DOCSLIB.ORG

DATA REPORT Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Asian Cities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DATA REPORT Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Asian Cities DATA REPORT Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Asian Cities Dr. Muhammad Nanang Prayudyanto Ahmad Faris Saffan Sunarya, MSc. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Workshop on Sustainable Urban Transport Index Colombo, 30-31 October 2017 Indonesia Greater Jakarta GRDP US$ 108.7 mio Contribution to National: 18.48% Name of The City Area (Km2) Population (in Density Projection of million) (Pop/km2) 20 years Growth (%) JAKARTA (CITY) 662,33 10 ,08 15231,9 0,86 BOGOR REGENCY 2997,13 5,1 1705,8 1,22 BEKASI REGENCY 1269,51 2,81 2219,8 1,22 BOGOR (CITY) 111,73 1,03 9269,9 1,49 BEKASI (CITY) 213,58 2,54 11914,3 1,49 DEPOK (CITY) 199,44 1,89 9500,5 1,49 TANGERANG REGENCY 1011,86 3,13 3101,4 1,59 TANGERANG (CITY) 153,93 2,02 13163,6 1,99 SOUTH TANGERANG 147,19 1,45 9876,0 1,99 SELATAN (CITY) TOTAL 6766,7 30,1 Greater Jakarta Population trend in Metropolitan core and sub-urban areas Seoul MA 10 Bangkok MR 25 8 Total Total 20 6 15 SeoulCore-area City 4 Core-area 10 Suburb 2 population, million million population, population, 5 million million population, population, Suburb Population, million million Population, Population, Population, million million Population, Population, 0 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 20 Metro Manila* 25 Jabotabek 20 15 Total Total 15 10 M. ManilaCore Suburb 10 5 suburb 5 Core population, million million population, population, population, million million population, population, population, million million population, population, 0 million million population, population, 0 1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 *Study Area of MMUTIS Decentralization of population? 3 Sustainable Urban Transport Index 01 02 03 04 05 Extent to which Modal share of Convenient access Public transport Traffic fatalities per transport plans active and public to public transport quality and 100.000 inhabitants cover public transport in service reliability transport, commuting intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes 06 07 08 09 10 Affordability – Operational costs Investment in Air quality (pm10 Greenhouse gas travel costs as part of the public public concentration) emissions of Income transport System transportation . systems . INDICATOR 1 Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes SCORE NO COVERAGE 0 No goals -- No designation -- No budget 1 3 LIMITED CYCLING PUBLIC 1 Vague goal -- Little designation seen in plans -- NETWORK TRANSPORT Small or unclear budget MIDDLE 2 Qualitative goals -- Some designation in 1-2 WALKING INTERMODAL major areas/corridors -- Some budget NETWORK TRANSFER 2 FACILITIES 4 EXTENSIVE 3 Quantitative goals -- Much designation across city -- increased realistic budget LEADING 4 Ambitious goals -- Full designation across city - - Major secured new funding Indicative Scoring Criteria for Greater Jakarta Score 0 1 2 3 4 No coverage Limited Middle Extensive Leading I) WALKING Vague goal Qualitative goals Quantitative goals Ambitious goals NETWORKS No goals Little designation seen in Some designation in 1-2 Much designation across Full designation across No designation No plans major areas/corridors city city budget Small or unclear budget Some budget increased realistic Major secured new budget funding II) CYCLING Vague goal Qualitative goals Quantitative goals Ambitious goals NETWORKS No goals Little designation seen in Some designation in 1-2 Much designation across Full designation across No designation No plans major areas/corridors city city budget Small or unclear budget Some budget Increased Major secured new realistic budget funding III) INTERMODAL Vague goal Qualitative goals Quantitative goals Ambitious goals TRANSFER No goals Little designation seen in Some designation in 1-2 Much designation across Full designation across No designation No plans major areas/corridors city city FACILITIES budget Small or unclear budget Some budget Increased Major secured new realistic budget funding IV) PUBLIC Vague goal Qualitative goals Quantitative goals Ambitious goals TRANSPORT No goals Little designation seen in Some designation in 1-2 Much designation across Full designation across No designation No plans major areas/corridors city city budget Small or unclear budget Some budget Increased Major secured new realistic budget funding Walking Facilities Improvement 1. Walking Networks: KPI pedestrian access 2. Much designation (Jakarta, Kota Bekasi, Kota Bogor, Kota Tangerang, etc) 3. Budget: increased realistic budget Pedestrian Facilities Construction and Campaign 80 km pedestrian facilities in DKI Jakarta has been constructed in 2017. 