DOCSLIB.ORG

Intolerance in Western Europe Analysis of Trends and Associated Factors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. EUROPE Intolerance in Western Europe Analysis of trends and associated factors Jennifer Rubin, Jirka Taylor, Alexandra Pollitt, Joachim Krapels, Mafalda Pardal EUROPE Intolerance in Western Europe Analysis of trends and associated factors Jennifer Rubin, Jirka Taylor, Alexandra Pollitt, Joachim Krapels, Mafalda Pardal Supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations The research described in this report was supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations. RAND Europe is an independent, not-for-profit policy research organisation that aims to improve policy and decisionmaking for the public interest though research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark © Copyright 2014 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial pur- poses. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For informa- tion on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/publications/permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA DOHA, QA • CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org • www.rand.org/randeurope Preface RAND Europe was commissioned by the Open Society European Policy Institute to conduct a study exploring the empirical evidence on high-level trends in intolerance in Western Europe. The primary focus was on expressed intolerance of others on the grounds of race, religion or ethnicity. Our research approach comprised a literature review, analysis of European attitudinal data, and assessments of contextual trends in eight countries. This report sets out the study’s rationale, methodology and findings, from which we develop a set of policy considerations to encourage evidence-based discussion and decision- making among programme funders and policymakers. RAND Europe is an independent not-for-profit policy research organisation that aims to improve policy and decision making in the public interest, through research and analysis. RAND Europe’s clients include European governments, institutions, NGOs and firms with a need for rigorous, independent, multidisciplinary analysis. This report has been peer reviewed in accordance with RAND’s quality assurance standards. For more information about RAND Europe or this document, please contact: Jennifer Rubin RAND Europe Westbrook Centre Milton Road Cambridge CB4 1YG United Kingdom Tel. +44 (1223) 353 329 [email protected] iii Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................ iii Contents ....................................................................................................................... v Table of figures ...........................................................................................................vii Table of tables ............................................................................................................. ix Executive summary ...................................................................................................... xi Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. xv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... xvii CHAPTER 1 Introduction and context ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Conceptualisation of intolerance and research questions ...................... 2 1.1.2 Perceived rising intolerance .................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Apparent rise in support for extremist and populist political parties in many countries ..................................................................... 4 1.1.4 Apparent rise in intolerant policies and behaviours ............................... 5 1.2 Research approach and scope ............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Literature review .................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Analysis of survey datasets .................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Country assessments ............................................................................ 8 1.2.4 Theoretical issues and strengths/limitations of data .............................. 9 CHAPTER 2 Analysis and findings – European survey datasets ................................. 11 2.1 Trends in intolerance....................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Trends in expressed intolerance vary across countries and over time ................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Trends in expressed intolerance also vary towards different groups ................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Convergence / divergence across Western European countries ......................... 15 2.2.1 Opinions and attitudes among individual Western European countries have moved apart ................................................................ 15 CHAPTER 3 Analysis and findings – factors .............................................................. 17 3.1 Factors considered to be associated with intolerance ........................................ 19 3.1.1 Economic factors ............................................................................... 20 v Intolerance in Western Europe RAND Europe 3.1.2 Demographic factors .......................................................................... 23 3.1.3 Socio-political factors ......................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Cultural factors .................................................................................. 28 CHAPTER 4 Analysis and findings – country assessments ......................................... 33 4.1.1 Denmark ............................................................................................ 33 4.1.2 Finland .............................................................................................. 38 4.1.3 France ................................................................................................ 42 4.1.4 Germany ............................................................................................ 46 4.1.5 Italy ................................................................................................... 53 4.1.6 The Netherlands ................................................................................ 57 4.1.7 Spain .................................................................................................. 61 4.1.8 The United Kingdom ........................................................................ 65 CHAPTER 5 Conclusions and implications ............................................................... 71 5.1 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 71 5.2 Emerging policy considerations........................................................................ 73 5.2.1 High-level policy considerations ......................................................... 73 5.2.2 Perspectives on targeted interventions ................................................ 78 5.3 Areas for further research ................................................................................. 81 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Select Bibliography

