DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 148/Friday, July 31, 2020/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 148/Friday, July 31, 2020/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Notices 46183 Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of (II)(aa) imports of articles like or service that was the basis for such July 2020. directly competitive with articles into certification (as defined in subsection Hope D. Kinglock, which one or more component parts 222(c)(3) and (4) of the Act (19 U.S.C. Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment produced by such firm are directly 2272(c)(3) and (4)); AND Assistance. incorporated, have increased; OR (3) either— [FR Doc. 2020–16637 Filed 7–30–20; 8:45 am] (II)(bb) imports of articles like or (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P directly competitive with articles which the component parts it supplied to the are produced directly using the services firm described in paragraph (2) supplied by such firm, have increased; accounted for at least 20 percent of the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OR production or sales of the workers’ firm; (III) imports of articles directly OR Employment and Training incorporating one or more component (B) a loss of business by the workers’ Administration parts produced outside the United firm with the firm described in States that are like or directly paragraph (2) contributed importantly to Notice of Determinations Regarding competitive with imports of articles the workers’ separation or threat of Eligibility To Apply for Trade incorporating one or more component separation determined under paragraph Adjustment Assistance parts produced by such firm have (1). increased; AND In accordance with the Section 223 Section 222(e)—Firms Identified by the (iii) the increase in imports described (19 U.S.C. 2273) of the Trade Act of International Trade Commission 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271, et seq.) (‘‘Act’’), as in clause (ii) contributed importantly to amended, the Department of Labor such workers’ separation or threat of In order for an affirmative herein presents summaries of separation and to the decline in the determination to be made for adversely determinations regarding eligibility to sales or production of such firm; OR affected workers in firms identified by apply for trade adjustment assistance (B) Shift in Production or Services to the International Trade Commission and under Chapter 2 of the Act (‘‘TAA’’) for a Foreign Country Path OR Acquisition a certification issued regarding workers by (TA–W) number issued of Articles or Services from a Foreign eligibility to apply for TAA, the group during the period of June 1, 2020 Country Path: eligibility requirements of Section through June 30, 2020. (This Notice (i) (I) There has been a shift by such 222(e) of the Act (19 U.S.C. primarily follows the language of the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 2272(e))must be met, by following Trade Act. In some places however, production of articles or the supply of criteria (1), (2), and (3) as follows: changes such as the inclusion of services like or directly competitive (1) the workers’ firm is publicly subheadings, a reorganization of with articles which are produced or identified by name by the International language, or ‘‘and,’’ ‘‘or,’’ or other words services which are supplied by such Trade Commission as a member of a are added for clarification.) firm; OR domestic industry in an investigation (II) such workers’ firm has acquired resulting in— Section 222(a)—Workers of a Primary from a foreign country articles or (A) an affirmative determination of Firm services that are like or directly serious injury or threat thereof under In order for an affirmative competitive with articles which are section 202(b)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. determination to be made for workers of produced or services which are 2252(b)(1)); OR a primary firm and a certification issued supplied by such firm; AND (B) an affirmative determination of regarding eligibility to apply for TAA, (ii) the shift described in clause (i)(I) market disruption or threat thereof the group eligibility requirements under or the acquisition of articles or services under section 421(b)(1)of the Act (19 Section 222(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. described in clause (i)(II) contributed U.S.C. 2436(b)(1)); OR 2272(a)) must be met, as follows: importantly to such workers’ separation (C) an affirmative final determination (1) The first criterion (set forth in or threat of separation. of material injury or threat thereof under Section 222(a)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of Section 222(b)—Adversely Affected 2272(a)(1)) is that a significant number the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Secondary Workers or proportion of the workers in such 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); workers’ firm (or ‘‘such firm’’) have In order for an affirmative