DOCSLIB.ORG

Why France and Not Germany? a Case Study of the Far-Right

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why France and Not Germany? a Case Study of the Far-Right WHY FRANCE AND NOT GERMANY? A CASE STUDY OF THE FAR-RIGHT Jonathan Miguel Buechner A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science, Concentration European Governance. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Javier Astudillo Liesbet Hooghe Gary Marks John Stephens © 2019 Jonathan Miguel Buechner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jonathan Miguel Buechner: Why France and not Germany? A case study of the far-right (Under the direction of Gary Marks and Javier Astudillo) The conflicts structuring European society since the 1980s such as identity and immigration have affected countries in a parallel manner in response to globalization, known as the emerging transnational cleavage. However, why do far-right parties find great success in some countries related to this new cleavage and limited or no success in similar countries? Examining France and Germany, this comparative study deservedly draws national characteristics like history and culture to center-stage. By re-evaluating extant literature with this new perspective, this research has found that while the transnational cleavage was present in both countries, Germany was hindered by a strong institutional resistance to National Socialism, rife with internal party disputes, and a difficult federal structure for far-right parties to find success past the local level. Meanwhile France was successful in constructing a winning ideology with stable party leadership resulting in permanent institutionalization. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank Prof. Marks and Prof. Astudillo for their guidance and direction throughout the writing process. Their feedback and helpfulness were an integral part of this research and they consistently allowed this paper to be my own work, but steered me in the right direction whenever necessary. I must also express gratitude towards Sarah Hutchison and Katie Lindner who have been an indispensable part of my UNC experience, challenged me to grow and been there every step of the way. I would also like to thank all the wonderful professors who are part of the TAM program whose high-quality teaching has enriched my experience. Finally, I must express profound gratitude for my parents, UNC and UPF friends, and especially Patric for providing me with unfailing support and continuous encouragement throughout my years of study and throughout the thesis writing process. This accomplishment would not have been possible without them. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... vii Theory/Background- Literature Review ......................................................................................... 4 Why France and Germany? ............................................................................................................ 9 Social Framework Conditions ....................................................................................................... 13 The 2008 Eurocrisis and 2015 Refugee Crisis ................................................................. 18 Electoral Systems and Gains ......................................................................................................... 20 Party Leadership and Organization ............................................................................................... 27 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 34 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 36 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Comparative aspects of case countries ........................................................................... 13 Table 2: Electoral gains of far-right in France 1973 – 2019 (percentage of votes cast) ............... 23 Table 3: Electoral gains of far-right in Germany 1965 – 2019 (percentage of votes cast) ........... 27 vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AfD Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany) ALFA Allianz für Fortschritt und Aufbruch (Alliance for Progress and Change) CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union of Germany) CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern (Christian Social Union in Bavaria) DVU Deutsche Volksunion (German People’s Union) EU European Union FPD Freie Demokratische Partei (Free Democratic Party) FPÖ Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (Freedom Party of Austria) LPF Lijst Pim Fortuyn (Pim Fortuyn List) NPD Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (National Democratic Party of Germany) OAS Organisation Armée Secrète (Secret Armed Organization) REP Die Republikaner (The Republicans) RN Rassemblement National (National Rally) SVP Schweizerische Volkspartei (Swiss People’s Party) vii INTRODUCTION Under what conditions do far-right parties emerge? This question is the focus of much ongoing academic research, especially since the emergence of ‘post-industrial’ far-right parties in the mid-1970s and beyond. Across Europe, these parties have experienced electoral success in the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Austria to name a few prominent cases. In general terms, far- right parties can be characterized by “an emphasis of natural community and hostility towards foreigners…a distrust for democratic individual representation…a call for unbounded authority and the recasting of a strong state” (Ignazi 2003, 