24 km by Provincial and 56 km by Cities (5 Sub Provinces) Total budget: Rp. 412 bill. (± US$ 40 mio) Cycling Network 1. Cycling Networks: MoT and MPW Regulations on Pedestrian Facilities 2. Some designation (Jakarta, Kota Bogor, Kota Tangerang, etc) 3. Budget: some budget Intermodal Transfer Facilities Vending Machine 1. Intermodal at Railway Station Transfer: KPI P&R at Bogor Distance and Commuter Railway Station location in station and terminals 2. Much designation (Commuter Railway Stations P&R, Electronic Payment, BRT shelters, etc) Parking 3. Budget: increased at Railway Station realistic budget Development of Mass Public Transport System in Greater Jakarta: 2017 : Airport Railway 2017 : Elevated BRT 13rd Corridor in Jakarta (Tendean – Ciledug). Public 2018 : LRT Jabodetabek (Cawang – Cibubur) and LRT DKI Jakarta (Gading Nias – Transport Velodrome). 2019 : LRT Jabodetabek (Cawang – Bekasi Timur and Cawang – Dukuh Atas). 1. Public Transport: 2019 : MRT (Lebak Bulus – Bundaran HI). RITJ, PTM, Source: GJTA, 2017 Permenhub 54/2013 2. Full designation LRT Jabodetabek across cities (Trans Jabodetabek, JR Tunnel of Jakarta MRT Connection, JA Co, LRT, MRT, Commuter, Long distance rail, Ferry 3. Budget: major secured new funding INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK FOR GREATER JAKARTA Source: GJTA, 2016 GJTA, Source: INDICATOR 2 Modal Share of Active and Public Transport in Commuting Mode Economic Status Daily Trips Share Mode Share Lower income 8.314.748 16% Private cars and motorcycle ownership Motorcycle person grows inevitably as a natural effort by Medium Income 17.801.390 34% 53% trips each individual to fulfill their mobility needs. High Income 2.007.651 4% Lower income 1.211.348 2% low parking prices and subsidized fuel costs have affected the people’s decision to Car person trips Medium Income 7.233.139 14% 20% choose a private vehicle. High Income 2.056.607 4% Currently, Jakarta has two kinds of rapid Lower income 5.323.158 10% transit system : Transjakarta BRT and Public transport Commuter Rail (KRL) Medium Income 8.466.125 16% 27% person trips High Income 637.535 1% The KRL train headway is less convenient than TransJakarta because its frequent service Total Trips 53.051.701 100% 100% is only every 5-20 minutes per train Source: Japtrapis, 2012 Public Transport Masterplan Rail total : 159 km, 127 stations, 2 Operators 2 m trips/day 40% PT 60% Total PT Trips LRT : 29 km, 43 stations ~ 6 m/day 3.1 m trips/day 0.9 m trips/day Buses : 350 routes, 3700 buses, 4000 route- km, 2 Operators Taxis : 25,000 (7 Operators) Public Transport Modal Share Source: Japtrapis (JICA-MoT, 2012) 15 INDICATOR 3 Convenient Access to Public Transport Service Total Districts Serviced Assumed Serviced Population Area Kota Jakarta Utara 95 1,221,704.77 Kota Jakarta Timur 156 2,456,764.88 Kota Jakarta Selatan 144 2,049,088.43 Kota Jakarta Barat 112 2,222,822.38 Kota Jakarta Pusat 51 948,160.34 Bogor 164 899,878.47 Kota Bogor 60 604,988.31 Kota Depok 93 1,062,996.60 Tangerang 105 206,458.31 Kota Tangerang 87 1,054,938.09 Kota Tangerang Selatan 80 840,183.19 Bekasi 82 559,526.51 Kota Bekasi 73 1,180,666.94 Total 15,308,177.23 Ratio to total Greater Jakarta 51% population (%) INDICATOR 4 INDICATOR -4 Public transport quality and reliability INDICATOR -4 INDICATOR Source: GJTA Primary Survey, 2017 Source: Japtrapis, 2012 Source: GJTA Primary Survey, 2017 INDICATOR 5 INDICATOR -5 Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants 1,200 Seriously Material Loss 1,000 Year No of Accidents Fatalities Injured Injured (Rp. Mio) 2010 8,235 1,048 3,473 5,820 17,744 800 2011 8,079 1,008 2,820 6,312 18,102 y = -49.279x + 100000 2012 8,020 912 2,938 6,153 21,885 600 R² = 0.6049 2013 6,498 676 2,925 4,711 23,794 fatalities 2014 6,574 605 3,088 568 23,149 400 Source: Traffic Police, 2015 200 Fatalities by Mode - 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 INDICATOR -5 INDICATOR Fatalities Jakarta (Polda Metro as Jabodetabek minus Kab. Bogor and Kab. Tangerang) Car Truck No. of fatalities= 605. Population= 30 mio. Bus Motorcycle Traffic Fatalities per 100.000= Statistical Bureau from Jakarta Metro Police (2015) 605/(30.000.000/100.000)= 2.1 INDICATOR 6 INDICATOR -6 Affordability – travel costs as part of Income Average Daily Spending by Mode Bus : Rp. 30,271 (around $ 2.33) Private Car : Rp. 121,049 ($ 9.31) Taxi : Rp. 89,574 ($ 6.89) Rail : Rp. 30,712 ($ 2.36) Motor Cycle : Rp. 26,931 ($ 2.07) Average : Rp. 53,453 ($ 4.11) Monthly transport expenditure is $4.11x25 days= $ 102.75 Greater Jakarta Transport Authority Survey, 2017 INDICATOR -6 INDICATOR Average Monthly Income Jakarta : $ 14,727 West Java : $ 2,538 Banten : $ 3,115 The transport cost from monthly income Average : $ 6,793 = $ 102.75/ $ 566 Average monthly income: $ 566 = 18.2%. Statistical Bureau, 2016 INDICATOR -7 INDICATOR 7 Operational costs of the public transport System The study from BPTJ (2017) from 29 routes of large buses in Greater Jakarta shows that : 6 routes of Trans Jakarta are subsidised by Jakarta govt. the tariff of Rp. 3,500 is under the operating cost of Rp. 11,000 9 routes operates by private that tariff is same as operation cost, mostly operate by PT.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy's Significance On
