BICYCLE COMMUTER RESOURCE GUIDE for the Baltimore Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mountain Bike Accessories for Trail Work
Part 1 of 3 United States Department of Agriculture MountainMountain BikeBike Forest Service Technology & Development AccessoriesAccessories forfor Program 2300 Recreation April 1998 TTrailrail WWorkork 9823-2812-MTDC Brian Vachowski, Project Leader 7E72A47–Accessories for Transporting Trail Maintenance Tools 1 Part 1 of 3 Contents Acknowledgments Part 1of 3 any people throughout the country who are not listed Introduction ___________________________ 3 here helped on this project with their comments and MM suggestions. I am especially grateful to the following The Situation at Seward _________________ 4 for their indepth contributions: Benefits of Bicycles ____________________ 5 Suzanne Hanlon, Adventure Cycling Association Not for Everyone _______________________ 6 Stephen Hmurciak, Seward Ranger District Panniers ______________________________ 7 Irene Lindquist, Seward Ranger District Chain Saw Carrier ______________________ 8 Kurt Loheit, International Mountain Bicycling Assn. Part 2 of 3 John Morris, Burley Design Cooperative Trailers ______________________________ 10 Sylvia Russell, Recreational Equipment, Inc. B.O.B. Yak Trailer _________________________ 10 B.O.B. Coz Trailer _________________________ 11 Wheele Pac Dog Trailer _____________________ 11 Keith Wolferman, Missoula Aerial Fire Depot Burley Design Cooperative’s Prototype _________ 11 Part 3 of 3 MTDC Staff: Bob Beckley, Windy Hayden, Bob Hensler, Product Sources and Organizations ______ 14 Gary Hoshide, Bert Lindler, and Sara Lustgraaf. About the Author______________________ 14 Appendix A—Job Hazard Analyses for Riding Mountain Bicycles and for Trailers _____________ 15 Appendix B—Kurt Loheit’s Tool Holder (Fits B.O.B. Yak Trailer) _______________________ 17 The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating Federal and State agencies, and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. -
Bicycle Public Hearing Summary Report
BICYCLE PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY REPORT DALLAS AND FORT WORTH DISTRICTS IN COORDINATION WITH NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OCTOBER 2014 Bicycle Public H earing October 2014 CONTENTS 1. PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATIONS 2. PUBLIC HEARING COMMENT AND RESPONSE REPORT 3. PUBLIC HEARING POLL RESULTS 4. PUBLIC HEARING SURVEY RESULTS APPENDIX A. COPY OF WRITTEN COMMENTS B. COPY OF SURVEY RESULTS C. COPY OF ATTENDANCE SHEETS D. PUBLIC MEETING PHOTOS Bicycle Public H earing October 2014 1. PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS / RECOMMENDATIONS FOR: Texas Dept. Of Transportation (TxDOT), Dallas and Fort Worth Districts Annual Bicycle Public Hearing PURPOSE: To conduct a public hearing on transportation projects and programs that might affect bicycle use, in accordance with Title 43 of Texas Administrative Code, Subchapter D, §25.55 (b). PARTNERS: North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Public Hearing Format The bicycle public hearing agenda is as follows: (1) Open House 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m (2) Welcome and Introductions 6:00 p.m. to 6:10 p.m. (a) Kathy Kleinschmidt, P.E., TxDOT Dallas District (3) Presentations 6:10 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. (a) State Bike Plan and Programs (i) Teri Kaplan – Statewide Bicycle Coordinator (b) Bicycle Policies and Projects (i) Kathy Kleinschmidt, P.E. – TxDOT Dallas District (ii) Phillip Hays, P.E. – TxDOT Fort Worth District (c) Regional Bicycle Programs and Projects (i) Karla Weaver, AICP – NCTCOG (4) Open House 7:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Need and Purpose In accordance with Title 43 of Texas Administrative Code, Subchapter D, §25.55 (b) , a notice for the opportunity of a public hearing for transportation projects for bicycle use was published in the local newspapers for TxDOT’s Dallas and Fort Worth districts in April 2014. -
Propelling Change a Guide to Effective Cycling Advocacy Ward Advocacy Program (WAP)
