Results Chapter 3 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Results Chapter 3 A RESULTS CHAPTER 3 A RESULTS INTRODUCTION, IDENTIFICATION AND MORPHOMETRY 3A.1 VEGETATION IN THE STUDY AREA The trees found in the habitats occupied by the owl vary with geographical locality and distribution range. In the study area, which is located on the Deccan plateau, I recorded following scrub vegetation in the areas occupied by the owl: Acacia nilotica, A. polyacantha, A. catechu, A. chundra, A. auriculiformes, A. tomentosa, Ziziphus sp., Holoptelea integrifolia, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Phyllanthus emblica and P. distichus, Bombax ceiba, Sterculia urens, Ailanthus excelsa, etc. Cropland is often interspersed with Azadirachta indica, Syzygium cumini, Mangifera indica, Tamarindus indica, Annona squamosa, A. reticulata, Achras sapota, Eucalyptus sp., Michelia champaca, Grewia tiliifolia, Aegel marmelos, Feronia elephantum, Melia azederach, Sapindus laurifolius. Cassia sp., Dalbergia latifolia, Memecylon umbellatum, Lagerstroemia sp. Millingtonia hortensis, Tectona grandis, Santalum album, Jatropha curcas, Bambusa arundinaceae, Dendrocalamus strictus, Asclepiadaceae sp. On coastal areas, Anacardium occidentale, Garcinia indica, Albizia lebbeck, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Cassurina litorea, Borassus flabellifer, Caryota sp. Pandanus tectorius, Cocos sp. etc. were seen. In the Indian Eagle Owl's Deccan plateau habitat, the xerophilous grasslands are composed of grasses belonging to species of Eragrosits, Aristida, Heteropogon, Apluda, Chloris, etc. Owls were seen frequenting suitable habitats with mesophilous grasses like Andropogon, Digitaria. Pennisetum, Themeda, Pancium, Setaria and to some extent hygrophilus grasses like Arundo, Hygrorhyza, Saccharum, Erianthus and Phragmites sp. In coastal areas the Indian Eagle-Owl was rarely seen on hilly coastlines near littoral vegetation like Rhizophora, Sonneratia, Avicena, sp. where the trees are sparse. On the coasts it sheltered under Spinifex squamosus, a gregarious sand binding grass or on Casuarina equisetifolia trees. In a large expanse of grassy plains with few low hills and devoid of tall trees, the Indian Eagle-Owl often perched on ground concealed in tall grass under the shade of a short Acacia tree. (Plate 9). 3A.2 THE CROP PATTERN In the study area the crop of wheat {Triticum aestivum), rice (Oryza sativa), jowar (Sorghum vulgare), nachani (Eleusine coracana) was harvested in late March or early April and rodents gleaned the scattered grain from the fields. The fields were again ploughed towards end of April for the next wet season and kept fallow till the first monsoon showers in June or July, when new seed was sown. So also, the crops such as green leafy vegetables, onion, groundnut, lentil, tomato, beans, green peas and horticultural products were cultivated. After this yield, one more yield of grain was obtained only in well irrigated areas. Acanthaceae, Asteraceae and Fabaceae shrubs appeared in favourable season and these were the hiding places for the owl. In summer, the much of the landscape became parched, barren and significantly devoid of Hfe forms. I saw that the resident Indian Eagle Owl often inhabited places where at least some type of a permanent water source remained throughout the year where continuous supply of food was assured. 3A.3 THE CLIMATE The average annual precipitation in the study area is derived from the SW monsoon, and it ranged from 250 - 1250 mm in the study area on the Deccan plateau and 1500 - 3500 mm in the study area on the coastal region. The temperature ranged between 6° C and 40" C during winter and summer respectively. Three well-defined seasons were 33 experienced in the habitats occupied by the Indian Eagle Owl. These are monsoon or the rainy season, winter and summer. 1. Monsoon: In the study area, during the monsoon (June to September), the arid terrain occupied by this owl become green and puddles, ponds and streams appear temporarily. The dry nullahs, streams, rivulets, water tanks and other perennial water bodies received their share of water. The green cover remained from mid June and the habitat resumed the parched yellow brown colour by late September. Then the black soil in cropland and in dry water bodies got fissured and several holes and burrows of rodents become visible and get exposed. The sand banks, gravel beds, stones, pebbles and Indians in riverbeds were exposed and became hot at noon. The average rainfall in coastal region, during the study period was normal. However, during 2005-06 and 2006-07 the study area in Pune and Solapur districts experienced a drought. 2. Winter: In the study area I observed that during early winter, respite from hot October temperature is obtained at night when activity of rodents and geckos is striking in this terrain. In mid winter, mornings were foggy. An occasional water hole remained filled and was surrounded by a thin rim of wooded area and it is in this cover that the owl was encountered. By October, the green grass in the open countryside became yellow. 