    International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research Volume 02 Number 01 | June 2018 p-issn: 2581-1347 | e-issn: 2580-2607 | Pg. 01 - 14 ‘Tragedy’ and Space of Commemoration: An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy’s Significance on Jakarta’s Urban Space Feby Hendola1 1 Departement of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT A City does not only exist with its physical feature but also with its intangible thing within it, including the people’s memory. Our memory, either it is delightful or unpleasant, plays a role in molding our perception about our environment. Meanwhile, we also tend to build something—to construct our environment—for commemorating significant events. Regarding this phenomenon, this paper aimed to understand how a tragic event affects urban space by examining conceptions of “tragedy” and “absential feature” and their relation to space of commemoration. As a reflection of the conceptual inquiry, this paper analyzed how Semanggi Tragedy, which had happened on 1998-1999, affected Jakarta’s urban space. The study showed that the tragedy brought ‘absence’ that urges people to create a tangible feature to response their grief, loss, and hopes. Semanggi’s physical development—as a way to move on—only emphasizes the ‘absence’ of the tragedy and does not stop people not to forget it. © 2018 IJBESR. All rights reserved. Keywords: absential feature, 1998 riots, semanggi tragedy, space of commemoration, urban conflicts 1. Introduction sense, to remember is not merely to be nostalgic but also to feel ‘emptiness’ that does and will A City does not only exist with its physical continually exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Jakarta Area (Jabodetabek) Indonesia
    DATA COLLECTION REPORT Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Asian Cities GREATER JAKARTA AREA (JABODETABEK) INDONESIA Dr. Muhammad Nanang Prayudyanto (Consultant) Dr. Muiz Thohir (GJTA) 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current state of urban transport systems and service ...................................................................... 7 3. Data collection approach for SUTI ................................................................................................... 11 4. Data for SUTI (key data – detail in Excel sheet) ............................................................................... 12 a. Indicator 1 Extent to which transport plans cover facilities for active modes and public transport ...................................................................................................................................... 12 b. Indicator 2. Modal Share of Active and Public Transport in Commuting ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Living in Southeast Asia
    Appreciating Asian modern : mASEANa Project 2015-2020 mASEANa Project 2017 modern living in Southeast Asia The Report of mASEANa Project 2017 4th & 5th International Conference 2015 - 2020 The Report of mASEANa project 2017 : 4th & 5th International Conference modern living in Southeast Asia Introduction Why Are We So Interested in modern architecture in Asia? -The Story behind mASEANa Project 2015-20 and a Report on its Fiscal 2017 Activities- Shin Muramatsu 09 The Housing Question Ana Tostões 11 CONTENTS Part1: modern living in Southeast Asia Part2: Inventory of modern Buildings modern living in Southeast Asia - Inventory of modern Buildings in Yangon - Setiadi Sopandi, Kengo Hayashi 16 History of modern architecture in Yangon Friedrich Silaban Inventory & Research, 2006-2018 Win Thant Win Shwin, Su Su 65 Setiadi Sopandi 18 Inventory of modern Buildings in Yangon 67 - 1. Sports and Modern Urbanisim - - Inventory of modern Buildings in Jakarta - The Role of Sports Facilities in Metro Manila’s Urban Living from the 1930s to 1970s History of modern architecture in Jakarta Gabriel Victor Caballero 22 Setiadi Sopandi, Nadia Purwestri 77 The Shape of Sports Diplomacy: Inventory of modern Buildings in Jakarta 79 Gelora Bung Karno, Jakarta, and the Fourth Asian Games Robin Hartanto 26 Modern Architecture Literacy Development: The mASEANa Project in 2017 Kengo Hayashi 88 PHNOM PENH 1964: Architecture and Urbanism of GANEFO Masaaki Iwamoto 30 Transformation of modern Living in Japan after WWII: Washington Heights, Tokyo Olympic and Yoyogi Sports Complex Saikaku Toyokawa 34 Acknowledgment 92 - 2. Modern Projects, Changing Lifestyles, Resilience - Living in KTTs – the Formation of Modern Community in Vietnam Pham Thuy Loan, Truong Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Manh Tri 36 Pulomas: A Social Housing Project which Never Was Mohammad Nanda Widyarta 40 Modernization of Tatami, Shoji, & En Yasuko Kamei 44 Collective Housing in Japan Toshio Otsuki 48 - 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Carbon Management Into Development Strategies of Cities
