DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Nova Gorica Laboratory for Environmental Research Vipavska 13, POB 301 5001 Nova Gorica, Slovenia Project: Transec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Nova Gorica Laboratory for Environmental Research Vipavska 13, POB 301 5001 Nova Gorica, Slovenia Project: Transec University of Nova Gorica Laboratory for Environmental Research Vipavska 13, POB 301 5001 Nova Gorica, Slovenia Project: Transeconet IDENTITIES AND STRATEGIES – RAISING AWARNESS WP6.1 Report Perception of Landscape Changes Authors: Gregor Torkar and Romina Rodela Nova Gorica, 2011 Abstract: This report aims to map out local peoples’ perception of landscape changes in the Pomurje region. To this end it reports on the historical and recent perception of landscape change, on the main processes driving landscape changes, but also it reports on people perceptions about Pomurje as a cross-border area, and on knowledge people have about the ecological networks. Qualitative data informs us that a combination of geomorphologic, socioeconomic, cultural, and historic factors have shaped the Pomurje landscape and have influenced land use patterns in the region. As from respondents’ narratives the emergence of agricultural modernization and policy trends, present in the country after the World War II, appear to have most influenced the landscape and the rural lifestyle in Pomurje. Of a particular relevance are the impacts that the state border (its closure/openness) had on local development dynamics. Key words: ecological networks, perception of landscape change, landscape, Pomurje region Povzetek: V poro čilu predstavljamo, kako lokalni prebivalci Pomurske regije zaznavajo spremembe v kulturni krajini. V poro čilu poro čamo o njihovem zaznavanju preteklega in današnjega stanja v krajini ter o glavnih dejavnikih, ki spreminjajo krajino. V poro čilu tudi predstavljamo, kako ljudje zaznavajo Pomurje v povezavi s čezmejnimi obmo čji, ter njihovo poznavanje in razumevanje ekoloških mrež. Pridobljeni kvalitativni podatki kažejo na kombinacijo geomorfoloških, socioekonomskih, kulturnih in zgodovinskih dejavnikov, ki so oblikovali krajino v Pomurju in vplivali na vzorce rabe prostora v regiji. Iz pri čevanj intervjuvancev ugotavljamo, da sta modernizacija kmetijstva in politi čne razmere po drugi svetovni vojni najbolj vplivale na trenutno podobo krajine in življenjske razmere v Pomurju. Posebej zanimivi so obsežni vplivi zaprtosti/odprtosti državnih meja na dinamike lokalnega razvoja. Klju čne besede: ekološke mreže, percepcija spremeb pokrajine, kulturna krajina, Pomurje This document reports on the research activities undertaken by the University of Nova Gorica (PP 14) for the Workpackage 6: Identities and Strategies, under the TransEcoNet project. The TransEcoNet project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme and co-financed by the ERDF. 2 Table of Contents 1.INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 1.1. RESEARCH AREA : POMURJE REGION .............................................................................. 5 2. METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................. 9 2.1. QUESTIONNAIRE ........................................................................................................... 9 2.2. SAMPLING .................................................................................................................... 9 3. SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS WITH DISCUSSION ......................................................13 3.1. PRESENT STATE AND IMPACTS ON THE LANDSCAPE........................................................13 3.1.1. The unique characteristics of the landscape making it different from the surrounding landscapes................................................................................................13 3.1.2. The prides, the precious component of the landscape ........................................15 3.1.3. The existing landscape degradations, negative landscape elements and influences .....................................................................................................................16 3.1.4. The urban parks and cemeteries in the area.......................................................16 3.1.5. The gardens in the area......................................................................................17 3.1.6. Major landscape elements, which have positive or negative impact on the nature .....................................................................................................................................18 3.1.7. Environmental problems in the area....................................................................19 3.1.8. The concept of ecological networks ....................................................................20 3.2. FORMER STATE AND CHANGES OF THE LANDSCAPE ........................................................20 3.2.1. Tales, stories, myths connected to the