    Select Bibliography

    After the Nazi Racial State: Difference and Democracy in Germany and Europe Rita Chin, Heide Fehrenbach, Geoff Eley, and Atina Grossmann http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=354212 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. Select Bibliography GERMANY AFTER 1945 Alba, Richard, Peter Schmidt, and Martina Wasmer, eds. Germans or Foreigners? Attitudes toward Ethnic Minorities in Post-Reuni‹cation Germany. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Ahonen, Pertti. After the Expulsion: West Germany and Eastern Europe, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Arndt, Susan, ed. AfrikaBilder. Studien zu Rassismus in Deutschland. Münster: Un- rast, 2001. Bade, Klaus, ed. Neue Heimat im Westen: Vertriebene, Flüchtlinge, Aussiedler. Münster: Westfälischer Heimatbund, 1990. Behrends, Jan C., Thomas Lindenberger, and Patrice G. Poutrus, eds. Fremde und Fremd-Sein in der DDR: zu historischen Ursachen der Fremdenfeindlichkeit in Ostdeutschland. Berlin: Metropol, 2003. Benz, Wolfgang, ed. Antisemitismus in Deutschland. Zur Aktualität eines Vorteils. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1995. Benz, Wolfgang, ed. Jahrbuch für Antisemitismusforschung. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1995–. Berg, Nicolas. Der Holocaust und die westdeutschen Historiker. Göttingen: Wall- stein, 2004. Bergmann, Werner, and Rainer Erb. Antisemitism in Germany: The Post-Nazi Epoch since 1945. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1997. Beyer, Heidemarie. “Entwicklung des Ausländerrechts in der DDR.” Zwischen Na- tionalstaat und multikultureller Gesellschaft. Einwanderung und Fremden- feindlichkeit in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Manfred Heßler, 211–27. Berlin: Hitit Verlag, 1993. Biess, Frank. Homecomings: Returning POWs and the Legacies of Defeat in Post- war Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. Bloxham, Donald. Genocide on Trial: War Crimes Trials and the Formation of Holocaust History and Memory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • European Stability Mechanism

    European Stability Mechanism

    ~FACTSHEET~ European Stability Mechanism The Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) has been ratified by all 17 euro area member states. It entered into force on 27 September 2012, nine months earlier than initially foreseen 1. The treaty was signed by euro area member states on 2 February 2012. The ESM board of governors held its inaugural meeting on 8 October 2012. The ESM is an intergovernmental institution based in Luxembourg, set up to provide financial assistance to eurozone member states experiencing, or being threatened by, severe financing problems, if this is indispensable for safeguarding financial stability in the euro area as a whole. The initial maximum lending capacity of the ESM is set at €500 billion. This is achieved with subscribed capital of €700 billion (€ 80 billion paid-in capital, the rest callable). A first version of the treaty was signed on 11 July 2011, but it was subsequently modified to incorporate decisions taken by the heads of state and government of the euro area on 21 July and 9 December 2011 to improve the effectiveness of the mechanism. As a permanent mechanism, the ESM will take over the tasks currently fulfilled by the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). With the accelerated entry into force, the ESM will now operate alongside the EFSF for nine months. In March 2012, the Eurogroup agreed to raise the overall ceiling for ESM/EFSF lending to €700 billion 2. Already during the transitional period, until mid-2013, the ESM will be the main instrument for the financing of new programmes.
  • Reparations for the Slave Trade: Rhetoric, Law, History and Political Realities”

    Reparations for the Slave Trade: Rhetoric, Law, History and Political Realities”

    ©Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann Feb 5, 2007 1 WORKING PAPER “Reparations for the Slave Trade: Rhetoric, Law, History and Political Realities” Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann Canada Research Chair International Human Rights Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5 [email protected], +1 (519) 884-0710 ext 2780 Neither this paper, nor any part of it, is to be reproduced or circulated without permission of the author. Note to Readers: This paper is drawn from my book in progress (with Anthony P. Lombardo), Reparations to Africa, especially chapter 5 (“The Slave Trade: Law and Rhetoric”), chapter 6 “The Slave Trade: Debates,” and chapter 1, “Reparations to Africa: A New Kind of Justice.” Introduction This paper considers the call for reparations to Africa from the West, for the trans-Atlantic slave trade, as a form of transitional justice between regions (the West and Africa), which might result in better understanding—and less political resentment, between the two areas. Nevertheless, the call for reparations is so far ridden with rhetorical over-statements, misunderstandings of international law, and misinterpretations C:/reparations/working papers/UConn march 12 07 ©Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann Feb 5, 2007 2 of history. These are unlikely to result in any material reparations from the West to Africa for the slave trade. The discussion below focuses especially on the 2001 United Nations World Conference against Racism in Durban, South Africa, and on the call for reparations by the Group of Eminent Persons (GEP) established by the Organization of African Unity in 1992. The two remaining active members of the GEP in the early twenty-first century were Ali Mazrui and Jacob Ajayi.
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
  • Should Poland Join the Euro? an Economic and Political Analysis