18). These common features help to provide a base through which to analyze the similarities and differences between countries in which these kinds of parties emerge or attempt to emerge. Concurrent with the ‘third-wave’ of right-wing extremism during the 1970s and 1980s, the conflicts of the post-industrial society which include multiculturalism, identity, globalization and supranationalism have become prevalent matters of political contestation (Ignazi 2003, 20). Far-right parties fuel political discourse with Islamophobia, xenophobia, and outright racism in a capacity that mainstream parties are unable to, making their position on these issues relevant for established parties if they are to compete in the political landscape (Rippeyoung 2007, 381; Meyer and Rosenberger 2015, 2). The increasing success of far-right parties has sparked debate about the future stability of Western European democracies as well as issues related to multiculturalism and the integration of different immigrant communities which makes it a timely research topic. 1 Cleavage theory, developed by Lipset and Rokkan in 1967, provides a frame of reference to understand political contestation and how parties react to societal cleavages or conflicts that emerged from industrial revolutions in Europe. The theory is useful in understanding not only how these cleavages came to form, but also how challenger parties, such as the far-right, stake their claim in the existing political structure in response to new lines of conflict regarding post- material values. In recent years, political scientists have observed the emergence of a new transnational cleavage based largely on cultural issues that has shaped competition between parties in the 21st century. Far-right parties fit into this new line of conflict by taking hold of this transnational cleavage and challenging existing parties on these cultural issues. However, the emergence and subsequent success of far-right parties and their ability to compete along this new cleavage varies greatly across Europe. This begs the question – if European countries in the 1970s were experiencing the same social phenomena with similar transformations in the dimensions structuring the political space, why do these parties become firmly rooted in the political landscape in some countries while they have limited success in others? The far-right party family is complex and research has been devoted to not only classifying where these parties stand on issues, but understanding their bases of support and how they fit into the existing political structure of contestation. In order to address how these parties came to be successful, a large portion of previous research has focused on national case studies or large cross-national comparisons. In looking at various countries at once, important country- specific factors such as history or culture are not given the attention they deserve, which limits the results. While worthwhile for extracting general conclusions, these national case studies emphasize important factors in one particular context but report the same factors as unimportant 2 in others (Norris 2005, 9). In order to overcome these shortcomings, the cases focus on France and Germany. While France has been the prototype for the far-right in Europe since the 1980s, Germany has not had a successful contender until 2017. Thus, my research will fill a gap in the literature by focusing on a controlled systematic comparative analysis of two case countries. This narrow focus will illuminate the complexities of the far-right party family and shed insight into the history of these parties in both countries as well as the differences
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany: Baffled Hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller
    POLICY BRIEF Germany: Baffled hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, Germany has transformed into a hegemonic power in Europe, but recent global upheaval will test the country’s leadership and the strength of its democracy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY are challenging Europe’s cohesion aggressively, as does the Trump administration’s “America First” The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 turned reunified policy. The impact of this on Germany is stark. No Germany into Europe’s hegemon. But with signs of country in Europe is affected so dramatically by this a major global downturn on the horizon, Germany new systemic competition. Far from being a “shaper again finds itself at the fulcrum of great power nation,” Germany risks being shaped: by events, competition and ideological struggle in Europe. And competitors, challengers, and adversaries. German democracy is being challenged as never before, by internal and external adversaries. Germany’s options are limited. It needs to preserve Europe’s vulnerable ecosystem in its own The greatest political challenge to liberal democracy enlightened self-interest. It will have to compromise within Germany today is the Alternative für on some issues (defense expenditures, trade Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, or AfD), the surpluses, energy policy). But it will also have to first far-right party in the country’s postwar history push back against Russian or Chinese interference, to be represented in all states and in the federal and make common cause with fellow liberal legislature. While it polls nationally at 12 percent, its democracies. With regard to Trump’s America, disruptive impact has been real.