3. Summer: In summer, from March onwards, the grass became prickly with thousands of thin loose clumps of filamentous darts with a reverse spike near the pointed end. They readily attached themselves to anyone who passed through the grass, a vegetative instrument for seed dispersal. The grassland became temporarily hostile to access due to this awn. Later, large areas of grassy pastures became denuded due to cutting or grazing by domestic cattle and sheep. The land became hardened and 34 the hot winds that blew at noon, collected surface dust and grit, and assumed the form of anticyclones or dust storms, depending on local temperatures and topography. 3A.4 A. THE GEOLOGY Laterite soil, mountain soil, red and black soils, gray and brown soils, sub-montane soil, desert soil and alluvial soils are seen in the various habitats in the distribution of the Indian Eagle Owl. Sedimentary rocks are seen towards north, igneous rocks in the Deccan and metamorphic rocks are seen in the southern part of its distribution. The Narmada-Tapi trough is sandwiched by the Deccan lavas, which in turn are encompassed by the Peninsular block with interspersed Gondwana trough in the regions occupied by this owl (Alfred et al, 2001). 3A.4 B. BIOGEOGRAPHIC ZONE AND AGROCLIMATIC ZONE The bio-geographic zones in the study area are the 'Deccan Plateau' in Pune and Solapur districts and the 'West Coast' in the Raigad and Ratnagiri districts (Roger and Panwar, 1988), while the agro-chmatic regions are 'Western Plateau and Hills Region' and 'West Coast Plains and Hills Region' respectively (Ghosh 1991). 3A.5 NEST CENSUS AND SPACING Mean distance between neighboring territories as calculated by the NND method was 3.28 km (0.9 - 6.47 km, sd = 1.45, n = 34). I found that the nests were uniformly dispersed in the region (G-tQst = 0.68). The closest distance between two nests of the breeding Indian Eagle Owls in adjacent territories recorded by me was 110 m where the nests of two pairs in adjacent territories were at the extreme but approximated ends of their respective home ranges. I saw that more than one home range often converged on one water source in arid habitats and hence such nests were close to one another. The several nests of a single pair within one territory were sometimes close, separated by only one meter, ans they were at times as flirther apart as 500 m. 3^ 3A.6 HABITAT CHARCTERIZATION AROUND NEST SITES 3A.6 A. Habitat types around nest sites 44 active nest sites were identified in the study area. Agricultural land, scrubland, grassland, water body, hilly areas, and human habitation were the six habitat types around the 44 nest sites in the study area. These habitats were characterized in a 1000 m circle around each nest by 'Look-Down Method' of visual survey as described earlier. Relative percent of each habitat around each nest site was recorded (Table 4). (Plate 10). 3A.6 B. Percent distribution of habitat types around nest site In the analysis of the various habitat types in the 1000 m radius centered at the nest, I found that agricultural land was the predominant habitat (Av. 30.9+17.4%, 10-75%), followed by grassland (Av. 21.9±18.5%, 0-60%), scrubland (Av. 15.0±8%, 5-40%), human habitation (Av. 14.0±7.4%, 0-40%), hilly area (Av. 9.6±5.5%, 0-25%) and water body (Av. =7.6+6%, 0-20%). All the nest sites were located either in hilly areas on cUffs or near water bodies in earth cuttings, while open habitats like agricultural land, scrubland and grassland were used as foraging areas. The observations are presented in a tabular form in Table 4. 3A.7 IDENTIFICATION OF INDIAN EAGLE OWL 3A.7 A. Description: (Plate 7). The Indian Eagle Owl is a large owl, dark brown in colour, with prominent streaking and mottling on plumage and the jizz with a vertical stout body and erect horns on the crown. I have recorded the following features of this owl through the spotting scope. Above, head and neck are tawny, yellow and appear bright in good Ught. Facial disc is whitish, eyebrows black and ruff dark brown and edged with fulvous. Large forwardly directed eyes with orange-yellow iris gives the bird a feline look. The iris appears 36 bright yellow in sunlight and orange in flashlight. Pupils are black and appear bright red or maroon in flash photography depending on the angle of the flash source. Forehead is dark brown to black with thin pale markings, becoming bright in breeding plumage. The aigrettes or horns are dark brown in front with fulvous edge and pale behind. Feathers have long, wide streaks of deep brown. Rest of the body plumage is rich brown with mottled and barred pattern of fLilvous colour on back and whitish wash on wing coverts and tertiary feathers. Quills are deep tawny, brown barred and dusky at tips.