AND become totally or partially separated, or determination to be made for adversely (2) the petition is filed during the 1- are threatened to become totally or affected secondary workers of a firm and year period beginning on the date on partially separated; AND (2(A) or 2(B) a certification issued regarding which— below) eligibility to apply for TAA, the group (A) a summary of the report submitted (2) The second criterion (set forth in eligibility requirements of Section to the President by the International Section 222(a)(2) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 222(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2272(b)) Trade Commission under section 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied by either (A) must be met, as follows: 202(f)(1) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. the Increased Imports Path, or (B) the (1) a significant number or proportion 2252(f)(1)) with respect to the Shift in Production or Services to a of the workers in the workers’ firm or affirmative determination described in Foreign Country Path/Acquisition of an appropriate subdivision of the firm paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Articles or Services from a Foreign have become totally or partially Federal Register under section 202(f)(3) Country Path, as follows: separated, or are threatened to become (19 U.S.C. 2252(f)(3)); OR (A) Increased Imports Path: totally or partially separated; AND (B) notice of an affirmative (i) the sales or production, or both, of (2) the workers’ firm is a supplier or determination described in such firm, have decreased absolutely; downstream producer to a firm that subparagraph (B) or (C)of paragraph (1) AND (ii and iii below) employed a group of workers who is published in the Federal Register; (ii)(I) imports of articles or services received a certification of eligibility AND like or directly competitive with articles under Section 222(a) of the Act (19 (3) the workers have become totally or produced or services supplied by such U.S.C. 2272(a)), and such supply or partially separated from the workers’ firm have increased; OR production is related to the article or firm within— VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jul 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 46184 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Notices (A) the 1-year period described in Affirmative Determinations for Trade date for all workers of such paragraph (2); OR Adjustment Assistance determination. (B) notwithstanding section 223(b) of The following certifications have been The following certifications have been the Act (19 U.S.C. 2273(b)), the 1-year issued. The date following the company issued. The requirements of Section period preceding the 1-year period name and location of each 222(a)(2)(A) (Increased Imports Path) of described in paragraph (2). determination references the impact the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 95,120 ............... Trelleborg Sealing Solutions El Segundo, Inc., El Segundo, CA .................................................... August 23, 2018. Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc. 95,405 ............... Golden Star, Inc .................................................... Atchison, KS ......................................................... November 22, 2018. 95,447 ............... El Dorado Paper Bag Manufacturing Company, El Dorado, AR ....................................................... December 4, 2018. Inc. 95,499 ............... Castwell Products, LLC ........................................ Skokie, IL .............................................................. December 19, 2018. 95,685 ............... Armstrong Flooring, Inc., Affiliated Temporary South Gate, CA ..................................................... February 12, 2019. Help. 95,805 ............... Russell Stover Chocolates, LLC, Montrose, CO ........................................................ March 10, 2019. Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spru¨ngli, Express Employment Professionals, etc. 95,902 ............... American Crafts, LLC ........................................... Lindon, UT ............................................................ April 27, 2019. 95,902A ............ American Crafts, LLC ........................................... Kansas City, MO ................................................... April 27, 2019. 95,914 ............... The Boeing Company, Boeing Commercial Air- Tukwila, WA .......................................................... May 5, 2019. craft (BCA), Dunhill Staffing Systems Inc., etc. 95,914A ............ Leased workers from American Cybersystems Tukwila, WA .......................................................... February 28, 2020. Inc., etc., Apollo Professional Solutions, Aquent, Artech Information Systems, etc. 95,914B ............ The Boeing Company, Boeing Commercial Air- Portland, OR ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rock Solid Performance WHY Caterpillar?
