DOCSLIB.ORG

C:\Documents and Settings\Rheitzma\My Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C:\Documents and Settings\Rheitzma\My Documents State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological and Water Quality Study of the Big Darby Creek Watershed, 2001/2002 Logan, Champaign, Union, Madison, Franklin and Pickaway Counties Greenside Darter Central Mottled Sculpin (Cottus bairdi bairdi) (Etheostoma blennioides Clubshell Mussel blennioides) (Pleurobema clava) Spotted Darter Eastern Banded Darter (Etheostoma maculatum) (Etheostoma zonale zonale) Helgrammite (Corydalus cornutus) Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus doloieui dolomieui) stonefly nymph mayfly nymph (Isonychia sp.) Bob Taft, Governor Christopher Jones, Director Biological and Water Quality Study of Big Darby Creek and Selected Tributaries 2001/2002 Logan, Champaign, Union, Madison, Franklin and Pickaway Counties, Ohio June 2004 Ohio EPA Technical Report EAS/2004-6-3 prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 122 South Front St., Columbus OH 43215 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus OH 43216-1049 Bob A Taft Governor, State of Ohio Christopher Jones Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency CONTENTS How To Use This Document.................................................. vii Notice to Users.............................................................. viii Acknowledgments .............................................................x Foreword ................................................................... xi Section A. General Study Discussion and Results A.1 Introduction.......................................................... A.1 A.2 Big Darby Creek Study Area Description ................................ A.10 A.2.1 Location / Size ..................................................A.10 A.2.2 Climate .......................................................A.10 A.2.3 Geology .......................................................A.13 A.2.4 Ecoregion ......................................................A.13 A.2.5 Groundwater ...................................................A.16 A.2.6 Soils ..........................................................A.16 A.2.7 Tributaries .....................................................A.19 A.2.8 Prairies / Wetlands ...............................................A.24 A.2.9 Land Use ......................................................A.29 A.2.10 Protected Lands .................................................A.32 A.2.11 Watershed Protection Funding Mechanisms - Non Point Source Pollution ................................................A.34 A.2.12 Local Government Structure - Land Use Planning ......................A.34 A.2.13 Conservation Programs - Practices ..................................A.36 A.3 Study Methods........................................................A.40 A.3.1 Determining Use Attainment Status .................................A.40 A.3.2 Habitat Assessment ..............................................A.41 A.3.3 Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment ...........................A.41 A.3.4 Fish Community Assessment ......................................A.42 A.3.5 Fish Tissue Assessment ...........................................A.42 A.3.6 Causal Associations ..............................................A.43 A.4 Summary of Findings by Data Type......................................A.44 A.4.1 Pollutant Loadings: 2001..........................................A.44 A.4.2 Spills and Wild Animal Kills in the Big Darby Creek Watershed: 1979-2002 ...........................................A.45 A.4.3 Chemical Water Quality ..........................................A.46 A.4.4 Datasonde™ Results .............................................A.53 A.4.5 Sediment Chemistry .............................................A.55 A.4.6 Instream and Riparian Habitat in Support of Aquatic Life ................A.57 i A.4.7 Macroinvertebrate Community .....................................A.66 A.4.7.1 Watershed Assessment ....................................A.66 A.4.7.2 Changes in Biological Community Performance: Macroinvertebrate Communities ............................A.77 A.4.7.3 Drainage Area Comparisons: Macroinvertebrate Communities ...........................................A.80 A.4.7.4 Trends in Unionid Mussel Communities ......................A.82 A.4.8 Fish Community ................................................A.84 A.4.8.1 Watershed Assessment ....................................A.84 A.4.8.2 Drainage Area Relationships ...............................A.93 A.5 Findings: Status of Designated Uses......................................A.96 A.5.1 Aquatic Life Uses ...............................................A.96 A.5.1.1 Understanding Use Attainability ...........................A.104 A.5.1.1.1 Background ..................................A.104 A.5.1.1.2 Requirements .................................A.105 A.5.1.2 Results ...............................................A.106 A.5.1.2.1 General Assigned Use Recommendations ..........A.107 A.5.1.2.2 Dual Assigned Use Recommendations .............A.118 A.5.2 Recreation Uses ................................................A.124 A.6 Findings: Discussion by Subwatershed ...................................A.130 A.7 Conclusions .........................................................A.163 A.8 Recommendations....................................................A.167 A.8.1 Protect Ground Water Sources ....................................A.167 A.8.2 Manage Storm Water ............................................A.167 A.8.3 Reduce Nutrient Enrichment ......................................A.168 A.8.4 Improve Habitat Quality .........................................A.169 A.8.5 Develop a Spill Response Plan ....................................A.170 A.8.6 Reduce Bacteria Levels ..........................................A.170 A.8.7 Monitor Watershed Condition .....................................A.171 A.8.7.1 Investigative Monitoring ..................................A.171 A.8.7.2 Periodic Follow-up Monitoring .............................A.172 A.8.7.3 Compliance Monitoring ...................................A.174 A.9 References ..........................................................A.175 A.10 Reader Assistance ...................................................A.181 A.10.1 Acronyms ....................................................A.181 A.10.2 Glossary ......................................................A.183 A.10.3 Mechanisms for Water Quality Impairment ..........................A.194 ii Section B. Detailed Discussion of Findings by Data Type List of Figures in Section B List of Tables in Section B B.1 Point Source Pollutant Loadings.......................................... B.1.1 B.2 Spills and Wild Animal Kills in the Big Darby Creek Watershed: 1979-2002 ...... B.2.1 B.3 Chemical Water Quality ................................................ B.3.1 B.3.1 Chemical, Physical Water Quality Changes: 1979-2001 ............... B.3.83 B.4 Datasonde Results ..................................................... B.4.1 B.5 Sediment Chemistry................................................... B.5.1 B.6 Instream and Riparian Habitat in Support of Aquatic Life ...................... B.6.1 B.7 Macroinvertebrate Community........................................... B.7.1 B.7.1 Watershed Assessment .......................................... B.7.1 B.7.2 Changes in Biological Community Performance: Macroinvertebrate Communities .................................. B.7.59 B.7.3 Drainage Area Comparisons: Macroinvertebrate Communities .......... B.7.67 B.7.4 Trends in Unionid Mussel Communities ............................ B.7.72 B.8 Fish Community...................................................... B.8.1 B.8.1 Watershed Assessment .......................................... B.8.1 B.8.2 Drainage Area Relationships ..................................... B.8.52 B.8.3 Fish Tissue Samples ........................................... B.8.67 Section C. Appendices List of Figures in Section C List of Tables in Section C C.1 Water Chemistry........................................................C.1 C.2 Physical Habitat ........................................................C.2 C.3 Mussel Species Richness Maps ............................................C.3 iii FIGURES IN SECTION A A.1. Map of the Big Darby Creek watershed ...................................A.12 A.2. Glacial geology in west central Ohio ......................................A.14 A.3. Ecoregions of Ohio with subecoregions...................................A.15 A.4. Glacial groundwater yield in the Big Darby watershed ........................A.17 A.5. Generalized soils map .................................................A.18 A.6. Prairies of the “Virginia Military Lands” ..................................A.26 A.7. Map of some fens and forest seeps on a portion of the Little Darby Creek ........A.27 A.8. Map of some fens and forest seeps on a portion of the Little Darby Creek ........A.28 A.9. 