British War Cabinet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British War Cabinet British War Cabinet Dear Delegates to the British War Cabinet, Welcome to the British War Cabinet (BWC) and University of Michigan Model United Nations Conference (UMMUN). I would like to extend a special welcome to those of you new to UMMUN. This committee will hopefully prove to be very exciting because of the dynamics and, of course, you, the delegates. This year, we have decided to create a new committee to fit the growing needs of delegates. You will be asked to tackle difficult situations quickly and keep your wits about you. Also, with no set topic, I expect each delegate to be well-versed in the person he or she represents as well as his or her powers and areas expertise. I do not expect you to become experts, but I do expect you to know what information you should know so that it may be called upon, if needed. This is a small committee, and as such, I will expect you all to be very active during the conference. I have a great staff this year. Dana Chidiac is my Assitant Director. She is a second year student concentrating in English. My name is Nicole Mazur. I am a fourth year student at UM, double concentrating in Political Science and Communications. My model UN career began when I got to college and have since been to conferences at University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, University of Chicago, McGill University, and Georgetown University. Last year for UMMUN, I was the Director of the United States National Security Council. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me. I will get back to you as soon as possible. I look forward to meeting you all in January. Best wishes, Nicole Mazur [email protected] British War Cabinet 2 DAIS STAFF Director - Nicole Mazur Assistant Director - Dana Chidiac COMMITTEE MISSION The Cabinet is set to begin in the summer of 1940, prior to the entrance of the Soviets in cooperation with the Great Britain and the entrance of the United States. Therefore, one of the goals of the delegates will be to discern ways of getting these nations as well as others into the war. The students should be well versed in the chronology and events of World War II up to the start date of the Cabinet. After that, the students should remember that events may not follow the exact chronology of the war as we know. This is a chance to change history. TOPIC OVERVIEW The British War Cabinet, the center of the government, was announced on May 11, 1940. At that time it only consisted of five men: Winston Churchill, Neville Chamberlain, Clement Attlee, Lord Halifax, and Arthur Greenwood. The membership of the War Cabinet revealed that the principle of choice had been primarily politics. To call it a strong Cabinet would be difficult, but to say it was merely the rubber stamp of Churchill himself is not fair. Certainly in the early days Churchill powered and even sustained his colleagues. It appears that even the topic of negotiations with Hitler was raised briefly by Halifax eon May 27, 1940. Churchill believed that members of the War Cabinet should combine overseeing the whole war effort with responsibility for certain executive departments. In a political sense he hoped that this would keep his most able colleagues fully occupied, but sound administrative reasons also existed. British War Cabinet 3 British War Cabinet 4 HISTORY OF THE BRITISH WAR CABINET The British War Cabinet, the center of the British government during WWII, was announced on May 11, 1940. At that time it only consisted of five men: Winston Churchill, Neville Chamberlain, Clement Attlee, Lord Halifax, and Arthur Greenwood. The membership of the War Cabinet revealed that the principle of choice in selecting the cabinet had been primarily politics. To call it a “strong” Cabinet would be difficult, but to say it was merely Churchill’s rubber stamp is not fair. In its early days, Churchill powered and even sustained his colleagues. It appears that the topic of negotiations with Hitler was raised briefly by Halifax on May 27, 1940. Churchill believed that members of the War Cabinet should combine overseeing the whole war effort with responsibility for certain executive departments. In a political sense, he hoped that this would keep his most able colleagues fully occupied, but sound administrative reasons also existed. GOALS OF THE WAR CABINET The Cabinet is set to begin in the summer of 1940, prior to the entrance of the Soviets into the war in cooperation with the Great Britain and the entrance of the United States. One of the goals of the delegates, therefore, will be to