Recommended publications
  • PLAGUE STUDIES * 6. Hosts of the Infection R
    Bull. Org. mond. Sante 1 Bull. World Hlth Org. 1952, 6, 381-465 PLAGUE STUDIES * 6. Hosts of the Infection R. POLLITZER, M.D. Division of Epidemiology, World Health Organization Manuscript received in April 1952 RODENTS AND LAGOMORPHA Reviewing in 1928 the then rather limited knowledge available concerning the occurrence and importance of plague in rodents other than the common rats and mice, Jorge 129 felt justified in drawing a clear-cut distinction between the pandemic type of plague introduced into human settlements and houses all over the world by the " domestic " rats and mice, and " peste selvatique ", which is dangerous for man only when he invades the remote endemic foci populated by wild rodents. Although Jorge's concept was accepted, some discussion arose regarding the appropriateness of the term " peste selvatique" or, as Stallybrass 282 and Wu Lien-teh 318 translated it, " selvatic plague ". It was pointed out by Meyer 194 that, on etymological grounds, the name " sylvatic plague " would be preferable, and this term was widely used until POzzO 238 and Hoekenga 105 doubted, and Girard 82 denied, its adequacy on the grounds that the word " sylvatic" implied that the rodents concerned lived in forests, whereas that was rarely the case. Girard therefore advocated the reversion to the expression "wild-rodent plague" which was used before the publication of Jorge's study-a proposal it has seemed advisable to accept for the present studies. Much more important than the difficulty of adopting an adequate nomenclature is that of distinguishing between rat and wild-rodent plague- a distinction which is no longer as clear-cut as Jorge was entitled to assume.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Biology of the Genus Rattus: Profile of an Archetypal Rodent Pest
    Bromadiolone resistance does not respond to absence of anticoagulants in experimental populations of Norway rats. Heiberg, A.C.; Leirs, H.; Siegismund, Hans Redlef Published in: <em>Rats, Mice and People: Rodent Biology and Management</em> Publication date: 2003 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Heiberg, A. C., Leirs, H., & Siegismund, H. R. (2003). Bromadiolone resistance does not respond to absence of anticoagulants in experimental populations of Norway rats. In G. R. Singleton, L. A. Hinds, C. J. Krebs, & D. M. Spratt (Eds.), Rats, Mice and People: Rodent Biology and Management (Vol. 96, pp. 461-464). Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 SYMPOSIUM 7: MANAGEMENT—URBAN RODENTS AND RODENTICIDE RESISTANCE This file forms part of ACIAR Monograph 96, Rats, mice and people: rodent biology and management. The other parts of Monograph 96 can be downloaded from <www.aciar.gov.au>. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research 2003 Grant R. Singleton, Lyn A. Hinds, Charles J. Krebs and Dave M. Spratt, 2003. Rats, mice and people: rodent biology and management. ACIAR Monograph No. 96, 564p. ISBN 1 86320 357 5 [electronic version] ISSN 1447-090X [electronic version] Technical editing and production by Clarus Design, Canberra 431 Ecological perspectives on the management of commensal rodents David P. Cowan, Roger J. Quy* and Mark S. Lambert Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UNITED KINGDOM *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract. The need to control Norway rats in the United Kingdom has led to heavy reliance on rodenticides, particu- larly because alternative methods do not reduce rat numbers as quickly or as efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodent Control in India