1997 land use in Darby Creek watershed ..................................A.31 A.10. Protected land .......................................................A.33 A.11. The four watershed assessment units of the Big Darby Creek watershed .........A.132 iv TABLES IN SECTION A A.1. Sampling locations in the Big Darby Creek watershed, June - October, 2001 .......A.3 A.2. Sampling locations in the Big Darby Creek watershed, June - October, 2002 .......A.7 A.3. Total monthly precipitation for the years 2000 - 2003, Bellefontaine and Marysville stations ................................................A.11 A.4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entomology 101 Jason J
    Entomology 101 Jason J. Dombroskie Manager, Cornell U. Insect Collection Coordinator, Insect Diagnostic Lab This material [email protected] can only be used for CCE MGV audiences. Outline • What is an insect? • Anatomy • Life cycles • Diversity • Major orders • Herbivory Corydalus cornutus Cornell U. Insect Collection • > 7 million specimens • ~200 000 species • worldwide coverage • http://cuic.entomology.cornell.edu/ • on facebook Insect Diagnostic Lab • ~700 IDs per year • 10-20 000 IDs for NYS Dept. Ag. & Markets • occasionally IDs can be made from a photo • mostly local, but some submissions worldwide • $25 fee • http://entomology.cornell.edu/IDL Arthropods Regier, et al. 2005 What is an insect? • 3 main body parts • 6 jointed legs • 1 pair of antennae • compound eyes • usually some sort of metamorphosis Booneacris glacialis Head • antennae • mouthparts • compound eyes • ocelli Monochamus scutellatus Popillia japonica Tetanocera sp. Antheraea polyphemus wikimedia commons labrum maxilla mandible labium Corydalus cornutus Polygonia progne Aedes sp. Hybomitra zonalis Monochamus notatus Aeshna canadensis Isoptera Darapsa myron Thorax • six legs • four wings or less • muscular Amateur Entomologists’ Society Entomologists’ Amateur Limenitis archippus Lethocerus americanus Zeugomantispa minuta Machimus sp. with Herpetogramma pertextalis wikimedia commons Tipula apicalis Cybister fimbriolatus Elasmucha lateralis Automeris io Abdomen • internal organs • genitalia • ovipositor Ophiogomphus rupinsulensis Lauxania shewelli Merope tuber Adoxophyes
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Musculature of the Head of the Corydalus Larva (Neuroptera, Sialidae)
    THE MUSCULATURE 0%’ THE HEAD OF THE CORYDALUS LARVA (NEURqOPTERA, SIALIDAE) 1,2 SOL KBAMER * Departmawt of Zoology, University of Wisconsm, Madison, Wisconsin ‘IWENTY-EIGIXT FIGURES The Neuroptera have long been regarded one of the most primitive groups of the holometabolous insects. Crampton ( ’21) considered the Neuroptera an extremely important group from the standpoint of the siudy of the phylogeny of higher in- sects, and emphasized the primitiveness of such forms as Sialis, Corydalus, and Chauliodea among the Neuroptera (Megaloptera). Although he considered the Coleoptera the more primitive of the two orders from a consideration of the head and mouthparts, he emphasized the astonishing similarity between larval Coleoptera and Neuroptera and concluded that the Coleoptera appear to lead to the Neuroptera which in turn lead to the Mecoptera, Diptera and Siphonaptera on the one hand and to the Trichoptera and Lepidoptera on the other. More recently Chen (’46),in a study on the evolution of insect larvae based on a wide series throughout the Holometabola, selected the nenropteroid genus Corydalus as possessing the most primitive or generalized known type of larva. He desig- nated this primitive type by the term “campodeoid-polypod, ’? characterized by having three pairs of thoracic and 10 pairs of abdominal legs, the latter bearing each a vesicle and a stylus. From this study Chen concluded that all existing types of larvae have been (derivedfrom this primitive type in two ways : Corydalus cornutus L. The writer is grateful for the assistance of R. E. Snodgrass in whose laboratory at the U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects and Their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population
