DOCSLIB.ORG

California Zephyr®

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR® CHICAGO and SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Effective January 11, 2016 CHICAGO - BURLINGTON - OMAHA DENVER - GLENWOOD SPRINGS SALT LAKE CITY - RENO SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA and intermediate stations 1-800-USA-RAIL www.amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. NRPC Form P5–125M–1/11/16R Stock #02-3622. Schedules subject to change without notice. CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR 5 Train Number 6 CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR ROUTE MAP and SYMBOLS Daily Normal Days of Operation Daily R s r R s r On Board Service y l O y l O Emeryville,Martinez, CA Sacramento, CA Colfax, CA CAReno, NVElko, NVProvo, UTGreen River,Glenwood UT Fraser-Winter Springs,Fort CO Morgan, Park,Holdrege, CO COLincoln, NE NECreston, Ottumwa,IA Burlington, IA Princeton, IA Chicago, IL IL , UT CO Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up ville, CA cca, NV ver, CO Davis, CAe ruckee, CA Helper Granby, Den tings, NE Osceola, IA Richmond, CA Ros T McCook,Has NE Omaha, NE Galesburg,Naperville, IL IL l2 00P 0Dpp Chicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l2 50P WinnemuSalt Lake City, UTGrand Junction, CO Mount Pleasant, IA R2 34P 28 Naperville, IL (METRA/BN Line) ∑v- D1 53P 3 44P 104 Princeton, IL >v D12 33P l4 38P 162 Galesburg, IL -S. Seminary St. &¶ ∑w- lD11 41A 5 25P 205 Burlington, IA >v 10 36A l5 59P 233 Mount Pleasant, IA ∑v l9 54A CHICAGO EMEEMERYVILLERY 6 53P 279 Ottumwa, IA ∑v 9 09A 8 09P 359 Osceola, IA (Des Moines) >v- 7 40A 8 41P 392 Creston, IA >v 7 04A l10 55P 500 Ar Omaha, NE ∑v Dp l5 14A l11 05P Dp Ar l4 59A l12 08A 555 Ar Lincoln, NE ∑v Dp l3 26A l l California Zephyr® 12 14A Dpp Ar 3 20A Other Amtrak Train Routes l1 47A 652 Hastings, NE (Grand Island) >v l1 42A 2 34A 706 Holdrege, NE >v 12 54A 3 43A 783 McCook, NE (CT) >v 11 49P SYMBOLS KEY >v 5 05A 960 Fort Morgan, CO (Sterling) (MT) 8 25P > l ∑w l D Stops only to discharge passengers; Unstaffed station 7 15A 1038 Ar Denver, CO–Union Station Dp 7 10P train may leave before time shown. ∑ Staffed ticket office; may or may l8 05A Dp b Colorado Springs, Raton, Vail, Ar l6 38P Salida, Gunnison—see back R Stops only to receive passengers. not be open for all train departures >w CT Central time ⅥC Host station. See below. 10 07A 1100 Fraser-Winter Park, CO 3 50P w 10 37A 1113 Granby, CO (Rocky Mt. Nat’l. Park) >v 3 12P MT Mountain time Station wheelchair accessible; no l1 53P 1223 Glenwood Springs, CO (Aspen) ∑v l12 10P PT Pacific time barriers between station and train b v Station wheelchair accessible; not l4 10P 1311 Grand Junction, CO ∑w l10 23A Bus stop - Quik-Trak self-serve ticketing kiosk all station facilities accessible 5 58P 1417 Green River, UT >v 7 59A 7 20P 1488 Helper, UT (Price) >v 6 37A 9 26P 1563 Provo, UT >w 4 35A l11 05P 1608 Ar Salt Lake City, UT (MT) ∑w Dp l3 30A l11 30P Dp b Ogden, Boise, Las Vegas Ar l3 05A Service on the California Zephyr® —see back >w R Coaches: Reservations required. 3 03A 1871 Elko, NV (PT) 9 31P s 5 40A 2013 Winnemucca, NV >v 7 08P Sleeping cars: Superliner sleeping accommodations. - Amtrak Metropolitan Lounge available in Chicago for Sleeping car l8 36A 2202 Reno, NV ∑w- l4 06P passengers. 9 37A 2237 Truckee, CA (Lake Tahoe) >v 2 38P r Dining: Full meal service. 11 48A 2301 Colfax, CA >v 12 21P y >w- Sightseer Lounge: Sand wiches, snacks and beverages. 12 57P 2336 Roseville, CA 11 35A On Board Guide Program: California State Railroad Museum narrators lD2 13P 2353 Sacramento, CA ⅥC ∑w- l11 09A l Ⅵ∑w- l pro vide historical and sightseeing commentary between Reno and D2 44P 2367 Davis, CA C 10 36A Sacramento. Program and schedule is subject to change. l Ⅵ∑w- l D3 26P 2411 Martinez, CA (San Joaquins Trains) C 9 54A l Checked baggage at select stations. >v- D3 59P 2430 Richmond, CA 9 22A O Trains 5 and 6: trainside checked bicycle service offered between staffed l4 10P 2438 Ar Emeryville, CA (PT) ⅥC ∑w- Dp l9 10A b locations handling checked baggage. Customers will check in with the San Francisco—see back station agent, get a claim check/baggage tag for their bike, and hand up to SCHEDULES EFFECTIVE 1/11/16R a crew member inside the baggage car. &¶ Executive Transportation operates Thruway van