landscape...............................................21 3.2.2. Traditions, having the message of the respect and protection of nature/landscape .....................................................................................................................................22 3.2.3. Main changes in the agriculture ..........................................................................22 3.2.4. Changes in the forest and the forestry ................................................................24 3.2.5 Changes in fishing and hunting............................................................................24 3.2.6. Changes in the tourism .......................................................................................25 3.2.7 Changes in the traffic and infrastructure of the area.............................................25 3.2.8. Changes in the character of the settlements and buildings .................................27 3.2.9. Changes in the industrial activities ......................................................................28 3 3.2.10. Nature conservation activity in the area ............................................................28 3.2.11. The landscape affected changes in the future...................................................29 3.2.12. The ideal landscape..........................................................................................30 3.3. COMPARISON OF THE SITUATION ON THE BOTH SIDE OF THE STATE BORDER ....................30 3.3.1. Common landscape elements and differences;...................................................31 3.3.2. The border-line and the effect of the border on the landscape changes..............32 4. CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................................................34 LIST OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................35 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................36 REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................37 APPENDIX I: VPRAŠALNIK (QUESTIONNAIRE IN SLOVENE LANGUAGE)....................39 4 1.Introduction This report is a deliverable submitted by the University of Nova Gorica under the Work package 6 titled ’Identities and strategies – raising awareness’ that is part of the international project TransEcoNet (Transnational Ecological Networks in Central Europe). The overall focus of the Work package 6.1 is to map out the relationship people have with their environment in a chosen geographical area. It is assumed that this knowledge can help us in understanding landscape use-patterns and support in devising more relevant policy measures. In this regard, the focus here is on ‘peoples’ perception of landscape changes’ and it is suggested that this type of qualitative data can be particularly useful for understanding of socio-economic/historic/cultural factors driving landscape changes. 1.1. Research area The chosen research area is the Pomurje region which has a total of 119.537 inhabitants spread out within 27 municipalities (Table 1, for further data). It is the most north-eastern region in the country characterized by a substantial portion of lowland and a continental climate (Figure 1). Figure 1. Pomurska region (red) Figure 2. Prekmurje and Lower Styria divided by Mura River 5 Table 1: Pomurska statistical region (SORS, 2010: 36) Area, km 2 , 31. 12. 2008 1.337 Population, 31. 12. 2008 119.537 Density of population, 31. 12. 2008 89,4 Number of live births, 2008 1.058 Number of deaths, 2008 1.337 Natural increase, 2008 .-279 Number of pupils, 2008/2009 1) 9.101 Number of upper secondary school pupils, 2008/2009 1) 4.960 Number of tertiary students, 2008/2009 2) 5.551 Number of tertiary graduates, 2008 2) 833 Number of persons in employment, 2008 43.464 Number of persons in paid employment, 2008 36.005 Number of self-employed persons, 2008 7.459 Number of registered unemployed persons, 2008 6.733 Average monthly gross earning by statistical region of residence, total, 1.204 2008 - for men 1.258 - for women 1.140 Number of enterprises, 2008 6.702 Turnover of enterprises, mio EUR, 2008 2.680 Number of agricultural holdings, 2007 9.794 Utilised agricultural area, ha, 2007 65.498 Number of tourist arrivals, 2008 214.356 Through the history the political borders in Pomurje were changing. From the 9th Century until the end of the First World War (1918) the Prekmurje (the area of Pomurje on the left side of the river Mura) was under Hungarian political and public spheres (Figure 2). The Ku čnica River was the delineation of the political boundary with Austria as was the Mura
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martin Kojc, Most K Spoznanju, KUD Prasila, 2018) 10.40–10.55 Dr
    Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu Državni svet RS Ljubljana 24. april 2019 10.00–10.20 Pozdravni nagovori Matjaž Švagan, podpredsednik Državnega sveta Jurij Borko, župan Občine Središče ob Dravi Danijel Vrbnjak, župan Občine Ormož Mag. Primož Ilešič, sekretar na Uradu RS za Slovence v zamejstvu in po svetu Dušan Gerlovič, predsednik uprave Ustanove dr. Antona Trstenjaka 10.20–10.40 Helena Srnec, kratka predstavitev knjige Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu ter predstavitev Martina Kojca (Martin Kojc, most k spoznanju, KUD Prasila, 2018) 10.40–10.55 dr. Janek Musek, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani, Oddelek za psihologijo – Martin Kojc – duhovni izvori in samoniklost 10.55–11.10 doc. dr. Igor Škamperle, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani, Oddelek za sociologijo – Razumevanje celovitosti osebe v nauku Martina Kojca in pojem individuacije C. G. Junga 11.10–11.20 Jan Brodnjak, A. Diabelli: Sonata v f-duru 11.20–11.35 mag. Blanka Erhartič, Gimnazija Ormož – Kje lahko najde svoje mesto Martin Kojc v splošni gimnaziji? 11.35–11.50 mag. Franc Mikša, veleposlanik v Ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve – Razmišljanje gimnazijca ob branju knjige Martina Kojca Das Lehrbuch des Lebens v letih 1968 in 1969 11.50–12.05 mag. Bojan Šinko, Zasebna klinična psihološka ambulanta, pranečak M. Kojca – Martin Kojc skozi oči pranečaka 12.05–12.20 Razprava 12.20–13.00 Pogostitev Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu Prleška düša; severovzhodna Slovenija s poudarkom na Prlekiji: prleški ustvarjalci in Prlekija v literarnih delih
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING: 25 May, 20.00 BIO 25 Talk: 25 May, 19.00
    OPENING: 25 May, 20.00 BIO 25 Talk: 25 May, 19.00 From 25 May to 29 October 2017 , FARAWAY, SO CLOSE will present seven site-specific interventions along with the exhibition, accompanied by Associated Projects with a lively program of events, exhibits and lectures that will animate the seven locations for the duration of the Biennial. The exhibition will be officially opened by guest of honor, Anton Peršak, Minister of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia . A talk with the curators of the biennial, Angela Rui and Maja Vardjan , and guests Renata Salecl, Simone Farresin , and James Westcott will be held before the official opening at 19.00 The talk will be moderated by James Taylor Foster . Curated by Angela Rui and Maja Vardjan, and organised by the Museum of Architecture and Design in Ljubljana, 25th Biennial of Design FARAWAY, SO CLOSE responds to the observation that although the city remains the model within which the evolution of contemporary society is discussed and interpreted, we are recently witnessing a growing percentage of people that leave the city for other contexts and environments. The Biennial develops from the physical exploration of seven conditions all over Slovenia on which designers were invited to reflect. This is a contemporary phenomenon characteristic of our era: young, informed and emancipated people who have grown up within urban models bring their values into non-urban spaces. The theoretical appropriation of the so-called Alter-urban within the context of BIO 25 has been made possible by the de-centralization of the biennial itself, together with the physical observation and response of the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable T2.1.1 Collection of Primary and Secondary Data
    “Development of an innovative network for the promotion of extroversion of agro-food companies in Adriatic – Ionian Area” Collection of Primary and Secondary Data This report was prepared for and submitted to the “INNOVAGRO” Project by: “This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of the Technical University of Crete and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union and/or ADRION Programme authorities”. © Copyright by the “Innovagro” project Collection of Primary and Secondary Data The “INNOVAGRO” partnership consists of: Name Role Country Chania Chamber of Commerce and Industry Lead Partner Greece Region of Crete Partner 2 Greece Technical University of Crete Partner 3 Greece Network of the Insular Chamber of Commerce Partner 4 Greece and Industry of the European Union Province of Potenza Partner 5 Italy E-institute, institute for comprehensive Partner 6 Slovenia development solutions Italian Confederation of Agriculture Partner 7 Italy Union of Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Partner 8 Albania Albania Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia Partner 9 Serbia University of Basilicata Partner 10 Italy History Changes Version Date of Issue Document Title Author(s) Controller Number 1.0 23/7/2019 E. Grigoroudis T. Tsimrikidis ©INNOVAGRO Page 1 Collection of Primary and Secondary Data Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • POROČILO O Reviziji Poslovanja OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE Za Obdobje 1995−1999, S Poudarkom Na Letu 1998
    RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE Na podlagi prvega odstavka 24. člena Zakona o računskem sodišču (Uradni list RS, št. 48/94) in 23. člena Poslovnika Računskega sodišča Republike Slovenije (Uradni list RS, št. 20/95) izdaja pristojna članica računskega sodišča naslednje predhodno POROČILO o reviziji poslovanja OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE za obdobje 1995−1999, s poudarkom na letu 1998 Številka: 1215-35/99-43 Ljubljana, 5. april 2000 KAZALO MNENJE ................................................................................................................................................4 PRIPOROČILA ......................................................................................................................................7 PREDSTAVITEV OBČINE...................................................................................................................8 1 Osnovne informacije o občini.............................................................................................................8 2 Sprejemanje in veljavnost proračunskih predpisov...........................................................................11 UGOTOVITVE ....................................................................................................................................12 1 Upoštevanje proračuna za leta 1995−1998 .......................................................................................12 2 Poslovne knjige in računovodski izkazi............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Report on Impacts on Environment
    SUMMARY OF REPORT ON IMPACTS ON ENVIRONMENT FOR ELECTRIFICATION, RECONSTRUCTION AND UPGRADING OF THE RAILWAY LINE PRAGERSKO - HODOŠ Maribor, November 2010 (updated September 2012) 1 SUMMARY FOR PUBLIC 1.1 BASIC DATA ON THE HOLDER OF ACTIVITY AND REPORT ON IMPACTS ON ENVIRONMENT Title of the measure: Electrification, reconstruction and upgrading of the railway line from Pragersko to Hodoš Purpose: It deals with electrification, reconstruction and upgrading of the existing railway line from Pragersko to Hodoš, which runs partially on the line No. 40 Pragersko-Središče- state border with the Republic of Croatia on the section from Pragersko to Ormož and on the line No. 41 Ormož-Murska Sobota-Hodoš – state border with the Republic of Hungary. The electrification of the 109 km of the existing railway line means the continuation of the development of the public railway infrastructure in the South-East part of Slovenia and the modernisation of the Vth traffic corridor. The foreseen measures of electrification (placing of poles for the supply) will run on the existing alignment. To assure the technical standards the line will be reconstructed on five places, namely in front of Ormož, in Pavlovci and Ivanjkovci as well as on stations Ptuj and Hodoš. Within electrification also the construction of five electrical substations is foreseen for the supply of traction with electricity. Holder: The holder of the activity is Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Transport, Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for the management of public railway infrastructure investment, Kopitarjeva 5, Maribor. Responsible person of Maksimiljan Dolinšek, u.d.i.e. the holder: Valid spatial National spatial plan for electrification and reconstruction of the railway document: line Pragersko–Hodoš (Official Gazette RS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicanski List 04-APR 2019.Indd
    EVANGELIČANSKI LIST April 2019 Mesečnik Evangeličanske Cerkve AV v Republiki Sloveniji Letnik XXXXVIII Želimo vam blagoslovljene in vesele Velikonočne praznike. On pa jim je rekel: »Ne čudite se! Jezusa iščete, Nazarenčana, križanega. Bil je obujen. Ni ga tukaj« (Mr 16, 6) 2 evangeličanski list Drage bralke in bralci ! »Ni ga tukaj, vstal je!« ričlanske družine ponudil za talca, je bil obenem neizmerno človeški S temi »velikonočnimi« bese- čeprav je vedel, da bo ustreljen. in globok. On je tisti, ki nam je po- dami, ki kličejo v pozdrav vsta- A to ni edini primer žrtvovanja, sredoval nauk, ki se velikokrat ni lemu Kristusu, vas tudi sam prav ki ponuja samega sebe, da drugi ujemal niti z etablirano religijo niti prisrčno pozdravljam. lahko preživijo. z etablirano posvetno oblastjo, kar Pozdravljam z velikonočno mi- Vsakoletno praznovanje Velike ga je pripeljalo na križ. Toda preko slijo, ki pravi, da človeška usoda noči, ko iz perspektive njene vse- smrti in groba spet nazaj v življe- ni le potovanje h Golgoti, ampak bine gledamo na življenje danes nje. Brez tega, sem prepričan, bi nas vodi tudi življenju naproti. To in tu, nas seveda postavlja pred usmeritev k »jutrišnjemu človeku« nas bodri. In prav je tako. Kajti čim mnoga vprašanja in odpira mno- bila brez vsakršne možnosti. glasnejši so klici našega obupane- ge dileme. Po vsem svetu, v mnogih jezi- ga sveta v smislu velikopetkovega: V kaj lahko še verujem? Komu kih in še številnejših narečjih ljudje »Križaj ga«, tem močnejši in raz- lahko še zaupam? Kako smiselno v teh dneh polni veselja in zaupa- poznavnejši mora biti tudi glas, ki je delati dobro, pošteno? Ali še nja izgovarjajo besede: »Kristus je kliče po kulturi življenja in ne po smemo zaupati in verjeti v člo- vstal!« Resnično je vstal! In tako kulturi smrti.