    insects Review Aquatic Insects and their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population D. Dudley Williams 1,* and Siân S. Williams 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C1A4, Canada 2 The Wildlife Trust, The Manor House, Broad Street, Great Cambourne, Cambridge CB23 6DH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Kerry Wilkinson and Heather Bray Received: 28 April 2017; Accepted: 19 July 2017; Published: 21 July 2017 Abstract: Of the 30 extant orders of true insect, 12 are considered to be aquatic, or semiaquatic, in either some or all of their life stages. Out of these, six orders contain species engaged in entomophagy, but very few are being harvested effectively, leading to over-exploitation and local extinction. Examples of existing practices are given, ranging from the extremes of including insects (e.g., dipterans) in the dietary cores of many indigenous peoples to consumption of selected insects, by a wealthy few, as novelty food (e.g., caddisflies). The comparative nutritional worth of aquatic insects to the human diet and to domestic animal feed is examined. Questions are raised as to whether natural populations of aquatic insects can yield sufficient biomass to be of practicable and sustained use, whether some species can be brought into high-yield cultivation, and what are the requirements and limitations involved in achieving this? Keywords: aquatic insects; entomophagy; human diet; animal feed; life histories; environmental requirements 1. Introduction Entomophagy (from the Greek ‘entoma’, meaning ‘insects’ and ‘phagein’, meaning ‘to eat’) is a trait that we Homo sapiens have inherited from our early hominid ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aquatic Neuropterida of Iowa
    Entomology Publications Entomology 7-2020 The Aquatic Neuropterida of Iowa David E. Bowles National Park Service Gregory W. Courtney Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ent_pubs/576. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Entomology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Aquatic Neuropterida of Iowa Abstract The fauna of aquatic Neuropterida of Iowa is documented. We list one species of dobsonfly, three species of fishflies, four alderflies (Megaloptera), and two spongillaflies (Neuroptera). New Iowa distributional records are reported for Protosialis americana (Rambur), Sialis joppa Ross, Sialis mohri Ross, Nigronia serricornis (Say), Climacia areolaris (Hagen), and Sisyra vicaria (Walker). Keywords Sialis, Chauliodes, Corydalus, Nigronia, Climacia, Sisyra Disciplines Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Entomology Comments This article is published as Bowles, David E., and Gregory W. Courtney. "The Aquatic Neuropterida of Iowa." Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 122, no. 3 (2020): 556-565. doi: 10.4289/ 0013-8797.122.3.556. This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs/576 PROC. ENTOMOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaloptera : Corydalidae
    Systematic Entomology (1981) 6, 253--290 Systematics of the dobsonfly subfamily Corydalinae (Megaloptera :Corydalidae) MICHAEL J. GLORIOSO* Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. The genera of Corydalinae are redefined, and representative characters are figured for each genus. New character sources, such as mouthparts and internal female genitalia, are investigated, as well as traditional male genitalia and wings. Allohermes is synonymized with Protohermes, Doeringia with Platy- neuromus. Intergeneric relationships are hypothesized on the basis of a cladistic analysis. Acanthacorydalis and the New World genera form a monophyletic group, as do Protohermes and Neurhermes, and Neuromus and Neoneuromus. Chloroniella belongs in the Acanthacorydalis - New World lineage, but exact placement is uncertain. A phyletic sequence classification is proposed on the basis of the cladistic analysis. Introduction American Covydulus cornutus are excellent angling bait, while dried larvae of Pvotoizevmes The Megaloptera, long considered among the grandis, referred to as 'magotaro mushi', were most primitive of holometabolous insects considered a remedy for infant emotional (Weele, 191 O), contains two families, Sialidae irritation in Japan (Kuwayama, 1962). and Corydalidae. The Corydalidae, easily Relationships within the Corydalinae are separated from the Sialidae by presence of poorly understood, and generic limits are ocelli, non-bilobed fourth tarsomeres, and poorly defined. In this study I redefine the large size, contains two subfamilies, Coryda- genera and postulate intergeneric relation- linae and Chauliodinae. The Corydalinae are ships based on shared derived character states, restricted to North and South America, South or synapotypies. In searching for sufficient Africa and Asia, while the Chauliodinae also characters to more confidently establish occur in Australia and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Toward a Metabolic Theory of Life History 1 2 Joseph Robert Burgera