    2012 YEAR IN REVIEW ROCK SOLID Potential | Position | Plan | People | Performance In a global marketplace filled with shifting dynamics, our customers count on Caterpillar as a dependable source of products, services and solutions to meet their needs. This strategy is the stabilizing force behind our business. Today, we’re as confident of our rock solid strength as at any time in our history. ROCK SOLID 2012 Year in Review Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this 2012 Year in Review relate to future events and expectations and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “will be,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “could,” “should” or other similar words or expressions often identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding our outlook, projections, forecasts or trend descriptions. These statements do not guarantee future performance, and we do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. Caterpillar’s actual results may differ materially from those described or implied in our forward-looking statements based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: (i) global economic conditions and economic conditions in the industries and markets we serve; (ii) government monetary or fiscal policies and infrastructure spending; (iii) commodity or component
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results
    Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results ▪ Continued progress on global safe return to service of 737 MAX ▪ Revenue of $17.0 billion, GAAP earnings per share of $1.00 and core (non-GAAP)* earnings per share of $0.40 ▪ Operating cash flow of ($0.5) billion; cash and marketable securities of $21.3 billion ▪ Commercial Airplanes backlog grew to $285 billion and added 180 net orders Table 1. Summary Financial Results Second Quarter First Half (Dollars in Millions, except per share data) 2021 2020 Change 2021 2020 Change Revenues $16,998 $11,807 44% $32,215 $28,715 12% GAAP Earnings/(Loss) From Operations $1,023 ($2,964) NM $940 ($4,317) NM Operating Margin 6.0 % (25.1) % NM 2.9 % (15.0) % NM Net Earnings/(Loss) $567 ($2,395) NM $6 ($3,036) NM Earnings/(Loss) Per Share $1.00 ($4.20) NM $0.09 ($5.31) NM Operating Cash Flow ($483) ($5,280) NM ($3,870) ($9,582) NM Non-GAAP* Core Operating Earnings/(Loss) $755 ($3,319) NM $402 ($5,019) NM Core Operating Margin 4.4 % (28.1) % NM 1.2 % (17.5) % NM Core Earnings/(Loss) Per Share $0.40 ($4.79) NM ($1.12) ($6.49) NM *Non-GAAP measure; complete definitions of Boeing’s non-GAAP measures are on page 6, “Non-GAAP Measures Disclosures." CHICAGO, July 28, 2021 – The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] reported second-quarter revenue of $17.0 billion, driven by higher commercial airplanes and services volume. GAAP earnings per share of $1.00 and core earnings per share (non-GAAP)* of $0.40 primarily reflects higher commercial volume and lower period costs (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • F. Robert Van Der Linden CV
    Curriculum Vitae F. Robert van der Linden Aeronautics Department National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] 202-633-2647 (Office) Education Ph.D. (Modern American, Business and Military History) The George Washington University. 1997. M.A. (American and Russian History) The George Washington University. 1981. B.A. (History) University of Denver, 1977. Member Phi Beta Kappa Present Position Curator of Air Transportation and Special Purpose Aircraft, Aeronautics Division, National Air and Space Museum (NASM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Primary Responsibilities Research and Writing Currently at work on "The Struggle for the Long-Range Heavy Bomber: The United States Army air Corps, 1934-1939. This book examines the fight between the Army Air Corps, the Army, and the Navy over the introduction of a new generation of long-range heavy bombers during the interwar period. Questions of cost, of departmental responsibility, and of the relationship between business and industry, all play key roles in the search for this elusive aircraft and ultimately which military branch controls the air. Underlying all of these issues is the question of whether or not the United States needs a separate, independent air force. Also researching a book on the creation of Transcontinental & Western Air (TWA). This business history will trace the story of this important airline from its creation in 1930 from the ambitious but unprofitable Transcontinental Air Transport, formed by Clement Keys with technical assistance from Charles Lindbergh, and parts for the successful Western Air Express of Harris Hanshue through World War II and its reorganization as Trans World Airlines under Howard Hughes.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization at Boeing: Past, Present, Future