    [Show full text]
  • Protest and State–Society Relations in the Middle East and North Africa
    SIPRI Policy Paper PROTEST AND STATE– 56 SOCIETY RELATIONS IN October 2020 THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA dylan o’driscoll, amal bourhrous, meray maddah and shivan fazil STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Ambassador Jan Eliasson, Chair (Sweden) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Espen Barth Eide (Norway) Jean-Marie Guéhenno (France) Dr Radha Kumar (India) Ambassador Ramtane Lamamra (Algeria) Dr Patricia Lewis (Ireland/United Kingdom) Dr Jessica Tuchman Mathews (United States) DIRECTOR Dan Smith (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 72 Solna, Sweden Telephone: + 46 8 655 9700 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sipri.org Protest and State– Society Relations in the Middle East and North Africa SIPRI Policy Paper No. 56 dylan o’driscoll, amal bourhrous, meray maddah and shivan fazil October 2020 © SIPRI 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of SIPRI or as expressly permitted by law. Contents Preface v Acknowledgements vi Summary vii Abbreviations ix 1. Introduction 1 Figure 1.1. Classification of countries in the Middle East and North Africa by 2 protest intensity 2. State–society relations in the Middle East and North Africa 5 Mass protests 5 Sporadic protests 16 Scarce protests 31 Highly suppressed protests 37 Figure 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 SCCA Roadrally Rules
    Rule Book 2021 Edition SCCA® Rally Department 6620 SE Dwight Dr. Topeka, KS 66619 www.scca.com Copyright 2021 by the Sports Car Club of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior permission of the publisher. Updated January 1, 2021 Published by: Sports Car Club of America, Inc. 6620 SE Dwight Dr. Topeka, KS 66619 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT STATEMENT 8 FOREWORD 10 ARTICLE 1 OFFICIALS 11 A) SCCA RoadRally Board (RRB) 11 B) SCCA Rally Department 11 C) Delegation of Powers 11 ARTICLE 2 RoadRally RULES AND RULES FOR ORGANIZERS 12 A) National RoadRally Rules 12 B) Rules for Organizers 12 C) Revision of RRRs and RFOs 12 D) RoadRally Rules applicable to different levels of events 12 E) Safety Pre-check 12 ARTICLE 3 ACCEPTANCE OF RRRs AND RFOs 13 A) By the Rally Committee 13 B) By the Contestant 13 ARTICLE 4 SCCA-SANCTION 13 A) Definition of an SCCA RoadRally 13 B) Duration 13 C) Application for Sanction 14 ARTICLE 5 ANNOUNCEMENT TO MEMBERSHIP 15 A) General Announcement 15 B) Special Announcements 15 C) Announcement of Accommodations and Meals 15 ARTICLE 6 OFFICIAL OBSERVER 15 A) Designation and Eligibility of Observer 15 B) Duties of the Observer 15 ARTICLE 7 RALLY AWARDS 16 A) Class Trophies 16 B) Supplementary Trophies 16 ARTICLE 8 ANNUAL RoadRally CHAMPIONSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Eastern Germany's Far-Right Intellectuals I EUROPP
    16.02.2021 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals I EUROPP Q Biog Team February 11 th, 2020 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals O comments Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On 5 February, Thomas Kemmerich of the FreeDemocratic Party {FDP) was elected as Minister President of Thuringia with thehelp of the Alternative for Germany {AfD). Sabine Volk explains that the incident, which has generated a heated reaction in Germany, highlights the role of far-right groups in shaping public debate in eastern Germany. Following the AfD's coup in Thuringia and the resulting political earthquake in German party politics, eastern Germany has once again moved into the spotlight of national debates on rising far-right populism. I have recently conducted research in the region, where far- https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/02/11/introducing-eastern-germanys-far-right-intellectuals/ 1/8 16.02.2021 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals I EUROPP right subcultures have been able to establish themselves, providing a platform for far-right debate and networking. Once in a blue moon, a public bus goes to Schnellroda, a tiny township in the eastern German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt. About fifty kilometres from Saxony's buzzing student city of Leipzig, and some thirty kilometres away from the city of Halle, the location of an anti­ Semitic terrorist attack in October last year, this remote place is the embodiment of 'the middle of nowhere'. Yet, Germany's far-right scene usually spares no effort to gather in Schnellroda. It is here that Germany's leading far-right intellectual, Gotz Kubitschek, his so-called Institute for State Politics (lfS), and his publishing house Antaiosreside.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • ISS Forum 20
