DOCSLIB.ORG

Hitler and Appeasement : the British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HITLER AND APPEASEMENT : THE BRITISH ATTEMPT TO PREVENT THE SECOND WORLD WAR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Peter Neville | 256 pages | 30 Jul 2007 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781852855277 | English | London, United Kingdom Hitler and Appeasement : The British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War PDF Book Westminster was gripped by intrigue, and there seemed a real possibility that the prime minister could fall. First, cast a dark shadow on the opinion leaders of the s, who determined this time to shun arms races and balance-of-power and commercial competition, and so to spare the world another horrible war. Thus, when the policy of appeasement was chosen by Neville Chamberlain, most people agreed that it was a move in the right direction, and that it was in the best interests of all the countries involved. Appeasement was popular for several reasons. More often than we might imagine, these two are intertwined. It highlights that, even in moments of great danger, politicians will naturally look out for themselves. The following year, Chamberlain supported the Holiday with Pay Act, which gave workers a week off with pay. Peter Neville. By then, however, the fulcrum of diplomacy had long since shifted to central Europe. He knew his future was at stake. The prime minister believed he had pulled off a diplomatic coup that would prevent a devastating European war. After the appalling experiences of the First World War, no one in Britain wished to be in another war. Great Britain. Under the agreement, the German-speaking areas of the Sudetenland were to be incorporated into the Reich and an international commission would oversee plebiscites elsewhere along the border. While he saw Britain through the early days of the war, Chamberlain found himself on the political decline. The diplomatic ground that the prime minister ceded during his visits to Germany appalled many of his colleagues back home. People demonstrating against British concessions to Hitler, Whitehall, 22 September The Munich agreement is entrenched in popular memory as a diplomatic disaster and a source of enduring lessons for the future. A protest march on 22 September drew thousands of people onto the streets of Westminster. Read more on the Second World War here. Hitler, Mussolini and Japan posed a terrible threat to Britain and its empire. Chamberlain signed the Munich Pact in , which gave parts of Czechoslovakia to Germany. Yet it was one of the most consequential of the century. Hitler and Appeasement : The British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War Writer Share this Share on twitter Share on facebook. Queen Victoria: how and why did she become Empress of India? September saw the 80th anniversary of the infamous Munich agreement. Cynics thought this rather opportunistic. His stance was probably rooted more in politics — anxiety about how the government was perceived at home — than strategic disagreement with Chamberlain. On 30 September the British prime minister Neville Chamberlain climbed out of an aeroplane at Heston aerodrome in London. The civil war in Spain The Spanish Civil War highlighted the contrast between democratic bankruptcy and totalitarian dynamism. Voices of dissent existed. As if that was not bad enough, Chamberlain himself came across as pompous and sarcastic. Peter Neville. The prime minister believed he had pulled off a diplomatic coup that would prevent a devastating European war. Chamberlain found success in business after returning to England. Inhalt Hitler Comes to Power. Hitler, Mussolini and Japan posed a terrible threat to Britain and its empire. Shop for Books on Google Play Browse the world's largest eBookstore and start reading today on the web, tablet, phone, or ereader. After Hitler's forces entered Poland that September, Chamberlain officially declared war on Germany; this declaration came shortly after the invasion, but his slight delay in making this announcement negatively impacted Chamberlain's popularity. Yet, by September , Halifax was a worried man. Hitler, Mussolini and Japan posed a terrible threat to Britain and its empire. Appeasement was popular for several reasons. British appeasement and American isolationism The rationale of appeasement It is time to explore the roots of democratic lethargy in the face of Fascist expansionism in the s. At first sight this seems strange. The stage was set for a showdown between the prime minister and the foreign secretary. The first female prime minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher was a controversial figurehead of conservative ideology during her time in office. Second World War. The government lost several parliamentary seats at byelections earlier in the year, while the opposition Labour party and growing numbers of newspapers were quick to draw attention to its difficulties abroad. The ineffectual Blum at first fraternally promised aid to the Popular Front in Madrid, but he reneged within a month for fear that such involvement might provoke a European war or a civil war in France. A protest march on 22 September drew thousands of people onto the streets of Westminster. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Three Crises. On the afternoon of 28 September, Chamberlain went to the House of Commons to explain his policy. Hitler and Appeasement Peter Neville No preview available - At the time, all the concessions made towards Adolf Hitler and his government, such as the annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia were believed to be positive moves by the British politicians and the general public. Hitler threatened to simply march his forces across the frontier and seize the disputed territory, the Sudetenland. But the Republicans, or loyalists, a Popular Front composed of liberals, Socialists, Trotskyites, Stalinists, and anarchists, took up arms to defend the Republic elsewhere and sought outside aid against what they styled as the latest Fascist threat. Get print book. Residents of a Sudetenland town greet German troops in October So many MPs passed him notes urging him to attack the government that he had to tie them all together with an elastic band. Load Previous Page. Hitler and Appeasement : The British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War Reviews Under the agreement, the German-speaking areas of the Sudetenland were to be incorporated into the Reich and an international commission would oversee plebiscites elsewhere along the border. Joseph Goebbels served as minister of propaganda for the German Third Reich under Adolf Hitler — a position from which he spread the Nazi message. Italy and Japan. A brief guide to the history of the NHS. At the heart of the crisis was the foreign secretary, Lord Halifax. The prime minister returned home a national hero. Halifax argued that if the Czechs chose to resist Germany, Britain and France should fight with them. Peter Neville. Residents of a Sudetenland town greet German troops in October The agreement unravelled and Hitler seized the rest of Czechoslovakia in March , a crucial stage on the road to the Second World War. Thus, Wilsonian national self-determination perversely made the Nazis appear to be on the side of principle. Hitler threatened to simply march his forces across the frontier and seize the disputed territory, the Sudetenland. A brief guide to the history of the NHS. At the Munich Conference that September, Neville Chamberlain seemed to have averted war by agreeing that Germany could occupy the Sudetenland, the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia - this became known as the Munich Agreement. Second, the overextended British Empire lacked the resources to confront threats from Japan in Asia, Italy in the Mediterranean, and Germany in Europe all at once. Problems arose when Chamberlain returned to Germany on 22 September. The NHS: a brief history. On 30 September the British prime minister Neville Chamberlain climbed out of an aeroplane at Heston aerodrome in London. The prime minister believed he had pulled off a diplomatic coup that would prevent a devastating European war. Chamberlain had three sisters, Ethel, Ida and Hilda, as well as two older half-siblings, Beatrice and Austen, from his father's first marriage. Joshua Chamberlain fought heroically at the Battle of Gettysburg in the American Civil War, served four terms as governor of Maine and was appointed president of Bowdoin College. Chamberlain had escaped the trap his political rivals had set for him. Churchill was planning to strike openly at him, and others would likely do the same. It highlights that, even in moments of great danger, politicians will naturally look out for themselves. After the appalling experiences of the First World War, no one in Britain wished to be in another war. He believed that there loomed a confrontation in eastern Europe between Germany and the Soviet Union that Britain should steer clear of. The false hope of peace changed into an acceptance, that a second World War was now inevitable. Article Contents. Italy and Japan. You may like. The prime minister hoped this would mark the dawn of a new era of European stability. The relief was palpable. Hitler and Appeasement : The British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War Read Online The outbreak of a major conflict seemed likely — and over a border that few in Britain actually considered a vital national interest. Still, he was determined that he alone would make British policy. True to form, many of them interpreted the Munich agreement in terms of what it meant for their own prospects. Some have speculated that his desire to keep the peace was somewhat driven by Britain being outmatched by Germany's military at the time. In March , he violated the Munich Agreement by occupying the rest of Czechoslovakia. With America withdrawn into isolationism and Stalin's Russia hostile to the West, it is hardly surprising that Britain strove to sustain peace for as long as possible by the traditional tools of diplomacy and accommodation.
Recommended publications
  • Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with Specific Reference to the Activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts

    Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with Specific Reference to the Activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts

    Mother Russia and the Socialist Fatherland: Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with specific reference to the activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts by Nancy Butler A thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada November 2010 Copyright © Nancy Butler, 2010 ii Abstract This dissertation traces a shift in the Communist Party of Canada, from the 1929 to 1935 period of militant class struggle (generally known as the ‘Third Period’) to the 1935-1939 Popular Front Against Fascism, a period in which Communists argued for unity and cooperation with social democrats. The CPC’s appropriation and redeployment of bourgeois gender norms facilitated this shift by bolstering the CPC’s claims to political authority and legitimacy. ‘Woman’ and the gendered interests associated with women—such as peace and prices—became important in the CPC’s war against capitalism. What women represented symbolically, more than who and what women were themselves, became a key element of CPC politics in the Depression decade. Through a close examination of the cultural work of two prominent middle-class female members, Dorothy Livesay, poet, journalist and sometime organizer, and Eugenia (‘Jean’ or ‘Jim’) Watts, reporter, founder of the Theatre of Action, and patron of the Popular Front magazine New Frontier, this thesis utilizes the insights of queer theory, notably those of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler, not only to reconstruct both the background and consequences of the CPC’s construction of ‘woman’ in the 1930s, but also to explore the significance of the CPC’s strategic deployment of heteronormative ideas and ideals for these two prominent members of the Party.
  • The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution

    The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution

    Internationalist Group League for th,e Fourth International The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution Volunteers from the anarcho-syndicalist CNT and POUM militias head to the front against Franco's forces in Spanish Civil War, Barcelona, September 1936. The bourgeois Popular Front government defended capitalist property, dissolved workers' militias and blocked the road to revolution. Internationalist Group Class Readings May 2007 $2 ® <f$l~ 1162-M Introduction The question of the popular front is one of the defining issues in our epoch that sharply counterpose the revolution­ ary Marxism of Leon Trotsky to the opportunist maneuverings of the Stalinists and social democrats. Consequently, study of the popular front is indispensable for all those who seek to play a role in sweeping away capitalism - a system that has brought with it untold poverty, racial, ethnic, national and sexual oppression and endless war - and opening the road to a socialist future. "In sum, the People's Front is a bloc of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat," Trotsky wrote in December 1937 in re­ sponse to questions from the French magazine Marianne. Trotsky noted: "When two forces tend in opposite directions, the diagonal of the parallelogram approaches zero. This is exactly the graphic formula of a People's Front govern­ ment." As a bloc, a political coalition, the popular (or people's) front is not merely a matter of policy, but of organization. Opportunists regularly pursue class-collaborationist policies, tailing after one or another bourgeois or petty-bourgeois force. But it is in moments of crisis or acute struggle that they find it necessary to organizationally chain the working class and other oppressed groups to the class enemy (or a sector of it).
  • Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manches

    Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manches

    Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 David W. Mottram School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of contents Abstract p.4 Declaration p.5 Copyright statement p.5 Acknowledgements p.6 Introduction p.7 Terminology, sources and methods p.10 Structure of the thesis p.14 Chapter One The Lost War p.16 1.1 The place of ‘Spain’ in British politics p.17 1.2 Viewing ‘Spain’ through external perspectives p.21 1.3 The dispersal, 1939 p.26 Conclusion p.31 Chapter Two Adjustments to the Lost War p.33 2.1 The Communist Party and the International Brigaders: debt of honour p.34 2.2 Labour’s response: ‘The Spanish agitation had become history’ p.43 2.3 Decline in public and political discourse p.48 2.4 The political parties: three Spanish threads p.53 2.5 The personal price of the lost war p.59 Conclusion p.67 2 Chapter Three The lessons of ‘Spain’: Tom Wintringham, guerrilla fighting, and the British war effort p.69 3.1 Wintringham’s opportunity, 1937-1940 p.71 3.2 ‘The British Left’s best-known military expert’ p.75 3.3 Platform for influence p.79 3.4 Defending Britain, 1940-41 p.82 3.5 India, 1942 p.94 3.6 European liberation, 1941-1944 p.98 Conclusion p.104 Chapter Four The political and humanitarian response of Clement Attlee p.105 4.1 Attlee and policy on Spain p.107 4.2 Attlee and the Spanish Republican diaspora p.113 4.3 The signal was Greece p.119 Conclusion p.125 Conclusion p.127 Bibliography p.133 49,910 words 3 Abstract Complexities and divisions over British left-wing responses to the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939 have been well-documented and much studied.
  • The 2009 Kemper Lecturer Is Announced! Details Inside