service from Springfield, IL for con nec tions from Train 22 to Trains 3 and 5 at Galesburg, IL and SHADING KEY from Galesburg, IL for connections from Trains 4 and 6 to Train 21 at Springfield, IL. Passengers with disabilities must provide advance Overnight train notification of needs. For additional information call (217) 523-5466. All Amtrak services and stations are non-smoking. Connecting Local Services Trails and Rails Program: In cooperation with the National Park Service, volunteer rangers provide on board narratives between May and September Metropolitan Denver on selected days on parts of this route. Visit nps.gov/trailsandrails and At Denver Union Station, the Regional Transportation District (RTD) amtraktoparks.com. offers frequent light rail and bus service: • Western/Southern suburbs via light rail, • Boulder/Longmont/Northern suburbs via express coach service, Ⅵ California Station Hosts • Denver International Airport via SkyRide express coach service, C • Free shuttles connect Union Station along the 16th Street The Station Host Association of California is a volunteer organization Pedestrian Mall to the Civic Center Station. that assists rail passengers, meeting and greeting them at eleven Call (303) 299-6000 or check www.rtd-denver.com for more California stations, and helping them with schedules, boarding, and information. general inquiries. For more information, visit www.stationhost.org or call (925) 457-9018. Salt Lake City and Environs The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) serves Utah County, Salt Lake City, Ogden, Provo and intermediate stops with FrontRunner commuter rail, bus routes, ski buses and four TRAX light rail lines. Call 801-RIDE-UTA (743-3882) or visit www.rideuta.com. Thruway Bus Connections Denver • Colorado Springs • Raton (Greyhound Lines) 5 6 Connecting Train Number 6 8305 8306 Thruway Number 8406 Daily Daily Mile Days of Operation Symbol Daily Denver, CO (MT) 12 20A 0 Dp –Greyhound Station > Ar 6 15P 7 30P Dp –Union Station ∑w Ar 6 05P 8 55P 1 50A 70 Ar Colorado Springs, CO > Dp 4 40P 10 00P 2 50A 112 Ar Pueblo, CO > Dp 3 50P 218 Ar Raton, NM –Amtrak Sta.(MT) >v Dp 1 35P Denver • Vail (Greyhound Lines) 8805 Thruway Number 8706 Daily Mile Days of Operation Symbol Daily Denver, CO (MT) 12 15P 0Dp –Greyhound Station > Ar 0Dp –Union Station ∑w Ar 6 10P 2 00P 71 Ar Frisco, CO > Dp 4 30P 2 35P 100 Ar Vail, CO (MT) > Dp 3 55P Denver • Salida • Gunnison • Alamosa (Express Arrow–en route transfers may be necessary) 5 Connecting Train Number 6 8605 Thruway Number 8606 Daily Mile Days of Operation Symbol Daily 1 45P 0DpDenver, CO–Greyhound Sta. (MT) > Ar 11 00A 1 55P 0Dp –Union Station ∑w Ar 10 50A 2 35P 39 Ar Pine, CO – RTD Park-n-Ride Lot > Dp 10 05A 3 40P 85 Fairplay, CO > 8 55A 4 30P 120 Buena Vista, CO > 8 15A 5 00P 144 Salida, CO > 7 45A 5 15P 149 Poncha Springs, CO > 7 25A 6 05P 160 Moffat, CO > 7 45A 6 30P 209 Gunnison, CO–Bus Station > 6 20A 6 35P 210 –Western State University > 6 15A 6 40P 226 Ar Alamosa, CO (MT) > Dp 6 05A Salt Lake City • Las Vegas (Greyhound Lines) 8453 Thruway Number8458 8456 Daily Mile Days of Operation Symbol Daily Daily 8 30A 0 Dp Salt Lake City, UT (MT) > Ar 6 50A 5 05P –Greyhound Station 9 25A 45 Ar Provo, UT >w Dp 5 55A 4 10P 2 25P 304 Ar St. George, UT (MT) > Dp 1 10A 11 30A 3 40P 422 Ar Las Vegas, NV (PT) > Dp 10 00P 7 55A –Greyhound Station Boise • Twin Falls • Ogden • Salt Lake City (Greyhound Lines) 6 Connecting Train Number 5 8447 8441 Thruway Number 8446 8440 Daily Daily Mile Days of Operation Symbol Daily Daily 10 20A 11 15P 0DpBoise, ID (MT) > Ar 7 00A 7 45P –Greyhound Station 1 10P 1 35A 128 Twin Falls, ID > 4 40A 5 00P –Oasis Stop N Go 4 55P 5 20A 316 Ogden, UT > 12 50A 1 10P –Greyhound Station 5 40P 6 05A 353 Ar Salt Lake City, UT (MT) > Dp 12 05A 12 15P –Greyhound Station Emeryville • San Francisco 5005 Mile Thruway Number Symbol 5006 #§l4 25P 0DpEmeryville, CA–Amtrak Station (PT) ⅥC ∑w- Ar l8 25A San Francisco, CA b D5 15P 2Ar –Financial District, Hyatt Regency >v Dp R7 40A lD5 00P 9Ar –Transbay Temporary Terminal ⅥC ∑w- Dp lR7 50A D5 35P 10 Ar –Fisherman’s Wharf, Pier 39 >v Dp R7 15A #§ Direct transfer between train and bus at Amtrak station for connect ing passengers only. See other side for Shading Key, Route Map and Symbols..
Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.