discern ways of getting these nations as well as others into the war. The students should be well versed in the chronology and events of World War II up to the start date of the Cabinet. After that, the students should remember that events may not follow the exact chronology of the war as we know. This is a chance to change history. British War Cabinet 5 MEMBERS OF THE WAR CABINET Winston Churchill Winston Churchill was born to Lord Randolph and Jennie Churchill in 1974. He served in the British army in India in the 1890s. In 1899, while he was working as a war correspondent for the London Morning Post in South Africa, he was captured and placed in a prison camp; his escape from this camp made him famous. Churchill became a Conservative member of Parliament in 1901 and held various government offices over the next 30 years. From 1929 to 1939, Churchill was not active in the government, but remained in the public eye. When World War II began, he was appointed First Lord of the Admirality. He gained the post of Prime Minister in 1940. His powerful speeches demonstrated his determination not to settle for an imperfect peace with Hitler. Ernest Bevin Ernest Bevin was born in Somerset in 1881 and was orphaned at an early age. He quit school to work as a farm laborer until he moved to Bristol to take a job as a van driver at age 18. He was a religious nonconformist and spent a short time as a Baptist lay preacher. He joined the Dockers’ Union and the Labor Party. In 1921, he became General Secretary of the newly-formed Transport and General Workers’ Union, and remained in that position until 1940. Bevin was seen by his colleagues as a “moderate trade unionist.” In 1936, he supported the Popular Front government in Spain and the “heroic struggle carried on by the workers of Spain to save their democratic regime.” In May 1940, Churchill appointed him Minister of Labor, and in June he joined the House of Commons. British War Cabinet 6 Sir Kingsley Wood Sir Kingsley Wood was born to a clergyman in Hull in 1891. He was a solicitor in London until beginning his political career at the London City Council in 1911 as a member of the Conservative party. Wood joined the House of Commons in 1919. He was appointed Postmaster General in 1931 and worked to modernize the Post Office. From 1935 until 1938, he was Minister of Health. In 1938, Wood was appointed Secretary of State for Air by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. In that position, he established the Empire Air Training Plan and doubled the strength of the Royal Air Force. In May 1940, Churchill appointed Wood Chancellor of the Exchequer. Wood did not have as much power in that position as he would have had in peacetime because it is difficult to control public spending during wartime. Clement Attlee Clement Attlee was born in Putney in 1883. He became a lawyer in 1906 when he earned a degree from University College-Oxford. His volunteer work with a boys club sparked his interest in social problems, and he became a member of the Socialist party. In 1913, Attlee became a tutor at the London School of Economics. He left London to serve in the British Army in 1914. After being badly wounded in Mesopotamia, he returned to England to recover until he went to work for the army again in France in 1918. By the end of World War I, Attlee had ascended to the rank of Major. After the war, he returned to teaching. In 1919, Attlee entered politics as a member of the Labor Party as a mayor of Stepney. He held various positions in politics and became deputy leader of the Labor Party in 1931, then head of the British War Cabinet 7 Labor Party in 1935. In May 1940, Attlee joined Churchill’s government as the official Lord Privy Seal and the unofficial deputy Prime Minister. In that position he toned down some of Churchill’s more radical plans and paid attention to the interests of the working class. Arthur Greenwood Arthur Greenwood was born in Leeds in 1880. He worked as a lecturer in economics at Leeds University. From 1920-1922, he was Secretary of the Research and Information Department of the Labor Party. In 1922, he was elected to the House of Commons, and in 1929, he was appointed Minister of Health. Beginning in 1935, Greenwood worked as deputy leader of the Labor Party under Attlee. In the late 1930’s, Greenwood was a vocal critic of Neville Chamberlain and his foreign policy of appeasement. In May 1940, he joined the War Cabinet as Minister without Portfolio, meaning he did not have any defined duties. Greenwood was Churchill’s biggest supporter in the 1940 Cabinet debates over whether to accept a peace offer from Germany.
