DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 16576 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *. establishment of definite American bonded wineries within the proposed Par. 2. Section 18.0 is revised to read viticultural areas. The regulations also area, and approximately 2,000 acres are as follows: allow the name of an approved planted to wine grapes. The petitioner viticultural area to be used as an notes ``the area's great history and § 18.0 Effective date of temporary appellation of origin in the labeling and heritage of wine growing and regulations under the Subchapter S advertising of wine. winemaking is truly more impressive Revision Act of 1982. On October 2, 1979, ATF published than the number of acres currently The temporary regulations provided Treasury Decision ATF±60 (44 FR farmed.'' under §§ 18.1361±1, 18.1377±1, 56692) which added a new part 9 to 27 The petition was also signed by Philo 18.1379±1, and 18.1379±2 are effective CFR, providing for the listing of Biane of Rancho de Philo Winery, Rene with respect to taxable years beginning approved American viticultural areas. Biane of Guasti Plaza, Don Galleano of after 1982, and the temporary Section 4.25a(e)(1), Title 27, CFR, Galleano Winery, Paul Hofer III of Hofer regulations provided under § 18.1378±1 defines an American viticultural area as Ranch, LeAnn Smothers of the City of are effective with respect to elections a delimited grape-growing region Rancho Cucamonga, and Jeff Wilson, of made after October 19, 1982. distinguishable by geographical Inland Empire West Resource Cynthia E. Grigsby, features, the boundaries of which have Conservation District. been delineated in subpart C of part 9. Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Counsel (Corporate). Section 4.25a(e)(2) outlines the [FR Doc. 95±7970 Filed 3±30±95; 8:45 am] procedure for proposing an American In response to Mr. Filippi's petition, BILLING CODE 4830±01±P viticultural area. Any interested person ATF published a notice of proposed may petition ATF to establish a grape- rulemaking, Notice No. 802, in the growing region as a viticultural area. Federal Register on December 2, 1994 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and The petition should include: (59 FR 61853), proposing the Firearms (a) Evidence that the name of the establishment of the Cucamonga Valley proposed viticultural area is locally viticultural area. The notice requested 27 CFR Part 9 and/or nationally known as referring to comments from all interested persons by [TD ATF±362; Re: Notice No. 802] the area specified in the petition; January 31, 1995. (b) Historical or current evidence that RIN 1512±AA07 the boundaries of the viticultural area Comments on Notice of Proposed are as specified in the petition; Rulemaking Cucamonga Valley Viticultural Area (c) Evidence relating to the ATF received 15 letters of comment (94F±011P) geographical features (climate, soil, and copies of several newspaper articles AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco elevation, physical features, etc.) which and a newspaper editorial concerning and Firearms (ATF), Department of the distinguish the viticultural features of the proposal to establish the Cucamonga Treasury. the proposed area from surrounding Valley viticultural area. All commenters areas; expressed their support for establishing ACTION: Final rule, Treasury decision. (d) A description of the specific the Cucamonga Valley viticultural area SUMMARY: This final rule establishes a boundaries of the viticultural area, as proposed in Notice No. 802. viticultural area in San Bernardino and based on features which can be found Commenters included growers and Riverside Counties, California, to be on United States Geological Survey other local business owners, consumers, known as ``Cucamonga Valley.'' The (U.S.G.S.) maps of the largest applicable and government officials. petition was filed by Gino L. Filippi of scale; and The Honorable James L. Brulte, State J. Filippi Vintage Co. on behalf of (e) A copy of the appropriate U.S.G.S. Assembly Republican Leader, wrote to himself and other growers and wineries map(s) with the boundaries prominently support recognition of Cucamonga in the area. marked. Valley as a viticultural area. The ATF believes that the establishment of Petition Honorable Fred Aguiar, State viticultural areas and the subsequent Assemblyman for the Sixty-first ATF received a petition from Gino L. use of viticultural area names as assembly district, endorsed the Filippi of J. Filippi Vintage Co. appellations of origin in wine labeling establishment of Cucamonga Valley proposing to establish a viticultural area and advertising allows wineries to viticultural area and wrote further: in San Bernardino and Riverside designate the specific areas where the Counties, California, to be known as Our region has a long and distinguished grapes used to make the wine were ``Cucamonga Valley.'' The viticultural history in the winegrowing industry and it is grown and enables consumers to better highly appropriate that this area be area is located in southern California, identify the wines they purchase. recognized for such a distinction. about 45 miles east of the city of Los EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 1995. Angeles. It contains approximately The San Bernardino County Board of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 109,400 acres. The petitioner states that Supervisors adopted a resolution which Marjorie D. Ruhf, Wine, Beer and Spirits wine grapes, probably the mission read, in part, as follows: Regulations Branch, Bureau