    H-Diplo | ISSF Forum, No. 20 (2019) issforum.org Forum Editors: Michael C. Behrent and Diane Labrosse Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Introduction by Michael C. Behrent H-Diplo/ISSF Policy Forum on the 2019 European Elections Published on 7 June 2019 Permalink: http://issforum.org/forums/europe-2019 Shortlink: http://tiny.cc/ISSF-Forum-20 PDF URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Forum-20.pdf Contents Introduction by Michael C. Behrent, Appalachian State University ....................................... 2 Essay by Eszter Babarczy, Moholy-Nagy University of Art (Budapest) ................................... 6 Essay by Olivier Costa, CNRS, Sciences Po (Bordeaux), Collège d’Europe (Bruges) ............... 8 Essay by Olivier Costa, CNRS, Sciences Po (Bordeaux), Collège d’Europe (Bruges) Translated for H-Diplo by Michael C. Behrent ....................................................................... 12 Essay by Laura Fasanaro, Roma Tre University (Rome) ......................................................... 16 Essay by Till van Rahden, Université de Montréal ................................................................. 21 © Copyright 2019 The Authors | H-Diplo/ISSF Forum 20 (2019) Introduction by Michael C. Behrent, Appalachian State University lections to the European Parliament are in many respects the ugly duckling of the European election cycle. They lack the obvious importance and immediate repercussions of presidential and parliamentary elections, yet they undeniably embody the core of the European ideal, even in its Ecurrent battered and beleaguered state. The European Parliament’s 751 members are, after all, directly elected by the European Union’s 500 million citizens. In recent decades, the Parliament’s role in the EU’s institutional architecture has deepened, giving members a prominent role in drafting legislation and approving the EU’s budget. Yet the Parliament’s rising stature has not been matched by equal levels of public awareness of its role.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation and Global Power in A
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Senior Theses International Studies Spring 5-19-2018 Representation and Global Power in a Multicultural Germany: A Discourse Analysis of the German Response(s) to the Presence of Syrian Refugees Kyle William Zarif Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/international_senior Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Zarif, Kyle William, "Representation and Global Power in a Multicultural Germany: A Discourse Analysis of the German Response(s) to the Presence of Syrian Refugees" (2018). Senior Theses. 7. https://fordham.bepress.com/international_senior/7 This is brought to you for free and open access by the International Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! Representation and Global Power in a Multicultural Germany A Discourse Analysis of the German Response(s) to the Presence of Syrian Refugees ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyle Zarif Fordham University International Studies Program Global Affairs Track Thesis Seminar Professor: Dr. Hill Krishnan Primary Advisor: Dr. Hugo Benavides Email: [email protected] ! ! ! ! Zarif !1 ! Table of Contents! 1. Introduction I. Thesis Statement and Research Questions ......2 II. [Muslim] Refugees: A Great Challenge [for Germany and Europe] ......3 III. The EU and Syria: Framing the German Approach to Refugees ......5 IV. Cultural Politics and the Stigmatization of European Muslims ......8 V. Implications for Syrian Refugees ......10 !VI. Relevant Theory: Discourse(s), Knowledge and Global Power ......11 3. Syrian Refugees in the Mainstream German Media I.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POPULIST RADICAL RIGHT in WESTERN EUROPE ELISABETH IVARSFLATEN and FRØY GUDBRANDSEN
    THE POPULIST RADICAL RIGHT IN WESTERN EUROPE ELISABETH IVARSFLATEN and FRØY GUDBRANDSEN Populist radical right parties have become influential actors on electoral support has remained stable, at around 13%. The the political stage in several Western European democracies. Dansk Folkeparti’s programme centres on the public’s fears of Gaining votes mainly from the mid-1980s and onwards, they Denmark becoming a multi-ethnic society, and emphasizes the represent the most recent party family to have appeared on the need to protect the Danish language and culture. Through its political map of Western Europe. The populist radical right close co-operation with the Government, the Dansk Folkeparti parties group is more diverse than other party families in the has been particularly influential in this policy area. Other region, as it includes organizations that have clearly different central areas of issue for the party are care for the elderly and backgrounds and origins. The current unifying factors shared Euroscepticism. by the various populist radical right parties in programmatic Sweden: Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden Democrats) terms, are their calls for restrictions on immigration and on the ethnic, cultural, and religious diversification of Western Eur- At the Swedish general election of September 2010 Sverige- opean societies, and the high priority that they assign to these demokraterna passed the requisite electoral threshold for the political issues. first time when it won 5.7% of the vote and thus gained 20 seats Parties campaigning to be tough on immigration and immi- in the legislature. Compared to the radical right-wing parties grant-origin minorities have emerged and have contested in the neighbouring Nordic countries, its share of the vote is elections in all Western European countries, but they have small.
