER AND EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE A STUDY OF QATARI WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11855/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 1 GENDER AND EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE – A STUDY OF QATARI WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS NOORA AHMED GH A LARI School of Applied Social Sciences University of Durham, UK 2016 2 Declaration I declare that this thesis, which I submit for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Durham, is my own work. This is not the same as any other work that has previously been submitted for a degree at any other institutions or universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecturers Violence and Society Centre
    Lecturers Violence and Society Centre Lecturer in International Politics: ‘Global Political Violence’ Lecturer in Law: ‘Violence in the Law’ Lecturer in Sociology: ‘Violence and Society’ (2 posts) Senior Lecturer in Health: ‘Violence and Health’ http://www.city.ac.uk/ August 2019 Academic excellence for business and the professions Role Profile Posts: Lecturers (Researchers) within the Violence and Society Centre: In Sociology: ‘Violence and Society’ (2 posts) In International Politics: ‘Global Political Violence’ In Law: ‘Violence and the Law’ Senior Lecturer in Health: ‘Violence and Health’ Department: Sociology, School of Arts and Social Sciences International Politics, School of Arts and Social Sciences Law, City School of Law Health, Health Services Research and Management Division, School of Health Sciences Grade: Lecturers Grade 6/7 Senior Lecturer Grade 8 Tenure: Permanent Full-time Responsible to: Director of the Violence and Society Centre (and, after 3 years, the Head of the relevant Department) Background City, University of London City, University of London is a global university committed to academic excellence with an excellent central London location. Led by President, Professor Sir Paul Curran, City has made significant investments in its academic staff, its estate and its infrastructure and continues to work towards realising its vision of being a leading global university. In the last REF, City doubled the proportion of its total academic staff producing world-leading or internationally excellent research. It has recently agreed a new Vision & Strategy 2026. Founded in 1894, City is celebrating its 125th anniversary this year. Violence and Society Centre The Violence and Society Centre was established at City, University of London on 1 March 2019, with Professor Sylvia Walby OBE as its Director.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Main Panel a 1 Clinical Medicine 2 Public Health, Health Services And
    Main Panel A 1 Clinical Medicine 2 Public Health, health services and Primary Care 3 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy 4 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience 5 Biological Sciences 6 Agriculture, Food and Veterinary Sciences Main Panel B 7 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences 8 Chemistry 9 Physics 10 Mathematical Sciences 11 Computer Sciences and Informatics 12 Engineering Main Panel C 13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning 14 Geography and Environmental Studies 15 Archaeology 16 Economics and Econometrics 17 Business and Management Studies 18 Law 19 Politics and International Studies 20 Social Work and Social Policy 21 Sociology 22 Anthropology and Development Studies 23 Education 24 Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism Main Panel D 25 Area Studies 26 Modern Languages and Linguistics 27 English Language and Literature 28 History 29 Classics 30 Philosophy 31 Theology and Religious Studies 32 Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory 33 Music, Drama, Dance, performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies 34 Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management 1 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Main Panel A Chair Professor John Iredale University of Bristol Deputy Chair Professor Sir Nilesh Samani British Heart Foundation Members Professor Doreen Cantrell University of Dundee Professor Peter Clegg University of Liverpool Professor David Crossman Chief Scientist Scottish Government Professor Dame Anna Dominiczak*
    [Show full text]