    The 2009 Kemper Lecturer Is Announced! Details Inside

    THE WINSTON CHURCHILL MEMORIAL & LIBRARY IN THE UNITED STATES PLUS: THE 2009 KEMPER LECTURER IS ANNOUNCED! DETAILS INSIDE... WESTMINSTER COLLEGE | FULTON, MISSOURI | WINTER 2008 MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Board of Governors Association of Churchill Fellows William H. Tyler Chairman & Senior Fellow Carmel, California elcome to the winter edition of the Memo and a packed Earl Harbison St. Louis, Missouri edition it is too. We have two very interesting articles the first is from Dr. Richard Toye, who writes about Whitney R. Harris St. Louis, Missouri the relationship between Sir Winston and his great friend and rival, W William Ives David Lloyd George. This article is a distillation of Dr. Toye’s recent Chapel Hill, North Carolina book, entitled appropriately enough Churchill and Lloyd George, Rivals R. Crosby Kemper, III for Greatness. I hope the article whets your appetite sufficiently that Kansas City, Missouri you purchase the book- it is highly recommended! Additionally, as we Barbara Lewington look ahead to the 40th anniversary of the dedication of St. Mary, the St. Louis, Missouri Virgin, Aldermanbury, we have a fascinating piece by Carolyn Perry, Richard J. Mahoney Professor of English at Westminster College. Dr. Perry links a number St. Louis, Missouri of themes in her article; that of the Churches in the City of London, John R. McFarland the great poem by TS Eliot ‘The Wasteland’ (which features many St. Louis, Missouri references to City Churches) and of course the significant local relevance Jean Paul Montupet of Eliot himself, a Missouri native and confirmed Anglophile. St. Louis, Missouri William R. Piper St.
  • British War Cabinet

    British War Cabinet

    British War Cabinet Dear Delegates to the British War Cabinet, Welcome to the British War Cabinet (BWC) and University of Michigan Model United Nations Conference (UMMUN). I would like to extend a special welcome to those of you new to UMMUN. This committee will hopefully prove to be very exciting because of the dynamics and, of course, you, the delegates. This year, we have decided to create a new committee to fit the growing needs of delegates. You will be asked to tackle difficult situations quickly and keep your wits about you. Also, with no set topic, I expect each delegate to be well-versed in the person he or she represents as well as his or her powers and areas expertise. I do not expect you to become experts, but I do expect you to know what information you should know so that it may be called upon, if needed. This is a small committee, and as such, I will expect you all to be very active during the conference. I have a great staff this year. Dana Chidiac is my Assitant Director. She is a second year student concentrating in English. My name is Nicole Mazur. I am a fourth year student at UM, double concentrating in Political Science and Communications. My model UN career began when I got to college and have since been to conferences at University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, University of Chicago, McGill University, and Georgetown University. Last year for UMMUN, I was the Director of the United States National Security Council. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
  • The Political Thought of Aneurin Bevan Nye Davies Thesis

    The Political Thought of Aneurin Bevan Nye Davies Thesis

    The Political Thought of Aneurin Bevan Nye Davies Thesis submitted to Cardiff University in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Law and Politics September 2019 DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of …………………………(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… WORD COUNT 77,992 (Excluding summary, acknowledgements, declarations, contents pages, appendices, tables, diagrams and figures, references, bibliography, footnotes and endnotes) Summary Today Aneurin Bevan is a revered figure in British politics, celebrated for his role as founder one of the country’s most cherished institutions, the National Health Service.
  • Anti-Fascism and Democracy in the 1930S