    Engineering, Operations & Technology Information Technology Visualization:Acquiring Information using Past Visual, Analytics Present, and Future at Boeing Dave Kasik Senior Technical Fellow The Boeing Company Dave Kasik and [email protected] Senesac The Boeing Company June, 2011 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2011 Boeing. All rights reserved. A Bit About Us Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Dave: . Involved in comppgputer graphics since 1969 . Boeing Senior Technical Fellow . ACM Distinguished Scientist . Stand-in on starship bridges . Known around Boeing as – A curmudgeon about virtual reality in the immersive, stereo sense – An a dvoca te for augmen te d rea lity – Leading proponent and expert for broad use of visualization for geometric and non-geometric data . Chr is: . Involved in computer graphics since 1990 . Boeing Senior Architect . Specialty - being able to apply technology to real world problems . Passion is to simplify complex problems Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved. 2 Why Are We Here? Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Boeing builds astounding aerospace products . We require hugely varied technology, ranging from . Basic physics to . Networking (on-board & conventional) to . Computing (real-time systems & traditional) to . Material science to . Natural language analysis to . Basically, you name it, we have it . Boeing generates terror -by tes of data . Has worked with advanced visual analysis techniques to gain more insight from our data Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved. 3 Outline Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Motivation . Past: Give a quick Boeing history of projects that changed computer graphics . Present: Stress current 3D use cases in Boeing . FtFuture: How is compu ter grap hics evol living t o address industrial needs? Copyright © 2012 Boeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years. After They Separated, They Engaged in Four Years of Litigation Over the Distribution of Approximately $200,000 of Property
    I IL_EC COURT OF APPEALq D1V1S10'i4, TI 201 L; MAR 1 1 AN S: 40 S ` E IFF M 1-i3N ON Y ON 1'' Y IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTO DIVISION II In re the Marriage of: No. 43788 -1 - II JEANNE MARIE HARRIS, Appellant, MA ROGER DUANE KELL, UNPUBLISHED OPINION LEE, J. — Jeanne Marie Harris and Roger Duane Kell were married for approximately five years. After they separated, they engaged in four years of litigation over the distribution of approximately $200,000 of property. The trial court primarily awarded the parties their separate property and entered a judgment distributing less than $ 50, 000 in additional assets between the parties. Harris appeals. We affirm the trial court. In addition, due to the intransigent nature of Harris' s appeal, we grant Kell' s request for attorney fees. FACTS Harris and Kell married on May 3, 2003. Kell was an electrician working out of the union hall. He also owned several rental properties. Harris was a Vancouver city councilwoman and she owned a consulting business. After the parties married, they lived together in Harris' s home. No. 43788 -1 - II During the marriage, Kell worked as an electrician for several companies including Kraft and Boeing. Harris ran for county commissioner, but lost. Later she opened an Allstate Insurance agency. Although both parties contributed to household expenses ( Harris paid the mortgage and Kell paid for utilities), they primarily kept their finances separate. During this period, Harris was incurring large amounts of credit card debt. Harris and Kell separated on May 31, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Changes for Open Enrollment in 2021
    Special Section: SPEEA/Boeing open enrollment Nov. 3-24 Prof and Tech contracts Take health assessment by Nov. 24 to avoid monthly fee PEEA members and their covered spouses who do not complete the online health assessment by Nov. 24 will be Sassessed a non-compliance fee of $20 per month per person. This does not apply to dependents. The assessment is available through the Step by Step link on Boeing’s Worklife. Once Few changes for open you’ve located the health assessment link, you will be directed to a Vida portal. enrollment in 2021 Reasons for assessment By Jason Collete $3,600/$7,200. The percentage Boeing Boeing encourages participation for SPEEA Contract Administrator and Benefits contributes to your HSA remains the same. individuals to become more aware of their Coordinator • Anyone may be covered by the health-risk factors. Addressing risk factors Advantage+ plan. But not everyone is early is a way to potentially lower the health- pen enrollment, the time period each eligible to establish and fund a tax-free care costs for the employee and the company. year when employees can change their HSA account. Ensure you understand In addition to raising awareness of potential medical plans, is Nov. 3-24 at The the rules at OBoeing Company. illnesses, the lowered health-care costs www.healthequity.com/boeing. directly affect the company’s bottom line, When reviewing the annual open enrollment • Because the Advantage+ plan uses the because the majority of medical plans are information from Boeing, keep the following exact same network as the Traditional self-funded by Boeing.