    1 Toward a metabolic theory of life history 2 3 Joseph Robert Burgera,1*, Chen Houb,1 and James H. Brownc,1 4 a Duke University Population Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705; 5 [email protected] 6 b Department of Biological Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 7 65409; 8 [email protected] 9 c Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; 10 [email protected] 11 1All authors contributed equally 12 *Present address: Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 13 Corresponding authors: JRB [email protected]; JHB [email protected] 14 15 Significance 16 Data and theory reveal how organisms allocate metabolic energy to components of the life 17 history that determine fitness. In each generation animals take up biomass energy from the 18 environment and expended it on survival, growth, and reproduction. Life histories of animals 19 exhibit enormous diversity – from large fish and invertebrates that produce literally millions of 20 tiny eggs and suffer enormous mortality, to mammals and birds that produce a few large 21 offspring with much lower mortality. Yet, underlying this enormous diversity, are general life 22 history rules and tradeoffs due to universal biophysical constraints on the channels of selection. 23 These rules are characterized by general equations that underscore the unity of life. 24 25 Abstract 26 The life histories of animals reflect the allocation of metabolic energy to traits that determine 27 fitness and the pace of living. Here we extend metabolic theories to address how demography 28 and mass-energy balance constrain allocation of biomass to survival, growth, and reproduction 29 over a life cycle of one generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Snorkeling in the City Tection from Abrasive Surfaces
    JAMES RIVER PARK SYSTEM BEFORE YOU BEGIN: Be Safe! • Wear old tennis shoes or spe- cial water shoes to protect your feet from sharp objects—avoid open -toed sandals. • Wear a life jacket. It’ll help protect you from rough rocks, improve your mobility, and keep you afloat if you happen to shoot a small rapid. • Use sunscreen to protect your skin, especially the back of your neck. • A long sleeved shirt and light- weight pants offer extra pro- Snorkeling in the City tection from abrasive surfaces. Underwater exploration on the James River in Richmond • Please…no glass. Do not bring glass into the park. Put all THERE’S SO MUCH TO EXPLORE! THIS SNORKELING GUIDE GIVES trash into a proper receptacle. • Help preserve our city wilder- only a glimpse of the hidden underwater communities of plants and ness…Leave plants, animals, animals living in the James River. Try to explore several spots and and artifacts as your find them compare your findings, or visit the same spot several times through- for others to enjoy. out the summer. Choose a spot and begin your exploration. PORTAGE WILLIAMS ISLAND Areas to Snorkel Areas to AVOID Dams (AVOID) t S RIVERSIDE e r R e MEADOWS d iv i v e r l side e Dr B PONY PASTURE RAPIDS THE WETLANDS P d v u l m B e r v p t e t D A h S S H r s w PUMPHOUSE s o n D A e w a u o i r t x s o a v i e u p e PARK d g r D h T a t d m n r e r n a o LEE BRIDGE M a A L H NORTH BANK PARK L BELLE W allow (Texas Beach) ISLE d a Rd R F as Ave ore y Kans s a t Hil POWHITE PARKWAY BRIDGE l Av w e a h t a H 22nd r D STREET BOULVARD BRIDGE y 2 a 2 w n e R d n iv S i ers r t P ide D Dr Riverside ve d A v l Ri es B ve rsid Dr m s e 3 m l t 0 l e i Rd th S 42ND STREET S rest REEDY H c S l d il t r H n e CREEK 2 v 4 o t s e W Snorkeling in the City JAMES RIVER PARK SYSTEM Creatures that are easy to find Oriental Freshwater Clam American Freshwater Mussel the male flares his fins to show his With shells that are beige, round, These mussels have thin, black shells colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Study List of Common Insects in Texas (March 2010)