    Anti-Fascism and Democracy in the 1930S

    02_EHQ 32/1 articles 20/11/01 10:48 am Page 39 Tom Buchanan Anti-fascism and Democracy in the 1930s In November 1936 Konni Zilliacus wrote to John Strachey, a leading British left-wing intellectual and a prime mover in the recently founded Left Book Club, inviting him to ponder ‘the problem of class-war strategy and tactics in a democracy’. Zilliacus, a press officer with the League of Nations and subse- quently a Labour Party MP, was particularly worried about the failure of the Communist Party and the Comintern to offer a clear justification for their decision to support the Popular Front and collective security. ‘There is no doubt’, Zilliacus wrote, ‘that those who are on the side of unity are woefully short of a convincing come-back when the Right-Wing put up the story about Com- munist support of democracy etc. being merely tactical camou- flage.’1 Zilliacus’s comment raises very clearly the issue that lies at the heart of this article. For it is well known that the rise of fascism in the 1930s appeared to produce a striking affirmation of sup- port for democracy, most notably in the 1936 election victories of the Spanish and French Popular Fronts. Here, and elsewhere, anti-fascism was able to unite broad political coalitions rang- ing from liberals and conservatives to socialists, communists and anarchists. But were these coalitions united more by a fear of fascism than by a love of democracy — were they, in effect, marriages of convenience? Historians have long disagreed on this issue. Some have emphasized the prior loyalty of Communist supporters of the Popular Front to the Stalinist regime in the USSR, and have explained their new-found faith in democracy as, indeed, a mere ‘tactical camouflage’ (a view given retrospec- tive weight by the 1939 Nazi–Soviet Pact).
  • Anti-Fascism in a Global Perspective

    Anti-Fascism in a Global Perspective

    ANTI-FASCISM IN A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Transnational Networks, Exile Communities, and Radical Internationalism Edited by Kasper Braskén, Nigel Copsey and David Featherstone First published 2021 ISBN: 978-1-138-35218-6 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-35219-3 (pbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-05835-6 (ebk) Chapter 10 ‘Aid the victims of German fascism!’: Transatlantic networks and the rise of anti-Nazism in the USA, 1933–1935 Kasper Braskén (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) This OA chapter is funded by the Academy of Finland (project number 309624) 10 ‘AID THE VICTIMS OF GERMAN FASCISM!’ Transatlantic networks and the rise of anti-Nazism in the USA, 1933–1935 Kasper Braskén Anti-fascism became one of the main causes of the American left-liberal milieu during the mid-1930s.1 However, when looking back at the early 1930s, it seems unclear as to how this general awareness initially came about, and what kind of transatlantic exchanges of information and experiences formed the basis of a rising anti-fascist consensus in the US. Research has tended to focus on the latter half of the 1930s, which is mainly concerned with the Communist International’s (Comintern) so-called popular front period. Major themes have included anti- fascist responses to the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, the strongly felt soli- darity with the Spanish Republic during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), or the slow turn from an ‘anti-interventionist’ to an ‘interventionist/internationalist’ position during the Second World War.2 The aim of this chapter is to investigate two communist-led, international organisations that enabled the creation of new transatlantic, anti-fascist solidarity networks only months after Hitler’s rise to power in January 1933.
  • Narratives of Delusion in the Political Practice of the Labour Left 1931–1945

    Narratives of Delusion in the Political Practice of the Labour Left 1931–1945

    Narratives of Delusion in the Political Practice of the Labour Left 1931–1945 Narratives of Delusion in the Political Practice of the Labour Left 1931–1945 By Roger Spalding Narratives of Delusion in the Political Practice of the Labour Left 1931–1945 By Roger Spalding This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Roger Spalding All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0552-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0552-0 For Susan and Max CONTENTS Preface ...................................................................................................... viii Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One ............................................................................................... 14 The Bankers’ Ramp Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 40 Fascism, War, Unity! Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 63 From the Workers to “the People”: The Left and the Popular Front Chapter
  • 'The Trojan Horse': Communist Entrism in the British Labour Party