Recommended publications
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin
    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • (C) Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/23/83 Image
    (c) crown copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/23/83 Image Reference:0029 (THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT). SECRET. COPY NO. CABINET 29 (36). Meeting of the Cabinet to be held in the Prime Minister's Room, House of Commons, on THURSDAY, 9th APRIL, 1936, at 12 Noon. AGENDUM. PROGRAMME OF NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR 1936. ' (Reference Cabinet 10 (56) (b) to (e)). Memorandum by the First Lord of the Admiralty CP. 105 (56) - circulated herewith. (Signed) M.P.A. HANKEY, Secretary to the Cabinet. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1. 8th April, 1956. '(THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT) SECRET. COPY NO. CABINET 29 (36). CONCLUSIONS of a Meeting of the Cahinet held in the prime Minister's room, House of Commons, on THURSDAY, 9th APRIL, 1936, at 12 noon. PRESENT: The Right Hon. Stanley Baldwin,- M.P. , Prime Minister. (in the Chair). The Right.. Hon. The Right Hon. J. Ramsay MacDonald, M. P. , Neville Chamberlain, M.P. , Lord president of the Council, Chancellor of the Exchequer. Tie Right Hon. The Right Hon. '. The Viscount Hailsham, Sir John Simon, G.C.S.I., Lord Chancellor. K.C.V.O., O.B.E., K.C., M.P., Secretary of State for Home Affairs. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. A. Duff Cooper, D.S.O., M.P., Malcolm MacDonald, M.P., Secretary of State for War, Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs. The Right Hen, The Most Hon. The Viscount Swinton, G.B.E., The Marquess of Zetland, M.C., Secretary of State for G.CS.I., G.CI.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Publishing Government Legal Advice Table of Contents 1
    Library Briefing Publishing Government Legal Advice Table of Contents 1. Law Officers’ Legal Summary Advice to the Government In the UK, law officers of the crown are responsible for providing legal advice 2. Iraq War and the to the government. Successive governments have observed a long-standing Publication of Legal convention that the advice they receive from law officers is not disclosed Advice outside government. This House of Lords Library Briefing provides a brief 3. Legal Advice on overview of the role of the law officers and the convention on the publication Military Action Post-Iraq of their advice. It also gives examples of how the Government has referred to Conflict the convention in response to calls for it to make public the full advice that it 4. Brexit had received from law officers. The final section discusses demands for the Government to publish the legal advice that it has been given regarding Brexit. Over recent weeks, there have been repeated calls—including from Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and a former Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union—for the Government to publish in full the legal advice it has received about its proposed Brexit deal. On 13 November 2018, a binding motion for a return was agreed without division in the House of Commons, calling for “any legal advice in full, including that provided by the Attorney General, on the proposed withdrawal agreement on the terms of the UK’s departure from the European Union including the Northern Ireland backstop and framework for a future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union” to be laid before Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with Specific Reference to the Activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts
    Mother Russia and the Socialist Fatherland: Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with specific reference to the activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts by Nancy Butler A thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada November 2010 Copyright © Nancy Butler, 2010 ii Abstract This dissertation traces a shift in the Communist Party of Canada, from the 1929 to 1935 period of militant class struggle (generally known as the ‘Third Period’) to the 1935-1939 Popular Front Against Fascism, a period in which Communists argued for unity and cooperation with social democrats. The CPC’s appropriation and redeployment of bourgeois gender norms facilitated this shift by bolstering the CPC’s claims to political authority and legitimacy. ‘Woman’ and the gendered interests associated with women—such as peace and prices—became important in the CPC’s war against capitalism. What women represented symbolically, more than who and what women were themselves, became a key element of CPC politics in the Depression decade. Through a close examination of the cultural work of two prominent middle-class female members, Dorothy Livesay, poet, journalist and sometime organizer, and Eugenia (‘Jean’ or ‘Jim’) Watts, reporter, founder of the Theatre of Action, and patron of the Popular Front magazine New Frontier, this thesis utilizes the insights of queer theory, notably those of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler, not only to reconstruct both the background and consequences of the CPC’s construction of ‘woman’ in the 1930s, but also to explore the significance of the CPC’s strategic deployment of heteronormative ideas and ideals for these two prominent members of the Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Churchmen and the Twenty Years' Crisis