    Integrated Pest Management Reviews 4: 97–126, 1999. © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Rodent control in India V.R. Parshad Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India (Tel.: 91-0161-401960, ext. 382; Fax: 91-0161-400945) Received 3 September 1996; accepted 3 November 1998 Key words: agriculture, biological control, campaign, chemosterilent, commensal, control methods, economics, environmental and cultural methods, horticulture, India, pest management, pre- and post-harvest crop losses, poultry farms, rodent, rodenticide, South Asia, trapping Abstract Eighteen species of rodents are pests in agriculture, horticulture, forestry, animal and human dwellings and rural and urban storage facilities in India. Their habitat, distribution, abundance and economic significance varies in different crops, seasons and geographical regions of the country. Of these, Bandicota bengalensis is the most predominant and widespread pest of agriculture in wet and irrigated soils and has also established in houses and godowns in metropolitan cities like Bombay, Delhi and Calcutta. In dryland agriculture Tatera indica and Meriones hurrianae are the predominant rodent pests. Some species like Rattus meltada, Mus musculus and M. booduga occur in both wet and dry lands. Species like R. nitidus in north-eastern hill region and Gerbillus gleadowi in the Indian desert are important locally. The common commensal pests are Rattus rattus and M. musculus throughout the country including the islands. R. rattus along with squirrels Funambulus palmarum and F. tristriatus are serious pests of plantation crops such as coconut and oil palm in the southern peninsula. F. pennanti is abundant in orchards and gardens in the north and central plains and sub-mountain regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Captura De Una Rata Bandicota Menor Bandicota Bengalensis (Rodentia
    Revista peruana de biología 26(4): 525 - 528 (2019) A capture of a lesser bandicoot rat Bandicota doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v26i4.16881 ISSN-L 1561-0837; eISSN: 1727-9933 bengalensis (Rodentia, Muridae) at Callao Port, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Perú: anecdotal record or potential invasive alien species? Captura de una rata bandicota menor Bandicota bengalensis Nota científica (Rodentia, Muridae) en el puerto de Callao, Perú: ¿registro Presentado: 14/10/2019 anecdótico o especie exótica invasora? Aceptado: 13/11/2019 Publicado online: 16/12/2019 Correspondencia: *Corresponding author: Víctor Pacheco [email protected] Víctor Pacheco, Museo de Historia Natural, Uni- Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Museo de Historia Natural, Lima, Perú. versidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto 15072, Peru. de Ciencias Biológicas “Antonio Raimondi”, Lima, Peru. Abstract Otros datos de los autores / biografía: ORCID: 0000-0002-1005-135X The Lesser bandicoot rat Bandicota bengalensis (Gray and Hardwicke, 1833) is a Group DIVERSIDAD DE MAMÍFEROS Y SUS PARÁ- murid rodent distributed mostly in Asia that can cause substantial negative economic SITOS (DIMAPA) impact in urban and rural areas. Until now, the species has been mostly restricted to the Asian region; and no specimen has been captured or reported as a stowaway arriving to an American port. Here, I report on one specimen captured in Callao’s maritime port, Peru, during sanitary inspection surveillance, identified based on external and cranial characteristics, and similar meristic reported values. This finding shows the potential threat of this species as an invasive alien species and highlights the need for strengthening invasive species protocols on ships.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2000 Members of RISCINSA -- October 2000