    Asia‐Pacific Network for Global Change Research IInntteeggrraattiinngg ccaarrbboonn mmaannaaggeemmeenntt iinnttoo ddeevveellooppmmeenntt ssttrraatteeggiieess ooff cciittiieess –– eessttaabblliisshhiinngg aa nneettwwoorrkk ooff ccaassee ssttuuddiieess ooff uurrbbaanniissaattiioonn iinn tthhee AAssiiaa--PPaacciiffiicc Final report for APN project 2004-07-CMY-Lasco The following collaborators worked on this project: Rodel Lasco (PI), CIFOR, Philippines, [email protected] Louis Lebel (co-PI), USER, Thailand, [email protected] Agus Sari, PELANGI, Indonesia, [email protected] A.P. Mitra, National Physical Laboratory, India,[email protected] Nguyen Hoang Tri, CERE, Vietnam, [email protected] Ooi Giok Ling, National Institute of Education, Singapore,[email protected] Antonio Contreras, De La Salle University,Philippines, [email protected] Integrating carbon management into development Integrating carbon management into the development strategies of cities – establishing a network of case studies of urbanisation in the Asia-Pacific 2004-07-CMY-Lasco Final Report submitted to APN ©Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research 2 Integrating carbon management into the development strategies of cities Overview of project work and outcomes Non-technical summary The way urbanization unfolds will have a profound implication for future growth in energy use and emissions, and consequently, global environmental change. Cities offer many potential environmental protection benefits, arising from efficiencies in transport, energy used in cooling and heating, as well as opportunities to sequester additional carbon on land release from use by denser human settlements. On the other hand, cities have often been centres of wasteful consumption and serious air pollution problems. This project drew on past and on-going research efforts on emissions and urban management in Asia to establish a new set of coordinated case studies of New Delhi, Jakarta, Manila, Ho Chi Minh City and Chiang Mai.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Completion Report
    Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs Republic of Indonesia JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 07: Report on TOD-Related Laws, Plans, and Regulations October 2019 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) ALMEC Corporation I N J R 2 0 - 0 0 4 JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 07: Report on TOD-Related Laws, Plans, and Regulations Table of Contents Chapter 1 Review of Upper Laws, Regulations and Plans.......................................................... 1 1.1 Review of Upper Laws and Organization ........................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Development Related Laws .............................................................................................. 8 1.1.2 Spatial Planning Related Laws ....................................................................................... 12 1.1.3 Transportation Related Laws .......................................................................................... 16 1.2 Review of Development Plan Document ........................................................................ 20 1.2.1 National Mid-term Development Plan Year 2015-2019 ................................................ 20 1.2.2 Regional Mid-term Plan ................................................................................................. 21 1.2.3 Local Mid-term Plan......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHADOWS and CLOUDS Human Rights in Indonesia – Shady Legacy, Uncertain Future
    SHADOWS AND CLOUDS Human Rights in Indonesia – shady legacy, uncertain future of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security December 2010 N°552a H SHADOWS AND CLOUDS Human Rights in Indonesia – shady legacy, uncertain future © Holt Rinehart Winston World Atlas Cover: © courtesy of KontraS Ho Kim Ngo, mother of one of the 16 student activists who were allegedly killed by the Police in the 1999 Semanggi II incident, calling on the government to deliver justice for her son.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Seizes Opportunities Kuat Di Tengah Tantangan, Solid Meraih Peluang