of Alcohol, variety, were first planted in the ** * RESOLVED that the Board of Tobacco and Firearms, 650 Cucamonga Valley in 1839 or 1840, Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, Massachusetts Avenue, NW., ``undoubtedly one of the first large State of California, hereby recognizes the Washington, DC 20226 (202±927±8230). plantings of grapes in California.'' efforts of the local wineries and supports the designation of ``CUCAMONGA VALLEY'' in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: According to the petitioner the wine industry in the Cucamonga Valley grew advertising and on the labels of wines produced in this vicinity. Background during the late nineteenth and early On August 23, 1978, ATF published twentieth centuries, reaching ``its peak The Honorable William J. Alexander, Treasury Decision ATF±53 (43 FR in the 1940's and 1950's with over 60 Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga, wrote: 37672, 54624) revising regulations in 27 wineries producing from approximately I would like to express our support in CFR part 4. These regulations allow the 35,000 acres.'' Today, there are five establishing the Cucamonga Valley as a Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 16577 viticulture area. The City of Rancho Historical Commission discussed The viticultural area includes the area Cucamonga takes great pride in the fact that designation of the Galleano Winery as a described above and the valley drained the grape vineyards and the wineries of our landmark. The letter makes several by the Cucamonga Creek to the south of area contributed so much to the early history references to the Cucamonga Valley, this alluvial fan. These areas share of the region. For this reason, a grape cluster characteristics of topography, soil has a prominent focus in both the City's seal mentioning locations within the and logo. proposed area such as Rancho composition and climate which Cucamonga, Fontana, Ontario and Mira distinguish the viticultural area from the Allyn B. Scheu of Scheu Loma. surrounding areas. The petitioner Manufacturing Company wrote that the provided the following evidence of the designation ``will help consumers to Evidence of Boundaries area's distinctiveness: identify the origins of the wines they As evidence that the boundaries for Topography buy and will recognize the Cucamonga the area are as specified in the petition, area's rich heritage of wine production.'' the previously cited excerpt from The The U.S.G.S. topographic maps Charles L. Keagle, a restauranteur, also Wines of America, by Leon D. Adams, submitted by the petitioner show the supported the designation and wrote states that the vineyard area of the viticultural area slopes gradually from that ``the history of the area, America's Cucamonga Valley ``extends from 2,000 feet at the northern boundary to first, goes back over 100 years.'' Ontario east to Fontana and from the 560 feet at the southern boundary. The Columnist Garry Greenberg of the base of the San Gabriel Mountains petitioner describes the San Gabriel Victorville, California Daily Press, sent southward to the Jurupa Hills in mountains to the north of the proposed in a copy of his September 15, 1994 Riverside County.'' The San Gabriel area as ``a great wall, from 8,000 to column which reported on the filing of Mountains form the northern boundary 10,000 feet high.'' The Jurupa the petition, and described the of the proposed area, and the Jurupa Mountains to the southeast of the area Cucamonga Valley area as ``the home of Hills form the eastern part of the offer another contrast as they rise the largest winemaking industry in the southern boundary. The towns of steeply from the valley floor to form part world a century ago.'' Mr. Greenberg Fontana and Ontario are both within the of the southern boundary. The balance also sent in the text of a column which area. of the southern boundary, the 560 foot he planned to publish in January 1995, ′ contour line, was chosen because the encouraging readers to write in support The petitioner used the 560 elevation area at lower elevations was poorly of the proposed area. line as the western portion of the drained and was traditionally used for The petitioner mailed in a clipping of southern boundary. He states the area dairy farming; furthermore, the nearby an editorial from the Inland Valley Daily south of that elevation has poor Prado Dam is scheduled to be raised, so Bulletin of December 30, 1994, which drainage and is mainly used for dairy the area to the south of the 560 foot concluded: farming.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chino Basin Water Bank Strategic Plan
    attExperience statements for each of the ARCADIS team members can be found in the ARCADIS Chinoproposal (AttachmentBasin C). Water Bank Strategic Plan WaterSMART Grants: Water Marketing Strategy Grants Funding Opportunity BOR-DO-1ϴ-F01Ϭ Inland Empire Utilities AgencyAgency JasonJason Gu, Grants OfficerOfficer 66075075 Kimball Avenue |Chino|Chino |CA|CA 91708 [email protected]@ieua.org Table of Contents Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria .................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background Data ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Project Description.................................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion A – Water Marketing Benefits ........................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion B – Level of Stakeholder Support and Involvement ..........................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Years 2021 & 2022 Cucamonga Valley Water
    CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUDGET FISCAL YEARS 2021 & 2022 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS BUDGET MESSAGE ....................................... 3 Debt .............................................................................................99 District-Wide Goals and Strategies ........................................ 4 DEPARTMENT INFORMATION .................. 102 Notable accomplishments ......................................................... 5 Position Summary Schedule ..................................................103 Short-Term Factors Influencing the Budget .......................... 5 Departmental Descriptions ..................................................105 Significant Budgetary Items ...................................................... 6 Executive Division .................................... 106 Budget Overview ........................................................................ 8 Board of Directors .................................................................107 Resolution NO. 2020-6-1 ........................................................10 Office of the General Manager ............................................109 Goals & Objectives ...................................................................11 Administrative Services Division ............. 111 Budget Guide .............................................................................14 Office of the Assistant General Manager ...........................112 History & Profile .......................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support
    March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support Services AVDC, Inc. 300 Phillipi Road Columbus, Ohio 43228 RE: Archaeological and Paleontologic Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road Apple Valley, San Bernardino, California Project # 2070.01 Dear Mr. Noethen: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. (Northgate) is submitting the attached Final Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, for the Jupiter Project property located on Navajo Road in the City of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call at (949) 716-0050 ext. 101. Sincerely, Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. Derrick Willis Principal Attachment: Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, cc: Roland M. Longo, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA Michael H. Wheeler, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA 428 13th Street, 4th Floor 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 20251 Century Boulevard, Suite 315 Oakland, California 94612 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Germantown, Maryland 20874 tel 510.839.0688 tel 949.716.0050 tel 301.528.1500 www.ngem.com ATTACHMENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES PHASE I ASSESSMENT Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road, Town of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Prepared by: Denise Ruzicka, M.A., M.S., RPA Edited by: Robin Turner, M.A. Michael X. Kirby, Ph.D. ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management Inc. 1531 Pontius Ave, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90025 424.248.3316 USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle: Apple Valley North (1970 revised 1993) Area: 106.4 acres March 2016 This document contains sensitive information regarding the location of archaeological sites which should not be disclosed to the general public or other unauthorized persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Writes Spring 2011 Newsletter
    CALIFORNIA water writes Esri • Spring 2011 GIS for Water/Wastewater In This Issue Fine Wine to Enterprise GIS Esri on the Road p2 Cucamonga Valley Water District Esri Online p2 Esri News p2 The Cucamonga Valley is an area that lies Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) GIS Puts Culver City Sewer Maps in p6 Their Place between the cities of Los Angeles and San was formed in 1955 as a special district under Bernardino in San Bernardino County, the provisions of Division 12 of the California Subsurface Utilities Mapping Program p8 Decreases Cost and Reduces Risk California. Originally known for its vast State Water Code and is an independent unit of vineyards and wineries, the valley hosted local government. It was formed from 23 small iWater—Take Your GIS to the Next Level p11 60 wineries and over 35,000 acres of vine from agricultural water systems and pipelines and the mid-1800s to the 1940s. In recent years, serves the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sewer connections and an average daily de- most of the vineyards have given way to unprec- portions of the cities of Fontana, Ontario, and mand of approximately 50 million gallons. edented growth in residential, commercial, and Upland. CVWD serves over 180,000 custom- Its water source is from purchased water industrial development, with two wineries and ers within a 47-square-mile service area that (Metropolitan Water District), ground water under 1,000 acres of vineyard remaining. includes 50,000 water connections and 35,000 wells, and surface runoff from the local foot- hill canyons.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County
    Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County Presented courtesy of the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County 215 North D Street, Suite 204 San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 383-9900; FAX (909) 383-9901 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.sbclafco.org Updated July 2013 LISTING OF SELF-GOVERNED SPECIAL DISTRICTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page AIRPORT DISTRICTS 2 CEMETERY DISTRICTS 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS 4 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS 10 HEALTHCARE DISTRICTS 14 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICTS 16 RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICTS 17 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 18 SANITATION DISTRICT 19 WATER DISTRICTS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS 20 WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 22 WATER DISTRICTS 23 SPECIAL ACT WATER AGENCIES 32 ASSOCIATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICTS 34 1 Local Agency Formation Commission, County of San Bernardino 215 North D Street, Suite 204, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 AIRPORT DISTRICTS BIG BEAR AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: James “Pete” Gwaltney, Manager 3rd District Formed: 12/17/79 PHONE: (909) 585-3219 Powers: Airport FAX: (909) 585-2900 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.bigbearcityairport.com M – F 7:00 am – 6:00 pm Sat & Sun 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O. Box 755 Big Bear City, CA 92314 OFFICE: 501 Valley Boulevard Big Bear City, CA 92314 Board of Directors Title Name Term End Date President Julie Smith 2016 Vice President Gary Stube 2014 Director Steve Castillo 2016 Director Steve Baker 2014 Director Chuck Knight 2016 YUCCA VALLEY AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: Chris Hutchins, Board President 3rd District Robert “Bob” Dunn, Vice President/Manager Formed: 6/7/82 Powers: Airport PHONE: (760) 401-0816 FAX: (760) 228-3152 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.yuccavalleyairport.com M – F 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
    ~ ~ Cucamonga Valley ® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA February 25, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room I 0440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. I. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda. 4. GENERAL MANAGER/CEO REPORTS John Bosler, General A) District Updates Manager/CEO B) IEUA Board Meeting Agenda 5. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Board request specific items be removed for separate action. A) Approve Minutes of the February I I, 2020 Regular Board Meeting. B) Approve Board Calendar of Events. C) Approve Cash & Investment Report for month ending December 31, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
    .! .! Cucamonga Valley® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA October 12, 2021 – 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room 10440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California As permitted under AB 361, in an effort to protect public health, prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus), and because state and/or local officials are recommending or imposing measures to promote social distancing, the public may participate in this Board meeting virtually. For those who wish to participate virtually, please use the following information: (877) 568-4106, Access Code: 955- 106-309 https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/955106309. Please be advised that members of the public are permitted to attend this meeting in person at the location listed above. OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Round 3 Program/Project Concepts
    Round 3 Program/Project Concepts Color Name Agency Program/Project Email Glenn Cajar Chino CA Resident Garden Friendly landscapes [email protected] Nancy Horton City of Canyon Lake Friendly Landscaping [email protected] Linda Nixon City of Hemet Water Rate Structures - efficient Use [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Tiered Rates [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Fixed Network/Smart Meters [email protected] Nehal Thumar David Taussig & Associates Water Rate Structures with leak detection [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Landscape Guidance Manual [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Smart Controllers & Nozzles [email protected] Jesus Gastelum Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Task force to share & Evaluate demand Reduction/Efficiency [email protected] LeAnne Hamilton Inland Empire Utilities Agency Coordinated Rebate Program - Mult. Agencies [email protected] Jason Uhley Riverside County Flood Control and Water LID/StormWater/Use Efficiency/ Flow reduction [email protected] Demand Reduction Conservation District and Water Use Jolene Church Riverside Public Utility Smart Irrigation Controllers [email protected] Efficiency Mark Adelson RWQCB Santa Ana Region Community Based vegetable Gardening project/provide [email protected] community nutrition and produce water quality services Sarah Miggins Southern California Mountain Foundation Outreach [email protected] James
    [Show full text]
  • 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California