    Newsletter of the Rodentia, Insectivora, Scandentia Conservation & Information Network of South Asia RISCINSA for Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Volume I, Number I October 2000 Members of RISCINSA -- October 2000 Babu, T. Raveendra Molur, Sanjay, Red List Advisor Samal, Bhubaneswar, Superintendent AICRP on Rodent Control Zoo Outreach Organisation, Box 1683 Orissa State Museum College of Agriculture, University of Ag Sci Peelamedu, Coimbatore 641 004 Bhubaneswar 751 014 GKVK, Bangalore 560 065 Mudappa, Divya Shankar, Kartik Borges, Dr. Renee Maria 8/356, Cooperative colony A1/4/4, 3rd Main Road Asst. Prof., Indian Institute of Science Valparai, Via Pollachi 642 127 Tamil Nadu Besant Nagar, Chennai Centre for Zoological Science, Bangalore 12 Manimozhi, Dr. A., Zoo Biologist Sheikher, Chander Chakraborty, Rina Arignar Annal Zoological Park Researcher, Dept. of Entomology and Zoological Survey of India Vandalur, Chennai 600 048 Tamil Nadu Agriculture, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of F.P. S Building, 27 Jawaharlal Nehru Road Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, M. P. Calcutta 700 016 West Bengal Mukherjee, Shomen Ben-Gurion University of the Neger Sood, Pankaj Chakraborty, Sujit Blaustein Institute for Desert Research Department of Entomology Zoological Survey of India Mitrani Dept. of Desert Ecology UHF NAUNI (SOLAN) 'M' Block, New Alipore Sede Boker Campus 84990 Israel Himachal Pradesh 173 230 Calcutta, West Bengal 700 053 Muktha Bai, Krishnaji Rao Sridhara, Shakunthala Chakravarthy, Akshay Kumar, Entomologist Scientist, Food Protection and Infestation Professor & Head, AICRP on Rodent Control, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Control Dept, Central Food Technology University of Agricultural Sciences, College of Bangalore 560 065 Karnataka Research Institute (CFTRI) Agriculture GKVK, Bangalore 560 065 Mysore 570 013 Jordan, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Canis Aureus) in Agro-Ecosystems of Bangladesh
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service September 2007 Daytime cover, diet and space-use of golden jackals (Canis aureus) in agro-ecosystems of Bangladesh Michael M. Jaeger US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Emdadul Haque Bangladesh Agriculture Research Institute (BARI) Parvin Sultana Bangladesh Agriculture Research Institute (BARI) Richard L. Bruggers US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Jaeger, Michael M.; Haque, Emdadul; Sultana, Parvin; and Bruggers, Richard L., "Daytime cover, diet and space-use of golden jackals (Canis aureus) in agro-ecosystems of Bangladesh" (2007). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 701. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/701 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Article in press - uncorrected proof Mammalia (2007): 1–10 ᮊ 2007 by Walter de Gruyter • Berlin • New York. DOI 10.1515/MAMM.2007.016 Daytime cover, diet and space-use of golden jackals (Canis aureus) in agro-ecosystems of Bangladesh Michael M. Jaeger1,*, Emdadul Haque2, Parvin systems (e.g., Macdonald 1979) that are able to exist in Sultana2 and Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    OCCASION P PER No. 297 Records of the Zoological Survey of ndia Li t of valid Rodent taxa (Class: Ma malia, Order: Rodentia) from Indian Subcontinent includ· g Myanmar M.S. PRAD AN AND S.S. TALMALE ZOOLOGIC L SURVEY OF I ' DIA OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 297 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA List of valid Rodent taxa (Class: Mammalia, Order: Rodentia) from Indian Subcontinent including Myanmar M.S. PRADHANI AND S.S. TALMALE2 Zoological Survey of India Western Regional Centre, Vidyanagar, Sector 29, Rawet Road PCNTDA Post, Pune, Maharashtra 411 044 Email: [email protected][email protected] Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata ~m Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Pradhan, M.S. and Talmale, S.S. 2009. List of valid Rodent taxa (Class : Mammalia; Order : Rodentia) from Indian Subcontinent including Myanmar, Rec. zool. Surv. India, Gcc. Paper No. 297 : 1-239. (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published : October, 2009 ISBN J78-81-8171-224-0 t; Gnv!. of India, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No Part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed off without the publisher's consent, in a form of binding or cover other than that in which, it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • View and Narrative Synthesis of Rashid, K