    [Show full text]
  • Automobiles De Collection La Vente D’Été
    AUTOMOBILES DE COLLECTION LA VENTE D’ÉTÉ Dimanche 20 juin 2021 CONTACTS POUR CETTE VENTE Directeur de département Spécialiste Gautier Rossignol Hugo Baldy +33 (0)1 47 45 93 01 +33 (0)1 47 45 93 01 +33 (0)6 16 91 42 28 +33 (0)7 60 78 10 18 [email protected] [email protected] Spécialiste Administratrice Paul-Emile Coignet Clothilde Duval +33 (0)4 37 24 24 23 +33 (0)1 47 45 91 53 +33 (0)6 68 36 26 22 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Consultant Directeur du Pôle Raphaël de Serres Art de vivre & Collections +33 (0)6 07 18 64 83 [email protected] Philippine Dupré la Tour Enchères par téléphone Relations presse Ordre d’achat Sébastien Fernandes [email protected] +33 (0)1 47 45 93 05 [email protected] Relations acheteurs +33 (0)4 37 24 24 22 [email protected] Président Claude Aguttes SAS Claude Aguttes (SVV 2002-209) Associés Directeurs associés Commissaires-priseurs habilités Philippine Dupré la Tour Claude Aguttes, Sophie Perrine Charlotte Aguttes- Reynier SELARL Aguttes & Perrine Associés Commissaire-priseur judiciaire Sophie Perrine, Gautier Rossignol, Maximilien Aguttes Vente aux enchères Dimanche 20 juin 2021, 15h Aguttes Neuilly Exposition publique Espace Charenton 327 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris Vendredi 18 juin : 12h-18h Samedi 19 juin : 10h-18h Dimanche 20 juin : 9h-12h (sur rendez-vous) Les mesures liées à la crise sanitaire sont susceptibles de changer. Nous vous invitons à consulter régulièrement aguttes.com afin de prendre connaissance des changements quant à l’organisation de l’exposition et/ou la date de la vente aux enchères.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    THE POLITICS OF ELECTORAL REFORM IN FRANCOPHONE WEST AFRICA: THE BIRTH AND CHANGE OF ELECTORAL RULES IN MALI, NIGER, AND SENEGAL By MAMADOU BODIAN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Mamadou Bodian To my late father, Lansana Bodian, for always believing in me ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want first to thank and express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Leonardo A. Villalón, who has been a great mentor and good friend. He has believed in me and prepared me to get to this place in my academic life. The pursuit of a degree in political science would not be possible without his support. I am also grateful to my committee members: Bryon Moraski, Michael Bernhard, Daniel A. Smith, Lawrence Dodd, and Fiona McLaughlin for generously offering their time, guidance and good will throughout the preparation and review of this work. This dissertation grew in the vibrant intellectual atmosphere provided by the University of Florida. The Department of Political Science and the Center for African Studies have been a friendly workplace. It would be impossible to list the debts to professors, students, friends, and colleagues who have incurred during the long development and the writing of this work. Among those to whom I am most grateful are Aida A. Hozic, Ido Oren, Badredine Arfi, Kevin Funk, Sebastian Sclofsky, Oumar Ba, Lina Benabdallah, Amanda Edgell, and Eric Lake. I am also thankful to fellow Africanists: Emily Hauser, Anna Mwaba, Chesney McOmber, Nic Knowlton, Ashley Leinweber, Steve Lichty, and Ann Wainscott.
    [Show full text]