  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019

    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
  • 40Thanniv Ersary

    40Thanniv Ersary

    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
  • Senate Bill Policy Committee Analysis

    Senate Bill Policy Committee Analysis

    SJR 30 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 23, 2018 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION Jim Frazier, Chair SJR 30 (McGuire) – As Introduced August 9, 2018 SENATE VOTE: 33-0 SUBJECT: Amtrak National Network. SUMMARY: Urges the Congress and the President of the United States to support the retention of, and investment in, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) National Network of passenger trains and for Congress to reject the President’s proposed budget cuts to Amtrak. Specifically, this resolution: 1) Makes findings and declarations including the history of Amtrak in the United States and its importance to the State of California that WHEREAS: a) Amtrak was created in 1970 to assume the common carriers’ obligations of the private railroads and provide intercity passenger rail service throughout the United States; and, b) Amtrak’s mission is to deliver intercity transportation that helps move people, the economy, and the nation forward; and, c) Amtrak operates a nationwide rail network, serving more than 500 destinations in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and three Canadian provinces, in addition to serving as a contractor in various capacities for several commuter rail agencies; and, d) Amtrak National Network trains are often the only form of public transportation available to thousands of small communities nationwide, and are a vital link between urban and rural America; and, e) The State of California has a vested interest in the continued success of the local and national Amtrak network as it is home to three of the
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations

    Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations

    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
  • Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL Corridorticket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67%

    Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL Corridorticket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67%

    Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL CORRIDORTicket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67% Ticket WithWelcome FY2019, the Capitol Corridor Aboard! celebrated five straight years of Type record-breaking ridership and revenue, with a new all-time high of 10-RIDE 1,777,136 riders and $38.03 million in revenue. ThisWORK/ growth is reflected 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% REC/in the FareboxFRIENDS Ratio, which reached a previously unattained 60%. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% 12% ROUND-TRIP/ To build upon this success, and to ensure the Capitol Corridor’s place as ONE-WAY a premier travel choice, the CCJPA is making progress on infrastructure 50% improvements, safety upgrades, customer service enhancements, MONTHLY and service expansion projects. These efforts aim to maintain Capitol 32% Corridor as a quality, convenient,OTHER 1% cost-effective, and flexibleFAMILY/ option for REC/ FRIENDS years to come. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% Rider Profile Ticket Type 12% SHOP/VACATION 2% WORK/ BUSINESS 21 Years of Improvement* 67% SERVICE REVENUE-TO- LEVEL RIDERSHIP REVENUE COST RATIO +275% +284% +508% +100% Rider Customer Satisfaction Profile 10-RIDE WORK/ 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 REC/ FYFRIENDS 2019 30 DAILY 1,777,136SCHOOL 3% $38.03MLEISURE 60%15% TRAINS 12% ROUND-TRIP/ ONE-WAY 50% MONTHLY 90% 87% 90% 91% 89% 89% 87% 89% 88% 85% 90% 32% OTHER 1% FAMILY/ FY 1998 REC/ FRIENDS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SCHOOL 3% 2018 2019 (PRE-CCJPA) FY 1998 FY 1998 FY 1998 LEISURE 15% 8 DAILY (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) SHOP/VACATION 2% 12% TRAINS 463,000 $6.25M 30% *CCJPA assumed management of the service in 1998.

  • 15% Student Discount

    WITH OUR STUDENT DISCOUNT YOUR CONNECTION TO HOME, TO SCHOOL, TO CALIFORNIA SAN FRANC IS CO SA CRA ME NT O YOS E 1. Visit AmtrakSanJoaquins.com 2. Select “Adult” in the “Passenger Type.” 3. Use discount code V353. 4. Relax and enjoy your trip! HOW TO BOOK Redwood National Park McKinleyville Arcata Eureka Redding Lassen Volcanic Fortuna National Park Rio Dell/Scotia Red Blu Garberville Leggett Laytonville Chico Oroville Reno Sparks Willits Truckee Capitol Marysville Ukiah Corridor Roseville Colfax Lake Tahoe Stateline Cloverdale Auburn South Lake Tahoe Healdsburg Rocklin Santa Rosa Davis Placerville Rohnert Park Sacramento Petaluma Faireld/ Elk Napa Suisun Grove Rio Vista Vallejo Lodi Mono Richmond Martinez Lake Berkeley Stockton (ACE) Antioch Stockton Yosemite Emeryville El Portal National Oakland Lathrop/Manteca Park San Francisco Tracy Midpines Hayward Livermore Modesto Fremont Pleasanton Santa Clara San Jose Turlock/ Fishcamp Denair Mariposa Oakhurst Morgan Hill Merced Coarsegold Scotts Valley Gilroy Kings Madera Summer Canyon Santa Cruz Only Route National Prunedale Park Fresno Death Valley Seaside Salinas Sequoia National Park Monterey National Carmel Hanford Park Visalia King City Lemoore Amtrak Transfer Station Goshen Junction (Train/Bus connections) Kettleman Sta ed Amtrak Station City Corcoran Unsta ed Station Paso Robles Wasco Amtrak Thruway Bus Route Atascadero San Bakerseld Other Amtrak Route San Luis Obispo Joaquins® Tehachapi To Lasé Vegas Grover Beach Mojave Guadalupe Santa Maria Barstow Buellton Lancaster Surf Solvang
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Board Meeting