Propelling Change A Guide to Effective Cycling Advocacy Ward Advocacy Program (WAP) The Ward Advocacy Program is at the heart of the bike union. Its goal is to connect individuals who are motivated to improving cycling infrastructure and offering education in their ward. The vision of the program is to build a movement of grassroots advocacy in local wards which will improve cycling for everyone in the city. The Ward Advocacy Program is meant to engage cyclists, and non-cyclists alike, to support activities that promote the everyday use of bicycles by improving infrastructure, facilities and the public perception of cycling as a valid and vital mode of transportation. Toronto Cyclists Union The Toronto Cyclists Union is a membership-based organization that brings together cyclists from all across Toronto. We are a strong, unified voice advocating the rights of cyclists of all ages and from all parts of the city. We aim to shift the political culture that has resisted the changes that are needed to ensure safe streets for cyclists. We are a vibrant and amplified voice calling for the common goals of safe, legitimate and accessible cycling in Toronto. The bike union coordinates city-wide advocacy on behalf of our members and provide resources for cyclists to be effective advocates themselves by participating in the Ward Advocacy Program. Our commitment to you The bike union and ward groups work together in trust and for mutual benefit to improve cycling conditions across the city. We recognize that to realize our vision of a united, cyclist -
2008/2009 Fall-W Inter Program Guide
B C R P Guide Program 2008/2009 Fall-Winter Baltimore City Department of Recreation and Parks Wanda S. Durden www.baltimorecity.gov/recnparks Sheila Dixon Director Mayor Dominic “Mimi” DiPietro How do we double Baltimore’s Family Skating Facility trees in the next 30 years? Patterson Park 200 S. Linwood Ave. Baltimore, MD 21224 We don’t; you do. You can rent the Skating Center for your very own special events and For more information on TreeBaltimore, birthday parties! Ask about our “Cool Student” program for those please call Myra Brosius at (410) 396-6109 or e-mail with perfect attendance and those [email protected]. on the Principal’s List. For more information, please call (410) 396-9392. Visit Baltimore City Department of Recreation and Parks’ Forestry Division on the Web at: www.baltimorecity.gov/recnparks. Shape Up Parks! Saturday, October 25, 2008 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Want to help create a Greener Baltimore? We are looking for volunteers to help “Shape Up Parks.” Paint, plant and clean at a project near you, or design a project and let us know how we can help you help our parks For more information, please call (410) 396-7900, or e-mail [email protected]. Visit us on the Web at: www.baltimorecity.gov/recnparks Greetings from the Mayor The City of Baltimore has become one of the nation’s most treasured jewels because our citizens have embraced a cleaner, greener and healthier lifestyle. From our youth to our senior citizens, residents are taking advantage of the great activities offered by Baltimore City Department of Recreation and Parks. -
FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide
BIKEWAY SELECTION GUIDE FEBRUARY 2019 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2019 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Bikeway Selection Guide NA 6. AUTHORS 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER Schultheiss, Bill; Goodman, Dan; Blackburn, Lauren; DTFH61-16-D-00005 Wood, Adam; Reed, Dan; Elbech, Mary 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION VHB, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 REPORT NUMBER Raleigh, NC 27606 NA Toole Design Group, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Mobycon - North America, Durham, NC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Tamara Redmon FHWA-SA-18-077 Project Manager, Office of Safety Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public on the FHWA website at: NA https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike 13. ABSTRACT This document is a resource to help transportation practitioners consider and make informed decisions about trade- offs relating to the selection of bikeway types. This report highlights linkages between the bikeway selection process and the transportation planning process. This guide presents these factors and considerations in a practical process- oriented way. It draws on research where available and emphasizes engineering judgment, design flexibility, documentation, and experimentation. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Bike, bicycle, bikeway, multimodal, networks, 52 active transportation, low stress networks 16. PRICE CODE NA 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. -