    'The Trojan Horse': Communist Entrism in the British Labour Party

    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Campbell, Alan and McIlroy, John (2018) ’The Trojan Horse’: Communist entrism in the British Labour party, 1933-43. Labor History, 59 (5) . pp. 513-554. ISSN 0023-656X [Article] (doi:10.1080/0023656X.2018.1436938) Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23927/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
  • Milovan Djilas and the British Labour Party, 1950–19601

    Milovan Djilas and the British Labour Party, 1950–19601

    58 Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino LVIII – 3/2018 1.01 UDC :929DJILAS M.:329(410)LAB»1950/1960« Mateja Režek* Milovan Djilas and the British Labour Party, 1950–19601 IZVLEČEK MILOVAN ĐILAS IN BRITANSKA LABURISTIČNA STRANKA, 1950–1960 Članek obravnava politično preobrazbo Milovana Đilasa skozi analizo njegovih stikov z britanskimi laburisti in odziv Laburistične stranke na afero Đilas. Po sporu z Informbirojem so jugoslovanski voditelji skušali vzpostaviti alternativne mednarodne povezave tudi prek zahodnih socialdemokratskih in socialističnih strank, kot najprimer- nejši partner pa se je pokazala britanska Laburistična stranka. Uradni stiki z njo so bili vzpostavljeni leta 1950, ključno vlogo v dialogu z britanskimi laburisti pa je odigral pred- sednik Komisije za mednarodne odnose CK ZKJ Milovan Đilas. Po njegovi odstranitvi iz političnega življenja in obsodbi na zaporno kazen so se nekoč topli odnosi med britanskimi laburisti in jugoslovanskimi komunisti sicer ohladili, vendar vodstvo Laburistične stranke ni želelo tvegati poslabšanja odnosov z Jugoslavijo, zato se je na afero Đilas odzivalo zelo previdno. Čeprav je Jugoslavija ostajala avtoritarna država pod vodstvom komunistične partije, je v očeh Zahoda še vedno predstavljala pomemben dejavnik destabilizacije vzho- dnega bloka, prijateljski odnosi med Laburistično stranko in jugoslovanskimi komunisti pa so temeljili predvsem na zunanjepolitičnih interesih obeh strani. V drugi polovici petdesetih let je pragmatični geopolitični premislek povsem prevladal nad ideološko afiniteto: zani-
  • Winston Churchill's Evolvin

    Winston Churchill's Evolvin

    Winston Churchill's Evolving Views of Russia, 1917-1953, Reconsidered http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/transcripts/0144.html/:pf_print... Winston Churchill's Evolving Views of Russia, 1917-1953, Reconsidered Historical Retrospectives Symposium John Lukacs , Nicholas X. Rizopoulos April 1, 2009 Introduction Remarks Discussion Introduction NICHOLAS RIZOPOULOS: I'm Nick Rizopoulos. Welcome to the first of these experimental symposia that we are trying out for the first time at the Carnegie Council. I think—in fact, I'm positive—that they are going to be very successful. How can they not be, since we start with John Lukacs as our guest? Winston Churchill, by Yousuf Karsh, 1941. The idea is to try something different. As some of you know, for the last dozen years or so, I have been running something called the Foreign Policy Roundtable here for a very small group of people, in a seminar format, mostly journalists and editors. Now the time has come to do something else that I have always loved doing, which is this historical retrospective, which at different times in my career I have tried out, in the old Lehrman Institute 20 years ago and then later at the Council on Foreign Relations . I thought, with Joel Rosenthal 's encouragement, that we should see if it might work even better in this particularly cozy setting of the Carnegie Council, and thanks to a nice little grant from the Carnegie Corporation , through the good offices of my dear friend Steve Del Rosso , we are able to do these two symposia, one today, one in May, as you know.