    :: OFFERING MEMORANDUM Capital Markets | Private Client Group :: INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California Capital Markets | Private Client Group Value Add Institutional Quality Industrial/Office Incubator Park Priced at 50% Below Replacement Cost. TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights 02 Property Location Aerial Photographs Local and Regional Maps 03 Property Description Property Description Site Plan 04 The Market City Overview County Overview Sale Comparables 05 Financials Executive Summary Financing Assumptions Cash Flor Projections Leveraged Summary In-Place NOI vs. Pro-Forma NOI IPRO Forma Income Existing vs. Market Comparison Vacant Space Assumptions Lease Expirations For more information on Foxborough Business Park, please visit our website at Rent Roll www.pcgnb.com/FoxboroughBP Replacement Cost 3 FOXBOROUGH BUSINESS PARK | Property Summary 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights PROPERTY SUMMARY Investment Summary Investment Highlights Foxborough Business Park “Value Add” Industrial/Office Park Opportunity Priced at $8,250,000 ($64 PSF) which is significantly below 12402 Industrial Boulevard x Rare opportunity to acquire a seven building business the estimated replacement cost of $16,095,765 ($126 PSF) Victorville, CA 92395 park that is divided into 35 units. x Low future risk once the project is leased, of major Ideal Victorville Business Park Location Purchase Price ....................................$8,250,000 vacancy due to 35
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report
    APPENDIX A Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT for the ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND CONSERVATION PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Sargent Town Planning 706 South Hill Street, 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 Contact: David Sargent Prepared by: Adriane Dorrler, BA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA, Kate Kaiser, MSHP, Linda Kry, BA, and Rachel Hoerman, PhD, RPA 38 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 JUNE 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE (NADB) INFORMATION Authors: Adriane Dorrler, BA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA, and Kate Kaiser, MSHP Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: Sargent Town Planning 706 South Hill Street, 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 Contact: David Sargent Report Date: June 2019 Report Title: Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California Type of Study: Cultural Resources Inventory and Significance Evaluation New Sites: Temporary Designations: 9020-AD-02, 9020-AV-01, 9020-BC-01, 9020- ISO-PH-01, 9020-ISO-AD-01, 9020-ISO-KS-01 Updated Sites: None USGS Quads: Rancho Cucamonga Peak, Mount Baldy, Devore, CA 1:24,000; T 1N / R 6W, 7W Acreage: Approximately 4,388 acres Keywords: survey, intensive, positive results, evaluation, historic refuse scatter, bedrock milling station, 4,388 acres, City of Rancho Cucamonga 9020 i January 2019 Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9020 ii January 2019 Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan Rancho Cucamonga, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucamonga Valley ® ~ Water District
    • • Cucamonga Valley ® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA September 24. 2019 - 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room I 0440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. I. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda. 4. GENERAL MANAGER/CEO REPORTS John Bosler, General A) District Updates Manager/CEO B) Miscellaneous Correspondence C) IEUA Board Meeting Agenda 5. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Board request specific items be removed for separate action. A) Approve Minutes of the September I 0, 2019 Regular Board Meeting. B) Approve Board Calendar of Events. C) Approve Cash and Investment Report for month ending August 31, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • LAFCO 3222 -- Sphere of Influence Establishment for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (San Bernardino County Portion)
    LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1170 West Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 388-0480 Fax (909) 388-0481 E-MAIL: [email protected] www.sbclafco.org DATE: JANUARY 10, 2018 FROM: KATHLEEN ROLLINGS-McDONALD, Executive Officer MICHAEL TUERPE, Project Manager TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: Agenda Item #8: LAFCO 3222 -- Sphere of Influence Establishment for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (San Bernardino County portion) INITIATED BY: Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission take the following actions related to the sphere of influence establishment for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: 1. For environmental review, certify that LAFCO 3222 is statutorily exempt from environmental review, and direct the Executive Officer to file a Notice of Exemption within five (5) days; 2. Approve the sphere of influence establishment for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California within San Bernardino County as coterminous with that of its member agency, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, excluding that area defined in this report as being proposed for reorganization between the Inland Empire Utilities Agency and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; and, 3. Establish the description of the functions and services of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (San Bernardino County portion) as FUNCTION: Water SERVICE: Those water services or powers identified in the Metropolitan Water District Act (Water Code Appendix Section 109-130 through 109-136) AGENDA ITEM #8- LAFCO 3222 January 10, 2018 to be identified in the LAFCO Policy and Procedure Manual, Section VI, Chapter 3: Listing of Special Districts within San Bernardino LAFCO Purview - Authorized Functions and Services.
    [Show full text]