    Tropical Ecology 58(3): 515–524, 2017 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology www.tropecol.com Small mammal community composition and abundance in rural human habitations of Pothwar, Pakistan SURRYA KHANAM*, MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ, AMJAD RASHID KAYANI, MUHAMMAD SAJID NADEEM, MIRZA AZHAR BEG Department of Zoology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan Abstract: To determine small mammal species composition, abundance and distribution in rural human habitations, a study was conducted in four village sites of Pothwar, Pakistan between 2012 and 2014. At each site, snap trapping was conducted on seasonal basis in three types of structures (village houses, shops, and farm houses) for four consecutive nights. Over 7,680 trap nights, a total of 746 small mammals, representing eight rodent species: house mouse (Mus musculus), black rat (Rattus rattus), Indian gerbil (Tatera indica), soft-furred field rat (Millardia meltada), Indian bush rat (Golunda ellioti), lesser bandicoot rat (Bandicota bengalensis), short-tailed bandicoot rat (Nesokia indica), and little Indian field mouse (Mus booduga) and one insectivore species house shrew (Suncus murinus) were captured. House mouse was the most abundant and widely distributed species in the area, and showed seasonal variation in its abundance with the higher rate of capture in the winter. Black rat was the second most abundant species, but was captured from three of the four village sites. House shrew was the third most abundant and widely distributed species. Field rodents such as, Indian gerbil, soft-furred field rat, Indian bush rat, lesser bandicoot, short-tailed bandicoot rat, and little Indian field mouse were captured in the village structures, but in small numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Spotted Eagle Pallid Harrier Mallards | Vol
    VOL. 8 NO. 2 Indian Spotted Eagle Pallid Harrier | Vol. 8 No. 2 | Vol. Mallards RDS I B Indian Indian BIRDS CONTENTS www.indianbirds.in VOL. 8 NO. 2 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 18 MARCH 2013 29 On the breeding biology of the Indian Spotted Eagle Aquila hastata ISSN 0973-1407 Niranjan Sant, Vidhyadhar Shelke & Shridhar Shelke EDITOR EMERITUS: Zafar Futehally Some observations of the Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus EDITOR: Aasheesh Pittie 33 from Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan, India [email protected] Ashok Verma & Deepali Sharma ASSOCIATE EDITORS: V. Santharam, Praveen J. EDITORIAL BOARD 37 Recovery of breeding Mallards Anas platyrhynchos Maan Barua, Anwaruddin Choudhury in Kashmir, India Bill Harvey, Farah Ishtiaq, Rajah Jayapal Fayaz Ahmad Ahanger, G. Mustafa Shah & Ulfat Jan Madhusudan Katti, R. Suresh Kumar Taej Mundkur, Rishad Naoroji, Suhel Quader 39 Population status of Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala and Harkirat Singh Sangha, C. Sashikumar Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus in southern S. Subramanya, K. S. Gopi Sundar Rajasthan, India CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Vijay Kumar Koli, Mohammed Yaseen & Chhaya Bhatnagar Ragupathy Kannan, Lavkumar Khachar Status of Rufous-necked Laughingthrush Dryonastes ruficollis CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS 42 in Nepal Clement Francis, Ramki Sreenivasan Hem Sagar Baral, Dhan Bahadur Chaudhary & Hem Subedi EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Sharada Annamaraju LAYOUT & COVER DESIGN: K. Jayaram 44 Streaked Shearwater Calonectris leucomelas from Kannur coast, Kerala OffICE: P. Rambabu Dipu Karuthedathu, Muhamed Jafer Palot, Praveen J., NEW ORNIS FOUNDATION P. P. Sreenivasan & K. V. Uthaman Registration No. 314/2004 46 First record of Bean Goose Anser fabalis from TRUSTEES Uttarakhand, India Zafar Futehally, Aasheesh Pittie Anushree Bhattacharjee V. Santharam, Rishad Naoroji Taej Mundkur, S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Checklist of Indian Mammals FINAL.Pmd