    Free Churchmen and the Twenty Years' Crisis T was E. H. Carr who coined the term "Twenty Years' Crisis" to I describe the period between 1919 and 1939. The optimism of the "war to end war" soon faded as Europe was wracked by new tensions and conflicts. If the Great War had witnessed the defeat of the German bid for Europeari hegemony, it had left fresh problems in its wake. The new states of Europe wrestled with the problems of nation­ building. Mter their success in the civil war, the Bolsheviks consoli­ dated their position in the Soviet Union. In Italy, Mussolini came to power and a new ideology "Fascism" had appeared. Despite the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles, German aspirations remained uncertain. Britain and France were frequently at loggerheads on the question of reparations from Germany. The United States played little part in European afiairs. British governments and people had to recognize that the absence of war did not mean tranquillity. The Irish Free State was established after a bitter struggle. The 1926 Imperial Conference recognized equality of status between Britain and the Dominions. Political activity in India began to gather pace. Japanese power in East Asia became steadily more apparent. Writing in 1918, J. H. Shakespeare dreaded lest "the Free Churches should maintain automatic movements and cries while with brain and heart, and even conscience, asleep, they march on through the wonderful new world, missing its golden harvests and deaf to .its significant calls". 1 The golden harvests proved elusive, and Free Churchmen did not find the "wond.erful new world" greatly to their taste.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of
    THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HOME OFFICE AND THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR WITH THE TREASURY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 1919-1946 AN EVALUATION OF CONTRASTING NEEDS NORMAN GEORGE PRICE Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD London School of Economics (University of London) 1 UMI Number: U042642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U042642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 t h e s e s F 68 nu-oaaiS ABSTRACT The thesis examines three Departments of the British Home Civil Service from 1919 to 1946: the Home Office, the Ministry of Labour and the Treasury Establishment Division. The study investigates the contrasting needs, in establishment terms, of an old "Secretary of State" department the Home Office, performing a largely regulatory role, with a new department the Ministry of Labour performing an administrative role, and the relationship of both over establishment matters with the Treasury. The study assesses the roles of individual Administrative Class civil servants in the three departments from the rank of Principal to Permanent Secretary: with particular reference to the relationships existing between the Permanent Secretaries of the two departments and the Permanent Secretaries of the Treasury and their Controllers of Establishments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Telegram Was Sent Today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister
    . No. 1. MR. ARTHUR GREENWOOD'S MESSAGE TO SEAMEN'S UNION. The following telegram was sent today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister Without Portfolio, to a meeting of the National Union of Seamen at Brighton!- Deeply regret unable to be with you today. I pay my tribute to the magnificent courage and fortitude of the Mercantile Marine. I feel confident that it will continue to play its full part in the grim struggle on which we are engaged. There is a grave call to-day to all our people to gird themselves for a mighty effort in order that victory shall be swift and sure,. 1REASURY.. 1 1 J'·l O J'\ !- • nu1lJ _ .r I..J E: -''J. ]·~ l'··T l J\j·- -o • 726 ,, _._ ___ ..._ ~-- - ------- The Air Ministry regrets to ~nnounce the following cauuulties on vari ous aates:- KILLED_J_~ACTION. ADAMS 27100 Flying Officer w.s.c. BEAUMONT 5521J,.L~3 Aircraf tmo.n 2nd Class O.Ro CI-IARL E '110 N 628854 Aircrnftman 1st Class R .. ECHLIN 77117 Pilot Officer R.W.H. JOHNSON 39533 Flying Officer N. PICKARD 539009 Aircro.ftman 1st Class J.G. ROONEY 541-i-996 Loading Aircraftman J. SKELTON 29147 Fli ght Lieutenant G.F.A. VAGG 70825 Pilot Officer E.A. WEBB 4315Ll, Pilot Officer H.G. WOLSTENHO LME 5801-i-46 Sergeant D. HAITHWAITE 524167 Sergeant N. HAYES 580893 Sergeant J.F. HORRIGAN 39525 Flying Officer OoGo WHITLEY 632190 Aircraftrnnn 2nd Class C.C. 1!1/0UNDED OR INJURED IN ACTION. BARRON 580276 Sergeant H.. J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution
    Internationalist Group League for th,e Fourth International The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution Volunteers from the anarcho-syndicalist CNT and POUM militias head to the front against Franco's forces in Spanish Civil War, Barcelona, September 1936. The bourgeois Popular Front government defended capitalist property, dissolved workers' militias and blocked the road to revolution. Internationalist Group Class Readings May 2007 $2 ® <f$l~ 1162-M Introduction The question of the popular front is one of the defining issues in our epoch that sharply counterpose the revolution­ ary Marxism of Leon Trotsky to the opportunist maneuverings of the Stalinists and social democrats. Consequently, study of the popular front is indispensable for all those who seek to play a role in sweeping away capitalism - a system that has brought with it untold poverty, racial, ethnic, national and sexual oppression and endless war - and opening the road to a socialist future. "In sum, the People's Front is a bloc of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat," Trotsky wrote in December 1937 in re­ sponse to questions from the French magazine Marianne. Trotsky noted: "When two forces tend in opposite directions, the diagonal of the parallelogram approaches zero. This is exactly the graphic formula of a People's Front govern­ ment." As a bloc, a political coalition, the popular (or people's) front is not merely a matter of policy, but of organization. Opportunists regularly pursue class-collaborationist policies, tailing after one or another bourgeois or petty-bourgeois force. But it is in moments of crisis or acute struggle that they find it necessary to organizationally chain the working class and other oppressed groups to the class enemy (or a sector of it).