    San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Board Meeting

    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Jose Nuño, City of Manteca Commissioner, Melissa Hernandez, Alameda County Commissioner, Lily Mei, City of Fremont Commissioner, Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING June 4, 2021 – 8:00 am Call-In Information: +1 (646) 749-3122 Access Code: 185-391-325 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (646) 749- 3122 with access code: 185-391-325 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
  • Mark Williams' Presentation California Zephyr

    Mark Williams' Presentation California Zephyr

    Three Railroads 2532 Miles Of Gorgeous Scenery Five Vista Domes The Most Talked About Train In America... Silver Thread to The West The History of the California Zephyr March 20, 1949 -March 20, 1970 Beginnings 1934 Pioneer Zephyr Streamlined Ralph Budd (CBQ) meets Edward Budd (Budd Corp.) Stainless steel and shotwelding Wildly successful = willing to take risks Beginnings Exposition Flyer – 1939 First through car train for CB&Q/DRGW/WP “Scheduling for Scenery” Dotsero Cutoff / Moffat Tunnel Traded time & distance for scenic beauty CZ Fun Fact #1 Beginnings 1940 Joint Meeting 1943 Informal Discussions Post-war RR's Awash With $ October 1945 Joint Contract First orders to Budd 1945 Revisions in 1946 & 1947 First deliveries 1948 Beginnings 1944 Cyrus Osborn's (General manager of EMD) grand idea 1944 trip Glenwood Canyon The Dome Car is born by rebuilding a standard Budd chair car (originally Silvery Alchemy) CZ Fun Fact #2 Dividing The Cost And Costs were dividedProfits by percentage of CZ route mileage (the Exposition Flyer route) CB&Q = 41% DRGW = 22% WP = 37% Profits were divided by percentage of short line route (the Overland Route), which cost WP 10% compared to CB&Q and DRGW share Dividing The Cost And Profits CB&Q owned 27 cars DRGW owned 15 cars WP owned 24 cars PRR leased 1 car Planning Menus Timing Governed by need to have the train in the Rockies and Feather River Canyon during daylight Layover time for through car was a casualty Staffing The Zephyrettes CZ Fun Fact #3 The Zephyrettes Planning
  • Host Railroad Report Card &

    Host Railroad Report Card &

    Host Railroad Report Card & FAQ 1) What is a “host railroad”? Most of Amtrak’s network is on tracks owned, maintained, and dispatched by highly-profitable freight railroads, known as “host” railroads where Amtrak uses their tracks. Most of the trains on these rail lines are the freight railroads’ own freight trains. Because the freight railroads make all dispatching decisions about which trains have priority in using the rail line, the freight railroads have a tremendous amount of influence over Amtrak’s operations on their lines. Prior to Amtrak’s creation in 1971, the privately-owned railroads had a common carrier obligation to operate passenger trains themselves – an obligation that dated back to when the railroads were built in the 1800s. Because the railroads were losing money on their passenger trains, Congress created Amtrak and relieved the private railroads of their obligation to operate passenger trains. A very important part of the deal was that Amtrak would still have access to the railroads’ lines in order to operate passenger trains. Every year Amtrak pays host railroads $142 million for using their tracks and other resources needed to operate Amtrak trains. 2) What distinguishes hosts with good Amtrak performance? Hosts typically achieve good Amtrak performance through a combination of: a) Commitment to providing quality service for Amtrak’s passengers, b) An active partnership with Amtrak, where both sides work cooperatively and the hosts respect Federal law which protects the rights of our nation’s passengers, and c) A well-disciplined operation that benefits both Amtrak and freight customers alike. 3) What does “Delays per 10,000 train miles” mean? It is a measure of how much delay each host railroad causes to Amtrak trains.