    LAPORAN TAHUNAN ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Strong Amid the Challenges Solid Seizes Opportunities Kuat Di Tengah Tantangan, Solid Meraih Peluang PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk 2 TENTANG LAPORAN TAHUNAN About the Annual Report Selamat datang pada Laporan Tahunan PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Welcome to the PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk Annual Report Tbk 2020 dengan tema “Strong Amid the Challenges, Solid Seizes 2020 with the theme “Strong Amid the Challenges, Solid Seizes Opportunities”. Tema tersebut dipilih berdasarkan analisis dan Opportunities”. This theme was chosen after in-depth analysis kajian yang mendalam berdasarkan fakta dan perkembangan and study of the facts and business development of PT Wijaya bisnis PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk di sepanjang 2020 serta Karya (Persero) Tbk in 2020 and the future business continuity of masa depan keberlanjutan bisnis PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk. PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk. Laporan Tahunan PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk 2020 diterbitkan The PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk 2020 Annual Report is issued sesuai dengan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 29/ in accordance with the Financial Services Authority Regulation POJK.04/2016 tentang Laporan Tahunan Emiten atau Perusahaan No. 29/POJK.04/2016 concerning Annual Reports of Issuers or Publik dan Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 30/ Public Companies and the Financial Services Authority Circular SEOJK.04/2016 Tentang Bentuk dan Isi Laporan Tahunan Emiten No. 30/SEOJK.04/2016 concerning the Form and Content of Atau Perusahaan Publik. Issuers or Public
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy’ and Space of Commemoration: an Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy’S Significance on Jakarta’S Urban Space
    International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research Volume 02 Number 01 | June 2018 p-issn: 2581-1347 | e-issn: 2580-2607 | Pg. 01 - 14 ‘Tragedy’ and Space of Commemoration: An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy’s Significance on Jakarta’s Urban Space Feby Hendola1 1 Departement of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT A City does not only exist with its physical feature but also with its intangible thing within it, including the people’s memory. Our memory, either it is delightful or unpleasant, plays a role in molding our perception about our environment. Meanwhile, we also tend to build something—to construct our environment—for commemorating significant events. Regarding this phenomenon, this paper aimed to understand how a tragic event affects urban space by examining conceptions of “tragedy” and “absential feature” and their relation to space of commemoration. As a reflection of the conceptual inquiry, this paper analyzed how Semanggi Tragedy, which had happened on 1998-1999, affected Jakarta’s urban space. The study showed that the tragedy brought ‘absence’ that urges people to create a tangible feature to response their grief, loss, and hopes. Semanggi’s physical development—as a way to move on—only emphasizes the ‘absence’ of the tragedy and does not stop people not to forget it. © 2018 IJBESR. All rights reserved. Keywords: absential feature, 1998 riots, semanggi tragedy, space of commemoration, urban conflicts 1. Introduction sense, to remember is not merely to be nostalgic but also to feel ‘emptiness’ that does and will A City does not only exist with its physical continually exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakarta Floating Park
    FINAL PROJECT – RA.141581 RESHAPING URBAN SPACIOUSNESS: JAKARTA FLOATING PARK FAUZAN PERMANA NOOR 08111440000037 Supervisor Endy Yudho Prasetyo S.T., M.T. Departement of Architecture Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember 2018 FINAL PROJECT – RA.141581 RESHAPING URBAN SPACIOUSNESS: JAKARTA FLOATING PARK FAUZAN PERMANA NOOR 08111440000037 Supervisor Endy Yudho Prasetyo S.T., M.T. Departement of Architecture Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember 2018 RESHAPING URBAN SPACIOUSNESS : JAKARTA FLOATING PARK Fauzan Permana Reg. no : 08111440000037 ABSTRACT Acting as a Capital of Indonesia, Jakarta has become a core of government, economy, commerce, also cultural hustle of the country. Occupied by 14,464 habitants per km2, its density is twice more than Tokyo, creating a bustling metropolis. The needs of living, commuting and productivity spaces slowly degrading the Green Open Spaces of the city, thus lowering the quality of the city space itself from 32% in 1965 to 9,8% in 2017. Ironically, the active & dense area of downtown Jakarta where the necessity of green spaces are the highest, are the one where such spaces cannot be found. An intervention therefore needed to refine the city spaces. Implementing 3-dimensional approach on one of the core of Jakarta’s downtown area, harmonious with government encouraging a development of walkable city and transit-oriented development, architecture should be able to escalate the quality of space in Jakarta. The design resulted in a simple intervention in the city, if placed accurately would not only improve the space quality but also integrating areas fractured by other elements of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Summary