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Cabinet Government? Coalition Politics and the Exercise of Political Power Emma Bell
    The Return of Cabinet Government? Coalition Politics and the Exercise of Political Power Emma Bell To cite this version: Emma Bell. The Return of Cabinet Government? Coalition Politics and the Exercise of Political Power. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2017. hal-01662078 HAL Id: hal-01662078 http://hal.univ-smb.fr/hal-01662078 Submitted on 12 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Return of Cabinet Government? Coalition Politics and the Exercise of Political Power Emma BELL Université de Savoie « The Return of Cabinet Government ? Coalition Politics and the Exercise of Political Power », in Leydier, Gilles (éd.) Revue française de la civilisation britannique, vol. 17, n°1, 2012. Abstract It is often said that political power in the UK is increasingly concentrated in the hands of the Prime Minister and a cadre of unelected advisers, prompting many commentators to announce the demise of Cabinet government. This paper will seek to determine whether or not the advent of coalition government is likely to prompt a return to collective decision-making processes. It will examine the peculiarities of coalition politics, continuities and ruptures with previous government practice and, finally, ask whether or not the return of Cabinet government is realistic or even desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manches
    Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 David W. Mottram School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of contents Abstract p.4 Declaration p.5 Copyright statement p.5 Acknowledgements p.6 Introduction p.7 Terminology, sources and methods p.10 Structure of the thesis p.14 Chapter One The Lost War p.16 1.1 The place of ‘Spain’ in British politics p.17 1.2 Viewing ‘Spain’ through external perspectives p.21 1.3 The dispersal, 1939 p.26 Conclusion p.31 Chapter Two Adjustments to the Lost War p.33 2.1 The Communist Party and the International Brigaders: debt of honour p.34 2.2 Labour’s response: ‘The Spanish agitation had become history’ p.43 2.3 Decline in public and political discourse p.48 2.4 The political parties: three Spanish threads p.53 2.5 The personal price of the lost war p.59 Conclusion p.67 2 Chapter Three The lessons of ‘Spain’: Tom Wintringham, guerrilla fighting, and the British war effort p.69 3.1 Wintringham’s opportunity, 1937-1940 p.71 3.2 ‘The British Left’s best-known military expert’ p.75 3.3 Platform for influence p.79 3.4 Defending Britain, 1940-41 p.82 3.5 India, 1942 p.94 3.6 European liberation, 1941-1944 p.98 Conclusion p.104 Chapter Four The political and humanitarian response of Clement Attlee p.105 4.1 Attlee and policy on Spain p.107 4.2 Attlee and the Spanish Republican diaspora p.113 4.3 The signal was Greece p.119 Conclusion p.125 Conclusion p.127 Bibliography p.133 49,910 words 3 Abstract Complexities and divisions over British left-wing responses to the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939 have been well-documented and much studied.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Cabinet Reshuffle
    2014 Cabinet Reshuffle Overview A War Cabinet? Speculation and rumours have been rife over Liberal Democrat frontbench team at the the previous few months with talk that the present time. The question remains if the Prime Minister may undertake a wide scale Prime Minister wishes to use his new look Conservative reshuffle in the lead up to the Cabinet to promote the Government’s record General Election. Today that speculation was in this past Parliament and use the new talent confirmed. as frontline campaigners in the next few months. Surprisingly this reshuffle was far more extensive than many would have guessed with "This is very much a reshuffle based on the Michael Gove MP becoming Chief Whip and upcoming election. Out with the old, in William Hague MP standing down as Foreign with the new; an attempt to emphasise Secretary to become Leader of the House of diversity and put a few more Eurosceptic Commons. Women have also been promoted faces to the fore.” to the new Cameron Cabinet, although not to the extent that the media suggested. Liz Truss Dr Matthew Ashton, politics lecturer- MP and Nicky Morgan MP have both been Nottingham Trent University promoted to Secretary of State for Environment and Education respectively, whilst Esther McVey MP will now attend Europe Cabinet in her current role as Minister for Employment. Many other women have been Surprisingly Lord Hill, Leader for the promoted to junior ministry roles including Conservatives in the House of Lords, has been Priti Patel MP to the Treasury, Amber Rudd chosen as the Prime Minister’s nomination for MP to DECC and Claire Perry MP to European Commissioner in the new Junker led Transport, amongst others.
    [Show full text]