    [Show full text]
  • References, 99-103
    References Henning Andersen, 1999: The Western South Slavic Contrast Sn. sah‑ni‑ti // SC. sah‑nu‑ti. Slovenski jezik – Slovene Linguistic Studies 2, 47–62. Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, 1988: Variation and Convergence: Studies in Social Dialectology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Peter Auer and Frans Hinskens, 1996: The Convergence and Divergence of Dia‑ lects in Europe. Sociolinguistica 10, 1–30. Vladimir Bračič, 1967: Vinorodne Haloze. Maribor: Založba Obzorja. – –, 1982: Gozdnate Haloze. Maribor: Založba Obzorja. Andrew F. Burghardt, 1962: Borderland: A Historical and Geographical Study of Burgenland, Austria. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. J. K. Chambers, and Peter Trudgill, 1980: Dialectology. London: Cambridge University Press. Jože Ciperle and Andrej Vovko, 1987: Šolstvo na Slovenskem skozi stoletja. Lju‑ bljana: Slovenski šolski muzej. H. Giles, D. Taylor and R. Bourhis, 1973: Toward a Theory of Interpersonal Accommodation through Speech: Some Canadian Data. Language in Society 2, 177–92. Marc L. Greenberg, 1992: Circumflex Advancement in Prekmurje and Beyond. Journal of the Society for Slovene Studies 14/1, 69–91. – –, 1995: Archaisms and Innovations in the Dialect of Sredisce (Southeastern Prlekija, Slovenia). Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference on Balkan and South Slavic Linguistics, Literature and Folklore (Indiana Slavic Studies 7), 91–102. – –, 2000: A Historical Phonology of the Slovene Language. Heidelberg: Universitäts‑ verlag C. Winter. – –, 2006: A Short Reference Grammar of Standard Slovene. SEELRC Reference Gram‑ mar Network. Duke University / University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: SEELRC. 99 Grant H. Lundberg, Dialect Leveling in Haloze, Slovenia Stanko Guldescu, 1964: History of Medieval Croatia. The Hague: Mouton and Co. Peter Herrity, 2000: Slovene: A Comprehensive Grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDSTAVITEV KULTURNE DEDIŠČINE Z NARODNOSTNO MEŠANEGA OBMOČJA OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE S Projektnimi Aktivnostmi Za Popularizacijo Madžarske Folklore in Kulinarike
    PREDSTAVITEV KULTURNE DEDIŠČINE Z NARODNOSTNO MEŠANEGA OBMOČJA OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE S projektnimi aktivnostmi za popularizacijo madžarske folklore in kulinarike Območje občine Moravske Toplice je narodnostno mešano območje, kjer avtohtono živijo pripadniki madžarske narodnostne skupnosti. Na območju dveh krajevnih skupnosti v petih naseljih (Čikečka vas/Csekefa, Motvarejvci/Szentlászló, Pordašinci/Kisfalu, Prosenjakovci/Pártosfalva, Središče/Szerdahely) se poleg slovenščine kot uradnega jezika uporablja tudi madžarščina. Z madžarskimi vplivi obogatena pa je tudi zakladnica kulturne dediščine z navedenega območja. Z namenom predstavitve folklorne in kulinarične raznolikosti z dvojezičnega območja je TIC Moravske Toplice izvedel projekta Folklora zbližuje in povezuje ter Okusi (z)družijo in bogatijo. Na narodnostno mešanem območju v občini deluje dvojezična OŠ Prosenjakovci kot matična šola. Na DOŠ Prosenjakovci deluje otroška folklorna skupina Ugrós, ki skozi plese in glasbo predstavlja madžarsko folkloro. TIC Moravske Toplice je kot vodilni partner projekta Folklora zbližuje in povezuje k sodelovanju povabil partnerja DOŠ Prosenjakovci in KUD Attila József Motvarjevci. S projektom je vodilni partner želel spodbuditi medgeneracijski in medkulturni dialog ter z medsebojnim sodelovanjem sodelujočih predstaviti dediščino madžarske narodnostne manjšine širši javnosti. Tako odrasli kot tudi najmlajši prebivalci občine so skozi izobraževalni program dodatno poglobljeno spoznavali lastno narodnostno identiteto, skozi kulturne in informativne dejavnosti pa se jih je spodbujalo k ohranjanju jezika in kulturne dediščine. V okviru projekta je bilo izvedenih 5 nastopov oziroma predstavitev, v okviru katerih se je širši javnosti predstavila OFS Ugrós DOŠ Prosenjakovci. Otroci z dvojezičnega območja z obeh strani meje so se lahko družili na 2 srečanjih otroških manjšinskih folklornih skupin. Učenci iz DOŠ Števanovci in DOŠ Prosenjakovci so tekmovali v okviru kviza na temo dediščine manjšin.