The Vermont Legislative Research Shop
The Vermont Legislative Research Shop Healthy Communities Background Many lawmakers and organizations are recognizing the connection between public health and community planning. A 1998 study from the Centers for Disease Control reports that approximately 29% of adults in the US are considered “sedentary” and 50% are considered overweight, creating what some consider a formidable health burden (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998). Many interest groups and professionals agree that physical inactivity can be remedied in part by healthy city planning, but differ on the best way to implement changes. Healthy Residents There are proactive ideas to help community members become more active, most prominent is the push to include walking and/or bicycling into one’s daily routine (Killingsworth 2001). Walking is perhaps the most accessible form of exercise for all people, and studies suggest that it can be beneficial. For instance, in a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, it is reported that “among retired, nonsmoking men, those who walked less than 1.6 km a day had a mortality rate nearly twice that of those who walked more than 3.2 km per day” (Hakim et al, 1998). Bicycling is another popular form of exercise that can allow people to get school and work every day. The League of American Bicyclists reports that about 42 million Americans own bicycles, but many people use them recreationally rather than as a primary form of transportation (Killingsworth 1998). Killingsworth also reports that “in the United States, nearly 25% of all trips are less than 1 mile, but more than 75% these short trips are made by automobile, so it is reasonable to expect that many trips could be made on foot or bicycle” (1998). -
Trends and Determinants of Cycling in the Washington, DC Region 6
Trends and Determinants of Cycling in the Washington, DC Region The Pennsylvania State University University of Maryland University of Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University West Virginia University The Pennsylvania State University The Thomas D. Larson Pennsylvania Transportation Institute Transportation Research Building University Park, PA 16802-4710 Phone: 814-863-1909 Fax: 814-865-3930 1. Report No. VT-2009-05 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. Trends and Determinants of Cycling in the Washington, DC Region 6. Performing Organization Code Virginia Tech 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ralph Buehler with Andrea Hamre, Dan Sonenklar, and Paul Goger 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Virginia Tech, Urban Affairs and Planning, , Alexandria Center, 1021 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 11. Contract or Grant No. DTRT07-G-0003 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered US DOT Final Report, 08/2010-11/2011 Research & Innovative Technology Admin UTC Program, RDT-30 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report analyzes cycling trends, policies, and commuting in the Washington, DC area. The analysis is divided into two parts. Part 1 focuses on cycling trends and policies in Washington (DC), Alexandria (VA), Arlington County (VA), Fairfax County (VA), Montgomery County (MD), and Prince George’s County (MD) during the last two decades. The goal is to gain a better understanding of variability and determinants of cycling within one metropolitan area. Data on bicycling trends and policies originate from official published documents, unpublished reports, site visits, and in-person, email, or phone interviews with transport planners and experts from municipal governments, regional planning agencies, and bicycling advocacy organizations. -
Bicycle Master Plan: 2012