    Study List of Common Insects in Texas (March 2010) How to use this list This document presents information about each species that is required for the identification portion of 4-H Entomology. The text in the html version and this PDF version is the same. However, because this version is primarily intended to be printed, the photos are smaller and fewer than those available in the html version. Students will also want to study the html version with its larger photos. The column entitled ʻLevelʼ indicates whether the species is required at the Junior, Intermediate or Senior level. Level Common Name Order Host or Location Significance J Silverfish Thysanura Trunk, closet Pest I Mayflies Ephemeroptera Near water Inconsequential J Black-winged damselfly Odonata Stream Beneficial J Green darner Odonata Stream Beneficial I Stoneflies Plecoptera Near water Inconsequential I Banded-winged grasshopper Orthoptera Pasture Pest J Differential grasshopper Orthoptera Pasture Pest J Long-horned grasshoppers_ Orthoptera Shrubs/grass Pest J Field cricket Orthoptera Buildings Pest I Mole crickets Orthoptera Sandy soil Pest I True katydid Orthoptera Trees Pest J American cockroach Blattodea House Pest I German cockroach Blattodea House Pest I Oriental cockroach Blattodea House Pest J Praying mantids Mantodea Shrubs, vegetation Beneficial J Walkingsticks Phasmatodea Shrubs, vegetation Pest I Earwigs Dermaptera Ground trash Pest I Termites Isoptera Wood, stumps Pest I Barklice Psocoptera Tree trunk Pest I Chicken head louse Phthiraptera (Mallophaga) Poultry Pest J
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aquatic Insects Dobsonflies; Mayflies; Midges; Stoneflies; Caddisflies
    INSECT DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IDL Cornell University, Dept. of Entomology, 2144 Comstock Hall, Ithaca NY 14853-2601 Some Aquatic Insects Dobsonflies; Mayflies; Midges; Stoneflies; Caddisflies Dobsonflies Left: Female Dobsonfly, Right: Head of Male Dobsonfly (note large mandibles) The most spectacular of the aquatic insects is the dobsonfly, Corydalus cornutus. This is the largest species of dobsonfly found in New York, having a wing spread of 4 to 5 inches. It is usually found near water, but at night it may be attracted some distance to bright lights. The wings of both males and females are net-veined, and the mandibles (jaws) of the female are inconspicuous, while those of the male are long and sickle-like. The larvae, often called hellgrammites, are found under stones in swift moving streams, and are used by fishermen for bait. Before you try them for bait remember these insects have strong jaws and can inflict a painful bite. The larvae may live for three years before transforming to adults, and may be as long as 2 or 3 inches when full-grown. Hellgrammites are predaceous insects that feed on small aquatic life. Mayflies Adult Mayfly Mayflies are soft-bodied, slender insects that may be seen flying in great clouds moving across streams and lakes at twilight in an up-and-down-motion mating dance. Fishermen model many "dry flies" after these fragile insects. The adults have two or three long tail filaments and may be seen when attracted to lights in the early evening. Generally the adults hide in trees and shrubs close to aquatic areas until the mating flight.
    [Show full text]
  • And Nigronia Serricornis (Say) (Megaloptera: Corydalidae) in Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 10 Number 2 - Summer 1977 Number 2 - Summer Article 1 1977 June 1977 The Distribution of Corydalus Cornutus (Linnaeus) and Nigronia Serricornis (Say) (Megaloptera: Corydalidae) in Michigan Allen W. Knight University of California Clifford A. Siegfried University of California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Knight, Allen W. and Siegfried, Clifford A. 1977. "The Distribution of Corydalus Cornutus (Linnaeus) and Nigronia Serricornis (Say) (Megaloptera: Corydalidae) in Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 10 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol10/iss2/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Knight and Siegfried: The Distribution of <i>Corydalus Cornutus</i> (Linnaeus) and <i>N THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST THE DISTRIBUTION OF CORYDALUS CORNUTUS (LINNAEUS) AND NlGRONlA SERRICORNIS (SAY) (MEGALOPTERA: CORYDALIDAE) IN MICHIGAN Allen W. Knight and Clifford A. siegfriedl INTRODUCTION The distribution of the hellgrammite [Corydalus cornutus (Linnaeus)] and the sawcombed fishfly [Nigronia serricornis (Say)] in Michigan was determined as part of an investigation of the biology of these large Megalopterans (Knight and Simmons, 1975a, 1975b). Megalopteran larvae are some of the largest aquatic insects, with a maximum length of approximately 84 mm. They are robust larvae with paired lateral abdominal appendages on segments 1-8 and a pair of anal prolegs bearing two strong hooks.
    [Show full text]