    [Show full text]
  • Občinska Volilna Komisija Občine Moravske Toplice
    OBČINSKA VOLILNA KOMISIJA OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE Številka: OVK 3/10 Datum: 11.08.2010 Na podlagi 41. člena Zakona o lokalnih volitvah (Uradni list RS, št. 94/07-uradno prečiščeno besedilo in 45/08) je Občinska volilna komisija Občine Moravske Toplice, na seji dne 11.08.2010, sprejela S K L E P O DOLOČITVI VOLIŠČ ZA IZVEDBO REDNIH VOLITEV ŽUPANA IN ČLANOV OBČINSKEGA SVETA OBČINE MORAVSKE TOPLICE I. Za izvedbo volitev župana in članov občinskega sveta ter za izvedbo morebitnega drugega kroga za volitve župana se v Občini Moravske Toplice, ki obsega območje celotne občine z naselji Andrejci, Berkovci, Bogojina, Bukovnica, Čikečka vas - Csekefa, Filovci, Fokovci, Ivanci, Ivanjševci, Ivanovci, Kančevci, Krnci, Lončarovci, Martjanci, Mlajtinci, Moravske Toplice, Motvarjevci Szentlászló, Noršinci, Pordašinci - Kisfalu, Prosenjakovci - Pártosfalva, Ratkovci, Sebeborci, Selo, Središče - Szerdahely, Suhi Vrh, Tešanovci in Vučja Gomila, določijo naslednja volišča: 01 Andrejci, vaško-gasilski dom 02 Berkovci, gasilski dom 03 Bogojina, osnovna šola 04 Bukovnica, vaško-gasilski dom 05 Čikečka vas – Csekefa, vaško-gasilski dom - falu és tűzoltó otthon 06 Filovci, vaško-gasilski dom 07 Fokovci, gasilski dom 08 Ivanci, stara šola 09 Ivanjševci, vaško-gasilski dom 10 Ivanovci, vaško-gasilski dom 11 Kančevci, gasilski dom 12 Krnci, vaško-gasilski dom 13 Lončarovci, gasilski dom 14 Martjanci, vaško-gasilski dom 15 Mlajtinci, vaško-gasilski dom (na tem volišču glasujejo tudi občani Lukačevec) 16 Moravske Toplice 1, gasilski dom Dolga ulica 63 (obsega območje z naslednjimi ulicami: Levstikova ul., Ulica Ob igrišču, Delavska ul., Kratka ul., Kranjčeva ul., Na bregu, Lešče, Brezje, Brzinšček in del Dolge ul. (neparne h.št. od 1 do 115 in parne h.št.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by the Republic of Slovenia on the Implementation of The
    ACFC/SR (2000) 4 REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1, OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL EXPLANATION ABOUT DRAWING UP THE REPORT __________4 PART I _____________________________________________________________6 General information______________________________________________________ 6 Brief historical outline and social arrangement _______________________________ 6 Basic Economic Indicators ________________________________________________ 6 Recent general statements _________________________________________________ 7 Status of International Law________________________________________________ 8 The Protection of National Minorities and the Romany Community ______________ 9 Basic demographic data__________________________________________________ 11 Efficient measures for achieving the general goal of the Framework Convention __ 12 PART II ___________________________________________________________13 Article 1_______________________________________________________________ 13 Article 2_______________________________________________________________ 14 Article 3_______________________________________________________________ 16 Article 4_______________________________________________________________ 18 Article 5_______________________________________________________________ 26 Article 6_______________________________________________________________ 31 Article 7_______________________________________________________________ 37 Article 8_______________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Handbook on Best Practices Development of Sustainable Mobility Management in European Cities
    DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN EUROPEAN CITIES THE HANDBOOK ON BEST PRACTICES DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN EUROPEAN CITIES THE HANDBOOK ON BEST PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENT PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 DEMO-EC PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 PARTNERS AND REGIONS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 BEHAVIOUR CHANGE .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. GERMANY: CITY CYCLING IN LEIPZIG ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2. SPAIN: THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN IN ZARAGOZA ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Őrség-Goričko Nature Park”38 Project the DRUSTVO Dota Was the Cross-Border Partner Organisation from Črenšovci
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of the Őrség-Goričko cooperation Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. The development of cross-border co-operation ................................................................. 11 4. Presentation of the geographical environment of the co-operation .................................. 21 5. Organisational and institutional structure and operation ................................................... 31 6. The components of the work organisation ......................................................................... 44 7. Main areas of activities/profile ........................................................................................... 46 8. Initiatives related to the first nature park: Projects prior to the establishment of the Őrség National Park and Goričko Landscape Park .............................................................. 48 8.1 Joint trans-European co-operations ............................................................................ 50 8.2 Green Belt Initiative ..................................................................................................... 55 8.3 Mutual cross-border co-operation projects ..............................................................
    [Show full text]