    No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) COORDINATING MINISTRY FOR ECONOMIC AFFAIRS THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE STUDY ON TRADE RELATED SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES IN THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA FINAL REPORT SUMMARY March 2005 JAPAN PORT CONSULTANTS LTD., (JPC) PACIFIC CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL (PCI) ED JR 05-036 THE STUDY ON TRADE RELATED SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES IN THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA FINAL REPORT SUMMARY March 2005 Preface The Government of Japan adopted a request by the Government of Indonesia to conduct a study on trade-related systems and procedure focusing on the capital area. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) was mandated to undertake the study. A study team, consisted by Japan Port Consultants, Ltd (JPC) and Pacific Consultants International (PCI), was sent four times from February 2004 through March 2005. The team, headed by Mr. YAMASHITA Ikuhiko (JPC) held discussions with officials concerned in the Government of Indonesia, hearings from private sector, and field study including trade process time survey. This report was compiled by the team in accordance with comments raised by steering committee members of the Government of Indonesia. It is expected that the report is utilized for further trade facilitation. Lastly I would like to express my sincere appreciation to all those who participated in this study and hope this joint study promotes relationships between Japan and Indonesia. March 2005 IZAWA Tadashi Vice-President Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL March 2005 Mr. Izawa Tadashi Japan International Cooperation Agency Vice-President Dear Sir It is my great pleasure to submit herewith the Final Report of “The Study on Trade Related Systems and Procedures in The Republic of Indonesia”.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Circular
    IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS OFFERING IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS WHO ARE OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before continuing. The following applies to this Offering Memorandum (the “Offering Memorandum”), and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of this Offering Memorandum. In accessing this Offering Memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them, any time you receive any information as a result of such access. You acknowledge that access to this Offering Memorandum is intended for use by you only and you agree that you will not forward or otherwise provide access to any other person. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE OR SOLICITATION IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS. THIS OFFERING MEMORANDUM MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER PERSON AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS OFFERING MEMORANDUM IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORIZED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAW OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction SR
    Strong Foundation For the Next Levels Sustainability Report 2020 Intiland. Developing your world. www.intiland.com Introduction Our Approach Major Events Our Environment Our People Our Customers Our Community GRI & POJK Content Index Table Of Contents Introduction Our Approach 4 Sustainability Highlights Major Events in 2020 and Its Impacts on Businesses and Intiland About Intiland Our Environment Report Period and Boundaries Our People Message from Founder and CEO Our Customers Our Supply Chain Our Community Key Financial Performance GRI & POJK Content Index PT Intiland Development Tbk - Sustainability Report 2020 Introduction Our Approach Major Events Our Environment Our People Our Customers Our Community GRI & POJK Content Index Sustainability Highlights Rp 2.89 trillion Rp 778 billion 81% Water Savings 28% Energy Savings Blue Rating Consolidated revenue in 2020 Consolidated operating EDGE Certified, Green Building EDGE Certified, Green Building for Ngoro Industrial Park in managing profit in 2020 Council Indonesia, for South Council Indonesia, for the environment from Ministry Quarter – Tower A, B and C South Quarter – Tower A, B and C. of Environment and Forestry. Top Ten Developers 32% Less Embodied Top CSR Radius 1,000 km BCI Asia Awards 2020 Energy in Material Awards Star 3 Gold Rating forLocal Suppliers PT Intiland Development Tbk is EDGE Certified, Green Building for Design Recognition of for PT Intiland Development Tbk in 2020 Based on GBCI’s Greenships, South one of the top ten developers in Council Indonesia, for South South Quarter from Green Building for compliance to ISO 26000, good Quarter implements the principles Indonesia that has made the Quarter – Tower A, B and C.
    [Show full text]