    Should Poland Join the Euro? an Economic and Political Analysis

    Should Poland Join the Euro? An Economic and Political Analysis Should Poland Join the Euro? An Economic and Political Analysis Graduate Policy Workshop February 2016 Michael Carlson Conor Carroll Iris Chan Geoff Cooper Vanessa Lehner Kelsey Montgomery Duc Tran Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ i About the WWS Graduate Policy Workshop ........................................................................................ ii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 2 The Evolution of Polish Thought on Euro Adoption ................................................................. 5 2.1 Pre-EU membership reforms ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 After EU Accession ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Crisis years ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Post-crisis assessment ..................................................................................................................................
  • The Treatment of Ethnic Minority Groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1

    The Treatment of Ethnic Minority Groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1

    19th July 2017 (COI up to 20 June 2017) Vietnam Query Response: The treatment of ethnic minority groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1 Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms Issues for research 1) Background information on ethnic minority groups in Vietnam 2) Freedom of Religion a) How does Decree 92 (Specific provisions and measures for the implementation of the Ordinance on Belief and Religion, 1 January 2013) affect the right to freedom of religion in practice? b) Latest information with regards to the November 2016 ‘Law on Belief and Religion’ c) What restrictions or limitations are imposed by the authorities on Hmongs’ and Montagnards’ right to practice their faith? i) Reports of forced conversion (from Protestantism to animism) ii) Treatment by the police for religious reasons, including harassment, intimidation, monitoring, arrest and imprisonment iii) Reports of obstructing religious ceremonies (e.g. in house churches) or damaging religious property 3) Confiscation of land of Hmongs and Montagnards a) Information on the practices related to legal expropriation and illegal confiscation of land in Vietnam, including in relation to industrial development projects in the geographical areas where Hmong/Montagnards are living 4) Freedom of Movement of Hmongs and Montagnards a) Are the legal provisions of Art 274 of the Penal Code (Illegally leaving or entering the country: illegally staying abroad or in Vietnam) and Art 91 of the Penal Code (Fleeing abroad or defecting to stay overseas with a view to
  • Ethnic Origin and Disability Data Collection in Europe: Measuring Inequality – Combating Discrimination

    Ethnic Origin and Disability Data Collection in Europe: Measuring Inequality – Combating Discrimination

    POLICY REPORT Equality Data Initiative ETHNIC ORIGIN AND DISABILITY DATA COLLECTION IN EUROPE: MEASURING INEQUALITY – COMBATING DISCRIMINATION November 2014 Authors: Isabelle Chopin, Lilla Farkas, and Catharina Germaine, Migration Policy Group for Open Society Foundations Editors: Costanza Hermanin and Angelina Atanasova POLICY REPORT: ETHNIC ORIGIN AND DISABILITY DATA COLLECTION IN EUROPE Contents Glossary .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................11 1.1 Note on concepts: equality data, ethnic data, disability, race and ethnic origin .......11 1.2 Purpose of the research .................................................................................................. 15 1.3 Statement of the issue ..................................................................................................... 17 2. Antecedents: European-level research and legal framework............................................. 21 2.1 Legal and policy frameworks for equality data collection in Europe ......................... 21 2.2 Research identifying a need for reliable and adequate equality data ....................... 26 2.3 European law .................................................................................................................
  • Nowcasting Eurozone Industrial Production