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN: 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREPARED FOR V VISION STATEMENT VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IX CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1 BICYCLING IN MESA 1 THE BENEFITS OF BICYCLING 3 BICYCLE TRIP AND RIDER CHARACTERISTICS 6 BICYCLE USE IN MESA 8 PAST BICYCLE PLANNING EFFORTS 12 REGIONAL PLANNING & COORDINATION EFFORTS 15 WHY MESA NEEDS AN UPDATED BICYCLE PLAN 20 PLAN UPDATE PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM 23 CHAPTER 2 - GOALS & OBJECTIVES 25 PURPOSE OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 25 GOAL ONE 27 GOAL TWO 28 GOAL THREE 29 GOAL FOUR 30 GOAL FIVE 31 i CHAPTER 3 - EDUCATION, ENCOURAGEMENT, AND ENFORCEMENT 33 INTRODUCTION 33 MESARIDES! 34 EDUCATION 35 ENCOURAGEMENT 38 ENFORCEMENT 42 CHAPTER 4 - BICYCLE FACILITIES AND DESIGN OPTIONS 47 INTRODUCTION 47 BASIC ELEMENTS 48 WAYFINDING 52 BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN STANDARDS 53 BICYCLE ACCESSIBILITY 58 CHAPTER 5 - MESA’S BICYCLE NETWORK 61 INTRODUCTION 61 MESA’S NETWORK OF THE FUTURE 65 DEVELOPING A RECOMMENDED FUTURE NETWORK 68 METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY NEEDS 72 ii CHAPTER 6 - IMPLEMENTATION, EVALUATION, AND FUNDING 101 INTRODUCTION 101 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 103 IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA 104 PROJECT PRIORITY RANKING 105 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAM EXPANSION 122 ADDITIONAL STAFF REQUIREMENTS 124 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT 125 SUMMARY 130 APPENDIX A - THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN PROCESS 131 PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN 131 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY INPUT PROCESS 132 BENEFITS OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP) 132 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP) PLAN 133 MESA BICYCLE -
Gwynns Falls/Leakin Park to Middle Branch Park Hanover Street Bridge
When complete, the 35-mile Baltimore Greenway Trails Network will connect the city’s anchor institutions and destinations with Baltimore’s diverse communities. For more information, go to railstotrails.org/Baltimore. View and download a full map of the trail network route: rtc.li/baltimore_map-footprint. Gwynns Falls/Leakin Park to Middle Branch Park Western Loop Segment This mostly complete section of the loop heads southeast on the Gwynns Falls Trail from Gwynns Falls/Leakin park— one of the largest urban parks/forests in the country—to Middle Branch Park, with a further connection to Cherry Hill Park further south. On its way, it connects a number of historically significant neighborhoods and parks, the oldest railroad trestle in the country, the B&O Museum and roundhouse (the birthplace of the railroad in America), St. Agnes Hospital and many other historical destinations. Hanover Street Bridge to Canton Southern Loop Segment The loop segment extends from Hanover Street Bridge—on the southern side of the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River—north to Port Covington. A large- scale planning and redevelopment project at Port Covington for Under Armour’s world headquarters is Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks Bike Around Program Photo by Molly Gallant underway, which will include public shoreline access and the connecting of both sides of the river via a disused railroad trestle. The corridor travels through one of the Canton to Herring Run Southeast Loop Segment last undeveloped sections of the Baltimore shoreline, provides great views of the city skyline and passes by This segment of the project involves the transformation many historical sites. -
THE IMPORTANCE of SINGLETRACK from the International Mountain Bicycling Association
THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLETRACK From the International Mountain Bicycling Association “Mountain biking on singletrack is like skiing in fresh powder, or matching the hatch while fly fishing, or playing golf at Pebble Beach.” —Bill Harris; Montrose, Colorado “On singletrack I meet and talk to lots of hikers and bikers and I don’t do that nearly as much on fire roads. Meeting people on singletrack brings you a little closer to them.” — Ben Marriott; Alberta, Canada INTRODUCTION In recent years mountain bike trail advocates have increasingly needed to defend the legitimacy of bicycling on singletrack trails. As land agencies have moved forward with a variety of recreational planning processes, some officials and citizens have objected to singletrack bicycling, and have suggested that bicyclists should be satisfied with riding on roads – paved and dirt surfaced. This viewpoint misunderstands the nature of mountain bicycling and the desires of bicyclists. Bike riding on narrow, natural surface trails is as old as the