    [Show full text]
  • IN 1948 and Part of 1949, World Airways Operated Five Model 314 Flying Boats on Cargo and Charter Flights Along Eastern Seacoast
    a T IN 1948 and part of 1949,World Airways operated five Model 314 flying boats on cargo and charter flights along eastern seacoastand Caribbean routes. In 1950,when the companywas reorganizedunder new management, the flying boats were no longer in its inventory. World Airways President Edward J. Daly said recently, "The B314swere not in operationat the time I becameassociated with World and I am able to provide no cluesas to what becameof them." Sightingsb)' Boeing personnelon businessor pleasuretrips in 1950placed as many as three B3l4s in San Diego, at least one in Baltimore and another in New York. In 1951,Boeing News, the company's employee newspaper, reported that a man calling himself Master X was preparing to dive in Baltimore Harbor in an effort to raise a 8314 sunk in 20 feet of water during a squall. Master X had purchasedthe plane at a sheriff's sale a few days before it sank. His plans were to raise and repair the plane and then fly to Moscow for some personalpeace tall<s with Stalin. There was no follow-up story in the Boeing Neus. As late as two summersago a gambling casinoin Lake Tahoe was reported 3 to be using a 8314 to haul cus- she wrote of flying boats, "people 18603), Atlnntic Ctipper (NC18- I tomers in from San Diego. The will look back upon a Clipper 604), Dixie Clipper (NC18605), story is about as likely as Master flight of today as the most ro- American Clipper (NC18606), Ber- X's mission to Moscow. mantic voyage of history." ajc& (NC18607 and G-AGCA), Then what did happen to these Boeing built 12 of the big planes Bangor (NC18608 and G-AGCB), airplanes and why should anybody for Pan American Airways.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Airplanes: Backgrounder
    Backgrounder Boeing Commercial Airplanes P.O. Box 3707 MC 21-70 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 www.boeing.com The Boeing Next-Generation 737 Family – Productive, Progressive, Flexible, Familiar The members of the Next-Generation 737 family -- the 737-600/-700/-800/- 900ER models -- continue the 737’s popularity and reliability in commercial jetliner transport. The Next-Generation family has won orders for more than 6,500 airplanes, while the combined 737 family has surpassed 11,200 orders. Boeing has delivered more than 7,700 737s (of those more than 4,600 are Next-Generation 737s) through September 2013. The 737 program broke the record for orders for any Boeing model in a single year, accumulating 1,124 net orders in 2012. The 737 MAX – which brings the best of future engine technologies to the record-selling 737 – accounted for 914 of those orders in 2012. In addition, the Next-Generation 737 set a new single-year record with 415 deliveries to customers worldwide. The 737 program also celebrated its 10,000th order in 2012. Two airplane models delivered in 2007 Two Next-Generation 737s were certified and entered service in 2007. The 737-900ER (Extended Range) was launched July 18, 2005, with an order for 30 airplanes from Indonesian carrier Lion Air. The airplane was certified by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on April 20, 2007, and validated by the Indonesian regulatory agency April 26. Lion Air received its first 737-900ER on April 27, 2007. Certification by the European Aviation Safety Agency followed on April 22, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Drag Prediction of the DPW4 Configuration Using the Far-Field Approach David Hue, Sébastien Esquieu
    Computational Drag Prediction of the DPW4 configuration using the Far-Field Approach David Hue, Sébastien Esquieu To cite this version: David Hue, Sébastien Esquieu. Computational Drag Prediction of the DPW4 configuration using the Far-Field Approach. AIAA Journal, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 48 (5), pp.1658-1670. hal-01894113 HAL Id: hal-01894113 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01894113 Submitted on 23 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Computational Drag Prediction of the DPW4 configuration using the Far-Field Approach David HUE 1and Sébastien ESQUIEU 2 ONERA, Meudon, 92190, France This paper presents the computational studies done at ONERA in the context of the 4 th AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop. Furthermore, it gives a detailed description of the far-field methods developed in the Applied Aerodynamics Department. Concerning the DPW4 configuration, a grid convergence study and a downwash study are proposed. Then, the effects due to Mach and Reynolds numbers variations are quantified. All the multiblock structured grids used in this work have been provided by Boeing to the DPW community. All the RANS computations are performed by using the ONERA-elsA solver with the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, the solutions are post-processed with the ONERA-ffd72 far-field drag extraction tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the FAA's Review of the Boeing 737
    Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Return to Service of the Boeing 737 MAX Aircraft Date: November 18, 2020 Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX This page intentionally left blank. 1 Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 5 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 Post-Accident Actions ....................................................................................... 6 Summary of Changes to Aircraft Design and Operation ........................................ 9 Additional Changes Related to the Flight Control Software Update. ...................... 10 Training Enhancements .................................................................................. 11 Compliance Activity ....................................................................................... 12 System Safety Analysis .................................................................................. 13 Return to Service .......................................................................................... 13 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 14 1. Purpose of Final Summary ........................................................................... 15 2. Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing AMSS System License Compliance Report -- Reflector Antenna AES Update
    Boeing AMSS System License Compliance Report -- Reflector Antenna AES Update This Update to Boeing’s prior License Compliance Report1 is submitted pursuant to Special Condition 5948 of earth station authorization Call Sign E000723, and verifies that operation of Boeing’s reflector antenna aircraft earth station (AES) with its licensed Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite Service (AMSS) system complies with the conditions of Boeing’s AMSS licensing order and the specific design guidelines set forth in ordering clause ¶19(h)(1)-(5).2 These design guidelines derive from work conducted in ITU-R working party 4A that was later incorporated into ITU-R Recommendation M.1643, and are designed to protect Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) operations from harmful interference from AES transmissions in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band. Section 1 of this Update covers control and monitoring functions (¶19(h)(3)-(4)). Section 2 covers the control of aggregate off-axis EIRP (¶19(h)(1)). Section 3 covers factors that affect off-axis EIRP (¶19(h)(5.1)-(5.3)) including mis-pointing of AES antennas in Section 3.1, variations in AES antenna pattern in Section 3.2, and variations in AES transmit EIRP in Section 3.3. Resistance to being “pulled off” to adjacent satellites (¶19(h)(2)) is also covered in Section 3.1. The data presented in this Update shows that operation of Boeing’s reflector antenna AES complies with significant margin to all conditions of the licensing order. 1 Control and Monitoring Functions The addition of the reflector antenna to Boeing’s AMSS system does not affect the control and monitoring functions that are included in the Boeing system to ensure that AES transmissions always remain under positive control, and to identify and shut down any malfunctioning AES, as described in Boeing’s AMSS license application3 and License Compliance Report.4 The Boeing system will continue to be controlled by a network control and monitoring facility (NCMC) (¶19(h)(3)), which is referred to in this Update as the network operations center (NOC).
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Frontiers Takes a Look at Some of the People from Across the Enterprise Who Also Say They Have the Best Job in the Company
    December 2006/January 2007 Volume V, Issue VIII www.boeing.com/frontiers GREAT JOB! Mike Duffy, an aerodynamics engineer in Philadelphia, says he has the best job at Boeing. Look inside to read more about him—and TECH’S ‘CHALLENGE’ others who say they have Warming to an important Boeing’s best job. program, amid Alaska’s chill. Center pullout, after Page 34 HOW YOU CAN HELP Jim McNerney: 5 things you can do to make Boeing better. Page 6 It takes an excellent company to do one thing well. It takes an extraordinary company to do many things well. Which is precisely why Boeing values its partnership with Cobham. A partnership that produces state-of-the-art results on projects ranging from Unmanned Air Vehicles to Future Combat Systems. One of the many things Cobham does well, is being a good partner. ` 1" = 1" = 1" Scale: 114803_a01 B & C F 11/17/06 PH This is the seventh in a series of new ads created to build awareness of Boeing and its many valuable partnerships in the United Kingdom. Boeing, the largest overseas customer of the UK aerospace industry, currently partners with more than 300 businesses and universities around the country. The advertising campaign has appeared in The Sunday Tımes, The Economist, New Statesman and other UK publications, and complements current Boeing business and communications activities in that nation. JOB NUMBER: BOEG-0000-M2457 Version: C FRONTIERS CLIENT: Boeing PRODUCT: Corporate Communications DIVISION: None Date: 11/17/06 4:39 PM Colors: Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, PDM: Scott Simpson File Name: m2457vC_r0_Cbhm_Frnt.indd Black Editor: Pat Owens Media: ADV Mag Fonts: Helvetica (Light Oblique, Light; Type 1), QC: Yanez Color Sp: 4C FRONTIERS Agenda (Light; Type 1) Images: m2457CT01_PgCbhm_HR_r2.eps (339 ppi), Print Producer: Kim Nosalik Scale: 1=1 Boeing-FNF_rev_ad-StPg.eps Traffi c Supervisor: Kelly Riordan Bleed: 8.875 in x 11.25 in Headline: Boeing and the curious..
    [Show full text]