    Nowcasting Eurozone Industrial Production

    2003 EDITION Nowcasting Eurozone Industrial Production THEME 1 General EUROPEAN statistics COMMISSION 1 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union New freephone number: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003 ISBN 92-894-3416-3 ISSN 1725-4825 © European Communities, 2003 Nowcasting Eurozone Industrial Production Dominique Ladiray and Dermot O’Brien Abstract The aim of this paper is to develop a methodology for the estima- tion of nowcasts of the Eurozone Industrial Production Index (IPI) for a delay of less than 45 days. We propose to build well-specified robust models for annual and monthly eurozone IPI growth rates that incor- porate information from business surveys and partial information from Member States. We prioritise models that are stable and well-specified and the optimal models are determined on the basis of an assessment of nowcasting performance for real-time data. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 3 2. Evolution of Arrival Delays ....................................................................... 3 3. Prospects for an Early IPI .......................................................................... 5 4. Developing a Methodology for Producing IPI Nowcasts .......................... 6 5. Models for Eurozone IPI............................................................................ 7 5.1 Annual IPI Growth Rates .................................................................... 7 5.1.1 Model A: NAIVE Model ........................................................... 7 5.1.2 Model B: GETS with Business Surveys.................................... 8 5.1.3 Model C: GETS with Business Surveys and Partial Information (1) ..............................................................
  • Regional Cooperation: Experiences, Constraints and Opportunities Final Report

    Regional Cooperation: Experiences, Constraints and Opportunities Final Report

    2012:30 Sida Decentralised Evaluation Joakim Anger Reform cooperation in the Western Balkans - regional cooperation: experiences, constraints and opportunities Final Report Reform cooperation in the Western Balkans - regional cooperation: experiences, constraints and opportunities Final Report December 2012 Joakim Anger Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2012:30 Sida Authors: Joakim Anger The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2012:30 Commissioned by Sida, Department for Reform and Selective Cooperation Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: December 2012 Published by Citat 2012 Art. no. Sida61560en urn:nbn:se:sida-61560en This publication can be downloaded from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: S-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Office: Valhallavägen 199, Stockholm Telephone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Telefax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64 Postgiro: 1 56 34–9. VAT. No. SE 202100-478901 E-mail: [email protected]. Homepage: http://www.sida.se Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. 4 Preface ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................
  • Understanding Public Euroscepticism

    Understanding Public Euroscepticism

    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/qoe Understanding public Euroscepticism Citation: Simona Guerra (2020) Under- standing public Euroscepticism. Quad- Simona Guerra erni dell’Osservatorio elettorale – Ital- ian Journal of Electoral Studies 83(2): University of Surrey, United Kingdom, 0000-0003-3911-258X 45-56. doi: 10.36253/qoe-9672 E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 4, 2020 Abstract. Euroscepticism has become more and more embedded both at the EU and Accepted: December 17, 2020 national levels (Usherwood et al. 2013) and persistent across domestic debates (Ush- erwood and Startin 2013). This study presents an in-depth analysis of contemporary Published: December 23, 2020 narratives of Euroscepticism. It first introduces its question related to understanding Copyright: © 2020 Simona Guerra. This public Euroscepticism, following the British EU referendum campaign and outcome, to is an open access, peer-reviewed then present the established literature, and the analysis of the British case study. A sur- article published by Firenze Univer- vey run in Britain in May 2019 shows that, as already noted by Oliver Daddow (2006, sity Press (http://www.fupress.com/qoe) 2011), Euroscepticism is very much identifiable in the traditional narratives of Europe and distributed under the terms of the as the Other. Context accountability (Daddow 2006) is still cause for concern in Britain Creative Commons Attribution License, and by assuming a more positive view of a European Britain (Daddow 2006) does not which permits unrestricted use, distri- make the debate more informed. Images, narratives and specific issues to reform the bution, and reproduction in any medi- um, provided the original author and Eurosceptic toolbox into a more neutral, but informative, instrument could be applied source are credited.
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In

    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In

    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Eurosphere(s)? Fragmented and stratified or integrated and fair? A conceptual and pre-theoretical mapping exercise Bader, V. Publication date 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bader, V. (2008). Eurosphere(s)? Fragmented and stratified or integrated and fair? A conceptual and pre-theoretical mapping exercise. (Eurosphere online working paper; No. 09). Eurosphere. http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/08/Eurosphere_Working_Paper_9_Bader.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 EUROSPHERE WORKING PAPER SERIES Online W orking Paper No. 09, 2008 Eurospheres? Fragmented and Stratified or Integrated