    CHECKLIST OF INDIAN MAMMALS REVISED AND UPDATED 2008 417 species in 48 families Taxonomy and nomenclature as per Wilson & Reeder (2005) I. ORDER: PROBOSCIDEA 1) Family: Elephantidae (Elephants) 1. Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 Asian Elephant - I, SR, N, BH, BA, M, SE II. ORDER: SIRENIA 2) Family: Dugongidae (Dugong) 2. Dugong dugon (Müller, 1776) Dugong - I, PK(?), SR, M, BA, SE, P, ET, AU - Tropical coastal waters of Indian and W Pacific Ocean III. ORDER: SCANDENTIA 3) Family: Tupaiidae (Treeshrews) 3. Anathana ellioti (Waterhouse, 1850) Madras Treeshrew - I (EN) 4. Tupaia belangeri (Wagner, 1841) Northern Treeshrew - I, N, M, BA, SE, P 5. Tupaia nicobarica (Zelebor, 1869) Nicobar Treeshrew- I (EN) IV. ORDER: PRIMATES SUBORDER: STREPSIRRHINI 4) Family: Lorisidae (Lorises) 6. Loris lydekkerianus Cabrera, 1908 Gray Slender Loris - I, SR 7. Nycticebus bengalensis (Lacépède, 1800) Bengal Slow Loris - I, M, BA, SE, P SUBORDER: HAPLORRHINI 5) Family: Cercopithecidae (Old World monkeys) Subfamily: Cercopithecinae (Macaques) 8. Macaca arctoides (I. Geoffroy, 1831) Stump-tailed Macaque - I, SE, P 9. Macaca assamensis Mc Clelland, 1840 Assam Macaque - I, N, SE, P 10. Macaca fascicularis (Raffles, 1821) Crab-eating Macaque - I, M, SE 11. Macaca leonina (Blyth, 1863) Northern Pig-tailed Macaque - I, M, BA, SE, P 12. Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780) Rhesus Macaque - I, AF, PK, SE, P 13. Macaca munzala Sinha, Datta, Madhusudan and Mishra, 2005 Arunachal Macaque - I (EN) 14. Macaca radiata (É. Geoffroy, 1812) Bonnet Macaque - I (EN) 15. Macaca silenus (Linnaeus, 1758) Lion-tailed Macaque - I (EN) Subfamily: Colobinae (Langurs and Leaf-monkeys) 16. Semnopithecus ajax (Pocock, 1928) Kashmir Gray Langur - I, PK 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Damage by Vertebra Te Pests to Groundnuts in Pakistan
    CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE BY VERTEBRATE PESTS TO GROUNDNUTS IN PAKISTAN JOE E. BROOKS, Team Leader, Vertebraie Pest Control Project, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan, and Denver Wildlife Research Center, USDNAPH!S/ADC, P.O. Box 25266, Building 16, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225-0266. EJAZ AHMAD and IFflKHAR HUSSAIN, Research Scientists, Veriebrate Pest Control Project, National Agricultural Research Centre. Islamabad, Pakistan. ABSTRACT: Veriebrate pest damage to groundnut (Arachis hypogea} was assessed at harvest in 164 fields selected along road transects in Pakistan. Overall damage in these fields was estimated at 5.3%, of which the lesser bandicootrat<Bandicota henga!ensjslaccountedfor2.4%,theshort-tailedmQ!erat(Nesokiaimlil<ll)caused t.0%,andthewildboar(S.u£~caused 0.9%. Desert hares <l&mis njgricol!is>, crested porcupines (Hystrix imlil<ll) and house crows <Cows splendens) together accounted for the remaining 1.0% damage. The damage characteristics of each species are described. Observations indicated that visual above-ground examination of plants for damage underestimated the actual loss because both lesser bandicoot rats and mole rats often remove groundnut pods below ground without killing or otherwise damaging the plants. The yield loss based upon 5.3% damage would equal 67 kg of groundnut per hectare. Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf. (A.C. C"'bband R.E. Marsh,&!~). Primed at Univ. of C.lif., Davis. 13:129-133, 1988 INTRODUCTION (1971) estimated average losses of groundnut yield due to Groundnut (Arachis hypogeal is a major oilseed crop in field rats in three villages of50 kg per ha. Previous dala from Pakistan. It is grown as a cash crop by the farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]