bicycle. In its beginning, all bicy- cling was essentially mountain biking, because bicycles predate paved roads. In many historic photographs from the late 19th-century, people are shown riding bicycles on dirt paths. During World War II the Swiss Army outfitted companies of soldiers with bicycles to more quickly travel on narrow trails through mountainous terrain. In the 1970’s, when the first mountain bikes were being fashioned from existing “clunkers,” riders often took their bikes on natural surface routes. When the mass production of mountain bikes started in the early 1980’s, more and more bicyclists found their way into the backcountry on narrow trails. -
23Rd Annual Antique & Classic Bicycle Auction
CATALOG PRICE $4.00 Michael E. Fallon / Seth E. Fallon COPAKE AUCTION INC. 266 Rt. 7A - Box H, Copake, N.Y. 12516 PHONE (518) 329-1142 FAX (518) 329-3369 Email: [email protected] Website: www.copakeauction.com 23rd Annual Antique & Classic Bicycle Auction Featuring the David Metz Collection Also to include a selection of ephemera from the Pedaling History Museum, a Large collection of Bicycle Lamps from the Midwest and other quality bicycles, toys, accessories, books, medals, art and more! ************************************************** Auction: Saturday April 12, 2014 @ 9:00 am Swap Meet: Friday April 11th (dawn ‘til dusk) Preview: Thur. – Fri. April 10-11: 11-5pm, Sat. April 12, 8-9am TERMS: Everything sold “as is”. No condition reports in descriptions. Bidder must look over every lot to determine condition and authenticity. Cash or Travelers Checks - MasterCard, Visa and Discover Accepted First time buyers cannot pay by check without a bank letter of credit 17% buyer's premium (2% discount for Cash or Check) 20% buyer's premium for LIVE AUCTIONEERS Accepting Quality Consignments for All Upcoming Sales National Auctioneers Association - NYS Auctioneers Association CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. Some of the lots in this sale are offered subject to a reserve. This reserve is a confidential minimum price agreed upon by the consignor & COPAKE AUCTION below which the lot will not be sold. In any event when a lot is subject to a reserve, the auctioneer may reject any bid not adequate to the value of the lot. 2. All items are sold "as is" and neither the auctioneer nor the consignor makes any warranties or representations of any kind with respect to the items, and in no event shall they be responsible for the correctness of the catalogue or other description of the physical condition, size, quality, rarity, importance, medium, provenance, period, source, origin or historical relevance of the items and no statement anywhere, whether oral or written, shall be deemed such a warranty or representation. -
City of Davis Bicycle Plan 2009
CITY OF DAVIS BICYCLE PLAN 2009 City of Davis Bicycle Advisory Commission In February of 2005, the Davis City Council established the Bicycle Advisory Commission to address bicycle issues related to education, enforcement, engineering and encouragement. Membership of the Commission may include representatives from the general public, the Davis Bicycle Club, UCD Administration, and UCD students, among others. 2008-2009 Bicycle Advisory Commission Members John Berg Chair Jack Kenward Vice-Chair Earl Bossard Commissioner Kelli O’Neill Commissioner Alan Jackman Commissioner Virginia Matzek Commissioner Angel York Commissioner Joe Krovoza Alternate David Takemoto-Weerts Ex-Officio 2007-2008 Bicycle Advisory Commission Members John Berg Chair Jack Kenward Vice-Chair Earl Bossard Commissioner Dan Kehew Commissioner Anthony Palmere Commissioner Lise Smidth Commissioner Ken Gaines Commissioner Kelli O’Neill Alternate David Takemoto-Weerts Ex-Officio Council Liaison to the Commission Sue Greenwald Staff Liaison to the Commission Tara Goddard 2 Resolution of Adoption RESOLUTION NO._______________, SERIES 2009 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF DAVIS BICYCLE PLAN WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan supports and encourages local agencies to develop comprehensive bicycle plans consistent with the regional plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Davis Bicycle Advisory Commission (BAC) has reviewed the Bicycle Plan and recommends its adoption; and WHEREAS, the proposed Bicycle Plan is consistent with the City of Davis General Plan and General Plan environmental